这个周末，"娃哈哈宗馥莉被起诉"的消息刷屏了！到底怎么回事？ 7月13日，据环球时报等媒体报道， 娃哈哈董事长宗馥莉因资产纠纷在香港被起诉 ，三名原告 是宗继昌（Jacky Zong）、宗婕莉（Jessie Zong）和宗继盛（Jerry Zong）。原告律师称，这 三人是宗馥莉的 "同父异母弟妹" ，此前，宗馥莉一直被公众视为宗庆后（已故）的独生女。 原告律师称，三人同时在杭州法院提起诉讼，要求获得各价值 7亿美元（共21亿美元，约151 亿元人民币） 的信托基金权益。据称这些基金是其父生前承诺设立。 原告方声称，宗庆后曾指示下属通过香港汇丰银行设立信托，汇丰账户2024年初余额 约18亿 美元 ，文件显示，截至去年5月，已有110万美元被转出该账户。原告方要求冻结该汇丰账 户，宗馥莉执行父亲遗嘱， 支付数百万美元资产利息 ，并赔偿资金转移造成的损失。 1982年出生的宗馥莉，在早年留学归来后，并未直接进入集团核心管理层，而是先从市场部基 层做起，逐步熟悉饮料生产、供应链管理与渠道布局。她的商业能力，从一手打造的宏胜饮料 集团可见一斑：该企业从一条生产线起步，发展至拥有20个生产基地、40多家子公司及100 ...

行 业 及 产 业 海外消费服务 行 业 研 究 / 行 业 点 评 2025 年 07 月 11 日 港股医药中报前瞻—子行业分化明显，创新药 持续销售放量 看好 ——海外消费周报（20250704-20250710） 相关研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 证券分析师 黄哲 A0230513030001 huangzhe@swsresearch.com 周文远 A0230518110003 zhouwy@swsresearch.com 贾梦迪 A0230520010002 jiamd@swsresearch.com 胡梦婷 A0230524060004 humt@swsresearch.com 研究支持 胡梦婷 A0230524060004 humt@swsresearch.com 联系人 胡梦婷 (8621)23297818× humt@swsresearch.com 本研究报告仅通过邮件提供给 中庚基金 使用。1 本期投资提示： ⚫ 海外医药：港股医药中报前瞻—子行业分化明显，创新药持续销售放量 港股医药中报前瞻：创新药：商业化持续放量，部分公司有望迎来盈利拐点。创新药板块，我们预计 1H25 收入同比增速 ...

今日重点推荐 2025 年 07 月 10 日 债券基金的指数化投资浪潮：产品战略、管理人策略以及应用 场景分析——金融产品每周见 20250702 债券基金的指数化投资浪潮： 2018 年 4 月，自广发 1-3 年农发债指数基 金成功发行开始，债券指数基金进入常态化发展新篇。当前指数型债券基 金共 341 只、规模合计 1.42 万亿元，债券基金中指数产品规模占比达到 16%，其中场外债券指数基金、利率债指数基金仍占主导地位。 | 指数 | 收盘 | | 涨跌（％） | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 名称 | （点） | 1 日 | 5 日 | 1 月 | | 上证指数 | 3493 | -0.13 | 2.74 | 1.11 | | 深证综指 | 2102 | -0.04 | 3.72 | 1.77 | | 风格指数 | 昨日表现 | 1 个月表现 | 6 个月表现 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | （％） | （％） | （％） | | 大盘指数 | -0.18 | 2.63 | 5.49 | | 中盘指数 | -0.32 | 3 ...

上 市 公 司 公 司 研 究 / 公 司 深 度 茶饮 2025 年 07 月 09 日 霸王茶姬 (CHA) ——高端现制茶饮第一，打造全球化的现代东方茶品牌 报告原因：首次覆盖 买入（首次评级） | 市场数据： | 2025 年 7 月 8 日 | | --- | --- | | 收盘价（美元） | 28.01 | | 纳斯达克 100 指数 | 22702.25 | | 52 周最高/最低（港币） | 41.80/25.26 | | 美股市值（亿美元） | 53 | | 流通股数（百万股） | 118 | | 汇率（美元/人民币） | 7.17 | 一年内股价与基准指数对比走势： 资料来源：Bloomberg 相关研究 《蜜雪集团（02097）深度：现制茶饮第一， 平价锚定，供应链为基》 2025/05/07 《古茗（01364）深度：大众现制茶饮第一， 最大规模冷链赋能》 2025/04/09 证券分析师 贾梦迪 A0230520010002 jiamd@swsresearch.com 联系人 贾梦迪 (8621)23297818× jiamd@swsresearch.com 投资要点： 财务数据及 ...

寻找下一个明星——港股通 2025 年 9 月调整名单预测 20250708 摘要 港股市场整体呈现震荡但缓慢上升的格局，盈利预期稳定、无风险利率 下降及高股息板块投资者增加是主要驱动因素。当前市场隐含股权风险 溢价约为 5.4%，情绪指标略有上行空间。 港股通对港股市场影响显著，港股通投资者贡献的成交量已达总成交量 的 25%，未来需重视港股通纳入标的带来的投资机会。低成本资金通过 港股通抬高指数估值，压低隐含 ERP 波动区间。 无风险利率环境下降将推动港股市场，美联储降息预期最早可能在 2025 年 9 月或第四季度实现。HIBOR 波动主要受短期 IPO 活动和派息 影响，对主流投资者资金成本影响相对间接。 公司被剔除出港股通通常对其股价产生较大压力，而被纳入港股通的公 司，其股价平均涨幅通常为正。关注哪些公司可能入通或出通，对投资 具有重要指导意义。 周六福受益于金价上涨和滞后需求释放，黄金珠宝销售额在社零全品类 中排名靠前，并保持双位数增长。公司聚焦下沉市场，全国性布局完善， 产品矩阵丰富，线上收入占比高。 Q&A 申万宏源对 2025 年下半年港股市场的策略观点是什么？ 根据申万宏源的半年度策略 ...

Group 1 - Company Overview: Founded in 2010 by Wang Yunan in Zhejiang, Guming specializes in fruit tea, milk tea, and coffee, targeting the "small town youth" demographic with affordable pricing between 10-20 RMB [1][3] - Ownership Structure: Wang Yunan holds 43.21% of shares, making him the largest shareholder, while co-founders Qi Xia and Ruan Xiudi hold 19.78% and 13.74% respectively [1] - Funding History: Prior to its IPO, Guming secured two rounds of financing from notable investors including Sequoia China, Meituan, Tencent, and others [1] Group 2 - Revenue Growth: In 2024, Guming reported revenue of 8.79 billion RMB, reflecting a 14.5% year-on-year increase, but a significant decline from the previous year's 38.1% growth [4][6] - Profitability Concerns: The adjusted net profit grew only 5.7% to 1.54 billion RMB, indicating a decline in core business profitability despite a nominal increase in net profit [5][6] Group 3 - Market Saturation: The tea beverage market is experiencing high saturation, with over 410,000 milk tea shops nationwide and a closure rate of 60% in lower-tier cities, leading to reduced customer acquisition and retention for Guming [7][9] - Competitive Landscape: Guming faces intense competition from both high-end brands like Heytea and Nayuki, which have entered the lower price segments, and low-cost competitors like Mixue Ice City [9][12] Group 4 - Innovation Challenges: Guming launched 85 new products in 2024, but none became a hit, leading to a decline in customer loyalty and increased competition in a market characterized by product homogeneity [11][12] - Strategic Dilemmas: The company is caught in a strategic bind due to price wars and a lack of unique selling propositions, making it difficult to attract new customers and retain existing ones [12][13] Group 5 - Franchise Expansion Issues: Guming's franchise growth has slowed, with new store openings dropping from 2,597 in 2023 to 1,587 in 2024, while closures increased significantly [17][23] - Store Performance Metrics: Single-store GMV decreased from 2.47 million RMB in 2023 to 2.36 million RMB in 2024, reflecting a decline in sales efficiency [19][21] Group 6 - Shift to Coffee: Guming is pivoting towards the coffee market as a second growth curve, recognizing the trend of coffee becoming a mainstream beverage and leveraging its existing infrastructure [25][28] - Operational Strengths: The company has a robust supply chain and a high "second store rate" among franchisees, indicating confidence in the brand and providing a buffer for operational adjustments [24][29] Group 7 - Market Positioning: Guming aims to integrate coffee and tea offerings, creating a "tea-coffee integrated" experience to meet diverse consumer demands and enhance brand loyalty [34][35] - Future Growth Strategy: The company is focused on breaking category boundaries and embracing market trends to navigate the challenges of a saturated market and achieve sustainable growth [35]

Core Viewpoint - The article analyzes the competitive landscape of the tea beverage industry, focusing on four major players: Gu Ming, Cha Bai Dao, Hu Shang A Yi, and Mi Xue Bing Cheng, particularly examining their business models and supply chain strategies to identify potential winners in the market [1][4]. Group 1: Business Model Analysis - Gu Ming, Cha Bai Dao, and Hu Shang A Yi were initially regional brands that expanded nationally through a franchise model, with nearly 10,000 stores each by 2024 [4][5]. - The core product offerings of these brands are similar, focusing on fresh milk tea and fresh fruit tea, with prices generally between 10-20 yuan [4][5]. - All four brands utilize a franchise model, generating revenue primarily through franchise fees and sales of ingredients and materials to franchisees [7][11]. Group 2: Supply Chain Comparison - Mi Xue Bing Cheng has the strongest supply chain, leveraging direct sourcing and self-production to minimize costs, while Gu Ming follows closely with a robust supply chain and its own cold chain logistics [13][15]. - Cha Bai Dao and Hu Shang A Yi have weaker supply chains, relying heavily on third-party logistics, which limits their cost control and can lead to quality inconsistencies [16][18]. - The supply chain capabilities significantly impact the brands' resilience during market pressures, with Mi Xue Bing Cheng and Gu Ming showing stability, while Cha Bai Dao and Hu Shang A Yi face declining same-store sales [16][18]. Group 3: Expansion Strategies - Gu Ming employs a unique regional densification strategy, focusing on achieving critical scale within provinces before expanding to neighboring areas, contrasting with the national spread of its competitors [19][20]. - This strategy allows Gu Ming to maintain a high density of stores in key provinces, enhancing supply chain efficiency and reducing logistics costs [24][25]. - Gu Ming's approach has resulted in a significant market share in its initial provinces, with over 25% in Zhejiang, Fujian, and Jiangxi, and a dominant position in the mid-range price segment [28][29]. Group 4: Product Development Strategy - Gu Ming adopts a fast-fashion approach to product development, quickly introducing and iterating on popular items while maintaining a high research and development investment [30][31]. - This strategy allows Gu Ming to respond effectively to changing consumer preferences, achieving a high acceptance rate for new products and a quarterly repurchase rate of 53% [31][32]. - The competitive advantage lies in the ability to provide high-quality products at competitive prices, driven by an efficient supply chain [32][36].

近日，仁怀市应急管理局公布一则行政处罚决定，贵州省仁怀市鹏彦酒业有限公司因未在具有较大危险因素的生产经营场 所设置明显安全警示标志，被处以人民币2.1万元罚款。 公开资料显示，贵州省仁怀市鹏彦酒业有限公司成立于2011-08-18，法定代表人为许鹏，注册资本为9980万元，统一社会 信用代码为91520382580665235Y，企业注册地址位于贵州省遵义市仁怀市茅台镇上坪村，所属行业为酒、饮料和精制茶 制造业。 产经新闻爆料电话：0531-85196566 该处罚决定已于2025年7月1日正式作出，7月2日予以公示，处罚决定书要求鹏彦酒业在2025年10月1日前履行缴纳罚款义 务，相关信息将持续公示至2028年7月2日。 根据处罚决定书（仁怀应急罚〔2025〕9号），2025年5月7日，应急管理局执法人员对该公司进行安全检查时，发现三处 安全隐患：包装车间灌装间：未按规定设置防火、防爆、禁止穿化纤衣服等安全警示标志；露天金属罐区污水收集井：未 纳入有限空间管理台账，未设置有限空间警示标志，且未采取物理隔离措施防止人员进入；停车场内事故收集井：同样未 纳入有限空间管理台账，未设置警示标志，且缺乏物理隔离措施。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Hubei Jianli Grain Wine Co., Ltd. has been fined 28,000 yuan for multiple violations of food safety regulations, including the use of expired geographical indications and misleading labeling on its products [1][4]. Company Information - Hubei Jianli Grain Wine Co., Ltd. was established on September 11, 2002, with a registered capital of 80 million yuan. The legal representative is Cai Jun, and the company is located in the Dong Industrial Park of Jianli County [4][2]. - The company is classified under the food production industry, specifically in the manufacturing of alcoholic beverages [2][4]. Regulatory Actions - The administrative penalty was issued by the Jianli Market Supervision Administration on June 30, 2025, due to violations of the Food Safety Law [1][8]. - The company was found to have produced nine types of liquor products with various labeling issues, including the use of expired geographical indications and false quality grade markings [4][6]. Violations and Penalties - The violations include: 1. Use of expired geographical indications on products sold from 2016 to 2024. 2. Misleading labeling, such as using outdated quality marks and failing to provide essential product information [4][6]. - The total fine of 28,000 yuan includes: - 8,000 yuan for barcode violations. - 20,000 yuan for labeling that does not meet national food safety standards [4][8]. Product Details - Specific products involved in the violations include: 1. "Jianli Grain Wine" (50% vol, 450ml) - 764 units sold. 2. "Jianli Grain Wine" (42% vol, 450ml) - 482 units sold. 3. "Chudu" fragrant liquor (42% vol, 1.5L) - used incorrect barcode. 4. Other products with issues related to labeling and expired patents [6][8].

Manufacturing Sector - The manufacturing PMI for June 2025 is 49.7%, an increase of 0.2 percentage points from the previous month[4] - In June, 11 out of 21 surveyed industries are in the expansion zone, an increase of 4 industries compared to last month[6] - Large enterprises' PMI is 51.2%, up 0.5 percentage points, while small enterprises' PMI is 47.3%, down 2.0 percentage points[11] Supply and Demand - The production index and new orders index are at 51.0% and 50.2%, respectively, both showing increases of 0.3 and 0.4 percentage points[15] - The supply and demand index has rebounded, aligning with seasonal trends, with certain industries like food and beverage showing expansion[15] - Non-metal mineral products and black metal smelting industries continue to contract due to insufficient end demand from the real estate sector[15] Price Index and Procurement - The main raw material purchase price index and factory price index are at 48.4% and 46.2%, both rising by 1.5 percentage points[20] - The procurement index has increased to 50.2%, up 2.6 percentage points, indicating a rise in enterprise procurement activity[21] Non-Manufacturing Sector - The service sector's business activity index is at 50.1%, a slight decrease of 0.1 percentage points, indicating stability[24] - The construction sector's business activity index is 52.8%, up 1.8 percentage points, showing a seasonal rebound but with notable sub-sector differentiation[26] Risks - External disturbances and changes in real estate demand pose risks to the overall economic outlook[30]