红星资本局8月8日消息，知名量化私募上海靖奇投资管理有限公司（下称"靖奇投资"）高层内斗有了新进展。 8月7日下午，靖奇投资微信公众号发布了《关于非法使用法人印章及合作机构尽职调查义务的声明》（下称"《声明》"）。在《声明》中，靖奇投资称，公 司发现存在人员未经法定代表人范思奇授权，非法使用伪造法人印章及冒用法人签名，擅自进行基金设立、清盘、证券账户开立等关键法律行为的情形。 对此，8月8日，靖奇投资另一名创始人唐靖人回应红星资本局称，这篇《声明》是范思奇所发，涉及公章、工商变更登记等一系列纠纷，目前他们已经诉诸 司法解决，还在等待后续结果。 红星资本局注意到，8月7日的这份《声明》落款为靖奇投资与法定代表人范思奇，并盖有公章和法定代表人章。 红星资本局注意到，目前双方各执一词，尚未有定论。今年6月，该私募就因创始人范思奇宣布"旗下产品清盘""发文称遭背刺"等话题引发关注。 事涉公章、股权转让、删库跑路 两名创始人各执一词 《声明》称，近期，公司发现存在人员未经法定代表人范思奇授权，非法使用伪造法人印章及冒用法人签名，擅自进行基金设立、清盘、证券账户开立等关 键法律行为的情形。此类操作如未经有效授权，相关法律 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a governance crisis at Shanghai Jingqi Investment Management Co., Ltd. (Jingqi Investment), highlighting internal conflicts and allegations of unauthorized actions involving the use of forged legal seals and signatures, which have implications for its custodian, China Merchants Securities [2][5][10]. Group 1: Company Background - Jingqi Investment was established in 2015, managing assets between 1 billion to 2 billion yuan [4]. - The company has two founders: Fan Siqi, who holds a 36.36% stake, and Tang Jingren, who holds a 27.27% stake [4]. - Fan Siqi serves multiple roles including legal representative, chairman, and fund manager, while Tang Jingren is the risk control officer [4]. Group 2: Recent Developments - On June 10, 2025, Fan Siqi announced his resignation as fund manager, citing significant pressure and loss of enthusiasm due to management responsibilities [5]. - Following his resignation, Jingqi Investment stated that the funds managed by Fan Siqi were a small portion of the total assets under management and that all other products were operating normally [5]. - On July 2, 2025, Jingqi Investment reported a large abnormal transfer from its main account, leading to the freezing of online operations [7]. Group 3: Allegations and Complaints - The risk warning issued on August 7, 2025, indicated unauthorized actions by personnel, including the illegal use of forged seals, and accused China Merchants Securities of failing to fulfill its basic verification obligations [2][10]. - Fan Siqi claimed that there were instances where company funds were used for personal expenses by a shareholder, raising concerns about financial management [10]. - The article also mentions ongoing investigations into potential commission kickbacks involving brokerage firms, which are prohibited by regulatory authorities [10][12].

Core Viewpoint - The article reveals details about the "rebate incident" involving Li Cheng, the market director of Huanfang Quantitative, and the brokerage firm China Merchants Securities, highlighting the intricate relationships and interests between quantitative private equity firms and their cooperating brokerages [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - The key figure in the rebate incident is Meng Pengfei, who served as the general manager of the Shenzhen Nand East Road branch of China Merchants Securities from June 2018 to February 2023 [1]. - During his tenure, Meng arranged for his relatives to act as exclusive brokers for Huanfang Quantitative, receiving a total of 1.18 billion yuan in performance bonuses, with over 200 million yuan going to Li Cheng and 100 million yuan to Liu Huan [1]. - Meng attempted to secure his position by offering 3 million yuan in gold to his superior, Gao Xiang, who later returned the gold and was investigated in March of this year [1]. Group 2: Huanfang Quantitative's Growth - Huanfang Quantitative's management scale grew significantly, reaching approximately 30 billion yuan by the end of 2017, doubling in 2018, and surpassing 100 billion yuan in 2019, eventually becoming the first quantitative private equity firm in China to exceed 1 trillion yuan in 2021 [2]. - The timing of Huanfang Quantitative's trading activities at China Merchants Securities coincided with its rising industry profile and impending growth [2]. Group 3: Trading Volume and Rankings - From 2017 to 2023, the trading volume at the Shenzhen Nand East Road branch of China Merchants Securities increased dramatically, with trading volumes of 1,819.72 billion yuan in 2019, 9,013.5 billion yuan in 2020, and 10,687.84 billion yuan in 2021, leading to significant improvements in its ranking among all brokerage branches [2]. - Despite a decline in trading volume in 2022 and 2023, the branch maintained high trading volumes of 5,631.09 billion yuan and 7,130.64 billion yuan, ranking 18th and 8th respectively [3]. Group 4: Industry Trends and Competition - The quantitative private equity industry in China has rapidly developed, with an estimated total scale of approximately 837 billion yuan by the end of 2024, including around 768 billion yuan in stock holdings [5]. - As of July 25 this year, there are 44 quantitative private equity firms in China with assets exceeding 10 billion yuan, indicating a competitive landscape among brokerages to attract these influential firms [6]. Group 5: Broker-Private Equity Relationships - The collaboration between private equity firms and brokerages typically involves brokerage services, distribution, custody services, and other financial services, with brokerages earning commissions from these activities [7]. - The choice of brokerage by leading quantitative private equity firms often depends on the performance of trading systems and fee structures, with a typical trading fee around 0.12% [7]. - Relationships and personal connections play a significant role in these collaborations, which can lead to potential issues when large financial interests are involved [7]. Group 6: Custody and Regulatory Aspects - Huanfang Quantitative has a high percentage of its products (58.06%) under the custody of China Merchants Securities, indicating a deep partnership [8][9]. - Legal experts highlight that while private equity firms may negotiate commissions with brokerages, any undisclosed or improper financial arrangements could lead to regulatory scrutiny and penalties [11][13].

Core Viewpoint - The internal conflict at Jiangqi Investment has escalated, with allegations of unauthorized use of the company's legal seal and signature, leading to potential legal implications and scrutiny of the custodian, China Merchants Securities [2][3][6]. Group 1: Company Statements and Allegations - Jiangqi Investment issued a statement claiming that unauthorized personnel used a forged legal seal and signature to conduct key legal actions such as fund establishment and account opening without proper authorization from the legal representative [3][6]. - The company emphasized that any documents created using the unauthorized seal are invalid and that the legal seal is now under the control of the legal representative, Fan Siqi [3][6]. - Jiangqi Investment has formally requested the return of the seal and has reported the matter to the police [3]. Group 2: Custodian's Role and Responsibilities - The statement specifically names China Merchants Securities, accusing it of failing to perform due diligence in the establishment and operation of the "Jiangqi Tiangong Jupei Exclusive No. 1 Private Securities Investment Fund" [6][9]. - The fund was established on July 7, 2025, shortly after Fan Siqi was removed from the company, raising questions about the legitimacy of the fund's operations [10][11]. - A source indicated that China Merchants Securities acted based on previous contracts and documentation, without any request for changes to the legal seal following internal changes at Jiangqi Investment [10][12]. Group 3: Shareholder Dynamics and Internal Conflict - Jiangqi Investment was founded in March 2015 and currently manages assets between 1 billion to 2 billion RMB [7]. - The ownership structure shows that Fan Siqi holds 36.36% of the shares, while Tang Jingren and Mao Noping each hold 27.27%, leading to a lack of absolute control by any single shareholder [7]. - Fan Siqi publicly expressed his grievances about being ousted from the company in a shareholder meeting that he claims was poorly communicated [7][8].

Core Viewpoint - The internal conflict within Jingqi Investment has escalated, leading to allegations of unauthorized use of the company's legal seal and signature, as well as accusations against the custodian broker, China Merchants Securities, for failing to fulfill its due diligence obligations [1][2][5]. Group 1: Company Internal Conflict - Jingqi Investment issued a statement on August 7, 2025, claiming that unauthorized personnel used a forged legal seal and signature without the authorization of the legal representative, Fan Siqi [2][4]. - The company emphasized that any documents created using the unauthorized seal are not recognized and that they do not bear any legal consequences [2][4]. - Fan Siqi, the largest shareholder, was reportedly ousted from the company in a meeting with only nine minutes' notice, which he described as a "backstab" [7]. Group 2: Allegations Against Custodian - The statement specifically named China Merchants Securities, alleging that it failed to conduct basic verification duties during the establishment and operation of the Jingqi Tiangong Jupei Exclusive No. 1 Private Securities Investment Fund [5][8]. - Jingqi Investment has a total of 58 products under management, with three of them being managed by China Merchants Securities [8][11]. - The fund in question was established on July 7, 2025, shortly after Fan Siqi's removal, raising concerns about the legitimacy of its operations [8]. Group 3: Company Structure and Ownership - Jingqi Investment was founded in March 2015 and currently manages assets between 1 billion and 2 billion yuan [5]. - The ownership structure shows Fan Siqi holding 36.36% of the shares, while Tang Jingren and Mao Noping each hold 27.27%, totaling 54.54% among the three [5]. - After ownership penetration, Fan Siqi's effective shareholding is 42.73%, which does not grant him absolute control [5].

Core Viewpoint - The internal conflict at Shanghai Jingqi Investment Management Co., Ltd. has escalated between founder Fan Siqi and co-founder Tang Jingren, leading to allegations of financial misconduct and unauthorized actions regarding company assets [3][4]. Group 1: Company Conflict - Fan Siqi accused Tang Jingren of transferring 5 million yuan from the company's account, leaving only over 2,000 yuan remaining [3][5]. - Fan Siqi claimed that unauthorized actions, including fund establishment and account operations, were conducted without his consent, constituting serious violations [4][6]. - The dispute has been characterized by accusations of using forged seals and signatures, with Fan Siqi asserting that all actions taken without his authorization are invalid [4][6]. Group 2: Financial Mismanagement Allegations - On July 2, the company’s account was reportedly drained of 5 million yuan, with unusual early salary payments made to employees, raising questions about the legitimacy of these transactions [5][6]. - Tang Jingren defended the actions taken by stating that they were necessary to prevent potential financial risks posed by Fan Siqi's actions, including the reissuance of company seals [6]. - The company announced that online transactions had been frozen, but offline transactions could still proceed under specific conditions [6].

Core Viewpoint - Recent announcements from Jingqi Investment highlight serious internal issues, including unauthorized use of corporate seals and significant fund transfers, indicating potential governance failures and internal conflicts within the company [1][3][11]. Group 1: Unauthorized Actions - Jingqi Investment reported that individuals acted without the authorization of the legal representative, Fan Siqi, using forged corporate seals and signatures for critical legal actions such as fund establishment and account opening [1][3]. - The company has formally complained to the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the Asset Management Association of China regarding these unauthorized actions and the failure of the custodian, China Merchants Securities, to perform due diligence [1][3]. Group 2: Financial Irregularities - On July 2, a significant abnormal transfer of funds occurred from the company's main account, with 5 million yuan being transferred out within hours, leaving only 2,600 yuan in the account [2][11]. - The transfers included payments for a "year-end bonus" to a shareholder and fees to an unrelated account for "information technology services," raising concerns about the legitimacy of these transactions [11]. Group 3: Internal Conflicts - The situation reflects an escalation of internal power struggles within Jingqi Investment, with the founder, Fan Siqi, previously losing access to critical operational controls during a hastily convened shareholder meeting [11]. - Following these events, Fan Siqi announced his resignation as fund manager due to stress, while the company attempted to clarify his status and the implications of the fund's management [11]. Group 4: Company Background - Jingqi Investment, established in 2015, focuses on quantitative investment using data mining and modeling techniques, and became a member of the Asset Management Association of China in 2018 [12]. - The company currently has 58 products, with only three under the custody of China Merchants Securities, which has stated that it found no evidence of wrongdoing in its internal review [12].

Core Insights - The A-share market has shown a trend of steady upward movement this year, with multiple sectors experiencing gains and market confidence gradually recovering [1][2] - Quantitative private equity funds have significantly outperformed subjective private equity funds, with an average return of 18.92% for 36 billion quantitative private equity funds by the end of July [1][2][3] - The number of billion quantitative private equity funds is increasing, with 44 out of 90 billion private equity funds being quantitative, representing nearly 49% of the total [2] Performance Comparison - Among the 42 billion private equity funds with returns exceeding 10%, 32 are quantitative, 9 are subjective, and 1 is mixed [2] - The average return for 16 billion subjective private equity funds is 13.59%, with 93.75% achieving positive returns [3] Reasons for Quantitative Strength - The high volatility of small and medium-cap stocks allows quantitative strategies to capture trading errors effectively [4] - The overall market liquidity is robust, with daily trading volumes consistently above 1 trillion, and significant net inflows from individual investors since October of last year [4] - There are numerous opportunities related to thematic concepts, particularly around artificial intelligence, which are concentrated in small and medium-cap stocks [4] Market Trust in Quantitative Strategies - The effectiveness of quantitative strategies has been recognized, especially in volatile markets, leading to increased allocation from institutional and high-net-worth clients [6] - Improved market liquidity and the growing number of quantitative professionals are strengthening the foundation of the industry [6] - The upward trend in the proportion of quantitative trading is expected to continue, driven by technological advancements and the increasing demand for risk control and stable returns [6]

在经历4月上旬的减仓后，股票私募机构对当前市场逐渐形成共识，仓位指数在75%上方逐渐稳定 下来。值得注意的是，百亿级私募仓位指数连续两周上涨，并且时隔五周后再次突破80%大关。此外， 私募机构也在通过定增等方式，积极参与A股市场投资。展望后市，机构普遍认为，中国资产重估叙事 逻辑在继续加强，以科技创新突破为代表的新经济领域已经展现出蓬勃生机。 百亿级私募积极加仓 排排网最新数据显示，股票私募最新仓位指数稳定在75.16%，连续六周坚守在75%上方。在经历4 月上旬的减仓后，私募机构对当前市场逐渐形成共识，"按兵不动"成为主流策略。 从股票私募仓位分布来看，数据显示，56.18%的股票私募处于满仓水平，24.10%的股票私募处于 中等仓位水平，12.64%的股票私募处于低仓位水平，另有7.08%的股票私募处于空仓水平。 不同规模股票私募仓位差异较大，仓位由高到底依次是百亿级私募、50亿-100亿元级、0-5亿元 级、5亿-10亿元级、10亿-20亿元级和20亿-50亿元级私募。其中，百亿级私募带头冲锋，仓位指数连续 两周上涨，并且时隔五周后再次突破80%大关，较两周前增加4.09个百分点。 从百亿级私募仓位分布 ...

量化私募之间的竞争，正从业绩比拼向综合实力较量转变。 上海证券报记者采访获悉，知名量化私募上海靖奇投资管理有限公司（简称"靖奇投资"）法定代表人、 基金经理范思奇将于6月卸任靖奇投资基金经理职务，该私募表示将妥善安排股权变更事宜。 无独有偶，不久前，百亿级量化私募——佳期投资的实际控制人也发生变更，公司创始人季强不再是实 控人，原投资总监吴霄霄成为新的实控人。在业内人士看来，随着量化私募的快速发展，管理规模增长 对各家私募的掌门人提出了更高要求，有些创始人选择不断提升管理能力，有些则"让更合适的人统筹 公司"。 量化行业频现核心人员变更 除了靖奇投资，今年以来多家量化私募出现核心岗位的人员变动。 中基协备案信息显示，佳期投资的实际控制人近日由季强变更为吴霄霄。 平方和投资高管团队也发生变化。记者采访获悉，国际知名量化巨头世坤投资原高级执行研究总监兼中 国区副总经理方壮熙，今年加盟平方和投资。 "方壮熙加入后，一方面公司在投研上实现了重要进阶，另一方面，我可以留出更多精力来加强公司治 理。以前的我是总经理+投资总监，现在我是总经理，方壮熙是投资总监，相信未来不管是在策略迭代 上还是公司治理上，我们都会更加从容。 ...