Group 1: Recent Trends in Hong Kong Listings - A surge in mainland companies seeking to list in Hong Kong has been observed, with 8 A-share companies completing IPOs since September last year, raising a total of 981.1 billion HKD [1] - Nearly 50 A-share companies are planning to list in Hong Kong, with over 20 already having submitted materials or received approval [1] - Policy support has been identified as a key factor driving this trend, particularly for technology companies [1][2] Group 2: Regulatory Support and Market Conditions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is committed to promoting high-level capital market openness and supporting technology companies in utilizing both domestic and international markets [2] - The Hong Kong Stock Exchange has optimized its listing system, lowering barriers and introducing mechanisms like "dual-class shares" to facilitate listings for new economy enterprises [2] - The implementation of new regulations for overseas listings has seen 242 mainland companies complete their registration, with 83 being technology firms [3] Group 3: Benefits of Listing in Hong Kong - Listing in Hong Kong allows companies to access global investors, broaden financing channels, and enhance international visibility and brand value [4] - The presence of more mainland companies in Hong Kong is expected to strengthen Hong Kong's position as an international financial center [5] - Hong Kong serves as a gateway for global investors to enter mainland China, benefiting from a diverse product and client ecosystem [6] Group 4: Banking Sector Support - Financial institutions are playing a crucial role in supporting mainland companies in their Hong Kong listing endeavors, providing comprehensive financial consulting and information services [7] - The introduction of the "18C" listing rules has lowered the entry barriers for technology companies, creating dedicated financing channels [7] - Banks are also offering various financial products post-listing to support companies in their growth and strategic initiatives [8]

股票市场对贸易战预期反应趋于理性，而债券市场主要定价流动性而非 贸易战影响，央行政策是关键驱动因素。 未来需密切关注 6 月份出口数据，特别是抢出口效应减弱的迹象，这将 是判断债券市场机会的重要信号。 债券市场的大机会主要来自经济数据催化，尤其是地产数据，地产下行 会放大出口和生产的负面影响。 贸易战对中国债市的影响已部分定价，未来需关注实际影响；美债表现 疲软，反映了增长和流动性预期以及金融秩序重塑。 美元信用资产表现偏弱，与传统避险逻辑不符，反映了金融秩序重塑的 不确定性和对美国财政扩张的担忧。 全球市场中，股票定价贸易规则影响，避险资产如黄金、比特币因对金 融秩序重塑敏感而走强，大宗商品震荡。 预计 2025 年将是 10 年期国债牛市的尾部阶段，下半年基本面定价逻 辑将主导，出口带动地产走低，利率仍有下行空间。 Q&A 当前市场对中美贸易战的预期定价趋势如何？ 当前市场对中美贸易战的预期定价呈现出疲软趋势。最初在四五月份，市场风 险偏好极度收缩，但随着时间推移，市场选择不提前判断贸易规则的不确定性。 因此，从四月下旬到整个五月，相关板块并未获得非常乐观的定价，更加侧重 现实端。尽管上周中美两国首脑会谈 ...

点击小程序查看报告原文 Abstract 摘要 当前国际货币体系正在经历一场深刻变革。美国公共债务长期无序扩张，俄乌冲突中的美元"武器化"[1]，以及特朗普2.0时期的一系列政策主张，持续侵 蚀美元作为国际储备货币的信用基础。这一结构性变化既影响全球贸易与经济稳定，也孕育着国际货币体系重构的历史契机。"有时候几十年里什么都没 发生，有时候几星期就发生了几十年的大事。"我们可能正在见证国际货币秩序的关键转折。然而，长期以来，人们对国际货币体系存在诸多认知偏差， 既有根深蒂固的传统误解，也有大变局下催生的新困惑。本文梳理了国际货币体系中最具代表性的十个"未解之谜"。尝试对这些谜题的分析与解答，有助 于我们理解国际货币体系的运行特点与演进方向，也可能成为全球治理的关键密码。 谜题一："特里芬难题"的误读与误导 布雷顿森林体系解体后，"特里芬难题"发展出经常账户与"安全资产"两个版本，既有对储备货币需要以经常账户赤字为前提的误读，更有故意以储备货币 地位导致赤字因而是严重负担的误导。这存在三个误区：混淆净资本与总资本流入，混淆"赚来的"和"借来的"外汇储备，混淆双边与多边资本流动。我们 认为，只要实现大规模对外投资， ...

央行新增信息披露态度呵护 隔夜利率逼近 1.4% —— 流动性与机构行为周度跟踪 250608 [[Table_R Table_Report eportTTime ime]] 2025 年 6 月 8 日 请阅读最后一页免责声明及信息披露 http://www.cindasc.com 1 歌声ue 证券研究报告 债券研究 [Table_ReportType] 专题报告 联系电话：+86 18817583889 邮 箱： liyishuang@cindasc.com [➢Table_Summary] 货币市场：本周央行 OMO 净回笼 6717 亿，周五买断式逆回购招标 10000 亿。 尽管本周初企业所得税汇算清缴走款带来了一定扰动，逆回购整体维持净回 笼，但资金面整体仍维持宽松，周五买断式逆回购落地，DR007 降至 1.53%。 ➢ 质押式回购成交量在周四升至 7.86 万亿的年内新高后小幅回落，全周日均 成交上升 1.0 万亿至 7.50 万亿；质押式回购整体规模同样在周四创下 1 月 以来的新高后回落，但仍明显高于上周。各类银行净融出上半周均有所抬升， 下半周股份行与城商行净融出回落，大行净融出升破 ...

[Table_IndNameRptType]2 固定收益 固收周报 大行买短债的三个细节 ——债市机构行为周报（6 月第 2 周） 报告日期： 2025-06-08 [Table_Author] 首席分析师：颜子琦 执业证书号：S0010522030002 电话：13127532070 邮箱：yanzq@hazq.com [Table_Author] 研究助理：洪子彦 执业证书号：S0010123060036 电话：15851599909 邮箱：hongziyan@hazq.com 本周综述： 第一，周度看大行的买债并不是集中在短端。先从券种看，本周大行主 要买入的是国债而非政金债（值得注意的是去年大行买短的行为是同时 买入短端国债+政金债），并且国债的买入期限主要为 1-3Y，量级为 1Y 国债的 2 倍以上，此外，本周大行同样买入了不少金额的 7Y 与 10Y 国债。从这一点看，从大行买短债推测央行是否重启国债购买的可能性 或不高。 第二，大行的资金融出虽然回升到 4 万亿以上，但银行融出存在结构性 分化。本周央行公开市场净回笼，但投放买断式逆回购 1 万亿元，从资 金融出情况看大行在周四开始融出回升至 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent adjustment of tariffs between China and the U.S. has led to a surge in export activities among Chinese foreign trade companies, as they aim to fulfill backlog orders within a 90-day window to avoid higher tariffs in the future [1][2][4]. Group 1: Impact on Export Activities - Many foreign trade companies are racing to secure shipping slots and expedite production to meet U.S. customer orders within the 90-day window [1][5]. - The manufacturing PMI in May increased to 49.5%, indicating improved export conditions due to the tariff adjustments [4]. - Shanghai port's container throughput reached 4.65 million TEUs in May, a year-on-year increase of 10.2%, reflecting the heightened export activities [5]. Group 2: Banking Sector Response - Banks are closely monitoring the export activities of foreign trade companies, as the ability to deliver orders within the 90-day window is crucial for trade financing [2][8]. - Banks are adjusting their credit strategies based on the latest trends in export activities, providing support to companies that can meet the delivery deadlines [11]. - There is a growing demand for customized financial services from banks to support the unique needs of different foreign trade companies [3][10]. Group 3: Challenges and Strategies - Some foreign trade companies are facing challenges in securing shipping slots and managing production schedules, leading to varying levels of confidence in meeting the 90-day deadline [9]. - Companies are considering changing their contracts to FOB pricing to mitigate risks associated with tariff fluctuations [6][10]. - The uncertainty surrounding U.S. tariff policies has led to increased interest in foreign exchange risk hedging products among small and medium-sized foreign trade enterprises [10].

行业研究 非银行金融 2025 年 06 月 07 日 证 券 研 究 报 告 金融资金面跟踪：量化周报（2025/06/02~2025/06/06） 推荐（维持） 成交量有所提升，基差总体有所收敛 华创证券研究所 证券分析师：徐康 电话：021-20572556 邮箱：xukang@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360518060005 证券分析师：刘潇伟 邮箱：liuxiaowei@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360525020001 上周量化私募总体正超额。上周样本量化私募收益及超额如下：1）300 增强策略周 /月/年初以来平均收益分别为-0.4%/+3%/+1.3%，周/月/年初以来平均超额分别为 +0.6%/+1%/+4.5%；2）500 增强策略周/月/年初以来平均收益分别为+0.7%/+3.5%/+5.6%， 周/月/年初以来平均超额分别为+0.2%/+2.4%/+9.4%；3）A500 增强策略周/月/年初以来平 均收益分别为-0.4%/+3.1%/+8.9%，周/月/年初以来平均超额分别为+0.6%/+1.3%/+12.5%； 4）1000 增强策略周/月/年初以来平均收益分别为 ...

金融科技（FinTech）行业 | 洞察报告 核心摘要： 在信创建设稳步推进的背景下，建设以技术迭代与创新化应用为核心驱动的金融业务价值提升体系 ， 政策 聚焦 "科技-产业-金融"为主体的科技金融循环体系建设，强调数据要素在金融业务场景的多元化、依法合 规应用 。 金融市场的繁荣与科技行业的飞速发展共同推动国内金融科技市场规模持续走高，预计将以约 13.3%的复合增长率于2028年突破6500亿元 。本篇报告将结合业内专家观点与典型案例展示，分析在 《金融科技发展规划（ 2022-2025）》收官之年，国内金融机构数智化转型进程与金融科技行业的发展现 状。 近况解读：国内金融科技行业现状分析 在信创建设稳步推进的背景下，建设以技术迭代与创新化应用为核心驱动的金融业务 价值提升体系 政策剖析:近年金融科技行业政策解读 政策聚焦"科技-产业-金融"为主体的科技金融循环体系建设，强调数据要素在金融业 务场景的多元化、依法合规应用 随着金融科技应用与数智化转型进程的推进，国内金融机构已从"立梁架柱"的统筹阶段逐步迈 入"厚积成势"的攻坚阶段，指导性政策的关注点逐渐由技术在业务场景的应用转向产品技术的 可持续迭代与回 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the successful launch and growth of the "Technology Board" in the bond market, with a total issuance scale of 4,172 billion yuan within the first month [2][3] - The issuance scale of the technology bonds accounted for 17.4% of the total market issuance during the same period, indicating strong demand from various issuers [2] - Commercial banks were the most active participants, issuing 1,910 billion yuan, which represents 45.8% of the total issuance [2][3] Group 2 - The structure of issuers has improved, with the proportion of private enterprises in non-financial technology bonds increasing from 10.1% in the first four months of 2025 to 12.5% in May [2] - The majority of newly issued technology bonds by private enterprises had a maturity of less than three years, while nearly 80% of the total issuance had a maturity of over three years [3][4] - The average issuance interest rate for bank-issued technology bonds was 1.67%, with funds directed towards technology loans and investments in technology innovation enterprises [4] Group 3 - Financial institutions, including banks and securities firms, actively participated in the issuance of technology bonds, with 23 securities firms involved [5] - The longest maturity for a technology bond issued by a securities firm was 10 years, with a significant portion of the funds allocated to support technology innovation [5] - Risk-sharing mechanisms, such as credit default swaps and risk mitigation certificates, have become popular tools in the design of technology bonds [6] Group 4 - The introduction of risk-sharing tools is expected to enhance the accessibility and convenience of financing for private enterprises and early-stage technology companies [6] - Future innovations in yield mechanisms could attract more investors to participate in technology bonds issued by small and medium-sized private technology enterprises [7] - The "Technology Board" in the bond market is anticipated to play a significant role in supporting technological innovation and progress in the future [7]

Group 1: Guangdong Government Investment Fund Management - The Guangdong Provincial Government has issued the "Management Measures for Government Investment Funds," which clarifies that government-funded funds do not need to set internal benchmark return rates [2] - The establishment of government investment funds requires approval from the same-level government, and county-level governments must control the creation of new funds [2] - The performance evaluation of government investment funds will focus on the comprehensive achievement of policy objectives rather than profitability [2] Group 2: Chongqing State-Owned Enterprise Reform - Chongqing has completed the strategic restructuring and professional integration of its key state-owned enterprises, reducing the number from 51 to 33 large enterprise groups [4] - The overall loss rate of key state-owned enterprises in Chongqing has decreased from 40% to 18.6%, with operational losses down to 13.7% after significant loss reduction efforts [4][5] - Chongqing's state-owned enterprises have activated assets worth 151 billion yuan, recovering 59.5 billion yuan, contributing to economic growth and job creation [5] Group 3: Hubei Green Low-Carbon Industry Development Alliance - The Hubei Green Low-Carbon Industry Development Alliance has been established, consisting of 124 initial member units, including key enterprises, research institutions, and financial organizations [7] - The alliance aims to support the green transformation and high-quality development of various enterprises in Hubei Province by enhancing strategic guidance and building cooperative platforms [7] - The alliance's council includes major companies and institutions, indicating a collaborative effort towards advancing the green low-carbon industry in the region [7]