证券研究报告|宏观点评报告 [Table_Date] 2025 年 06 月 18 日 存单的波动依然不大。1-19 日累计发行规模达到 2.5 万亿元之上，基本追平今年前五个月 2.8 万亿元的月 均值，与本月 4.2 万亿元的到期规模仅剩 1.7 万亿元左右的缺口。据 19 日的发行计划，1 个月国股行存单定价 在 1.60-1.62%，9 个月至 1 年期国股行品种定价在 1.63-1.65%，未体现出提价压力，季末银行负债端较为乐 观。 [Table_Title] 资产配置日报：涨势依旧 现券交易主线继续围绕央行动态。早间陆家嘴会议开幕式上，央行宣布八项重磅金融政策，内容涉及面较 广，其中与债市关联性较高的政策是设立银行间市场交易报告库，高频汇集并系统分析银行间债券等金融子市场 交易数据。类似操作在 2024 年已有预演，因此，政策出炉并未对市场定价产生过多影响。不过，市场满怀期待 的"央行重启买债"及"国债缴准"并未在会议上被提及，这也使得债市行情略有减速，各期限国债活跃品种多 小幅上行，利差保护较足的老券、政金债、地方债品种收益率反而延续了下行趋势。 | | | 复盘与思考: 6 月 18 日，股 ...

Group 1 - Nassim Taleb suggests that while the dollar remains an effective medium of exchange, gold has effectively become the world's reserve currency [1][2] - Taleb highlights that the market is driven by asset allocation rather than long-term economic factors, indicating a disconnect between market behavior and economic fundamentals [2][3] - The accumulation of gold reserves by central banks is seen as a sign of the dollar losing its status as a reserve currency, with recent geopolitical events accelerating this trend [2][3] Group 2 - Taleb criticizes the economic strategies of the Trump administration, arguing that their approach is irrational and detrimental to GDP growth [3][4] - He points out that tariffs imposed on goods not produced domestically disproportionately affect the lower-income population, as they spend a larger portion of their income on necessities [4] - The potential impact of immigration policies on the labor market is discussed, with Taleb warning that restricting labor sources could have negative long-term consequences for the economy [4]

固收 市场的共识与潜在预期差 华泰研究 证券研究报告 2025 年 6 月 18 日│中国内地 资产配置周报 核心观点 近期影响资产的宏观主线发生切换，市场对关税的敏感度在下降，对经济数 据、地缘局势的关注度在提升，而前期形成的市场共识也开始出现分歧与预 期差。地缘冲突对资产价格多为短期的脉冲式影响，而关税、财政政策落地 后的基本面状态，成为影响大类资产价格走势的中长期变量。不确定性环境 下，重申"重赔率+重左侧+重交易"的配置策略，尤其关注一致预期出现 反转后的交易机会。本周配置建议方面，当前市场处于关税政策的疲劳期+ 基本面数据验证期+地缘扰动频发期，在基本面降温以及地缘避险需求下， 前期计入较多关税乐观预期的权益资产赔率或欠佳，而债券、黄金等避险资 产胜率相对更高，仍需关注中东地缘局势、陆家嘴论坛等。 核心主题：市场的共识与潜在预期差 我们尝试梳理了五组市场共识与潜在预期差，以供投资者参考，并建议把握 共识反转后的交易机会。1）关税对市场影响力度降低，逐渐退化为扰动性 因素。关税对美国基本面影响可能偏滞后，但不会缺席。2）美国债务问题 恶化，美债利率易上难下，美元或长期走弱。但长期债务问题已定价较为充 ...

Summary of Key Points from Conference Call Records Industry Overview - The conference focused on the **U.S. public fund market**, which has surpassed **$30 trillion** in total assets as of the first quarter of 2025. The market share of passive management funds exceeded that of active management funds for the first time in early 2024, reaching **53%** by April 2025. The total size of ETF products reached **$10 trillion**, growing nearly **50 times** over the past 20 years [1][8]. Core Insights and Arguments - The **fee structure** in the U.S. public fund market has significantly decreased due to the rise of passive strategies. From 2004 to 2024, the asset-weighted average fee dropped from **0.72% to 0.34%**, a reduction of over **50%**. Active management funds have an average fee of **0.59%**, while passive funds have a much lower fee of **0.11%** [1][10]. - Active management strategies are attempting to adapt to the passive wave through innovations such as index optimization and active ETFs. However, they face challenges in consistently outperforming passive funds, with a win rate of only **42%** for active funds compared to passive funds in 2024 [1][15]. - The **alpha levels** of small active management funds have significantly declined since before 2006, while large funds have maintained stable alpha levels. It is projected that the market share of active management funds will decrease to **17%** over the next 15 years, reaching a state of equilibrium [1][17]. Additional Important Insights - The **innovation direction** in the U.S. public fund industry includes the automation of index design, active ETFs, and new product and service models aimed at personalized asset allocation, which is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of around **10%** over the next decade [3][25]. - The **impact of AI and quantitative investment** is notable in reducing service costs and enhancing professionalism in financial services. These technologies help meet client needs more effectively and improve overall service quality [3][33]. - The **performance of different asset classes** shows that passive strategies dominate in equity funds, while active strategies still have room to operate in bond funds and certain international contexts [9]. - The **Smart Beta strategy** has an average fee of **0.16%**, with the lowest fees found in passive strategies, indicating a competitive landscape driven by investor preference for low-fee products [12][13]. - The **current trends in fintech** indicate a diversification and innovation in investment strategies, with a focus on core industries like banking expected to perform well in the next three years [2][7]. This summary encapsulates the key points discussed in the conference call, highlighting the significant trends and insights within the U.S. public fund market and the broader financial services landscape.

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding investment psychology, setting realistic expectations, and maintaining a disciplined investment strategy to achieve long-term financial growth [3][7][21]. Group 1: Understanding Investment Psychology - Investors often face cognitive gaps and emotional challenges that lead to poor decision-making in financial markets [5][12]. - Acknowledging one's limitations and adopting a humble approach to investing is crucial for long-term success [6][7]. Group 2: Setting Realistic Expectations - Long-term returns for various asset classes are outlined, with equities expected to yield 8%-10% annually, while bonds may provide 3%-5% [8]. - A diversified investment strategy can aim for a combined return of 6%-8%, with potential for 8%-12% through passive strategies like index investing [8][19]. Group 3: Risk Management and Asset Allocation - Understanding potential drawdowns is essential, with equities possibly experiencing declines of 70%-80%, while bonds may see 5% and commodities up to 30% [10]. - A diversified portfolio should consider asset classes, market distribution, and time allocation to mitigate risks and enhance returns [15][16][19]. Group 4: Strategy Implementation and Consistency - The article introduces the "雪球三分法" (Snowball Three-Factor Method) for long-term investment, focusing on asset, market, and time diversification [26]. - Consistency in following a well-defined investment strategy is critical, as emotional reactions to market fluctuations can derail long-term plans [21][23].

【有料有益】——深度干货分享 盛夏将至，风起南海，市场波动暗藏玄机。当风舞千枝，谁能掌稳舟楫，洞察方向？一场属于专业投 顾的夏日避险聚会，即将在深圳悄然启航—— 在情绪剧烈起伏、信号模糊交织的周期中，债券ETF正重新成为资产配置中的"定盘星"。本次沙龙以" 风舞千枝动，债隐一舟通 "为主题，聚焦当下宏观环境与资产波动，围绕债券ETF的避险功能与策略 创新，为一线投资顾问带来思维重构与实战启发。 沙龙主题：风舞千枝动，债隐一舟通 沙龙时间：2025年6月21日13:30-16:00 沙龙地址：深圳大中华希尔顿酒店（启航6） 本次沙龙我们荣幸地邀请到 深圳证券交易所基金部高级经理 赵欢欢 ，带来" 深交所ETF市场及重点 产品介绍 "的主题分享。同时，我们还特别邀请 博时基金固收二部基金经理 张朱霖 ，与大家探讨" 从工具到策略：解码债券ETF在资产配置中的攻守平衡术 "；在圆桌对话环节， 博时基金ETF业务发 展总监 王鹤锟 将与四位深圳优秀投顾共同展开关于" 下半年投资机会与ETF展业实践 "的深度交流与 观点碰撞。 【有趣有礼】——丰富礼品等你拿 在沙龙过程中，我们将设置充满趣味的打卡活动，现场还将提供精美 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article introduces the "Xueqiu Three-Point Method," which enhances traditional asset allocation by incorporating global asset allocation and dynamic rebalancing strategies [2][42]. Group 1: Asset Allocation - The "Three-Point" method consists of asset diversification across stocks, bonds, and commodities [3][42]. - It emphasizes market diversification by investing in different regions such as A-shares, Hong Kong stocks, and US stocks [3][42]. - The method also includes timing diversification through regular investment (dollar-cost averaging) [3][42]. Group 2: User Experience - The tool is designed to be user-friendly, allowing investors with limited knowledge to create a portfolio that outperforms benchmarks [4][5]. - Users can manually adjust asset allocation based on their preferences after an initial questionnaire [9][11]. - The platform offers a curated selection of high-quality funds, simplifying the selection process for users [12][25]. Group 3: Fund Selection Process - Users can choose from a pool of recommended funds or opt for a pre-assembled portfolio [12][13]. - The platform provides detailed information and tags for each fund, making it easier for users to understand their investment options [24][25]. - The tool allows for the selection of various fund types, including index funds and overseas investments [16][18]. Group 4: Rebalancing and Performance Tracking - The "Three-Point Dashboard" provides weekly updates on asset valuations and market sentiment, aiding in rebalancing decisions [30][39]. - The dashboard tracks multiple key indicators to inform users about market conditions and potential adjustments [41][42]. - The article highlights a successful reallocation based on the dashboard's recommendations, demonstrating its effectiveness [32][37].

Core Viewpoint - The potential for a depreciation of the US dollar is increasing due to misalignment in monetary policy and obstacles in the dollar's external circulation, suggesting a focus on foreign exchange markets, commodities, and non-US equity investment opportunities [1]. Group 1: Historical Context of Dollar Depreciation - Since 1970, there have been seven significant periods of dollar depreciation, each impacting asset performance differently, with commodities generally benefiting the most [2]. - Key periods include: 1. 1971-1973: Breakdown of the Bretton Woods system led to a dollar credit crisis, benefiting commodities and Asian equities [2]. 2. 1976-1980: Missteps by the Federal Reserve resulted in high inflation, with commodities performing best amid concerns of stagflation [2]. 3. 1985-1987: The Plaza Accord initiated a deliberate dollar depreciation, with industrial metals outperforming precious metals and Japanese equities leading globally [2]. 4. 1989-1992: US economic recession and German reunification led to a weaker dollar, with subdued performance in commodities and equities [2]. 5. 1994-1995: Unexpected rate hikes by the Federal Reserve suppressed economic expectations, benefiting commodities as non-US economies rebounded [2]. 6. 2002-2008: The US faced "twin deficits," leading to a commodities bull market and strong performance in non-US equities [2]. 7. 2017-2018: Recovery in the Eurozone and emerging markets resulted in positive returns for both commodities and equities [2]. Group 2: Drivers of Dollar Weakness - Factors contributing to dollar weakness include relative economic advantages, misaligned monetary policies, and credit risks associated with the dollar [3]. - Economic advantages typically arise during global economic recoveries, prompting capital to flow from the US to faster-growing regions [3]. - Misalignment in monetary policy has historically led to dollar weakness, though such periods are rare [3]. - Credit risks emerge when global investors grow concerned about the dollar's stability, leading to a sell-off and subsequent depreciation [3]. Group 3: Asset Performance During Dollar Weakness - Commodities consistently outperform during periods of dollar weakness, driven by demand for physical assets and reduced investment costs for developed countries [4]. - Non-US equity markets tend to benefit more than US equities, with emerging markets showing greater elasticity in capital inflows [4]. - Historical performance rankings during dollar depreciation periods show that the Hang Seng Index outperformed, followed by the Nikkei 225 and European markets [4]. Group 4: Investment Opportunities - The likelihood of a trend towards dollar depreciation is increasing, with a focus on foreign exchange markets, commodities, and non-US equity investments [5]. - Key investment areas include: 1. Foreign exchange: The Eurozone, Japan, and Canada are expected to see their currencies strengthen due to high net positions in US assets [5]. 2. Commodities: Continued value in gold and potential for other physical assets to gain traction [5]. 3. Equities: Focus on economies with leverage capacity, such as Germany and India, with Hong Kong stocks expected to outperform A-shares due to improved liquidity [5].

Core Insights - The active equity funds have shown a dramatic contrast in performance amidst rising capital market volatility, with the first "doubling fund" emerging in the year, igniting market enthusiasm, while new fund issuance remains relatively subdued [1][3] - As of June 13, the "Huitianfu Hong Kong Advantage Selected Mixed A/C" fund achieved a year-to-date return exceeding 100%, becoming a market highlight, while 16 active equity funds have returns over 70% [3][4] - Despite strong performance from some funds, the new issuance of active equity funds has been lackluster, with a total of 299.16 billion yuan raised in new funds this year, accounting for only 6.56% of the total public offering new issuance [5][6] Fund Performance - The first "doubling fund" appeared in the active equity market, with the "Huitianfu Hong Kong Advantage Selected Mixed" fund showing a year-to-date increase of over 100% [3] - Other notable funds include "Changcheng Medical Industry Selected Mixed" with over 87% return and "Yongying Medical Innovation Smart Selection" with over 79% return [3] - The overall average return for active equity funds this year is 2.87%, with a significant disparity of 132.35 percentage points between the best and worst performers [3][4] Fund Issuance - A total of 89 new active equity funds were established this year, with the largest fund being "Oriental Red Core Value Mixed" at 19.91 billion yuan [5][6] - 32 active equity funds had issuance sizes below 1 billion yuan, indicating a trend towards smaller fund launches [5] - The failure of the "Shenwan Lingshin Vision Growth Mixed" fund to meet fundraising conditions highlights challenges in the current market environment [6] Market Outlook - Analysts suggest that the key to breaking the current stagnation in new fund issuance lies in enhancing asset allocation capabilities and improving net value performance [7][8] - The recent reforms in public funds emphasize the alignment of fund company income with investor returns, which may enhance the attractiveness of existing products and instill confidence in new offerings [8] - Future issuance of active equity funds may improve as market conditions stabilize and investor confidence returns, with a focus on optimizing product design and enhancing service quality [8][9]

Group 1 - The article introduces the "Xiaoxue Three-Part Method" investment strategy, which aims to provide a more scientific and sustainable investment approach to avoid losses from chasing market trends [3][4]. - The investment allocation is based on a growth-oriented plan with a ratio of 30% bonds, 60% stocks, and 10% commodities, reflecting the author's risk tolerance and investment goals [3][4]. - The bond allocation focuses on domestic bonds and U.S. dollar bonds to benefit from high yields and potential interest rate cuts, serving as a stabilizing component in the portfolio [3][4]. Group 2 - The performance of the Xiaoxue Three-Part Method portfolio showed an overall increase of 0.76% last week, with contributions from both equity and bond segments despite a turbulent domestic equity market [7]. - The article highlights the resilience of the portfolio amid geopolitical tensions, with gold prices rising by 1.56% and oil prices surging by 13.32% due to market dynamics [7][18]. - The article notes that the portfolio's year-to-date weighted return is 4.88%, with a maximum drawdown of less than 8%, indicating a balanced growth strategy [7]. Group 3 - The A-share market experienced a pullback, with major indices declining, while sectors like energy and materials showed positive performance [9][10]. - The Hong Kong market displayed mixed results, with healthcare and materials sectors performing well, while consumer sectors faced declines [12]. - U.S. stock indices faced pressure, with the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones all recording losses due to rising inflation expectations and geopolitical tensions [14]. Group 4 - The bond market showed a slight upward trend, supported by central bank signals and increased buying activity in short-term bonds [15][17]. - The article emphasizes the importance of commodity investments as a risk-hedging tool, with a recommended allocation of 10-15% to enhance portfolio performance [4][21]. - Geopolitical events have significantly impacted commodity prices, with oil prices rebounding sharply due to Middle Eastern tensions and gold prices benefiting from increased safe-haven demand [18][20].