基金 2025 年 08 月 01 日 指数基金研究系列之十一： 自由现金流选股策略与风格因子增强 相关研究报告 【平安证券】基金深度报告*指数基金研究系列之十： 自由现金流指数的风格特征与投资价值分析 *20250415 【平安证券】基金深度报告*指数基金研究系列之九： 自由现金流策略的产品应用——基于中美 ETF 市场 的分析*20250408 【平安证券】基金深度报告*量化行业比较系列报告 之一：基于资本开支周期的 PB-ROE 模型在行业比 较运用*20241105 【平安证券】基金深度报告*量化行业比较系列报告 之二：基于资本开支周期的行业比较与轮动策略 *20250611 证券分析师 | 郭子睿 | 投资咨询资格编号 | | --- | --- | | | S1060520070003 | | | GUOZIRUI807@pingan.com.cn | | 任书康 | 投资咨询资格编号 | | | S1060525050001 | | | RENSHUKANG722@pingan.com.cn | | 陈瑶 | 投资咨询资格编号 | | | S1060524120003 | | | CHENYAO ...

Group 1 - In June, the mutual fund market saw a resurgence, with 154 new funds launched, raising nearly 120 billion yuan, setting a record for the first half of the year [1] - Bond funds accounted for nearly half of the total issuance, with 34 new bond funds raising 57.93 billion yuan, representing 48.87% of the total [1] - The issuance of equity funds is expected to be a key focus for public funds in the second half of the year, as innovative products proliferate [1][2] Group 2 - A total of 677 funds were established in the first half of the year, with a total issuance of 526.77 billion yuan, showing growth compared to previous periods [2] - Active equity funds saw significant growth, with 45 new funds launched in June alone, raising close to 29 billion yuan, surpassing the previous five months [2] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission is expected to support the development of more technology innovation indices and public fund products, encouraging long-term investment in tech companies [3] Group 3 - The first half of the year saw 124 active equity funds established, raising a total of 51.62 billion yuan, alongside 403 index funds raising 275.30 billion yuan [3] - Fund companies are likely to focus on index funds, mixed funds, and bond funds in their future strategies, as indicated by recent regulatory decisions [3] - Enhanced index products are anticipated to attract significant capital if they can deliver excess returns compared to mainstream indices [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the competitive landscape of public funds in China, particularly focusing on the introduction of floating fee rate funds and the challenges faced by actively managed equity funds in outperforming benchmarks [1][2][16]. Group 1: Floating Fee Rate Funds - The first batch of 26 floating fee rate funds was quickly approved and reached a fundraising cap of 20 billion within a short period, indicating strong market interest [1]. - The fee structure of these funds is asymmetric, where higher management fees are charged when performance exceeds benchmarks, while lower fees apply when performance lags, aiming to align the interests of fund managers and investors [2][24]. - Despite the innovative fee structure, the average management fee for actively managed equity funds remains at 1.2%, as many investors do not hold funds for more than a year, limiting the potential for higher fees [5][29]. Group 2: Performance Challenges - A significant portion of investors (41%) hold funds for less than a year, which complicates the ability of fund managers to achieve the performance needed to charge higher fees [4][5]. - In the past year, only 24% of actively managed equity funds outperformed their benchmarks by 6 percentage points, highlighting the difficulty in consistently achieving superior returns [7][11]. - Over the past three years, only 259 actively managed equity funds have exceeded benchmark returns by 6%, while 2004 funds have underperformed by 3% or more, indicating a challenging environment for fund managers [11][14]. Group 3: Regulatory Context - The introduction of floating fee rate funds is part of a regulatory push to reduce the risk of significant underperformance relative to benchmarks, rather than merely to increase management fees [16][22]. - The regulatory framework aims to strengthen the binding nature of performance benchmarks and reduce the prevalence of style drift among fund managers, ensuring that funds are more aligned with their stated objectives [21][22]. Group 4: Market Sentiment and Historical Context - The market sentiment towards floating fee rate funds is cautious, as previous attempts to implement similar structures faced challenges and regulatory scrutiny [27][28]. - The article notes that while there is renewed interest in floating fee rate funds, they have not yet reached the marketing heights seen with other fund types, such as the A500 index funds [27][28].