Group 1 - The core viewpoint maintains a tactical asset allocation strategy, with a neutral stance on A-shares, a tactical underweight on US Treasuries, and a tactical overweight on gold [1][2]. - A-shares are expected to perform well due to the easing of policy uncertainties and a downward trend in risk-free interest rates, which enhances market risk appetite [1]. - The US Treasury market faces challenges due to unpredictable policies from the Trump administration, leading to higher yield requirements and a potential upward trend in real interest rates [1][2]. Group 2 - Gold is viewed as a nearly perfect hedge against various risks, especially in the context of geopolitical tensions and potential economic recession or stagflation [2]. - The recent political struggles within the US government and the complex global macro environment contribute to a favorable risk-return profile for gold [2]. - Tactical active asset allocation strategies have been implemented, with domestic and global active asset allocation portfolios showing varying degrees of excess returns [3].

Core Viewpoint - The potential for a depreciation of the US dollar is increasing due to misalignment in monetary policy and obstacles in the dollar's external circulation, suggesting a focus on foreign exchange markets, commodities, and non-US equity investment opportunities [1]. Group 1: Historical Context of Dollar Depreciation - Since 1970, there have been seven significant periods of dollar depreciation, each impacting asset performance differently, with commodities generally benefiting the most [2]. - Key periods include: 1. 1971-1973: Breakdown of the Bretton Woods system led to a dollar credit crisis, benefiting commodities and Asian equities [2]. 2. 1976-1980: Missteps by the Federal Reserve resulted in high inflation, with commodities performing best amid concerns of stagflation [2]. 3. 1985-1987: The Plaza Accord initiated a deliberate dollar depreciation, with industrial metals outperforming precious metals and Japanese equities leading globally [2]. 4. 1989-1992: US economic recession and German reunification led to a weaker dollar, with subdued performance in commodities and equities [2]. 5. 1994-1995: Unexpected rate hikes by the Federal Reserve suppressed economic expectations, benefiting commodities as non-US economies rebounded [2]. 6. 2002-2008: The US faced "twin deficits," leading to a commodities bull market and strong performance in non-US equities [2]. 7. 2017-2018: Recovery in the Eurozone and emerging markets resulted in positive returns for both commodities and equities [2]. Group 2: Drivers of Dollar Weakness - Factors contributing to dollar weakness include relative economic advantages, misaligned monetary policies, and credit risks associated with the dollar [3]. - Economic advantages typically arise during global economic recoveries, prompting capital to flow from the US to faster-growing regions [3]. - Misalignment in monetary policy has historically led to dollar weakness, though such periods are rare [3]. - Credit risks emerge when global investors grow concerned about the dollar's stability, leading to a sell-off and subsequent depreciation [3]. Group 3: Asset Performance During Dollar Weakness - Commodities consistently outperform during periods of dollar weakness, driven by demand for physical assets and reduced investment costs for developed countries [4]. - Non-US equity markets tend to benefit more than US equities, with emerging markets showing greater elasticity in capital inflows [4]. - Historical performance rankings during dollar depreciation periods show that the Hang Seng Index outperformed, followed by the Nikkei 225 and European markets [4]. Group 4: Investment Opportunities - The likelihood of a trend towards dollar depreciation is increasing, with a focus on foreign exchange markets, commodities, and non-US equity investments [5]. - Key investment areas include: 1. Foreign exchange: The Eurozone, Japan, and Canada are expected to see their currencies strengthen due to high net positions in US assets [5]. 2. Commodities: Continued value in gold and potential for other physical assets to gain traction [5]. 3. Equities: Focus on economies with leverage capacity, such as Germany and India, with Hong Kong stocks expected to outperform A-shares due to improved liquidity [5].

Core Viewpoint - The acceleration of special bond issuance in the first five months of 2025 is expected to stabilize the physical workload in infrastructure construction, supported by a positive trend in the construction PMI [1][2]. Group 1: Special Bond Issuance - In the first five months of 2025, the issuance of special bonds reached 1.6336 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 40.7%, indicating a faster issuance pace [2]. - The issuance of special refinancing bonds totaled 1.6291 trillion yuan, with a significant concentration in the first quarter [2]. - The net financing amount of urban investment bonds in the first five months was -224.8 billion yuan, showing a decline compared to the same period in 2024 [2]. Group 2: Construction Industry Performance - The construction PMI stood at 51.0%, indicating continued expansion despite a 0.9 percentage point decrease from the previous month [3]. - The civil engineering activity index rose to 62.3%, reflecting an acceleration in project construction across various regions [3]. - The new orders index for the construction industry increased to 43.3%, while the input price index rose to 48.0%, suggesting a slight improvement in market conditions [3]. Group 3: Export and Price Trends - Exports in the first five months of 2025 reached 1.48 trillion USD, a year-on-year increase of 6%, with May exports at 316.1 billion USD, up 4.8% [4]. - The Producer Price Index (PPI) decreased by 3.3% year-on-year, with building material prices declining, which may help reduce costs in the construction sector [4].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has revised and introduced new regulations and management measures to promote high-quality development in the industry and maintain market order and fairness, which benefits leading futures companies that provide comprehensive services to industrial clients and long-term institutional funds [1][2]. Summary by Sections Regulatory Changes - On June 13, the CSRC released the "Futures Company Classification Evaluation Regulations (Draft for Comments)" and the "Futures Market Program Trading Management Regulations (Trial)" to enhance compliance and risk management capabilities of futures companies while focusing on serving the real economy [2][3]. Key Revisions in Regulations - The main revisions in the regulations emphasize the addition of positive indicators for serving industrial clients and long-term institutional funds, improving the comprehensive evaluation system for business income [3]. - The deduction items have been revised to no longer specify particular violations, instead applying general regulatory measures for penalties, except for cases of risk management failures and margin warnings [3]. - Positive indicators have been optimized to support participation from industrial clients in commodity futures and long-term funds in financial futures, while the income evaluation system has been restructured to differentiate between brokerage income and futures consulting income [3]. Implications for Leading Futures Companies - The new regulations establish a comprehensive income evaluation system that favors leading futures companies with diversified operations [3]. - Leading futures companies are better positioned to provide integrated services, including futures brokerage, risk management, and asset management, to industrial clients and long-term institutional funds, enhancing their competitive advantage in the market [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article suggests that the Hong Kong stock market is expected to continue its bull run in the second half of the year, driven by fundamental recovery and inflows of capital from the mainland, outperforming the A-share market [1][2][3] - The historical context indicates that the current situation of Hong Kong stocks outperforming A-shares is reminiscent of the period from 2012 to 2014, characterized by weak macroeconomic recovery and significant technological transformation [2][3] - The article highlights that AI applications are entering an accelerated phase, with Hong Kong technology companies having a first-mover advantage, which positions them to lead the ongoing bull market [1][3][4] Group 2 - The macroeconomic environment and industry trends today are similar to those from 2012 to 2014, with a weak recovery in the economy and a significant focus on AI applications driving growth [3][4] - The article notes that Hong Kong's technology sector has a higher proportion of software applications compared to A-shares, with 56% of the total market capitalization in software and content sectors, compared to only 24% in A-shares [4] - The competitive edge of Hong Kong technology companies in the AI field is emphasized, suggesting they are well-positioned to benefit from the AI industry boom, with potential for valuation increases due to strong fundamentals and improved capital flows [4]

Group 1: Market Outlook - The overall market outlook remains optimistic despite external uncertainties, with the belief that the upward trend in the Chinese stock market is not yet over [1][2] - Investors' understanding of the economic and international situation is comprehensive, and new technologies and consumer opportunities are emerging, indicating a structural positive shift [1][2] - The reduction in risk-free interest rates has lowered the opportunity cost of investing in stocks, marking a historical turning point for long-term and retail investors [1][3] Group 2: Economic and Investment Trends - Economic expectations are undergoing a positive transformation, which is not a short-term phenomenon, with the stock market's expectations reflecting a range rather than a single point [2] - The focus on supply-side innovation is driving demand creation, with capital expenditure in both new and old economies expected to recover and enter a phase of differentiated growth by 2025 [2][3] Group 3: Currency and Asset Valuation - The stability of the RMB is expected to play a significant role in the revaluation of Chinese assets, as the global economic order is being reshaped and the dollar's credibility is declining [3] - The decline in discount rates is leading to a market environment where emerging technologies are the main focus, with financial sectors and high-dividend stocks benefiting from the lower risk-free rates [3] Group 4: Sector Recommendations - Recommendations include financial and high-dividend sectors such as banks, brokers, and highway operators, which are expected to benefit from the domestic decline in risk-free rates [3] - Emerging technology sectors, particularly in internet, media, innovative pharmaceuticals, and military technology, are highlighted as key growth areas due to intensified competition between China and the US [3] - The cyclical consumption sector is also expected to see a revival, with a focus on domestic supply-demand tightness in cyclical products and new consumption driven by supply [3] Group 5: AI and Market Dynamics - The current macroeconomic environment and industry trends are reminiscent of the 2012-2014 period, where technology drove market performance, particularly in Hong Kong stocks [5][6] - The rapid development of AI applications is expected to accelerate commercialization, with Chinese companies poised to benefit significantly from this trend [6][7] - Hong Kong's tech sector, particularly in software applications, is expected to outperform due to its higher market capitalization in this area compared to A-shares [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of preemptive export orders on future export performance, suggesting that while there may be a decline in export growth, the overall resilience of Chinese manufacturing remains intact due to limited overdraw and significant contributions from incremental demand [1]. Group 1: Export Trends and Tariff Impact - The surge in exports began in November 2024, coinciding with Trump's election victory, leading to a significant increase in exports to the U.S. [2] - In February 2025, a decrease in export activity was noted due to lower-than-expected tariffs on fentanyl, resulting in a notable drop in export growth [2] - By March 2025, renewed expectations of large-scale tariffs led to another wave of preemptive exports [2][3] Group 2: Measurement of Export Overdraw - The analysis of export growth from November 2024 to April 2025 indicates that approximately half of the elevated export growth was due to preemptive orders, while the other half stemmed from genuine incremental orders [4] - A simulation of the scenario post-preemptive orders suggests that while there may be a significant drop in export growth for overdrawn orders, exports to other regions are expected to remain stable [4] Group 3: Future Export Growth Outlook - The overall export growth rate is expected to decline in the second half of the year, but the trend remains stable, with potential impacts from a slowdown in the U.S. economy [5] - The imposition of a 10% tariff by the U.S. could lead to a maximum decline of 2% in the export growth rate, suggesting a baseline export growth rate of around 2.7% for the third quarter [5]

Core Viewpoint - The acceleration of GW and G60 satellite constellations will continuously release demand for ground stations, benefiting not only hardware providers but also satellite control services, indicating a rapid development phase for the industry [1]. Group 1: Industry Overview - The domestic low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation is accelerating, leading to an increase in the prosperity of the ground station industry, which is rated as "overweight" [1]. - The integration of space and ground is a typical feature of 6G communication, with ground stations playing a crucial role in data landing, protocol conversion, and network management [1]. - The construction of 28,000 LEO satellites will create substantial demand for ground stations, making the pace and scale of ground station construction a key indicator of the commercialization process of satellite constellations [1]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - A complete ground network is essential for the commercial success of satellite constellations, as demonstrated by SpaceX's Starlink program, which synchronizes its network construction with hundreds of ground stations [2]. - The launch of the first batch of ground station antenna systems for the G60 constellation in March 2025, with a total value of several hundred million yuan, marks a significant step in China's LEO satellite internet construction [2]. - The emergence of the "Ground Station as a Service" (GSaaS) model is driven by cost pressures and the pursuit of efficiency, allowing third-party companies to invest in and operate ground stations, thus reducing overall industry construction costs [2]. Group 3: Investment Recommendations - Companies that are deeply involved in the early-stage verification and standard-setting of GW and G60 constellations, have secured core orders in bidding, possess integrated delivery capabilities, and are forward-looking in GSaaS operations are expected to benefit significantly from the current industry trends [3]. - These companies are likely to build a "technology + customer" moat, continuously delivering performance amid the upcoming order release trend and benefiting from both industry explosion and structural optimization [3].

风险提示： 1 ）低空经济产业政策不及预期； 2 ）低空经济技术研发进程不及预期； 3 ）低空经济商业 化应用场景落地不及预期。 文章来源 本文摘自：2025年6月12日发布的 沃飞长空与卧龙电驱成立合资公司，产业协同加速——低空经济热点点评 肖群稀 ，资格证书编号： S0880522120001 张 越 ，资格证书编号： S0880522090004 报告导读： 沃飞长空与卧龙电驱成立合资公司，聚焦电推进动力系统开发，低空经济商业 化有望进一步提速，动力系统环节有望受益。 投资建议 ： 动力系统与 eVTOL 整机企业积极合作，有望加速核心技术研发及成果转化，进一步强化低 空产业链协同效应， 产业化进程有望进一步提速。 沃飞长空与卧龙电驱成立合资公司，聚焦电推进动力系统开发 。 2025 年 6 月 11 日，卧龙电驱与沃飞 长空签订合资协议，成立合资公司"浙江龙飞电驱科技有限公司"，合资公司将先重点开发适用于倾转旋翼 eVTOL 的高性能电机及电驱系统，针对该构型在垂直起降阶段的高推力需求、巡航状态的高效能转换痛 点，推出兼具强劲动力与适航级可靠性的核心产品，同时通过技术开发与产业化落地，提供适用于 75 ...

Core Insights - The concentration of short positions in TS contracts is driven by significant entry of arbitrage funds, with expectations that the basis will initially widen slightly before stabilizing [1][3] - The current low interest rate environment, cautious sentiment in the bond market, and high Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are key factors influencing this phenomenon [1] Summary by Sections Historical Context - The concentration of short positions in TS contracts was observed from early 2024 to May 2024, driven by the entry of arbitrage funds and a surge in bullish sentiment [2] - The basis of TS contracts dropped to -0.24 yuan, while IRR peaked at 3.4%, attracting more arbitrage funds [2] Current Market Analysis - As of now, the short position held by CITIC Futures has peaked and is beginning to decline, indicating a potential for the basis to widen slightly before stabilizing [3] - The influx of arbitrage funds has led to a noticeable recovery in the current TS contract basis, although the incremental entry of these funds is expected to be limited [3]