固收-债市平论 20260126 摘要 央行通过 MLF 净投放 7,000 亿元，显著提振债券市场，但未来利率下 行节奏或将放缓，10 年期国债收益率下限预计在 1.8%-1.9%区间震荡， 大银行协助央行控制下限。 2 月份利率预计震荡，信用市场偏强，建议交易盘关注 3-5 年二级资本 债，配置盘可拉长久期，关注超长期利率债和 5 年以上二级资本债；3 月后利率仍有较大机会，建议以时间换空间。 2026 年财政政策总量增加和政府负债水平较低提振市场预期，但财政 增量预计不会超预期，支出更注重结构和效用，如支持民间投资和中小 微企业贷款贴息。 1 月政府融资约 1.2 万亿元，其中国债 0.47 万亿元，地方政府债超 0.6 万亿元。关键期限国债发行量增加，30 年国债认购热情高涨，需求端表 现强劲，地方债发行边际修复。 开年以来信用市场表现强劲，3-5 年二级资本债热度较高，市场倾向于 博弈确定性并获取票息收入。一季度摊余成本法估值的再配置规模增加， 3-4 月信用债仍具确定性，建议关注 3-5 年二永资本。 Q&A 近期债券市场收益率下行的主要原因是什么？ 近期债券市场收益率下行主要是由于前期供给压力有 ...

这下，华尔街专家们可是真的坐不住了。毕竟，美元信用是美国全球经济霸权的基石，而美债则是支撑 这一基石的核心资产，更何况，如今美国早已债台高筑，如果美债崩盘，后果不堪设想。 为此，有美媒就预测，美国政府与美联储下一步可能会用出4招，试图以此稳定美债、修复美元信用， 具体招数包括：靠美联储印钱和降息来接盘；通过立法将稳定币与短期美债强行捆绑，将稳定币变成美 债的专属接盘工具；将黄金储备按市价重新估值；用军事、贸易等利益做筹码，逼着日本、欧洲等盟友 多买美债。 不过，随着美国财政赤字越来越高，特朗普又在加速抛弃盟友，这4招的效果也正越来越差。而更让经 济专家们担心的是，这些干预手段很可能对中国无效。 特朗普对全球的肆意霸凌，早已引发了各国的反感，而美债，就成了全球反击美国的有力武器。 去年，日本曾抛售美债，换来了特朗普在关税问题上的部分妥协；前几天，欧洲也威胁说，会用抛售美 债来应对格陵兰岛问题。但是这两天，美国专家却惊讶发现，中国才是不声不响干大事的那个。 根据美媒的最新报道，截至2025年底，中国已经连续14个月减持美债，抛售速度有所加快，至11月底， 中国持有的美债只剩6826亿美元，创下2008年以来新低。 ...

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the report 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The liquidity of funds during the tax period fluctuated moderately, and the yields of interest - rate bonds continued to decline. The yields of most maturities of treasury bonds and CDB bonds decreased this week, with the 1 - year treasury bond yield being an exception, which increased by 4bp [1][2] - The domestic bond market showed a good performance after getting rid of the weak start of the year, but the further downward space of yields was limited due to stock market disturbances. The yield of 10 - year treasury bonds remained stable at around 1.8%, and it was expected that it would be difficult to decline further before the Spring Festival. The stock market presented a differentiated pattern [7] - Overseas bond markets were mainly affected by the intensified geopolitical conflict in the Middle East. Although the probability of a war against Iran was low, the risk of miscalculation among parties still existed. The Fed's interest - rate decision in the next week was relatively certain, and the market generally expected no interest - rate cut [7] 3. Summary by Related Content 3.1 Fund Liquidity - This week, DR007 ranged from 1.48% to 1.51%, and DR001 ranged from 1.32% to 1.42%. The central value changed little compared with the previous week, and the fluctuation of DR007 decreased [1] 3.2 Yield Changes of Interest - rate Bonds - Treasury bonds: The 1 - year yield increased by 4bp, the 3 - year, 5 - year, and 10 - year yields decreased by 1bp each, and the 7 - year yield decreased by 3bp [2][3] - CDB bonds: The 1 - year, 3 - year, 5 - year, 7 - year, and 10 - year yields decreased by 1bp, 1bp, 3bp, 3bp, and 5bp respectively [2][3] 3.3 Term Spread Changes - On January 23, the 10 - 1Y term spread of treasury bonds was 54.79bp, and that of CDB bonds was 39.76bp, narrowing by 5.21bp and 2.34bp respectively compared with January 16 [5] 3.4 Market Conditions at Home and Abroad - Domestic: The bond market performed well, but the stock market affected the downward space of bond yields. The stock market was differentiated, with large and medium - cap stocks weakening and small - cap stocks rising [7] - Overseas: Geopolitical conflicts in the Middle East affected overseas bond markets. The Fed's interest - rate decision was relatively certain, with no expected interest - rate cut [7]

Group 1 - The issuance of industrial perpetual bonds is primarily by high-rated entities, with an increase in issuance duration over the past two years. The main purpose of issuing these bonds is to reduce liabilities, predominantly by medium to high-rated central and state-owned enterprises in high-leverage industries. Since 2024, the issuance duration of industrial perpetual bonds has lengthened, with "3+N" still being the main issuance type, but the scale and proportion of "5+N" industrial perpetual bonds have significantly increased, possibly related to expectations of debt reduction and the overall lengthening of credit bond issuance duration [6][7]. - The spread of industrial perpetual bond varieties has widened to a high percentile, indicating opportunities for spread extraction. Since the second half of 2025, the spread of industrial perpetual bond varieties has continued to widen, influenced by two main factors: first, the marginal weakening of demand for perpetual bonds under the insurance I9 accounting standards, as the static coupon of perpetual bonds is weaker than that of dividend stocks; second, perpetual bonds are less likely to benefit from the expansion of credit bond ETFs due to stricter definitions of equity instruments. Currently, the spread of industrial perpetual bonds has widened to a high percentile since 2024, with the spread of varieties accounting for about 50% of the overall spread, reaching a high level since 2020. It is believed that institutional behavior will have limited further disturbance to industrial perpetual bonds, and attention should be paid to opportunities for spread extraction [7][8]. Group 2 - In the primary issuance market, net financing has increased. From January 19 to January 23, 2026, short-term financing bonds issued amounted to 128.06 billion yuan, with 86.04 billion yuan maturing; medium-term notes issued were 91.51 billion yuan, with 28.01 billion yuan maturing; corporate bonds issued were 1 billion yuan, with 4.1 billion yuan maturing; and company bonds issued were 102.05 billion yuan, with 52.55 billion yuan maturing. The total issuance of major credit bond varieties was 322.61 billion yuan, with 170.7 billion yuan maturing, resulting in a net financing of 151.91 billion yuan, an increase from the previous week's net financing of 49.27 billion yuan [8]. - In the secondary trading market, transaction volume has increased, and most spreads have narrowed. From January 19 to January 23, 2026, the total transaction volume of major credit bond varieties (corporate bonds, company bonds, medium-term notes, and short-term financing bonds) reached 931.2 billion yuan, an increase of 69.4 billion yuan compared to the previous week. The overall yield of medium-term notes has decreased, with the 3-year AAA medium-term note yield down by 3.43 basis points to 1.85%, the 3-year AA+ medium-term note yield down by 4.43 basis points to 1.93%, and the 3-year AA medium-term note yield down by 4.43 basis points to 2.08% [13][14].

Asset Overview - International gold and silver prices have reached historical highs, with gold surpassing $4,990 per ounce and silver closing at $103 per ounce, marking a significant increase in safe-haven demand due to geopolitical uncertainties and a weakening dollar [1][8]. Cross-Asset Analysis - The ongoing U.S.-Europe negotiations regarding Greenland and tariffs have triggered a "TACO" trading environment, leading to significant market volatility. The U.S. dollar index fell by 1.9% during the week, reflecting a shift in market sentiment [7][8]. - Commodities have outperformed equities and bonds, with precious metals leading the gains. The overall commodity index rose by 2.1%, while the CRB commodity index increased by 3.4% [8][34]. Equity Market Performance - The Brazilian IBOVESPA index surged by 8.5%, outperforming other global indices. In contrast, major developed market indices, including the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones, experienced slight declines of 0.4% and 0.5%, respectively [23][25]. - Emerging markets showed resilience, with the A-share market rising by 1.8%, particularly benefiting from small-cap and growth stocks [23][25]. Bond Market Insights - The Chinese bond market exhibited a "bull flattening" trend, with the yield curve shifting downward. The 10-year yield decreased to 1.83%, while the 2-year yield fell to 1.40%, resulting in a narrowing of the 10Y-2Y spread [34][39]. - In contrast, U.S. Treasury yields showed a "bear flattening" pattern, with the 10-year yield rising to 4.24%. The market anticipates a stable interest rate path for 2026, with a potential rate hike in 2027 [34][39]. Commodity and Currency Trends - Commodities continued to rise, with significant gains in gold and silver prices, which have increased by 43.5% and 14.7% year-to-date, respectively [8][34]. - The U.S. dollar's decline has led to appreciation in major non-U.S. currencies, including the euro and yen, which rose by 0.7% and 0.6%, respectively [8][34].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information provided regarding the report's industry investment rating in the given content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the equity market last week (2026.01.19 - 2026.01.23), under the environment of continuous regulatory policy suppression and abundant liquidity, the market structure was highly differentiated. Weight - stocks in consumption, medicine, and finance declined significantly due to large - scale ETF redemptions by policy funds, while the growth direction was active, and the commercial space sector regained strength after adjustment. As the earnings period begins, the market may rotate towards profit recovery and valuation repair. With the in - depth implementation of anti - involution policies, the investment growth rates of various industries have turned negative, implying future supply contraction, while demand stabilizes under the background of fiscal stimulus and economic recovery. This shift in the supply - demand contradiction consolidates the performance inflection points of leading companies in cyclical sectors such as non - ferrous metals and chemicals, and also drives the rise of sectors with price - increase logic like photovoltaics, lithium batteries, and coal [2][10][12]. - In the fixed - income market last week, short - term bond yields rose, and long - term yields fell. The 1 - year Treasury yield rose 3.95BP to 1.28%, the 10 - year Treasury yield fell 1.26BP to 1.83%, and the 30 - year Treasury yield fell 1.65BP to 2.29%, narrowing the term spread. Some funds entered the bond market for safety as the stock market cooled. The central bank governor's statement about potential reserve requirement ratio and interest rate cuts, along with positive news from the Ministry of Finance and good 7 - year Treasury bond issuance results, contributed to the narrowing of the term spread and the decline of long - term interest rates. There is support for the bond market sentiment, and there are opportunities to capture band trading in ultra - long - term interest - rate bonds [3][13]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Weekly Market Observation 3.1.1 Equity Market Review and Observation - Index performance: Last week, the Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.84%, the CSI 300 fell 0.62%, and the ChiNext Index fell 0.34%. The average daily trading volume of the entire A - share market was 27,972 billion yuan, a decrease from the previous week [10]. - ETF funds: Overall, ETF funds showed a net outflow trend last week. The CSI 300ETF had the most significant share reduction, with 49.603 billion shares less in the past week. The CSI 1000, SSE 50, SSE STAR 50, and CSI A500 also had share reductions of 23.3 billion, 11.5 billion, 9.6 billion, and 7.9 billion respectively. Since January 15, patient funds have continuously redeemed a basket of ETFs, and during this period, some individual stocks with high weight in the index and actively priced by funds performed better. The market trading volume has shrunk from around 4 trillion to around 2.5 trillion, indicating that policy goals have achieved some results. Future market - overheating adjustment methods may focus on cracking down on hot money, relaxing IPOs, and executive share - sales, and the impact of ETF redemptions on the market may weaken marginally [11]. - External factors: The latest US economic data remains resilient, and the November PCE inflation data is in line with market expectations, with no obvious signs of inflation rebound. This week, the Federal Reserve will hold an interest - rate meeting, and the market will focus on the meeting and the earnings reports of large technology companies, especially on performance guidance and the sustainability of profit realization under high valuations. Overseas geopolitical conflicts are also an important short - term uncertainty factor, and market risk - aversion sentiment will remain before the situation in Iran is resolved [11]. 3.1.2 Pan - Fixed - Income Market Review and Observation - Domestic bond market: Last week, short - term bond yields in the domestic bond market rose, and long - term yields fell, narrowing the term spread. The 1 - year Treasury yield rose 3.95BP to 1.28%, the 10 - year Treasury yield fell 1.26BP to 1.83%, and the 30 - year Treasury yield fell 1.65BP to 2.29%. Some funds entered the bond market for safety as the stock market cooled. Positive factors such as the central bank governor's statement on potential reserve requirement ratio and interest rate cuts, the Ministry of Finance's press conference, and good 7 - year Treasury bond issuance results contributed to the narrowing of the term spread and the decline of long - term interest rates. There is support for the bond market sentiment, and there are opportunities to capture band trading in ultra - long - term interest - rate bonds [3][13]. - US Treasury yields: Last week, US Treasury yields fluctuated. The 1 - year US Treasury yield fell 2BP to 3.53%, the 2 - year yield rose 1BP to 3.60%, and the 10 - year yield remained flat at 4.24%. Trump's remarks about Greenland led to European selling of US Treasuries and a rise in yields, but his subsequent attitude reversed the trend. US Treasuries will likely continue to fluctuate in the future, with increased unpredictability [14]. - REITs: Last week, the CSI REITs Total Return Index rose 2.17% to 1047.51 points, and all types of REITs closed higher, with data centers, consumption, and warehousing leading the gains. In the primary market, 5 public REITs withdrew or terminated, including 4 initial projects and 1 expansion project [14][15]. 3.1.3 Public Fund Market Dynamics On January 23, 2026, the China Securities Regulatory Commission issued the "Guidelines for the Performance Comparison Benchmark of Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds," and the Asset Management Association of China issued the "Operation Rules for the Performance Comparison Benchmark of Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds." The official versions are generally consistent with the draft versions, with some adjustments including clarifying restrictions on benchmark changes, exempting money - market funds from disclosing performance - benchmark comparisons, and modifying the requirements for long - term performance evaluation by fund evaluation institutions [16]. 3.2 Fund Index Performance Tracking 3.2.1 Equity Strategy Theme - Based Index - Active Stock Fund Selection Index: The index selects 15 funds each period, with equal - weight allocation. It selects active equity funds based on performance competitiveness and style stability within value, balanced, and growth styles, and allocates them according to the style distribution of the CSI Equity - Oriented Fund Index (930950.CSI). The performance benchmark is the CSI Equity - Oriented Fund Index (930950.CSI) [20][21]. 3.2.2 Investment Style - Based Index - Value Stock Fund Selection Index: It includes both deep - value and quality - value styles. It selects 10 funds of deep - value, quality - value, and balanced - value styles based on multi - period style classification. The performance benchmark is the CSI 800 Value Index (H30356.CSI) [24]. - Balanced Stock Fund Selection Index: It selects 10 funds of relatively balanced and value - growth styles based on multi - period style classification. The performance benchmark is the CSI 800 (000906.SH) [24]. - Growth Stock Fund Selection Index: It aims to capture the performance and valuation double - click opportunities of high - growth companies and select "dark - horse" stocks. It selects 10 funds of active - growth, quality - growth, and balanced - growth styles based on multi - period style classification. The performance benchmark is the 800 Growth (H30355.CSI) [27]. 3.2.3 Industry Theme - Based Index - Pharmaceutical Stock Fund Selection Index: It classifies funds according to the intersection market value of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of the CITIC Pharmaceutical Index (with an average purity of not less than 60% in the past 3 years or since inception). It constructs an evaluation system in the eligible sample, considering factors such as relative benchmark index win - rate, product drawdown, style stability, and overall performance competitiveness, and selects 15 funds to form the index. The performance benchmark is the pharmaceutical theme fund index (fitted by Huabao Securities' fund research and investment platform) [30][31]. - Consumption Stock Fund Selection Index: It classifies funds according to the intersection market value of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of relevant CITIC consumption - related indices (with an average purity of not less than 50% in the past 3 years or since inception). It constructs an evaluation system in the eligible sample and selects 10 funds to form the index. The performance benchmark is the consumption theme fund index (fitted by Huabao Securities' fund research and investment platform) [31][32]. - Technology Stock Fund Selection Index: It classifies funds according to the intersection market value of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of relevant CITIC technology - related indices (with an average purity of not less than 60% in the past 3 years or since inception). It constructs an evaluation system in the eligible sample and selects 10 funds to form the index. The performance benchmark is the technology theme fund index (fitted by Huabao Securities' fund research and investment platform) [35]. - High - End Manufacturing Stock Fund Selection Index: It classifies funds according to the intersection market value of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of relevant CITIC high - end manufacturing - related indices (with an average purity of not less than 50% in the past 3 years or since inception). It constructs an evaluation system in the eligible sample and selects 10 funds to form the index. The performance benchmark is the high - end manufacturing theme fund index (fitted by Huabao Securities' fund research and investment platform) [40][41]. - Cyclical Stock Fund Selection Index: It classifies funds according to the intersection market value of fund equity holdings and the constituent stocks of relevant CITIC cyclical - related indices (with an average purity of not less than 50% in the past 3 years or since inception). It constructs an evaluation system in the eligible sample and selects 5 funds to form the index. The performance benchmark is the cyclical theme fund index (fitted by Huabao Securities' fund research and investment platform) [43][44]. 3.2.4 Money - Market Enhancement Index - Money - Market Enhancement Strategy Index: It aims at liquidity management, pursuing a curve that exceeds money - market funds and is smooth and upward. It mainly allocates money - market funds with relatively good performance and passive index - bond funds (inter - bank certificate of deposit index funds). The performance benchmark is the CSI Money - Market Fund Index (H11025.CSI) [47]. 3.2.5 Pure - Bond Index - Short - Term Bond Fund Selection Index: It aims at liquidity management, pursuing a smooth and upward curve while controlling drawdown. It mainly allocates 5 funds with stable long - term returns, strict drawdown control, and significant absolute - return ability. The performance benchmark is 50% * Short - Term Pure - Bond Fund Index + 50% * Ordinary Money - Market Fund Index [50]. - Medium - and Long - Term Bond Fund Selection Index: It invests in medium - and long - term pure - bond funds, aiming for stable returns while controlling drawdown. It selects 5 funds with both return and drawdown control, and adjusts the duration and the ratio of credit - bond funds and interest - rate bond funds according to market conditions. The performance benchmark is not clearly stated in a simple formula in the text [52]. 3.2.6 Fixed - Income + Index - Low - Volatility Fixed - Income + Selection Index: The equity center is set at 10%. It selects 10 fixed - income + funds with an equity center (considering convertible bond and stock positions) of less than 15% in the past three years and recently. It focuses on the risk - return ratio and holding experience. The performance benchmark is 10% CSI 800 Index + 90% ChinaBond New Composite Full - Price Index (CBA00303.CS) [55]. - Medium - Volatility Fixed - Income + Selection Index: The equity center is set at 20%. It selects 5 fixed - income + funds with an equity center between 15% and 25% in the past three years and recently, emphasizing the risk - return ratio and performance elasticity. The performance benchmark is 20% CSI 800 Index + 80% ChinaBond New Composite Full - Price Index (CBA00303.CS) [58]. - High - Volatility Fixed - Income + Selection Index: The equity center is set at 30%. It selects 5 fixed - income + funds with an equity center between 25% and 35% in the past three years and recently, emphasizing the risk - return ratio and performance elasticity. It selects funds with stable bond - end returns, no credit - downgrading, and strong stock - selection ability on the equity end. The performance benchmark is 30% CSI 800 Index + 70% ChinaBond New Composite Full - Price Index (CBA00303.CS) [61]. 3.2.7 Other Pan - Fixed - Income Index - Convertible Bond Fund Selection Index: It selects bond funds with an average convertible - bond investment proportion of not less than 60% in the latest period and not less than 80% in the past four quarters as the sample space. It constructs an evaluation system from the fund product, fund manager, and fund company dimensions, considering factors such as long - and short - term returns, drawdown, risk - adjusted returns, and the manager's timing and bond - selection abilities, and selects 5 funds to form the index [64]. - QDII Bond Fund Selection Index: It selects 6 QDII bond funds with stable returns and good risk control based on credit and duration conditions. The underlying assets of QDII bond funds are overseas bonds, covering regions such as the world, Asia, and emerging markets, and investment targets include Chinese - funded US dollar bonds and US dollar bonds [67]. - REITs Fund Selection Index: It selects 10 REITs funds with stable operation, reasonable valuation, and certain elasticity based on the underlying asset type. The underlying assets of REITs are mainly mature, high - quality, and stable - operating infrastructure projects, with relatively clear cash - flow expectations and limited unit - net - value volatility [68].

Core Insights - The Free Trade Zone Bonds (referred to as "FTZ Bonds") have evolved over the past decade into a key innovation for China's financial openness, establishing a market ecosystem characterized by cross-border features and risk resilience [1][3] - The issuance of FTZ Bonds has created efficient channels for cross-border financing for the real economy and has accumulated valuable experiences for institutional openness [1][3] - Future developments should draw on experiences from mature markets like London and Hong Kong to further activate market potential and allow domestic and foreign capital to share in China's opportunities [1][3] Market Development - FTZ Bonds serve as a "two-way bridge" linking domestic and foreign capital markets, with a cumulative issuance of approximately 130 billion yuan by June 2025, attracting diverse issuers and investors [3] - The first issuance of the "Yulan Bond" in January 2026 marked a significant step in providing offshore financing paths for financial institutions in the FTZ, with a cumulative issuance exceeding 22 billion yuan and a year-on-year growth rate of over 40% [3][4] Strategic Focus - FTZ Bonds should focus on three core areas: supporting national strategies, empowering the real economy, and promoting the internationalization of the renminbi [4] - The market still has potential for growth, with limited participation channels for domestic investors and high costs for foreign investors due to issues like custody and settlement mechanisms [4] Legislative Framework - The introduction of the "Regulations on the Development of FTZ Offshore Bond Business" in December 2025 marks a new phase for the FTZ Bond market, providing clear institutional expectations and defining the boundaries of FTZ offshore bonds [5][6] - The regulations aim to enhance market governance through a combination of government oversight, regulatory collaboration, and industry self-discipline [5][6] Future Directions - The FTZ Bond market should continuously adapt to market needs and international experiences, focusing on functional orientation, flexible institutional frameworks, and optimizing key mechanisms [6][7] - Efforts should be made to lower participation costs for international investors and broaden participation channels for domestic investors, including integrating FTZ Bonds into liquidity asset measurements for commercial banks [9][10] Ecosystem Development - The development of a professional intermediary service system is essential for enhancing the efficiency of the entire service chain, including underwriting, legal, rating, and auditing services [10] - Risk management mechanisms must be strengthened, including monitoring cross-border capital flows and establishing clear rules for investor rights protection [11]

周一，美国10年期国债收益率跌至约4.22%，创下一周新低。走势主要源于美联储即将公布政策决议的市场预期，投资者提前 调整仓位，市场普遍认为美联储将维持现有利率水平不变。 投资者还将进一步消化美国近期密集发布的多项经济数据，包括耐用品订单、生产者价格指数、进出口贸易数据及房价指标。 其中，耐用品订单反映制造业活动及未来生产趋势，生产者价格指数关联通胀水平，这些数据为投资者判断经济走势、调整策 略提供参考，同时间接影响国债市场。 贸易紧张局势的持续升温，也加剧了全球市场的不确定性。相关方面发出警告，若加拿大与中国达成交易协议，可能会面临相 关关税惩罚。这种贸易层面的不确定性，使得市场避险情绪有所上升，部分资金流向国债等相对稳健的资产，也对国债收益率 的走低起到了一定的推动作用。 市场核心关注点之一是美联储即将释放的政策信号，尤其是降息时机。目前市场预期，今年晚些时候美联储可能实施两次25个 基点的降息。这一预期直接影响国债市场资金流向，也是近期收益率波动的重要诱因，美联储利率政策始终是全球债券市场的 关键影响因素。 除了美联储政策决议，美联储主席人选的变动也成为市场关注的焦点。据悉，相关方面预计将宣布接替现任美 ...

Core Viewpoint - The bond market is experiencing a period of consolidation, with government bond futures mostly declining and interbank bond yields fluctuating within a narrow range. The recent increase in MLF (Medium-term Lending Facility) has boosted trading sentiment but has diminished expectations for short-term rate cuts, leading to insufficient momentum for a significant rally in the bond market [1]. Market Performance - Government bond futures closed mostly lower, with the 30-year main contract up 0.20% at 112.51, while the 10-year, 5-year, and 2-year contracts all fell by 0.02% [2]. - The interbank yield on the 30-year government bond decreased by 0.3 basis points to 2.243%, while the 10-year government bond yield increased by 0.2 basis points to 1.943% [2]. - The China Convertible Bond Index fell by 1.19% to 528.14, with a total transaction amount of 927.91 billion [2]. Overseas Bond Market - In North America, U.S. Treasury yields fell across the board, with the 2-year yield down 0.13 basis points to 3.594% and the 10-year yield down 1.57 basis points to 4.225% [3]. - In Asia, Japanese bond yields also declined, with the 10-year yield down 2.1 basis points to 2.237% [3]. - In the Eurozone, the 10-year French bond yield fell by 2.2 basis points to 3.492%, while the German bond yield rose by 1.9 basis points to 2.904% [3]. Primary Market - Agricultural Development Bank's three issues of financial bonds had bidding yields below the China Bond valuation, with yields of 1.4638%, 1.6140%, and 1.9556% for 1.0356-year, 3-year, and 10-year bonds, respectively [4]. - Chongqing's 10-year bonds had a bidding rate of 1.95%, with a high bid-to-cover ratio of 23.59 [4]. Funding Conditions - The central bank conducted a 1505 billion yuan reverse repurchase operation at a fixed rate of 1.40%, resulting in a net withdrawal of 78 billion yuan for the day [5]. - Shibor rates for short-term products mostly increased, with the overnight rate rising by 2.4 basis points to 1.42% [5]. Institutional Views - Huatai Fixed Income noted that recent improvements in bond market sentiment were driven by reduced concerns over supply-demand imbalances and increased uncertainty in the stock market [6]. - China International Capital Corporation highlighted that the nominal fixed income fund scale reached a historical high of 2.735 trillion yuan, benefiting from secondary bond fund subscriptions [7]. - CITIC Securities pointed out that global bond markets faced a sell-off due to geopolitical risks but noted a decrease in global panic, reducing the likelihood of a liquidity crisis [7].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - This week (2026.1.19 - 2026.1.23), the yield of the 10 - year Treasury active bond 250016 declined by 1.3bp from 1.843% last Friday to 1.83% this Friday. The bond market returned to a narrow - range oscillation. Considering the "stock - bond seesaw" and the configuration power at the beginning of the year, it is expected that the 10 - year Treasury yield will fluctuate within the range of 1.8% - 1.9% next week, and may approach the lower limit of the range, but lacks the power to break through [1][10][14]. - Overseas, gold has experienced a "perfect storm" this week with a weekly increase of over 8.4%. It is difficult to conclude that the gold price will reach an inflection point until the central bank's gold - buying wave subsides, the Federal Reserve's monetary policy changes, and the strong fiscal spending scenario reverses. The probability of reaching a stationary point depends on the "opportunity cost" in the medium - term [1][18]. - The US labor market is in a mild adjustment stage, with marginal pressure on employment. The inflation shows a mild cooling trend, and the Fed's short - term reason for cutting interest rates is further insufficient. The probability of the Fed cutting interest rates in January is 2.8%, and it may suspend interest rate cuts [1][18][20]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogues 3.1. One - Week Views 3.1.1. Domestic Bond Market - **Weekly Review**: From Monday to Friday, affected by economic data release, LPR announcement, central bank operations, and market sentiment, the yield of the 10 - year Treasury active bond 250016 showed fluctuations, with a cumulative decline of 1.3bp [10][11]. - **Weekly Thinking**: The bond market oscillated narrowly. The "stock - bond seesaw" limited the decline of bond yields, while the configuration power at the beginning of the year drove the interest rate down. The 2025 economic data showed that GDP achieved the annual target, but the structural contradiction of "strong production, weak demand" still existed. The central bank's over - quantity renewal of MLF reduced the probability of a reserve requirement ratio cut before the Spring Festival. It is expected that the 10 - year Treasury yield will fluctuate within 1.8% - 1.9% next week [14][15]. 3.1.2. Overseas Market - **Gold Market**: Gold had a significant weekly increase. It is difficult to determine the inflection point of the gold price until certain conditions change. The probability of reaching a stationary point depends on the "opportunity cost" [18]. - **US Economic Data and Fed Policy**: The US labor market showed marginal pressure, inflation cooled mildly, and the Fed's short - term reason for cutting interest rates was insufficient. The probability of a rate cut in January was 2.8%, and the first rate cut was expected to be postponed to mid - 2026 [18][20]. 3.2. Domestic and Overseas Data Summaries 3.2.1. Liquidity Tracking - **Open Market Operations**: From January 19 to 23, 2026, the total net investment in the open market was 11,295 billion yuan, including reverse repurchase and MLF operations [30]. - **Interest Rate Comparison**: Comparisons of money market interest rates, interest rate corridors, and yields of various bonds were presented, showing the changes in interest rates [35][37][41]. 3.2.2. Domestic and Overseas Macroeconomic Data Tracking - **Commodity Prices**: Steel prices declined, while LME non - ferrous metal futures official prices generally increased. Prices of coal, vegetables, and crude oil also showed different trends [51]. 3.3. One - Week Review of Local Government Bonds 3.3.1. Primary Market Issuance Overview - **Issuance Scale**: A total of 26 local government bonds were issued in the primary market this week, with an issuance amount of 231.57 billion yuan, a repayment amount of 28.41 billion yuan, and a net financing amount of 203.16 billion yuan. The bonds were mainly issued by 5 provinces and cities, and 3 provinces issued special refinancing bonds for replacing hidden debts [64][68][71]. - **Early Redemption**: The total early redemption scale of urban investment bonds this week was 740 million yuan, involving 3 provinces [72]. 3.3.2. Secondary Market Overview - **Trading Volume and Turnover Rate**: The stock of local government bonds was 55.02 trillion yuan, the trading volume was 36.6054 billion yuan, and the turnover rate was 0.67%. The top three provinces with active trading were Zhejiang, Liaoning, and Guangdong, and the top three active terms were 10Y, 30Y, and 20Y [81]. - **Yield Changes**: The yields of local government bonds generally increased this week [83]. 3.3.3. Local Government Bond Issuance Plan for This Month The local government bond issuance plan was presented, but specific content was not detailed in the summary [88]. 3.4. One - Week Review of the Credit Bond Market 3.4.1. Primary Market Issuance Overview - **Total Issuance**: A total of 374 credit bonds were issued in the primary market this week, with a total issuance amount of 331.369 billion yuan, a total repayment amount of 187.874 billion yuan, and a net financing amount of 143.494 billion yuan, an increase of 103.506 billion yuan compared with last week [87]. - **Sub - type Issuance**: Urban investment bonds had a net financing deficit of 2.052 billion yuan, while industrial bonds had a net financing of 16.4014 billion yuan. By bond type, short - term financing bonds had a net financing of 4.2019 billion yuan, medium - term notes had a net financing of 6.3494 billion yuan, enterprise bonds had a net financing deficit of 310 million yuan, corporate bonds had a net financing of 4.9499 billion yuan, and private placement notes had a net financing deficit of 841.8 million yuan [90][94]. 3.4.2. Issuance Interest Rates The actual issuance interest rates of various bond types and their changes were presented [102]. 3.4.3. Secondary Market Transaction Overview The trading volume of credit bonds in the secondary market was 650.547 billion yuan, with different trading volumes for different ratings and bond types [103]. 3.4.4. Yield to Maturity - **Government - backed Bonds**: The yields of state - owned development bonds generally declined this week [104]. - **Credit Bonds**: The yields of short - term financing bonds and medium - term notes declined across the board, the yields of enterprise bonds showed a differentiated trend, and the yields of urban investment bonds declined across the board [104][105][106]. 3.4.5. Credit Spreads - **Short - term Financing Bonds and Medium - term Notes**: The credit spreads generally showed a downward trend [107]. - **Enterprise Bonds**: The credit spreads showed a differentiated trend [108]. - **Urban Investment Bonds**: The credit spreads showed a differentiated trend [110]. 3.4.6. Grade Spreads - **Short - term Financing Bonds and Medium - term Notes**: The grade spreads showed a differentiated trend [113]. - **Enterprise Bonds**: The grade spreads generally widened [115]. - **Urban Investment Bonds**: The grade spreads showed a differentiated trend [118]. 3.4.7. Trading Activity The top five most actively traded bonds of each type were listed, and the industrial sector had the largest weekly trading volume of bonds [125][126]. 3.4.8. Changes in Subject Ratings The subject rating of Qingdao Haifa State - owned Capital Investment and Operation Group Co., Ltd. was raised to A+ with a stable outlook [130].