Core Viewpoint - The appointment of Yan Xiandong as the head of the People's Bank of China's Survey and Statistics Department marks a significant development, with a focus on enhancing the statistical work related to the financial "Five Major Articles" to support high-quality development [1][3]. Group 1: Appointment and Background - Yan Xiandong has been appointed as the head of the Survey and Statistics Department after a vacancy of over a year, previously serving in various roles within the People's Bank system [1][3]. - His background includes leadership positions in the Ningxia and Inner Mongolia branches of the People's Bank, indicating extensive experience in financial management [3][4]. Group 2: Statistical Work Focus - The statistical work will focus on four key areas: comprehensive implementation of financial "Five Major Articles" statistics, ensuring data quality, providing guidance on statistical systems, and promoting data sharing [1][6]. - The People's Bank has established a coordination mechanism with multiple departments to implement a systematic statistical framework for the financial "Five Major Articles" [7][10]. Group 3: Statistical System and Standards - A new trial statistical system has been jointly issued by the People's Bank and other regulatory bodies, emphasizing comprehensive coverage and unified standards for statistical indicators [6][7]. - The system includes over 200 key statistical indicators covering various financial sectors, ensuring alignment with national standards and existing practices [6][7]. Group 4: Data Quality and Collaboration - Yan emphasizes that data quality is critical for financial statistics, serving as the foundation for accurate financial policy evaluation and decision-making [10]. - The collaboration between financial management departments and institutions is essential to uphold the integrity of data quality throughout the statistical process [10].

Group 1 - The A500 Index ETF has shown strong liquidity with a turnover rate of 6.19% and a transaction volume of 919 million yuan [3] - Over the past two weeks, the A500 Index ETF has seen a significant scale increase of 240 million yuan, ranking second among comparable funds [3] - In terms of shares, the A500 Index ETF has experienced a growth of 30.6 million shares in the past month, also ranking second among comparable funds [3] - The latest net inflow of funds into the A500 Index ETF is 29.11 million yuan, with a total of 129 million yuan net inflow over the last nine trading days [3] - The top ten weighted stocks in the CSI A500 Index account for 21.21% of the index, including major companies like Kweichow Moutai and CATL [3] - From a long-term perspective, the economic fundamentals of China are showing resilience in high-quality development, enhancing the attractiveness of the A-share market for global asset allocation [3] Group 2 - Goldman Sachs maintains a bullish stance on Chinese stocks due to the strengthening of the RMB against the USD, historically correlating with positive performance in the Chinese stock market [4] - The appreciation of the RMB may benefit the Chinese stock market through fundamental factors, risk premiums, and investment flow channels [4] - Investors without stock accounts can access the A-share 500 strong through the CSI A500 ETF linked fund [4]

Group 1 - Hong Kong will maintain the peg of the Hong Kong dollar to the US dollar, while enhancing its position as a global offshore RMB business center, with plans to introduce more RMB products for overseas investors [1] - The US Senate plans to propose significant revisions to Trump's $3 trillion economic plan, aiming for enactment before July 4, despite criticisms from figures like Elon Musk [1] - The New York Fed's survey indicates a decline in US consumer inflation expectations for May, with the one-year expectation dropping from 3.6% to 3.2%, marking the first decline since 2024 [2] Group 2 - Japan's Cabinet Office revised the first quarter GDP contraction to a 0.2% annual rate, better than the initial estimate of 0.7%, which may support the Bank of Japan's cautious stance [2] - The Japanese government is considering repurchasing previously issued ultra-long bonds at low interest rates, in response to rising yields [3] - Japanese investors sold a record ¥1.48 trillion in German sovereign bonds in April, the largest monthly reduction since 2014, and also sold ¥1.07 trillion in US sovereign bonds, the largest reduction since October of the previous year [3] Group 3 - US stock indices closed mixed, with the Dow Jones remaining flat at 42,761.76 points, the S&P 500 rising by 0.09% to 6,005.88 points, and the Nasdaq increasing by 0.31% to 19,591.24 points [4] - US Treasury yields fell across the board, with the 2-year yield down 4.15 basis points to 3.993%, and the 10-year yield down 3.18 basis points to 4.474% [4] Group 4 - International oil prices strengthened, with US crude oil main contract rising by 1.24% to $65.38 per barrel, and Brent crude oil main contract increasing by 0.96% to $67.11 per barrel [5] - The US dollar index fell by 0.19% to 99.01, while non-US currencies generally appreciated against the dollar [5]

点击小程序查看报告原文 Abstract 摘要 在我们跟踪的三个主要的外汇交易策略中，价值策略取代套息策略，成为了今年迄今为止最好的外汇交易策略。而套息策略继去年第三季度之后，在今年 4月份再度遭遇关税的外生冲击，该策略虽然仍为正收益，但高波动令其性价比在2025年显著回落。套息头寸较大的亚洲货币则在5月份继续面临平仓压 力。趋势策略则成为了三大策略中唯一亏损的策略。美元指数虽然从高位下跌了10%，但做空美元的负carry以及汇率短期波动的不确定性让"追涨杀跌"成 为了收益性相对较差的策略。 2025年迄今为止，全球外汇市场围绕着美国政府政策的各种不确定性展开交易。在1月特朗普正式上任后，美元指数在多重利空的影响下下跌了超过 10%。一季度美元的弱势源自于某些政策支票并未兑现所带来的特朗普交易退坡，而从二季度开始，多重利空继续推动美元破位下行。4月2日之后，我们 认为美元的下跌主要源自3方面的交易：一是关税对美国经济的不确定性的影响。与2018年的中美关税摩擦不同，美元指数与关税不确定性在今年4月之后 呈现反向的相关关系。而欧元、日元、瑞郎是规避关税风险的三个主要的避险货币，相对美元走势强劲。二是对"海湖庄园 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - Since May, the bond market has been in a volatile pattern. Despite the implementation of reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate cuts, concerns about bank liabilities have increased, and the Sino-US trade agreement has also put some pressure on long-term bonds. However, the central bank's intention to stabilize funds is clear, and the expectation of restarting bond purchases is rising. In June, the interest rate curve is expected to steepen downward [2]. - Although there are still fluctuations in funds after the reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate cuts, the process of funds rates returning to policy rates continues. In early June, funds have loosened as expected. The central bank's disclosure of the scale and time of outright repurchase is conducive to reducing unnecessary market fluctuations and releasing a signal of stabilizing the funds market. The market believes that the 1 trillion outright reverse repurchase on June 6 also aims to supplement the medium - and long - term liquidity of banks. Whether this is the case depends on whether the central bank conducts another tender within the month. Even without such operations, the bank's liability pressure is expected to ease in June [2]. - Although DR007 was still above 1.5% last week, the overnight rate has dropped to the range of 1.4% - 1.5%. The widening spread between the two may be related to the increase in bank lending. The overnight rate is expected to drop to around 1.4% in June. The inflection point of the certificate of deposit (CD) rate may have appeared and is expected to continue to decline. - The central bank's disclosure of the liquidity injection situation of various tools in May has limited help in judging the subsequent funds situation. The decline in the central bank's claims on the government from January to April may be due to the maturity of short - term bonds without renewal or the closing of short - term bond short - selling positions. Although the central bank's bond - buying cannot be used as a baseline expectation, it is difficult to disprove in the short term, and the decline in short - term interest rates may not be over [2][3]. - Recent high - frequency data shows that the economy has not improved significantly. The sales area of new and second - hand houses has declined, and the prices of black commodities remain weak. The export growth rate in May dropped to 4.8%. Considering the potential increase in domestic fundamental pressure after the peak season, the overall environment for the bond market is still favorable. The short - end decline will also create space for the long - end. In the short term, the curve may continue the bull - steepening trend. It is recommended to maintain a combination of 3 - year policy financial bonds and 10 - year interest - rate bonds and appropriately increase the leverage to hold 3 - 5 - year credit bonds [3]. Summary by Directory I. The central bank sends a signal to stabilize the market. The overnight rate is expected to remain low, and the inflection point of the CD rate may have appeared - Since March, the process of funds rates returning to policy rates has continued. In early June, funds loosened as expected. The central bank's disclosure of the scale and time of outright repurchase can reduce unnecessary market fluctuations and release a signal of stabilizing the funds market [7]. - The 1 trillion outright reverse repurchase on June 6 supplements the medium - term liquidity of banks and is considered beneficial to alleviating the bank's liability pressure. However, considering that 1.2 trillion of outright reverse repurchases will mature in June, whether the central bank has the intention to further supplement liquidity depends on whether it conducts another tender within the month. Even without such operations, the bank's liability pressure is expected to ease in June due to weak credit demand and a marginal decline in government bond supply [10]. - In the first week of June, DR007 remained above 1.5%, while the overnight rate dropped to the range of 1.4% - 1.5%. The central bank seems to pay more attention to controlling the overnight rate, and the overnight rate is expected to drop to around 1.4% in June. With the overnight rate remaining low, the demand for CDs from non - bank institutions has been significantly released, and the CD rate is expected to continue to approach 1.6% [12][15][17]. II. The central bank's bond - buying cannot be used as a baseline expectation, but it is difficult to disprove and still benefits the medium - and short - term bonds - The central bank's disclosure of the "Liquidity Injection and Withdrawal of Central Bank Tools in May 2025" is considered an attempt to increase policy transparency. However, since June 2024, the deviation between the central bank's claims on other depository corporations and high - frequency operations has increased significantly, and the relatively small changes in structural tools in May are difficult to explain this deviation. The relationship between excess reserves and bank lending has also weakened, so the disclosure of monthly information on central bank tools has limited help in judging the subsequent funds situation [21][24]. - The disclosure of the scale of outright bond purchases and sales in the open market may not include maturity and roll - over. The decline in the central bank's claims on the government from January to April may be due to the maturity of short - term bonds without renewal or the closing of short - term bond short - selling positions. Which reason is more likely needs to be observed from whether the relevant accounts continue to decline in May [26][28]. - Although the increase in the net purchase of treasury bonds with a maturity of less than 3 years by large - scale banks last week has led to an increase in the expectation of the central bank restarting bond purchases, it may also be the banks' own operations. The central bank's bond - buying in June cannot be used as a baseline expectation, but this expectation is difficult to disprove in the short term and is still beneficial to medium - and short - term bonds [30]. III. High - frequency data remains weak, and the curve is expected to continue to steepen in June - In May, the manufacturing PMI increased from 49% to 49.5%, slightly stronger than the seasonal pattern, which may be boosted by export - rush factors. However, overall, the recovery speed of production activities is still higher than that of demand, and the new export orders and new order indexes are still below the boom - bust line. The situation of enterprises reducing inventory through price cuts has not changed significantly [32]. - Domestic high - frequency data shows that the economy has not improved significantly. The marginal improvement in new - house sales in May was mainly concentrated in first - tier cities, and the data has weakened recently. The second - hand housing market has also cooled down. Indicators such as the apparent demand for rebar and the cement shipping rate are still at low levels in recent years. Although the Shanghai Export Container Freight Index has risen significantly since late May, the increase in port container volume is not significant. Considering the potential increase in domestic fundamental pressure after the peak season, the overall environment for the bond market is still favorable. The short - end decline will create space for the long - end, and the curve is expected to continue to steepen in June. It is recommended to maintain a combination of 3 - year policy financial bonds and 10 - year interest - rate bonds and appropriately increase the leverage to hold 3 - 5 - year credit bonds [35][48].

| 品种 | 加权利率(%) | 最新利率(%) | 平均回购期限(天) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | DR001 | 1.3770 | 1.3466 | 1 | | DR007 | 1.5126 | 1.4500 | 6.91 | | DR014 | 1.5393 | 1.5500 | 12.75 | | DR021 | 1.5707 | 1.5800 | 18.04 | | DR1M | 1.6822 | 1.7000 | 29.69 | 银行间市场短期利率走低 不仅是DR007变动明显，6月9日，银行间市场七天期质押式回购加权利率（即R007）跌3.85基点至1.4938%，创2024年10月12日以来新低。银行间市场隔夜 质押式回购加权利率早盘跌4.19基点至1.3705%，创2024年12月30日以来新低。 北京商报记者了解到，银行间市场七天期质押式回购加权利率，即R007，是全市场机构（包括银行、券商、基金等）以各类债券（含信用债）为抵押的7天 期回购利率，该数据反映了市场整体流动性水平，受信用风险、抵押品质量影响较大。 与之相关的七天期存款类金融机构质押式回购利率， ...

回踩入场，最怕的就是真反转；突破入场，最怕的就是假突破。 在顺大势下，这些担心的"真反 转"和"假突破"，都已经变为小概率事件。我们不能为小概率事件缩手缩脚，而要为大概率系统严格执 行。 | | | | 银行间资金 | | (2025.06.09) | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 回购代码 | 加权利率 | 变化 | 利率走势 | 量高利率 | 变化 | 成义中 (亿 | 变化量 | 成交量占 | | | (%) | (bp) | (近30天) | (%) | (bp) | 元) | (亿元) | 比 (%) | | R001 | 1.42 | 8 | 11/2 | 2. 00 | 115 | 67710. 16 | 213. 67 | 91.51 | | R007 | 1.54 | -1 | Non/ 1 | 2. 05 | 0 | 5248. 91 | -894. 45 | 7.09 | | R014 | 1.59 | -1 | 1 /VI | 2. 00 | 218 | 759. 37 | 115. 90 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the continuous deepening of China's green finance system, with local pilot projects accelerating, market scale steadily expanding, and innovative products emerging, providing strong financial support for the "dual carbon" goals [1]. Group 1: Policy Dynamics - In the first five months of 2025, numerous green finance policies were introduced, with central and local efforts working in tandem to accelerate the formation of a multi-level green finance system [2]. - Shanghai has established a "1+N+X" green finance organizational structure, while Jiangsu has launched a "1+N+N" transformation financial support directory targeting eight high-carbon industries [2]. - The National Development and Reform Commission released a new version of the "Green Technology Promotion Directory," covering 112 low-carbon technologies [2]. - China successfully issued 6 billion yuan in green sovereign bonds on the London Stock Exchange, indicating strong international market recognition of Chinese green assets [2]. Group 2: Market Data - In the first five months of 2025, China's green finance market maintained high activity levels, with 236 new green bonds issued, totaling 411.03 billion yuan [3]. - The balance of green loans reached 40.61 trillion yuan by the end of March 2025, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 34.2% [3]. - The national carbon market saw a trading volume of 22.74 million tons and a transaction value of 1.751 billion yuan from January to May [4]. Group 3: Innovation and Product Diversification - In May 2025, several innovative green finance products were launched, including the first "green + rural revitalization + dual basin" labeled bond [5]. - Agricultural Development Bank introduced the "twin green bond" mechanism, exploring market comparisons between green and ordinary bonds [5]. - Industrial and Commercial Bank launched a multi-currency carbon-neutral offshore bond, focusing on clean transportation and renewable energy projects [5]. Group 4: Outlook - Green finance is becoming a key engine for high-quality economic development, with expectations for further advancements in climate investment and financing trials, unified ESG standards, and continuous industrialization of green technologies [6][7].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - This week (from June 3rd to June 6th), the money market rate declined, the average daily net lending of large - scale banks increased, and the leverage ratio of funds slightly rose. The net financing of certificates of deposit decreased, and the yields to maturity of certificates of deposit with different maturities showed differentiation. In the cash bond trading, the main buyers were other product types, mainly increasing holdings of certificates of deposit. Rural commercial banks switched to increasing holdings of certificates of deposit, insurance companies increased holdings of ultra - long - term interest - rate bonds with maturities of 15 - 30 years, funds increased holdings of interest - rate bonds across all maturities, and large - scale banks bought interest - rate bonds with maturities of 1 - 3 years. [3] 3. Summaries Based on Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Money and Capital Market - A total of 1602.6 billion yuan of reverse repurchase expired this week. The central bank conducted reverse repurchases of 454.5 billion, 214.9 billion, 126.5 billion, and 135 billion yuan from Tuesday to Friday, with a total injection of 930.9 billion yuan and a net liquidity withdrawal of 671.7 billion yuan for the whole week. [5][10] - As of June 6th, R001, R007, DR001, and DR007 were 1.45%, 1.55%, 1.41%, and 1.53% respectively, with changes of - 11.9BP, - 14.58BP, - 6.98BP, and - 13.22BP compared to May 30th, and were at the 19%, 9%, 16%, and 3% historical quantiles respectively. [5][12] - The net borrowing scale of the main fund lenders increased. The main lending institutions (large - scale commercial/policy banks and joint - stock commercial banks) had a net borrowing of - 341.2 billion yuan for the whole week, an increase of 284.3 billion yuan compared to the previous week. [5][17] - The trading volume of pledged repurchase increased, with an average daily trading volume of 7.5 trillion yuan and a maximum single - day trading volume of 7.86 trillion yuan, a 15.42% increase compared to the previous week's average daily volume. The proportion of overnight repurchase transactions increased, with an average daily proportion of 87.5% and a maximum single - day proportion of 90.4%, a 3.61 - percentage - point increase compared to the previous week's average daily proportion. [5][24] - The leverage ratio of broad - based funds slightly increased. As of June 6th, the leverage ratios of banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and broad - based funds were 103.3%, 202.5%, 127.1%, and 105.4% respectively, with changes of 0.41BP, 14.27BP, - 0.68BP, and 0.1BP compared to May 30th, and were at the 17%, 17%, 60%, and 39% historical quantiles respectively. [5][28] 3.2 Certificates of Deposit and Bills - This week, the issuance scale of certificates of deposit decreased, and the net financing amount decreased compared to the previous week. The total issuance was 585.59 billion yuan, a decrease of 82.91 billion yuan compared to the previous week; the total maturity was 664.37 billion yuan, an increase of 11.64 billion yuan compared to the previous week. The net financing amount was - 78.78 billion yuan, a decrease of 94.55 billion yuan compared to the previous week. [5][32] - By bank type, city commercial banks had the highest issuance scale. This week, the issuance scales of certificates of deposit by state - owned banks, joint - stock banks, city commercial banks, and rural commercial banks were 151.88 billion, 161.56 billion, 223.54 billion, and 44.51 billion yuan respectively, with changes of - 214.34 billion, 69.4 billion, 45.4 billion, and 14.02 billion yuan compared to the previous week. [32] - By maturity type, the 6 - month issuance scale was the highest. The issuance scales of 1 - month, 3 - month, 6 - month, 9 - month, and 1 - year certificates of deposit were 44.1 billion, 133.53 billion, 236.64 billion, 88.58 billion, and 122.43 billion yuan respectively, with changes of - 311.5 billion, 443.3 billion, 929.5 billion, 806.6 billion, and - 2697 billion yuan compared to the previous week. [33] - This week, the issuance interest rates of certificates of deposit by different banks and with different maturities showed differentiation. By bank type, as of June 6th, the issuance interest rates of 1 - year certificates of deposit by joint - stock banks and city commercial banks changed by 0BP and - 2.83BP respectively compared to May 30th, and were at the 2% and 1% historical quantiles. By maturity, as of June 6th, the issuance interest rates of 1 - month, 3 - month, and 6 - month certificates of deposit changed by 2.64BP, 4.13BP, and - 5.23BP respectively compared to May 30th, and were at the 6%, 2%, and 1% historical quantiles. [41] - This week, the Shibor rates generally declined. As of June 6th, the overnight, 1 - week, 2 - week, 1 - month, and 3 - month Shibor rates changed by - 6BP, - 11.7BP, - 15.1BP, - 0.1BP, and - 0.1BP respectively compared to May 30th, reaching 1.41%, 1.5%, 1.59%, 1.62%, and 1.65%. [43] - This week, the yield - to - maturity curve of certificates of deposit flattened. As of June 6th, the yield - to - maturities of AAA - rated ChinaBond commercial bank certificates of deposit with maturities of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year were 1.63%, 1.66%, 1.65%, 1.68%, and 1.68% respectively, with changes of 8.49BP, - 0.52BP, - 3BP, - 3BP, and - 2.75BP compared to May 30th. [45] - This week, the bill interest rates showed differentiation. As of June 3rd, the 3 - month direct discount rate, 3 - month transfer discount rate, 6 - month direct discount rate, and 6 - month transfer discount rate of state - owned shares were 1.15%, 1.02%, 1.14%, and 1.09% respectively, with changes of - 5BP, - 14BP, 0BP, and 3BP compared to May 30th. [46] 3.3 Institutional Behavior Tracking - This week, the main buyers of cash bonds were other product types, with a net purchase of 8.92 billion yuan, a decrease compared to the previous week's purchase scale; the main sellers were joint - stock banks, with a net sale of 22.38 billion yuan, an increase compared to the previous week's sale scale. [5][48] - This week, funds had a net purchase of 7.84 billion yuan of cash bonds, including an increase of 5.3 billion yuan in interest - rate bonds, 1.5533 billion yuan in credit bonds, 750 million yuan in other (including Tier 2 and perpetual bonds), and 210 million yuan in certificates of deposit. By maturity, interest - rate bonds were mainly increased in the 3 - 5 - year range, and credit bonds were mainly increased within 1 year. [5][48] - This week, wealth management products had a net purchase of 4.61 billion yuan of cash bonds, including an increase of 720 million yuan in interest - rate bonds, 1.04 billion yuan in credit bonds, 850 million yuan in other (including Tier 2 and perpetual bonds), and 2 billion yuan in certificates of deposit. By maturity, interest - rate bonds and credit bonds were mainly increased within 1 year. [5][50] - This week, rural financial institutions had a net purchase of 3.99 billion yuan of cash bonds, including a decrease of 2.19 billion yuan in interest - rate bonds, an increase of 80 million yuan in credit bonds, 360 million yuan in other (including Tier 2 and perpetual bonds), and 5.73 billion yuan in certificates of deposit. By maturity, interest - rate bonds were mainly decreased in the 1 - 3 - year range, and credit bonds were mainly increased within 1 year. [50] - This week, insurance companies had a net purchase of 4.31 billion yuan of cash bonds, including an increase of 3.23 billion yuan in interest - rate bonds, 380 million yuan in credit bonds, a decrease of 210 million yuan in other (including Tier 2 and perpetual bonds), and 900 million yuan in certificates of deposit. By maturity, interest - rate bonds were mainly increased in the 20 - 30 - year range, and credit bonds were mainly increased in the 3 - 5 - year range. [50]

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - Since 2024, the supply pattern of the credit bond market has been reshaped, with industrial bonds and secondary and perpetual (Er Yong) bonds replacing urban investment bonds as the main forces, showing significant structural characteristics. In 2025, affected by multiple factors such as market fluctuations and stricter regulations, the supply of credit bonds has slightly decreased year-on-year. The supply of industrial bonds remains high, but the supply of ultra-long-term bonds has declined. The supply of Er Yong bonds has increased to some extent, with state-owned large commercial banks as the main issuers. The supply of urban investment bonds is still restricted, and the real estate financing remains sluggish. The highlight of this year's supply is the science and technology innovation bonds, which have been extended to financial institutions and the issuance has accelerated. [1][11][12] - Looking forward to the second half of the year, the overall supply may be flat, and the net supply may still be dominated by central and local state-owned enterprise industrial bonds and national and joint-stock Er Yong bonds. Attention should be paid to the expansion of science and technology innovation bonds. In the long term, the core of credit supply growth lies in the recovery of real financing demand. [31] Summary by Directory Credit Hotspots: Credit Bond Supply Characteristics - From 2020 to 2023, urban investment bonds were the main contributor to the credit bond market. After the release of the "Document 35" in 2023, under the strict supervision of urban investment bonds, the net financing amount decreased significantly. In 2024, due to the continuous evolution of the asset shortage, the supply of industrial bonds increased, especially the issuance of long-term varieties over 10 years. [11] - As of May 31, 2025, the net financing amount of credit bonds was 10,824 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 19.4%. Industrial bonds are still the main force in credit bond supply, and the issuance entities continue to concentrate on high-quality ones. The real estate bond market is still in the process of repair and adjustment, and the net financing amount remains at a relatively low level. The supply of urban investment bonds is limited under continuous strict supervision and debt resolution. The supply of Er Yong bonds has increased, with state-owned large commercial banks as the main issuers. [12] - In 2025, the net financing amount of industrial bonds is lower than the same period last year, with a year-on-year decrease of 9.12%. The supply of industrial bonds is mainly within 3 years, and the net supply of industrial bonds over 10 years has decreased significantly. The supply of Er Yong bonds has decreased year-on-year, and joint-stock banks have become the main supply force. [14][19] - In May 2025, the issuance of science and technology innovation bonds accelerated, with a monthly issuance of over 350 billion yuan, a record high. Structurally, financial science and technology innovation bonds accounted for 62%, mainly commercial bank bonds, and non-financial enterprise science and technology innovation bonds accounted for 38%, mainly central and local state-owned enterprises. [31] Market Review: The Central Bank Announced Trillion-Level Reverse Repurchase Operations, and Er Yong Bonds Performed Relatively Stronger - From May 30 to June 6, 2025, the central bank announced a 1-trillion-yuan outright reverse repurchase operation at the beginning of the month, and the money market was loose. Interest rate bonds strengthened, while corporate credit bonds showed mixed performance. The short-term yields of corporate credit bonds increased slightly, the medium and long-term yields of medium and low-grade bonds performed relatively well, and most of the spreads were passively widened. The yields of Er Yong bonds decreased by about 3BP, and the short-term spreads decreased slightly. [2][36] - Last week, the buying volume continued to increase, with wealth management products net buying 10.4 billion yuan and funds net buying 15.5 billion yuan. The median spreads of public bonds in various industries increased by about 1BP, and the median spreads of urban investment bonds in various provinces showed mixed performance, with the spreads in Guizhou decreasing significantly. [2][36] Primary Issuance: Overall Issuance Declined Due to Holiday Factors, and Most Issuance Interest Rates Increased - From June 3 to June 6, 2025, the total issuance of corporate credit bonds was 196.5 billion yuan, a month-on-month decrease of 31%, and the total issuance of financial credit bonds was 19 billion yuan, a significant month-on-month decrease of 90%. The total net financing was 49 billion yuan, including a net repayment of 12 billion yuan for urban investment bonds and a net financing of 62.9 billion yuan for industrial bonds. The total net financing of financial credit bonds was 10.3 billion yuan. [3][57] - Affected by holiday factors, the issuance of both corporate and financial credit bonds decreased. In terms of issuance interest rates, the issuance interest rates of medium and short-term notes, except for AAA, showed an upward trend, and the average issuance interest rates of corporate bonds, except for AA+, also showed an upward trend. [3][57] Secondary Trading: Medium and Short-Term Maturities Were Actively Traded, and the Trading of Long-Term Maturities Decreased Slightly - The actively traded entities are mainly medium and high-grade, medium and short-term, and central and local state-owned enterprises. In terms of types, the actively traded entities of urban investment bonds are mainly divided into two categories: one is the mainstream high-grade platforms in economically strong provinces such as Jiangsu and Guangdong; the other is the core main platforms in relatively high-spread areas of large economic provinces (such as Shandong, Chongqing, and Sichuan). The actively traded entities of real estate bonds are still mainly AAA, and the trading maturities are mostly within 1 - 3 years. The actively traded entities of private enterprise bonds are also mainly AAA, and the trading maturities are mostly medium and short-term. [4][67] - Among the actively traded urban investment bonds, the trading volume of bonds with a maturity of over 5 years accounted for 3%, a slight decrease compared with the previous week (4%). [4][67]