1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The cost of imported beans has increased, and it is expected that the prices of bean products will bottom out and rebound. Specifically, the price centers of CBOT soybeans, soybean No. 2, soybean meal, and soybean oil are expected to move slightly upward in November, while the price of soybean No. 1 is expected to operate within a narrow range [8]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 International Bean Market Analysis 3.1.1 CBOT Soybean Market - In 2025, the price of CBOT soybeans fluctuated. It was affected by factors such as USDA reports, South American weather, planting area adjustments, and biodiesel policies. In October, the price found strong support at 1000 cents per bushel and then rallied. It is expected to stabilize above 1100 cents per bushel in November and continue to rise slightly [15][16][108]. - The net non - commercial long positions in CBOT soybeans indicate strong bullish sentiment, and the price is expected to remain strong [19]. - There is a risk of La Nina, which is expected to last until December 2025 - February 2026 and may transition to an ENSO neutral state in 2026 [29]. - The current good - to - excellent rate of US soybeans is lower than last year's level, and it is expected that the high - yield estimate of 53.5 bushels per acre will be revised downwards, which will support the price of CBOT soybeans [33]. - The old - crop inventory of US soybeans has decreased, and the new - crop planting area has been reduced. The new - crop supply - demand balance is expected to tighten, which is bullish for CBOT soybeans [40][54]. - The US soybean crushing volume has reached record highs, indicating strong domestic demand [44]. - The US soybean crushing profit has decreased compared to the same period last year, while the soybean crushing profit in Brazil's Mato Grosso state has increased compared to the same period last year. Brazil's soybean crushing profit is good, and the basis is expected to remain firm [49]. 3.1.2 South American Bean Market - Brazil's soybean planting progress is in line with the same period last year, and the harvest area is expected to increase. Brazil's soybean production has been increasing in recent years, which competes with US soybeans. The export potential of Brazilian soybeans is expected to increase in the 2025/26 season, and the supply - demand balance is expected to be more relaxed [62][66][70]. - Argentina's soybean supply - demand balance has tightened slightly this year, and the government's tariff policy has an impact on the international bean market [77]. - The basis of South American soybeans is expected to remain firm due to factors such as reduced export potential in Brazil and good domestic crushing profits [81]. 3.1.3 Global Bean and Oilseed Market - Global oilseed production has been increasing, mainly driven by the continuous increase in South American soybean production [85]. - The US biodiesel policy has uncertainties, and there is a risk that the policy may not be fully implemented, which may affect the demand for US soybeans [97]. - The global soybean supply - demand balance shows that the inventory - to - consumption ratio decreased in the 2025/26 season due to the expected decline in US soybean production and strong demand, which is bullish for global bean prices [101]. 3.2 Domestic Bean Market Analysis 3.2.1 Dalian Commodity Exchange Bean Futures Market - The price of Dalian Commodity Exchange (DCE) soybean meal has fluctuated. In 2025, it was affected by factors such as US soybean production, South American supply, and biodiesel policies. Currently, the price is supported by increased import costs, but the upward momentum is weak. It is expected to trade in a narrow range around 3000 - 3100 yuan per ton in November [114][219]. - The price of DCE soybean oil has also fluctuated. Although the current inventory is at a historical high, the expected reduction in oilseed imports in the fourth quarter and the slowdown in palm oil inventory accumulation are expected to support the price, and it is expected to stop falling and rise after recent adjustments [8][120]. - The price of DCE soybean No. 1 has been affected by factors such as domestic production, purchase sentiment, and Sino - US trade negotiations. It is expected to operate in a narrow range in November [8][201]. - The price of DCE soybean No. 2 is expected to rise slightly in November due to increased import costs, while the commercial import of US soybeans is not very active due to negative crushing margins [8][209]. 3.2.2 Domestic Bean Supply and Demand - The profit of domestic soybean crushing has narrowed, which may reduce the enthusiasm of oil mills for importing soybeans and limit the downward space of downstream oil and meal prices [129]. - In the third quarter, the arrival of South American soybeans increased, and the inventory of coastal soybeans, soybean meal, and soybean oil has accumulated. Currently, the export potential of Brazilian soybeans has declined, and the basis is high. The willingness of oil mills to actively import US soybeans is weak due to poor crushing margins [132]. - As of October 24, 2025, the national port soybean inventory was 973.1 million tons, the domestic main oil - mill soybean meal inventory was 105.46 million tons, and the national key - area commercial soybean oil inventory was 125.03 million tons [137][141][149]. - The import volume of domestic soybean oil has decreased due to high inventory, and the impact on domestic prices is limited. The import volume of domestic soybean meal is very small and has little impact on domestic prices [152][154]. 3.2.3 Domestic Feed and Livestock Market - The profit of pig farming is poor, the growth rate of the sow inventory has slowed down, the inventory of laying hens has stopped increasing and adjusted, and the demand for soybean meal in the feed industry is expected to decrease in the fourth quarter [164][171][175]. 3.3 Bean Operation Opportunity Analysis No relevant content provided. 3.4 Seasonal Analysis and Market Judgment - Each type of bean product has different price trends and influencing factors in different seasons. Overall, the prices of bean products are affected by factors such as supply and demand, import costs, and policies. In November, it is necessary to pay attention to factors such as US soybean exports, biodiesel policies, and the progress of South American soybean planting [8].

Trade Relations - The meeting between Presidents Trump and Xi resulted in a trade truce, with the U.S. cutting fentanyl tariffs from 20% to 10%, leading to a cumulative tariff on China of 47% [3][4] - China has committed to purchasing soybeans, although no specific dollar amount or tonnage was provided, creating uncertainty in the grain market [5][6] - China is expected to reopen rare earth exports for one year and potentially reduce chemicals needed for fentanyl production [4][8] Market Reactions - The market reaction has been mixed, with some fluctuations in equity and commodity markets following the meeting [10][13] - Rare earth stocks are experiencing varied performance, with MP Materials down approximately 0.7% [14] - The agricultural sector is under scrutiny, particularly regarding China's past failures to meet soybean purchase commitments under previous agreements [11][12] Energy Sector - There are discussions about China potentially buying U.S. oil, especially from Alaska, but current inventory levels in China are high, leading to skepticism about immediate purchases [21][22] - OPEC Plus may increase production due to supply disruptions from Russian sanctions, aiming to regain market share and manage U.S. shale production [24] - Geopolitical dynamics, including military movements in Venezuela, could impact oil resources and OPEC Plus's influence [25][26]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the unexpected halt in the escalation of the US-China trade war, particularly the withdrawal of the proposed "100% tariffs" on Chinese goods by the US Treasury Secretary after intense negotiations in Kuala Lumpur [1][3][17] - The immediate market reaction saw a 3% spike in US soybean futures, indicating the agricultural sector's sensitivity to trade tensions [3] - The trade conflict's turning point was foreshadowed by alarming data from the US Department of Agriculture, which reported a complete halt in Chinese purchases of US soybeans, significantly impacting US soybean inventories [5][7] Group 2 - The US Soybean Association's president issued a severe warning about the implications of the trade war on the agricultural sector, particularly affecting Trump's political base in the Midwest [8] - As the 2026 midterm elections approach, the discontent among farmers poses a significant threat to Trump's political foundation, highlighting the political stakes involved in the trade negotiations [10] - On October 9, China announced export controls on rare earth materials and technologies, marking a significant escalation in the trade conflict and impacting critical supply chains for US high-tech and military industries [11][15] Group 3 - China's rare earth export controls could severely disrupt the supply chains of essential technologies, including those used in military applications, as over 90% of rare earth processing occurs in China [13][15] - The Trump administration faces a dilemma between addressing farmer losses and maintaining national security, indicating limited options for the US government in the trade negotiations [17] - Recent data from China's Ministry of Commerce shows a significant increase in foreign investment, with a 16.2% year-on-year rise in new foreign enterprises established in the first three quarters of 2025, reflecting strong global confidence in China's market [19][21] Group 4 - The influx of foreign capital into China is directed towards high-tech sectors, such as renewable energy and advanced manufacturing, rather than low-end manufacturing, indicating a strategic shift in investment [23][25] - The substantial surplus in foreign exchange settlements in September, reaching $51 billion, underscores the growing attractiveness of Chinese assets amid ongoing trade tensions [23][25] - The "ceasefire" in Kuala Lumpur is viewed as a strategic pause rather than a resolution, allowing China to regroup and focus on achieving breakthroughs in critical technology sectors [29][31]

Core Insights - The latest round of US-China trade talks in Kuala Lumpur concluded early with a "substantial framework agreement," and the US announced it would no longer consider imposing a 100% tariff on Chinese goods [1][3][20] Group 1: US-China Trade Negotiations - The negotiations, initially planned for three days, wrapped up in two, indicating a significant breakthrough in discussions [1] - Key topics included rare earth exports, agricultural tariffs, and fentanyl control, with China maintaining a firm stance during the talks [3][5] - The US Treasury Secretary's announcement to abandon the 100% tariff plan reflects a retreat in response to China's strong position [3][16] Group 2: Impact on Commodities - Rare earth elements and soybeans emerged as critical issues, with China controlling over 90% of global rare earth processing capabilities, leading to soaring prices for US metals [5][6] - The US soybean market faced severe disruptions, with imports from China plummeting by 97% in a week, causing protests among American farmers [6][12] Group 3: Broader Geopolitical Implications - Following the US-China talks, India announced it would cease purchasing oil from sanctioned Russian companies, signaling a shift towards the US [8] - Brazil's President Lula met with Trump to initiate tariff negotiations, aiming to resolve trade tensions that have cost Brazil over $1 billion annually due to high tariffs on key exports [10][12] - The interconnected nature of these negotiations suggests a ripple effect, with each country's actions influencing the others, highlighting the complexity of global trade dynamics [20]

Group 1 - The U.S. government is currently facing a shutdown that has lasted for 22 days, marking the second-longest government shutdown in U.S. history, affecting 800,000 federal employees who are on unpaid leave [3][4] - Many federal employees are seeking assistance from food relief organizations due to delayed salaries, with over 370 families requesting help, which is more than double the initial expectations [3] - The economic impact of the trade war with China has resulted in American consumers paying over $100 billion more due to increased prices on imported goods, averaging an additional $1,300 per household [4][6] Group 2 - The manufacturing sector is experiencing significant challenges due to increased input costs from tariffs, leading to reduced output and competitiveness, particularly in the automotive and electronics industries [6] - The agricultural sector has been severely affected, with U.S. soybean exports to China dropping to zero, resulting in farmers facing bankruptcy or relying on government subsidies, which are currently unavailable due to fiscal constraints [6] - The U.S. national debt is projected to exceed $37 trillion by September 2025, indicating a critical fiscal situation that limits government support for affected sectors [6] Group 3 - China holds a strategic advantage in the rare earth market, controlling 75% of the global supply, which is crucial for U.S. military and high-tech industries, creating pressure on the Trump administration [7][9] - The Chinese government has reiterated its stance against high tariffs, emphasizing that threats will not lead to concessions, reflecting confidence in its position [9] - The ongoing trade war has not produced any winners, and cooperation is suggested as the only viable solution moving forward [9]

Core Insights - The article highlights the contradictions in Trump's tariff strategy, which aims to create "fair competition" with China while planning to impose an additional 100% tariff on top of the existing average 30% tariff, leading to a total tariff rate of 154% after a temporary pause in November [1] - The immediate impact of these tariffs has resulted in a 1.7% increase in price levels in the U.S., equating to an annual income loss of $2,400 for each American household, with significant price surges in leather goods and clothing by 36% and 34% respectively [1] - The U.S. stock market reacted sharply to the announcement of the 100% tariff, with major indices experiencing a rapid decline, resulting in a $2 trillion loss in market capitalization, which only stabilized after negotiations were hinted at [1] Trade Dynamics - U.S. trading partners are actively restructuring their trade relationships in response to the tariffs, with Canada increasing automobile imports from Mexico, and China shifting its soybean procurement focus to South America [1] - Countries like Peru are redirecting their blueberry exports away from the U.S. towards Asia, while Lesotho, reliant on U.S. textile orders, is now focusing on markets in Asia, Europe, and Africa [1] - A coalition of 14 countries, including New Zealand and Singapore, has formed partnerships to collectively mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. needs to develop a comprehensive strategy beyond just rare earth mining to effectively counter China's influence in critical minerals and supply chains [1][3][11]. Group 1: Rare Earths and Critical Minerals - Australia is the fourth largest country in terms of rare earth and critical mineral deposits, making it a key player in the U.S. strategy [2]. - The U.S. exports rare earths to China, highlighting the need for a focus on refining capabilities, which Australia possesses through its largest refiner outside of China [3][4]. - Recent reports indicate that China's rare earth exports fell in September, and for the first time in seven years, China did not import soybeans from the U.S. in the previous month [5]. Group 2: Trade Relations and Supply Chains - There is potential for a short-term deal between the U.S. and China, which may involve concessions from the U.S. to resume soybean exports in exchange for a delay in China's rare earth controls [6][7]. - The long-term challenge for the U.S. lies in a broad range of supply chains, as China continues to build its control mechanisms beyond rare earths [8][11]. - The U.S. has significant mineral reserves and can collaborate with allies like Australia and Japan to enhance its supply chain resilience [9][10]. Group 3: China's Long-Term Strategy - China has a long-term strategy to build up its production capacity, particularly in advanced technology, which could exert more pressure on the U.S. regarding geopolitical issues like Taiwan [14][15][16]. - The timeline for China's self-sufficiency and production capabilities is uncertain, but it is a critical factor for the U.S. to consider in its strategic planning [13][15].

Oil Market Insights - Current crude oil prices around $57 per barrel are near the US production break-even cost, with the US now being a net exporter of energy, including crude oil, ethanol, and LNG, amidst declining global demand, particularly from China [1] - The oil market is experiencing a surplus, with over 1 billion barrels accumulated in the world's tanker fleet, indicating a significant excess supply [2] - The ongoing cycle in the oil market suggests a trend towards lower prices due to excess supply, with crude oil prices down approximately 20% this year while the S&P 500 is up nearly 20% [5] Commodity Trends - The disparity between gold and crude oil prices is at a historical high, with gold up 65% and crude oil down 20%, marking the largest difference in 100 years [6][7] - The soybean market is facing similar challenges as crude oil, with increased production incentivized by high prices in 2022, leading to a surplus and lower prices [8] - China has shifted its soybean imports away from the US, now sourcing primarily from Brazil, which is impacting US soybean prices, currently hovering around $10 per bushel [9][10] Production and Pricing Dynamics - The cost of soybean production in the US is estimated at around $9.75 per bushel, indicating potential pressure on US farmers as prices may continue to decline [12] - The overall trend in both oil and soybean markets points towards a "low price cure," which could lead to economic challenges for producers, particularly US farmers [12]

Group 1 - The competition between China and the US has evolved beyond traditional trade disputes into a complex struggle involving national resources, political instability, and technological innovation [1] - China's recent decision to tighten rare earth export controls is framed as a national security and sustainable resource management measure, but it also reflects strategic considerations [4][5] - The US's initial restrained response to China's export management has shifted to criticism, revealing a sense of vulnerability in its strategic approach to China [3][5] Group 2 - The US's reliance on rare earth elements, crucial for high-tech industries, particularly in military and renewable energy sectors, highlights its dependency on China [4] - The US's previous "decoupling" strategy in the rare earth sector has not yielded significant results, exposing its weaknesses in securing alternative suppliers [5] - Domestic pressures in the US, including protests against concentrated presidential power and government shutdowns, are linked to the broader context of US-China competition [7][8] Group 3 - The US's agricultural sector, particularly soybean farmers, faces challenges due to reduced Chinese imports, leading to increased dissatisfaction among Trump's voter base [8][10] - Trump's strategy of urging China to purchase more soybeans appears ineffective, as the US market's dependency on certain Chinese products is not as strong as perceived [10] - In contrast, China is focusing on technological innovation, with significant breakthroughs in chip development indicating a shift towards self-reliance in critical technologies [10] Group 4 - The ongoing US-China competition is deepening into resource control, technological rivalry, and institutional resilience, with implications for future global dominance [12] - The US is experiencing dual pressures from domestic political challenges and external competition, constraining its policy options [12] - China's strategic approach involves leveraging technology, institutional advantages, and global cooperation to navigate challenges and expand its development space [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the significant decline in U.S. soybean exports to China, which has dropped to zero, raising alarms within the industry and prompting potential government intervention to support affected farmers [2][4]. Group 1: Impact on U.S. Soybean Industry - The U.S. Soybean Association's president indicated that the zero procurement from China is a critical issue for the industry, warranting the highest level of concern [2][4]. - Historically, China has been the largest buyer of U.S. grains, accounting for approximately 25% of total U.S. grain exports [4]. - The current soybean harvest season, which runs from September to November, has begun without any orders from China, contrasting with previous years [4]. Group 2: Shift in Procurement Sources - In response to the trade tensions, China has significantly reduced its purchases of U.S. soybeans, with Brazilian soybeans now making up 70% of China's total soybean imports [4]. - China has also diversified its soybean procurement channels to include countries like Argentina [4]. Group 3: Government Response - The Trump administration is considering implementing a subsidy policy to assist soybean farmers affected by the lack of Chinese orders [4].