Workflow
财政政策
icon
Search documents
沥青策略:单边观望、逢低做多沥青09-12价差
Guan Tong Qi Huo· 2025-06-25 09:47
【冠通研究】 沥青:低开震荡 制作日期:2025年6月25日 单边观望/逢低做多沥青09-12价差 期货方面: 今日沥青期货2509合约下跌1.89%至3574元/吨,5日均线下方,最低价在3537元/吨,最高价 3783元/吨,持仓量减少17999至251579手。 基差方面: 山东地区主流市场价下跌至3750元/吨,沥青09合约基差下跌至176元/吨,处于偏高水平。 投资有风险,入市需谨慎。 本公司具备期货交易咨询业务资格,请务必阅读最后一页免责声明。 【策略分析】 供应端,上周沥青开工率环比回落1.1个百分点至30.4%,较去年同期高了4.7个百分点,沥青开 工率转而回落,处于近年同期中性偏低水平。据隆众资讯数据,6月份地炼预计排产130.9万吨,环 比增加6.5万吨,增幅为5.2%,同比增加37万吨,增幅为39.3%。上周沥青下游各行业开工率涨跌互现, 其中道路沥青开工环比下降3个百分点至22.6%,仍处于近年同期最低水平,受到资金制约。上周山 东地区个别炼厂复产,加之原油价格上涨带动交投气氛,出货量增加较多,全国出货量环比增加 5.99%至28.83万吨,处于中性水平。沥青炼厂库存存货比本周环比继续 ...
央行大动作,降准降息新信号!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-25 07:47
央行连续超额续作中期借贷便利(MLF)净投放中长期资金。 为保持银行体系流动性充裕, 6月25日,央行以固定数量、利率招标、多重价位中标方式开展3000亿元 MLF操作,期限为1年期。 本月有1820亿元1年期MLF到期,这意味着,6月央行MLF净投放达到1180亿元,为连续第4个月加量续 作。叠加央行开展的2000亿元买断式逆回购操作,6月中期流动性净投放总额达3180亿元。业内人士表 示,面对政府债发行高峰与同业存单集中到期等因素,央行持续释放稳流动性、稳信心的政策信号,叠 加财政支出加快、银行资金融出意愿较强因素,季末资金面整体可控, 预计后续货币政策仍将保持适 度灵活,强化对实体经济的支持。 具体来看,央行5月净投放3750亿元、4月净投放5000亿元、3月净投放630亿元。此外,从3月起,为保 持银行体系流动性充裕,更好满足不同参与机构差异化资金需求,央行调整MLF操作方式,由单一价 位中标调整为多重价位中标(即美式招标)。不再有统一的中标利率,标志着MLF利率的政策属性完 全退出,利率市场化进程加速。 MLF持续净投放背后有着深刻的政策考量。东方金诚首席宏观分析师王青认为, 在5月降准释放长期流 ...
积极调整应对贸易环境变化
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-06-24 22:08
据世界经济论坛对多位机构首席经济学家的最新调查显示,当前全球经济发展前景不容乐观。对此,专 家学者有着怎样的思考和建议?如何看待地缘经济格局变化和技术加速演进背景下的全球经济增长前 景?6月24日,在第十六届夏季达沃斯论坛上,与会人士就此展开了深入讨论。 同时,与会专家普遍认为,经济全球化大势难以逆转。"经济全球化有力促进了世界商业繁荣和经济发 展,当前这个进程受阻,是众多跨国企业不愿意看到的局面,因为他们的业务及其增长都是基于经济全 球化。"波士顿咨询集团董事总经理兼高级合伙人阿帕那·巴拉德瓦杰表示,很多国家包括欧洲和"全球 南方"国家,都在鼓励本国企业参与全球化竞争,希望本国企业具有全球竞争力,众多企业也在迎头赶 上。 萨蒂拉泰介绍说,"从东南亚的情况看,经济全球化在加强而不是减弱。"疫情后东南亚旅游业快速恢 复,资本逐渐流入,越来越多国际化人才进入,当地消费者也从全球购买商品,世界很关注东南亚市 场。 "未来,经济全球化依然会存在,但其进程将深化,发展方式也将改变。"巴拉德瓦杰认为,跨国企业需 要适应更为复杂的国际化规则,包括如何更好地利用本地合作关系去开展业务,更好地融合"在地 化"和"全球化"。 ( ...
不确定性扰动全球市场 经济学家看好中国经济韧性
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-06-24 19:06
证券时报记者韩忠楠 6月24日,2025夏季达沃斯论坛拉开帷幕。 在论坛首日超50场分论坛活动中,围绕着世界经济秩序、贸易格局走势、AI技术发展、气候变化、能 源应用等方面的讨论不绝于耳,与会嘉宾在思想交锋的过程中,不约而同地将"不确定性"作为上述话题 讨论的核心背景。 "从实际经济指标来看,前几个季度的出口、工业生产等数据表现良好,反映出经济韧性犹存,这在一 定程度上得益于政府出台的提振消费等政策措施。"黄益平认为,虽然房地产行业在进行调整,外部世 界也充满不确定性,但中国总体的经济活动仍然表现坚毅。 世界经济论坛总裁博尔格·布伦德也表达对中国经济的看好。他表示,在世界经济形势严峻复杂背景 下,中国经济展现出强劲韧性。无论从中期看还是长远看,他都对中国经济抱乐观态度。 谈及如何应对全球经济面临的不确定性时,黄益平认为,短期内需要更加积极的财政政策;长期来看, 财政的可持续性需要充分考虑。 今年1月初,世界经济论坛发布的《首席经济学家展望报告》显示,全球经济将在2025年面临重大挑 战,56%的受访首席经济学家预计经济形势会走弱,仅17%的受访者认为经济形势会改善。 而在此次2025夏季达沃斯论坛首席经济学家 ...
鲍威尔:财政政策在某些时候处于不可持续趋势中。
news flash· 2025-06-24 15:03
鲍威尔:财政政策在某些时候处于不可持续趋势中。 ...
北大国发院院长:面对经济不确定性,短期需更积极的财政政策
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-06-24 09:35
Group 1 - The World Economic Forum's 16th Annual Meeting of the New Champions, also known as the "Summer Davos Forum," was held in Tianjin from June 24 to June 26 [1] - A majority of economists surveyed believe that current U.S. economic policies will have a lasting impact on the global economy, with 87% predicting delays in strategic business decisions and increased recession risks [3] - Huang Yiping, Dean of the National School of Development at Peking University, emphasized the need for more proactive fiscal policies in the face of economic uncertainty [3] Group 2 - Huang Yiping highlighted the importance of distinguishing between short-term and long-term fiscal policies, advocating for constraints on government spending to avoid sustainability issues [3] - The concept of fiscal sustainability was discussed, indicating its significance for the functioning of government and the achievement of national development strategies [4] - Huang also pointed out the necessity to boost domestic demand and consumption in China, given the changing dynamics of global markets [4] Group 3 - The chief economist's briefing indicated that artificial intelligence is expected to drive growth, but 47% of respondents anticipate job losses as a result [5]
直击夏季达沃斯|黄益平:以中国经济韧性应对全球不确定性
Core Insights - The 2025 Summer Davos Forum (New Champions Annual Meeting) is being held in Tianjin, highlighting global economic uncertainties and the impact of geopolitical conflicts on market confidence and inflation [2] Economic Performance - China's economy is currently performing steadily, with GDP growth expected to remain above 5% in Q2, indicating a generally positive economic outlook for the first half of the year [2] - Strong performance in exports and industrial production in recent quarters reflects the resilience of the economy, supported by government policies aimed at boosting consumption [2] Fiscal Policy Discussion - There is a need to differentiate between short-term and long-term fiscal policy objectives, with long-term fiscal health being crucial to avoid sustainability issues [3] - In response to external uncertainties that may slow economic growth, it is recommended to adopt an expansionary fiscal policy to create space for further economic stabilization [2][3]
因势利导,进退有度
Dong Zheng Qi Huo· 2025-06-24 04:16
Report Industry Investment Rating - The short - term (1 - 3 months), medium - term (3 - 6 months), and long - term (6 - 12 months) trend ratings for treasury bonds are all "oscillating" [5] Core Viewpoints of the Report - The fundamental situation is favorable for treasury bonds, with the bullish sentiment more obvious in the first half of the second half of the year, but the potential for further bullishness is limited. The market is expected to experience fluctuations, and investors are advised to adopt appropriate trading strategies [1][3][64] - Monetary policy is moderately loose, but the central bank may warn about interest - rate risks. Market sentiment is more cautious, and there are differences in institutional behavior and bond valuations compared to previous years, which limit the upward space of the bond market [2][65][88] - The bond market trend in the second half of the year is divided into three stages. Investment strategies include unilateral band operations, cross - variety strategies, and positive - arbitrage strategies for short - term varieties [3][92][96] Summary by Directory 1. 2025Q1 Treasury Bond Trend Review - In the first half of 2025, treasury bond futures went from weak to strong and then to narrow - range oscillation, experiencing three stages: decline from the beginning of the year to mid - March, rise from late March to early April, and narrow - range oscillation from mid - April to mid - June [15] - The yield curve first flattened and then oscillated. The basis of medium - and short - term varieties gradually returned to normal from a low level, while the basis of TL did not deviate significantly from the seasonal level [18] - The bond market showed new features this year, such as being insensitive to domestic economic fundamentals but sensitive to trade frictions, with the central bank having stronger regulatory ability, persistent negative carry for short - term varieties, and institutional behavior causing occasional disturbances [21] 2. Fiscal and Fundamental Aspects: The Trade War is Complex, and Domestic Low - Volatility Will Continue - **Trade War is Long - Term, Complex, and Has a "Stagflation" Effect**: The trade war is a long - term measure for the US to address its credit crisis. It is complex in its progress, and high tariffs will lead the US into a stagflation environment [24][27][31] - **Export Decline Pressure Becomes Apparent, and Domestic Demand Weakening Pressure Increases**: Trade frictions lead to a decline in overseas demand, which in turn reduces China's export growth. Domestic demand also faces challenges, especially in the real estate market, and consumption and private investment are also under pressure. Fiscal support is crucial for stabilizing demand [33][42][54] - **Fiscal Policy Supports the Economy, and Domestic Macroeconomy Runs with Low Volatility**: The proportion of functional finance is increasing. Fiscal policy should be moderately proactive, with a higher probability of quasi - fiscal policies. Fiscal policy will support economic growth, but the supply - demand imbalance will persist, and inflation will remain low [55][58][63] 3. Monetary Policy and Bond Market Valuation: Similar Policy Rhythms, Different Mindsets and Valuations - **Exchange - Rate Depreciation Pressure Eases, and Monetary Policy is Moderately Loose**: The RMB exchange - rate depreciation pressure has significantly eased. Monetary policy is moderately loose, with a high probability of a 10BP interest - rate cut in August - September. The central bank may warn about long - term interest - rate risks [65][66][73] - **Market Mindset, Institutional Behavior, and Bond Valuations Differ from Previous Years**: The market mindset is more cautious. Institutional behavior is affected by "liability shortage," and bond valuations are high, which limit the upward space of the bond market [78][81][87] 4. Market Outlook and Strategy: Actively Explore Futures Strategies - **Market Rhythm: Gradually Accelerate, Then Decline**: The bond market in the second half of the year is expected to go through three stages: strengthening from July - August, a high probability of decline from September - October, and slow strengthening from November - December [92][93] - **Strategy Analysis: Band - Operation Thinking, Explore Futures Strategies**: Unilateral strategies suggest that allocation portfolios should buy mid - term long positions on dips, and trading portfolios should conduct band operations. Cross - variety strategies recommend paying attention to the strategy of going long on 2TS and short on T. Positive - arbitrage strategies suggest seizing the tail - end opportunities of short - term varieties. Hedging strategies recommend paying attention to short - hedging strategies from September - October [96][98][103]
博时市场点评6月23日:三大指数反弹,计算机涨幅领先
Xin Lang Ji Jin· 2025-06-23 08:51
每日观点 【博时市场点评6月23日】三大指数反弹,计算机涨幅领先 资金追踪 市场成交额为11470.95亿元,较前一交易日上涨。两融余额上周五收报18124.82亿元,较前一交易日下 跌。 数据来源:同花顺,截至2025年6月23日。基金有风险,投资需谨慎。基金管理人承诺以诚实信用、勤 勉尽责的原则管理和运用基金资产,但不保证基金一定盈利,也不保证收益。基金的过往业绩并不预示 其未来表现。 6月22日,在中国人民银行和香港金融管理局共同推动下,跨境支付通正式上线,标志着内地与香港快 速支付系统已实现互联互通,今后两地居民可实时办理跨境汇款。当日,全国首笔跨境支付通内地居民 南向、港人北向汇款业务落地深圳。 简评:跨境支付通是内地与香港合作的重要举措之一,通过连接内地与香港快速支付系统实现互联互 通,有效提升跨境支付效率,便利经贸活动和人员往来,有利于巩固和提升香港国际金融中心及离岸人 民币业务枢纽的地位,更好地满足内地与香港居民对跨境汇款和支付的需求。 市场复盘 6月23日,A股三大指数上涨。截至收盘,上证指数报3381.58点,上涨0.65%;深证成指报10048.39点, 上涨0.43%;创业板指报201 ...
如何实现投资与消费的相互促进
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-22 20:32
Group 1 - The relationship between investment and consumption is interdependent, and both are essential for expanding total demand in the economy [2][3] - Government spending should focus on both investment and consumption to stimulate economic growth, with current policies showing a structural bias towards investment [2][3] - The accumulation of material capital through investment is fundamental for economic growth, while consumption contributes to human capital, which is increasingly important in an innovation-driven economy [2][4] Group 2 - The debate over whether to prioritize investment or consumption is less productive than understanding their relationship within the overall economic cycle [3] - Government spending has become an integral part of daily economic cycles, and its effectiveness is hindered by issues such as mismatched flows and uncertainty in spending responsibilities [3][6] - A shift towards a human-centered logic in economic development is necessary, focusing on meeting people's needs through both investment and consumption [4][5] Group 3 - Urban-rural dualism restricts the mobility of farmers, impacting their access to equal public services and opportunities, which highlights the need for government investment and consumption to address these social identity issues [5][6] - Promoting social equity requires addressing inequalities in starting points and opportunities, with government policies aimed at facilitating migration and urbanization [7] - The central-local fiscal relationship is crucial for effective government investment and consumption, with local government spending being a significant component of overall fiscal policy [8][9] Group 4 - Current data shows that central government spending has increased by 9%, while local government spending has only grown by 3.9%, indicating insufficient expansion at the local level [9] - To implement more effective fiscal policies, reforms in the central-local fiscal relationship are essential, particularly in increasing the share of central government spending [9]