据封面新闻报道，7月16日下午起，杭州余杭区良渚街道多个小区的业主发帖称，家中自来 水出现异味。有人形容是下水道味，有人说是死鱼烂虾味等臭味。 受访者供图 "16日晚上8点多，看到小区群里在说水臭了。我回家打开水龙头，果然臭得不行。"吴先生 告诉记者，他在主卧卫生间里打开水龙头，整个房间都闻得到异味，"没法洗澡，也不敢用 这个水煮饭喝水，附近的矿泉水都被人抢光了。" 7月17日，余杭水务发布通报。"首先，对此次水质事件带来的不便深表歉意。7月16日， 我司切换水源，仁和水厂主管网恢复正常后，目前已完成对各支管和二供水箱的冲洗。经检 测，仁和街道、良渚街道的水质已经恢复，用户可以正常使用。在使用前，请用户对'存 水'进行排放。为弥补用户损失，我司将会给予7月份每户5吨水费的减免。" 据第一帮帮团，7月17日下午，记者致电余杭环境水务集团热线电话，针对网上说"粪水管 接错导致污染"，工作人员表示这些都是谣言。"这个水闻起来是有一股味道，这是一个嗅 味指标异常的情况，但其他指标都是正常的。水质整体是清澈干净的，只是这个水有味 道。" 该工作人员表示，污水原因仍在调查中，因为牵扯范围较大，当地林水局、生态环境局已介 ...

著名相声演员杨少华7月9日不幸离世，享年94岁。7月18日，有媒体报道称，杨少华的儿子杨议在前一天的直播中透露，"老爷子剩的现 金不少，有那么四个亿，哥儿四个，正好一人一亿就分了，其他的人就别惦记了。" 这段话经由直播切片传开后，引发网友热议，#杨少华遗产四个亿哥四个一人一亿#话题随即冲上热搜。 杨议哭笑不 得地回应说，这只是他昨天直播时说的一句玩笑话，没想到会被当真。他反问大家：一个说相声的，怎么可能挣4个亿，"哪儿 有那么多钱？说相声都挣4个亿，还了得？"他还顺手指着自己正在售卖的肉酱开玩笑说，"把这些酱卖完了，就凑4个亿了。" 0-8 (T the " a " ally property . 政协议相声部分4个区工了得 1993 E 加我粉丝团 1 · . e 你把这点管家了 8 (T 直播中，也有网友留言表示，老爷子刚走，杨议不应该这么快就开始直播带货。对此， 他坦然表示，父亲是寿终正寝，已经离开快10天 了，大家的生活也要慢慢进入正轨。 来源：极目新闻 更多财经视频，请关注视频号"新浪财经" 往期回顾 7月18日晚，杨议又开直播，原本是要卖货，却被连绵不断的弹幕追问有关"4亿遗产"的事儿。 IP e ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's unexpected announcement that Coca-Cola will consider using cane sugar as a sweetener in the U.S., which has sparked significant public interest and debate about the implications of this change [2][3]. Group 1: Coca-Cola's Sweetener History - Coca-Cola originally used cane sugar in its formula since the 19th century but switched to high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in the late 1970s due to cost factors [3][13]. - The U.S. market has seen a long-standing preference for HFCS due to government subsidies for corn, making it cheaper than cane sugar [16][27]. Group 2: Political and Economic Implications - Trump's push for Coca-Cola to revert to cane sugar is seen as a move that could disrupt the established corn syrup industry, which has significant political backing [26][27]. - The potential switch to cane sugar could lead to increased costs for Coca-Cola, affecting product pricing and possibly leading to job losses in the corn syrup sector [26][27]. Group 3: Consumer Preferences and Health Concerns - Many consumers still associate cane sugar with a more authentic taste, despite the long-term use of HFCS in the U.S. [20][24]. - There are ongoing debates about the health implications of HFCS versus cane sugar, with some studies linking HFCS to obesity and other health issues [23][24]. Group 4: Market Variations - Coca-Cola uses different sweeteners in various markets based on local costs and consumer preferences, with cane sugar being favored in regions like Mexico due to lower costs [15][16]. - The article highlights that the choice of sweetener is largely driven by economic factors rather than purely consumer health concerns [15][27].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around a woman who underwent annual health check-ups for 10 years without any cancer detection, only to be diagnosed with late-stage cancer later, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the health screening process [2][3] - Aikang Group stated that cancer detection depends on various factors including the timing of the tests, methods used, and the expertise of the medical professionals involved, indicating that some cancers may not be detectable at certain times [2][3] - Aikang Group plans to collaborate with a third-party authority to analyze the situation and validate the accuracy of the health check results provided to the individual [2][3] Group 2 - The woman, Zhang Xiaoling, reported that her cancer marker tests had consistently shown normal results over the years, but a later examination revealed abnormalities leading to a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma [3] - The incident has prompted legal action from Zhang against Aikang Group, alleging potential oversight or misdiagnosis in her health assessments [3]

Core Viewpoint - The investigation into the construction of the Niulang and Zhinu sculpture in Lushan County, which cost 7.15 million yuan, revealed significant issues in project decision-making, regulatory oversight, and inflated pricing, leading to disciplinary actions against responsible officials [1][2][4]. Group 1: Project Decision Issues - The investigation found that the Lushan County Party Committee and government exhibited non-standard decision-making and inadequate supervision during the project's initiation, decision-making, and implementation phases [1][4]. - On September 8, 2023, the responsible leaders of Lushan County were criticized and ordered to write a self-reflection report, while the deputy county head in charge received a warning [1][4]. Group 2: Project Execution Problems - The project faced issues such as "build first, bid later," collusion in bidding, and inflated costs. A third-party engineering consulting firm recalculated the project cost to be 2,071,949.29 yuan [2][5]. - On August 29, 2023, the head of the Lushan County Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau was dismissed for negligence, and the deputy responsible for the bidding process was investigated and later expelled from the Party and public office [2][5]. Group 3: Legal Consequences - The involved company, Rui Art (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., faced a fine of 300,000 yuan, while its legal representative and actual controller received prison sentences with probation. The staff involved also received varying sentences and fines [2][5]. - The investigation highlighted the need for improved management and oversight to prevent similar issues in the future, with an apology issued for the delay in reporting the investigation results [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights recent public sightings of Jack Ma, emphasizing his continued presence and engagement in Hangzhou, particularly in relation to Alibaba and its entrepreneurial spirit [11][12]. Group 1: Recent Sightings and Public Engagement - On July 17, a video surfaced showing Jack Ma cycling by West Lake, where he greeted a fan and commented on the pleasant weather [1]. - Ma reminded the public to pay attention to safety while cycling, showcasing his approachable nature [4]. - The article mentions nostalgic memories shared by netizens about Ma's past, including his acts of bravery and his early days as a free tour guide around West Lake [5][4]. Group 2: Alibaba and Entrepreneurial Spirit - Jack Ma has made multiple appearances in Hangzhou since the end of 2024, including a visit to Alibaba's headquarters where he encouraged employees to maintain their entrepreneurial spirit [11]. - The "Lakeside Cabin," a replica of the original entrepreneurial space where Ma and his team started, was recently unveiled at Alibaba's global headquarters [11]. - During various events, Ma has emphasized the importance of technology serving humanity, particularly in the context of AI, indicating a focus on innovation and human-centric development [12].

Group 1 - The article discusses the investigation into Yang's alleged illegal activities while working in Yaan, including business dealings and violations related to childbirth [2][3][4] - Yang and three other public officials registered a company in 2015, which generated a total revenue of 829,800 yuan and a profit of 120,000 yuan during its operation [3] - The investigation revealed that Yang's family members do not hold public office and that Yang did not profit from disaster reconstruction projects during his tenure [8][9] Group 2 - The article also addresses the "expensive earrings" controversy, confirming that the earrings were a gift and were found to be glass, not valuable jewelry [6][8] - The investigation concluded that there were no other illegal activities associated with Yang during his time in Yaan [9] Group 3 - The article highlights the recent changes in JD's food delivery service, where the "20-minute free order" policy has been replaced with a compensation system [16][20] - This shift reflects a broader trend in the food delivery industry moving from subsidy wars to a focus on efficiency and customer experience [20]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the phenomenon of "trademark edge" marketing strategies in various industries, particularly in personal care and food sectors, raising concerns about consumer rights and fair competition [2][7]. Group 1: Trademark Issues - The "Pantene 3 Minute Miracle" conditioner has come under scrutiny for its trademark usage, with small print indicating that the trademark does not imply product efficacy [5]. - Similar marketing tactics are observed in other brands, such as "Tide All-in-1 360°" and "Crest 3D White," where the terms used are more about branding than actual product technology [3][5]. - The use of everyday terms as trademarks creates a misleading impression of product quality or effectiveness, leading to consumer confusion [5][6]. Group 2: Legal Perspectives - Legal experts note that the distinction between trademark edge and reasonable borrowing is often unclear and must be determined on a case-by-case basis [9][10]. - Misleading trademarks can harm consumer rights and disrupt fair market competition, as seen in various public controversies involving well-known brands [7][8]. - The legal framework surrounding deceptive trademarks is complex, with challenges in proving consumer harm and establishing causation between trademark use and consumer loss [11]. Group 3: Consumer Rights and Challenges - Consumers face significant difficulties in protecting their rights against misleading trademarks, often requiring legal action or complaints to regulatory bodies [10][11]. - The ambiguity in legal standards for trademark edge behavior complicates consumer claims, making it hard to demonstrate losses related to deceptive marketing [11]. - Brands that rely on misleading language rather than product quality risk losing consumer trust in the long run [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the risks associated with signing contracts with MCN (Multi-Channel Network) agencies for aspiring live streamers, particularly focusing on exorbitant penalty fees that can lead to significant financial burdens for the streamers [2][3][7]. Group 1: Recruitment and Contracts - Many MCN agencies are advertising high salaries to attract new streamers, but these offers often come with hidden traps in the contracts [2][8]. - A case study of a streamer named Chen Qi reveals that despite being promised a monthly income of 40,000 to 50,000 yuan, she earned only 200 yuan in 12 days of streaming, while being required to pay a penalty of 20,000 yuan for breaking the contract [9][10]. - Contracts often stipulate that the penalty for breach can be as high as eight times the total earnings of the streamer, creating a significant risk for those who do not meet performance expectations [7][15]. Group 2: Legal Issues and Penalties - Streamers have reported facing legal actions for high penalty fees, with one case involving a streamer being sued for 500,000 yuan due to a breach of contract after the platform ceased operations [21][26]. - The article discusses how some contracts include vague terms that can lead to severe penalties, such as requiring the streamer to pay back multiple times their earnings if they fail to meet certain conditions [12][17]. - Legal experts indicate that many MCN agencies employ unfair practices, including misleading promises and excessive penalties, particularly targeting inexperienced individuals like students [34][35]. Group 3: Recommendations for Streamers - Streamers are advised to thoroughly read contracts, paying close attention to fine print and hidden clauses that may impose unreasonable obligations or penalties [29][35]. - It is recommended that streamers seek written confirmation of any promises made by MCN agencies and maintain records of all communications related to their contracts [35]. - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the competitive nature of the industry and the potential for contracts to undermine a streamer's hard-earned reputation and financial stability [35].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the brand renewal of Hanlan, emphasizing its commitment to innovation and green development, aiming to enhance its brand influence and operational competitiveness in the environmental services industry [1][9][19]. Brand Renewal - Hanlan held a brand renewal event on July 15, 2025, in Foshan, introducing a new brand value system, including vision, proposition, spirit, and logo [1][2]. - The renewal is not just a visual update but a deep reflection on the company's 25-year development history, showcasing its growth through challenges and innovations [6][8]. Company Development - Since its entry into the A-share market in 2000, Hanlan has evolved from a local water supply company to a leading comprehensive environmental service provider, ranking among the top three in the country for waste incineration power generation [8]. - The company aims to leverage innovation as a driving force for development and to align economic benefits with social responsibilities [9]. Strategic Partnerships - Hanlan signed a strategic cooperation framework agreement with Guangdong Hengjian, focusing on high-quality development and collaboration in various sectors, including artificial intelligence and environmental services [18][19]. - The establishment of the "Artificial Intelligence Joint Research Institute" aims to position Hanlan as a leader in AI applications within the environmental sector, collaborating with top tech firms to enhance smart environmental governance [15][16]. Innovation and Technology - The new research institute will focus on developing AI models and applications tailored for ecological environment management, utilizing vast amounts of structured data from Hanlan's operations [16]. - The initiative aims to create a new intelligent system for the environmental industry, driving digital transformation and enhancing operational efficiency [16]. Commitment to Green Development - Hanlan's brand proposition, "Innovation makes green more accessible," reflects its dedication to sustainable practices and enhancing its brand impact [9][19]. - The company implemented a "green energy" initiative during the event, showcasing its commitment to low-carbon development by purchasing green electricity certificates equivalent to the event's energy consumption [19].