1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the given content 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The binding of the Trump administration's tariff and tax - cut policies will become more obvious, and it is highly likely that the two policies will either pass or be rejected simultaneously [2][11] - The US employment market is operating stably. In May, employment signals were contradictory, but non - farm employment increased by 1.1% year - on - year, and the weekly wage index growth rate is close to the pre - pandemic level, which may not change the downward trend of core inflation [2][14] - The focus of monetary policy lies in the persistence of the impact of tariffs on inflation [2][14] 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 High - frequency Data Panoramic Scan - CBO estimates that the OBBBA may lead to a reduction of $3.7 trillion in federal fiscal revenue and $1.3 trillion in expenditure from 2025 - 2034, along with $55.1 billion in debt costs, resulting in an increase of about $3 trillion in government debt. However, tariffs may reduce the deficit by $2.8 trillion from 2025 - 2035, but will also cause negative economic impacts and inflation in the next two years [2][10] - The Trump administration's tariff policy faces legal challenges, and the OBBBA is still under discussion in the Senate. The binding of tariff and tax - cut policies will be stronger [2][11] - In May, the US employment market had contradictory signals. ADP employment increased slightly, while non - farm employment grew strongly. Non - farm employment increased by 1.1% year - on - year, and the non - farm hourly wage growth rate was stable [2][14] - From June 2 - 7, 2025, agricultural product prices mostly declined, and commodity prices showed mixed trends. For example, the average wholesale price of pork decreased by 0.55% week - on - week, and the price of Brent crude oil futures increased by 1.60% week - on - week [2] 3.2 High - frequency Data and Important Macroeconomic Indicators Trend Comparison - Multiple charts show the trend comparison between high - frequency data and important macro - indicators such as PPI, CPI, and export volume, but specific analysis is not provided in the text [22][28][29] 3.3 Important High - frequency Indicators in the US and Europe - Charts display the relationship between US weekly economic indicators and actual economic growth, initial jobless claims and unemployment rate, same - store sales growth and PCE year - on - year, etc., as well as the implied prospects of interest rate hikes or cuts by the Federal Reserve and the ECB, but specific analysis is not provided in the text [83][85][87] 3.4 Seasonal Trends of High - frequency Data - Multiple charts show the seasonal trends of high - frequency data such as 30 - city commercial housing transaction area, LME copper spot settlement price, and production material price index, but specific analysis is not provided in the text [94][96][100] 3.5 High - frequency Traffic Data in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen - Charts show the year - on - year changes in subway passenger volume in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen, but specific analysis is not provided in the text [147][151]

Group 1: Macro Economic Trends - In May, the implied probability of a U.S. recession dropped from 63% at the end of April to 29% by June 6, indicating improved market sentiment[1] - The Federal Reserve's implied rate cut expectations decreased from 4.1 times to 2.2 times, reflecting a more optimistic outlook[1] - U.S. Treasury yields rose significantly, with the 10-year yield increasing by 34 basis points to 4.51% due to concerns over fiscal sustainability and a rapid rise in Japanese bond yields[1][19] Group 2: Domestic Economic Developments - The domestic economy is transitioning from "old forces" to "new forces," with signs of slowing recovery in May, as retail sales growth fell to 5.1%[2][32] - The broad fiscal expenditure growth rate increased to 12.9% in April, providing strong support for the economy[2][46] - A series of financial policies were announced on May 7, including a surprise reserve requirement ratio cut, aimed at stabilizing market confidence[2][46] Group 3: Trade and Policy Uncertainties - The U.S. is facing uncertainties regarding tariff policies and tax reforms, with key decisions expected around mid-June[3] - The second round of U.S.-China trade negotiations is set to begin on June 9, focusing on tariff corridors and export mechanisms[4] - The potential adjustment of the fiscal budget by the National People's Congress in June is a critical area to watch for its impact on economic support[3]

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry or Company Involved - The discussion revolves around the "Beautiful Act" and its implications on the U.S. economy and fiscal policy. Core Insights and Arguments - The "Beautiful Act" is expected to significantly expand the U.S. fiscal deficit over the next decade, particularly between 2025 and 2028, with 2027 projected to be the peak year for deficit increase. Post-2028, the expansion rate is expected to slow down as spending cuts are implemented [1][5][9]. - Without considering tariff impacts, the U.S. deficit rate may remain above 6% for the next 30 years, potentially exceeding 10% by 2055 [1][5]. - Tax reduction policies have varying impacts across income groups, benefiting high-income individuals the most while low-income groups see minimal benefits. For the lowest 20% income bracket, the negative effects of tariffs may outweigh the positive effects of tax cuts, leading to an overall negative outcome [1][6]. - Historical data indicates that tax cuts typically boost the stock market and significantly enhance corporate profitability. For instance, after the tax cuts implemented in 2018, most sectors experienced positive profit growth, particularly in energy, finance, and industrial sectors [1][7]. - There are notable differences between the Senate and House versions of the "Beautiful Act." The Senate proposes a $5.8 trillion increase in the deficit budget, including $3.8 trillion for the extension of the TCJA, while the House version suggests a $2.8 trillion increase. The Senate's proposed spending cuts are significantly lower than those in the House version [1][8]. Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content - The timeline of the Trump fiscal plan shows an initial increase in deficit and spending during his term (2025-2028) to stimulate the economy, with a significant reduction in deficit expected after the 2029 transition to a new president [1][9]. - The U.S. fiscal expansion policy is influenced by various rules, such as the Paygo principle and the Byrd rule, which require new legislation not to increase the deficit over ten years. However, past presidents have often favored expanding fiscal spending to boost the economy, suggesting a continued trend of deficit increase in the future [1][10]. - Trump's tariff policy plays a crucial role in the advancement of the tax reduction plan. Tariff revenues are a significant supplement to U.S. fiscal income, and any inability to collect these tariffs could increase fiscal pressure. Despite challenges, Trump may still implement tariffs through other means, ensuring that the tax reduction plan's outcome remains largely unaffected [1][11]. - The likelihood of the tax reduction plan passing is bolstered by the reconciliation process, requiring only 51 Republican votes in the House for approval. Current dynamics suggest that as long as opposition votes are limited, the plan can proceed [1][12]. - Balancing future tax reductions with increased deficits will require navigating existing regulations while addressing practical operational needs. The trend indicates a continued push towards fiscal expansion, with potential adjustments in tariff policies to maintain economic stability [1][13].

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry or Company Involved - The discussion revolves around the "Beautiful Act" proposed by the Trump administration, which focuses on tax reforms and budget modifications in the United States. Core Points and Arguments - The "Beautiful Act" aims to extend and upgrade existing tax reduction policies, including personal income tax rate reductions, standard deduction settings, and estate tax exemptions, with an expected fiscal expansion of approximately $4 trillion for residents. However, the permanent nature of the personal income tax rate could lead to a cumulative deficit of about $10.2 trillion over the next decade [1][2][3]. - The corporate tax rate remains unchanged at 21%, with only minor adjustments in areas such as capital investment expensing, depreciation calculations, and profit shifting to avoid excessive fiscal pressure [1][2]. - To ensure government funding, the "Beautiful Act" requires an increase of approximately $4 trillion in the debt ceiling, alongside spending cuts in areas like Medicaid, Affordable Care Act subsidies, food stamps, and student loans [1][3]. - The Senate review process for the "Beautiful Act" may involve modifications, as the Senate can amend provisions that violate budget rules. The final version must be agreed upon by both the House and Senate and signed by the President to take effect [4]. Important but Possibly Overlooked Content - There are internal divisions within the Republican Party regarding the "Beautiful Act," with some senators opposing the scale of the debt ceiling increase or the adequacy of spending cuts. The critical deadlines include a hard constraint period from late July to early August, with September 30 being the final deadline for budget resolution [5][6]. - If the "Beautiful Act" fails to pass on time, it could lead to a sovereign debt default for the U.S. government, increasing fiscal policy uncertainty and negatively impacting the economy, including decreased consumer confidence and worsened corporate profit expectations [2][7]. - The act includes new tax benefits for residents, such as deductions for tip income and overtime pay, and the establishment of Magma accounts for U.S.-born children to support education, entrepreneurship, or home purchases [3].

Core Viewpoint - Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, argues that while the immediate risk of a U.S. debt crisis is low, the long-term risk is significantly high, warning that the U.S. government debt situation is approaching a "death spiral" that could threaten the stability of the global economy [1][2]. Group 1: Debt Situation - The U.S. government is on an unsustainable path regarding its debt, with the debt-to-GDP ratio projected to rise from 104% in 2017 to 123% by 2024 [4]. - Dalio emphasizes that higher deficits will necessitate the Treasury to issue more bonds, which could lead to a classic "debt death spiral" where rising interest rates worsen credit risk, reducing demand for debt and further increasing rates [2][4]. Group 2: Market Reactions - The bond market has become increasingly volatile, with the 30-year Treasury yield reaching its highest level in 2023, driven by investor concerns over rising risks associated with U.S. government loans [1][5]. - Barclays analysts note that long-term bond yields are nearing their highest levels since the 2008 financial crisis, indicating that the market is adjusting to the implications of new tax legislation and rising deficits [5]. Group 3: Political Landscape - Dalio criticizes both Democratic and Republican parties for their inability to cooperate on addressing the debt issue, likening the situation to a ship heading towards rocks without a consensus on how to change course [5].

Group 1: USD Outlook - The USD index has shown a downward trend since the beginning of the year, primarily influenced by tariff policies, with a peak at 109 in early 2025 and a drop below 100 in April[1][7]. - Short-term fluctuations in the USD index are expected, with limited downward space before potential Fed rate cuts, while medium to long-term pressures include ongoing US debt issues, recession risks, and de-dollarization narratives[1][7]. - Key factors suppressing the USD include the continuous evolution of US debt issues, recession risks compounded by high interest rates, and the narrative of de-dollarization[1][7]. Group 2: HK Stock Market Strategy - Following a joint statement from China and the US on May 12, the Hang Seng Index rose nearly 3%, but the upward trend did not sustain, leading to a "wait and see" market attitude[2][10]. - Southbound capital inflows continue but at a slower pace, with over HKD 16.5 billion net inflow into the banking sector, while the technology sector faced a net outflow exceeding HKD 20.5 billion[2][10]. - The current valuation of the Hang Seng Index is slightly below pre-tariff levels, indicating a gradual recovery in market sentiment[2][10]. Group 3: US Economic Outlook - The outlook for the US economy remains unclear due to fluctuating tariff policies and their impact on inflation, with a potential rise in overall inflation post-tariff implementation[3][14]. - The US federal budget deficit for the first half of 2025 has exceeded USD 1.3 trillion, marking the second-highest deficit for a half-year period in history[3][14]. - The combination of rising interest rates and upcoming debt ceiling negotiations presents significant challenges for US fiscal policy in the latter half of 2025[3][14]. Group 4: US Stock Market Outlook - Major US indices have recovered from significant declines, reflecting investor confidence in the US economic fundamentals and policy adjustments[4][17]. - The anticipated tax cuts from the "Beautiful America Act" are expected to create structural opportunities in the US stock market, particularly benefiting traditional energy and local automotive sectors[4][17]. - Despite the challenges posed by fluctuating tariff policies, the US stock market is projected to exhibit a volatile upward trend in the second half of 2025[4][17]. Group 5: US Treasury Yield Trends - US long-term treasury yields have risen above 5%, with the 20-year and 30-year yields maintaining levels above 5.0% since late May[5][21]. - The increase in yields is attributed to the downgrade of the US credit rating by Moody's and concerns over the debt ceiling, which may lead to increased treasury supply and liquidity withdrawal[5][21]. - The expectation of delayed Fed rate cuts due to inflation concerns is likely to keep treasury yields elevated for an extended period[5][21].

Group 1 - The Federal Reserve may consider interest rate cuts in the second half of 2025 if tariffs remain around 10% [1] - The ongoing trade tensions have created a dilemma for the Federal Reserve, balancing between persistent inflation data and market volatility caused by tariffs [3] - The U.S. market experienced a significant downturn on May 21, with a sharp rise in bond yields, a drop in stock prices, and the dollar index falling below 100 [4] Group 2 - The long-standing debt issues have been exacerbated by the trade tensions, leading to increased scrutiny on the Federal Reserve's role in stabilizing the market [5] - The weak auction of 20-year U.S. Treasury bonds on May 22 resulted in a "triple whammy" effect on stocks, bonds, and currencies, with the S&P 500 index dropping nearly 1.6% [7] - The auction's final yield of 5.047% marked a significant increase from previous rates, indicating a lack of demand and raising concerns about the U.S. fiscal situation [8] Group 3 - The recent surge in U.S. Treasury yields has raised fears among investors regarding the government's fiscal health and monetary policy [8] - The ongoing trade war has revealed underlying issues in the U.S. economy, with tariff revenues not keeping pace with rising national debt [9] - The proposed tax cuts are expected to further pressure the U.S. debt situation, with potential implications for the bond market [10] Group 4 - The anticipated tax legislation is projected to reduce household tax burdens significantly, which could impact the fiscal deficit and bond market reactions [11] - The recent rebound in U.S. stocks has raised questions about the sustainability of this rally amid ongoing geopolitical risks and rising federal spending [12] - Investors are advised to be cautious with dollar assets as the market navigates through the current volatility, with a potential shift towards safe-haven assets like gold and yen [13][14]

Group 1 - The report indicates that the U.S. stock market has shown resilience despite significant volatility since the beginning of 2025, with major indices recovering from earlier declines caused by tariff policies [5][6][7]. - The S&P 500, Dow Jones, and Nasdaq indices have largely regained their losses, reflecting investor confidence in the U.S. economic fundamentals and adaptability to policy adjustments [6][7]. - The report anticipates a volatile upward trend for the U.S. stock market in the second half of 2025, driven by economic fundamentals and policy benefits, particularly from the "Beautiful Bill" tax cuts [14][26]. Group 2 - The "Beautiful Bill" tax plan is expected to be a key driver for the U.S. stock market, with projected tax cuts amounting to $3.8 trillion over the next decade, while also increasing the fiscal deficit by approximately $2.5 trillion [17][18]. - The report highlights that the tax cuts will create structural opportunities in traditional energy, high-tax state consumption, and domestic automotive sectors, while clean energy and healthcare sectors may face challenges [26]. - The performance of various sectors has been uneven, with industrials, utilities, and consumer staples leading gains, while non-essential consumer goods and healthcare lagged due to trade uncertainties and high valuations [9][14]. Group 3 - The technology sector, particularly the Magnificent 7 (Mag 7), has shown signs of recovery, with a significant rebound in stock prices following earlier declines due to tariff policies [21][22]. - The report notes that the Mag 7 companies have demonstrated strong earnings growth, with a 28% year-over-year increase in Q1, surpassing the S&P 500's 9% growth [22]. - The tax plan's provision allowing full deduction of domestic R&D and experimental expenses is expected to benefit technology companies heavily reliant on research and development [22][26].

Group 1 - The core point of the news is the passage of Trump's comprehensive tax reduction bill, known as the "Beautiful Bill," by the U.S. House Budget Committee, marking a significant victory for Trump and House Speaker Johnson [1][3] - The bill aims to significantly reduce taxes, cut government spending, ease regulations, and increase border security funding, with a potential vote in the House expected soon [1][3] - The bill is positioned as a landmark legislative achievement for Trump's second term, with Johnson claiming it represents the largest spending cut in over thirty years [3] Group 2 - Trump's tax policies have historically stimulated the economy and employment, but there are concerns about long-term fiscal imbalance and increasing wealth disparity, leading to ongoing debates in both academic and political circles [5] - The bill proposes substantial cuts to the Medicaid program, which could result in over 10 million low-income Americans losing their health insurance coverage [3] - The Senate recently passed a separate bill aimed at eliminating federal taxes on tips for service industry workers, indicating bipartisan support for tax reduction measures [5][7]

Group 1 - The IMF calls for the U.S. to reduce its fiscal deficit in light of rising debt burdens, emphasizing that the current deficit is too large [1][2] - Moody's has downgraded the U.S. credit rating due to concerns over increasing debt, with projections indicating that the deficit-to-GDP ratio could rise from 6.4% last year to nearly 9% by 2035 if proposed tax cuts are implemented [1][2] - The U.S. Treasury Secretary attributes the downgrade to the previous administration's policies and expresses a commitment to reducing the deficit-to-GDP ratio to 3% before the end of the Trump administration [1][2] Group 2 - The U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to reach 98% in the fiscal year 2024, up from 73% a decade ago, indicating a continuous rise in debt levels [2] - Despite expectations of a decrease in the fiscal deficit due to rising tariff revenues, these forecasts do not account for the potential impacts of Trump's tax cut proposals currently under congressional review [2][4] - Concerns over the deficit and Moody's downgrade have led to a weakening of the dollar and a rise in U.S. Treasury yields, with the 10-year Treasury yield reaching 5.04%, the highest level in 2023 [3][4] Group 3 - The expansion of the deficit implies that the government will need to issue more bonds, raising questions about the stability of the U.S. market among domestic and international investors [4] - The IMF has revised down its economic growth forecast for the U.S. in 2025 to 1.8% and for global growth to 2.8%, factoring in the effects of Trump's tariffs [4] - Recent announcements of significant tariff reductions between the U.S. and China are seen as positive developments, although the actual tariff rates remain higher than last year, and uncertainties persist regarding the implementation of new tax rates [5]