Group 1 - The U.S. government has raised steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%, applying pressure on multiple countries to submit trade negotiation proposals by a specified deadline, which has sparked widespread controversy and concern internationally [1][3] - The current actual tariff level in the U.S. is the highest since 1938, and if the "reciprocal tariffs" are fully implemented, it will reach the highest level since the 1890s, directly impacting the stability of the global trade system [1][3] - The OECD has downgraded U.S. economic growth forecasts for 2025 from 2.2% to 1.6% and for 2026 to 1.5%, indicating significant negative repercussions on the U.S. economy due to the tariff policies [3][6] Group 2 - Vietnam has been specifically targeted by the U.S. to reduce its reliance on Chinese materials and components, which poses a significant threat to its economy as a large portion of its manufacturing relies on Chinese imports [3][4] - The structural dependency of Vietnam on Chinese intermediate products means that the costs of decoupling will far exceed the benefits gained from tariff reductions, complicating the trade relationship [4][6] - The increase in tariffs has led to rising costs in various sectors, including automotive and construction, with reports indicating an 8%-12% increase in metal packaging food prices in U.S. supermarkets [6][9] Group 3 - The U.S. tariff policy is causing a global chain reaction, with the EU and Japan considering countermeasures, and the uncertainty in international trade rules is leading to a decline in global investment and trade volumes [6][7] - Developing countries, particularly those reliant on steel and aluminum imports, are facing increased cost pressures, while African agricultural nations are losing market share due to increased U.S. agricultural exports [6][9] - The international community is showing a clear trend of division, with many countries refusing to take sides in the U.S.-China conflict, and multilateral cooperation mechanisms are gaining importance as a counter to unilateralism [7][9] Group 4 - China is positioning itself as a responsible global player, with significant increases in investment in ASEAN countries and cross-border e-commerce with Vietnam, indicating resilience in supply chains despite external pressures [9] - The U.S. tariff strategy is seen as an attempt to restructure the global economic order, but data suggests that this approach is leading to a "lose-lose" situation for all parties involved [9] - The future of the global economy hinges on whether unilateralism will undermine globalization or if cooperation can be fostered to create a more resilient governance system [9]

Energy - Abu Dhabi National Oil Company has revised its August Murban crude oil export forecast down from 1.77 million barrels per day to 1.705 million barrels per day [2] - The U.S. has proposed allowing Iran to conduct low-level uranium enrichment activities, while Iranian officials describe the U.S. nuclear agreement proposal as "incoherent and disconnected" [2] - The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating India's Adani Group for allegedly importing Iranian liquefied petroleum gas, which the group denies [3] Metals and Mining - Goldman Sachs has raised its aluminum price forecast for the second half of 2025 to $2,280 per ton [3] - Gold prices are nearing historical highs, with experts suggesting a significant possibility of surpassing $3,500 per ounce [3] Trade and Agriculture - Vietnamese companies are set to sign a memorandum of understanding to purchase $2 billion worth of U.S. agricultural products [3] - EU trade officials are scheduled to meet, with the EU reiterating warnings regarding retaliatory tariffs [3] - The India-EU free trade agreement is progressing, with nearly half of the topics reaching consensus, and an agreement expected within the year [3]

O 0 Address 376 (199 133 11 11 the first 裁定非法 白明表示，按照1977年生效的《国际紧急经济权力法》，美国总统的确有权在紧急状态下对国会的权力"越俎代庖"，但并没有明确总统是否有权决定关税。 按照美国的法律，美国的关税权在国会，但现在特朗普随意解释总统的特殊权力，在很大程度上既有关税政策的制定权，又有关税的执行权，客观上是对美 国"三权分立"体制的否定。 提出上诉 美国媒体分析称，这项裁决是本届特朗普政府遭遇的最大司法挫折之一，相当于全盘否定了特朗普第二任期内关税战的法律基础。有美国贸易律师认为，这 是近几十年来美国总统在贸易政策上遭遇的最大法律挫折，"创造了历史"。法院通常对总统在贸易政策、外交事务等方面的权力给予较大尊重。 此番裁决暂停了特朗普政府对大多数美国进口商品征收的10%普遍关税，以及以打击芬太尼和非法移民为由对中国、墨西哥、加拿大加征的部分关税，但针 对汽车及钢铝行业征收的25%关税不受影响。 据美国媒体报道，美国以往通常援引《国际紧急经济权力法》对他国实施制裁或冻结资产，特朗普是第一个援引该法律来全面加征关税的美国总统。不过， 美国国际贸易法院负责裁 ...

Core Points - The U.S. President has postponed the planned 50% tariffs on EU products from June 1 to July 9 to allow for negotiations [1][2] - The U.S. originally intended to impose a 20% "reciprocal tariff" on EU imports, but has retained a 10% "baseline tariff" [2][4] - The EU has expressed that the U.S. government's aggressive stance is unacceptable and emphasized the need to maintain their position without escalating the dispute [4][12] Group 1 - The U.S. government's recent threats and subsequent postponement reflect the uncertainty in its tariff policy, which is seen as a negotiation tactic [7][9] - Experts warn that imposing high tariffs could lead to an economic recession in the U.S., with potential impacts on GDP and inflation [9][11] - The current tariffs on EU products include a 10% baseline tariff and a 25% tariff on automobiles and steel, which are already significant burdens [11][12] Group 2 - The EU is committed to reaching an agreement with the U.S. before the July 9 deadline [13] - The EU has stated that it will not concede on key issues and is open to cooperation only if the U.S. is willing to negotiate fairly [17]

Core Viewpoint - The recent shift in President Trump's stance on tariffs against the EU indicates a desire to maintain negotiation space and avoid escalating trade tensions, despite ongoing deep-seated economic relationship restructuring between the US and EU [2][3]. Group 1: Tariff Negotiations - Trump initially threatened to impose a 50% tariff on EU imports starting June 1, citing a lack of progress in negotiations [3]. - Following a conversation with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Trump agreed to extend the deadline for imposing tariffs to July 9, suggesting a willingness to continue discussions [3][4]. - The EU's strategy involves a dual approach: proposing conditions for tariff reductions while also demonstrating a strong stance to wait for potential shifts in the US position [4]. Group 2: Economic Impact and Market Reactions - The capital markets reacted positively to the tariff delay, with US stock index futures rising and the euro appreciating against the dollar [5]. - Despite the positive market response, analysts express concerns that the ongoing tariff threats could lead to a prolonged period of uncertainty in US-EU trade relations [5][6]. Group 3: Long-term Implications - The trade dispute reflects a broader trend of distancing between the US and EU, with both sides recognizing that a trade war would be detrimental [8][9]. - Analysts suggest that the traditional "value-based alliance" between the US and EU is evolving into a more loose-knit alliance focused on mutual interests rather than shared values [9].

Group 1: Silver Market Analysis - London silver is currently trading above $33.54, with an opening price of $33.03 per ounce and a current price of $33.48, reflecting a 1.33% increase [1] - The highest price reached today was $33.54, while the lowest was $32.88, indicating a short-term bullish trend in the silver market [1] - The trading range for platinum metal over the past month has been between $31.65 and $33.70, with recent price movements showing uncertainty as it fluctuates around the 20-period exponential moving average [3] Group 2: EU-US Trade Negotiations - EU and US tariff negotiations have resumed but remain fraught with uncertainty, with the EU willing to make concessions on purchasing US natural gas, weapons, and agricultural products, while rejecting US demands to eliminate VAT and weaken digital regulations [2] - The US continues to impose a 25% tariff on EU steel and aluminum products and maintains a 10% baseline tariff on nearly all other goods, threatening additional tariffs on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and other key sectors [2] - The EU has initiated public consultations on a list of nearly €100 billion worth of goods in response to US tariffs and plans to file a complaint with the WTO regarding US tariffs on cars and parts [2]

Group 1 - China has not imported US LNG for nearly two and a half months since imposing a 15% retaliatory tariff in February, with imports dropping from 65,700 tons in February to zero in March compared to 412,500 tons last year [1][3] - The Chinese government is diversifying its natural gas supply channels and is not solely reliant on the US, focusing on increasing domestic production and utilizing cheaper alternatives such as coal and renewable energy [3][5] - The trade tensions have led to Canada imposing high tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and steel products, prompting China to retaliate with tariffs on Canadian agricultural products [5][6] Group 2 - There is a call from various sectors in Canada for a pragmatic cooperation with China, suggesting a need to reassess past policies towards China to improve bilateral relations [7] - The Chinese ambassador to Canada emphasized the strong complementary nature of economic relations between China and Canada, particularly in the energy sector [6][7]

宏 观 研 究 投资要点： 宏 观 定 期 报 告 受第二轮抢出口拉动，4 月出口同比 8.1%，较预期更为强劲；加之中美 拟进行对等经贸会谈，美关税烈度整体趋缓，预计二次抢出口可望贯穿二季度， 下半年出口下行风险犹存。4 月出口（美元计价，下同）同比 8.1%，较春节调 整后的 3 月同比增速回升达 2.4 个百分点，在 4 月特朗普推出"对等关税"之 后又针对部分国家地区实施 90 天缓冲、针对半导体等商品实施豁免，造成出 口企业预期巨大波动的背景下，较我们此前稍显乐观的预期（5.7%）更加强劲， 凸显出新一轮"抢出口"显著的拉动作用。近期我国同意与美方进行对等经贸 会谈，美国内需受到短期刺激效应同时关税烈度整体趋缓，预计我国的二次抢 出口有望贯穿整个二季度。4 月进口同比跌幅较 3 月收窄 4.1 个百分点至-0.2%， 进口反弹带动当月货物贸易顺差小幅收窄至 961.8 亿美元但仍维持高位。美国 发起的本轮关税战进入拉锯阶段，美方试图将我国强大的产业链生产能力从其 供给侧逐步剥离的意图尚未根本性改变，下半年我国出口下行风险犹存。 关税动荡中边际缓和，我国域外协同生产活跃度陡升；人民币汇率指数小 幅走弱 ...

据新民晚报报道，在关税问题上，日美依然没有谈拢。日本首相石破茂日前就日美关税谈判问题表示，两国之间立场存在隔阂，目前尚未找到共识。近日， 石破茂听取了第二轮日美关税谈判汇报。针对美国3日开始对关键汽车零部件加征25%关税一事，石破茂表示"非常遗憾"，并称将继续要求美国重新审视相 关关税措施。身为美国在亚太地区的重要盟友，日本获得了对美关税优先谈判权。然而两轮谈判下来，美国仍旧毫不退让。 日本首相石破茂（资料图） 通过日本与美国的谈判来看，中国不与美国谈判，就已经表明了中国是非常了解美国的。从美国给出的谈判条件来看，根本看不到诚意，这样的谈判怎么可 能有结果！而对于日本来说，无论是汽车还是钢铝，均是其重要的出口，日本的谈判也更多的是在这些方面取得进展，但是美国直接表明不愿意降低相应的 关税，谈不拢也是很正常的！ 日本也是赶上了中国崛起的战略红利。美日贸易谈判的破裂，对美国而言，是一记重创。因为在中美谈判迟迟无法重启的时候，美日贸易谈判就是美国关税 战的头等大事了。中国、欧盟、加拿大，都拒绝屈服了。现在日本也拒绝屈服，再这么拖下去，特朗普的关税战，有全面崩盘的风险。为什么特朗普越来越 着急，反倒主动求和中国？根源 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the ongoing trade tensions between the US and China, highlighting that China has not responded to US negotiation hints, suggesting a potential breakdown in discussions over tariffs [1][3] - Recent statements from China's Ministry of Commerce indicate a possible shift in tone, with the ministry acknowledging that the US has been reaching out for talks, which may signal a willingness to engage under certain conditions [3][5] - The article emphasizes that for any dialogue to be meaningful, the US must demonstrate genuine goodwill by correcting its unilateral tariff measures, as China is firm on its stance of "fighting back if necessary" while keeping the door open for negotiations [5][7] Group 2 - Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has taken a strong stance against US tariffs, indicating that Japan will not compromise its national interests for a quick resolution, reflecting a newfound confidence possibly influenced by China's assertiveness [7][9] - Japan holds a significant amount of US Treasury bonds, which could serve as leverage in trade negotiations, with officials suggesting that these bonds are not merely for supporting the US but could be used strategically [9][10] - The article suggests that both China and Japan, as major holders of US debt, may collaborate to counter US pressure, potentially leading to a more cautious approach from the US in its trade policies [9][10]