Overview of Public FOF Funds in Q4 2025 - As of Q4 2025, there are 549 FOF products in the market with a total scale of 244.188 billion yuan, an increase of 26.20% compared to Q3 2025 [1][2] - FOFs are categorized into three types based on the proportion of equity assets: bond-type FOFs (less than 30%), balanced FOFs (30% to 60%), and equity-type FOFs (more than 60%) [3] - The scale of bond-type FOFs reached 161.113 billion yuan, accounting for 65.98% of the total market FOF scale, which has been increasing since Q1 2024 [4] FOF Fund Manager Preferences - The top three actively managed equity funds with the most FOF holdings are: 1. Fuquan Stable Growth A (31 FOFs) 2. Boda Jiuhang C (22 FOFs) 3. Zhongou Dividend Enjoyment A (21 FOFs) [20] - The largest FOF holdings by scale are: 1. Xingquan Business Model Preferred A (4.77 billion yuan) 2. Yifangda Information Industry Selected C (3.65 billion yuan) 3. Yifangda Kerong (3.59 billion yuan) [20] Changes in FOF Fund Manager Allocations - In Q4 2025, the most net increased actively managed equity funds by FOFs are: 1. Yifangda Reform Dividend (4 FOFs) 2. Jingshun Longcheng Stable Return C (3 FOFs) 3. Zhongou Small Cap Growth C (3 FOFs) [33] - The largest net increase in scale for actively managed equity funds is for Jingshun Longcheng Stable Return C (0.66 billion yuan) [34] FOF Stock Investment Situation - By Q4 2025, 168 FOFs directly invested in stocks, with the highest proportion in balanced FOFs, followed by equity-type FOFs [1] - The top three stocks held by FOFs are: 1. Zijin Mining 2. Ningde Times 3. Hanwujing-U [1] Performance of Different Types of FOFs - In Q4 2025, the median returns for different types of FOFs are: - Bond-type FOFs: 0.33% - Balanced FOFs: -0.64% - Equity-type FOFs: -1.21% [13] - The top-performing bond-type FOFs in Q4 2025 are: 1. Tianhong Pension Target 2030 One-Year Holding (2.92%) 2. Ping An Yingyue Stable Return One-Year Holding A (1.81%) 3. Guotai Ruiyue Three-Month Holding (1.80%) [15][16] FOF Configuration by Fund Managers - The top three fund managers with the most FOF configurations in Q4 2025 are: 1. Yang Meng 2. Fan Yan 3. Liu Jianwei [1] - The most configured bond-type fund is Guangfa Pure Bond A, held by 32 FOFs [27]

报告摘要 1、2025 年第四季度市场回顾 2025 年第四季度，市场主要指数中，上证指数和万得全 A 有所上涨，深证成指和创业板指有所下跌。上 证指数上涨 2.22%，万得全 A 指数上涨 0.97%，深证成指下跌 0.01%，创业板指下跌 1.08%。中证转债指 数涨幅为 1.32%。四季度权益市场和转债市场高位震荡，整体涨幅表现弱于三季度。转股溢价率方面，由 9 月 30 日的 44.73%上升至 12 月 31 日的 46.57%。 2、基金持有转债行为分析 点击注册小程序 查看完整报告 特别申明： 本订阅号中所涉及的证券研究信息由光大证券研究所编写，仅面向光大证券专业投资者客户，用作新媒体形势下研究 信息和研究观点的沟通交流。非光大证券专业投资者客户，请勿订阅、接收或使用本订阅号中的任何信息。本订阅号 难以设置访问权限，若给您造成不便，敬请谅解。光大证券研究所不会因关注、收到或阅读本订阅号推送内容而视相 关人员为光大证券的客户。 2025 年第四季度转债基金持有规模最大的是电力设备行业转债，持仓市值达 73.31 亿元；银行、基础化 工、农林牧渔和电子行业转债持仓市值规模分别为 64.99 亿元、4 ...

格隆汇1月28日｜招商策略研报指出，过去一个月市场总体小幅震荡上行，部分涨价资源品、AI景气催 化的TMT板块表现较好。展望2月份，行业配置重点关注景气修复的线索和春季行情的演绎，聚焦顺周 期+科技领域，同时随着春节临近，增加对部分可选消费的关注。结合中观景气、盈利能力、筹码分 布、估值、交易、周期阶段和赛道价值等多个维度，本期推荐关注电子（半导体）、传媒（广告营销、 游戏、影视）、机械（自动化设备、工程机械）、电力设备（电池、电网设备、光伏设备）、基础化 工、社会服务等。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article provides an overview of fund managers' perspectives and data from their Q4 2025 reports, highlighting different investment styles and strategies across various funds [1][2]. Group 1: Investment Styles - Fund managers are categorized into different investment styles, including deep value, growth value, and balanced styles, each with distinct characteristics and strategies [7][26]. - Deep value style focuses on low valuation metrics such as low P/E and P/B ratios, primarily investing in sectors like finance, real estate, and energy [9][10]. - Growth value style emphasizes companies with strong profitability and cash flow, often holding stocks for the long term, with notable managers like Zhang Kun representing this style [15][16]. - Balanced style, represented by Peter Lynch, seeks a combination of growth and valuation, looking for stocks that offer good value [27][28]. Group 2: Fund Manager Insights - Fund managers provided insights on market conditions and future expectations, with some expressing optimism about the recovery of consumer demand and housing prices [19][20]. - Adjustments in fund allocations were noted, with some managers reducing exposure to underperforming sectors while increasing investments in technology and energy-related companies [20][23]. - The overall sentiment indicates a cautious yet optimistic outlook for 2026, with expectations of improved economic conditions and potential investment opportunities in various sectors [41][54]. Group 3: Sector Focus - Specific sectors highlighted include AI, renewable energy, and consumer goods, with managers emphasizing the importance of selecting companies with strong fundamentals and growth potential [52][59]. - The article notes a trend towards increasing allocations in sectors like chemicals and machinery, reflecting a structural adjustment in response to market conditions [21][23]. - Fund managers are also paying attention to the impact of macroeconomic factors, such as inflation and government policies, on investment strategies [41][56].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In Q4 2025, the market showed mixed performance with the Shanghai Composite Index and Wind All - A Index rising, while the Shenzhen Component Index and ChiNext Index falling. The CSI Convertible Bond Index rose by 1.32%. The equity and convertible bond markets fluctuated at high levels with weaker overall gains than in Q3. The conversion premium rate increased from 44.73% on September 30 to 46.57% on December 31 [1][10]. - At the end of Q4 2025, the scale of convertible bonds held by funds decreased, but the proportion of the market value of convertible bonds held by funds to the balance of the convertible bond market increased. Different - type funds had differentiated changes in the scale of convertible bonds held, with mixed - bond - type secondary funds increasing their holdings and passive - index - type bond funds reducing their holdings [2][11]. - Convertible bond funds' scale increased quarter - on - quarter. Their performance was weaker than the CSI Convertible Bond Index and the Wind All - A Index in Q4 2025. The average return rate was 0.86%, and the median return rate was 1.09% [3][40]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 2025 Q4 Market Review - The Shanghai Composite Index rose 2.22%, the Wind All - A Index rose 0.97%, the Shenzhen Component Index fell 0.01%, and the ChiNext Index fell 1.08%. The CSI Convertible Bond Index rose 1.32%. The conversion premium rate increased from 44.73% on September 30 to 46.57% on December 31 [1][10]. 3.2 Fund Holding Convertible Bond Behavior Analysis 3.2.1 Fund Holding Convertible Bond Total Scale Change - By the end of Q4 2025, the balance of the convertible bond market was 552.999 billion yuan, a decrease of 55.551 billion yuan from the end of the previous quarter. The scale of newly issued convertible bonds was 15.035 billion yuan. The scale of convertible bonds held by funds was 308.256 billion yuan, a reduction of 8.362 billion yuan from the end of the previous quarter, a 2.64% quarter - on - quarter decrease. The proportion of the market value of convertible bonds held by funds to the balance of the convertible bond market was 55.74%, a 3.71 - percentage - point increase from the end of Q3 2025 [11]. 3.2.2 Various Funds' Holding Convertible Bond Scale Change - In Q4 2025, mixed - bond - type secondary funds held the largest scale of convertible bonds (110.566 billion yuan), followed by mixed - bond - type primary funds (66.391 billion yuan) and passive - index - type bond funds (60.141 billion yuan). Mixed - bond - type secondary funds increased their holdings by 39.28 billion yuan, and mixed - bond - type primary funds increased by 16.07 billion yuan. Passive - index - type bond funds reduced their holdings by 90.87 billion yuan, and other types of funds also had different changes in holdings [15][19]. 3.2.3 Fund Positioning Behavior Analysis - **Fund Positioning Industry Distribution**: The top five industries with the largest scale of convertible bonds held in Q4 2025 were banking (55.014 billion yuan), power equipment (47.634 billion yuan), basic chemicals (24.739 billion yuan), electronics (24.298 billion yuan), and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery (17.188 billion yuan). Non - ferrous metals had the largest reduction in holdings (4.636 billion yuan), and the electronics industry had a relatively large increase in holdings (2.853 billion yuan) [23][24]. - **Fund Positioning Individual Bond Distribution**: Among the top 5 convertible bonds held by funds, 3 were bank - related (Industrial Bank Convertible Bond, Shanghai Bank Convertible Bond, and Chongqing Bank Convertible Bond). Industrial Bank Convertible Bond had the largest increase in holdings (1.905 billion yuan) [29][30]. - **Fund Holding Convertible Bond Rating**: AA - rated convertible bonds had the highest proportion (30.81%) among those held by funds [33]. 3.3 Convertible Bond Fund Holding Convertible Bond Behavior Analysis 3.3.1 Convertible Bond Fund Scale Change - By the end of Q4 2025, there were 38 existing convertible bond funds, with a holding scale of 51.287 billion yuan, a quarter - on - quarter increase of 2.15 billion yuan [34]. 3.3.2 Convertible Bond Fund Positioning Behavior Analysis - **Convertible Bond Fund Positioning Industry Distribution**: The convertible bond funds held the largest market value of convertible bonds in the power equipment industry (7.331 billion yuan). The banking industry had the largest increase in holdings (659 million yuan), and non - ferrous metals had the largest reduction in holdings (1.553 billion yuan) [35]. - **Convertible Bond Fund Performance**: In Q4 2025, the average return rate of convertible bond funds was 0.86%, the median return rate was 1.09%, and the average return rate of the top - ten convertible bond funds was 2.79%. Their performance was weaker than the CSI Convertible Bond Index and the Wind All - A Index [40].

截至收盘，上证指数收报4151.24点，上涨0.27%；深证成指收报14342.89点，上涨0.09%；创业板指收报3323.56点，下跌0.57%。两市合计成交29654.1亿 元，较上一交易日增加704.29亿元。 1. 两市主力资金净流出超270亿元 今日沪深两市主力资金开盘净流出58.9亿元，尾盘净流出29.34亿元，两市全天主力资金净流出274.87亿元。 | | | 沪深两市最近五个交易日主力资金流向情况（亿元） | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 日期 | | 净流入金额 开盘净流入 | 尾盘净流入 | 超大单净买入 | | 2026- 1-28 | -274. 87 | - 58. 90 | - 29. 34 | - 118. 55 | | 2026- 1- 27 | - 414. 34 | -373. 34 | 41. 39 | - 173. 55 | | 2026- 1-26 | - 757. 10 | -324. 59 | - 15. 61 | - 496. 92 | | 2026- 1-23 | -41.67 | -83. 56 | 58. ...

Market Overview - A-shares showed mixed performance with the Shanghai Composite Index up by 0.27% and the Shenzhen Component Index up by 0.09%, while the ChiNext Index fell by 0.57% [1] - Over 3600 stocks in the three markets closed lower, with significant gains in sectors like non-ferrous metals, oil and gas, and coal, while solar equipment and biopharmaceuticals faced declines [1] Sector Performance - The weakening US dollar and geopolitical risks led to significant gains in precious metals and oil and gas sectors, while semiconductor and real estate sectors also performed well [2] - Resource sectors attracted substantial capital inflows, with non-ferrous metals leading the way, while previously popular sectors like electric equipment and defense faced capital outflows [3][4] Capital Flow Analysis - The top five sectors for capital inflow included non-ferrous metals (net inflow of 343.73 billion), basic chemicals, building materials, coal, and oil and petrochemicals, indicating a strong preference for resource and cyclical industries [4] - Conversely, the sectors experiencing the most capital outflow were electric equipment, defense, pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, and automotive [4] Stock Performance - The top five stocks for capital inflow were dominated by non-ferrous metals and technology, with China Aluminum and Tongling Nonferrous Metals seeing significant gains [5] - Major outflows were observed in consumer and financial stocks, with Kweichow Moutai experiencing a net outflow exceeding 31 billion [5] Market Dynamics - On January 28, 85 stocks hit the daily limit up, with non-ferrous metals accounting for 41% of these, indicating a strong sector concentration driven by resource and policy factors [6][7] - The market showed a high level of event-driven trading, with significant interest in non-ferrous metals due to global supply chain restructuring and domestic policy support [6][7] Precious Metals Insights - International gold prices surged, reaching a historical high of 5300 USD/oz, with the precious metals index rising by 6.76% [9] - The increase in gold prices was attributed to a significant decline in the US dollar index, which fell to 95.77, the lowest since February 2022, making gold more attractive as a non-dollar asset [10][11] Geopolitical and Economic Factors - Geopolitical tensions and concerns over the US dollar's credibility have driven investors towards gold as a safe-haven asset, reflecting heightened global risk aversion [11] - Central banks' continued purchases of gold and expectations of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve have further boosted demand for gold ETFs and institutional allocations [12] Domestic Market Trends - Domestic gold prices also rose, with mainstream gold jewelry brands exceeding 1600 CNY/g, driven by strong market demand [13] - The oil sector's rise was primarily due to geopolitical supply disruptions, reflecting a systemic response to both geopolitical risks and a weakening dollar [13]

Core Viewpoint - The trading volume of the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Connect reached a total of 375.77 billion, with Zijin Mining and CATL leading in individual stock trading volume [1][3] Group 1: Trading Volume and Key Stocks - The total trading amount for the Shanghai Stock Connect was 185.69 billion, while the Shenzhen Stock Connect totaled 190.08 billion [1] - Zijin Mining ranked first in the Shanghai Stock Connect, while CATL topped the Shenzhen Stock Connect [2][3] Group 2: Sector Performance - The non-ferrous metals sector saw the highest net inflow of main funds, amounting to 97.43 billion, with a net inflow rate of 2.92% [4][6] - Other sectors with significant inflows included industrial metals and communications, while the new energy and pharmaceutical sectors experienced notable outflows [4][6] Group 3: ETF Trading - The CSI 500 ETF from Huaxia (512500) saw a remarkable trading volume increase of 1188% compared to the previous trading day, leading the growth in ETF trading [9] - The top ETF by trading volume was the CSI 300 ETF from Huatai Baichuan (510300), with a trading amount of 401 billion [9] Group 4: Institutional Activity - Institutional buying was notable in stocks like Hongjing Technology, which saw a 7.04% increase and received 1.45 billion from three institutions [10] - Conversely, AI application stock Sanwei Communication faced selling pressure, with two institutions selling 1.18 billion [10]

今日各行业资金流向 | 行业 | 日涨跌幅（%） | 资金流向（亿元） | 行业 | 日涨跌幅（%） | 资金流向（亿元） | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 有色金属 | 5.92 | 106.92 | 社会服务 | -0.94 | -4.75 | | 通信 | 0.86 | 32.52 | 商贸零售 | -0.29 | -6.27 | | 建筑材料 | 2.18 | 17.21 | 非银金融 | -0.23 | -7.26 | | 基础化工 | 1.44 | 16.04 | 食品饮料 | -0.68 | -10.45 | | 银行 | -0.62 | 14.90 | 家用电器 | -1.47 | -19.16 | | 石油石化 | 3.54 | 13.74 | 建筑装饰 | -0.22 | -22.89 | | 煤炭 | 3.42 | 12.12 | 公用事业 | -0.39 | -23.69 | | 钢铁 | 2.16 | 8.87 | 计算机 | -1.02 | -31.71 | | 纺织服饰 | 1.46 | 7.85 | 传媒 | -1.77 | - ...

Group 1 - Elon Musk predicts a countdown of 2000 days for the old world, emphasizing the urgency of energy supply for AI and technology advancements [1] - The U.S. faces a 30% shortfall in transformers, leading to a 127-week wait for procurement, highlighting the critical supply chain issues in the energy sector [3][5] - The price of transformers in China has surged to 205,000 yuan each, indicating a significant increase in demand and supply constraints [5] Group 2 - China's electricity consumption reached 10.4 trillion kilowatt-hours, more than double that of the U.S., signaling a shift towards data-driven industries [8][10] - Over 35% of China's electricity comes from renewable sources, showcasing the country's advancements in clean energy infrastructure [10] - The U.S. struggles with outdated transformer technology and a lack of skilled labor, with only 10% of manufacturing capacity remaining domestically [14][16] Group 3 - The delay in tariff exemptions for Chinese transformers reflects a compromise by U.S. policymakers, acknowledging the necessity of imports for AI data centers [16] - The competition is shifting from chip technology to energy supply, with China establishing a robust energy infrastructure that supports its technological ambitions [20] - The current energy crisis emphasizes the importance of stable and affordable electricity for AI development, challenging the notion that advanced technology alone can drive progress [18]