近30家央国企今日披露金额最高达两亿元及以上的回购或增持计划公告 中国石油控股股东拟28亿-56亿 元增持股份 | 公司简称 | 回购或增持 | 公告内容 | | --- | --- | --- | | 徐工机械 | 回购 | 拟回购18亿元-36亿元公司股份 | | 国泰君安 | 回购 | 董事长提议以10亿元-20亿元回购股份 | | 京东方A | 回购 | 拟回购不低于15亿元股份 | | 中远海控 | 回は | 拟以7.42亿元-14.83亿元回购股份 | | 三等业业 | 回购 | 拟以6亿元-10亿元回购股份 | | 国电南瑞 | 回收 | 董事长提议以5亿元-10亿元回购股份 | | 东方证券 | 回购 | 拟以2.5亿元-5亿元回购股份 | | 华工科技 | 回版 | 董事长提议回购3亿元-4亿元股份 | | 中航重机 | 回均 | 董事长提议2亿元-4亿元回购公司股份 | | 国投资本 | 回购 | 拟2亿元-4亿元回购公司股份 | | 天虹股份 | 回购 | 董事长提议回购1.5亿元-2亿元公司股份 | | 深天马A | 回收 | 董事长提议回购1.5亿元一2亿元公司股份 | | 中航高科 ...

● 回购 A 股股份方式：通过上海证券交易所交易系统以集中竞价 交易方式回购 证券代码：601919 证券简称：中远海控 公告编号：2025-020 中远海运控股股份有限公司 关于以集中竞价交易方式回购 A 股股份方案公告暨回购报告书 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或 者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ● 回购 A 股股份数量、金额：拟回购 A 股股份数量总额为 5,000 万股至 1 亿股，依照 A 股回购价格上限人民币 14.83 元/股测算，预计 A 股回购金额为人民币 7.415 亿元~人民币 14.83 亿元，实际使用的回 购金额以后续实施情况为准 ● 回购 A 股股份资金来源：自有资金 ● 回购 A 股股份用途：本次回购的股份将全部注销并减少注册资 本 ● 回购 A 股股份价格：A 股股份回购价格不超过人民币 14.83 元/ 股（含） ● 回购 A 股股份期限：自董事会批准本次回购股份方案之日起至 公司 2024 年年度股东大会结束时。公司预计于 2025 年 5 月 28 日召开 2024 年年度股东大会，如无特殊 ...

中远海控（601919）公告，公司拟以自有资金回购A股股份，回购数量为5000万股至1亿股，预计回购 金额为7.42亿元-14.83亿元，回购价格不超过14.83元/股。本次回购股份将全部用于注销并减少注册资 本，预计回购期限为2025年4月8日至2025年5月28日。若在回购期限内发生资本公积金转增股本、派送 股票红利、股份拆细或缩股等事项，公司将按照相关规定对回购股份数量做相应调整。此次回购旨在维 护公司价值和股东权益，增强投资者信心。 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report - After Trump's re - election, his actions such as claiming sovereignty over Greenland and the Panama Canal, mediating the Russia - Ukraine war, imposing wide - range tariffs, and conducting a 301 investigation on China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries have brought many uncertainties to the shipping industry. This report focuses on the implementation measures of the US 301 ship investigation and its potential impact on the costs of US - bound routes [3]. - The report analyzes three types of fees proposed by USTR, discusses the optimal fee - payment plans for different operators, calculates the cost increase for operators, and suggests potential countermeasures and their impacts [3][4][9][23]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 First - Class Fees: For Chinese Operators - The main affected operator is COSCO Shipping (including its subsidiary Orient Overseas). Considering the average scale of container ships and net tonnage, it is more beneficial for them to choose to pay a maximum fee of $1 million per entry into US ports [7]. - The charging scenario is that when any ship of a Chinese operator enters a US port, it can choose either to pay a maximum fee of $1 million or to pay based on the ship's net tonnage at a maximum rate of $1,000 per net ton [8]. 3.2 Second - Class Fees: For Operators with Chinese - Built Ships - Charging scenario: If an operator's fleet has Chinese - built ships and its operating routes involve US ports, all of its Chinese - built or non - Chinese - built ships will be subject to fees. It is unclear whether Chinese operators need to pay both "as a Chinese operator" and "for holding Chinese - built ships" fees [10]. - There are three charging schemes. Operators can choose the most favorable one. For example, COSCO Shipping (including Orient Overseas) and CMA CGM find Scheme (a) more favorable; Maersk, Hapag - Lloyd, and Mediterranean Shipping choose Scheme (c) currently as they have less than 25% Chinese - built ships in their current fleets; ONE selects Scheme (a) and may switch to Scheme (c) if the proportion of Chinese - built ships drops below 25%; Evergreen, HMM, and Yang Ming choose Scheme (c) as their proportion of Chinese - built ships is low and unlikely to exceed 25% in the future [10][20][22]. 3.3 Third - Class Fees: For Operators Ordering Ships from Chinese Shipyards - Charging scenario: For operators that have ordered ships from Chinese shipyards, their ships will be charged when docking at US ports [26]. - Different operators have different optimal fee - payment schemes and fee levels based on the proportion of ships ordered from Chinese shipyards and the expected delivery proportion in the next 24 months. For example, COSCO Shipping, Orient Overseas, CMA CGM, Hapag - Lloyd, ONE, and Mediterranean Shipping are in the $1 million fee level; HMM and Yang Ming are exempt from fees; Evergreen may be in the exempt or $750,000 fee level depending on the measurement method; Maersk may be in the $750,000 or $1 million fee level depending on the measurement method [27][28]. 3.4 Fee Reduction Scenario - Operators using US - built ships can apply for a refund on a calendar - year basis. Each entry of a US - built ship into a US port allows the operator to get a maximum refund of $1 million. However, due to the extremely low proportion of US - built ships (less than 1%), only a few operators will benefit [35]. 3.5 Operator Cost Calculation and Potential Countermeasures - Cost calculation: HMM and Yang Ming are not affected by the proposed fees. COSCO Shipping (including Orient Overseas) is the most affected, with a theoretical high - value cost of up to $2.69 million per ship per entry into US ports if paying all relevant fees. CMA CGM and ONE need to pay between $1.2 million and $1.54 million. Evergreen, Maersk, Hapag - Lloyd, and Mediterranean Shipping need to pay between $750,000 and $1 million [40][43]. - Potential countermeasures and impacts: Operators can reduce the number of US port calls, which may lead to congestion at large ports and a decline in traffic at small ports; increase transshipment through Canada or Mexico, but need to consider high inland transportation costs and limited facilities; replace small ships with large ones on US - bound routes, but face limitations such as port efficiency and canal passage; transfer Chinese - built ships out of US - bound routes and move non - Chinese - built ships in [44].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - Trump's tariff policy has an impact on market expectations, and investors are advised to focus on Maersk's WEEK17 weekly quotes [1] - The geopolitical situation shows that the US and Iran may conduct direct negotiations, which adds uncertainty to the market [2] - In April, the shipping capacity is relatively abundant, while in May, it is currently relatively scarce. Investors need to pay attention to the possible release of more blank sailings in May [2] - Major shipping companies are trying to raise prices in the second half of April, and CMA has officially announced the May quotation from Tianjin Xingang to Rotterdam, indicating that shipping companies are trying to create a price - increasing atmosphere during the off - peak to peak season transition [3] - With the approach of the peak season, shipping companies are expected to issue price - increase letters every month before July, which may lead to a strong short - term trend of the 06 and 08 forward contracts. However, the height of the peak - season prices should be expected to be lower [4] - In May, the price - holding effect is expected to be better than that in March and April. The 06 and 08 contracts are relatively safe for short - term long positions, but investors need to pay attention to the upward height. Due to the uncertainty of Trump's tariff policy and the predicted pressure on US container imports in the second half of the year, if US - bound ships are redeployed to European routes, it will have a negative impact on European route freight rates. It is recommended to conduct arbitrage operations, such as going long on the 06 contract and short on the 10 contract [5] - The main strategy is that the main contract fluctuates, and the arbitrage strategy is to go long on the 06 contract and short on the 10 contract [7] 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Futures Prices - As of April 8, 2025, the total open interest of all container shipping index European route futures contracts is 81,272.00 lots, and the single - day trading volume is 120,506.00 lots. The closing prices of EC2602, EC2504, EC2506, EC2508, EC2510, and EC2512 contracts are 1441.50, 1517.70, 1885.00, 1980.10, 1388.80, and 1609.80 respectively [5] 3.2 Spot Prices - On April 4, the SCFI (Shanghai - Europe route) price was 1336.00 US dollars/TEU, the SCFI (Shanghai - US West route) price was 2313.00 US dollars/FEU, and the SCFI (Shanghai - US East) price was 3306.00 US dollars/FEU. On April 7, the SCFIS (Shanghai - Europe) was 1422.42 points, and the SCFIS (Shanghai - US West) was 1129.45 points [6] 3.3 Container Ship Capacity Supply - 2025 is still a big year for container ship deliveries. As of March 31, 2025, 23 ships with a capacity of 12,000 - 16,999 TEU were delivered, with a total capacity of 345,000 TEU, and 2 ships with a capacity of over 17,000 TEU were delivered, with a total capacity of 47,000 TEU [6] 3.4 Supply Chain - The geopolitical situation between the US and Iran may affect the shipping market. The shipping capacity in April is relatively high, and in May, it is relatively low. There are currently blank sailings in WEEK15, 18, 19, 20, and 21, and attention should be paid to whether more blank sailings will be released in May [2] 3.5 Demand and European Economy - No specific content directly related to demand and European economy analysis is provided other than the potential impact of the above - mentioned factors on the shipping market.

Core Insights - As of April 7, the total market financing balance reached 1.84 trillion yuan, a decrease of 479.64 billion yuan from the previous trading day, marking a continuous decline for seven consecutive trading days [1] - The financing balance for the Shanghai Stock Exchange was 939.66 billion yuan, down by 191.48 billion yuan, while the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's balance was 899.17 billion yuan, decreasing by 285.57 billion yuan [1] - A total of 799 stocks experienced net financing inflows, with 125 stocks having net inflows exceeding 10 million yuan, and 17 stocks exceeding 50 million yuan [1] Individual Stock Performance - The top net financing inflow was seen in Ningde Times, with a net inflow of 846 million yuan, followed by Yonghui Supermarket and Shaanxi Coal, with net inflows of 191 million yuan and 151 million yuan respectively [1][2] - The average financing balance as a percentage of the circulating market value for stocks with significant net inflows was 2.65%, with Dongwu Securities having the highest ratio at 6.98% [2] Industry Analysis - The industries with the highest concentration of stocks receiving net inflows over 50 million yuan included banking, non-bank financials, and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery, with 5, 3, and 2 stocks respectively [1] - In terms of board distribution, 16 stocks with significant net inflows were from the main board, while only 1 stock was from the ChiNext board [1]

中远海控第一季度净利润达132.23亿元，同比增长72.13%；归母净利润116.89亿元，同比增长73.04%。公司表示，2025年第一季度，全球集装箱货量较 上年同期仍然保持了一定的增长，一季度中国出口集装箱运价综合指数(CCFI)均值也同比实现了提升。 4月7日，中远海控公布2025Q1度业绩预增公告： 对于业绩预增主要原因，中远海控称，2025年第一季度，全球集装箱货量较上年同期仍然保持了一定的增长，一季度中国出口集装箱运价综合指数 (CCFI)均值也同比实现了提升。中远海控2025年企业经营发展取得良好开局。 中远海控2024年净利润同比增长105.78% 3月21日，公司公布的2024业绩显示： | | | | | 单位:元 币种:人民币 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 第一季度 | 第二季度 | 第三季度 | 第四季度 | | | (1-3月份) | (4-6月份) | (7-9月份) | (10-12月份) | | 营业收入 | 48,280,064,086.60 | 52,944,431,329.69 | 73,512,832,649.25 | 5 ...

Group 1: Stock Suspension and Resumption - Beizhi Technology plans to acquire 100% of Suzhou Suike Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., resulting in stock suspension [1] - Taihao Technology intends to issue shares to purchase 27.46% equity of Taihao Military Industry, leading to stock resumption. This acquisition is expected to strengthen the company's industrial layout in the military equipment sector [1] Group 2: Share Buyback - Wanhua Chemical's chairman proposed a share buyback plan ranging from 300 million to 500 million yuan [2] Group 3: Investment Cooperation and Operational Status - Guotai Junan has changed its A-share stock name to Guotai Haitong starting April 11 and has been approved to publicly issue company bonds not exceeding 60 billion yuan to professional investors [3] - Lizhong Group stated that the adjustment of U.S. tariffs will not significantly impact its production and operations [3] - Haoyang Co., Ltd. plans to invest no less than 603 million yuan in the construction of an entertainment equipment industrial base project [4] - Runjian Co., Ltd. is a candidate for the procurement project of comprehensive maintenance for Guangdong Unicom's 5G services, with a total bid scale of 179 million yuan [4] - Samsung Medical's wholly-owned subsidiary, Aix Smart Technology, won a transformer procurement framework project in Hungary, with a total contract amount of 23,840,958.10 euros, approximately 190 million yuan [4] - Nandu Property plans to increase its investment in Hangzhou Yunxiang Robot by 15 million yuan [5] Group 4: Performance Changes - Xiaogoods City reported a net profit of 803 million yuan in Q1, a year-on-year increase of 12.66%, mainly due to a 97 million yuan increase in gross profit from market operations and new businesses [6] - Kidswant expects a Q1 net profit between 29.1471 million and 38.4742 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 150%-230%, driven by store upgrades, supply chain optimization, and AI development [6] - China CNR anticipates a Q1 net profit between 2.822 billion and 3.226 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 180%-220%, due to increased product sales [6] - Yonghe Co., Ltd. expects a Q1 net profit between 91 million and 103 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 144.49% to 176.74%, attributed to strong demand for refrigerants and fluoropolymer materials [6] - Yinglian Co., Ltd. forecasts a Q1 net profit between 7.5 million and 11 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 459.28%-720.28%, due to market expansion and improved gross margins [6] - Limin Co., Ltd. expects to achieve a net profit of 100 million to 120 million yuan in Q1 2025, turning a profit due to rising prices and increased sales of its main products [7] - China Aluminum anticipates a Q1 net profit between 3.4 billion and 3.6 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 53% to 63%, driven by increased production of major products [8] - Shandong Steel expects a total profit of approximately 15.3 million yuan in Q1 2025, with a net profit of around -1.45 million yuan, significantly reducing losses [8] - COSCO Shipping Holdings expects a Q1 net profit of 11.689 billion yuan, an increase of approximately 73.04% year-on-year [8] - Tiande Yu expects a Q1 net profit of 70.5681 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 116.96%, driven by new product and market development [8] - Jinaobo expects a Q1 net profit between 33 million and 40 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 128.18% to 176.59%, due to significant revenue growth in specialized equipment [8]

证券代码：601919 证券简称：中远海控 公告编号：2025-018 中远海运控股股份有限公司 关于 A 股股份回购实施结果暨股份变动的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： | 回购方案首次披露日 | 2024/10/21 | | | --- | --- | --- | | 回购方案实施期限 | 自股东大会批准本次回购股份方案之日起不超过 | | | | 6 个月，且受限于 2023 年年度股东大会、2024 | 年 | | | 第一次 A 股类别股东大会和 2024 年第一次 H | 股类 | | | 别股东大会通过的回购的一般性授权的授权期限 | | | | （即不得超过下列两者最早的日期：公司 2024 | 年 | | | 年度股东大会结束时；或公司任何股东大会及 | H | | | 股、A 股类别股东大会通过特别决议撤销或更改该 | | | | 等回购公司股份的一般性授权之日）。 | | | 预计回购金额 | 10 亿元~20 亿元 | | | 回购价格上限 | 20 元/股 | | ...

Financial Performance - In Q1 2025, the company achieved EBIT of approximately RMB 16.571 billion, an increase of about 66.09% compared to the same period last year[2] - The net profit for Q1 2025 is estimated at approximately RMB 13.223 billion, reflecting a growth of about 72.13% year-over-year[2] - The net profit attributable to shareholders for Q1 2025 is approximately RMB 11.689 billion, up by about 73.04% compared to the previous year[2] - The net profit attributable to shareholders after deducting non-recurring gains and losses for Q1 2025 is estimated at approximately RMB 11.637 billion, an increase of about 73.07% year-over-year[2] - In Q1 2024, the company reported a total profit of approximately RMB 9.159 billion and a net profit of approximately RMB 7.682 billion[3] Growth Drivers - The growth in performance is attributed to an increase in global container cargo volume and a rise in the average China Container Freight Index (CCFI) compared to the previous year[5] Strategic Focus - The company has focused on optimizing its global network layout and marketing strategies to enhance customer service and supply chain resilience[5] - The company emphasizes its commitment to digital intelligence and green low-carbon initiatives to improve core competitiveness[5] Performance Forecast - There are no significant uncertainties affecting the accuracy of the performance forecast[6] - The preliminary data provided is based on initial accounting estimates and will be finalized in the official Q1 2025 report[7]