Core Insights - The retail sales of passenger cars in September reached 2.241 million units, a year-on-year increase of 6.3% and a month-on-month increase of 11.0%, indicating a strong growth trend before the end-of-year policy exit [4][8] - The cumulative retail sales for the year reached 17.005 million units, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 9.2%, with a notable increase from 1.2% in January-February to 11% in the first half of the year [4][8] - The market is transitioning towards a more stable operation with reduced price cuts and moderate promotions, as evidenced by 23 models having price reductions in September compared to 36 last year and 11 in 2023 [4][8] Passenger Car Market Analysis - The growth rate from July to September hovered around 6%, showing signs of deceleration due to high base effects, aligning with the earlier prediction of a "low-high-flat" trend for the year [4][8] - In September, the promotional intensity for new energy vehicles was maintained at a high level of 10.2%, an increase of 2.6 percentage points year-on-year, while traditional fuel vehicles saw a promotional intensity of 23.9% [4][8] - The penetration rate of new energy vehicles in domestic retail reached 57.8% in September, supported by policies such as tax exemptions and vehicle replacement incentives [13][17] Didi Autonomous Driving Financing - Didi Autonomous Driving completed a Series D financing round totaling 2 billion RMB, with funds primarily allocated for AI core algorithm development and the implementation of Level 4 autonomous driving applications [5][33] - This financing round brings Didi's total funding to approximately 10 billion RMB, with investments from various entities including SoftBank and GAC Group [5][33] - The CEO of Huawei's Intelligent Automotive Solutions BU announced a timeline for the commercialization of Level 3 and Level 4 autonomous driving, with expectations for significant advancements by 2027 [5][31] Investment Recommendations - The report suggests focusing on companies with strong positions in automotive intelligence and leading software capabilities, including Ruiming Technology, Daotong Technology, and others [5][37]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the company is "Accumulate" (maintained) [2] Core Views - The company reported a strong performance in the first three quarters of 2025, achieving operating revenue of 4.026 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 40.19%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 399 million yuan, up 13.13% year-on-year [9] - The liquid cooling business is poised for growth, driven by technological advancements and partnerships with major clients like NVIDIA and Intel [9] - The company is expected to benefit from the rapid growth in data center rack scale and new energy storage installations, with projected revenues of 6.401 billion yuan, 8.710 billion yuan, and 11.923 billion yuan for 2025, 2026, and 2027 respectively [9] Financial Performance Summary - **Revenue Forecast**: - 2023A: 3.529 billion yuan - 2024A: 4.589 billion yuan - 2025E: 6.401 billion yuan - 2026E: 8.710 billion yuan - 2027E: 11.923 billion yuan - **Net Profit Forecast**: - 2023A: 344 million yuan - 2024A: 453 million yuan - 2025E: 609 million yuan - 2026E: 820 million yuan - 2027E: 1.122 billion yuan - **EPS Forecast**: - 2023A: 0.47 yuan - 2024A: 0.61 yuan - 2025E: 0.62 yuan - 2026E: 0.84 yuan - 2027E: 1.15 yuan [8][10] Market Performance - The company's stock has shown a performance of -7% over the last 12 months compared to the Shanghai Composite Index and the CSI 300 Index [4]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided 2. Core Views - China has entered a low - interest era with high - volatility in the bond market. By referring to the US during the QE period (2008 - 2014) after the sub - prime crisis, the report finds that during the US interest rate rebound intervals, the market trades on the marginal improvement of the economic fundamentals, the implementation of fiscal stimulus bills, and the expectation of marginal tightening of monetary policy. In contrast, China's budget this year is relatively positive, but the fiscal strength still lags behind that of the overseas QE stage. The bond market may fluctuate, but there is no possibility of a systematic bear market. It is recommended to participate with a configuration mindset and seize high - interest points [1][2] 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 QE Aftermath: How Did US Treasury Bonds Perform? 3.1.1 US Four - Stage QE Policy (2008 - 2014) - After the sub - prime crisis, the Fed initiated the first round of quantitative easing through various means such as expanding long - term securities assets and creating new monetary policy tools. Subsequently, it restarted or adjusted the QE rhythm multiple times and used operations like "Operation Twist" to regulate economic recovery. The QE policy can be divided into six stages: QE1 (2008.11 - 2009.3), continued balance - sheet expansion (2009.3 - 2010.4), QE2 (2010.11 - 2011.6), two rounds of "Operation Twist" (2011.9 - 2012.9), QE3 and QE4 (2012.9 - 2013.12), and QE Taper (2014.1 - 2014.10). Through QE1, the Fed injected $1.725 trillion of liquidity into the market [6][9][10] 3.1.2 Post - QE US Treasury Bonds: Frequent Rebounds - After QE, US Treasury bond yields did not decline unilaterally but fluctuated frequently. A review of rebounds of over 30bp in the 10 - year Treasury bond yields usually shows that they are caused by factors such as significant fiscal policy expansion, the implementation of large - scale stimulus bills, exogenous shocks from risk events, marginal improvement in fundamentals, and marginal tightening of monetary policy. During the interest rate rebound intervals, speculative activities in the market often increase [18] 3.2 What Were the Sources of Fluctuations in US Treasury Bonds in the Low - Interest Era? 3.2.1 200812 - 200902: Rescue Plans Boosted Market Expectations and Fundamentals Improved Temporarily - After the Fed launched the first round of QE in November 2008, bond market yields dropped rapidly. Then, Bush's rescue plan for the auto industry, the issuance expectation of Treasury bonds, and profit - taking sentiment jointly drove the 10 - year Treasury bond yields to rebound. Additionally, improvements in the credit environment, inflation expectations, and key economic data such as employment and PMI also pushed up the yields [23][27] 3.2.2 200902: An Unconventional Stimulus Bill Was Enacted and Fundamentals Repaired Marginally - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 2.64% on February 17th to 3.02% on February 27th, an increase of 38bp. Obama's signing of the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" increased the expectation of Treasury bond issuance, and the repair of some fundamental data such as PPI, CPI, and real estate credit also pushed up the yields. However, the further downward revision of the Q4 2008 GDP growth terminated the yield rebound [28] 3.2.3 200903 - 200905: Policies to Stabilize Growth and Mitigate Risks Were Strengthened and Fundamentals Improved in Expectation - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 2.51% on March 18th to 3.29% on May 7th, an increase of 78bp. The Fed's intensified QE, the implementation of measures to dispose of non - performing financial assets, and financial regulatory reforms boosted market confidence. Improvements in fundamental indicators such as inflation, new housing starts, and manufacturing PMI supported the rise in inflation expectations. Overseas, the global QE wave and the issuance of IMF bonds also affected the US Treasury bond market [29][30][31] 3.2.4 200905 - 200906: Housing Protection and Stronger Regulations Were Upgraded and Fundamentals Hit Bottom and Rebounded - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 3.10% on May 14th to 3.98% on June 10th, an increase of 88bp. After the Fed's stress - test results were announced, the stock market took profit, and the bond market yields initially declined. Then, Obama's signing of the housing assistance bill and the strengthening of financial regulations boosted market confidence. Improvements in fundamental data such as inflation and per - capita disposable income pushed up long - term yields. Overseas, the intention of many countries to subscribe to IMF bonds squeezed the demand for US Treasury bonds [36][37] 3.2.5 200907: Record Deficit and Improving Fundamentals - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 3.32% on July 10th to 3.75% on July 27th, an increase of 43bp. The "Cash for Clunkers" program boosted auto consumption, and General Motors'资产重组 and government control stabilized market confidence. The record - high fiscal deficit increased bond supply and raised concerns about the US dollar, quickly pushing up bond market yields. The implementation of the financial regulatory reform bill and the rebound of multiple fundamental indicators also contributed to the yield increase [38][39][40] 3.2.6 200910: Economic Repair and Signals of Monetary Tightening, with Incremental Policies Added - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 3.21% on October 1st to 3.59% on October 26th, an increase of 38bp. The Fed signaled the start of economic repair and the gradual exit of monetary easing. The US government's innovation incentive strategy and positive signals from key economic data such as growth, inflation, and manufacturing drove up inflation expectations. Overseas, the global economic recovery and overseas interest - rate hikes reduced the demand for safe - haven assets [41][42][44] 3.2.7 200911 - 200912: Incremental Policies Continued to Be Strengthened and Fundamentals Trended Upward - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 3.21% on November 30th to 3.85% on December 31st, an increase of 64bp. Obama's signing of the assistance bill for workers, homeowners, and businesses and the plan to increase troops in Afghanistan increased fiscal expenditure pressure. Fundamental data such as GDP, PCE, and employment improved, raising inflation expectations. Overseas, Australia's interest - rate hike and the mitigation of the Dubai debt crisis also affected the US Treasury bond market [48][49] 3.2.8 201003 - 201004: Exit from QE, Implementation of Multiple Reforms, and Rapid Repair of Fundamentals - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 3.61% on March 4th to 4.01% on April 5th, an increase of 40bp. The approaching exit of the first round of QE, the acceleration of financial regulatory legislation, and the signing of the healthcare reform bill affected the market. Improvements in fundamental data such as employment, GDP, and PCE pushed up the yields [50][52] 3.2.9 201008 - 201009: Policies Signaled Economic Stabilization and Fundamentals Stabilized - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 2.47% on August 31st to 2.81% on September 10th, an increase of 34bp. The Fed and the US government released signals to stabilize the economy, boosting market expectations. Some fundamental data such as GDP and unemployment claims showed positive signs, and the stock index and crude oil prices temporarily stopped falling and rebounded. However, the Fed's褐皮书 indicated a slowdown in economic growth, and the yields returned to a downward - trending oscillation [55][56][61] 3.2.10 201011 - 201012: QE2 + Tax - Cut and Employment Bills, with Improved Fundamentals - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 2.53% on November 4th to 3.53% on December 15th, an increase of 100bp. The Fed's restart of QE and the release of signals for broad fiscal policies increased the expectation of Treasury bond issuance. Improvements in fundamental data such as employment, PPI, CPI, and GDP raised inflation expectations [63][64] 3.2.11 201012 - 201102: Firm Commitment to QE and Strong Fundamentals - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 3.30% on December 31st to 3.70% on February 10th, an increase of 40bp. The Fed's reaffirmation of the QE policy stabilized market confidence and drove up inflation expectations. The improvement of data in areas such as prices, production, and consumption continued. Overseas, the issuance of European bonds alleviated market panic [65][66] 3.2.12 201103 - 201104: Intensified Expectation of Tightening and Improved Fundamentals - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 3.22% on March 16th to 3.59% on April 11th, an increase of 37bp. Inflation indicators and fundamental data such as employment and retail sales improved. Statements from Fed officials, the sale of mortgage - backed securities, and Bill Gross's short - selling of US Treasury bonds increased the upward pressure on yields. The US debt - ceiling issue also worried the market. Overseas, factors such as the Japanese nuclear leak, China's policy shift, the Middle - East situation, and the ECB's interest - rate hike affected the US Treasury bond market [67][68][70] 3.2.13 201109 - 201110: Implementation of OT Operation, Boosted Policy Expectations, and Improved Fundamentals - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 1.72% on September 22nd to 2.26% on October 14th, an increase of 54bp. The implementation of the "Operation Twist" and the disappointment of QE3 expectations led to a rise in yields. The operation was questioned, and it was seen as paving the way for QE3, raising economic expectations. Fundamental indicators such as GDP, PCE, and employment improved significantly. Overseas, the global interest - rate cut wave increased the expectation of QE in the US [72][73][79] 3.2.14 201202 - 201203: Economic Repair and Rising Expectation of Monetary Tightening - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 1.98% on February 29th to 2.39% on March 19th, an increase of 41bp. The Fed's indication of a mild economic recovery and the results of the bank stress - test boosted market confidence. Improvements in fundamental data such as economic activity, inflation, and employment increased risk appetite [80][81][82] 3.2.15 201207 - 201208: Prominent Structural Economic Problems and the Fed's Strengthened Expectation of QE - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 1.43% on July 25th to 1.83% on August 16th, an increase of 40bp. The economy showed structural problems in growth, employment, manufacturing, consumption, and real estate. The Fed's statements strengthened the expectation of QE, increasing market risk appetite. Overseas, new developments in the European debt crisis and the global interest - rate cut wave affected the US Treasury bond market [83][84][85] 3.2.16 201208 - 201209: Declining Fundamentals and Rising Expectation of QE3 - The 10 - year Treasury bond yields rose from 1.57% on August 31st to 1.88% on September 14th, an increase of 31bp. Bernanke's speech hinted at QE, boosting market expectations. Declining inflation and poor employment performance supported the expectation of QE3. The Fed officially launched the third round of QE on September 13th, ending the yield rebound [86][87][88]

Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided regarding the report industry investment rating. Core Viewpoints - With the decline of the interest rate center, China's money market fund (MMF) yields have entered the "1%" era. Given the current weak fundamentals, MMF yields may continue to adjust, and a full "break below 1%" is just a matter of time. However, MMFs are important liquidity management tools for both households and institutions. The expansion space of China's MMFs remains large [2][3][4]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. MMF Yields Breaking Below 1% is Inevitable in a Low-Interest Rate Environment - MMF yields have been continuously declining and entered the 1% range this year. In September 2025, the monthly average yield of MMFs was about 1.15%, a decrease of 0.17bp compared to June. The 25% quantile of the 7-day annualized yield of MMFs also dropped to 1.04%. All MMF yields have been below 2% since this year, and the yield range with the highest proportion of MMF numbers has shifted left for two consecutive quarters, reaching 1.0% - 1.2% at the end of the second quarter [9]. - Deposits, certificates of deposit (CDs), and funds lending are the basic allocation of MMFs, driving the continuous decline of MMF yields. In the second quarter of 2025, the allocation proportion of MMFs to interbank certificates of deposit, bank deposits, and repurchase agreements reached 91.6%. Against the backdrop of the central bank's continuous loose monetary policy, the decline of the broad - spectrum interest rate center has led to a synchronous decline in MMF yields [11]. - Considering the need to support the fundamentals, cooperate with fiscal policies, and resolve bank risks, the broad - spectrum interest rate is likely to continue to decline, and it is only a matter of time before MMF yields "break below 1%" on a large scale [15]. 2. MMFs are Important Liquidity Management Tools for Households and Institutions 2.1 Household Sector: Deposit Outflow and the Re - balance between "Yield and Liquidity" - The phenomenon of financial disintermediation may deepen under low - interest rates, and MMFs are one of the main channels for household deposit transfer. In Japan's low - interest - rate era, household time deposits were largely converted into demand deposits, and deposits remained within the bank balance sheet. In China, there has been an acceleration of financial disintermediation, with household deposits flowing out of the balance sheet and into fixed - income - like product investments. From July to August this year, non - bank deposits increased significantly while household deposits increased less, mainly due to the rising preference for wealth management and other investments among households [17][18]. - Households' preference for liquidity and stable returns will also benefit MMFs. After the epidemic, households first valued stable returns. From 2024, their preference gradually shifted to "balancing yield and liquidity". Compared with wealth management products, MMFs have the advantage of the amortized cost method, with less volatility, smoother returns, and more flexible and diverse promotion channels [25][26]. 2.2 Institutional Sector: Cash Management Tools for Institutional Investors - For institutional investors, MMFs have high flexibility and resilience in a low - interest - rate environment. In the short term, MMF yields may face some pressure. In the long run, if the funds rate continues to decline, the flexibility advantage of MMFs in underlying asset allocation will be evident [34]. - Compared with short - term bond funds, MMFs have more prominent advantages. Short - term bond funds face the dual pressures of low interest rates and high volatility. The implementation of the new fund sales regulations will also impact short - term bond funds, and the cost advantage of MMFs will be more obvious, leading to a potential diversion of funds from short - term bond funds to MMFs [35]. 3. MMFs Will Not Disappear in China 3.1 How are MMFs in Overseas Markets? - Different economies have different development paths for MMFs in a low - interest - rate environment. Japan's MMFs have almost disappeared because of extremely low interest rates and the freedom for funds to go overseas. In the US and Europe, MMFs show strong resilience. In the US, MMFs are still important cash management tools, with a relatively strong economic base, strong ability to absorb global funds, and more diversified product types. In the eurozone, MMF yields were higher than the funds rate during the negative - interest - rate period [41][42]. 3.2 What are the Differences in China's MMFs? - China's MMFs may develop more like those in the US and still have development potential and space in the medium and long term. Under the central bank's "interest rate corridor + macro - prudential" adjustment model, China's short - term interest rates are unlikely to fall into the extreme negative range like in Europe and Japan. The asymmetry in the "convenience of funds going overseas" also means that due to relatively strict capital account management in China, the demand for liquidity management remains, and MMFs still have value. The resonance of channels and regulatory orientation makes MMFs beneficiaries of policies. The deep binding of online payment scenarios and the construction of an ecological closed - loop by platforms have significantly enhanced the competitive advantage of MMFs [48][49].

Export Performance - In September, China's export year-on-year growth rate recorded 8.3%, an increase of 3.9 percentage points from the previous month, but the two-year average growth rate has declined[4] - Exports to emerging markets such as Latin America and Africa improved significantly, while direct exports to the U.S. rebounded[4] - Consumer electronics and general machinery saw notable increases in export volumes[4] Import Performance - China's import year-on-year growth rate in September was 7.4%, up 6.1 percentage points from August, significantly higher than the average of the past five years[12] - The increase in imports was primarily driven by rising demand for production raw materials and energy, with notable recovery in imports from resource countries and the EU[12] - Among major trading partners, imports from the EU rose by 9.5%, while imports from the U.S. decreased by 16.1%[12] Trade Balance - The trade surplus in September was $90.45 billion, a slight contraction from the previous month, but net exports continue to support the economy[16] - The outlook for exports in the fourth quarter is stable but expected to decline slightly due to elevated export bases and a weakening U.S. economy[16] Sector Insights - Significant improvements were noted in mobile phones and general machinery exports, with mobile phone exports increasing by over 15 percentage points year-on-year[9] - In the transportation sector, shipbuilding saw a growth rate of 43%, while automotive exports declined by 10.8%[9] Risks - Risks include potential underperformance of domestic economic recovery, unexpected declines in demand from developed countries, and changes in import-export policies[18][20]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the company is "Buy" (maintained) [2] Core Insights - The company reported a significant revenue and profit increase in Q3 2025, with revenue reaching 4.197 billion yuan, a year-on-year growth of 27.5%, and adjusted profit of 444 million yuan, up 4.8% year-on-year [7] - The HNB (Heat Not Burn) segment is expected to become a major growth driver, with substantial sales growth anticipated in Japan and Europe [7] - The ODM+ strategy has shown satisfactory growth due to successful product iterations, with overall growth expected to exceed double digits [7] - The valuation of the company is expected to rise with the introduction of new compliant products and the recent FDA acceptance of a generic drug application for Breo® Ellipta® [7] - The company forecasts revenues of 14.2 billion, 16.9 billion, and 19.5 billion yuan for 2025, 2026, and 2027 respectively, with corresponding net profits of 1.395 billion, 1.898 billion, and 2.368 billion yuan [7] Financial Performance Summary - Revenue projections for the company are as follows: 11,168 million yuan in 2023, 11,799 million yuan in 2024, 14,200 million yuan in 2025, 16,900 million yuan in 2026, and 19,500 million yuan in 2027, with a revenue growth rate of 20.35% in 2025 [6][8] - The net profit forecast shows a decline in 2024 to 1,303 million yuan, followed by a recovery to 1,395 million yuan in 2025, and further growth to 1,898 million yuan in 2026 and 2,368 million yuan in 2027 [6][8] - The company's EPS is projected to be 0.23 yuan in 2025, 0.31 yuan in 2026, and 0.38 yuan in 2027, with corresponding PE ratios of 64.53x, 47.44x, and 38.02x [6][8]

Core Insights - The report maintains a positive outlook on the light manufacturing industry, emphasizing the potential for recovery and growth in various segments [1][4]. Group 1: Industry Performance - The overall export value for furniture, entertainment products, paper, and packaging printing from January to August was 898.9 billion, 2132.4 billion, 524.5 billion, and 401.2 billion respectively, with year-on-year changes of -7.9%, -1.2%, +2.2%, and -1.4% [6]. - Domestic industry performance from January to August showed a year-on-year increase in value added for furniture at -5.1%, entertainment products at +0.9%, paper at +3.2%, and packaging printing at +1.3% [6]. Group 2: Market Trends - The report highlights that the information technology sector is enhancing global production efficiency, leading to ongoing supply innovation and product upgrades [6]. - The report suggests that the pet and personal care sectors are still in a favorable economic cycle, while the furniture sector is in a bottoming process [6]. Group 3: Investment Recommendations - The report recommends focusing on companies related to pets, personal care, and the export chain, as these areas are expected to benefit from ongoing trends in supply chain innovation and product upgrades [6]. - Specific companies are highlighted with projected revenues and profit margins for Q3 2025, indicating a range of expected growth rates [7].

Core Insights - The report maintains a positive outlook on the building materials sector, highlighting a divergence in performance among companies, with demand being a central theme [2][4] - The report emphasizes that the construction materials industry is experiencing a mixed performance, with some companies benefiting from improved competitive dynamics while others face challenges due to demand and pricing pressures [7][10] Group 1: Consumer Building Materials - The consumer building materials segment shows a divergence in performance, with companies like Sanhe Tree and Oriental Yuhong expected to achieve significant growth due to improved competition and reduced pricing pressures [10][11] - The revenue for Q3 is anticipated to remain flat or decline for most building materials companies, but some may see slight year-on-year increases due to favorable competitive conditions [10][11] - Cost factors such as stable or declining prices for key materials like asphalt and PVC positively impact margins for waterproofing and coating companies [10][11] Group 2: Cement Industry - The cement industry faces weak demand from both real estate and infrastructure sectors, with production volumes declining by 5.6% and 6.2% year-on-year in July and August respectively [12][13] - The average price of cement in Q3 2025 was 343.86 RMB/ton, reflecting a decrease of 8.74% quarter-on-quarter and 10.55% year-on-year, indicating significant pricing pressure [12][13] - The report notes that the industry is currently at a low profitability level due to high inventory and rising production costs driven by coal prices [13] Group 3: Glass Industry - The glass industry is experiencing downward pressure on prices and profitability due to declining demand from the real estate sector, with the average price in Q3 2025 at 68.25 RMB/weight box, down 4.42% quarter-on-quarter [19] - High inventory levels persist in the glass sector, with 5,329 million weight boxes reported by the end of September, exacerbating the pricing challenges [19][20] - The report indicates that while raw material costs have decreased, the overall impact on profitability remains negative due to significant price declines [19] Group 4: Glass Fiber Industry - The glass fiber industry is characterized by structural demand differentiation, with high-end products performing better than low-end offerings, leading to a mixed profitability landscape [21] - The average price for non-alkali glass fiber yarn in Q3 2025 was 4,270 RMB/ton, reflecting a year-on-year decline of 44 RMB/ton, indicating pricing challenges [21] - The report highlights that the industry is facing high inventory levels, with 860,000 tons reported by the end of September, contributing to ongoing profitability pressures [21] Group 5: Company Performance Forecast - The report provides a forecast for various companies in the building materials sector, with Oriental Yuhong expected to achieve a net profit of 374-442 million RMB in Q3 2025, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 12%-32% [26] - Sanhe Tree is projected to see a significant increase in net profit, with estimates ranging from 329-366 million RMB, indicating a growth of 64%-83% year-on-year [26] - Other companies like Huaxin Cement and Conch Cement are also highlighted for their potential profitability improvements, with net profit forecasts indicating positive growth trends [26]

Core Insights - The report indicates a downward trend in pig prices due to increased supply and policy guidance, leading to accelerated capacity reduction in the industry [1][7][18] - The overall agricultural sector has shown a positive performance with a 1.18% increase week-on-week, while the pig farming segment is experiencing significant losses [11][36] Pig Farming Data Tracking - The number of breeding sows has slightly decreased, with a 0.33% month-on-month decline in September [19] - Pig prices have dropped significantly, with the average price on October 9 being 11.89 CNY/kg, reflecting a week-on-week decrease of 6.16% [28][29] - The profitability of pig farming remains negative, with losses of 152.15 CNY per head for self-bred pigs and 301.04 CNY per head for purchased piglets as of October 10 [36] Poultry Farming Data Tracking - The poultry sector is facing challenges due to outbreaks of avian influenza, but there are investment opportunities in the white-feathered chicken market [37] - The average price for white-feathered meat chickens was 6.88 CNY/kg on October 10, with a slight week-on-week decrease of 0.15% [40] Animal Health Data Tracking - The demand for animal health products is expected to rebound, driven by an increase in livestock numbers and new product launches [47] - Significant growth in vaccine approvals has been noted, with various companies making advancements in vaccine development [47] Seed Industry Data Tracking - The prices of key agricultural commodities such as wheat and soybean meal have increased, indicating a positive trend in the seed industry [50] - The report emphasizes the importance of strengthening food security and promoting the commercialization of biological breeding [50] Pet Industry Data Tracking - Pet food exports have decreased by 15.5% year-on-year, amounting to 834 million CNY in August 2025 [56] - Domestic sales of pet food are growing rapidly, with a combined growth rate of 3% across major e-commerce platforms in September [57]

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - The rebound of 10-year Treasury bond futures has begun since September 25, and it's advisable to participate in the rebound on dips. T2512 may rise above the September 17 high of 108.165 on Monday. If so, it's considered the fourth wave of the decline since May, and one can consider participating in the rebound on dips. First, pay attention to the resistance around the low of the first wave at 108.41. If this level is broken, from a quarterly line perspective, focus on the resistance around 108.93. There may still be adjustments after the rebound ends [2][10]. - Treasury bond futures rose overall this week, except for TS which declined. The trading activity of Treasury bond futures decreased overall. The average daily trading volume of the 2512 contracts of each maturity decreased compared with last week, except for TS2512 which increased. The volume/position ratio decreased for all maturities except for TS2512 which rebounded. The CTD net basis of the 2512 contracts increased across the board, and the IRR decreased overall. Currently, the IRR is around 1.3%-1.4%, still relatively low compared with the funding rate, so the value of participating in the cash-and-carry strategy is limited, and it's better to wait for a better opportunity [3]. Group 3: Summary Based on Related Catalogs 1. Weekly Technical Analysis 1.1 Pre - trend Review - T2512 closed with a negative line in the third quarter and a doji in September. Since September 25, it has continued to rebound, and the level of the rebound may expand. On October 10, the rebound hit resistance at the 60 - day line, but the spot bonds performed well on Saturday. If there is no significant fluctuation before the market opens on Monday, T2512 may rise further, and the lowest price on September 25 may become a phased low [7]. 1.2 Future Market Outlook - Due to the significant decline in the spot Treasury bond yield on Saturday, T2512 may rise above the September 17 high of 108.165 on Monday, completely retracing the previous decline. The previous adjustment may have ended on September 25, and it's currently the fourth wave of the decline since May. One can consider participating in the rebound on dips. If it rises above 108.165 on Monday, the period from July 7 to September 25 is considered the third wave of the decline since early May, which extended and had nine sub - waves, with the fifth wave being an ending diagonal triangle. First, pay attention to the resistance around 108.41, and if broken, focus on the resistance around 108.93 from a quarterly line perspective. There may still be adjustments after the rebound ends [10]. 2. Weekly Tracking of Treasury Bond Futures - After the holiday, Treasury bond futures rose overall. As of the close on October 10, the closing prices of the 2512 contracts of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year Treasury bond futures were 102.354, 105.650, 107.980, and 113.97 yuan respectively, with changes of - 0.018, + 0.020, + 0.135, and + 0.07 yuan compared with before the holiday [15]. - The trading activity of Treasury bond futures decreased overall this week. The average daily trading volume of the 2512 contracts of each maturity decreased compared with last week, except for TS2512 which increased. The volume/position ratio decreased for all maturities except for TS2512 which rebounded [3][15]. - As of October 10, the positions of the 2512 contracts of Treasury bond futures were divided, with TS and TF decreasing and T and TL increasing [15]. - As of October 10, the CTD net basis of the 2512 contracts of each maturity increased across the board, with the CTD net basis of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year 2512 contracts being + 0.01, 0.00, + 0.02, and + 0.01 yuan respectively [20]. - In terms of IRR, the IRR corresponding to the CTD of the 2512 contracts of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year Treasury bond futures were 1.37%, 1.42%, 1.33%, and 1.41% respectively, all of which decreased. Currently, the IRR level is not high compared with the funding rate, so the value of participating in the cash-and-carry strategy is limited, and it's better to wait for a better opportunity [20]. - The spread between the 2512 - 2603 contracts was divided this week, with the spreads of 5 - year and 10 - year decreasing, and the spreads of 2 - year and 30 - year showing no obvious change [20].