Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: Value Smart Beta Portfolio - **Model Construction Idea**: The Value Smart Beta Portfolio is constructed based on the goal of achieving high beta elasticity and long-term stable excess returns, focusing on the value style[7] - **Model Construction Process**: - The portfolio includes two variations: the "Value 50 Portfolio" and the "Value Balanced 50 Portfolio" - The "Value 50 Portfolio" is designed to capture the value factor, while the "Value Balanced 50 Portfolio" aims to balance the exposure to the value factor with reduced risk through diversification[7] - **Model Evaluation**: The Value Balanced 50 Portfolio demonstrated superior performance compared to the Value 50 Portfolio, with higher weekly and monthly returns, indicating better risk-adjusted returns[4][8] 2. Model Name: Growth Smart Beta Portfolio - **Model Construction Idea**: The Growth Smart Beta Portfolio is constructed to capture the growth style, targeting high beta elasticity and stable excess returns over the long term[7] - **Model Construction Process**: - The portfolio includes two variations: the "Growth 50 Portfolio" and the "Growth Balanced 50 Portfolio" - The "Growth 50 Portfolio" focuses on growth factor exposure, while the "Growth Balanced 50 Portfolio" balances growth exposure with diversification to reduce risk[7] - **Model Evaluation**: The Growth Balanced 50 Portfolio outperformed the Growth 50 Portfolio in terms of weekly and annual returns, suggesting better performance under the balanced approach[4][8] 3. Model Name: Small-Cap Smart Beta Portfolio - **Model Construction Idea**: The Small-Cap Smart Beta Portfolio is designed to capture the small-cap style, emphasizing high beta elasticity and long-term stable excess returns[7] - **Model Construction Process**: - The portfolio includes two variations: the "Small-Cap 50 Portfolio" and the "Small-Cap Balanced 50 Portfolio" - The "Small-Cap 50 Portfolio" targets small-cap factor exposure, while the "Small-Cap Balanced 50 Portfolio" balances small-cap exposure with diversification to mitigate risk[7] - **Model Evaluation**: The Small-Cap Balanced 50 Portfolio achieved the highest returns among all portfolios, demonstrating the effectiveness of the balanced approach in capturing small-cap factor returns[4][8] --- Model Backtesting Results 1. Value Smart Beta Portfolio - **Value 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Return: 2.19% - Monthly Return: 2.40% - Annual Return: 14.90% - Excess Return (Annual): 9.41% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 2.35%[8] - **Value Balanced 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Return: 3.14% - Monthly Return: 3.64% - Annual Return: 13.62% - Excess Return (Annual): 8.13% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 3.99%[8] 2. Growth Smart Beta Portfolio - **Growth 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Return: 1.67% - Monthly Return: 0.95% - Annual Return: 6.11% - Excess Return (Annual): 2.48% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 3.61%[8] - **Growth Balanced 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Return: 2.16% - Monthly Return: 2.22% - Annual Return: 10.54% - Excess Return (Annual): 6.91% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 6.11%[8] 3. Small-Cap Smart Beta Portfolio - **Small-Cap 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Return: 3.34% - Monthly Return: 4.45% - Annual Return: 41.08% - Excess Return (Annual): 21.26% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 6.23%[8] - **Small-Cap Balanced 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Return: 3.85% - Monthly Return: 4.49% - Annual Return: 31.48% - Excess Return (Annual): 11.66% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 4.56%[8]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent performance of the A-share market, highlighting the strong growth of small and medium-sized stocks, particularly in the growth style, while value stocks have shown weakness. It emphasizes the potential investment opportunities arising from the different performance of various styles and sectors. Group 1: Market Performance - The market continues to rise, closing at a rating of 4.6 stars [1][47] - All market caps, including large, medium, and small stocks, have experienced an increase [2][3] - Growth style stocks, especially those in the ChiNext, have shown significant gains [4][5] Group 2: Investment Opportunities - The divergence in performance among different styles creates good investment opportunities [7] - Despite the index not rising much for certain dividend, value, and consumer stocks, their earnings continue to grow [8] - Some of these stocks are now valued lower than at the beginning of the year [9] Group 3: ChiNext Index Analysis - The ChiNext index was undervalued for a long time in early 2024 [13] - It reached its lowest valuation during the bear market in May last year [14] - The index surged over 60% in two weeks from 1520 points to 2576 points [15] - Currently, the ChiNext index is at 2384 points, which is still below its peak from last October [19] Group 4: Historical Valuation Context - The ChiNext index has previously experienced a bubble, with a peak P/E ratio exceeding 130 during 2014-2015 [22][23] - The current average market cap of the ChiNext has increased, leading to a lower valuation center compared to past bubbles [31][33] - Historical high valuations from 2015-2016 are unlikely to be repeated due to stricter regulations on leverage and changes in market composition [25][28][38] Group 5: Investment Strategy - The article introduces a new investment product, the "Monthly Salary Treasure" combination, with a lowered minimum investment threshold of 200 yuan and a regular investment feature [43][45] - This product aims to meet the cash flow needs of investors, suitable for long-term holding during favorable market conditions [46] Group 6: Market Sentiment and Investor Behavior - Investors often redeem during market rebounds, missing out on further gains, which is likened to a missed opportunity at dawn [51]

Group 1: Core Insights - The report introduces a quantitative model solution for addressing the value-growth style switching issue based on odds and win rates [1][8] - The recent performance shows that the growth style portfolio achieved a return of 2.54%, while the value style portfolio returned 2.24% [1][8] Group 2: Odds - The relative valuation levels of market styles are key factors influencing expected odds, which are negatively correlated [2][14] - The current estimated odds for the growth style is 1.11, while for the value style it is 1.09 [2][14] Group 3: Win Rates - Among seven win rate indicators, four point to growth and three to value, resulting in a current win rate of 53.87% for growth and 46.13% for value [3][16] Group 4: Investment Expectations and Strategy Returns - The investment expectation for the growth style is calculated at 0.14, while for the value style it is -0.04, leading to a recommendation for the growth style [4][18] - Since 2013, the annualized return of the style rotation model based on investment expectations is 27.62%, with a Sharpe ratio of 1.02 [4][19]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the importance of understanding different stock indices, particularly the Shanghai Composite Index and the Shenzhen Composite Index, for making informed investment decisions in the Chinese stock market [5][9]. Group 1: Index Characteristics - The Shanghai Composite Index includes only stocks listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, while the Shenzhen Composite Index includes stocks from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and the ChiNext board [5][9]. - Historically, from 2019 to 2021, the Shenzhen stocks experienced greater price increases compared to Shanghai stocks, indicating a disparity in performance during bull markets [5][6]. - The Shanghai stocks tend to have more value-oriented characteristics, resulting in smaller price fluctuations during both bull and bear markets [6][7]. Group 2: Market Performance - The overall performance of the A-share market is better assessed by looking at both the Shanghai and Shenzhen indices, as they each represent about half of the A-share market [9]. - The CSI All Share Index, which includes all listed companies from both exchanges, saw an approximate 80% increase from 2019 to 2021, reaching over 6000 points at its peak [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article provides an update on the second quarter reports of various fund managers, highlighting their investment styles, strategies, and market outlooks for 2025. Group 1: Fund Manager Perspectives - Fund managers present two main contents in their quarterly reports: a review of past investments and future market outlooks [3][9] - Different fund managers have varying attitudes towards market conditions, influenced by their investment styles [5][6] Group 2: Investment Styles - **Deep Value Style**: Focuses on low valuation metrics such as low P/E and P/B ratios, investing primarily in financials, real estate, and energy sectors. Returns are derived from both earnings growth and valuation recovery [8][9] - **Growth Value Style**: Emphasizes companies with strong profitability and cash flow, often holding stocks for the long term. This style is represented by well-known managers like Zhang Kun [14] - **Balanced Style**: Combines growth potential and valuation, seeking investments that are both good and cheap, often utilizing metrics like PEG [30][31] Group 3: Performance Insights - The performance of deep value funds has varied over the years, with notable periods of outperformance and underperformance [11] - Fund managers express concerns over market volatility and the impact of economic conditions on stock prices, indicating a cautious approach to investment [12][19] Group 4: Sector Allocations - Fund managers are adjusting their portfolios based on market conditions, with a focus on sectors like technology, healthcare, and consumer goods, while being cautious about sectors facing headwinds [17][20][22] - There is a notable interest in AI and innovative sectors, with many managers increasing their allocations to these areas in anticipation of future growth [37][59] Group 5: Economic Outlook - Fund managers maintain a generally optimistic view on the long-term growth potential of the Chinese economy, despite short-term challenges [19][60] - The expectation of a recovery in domestic demand and the potential for significant investment opportunities in emerging sectors are highlighted as key themes for the upcoming quarters [68][69]

Core Viewpoint - Active funds have significantly outperformed the market this year, with a year-to-date return of 13.94% for mixed equity funds, compared to 8.28% for passive index funds and only 3.05% for the CSI 300 index [3]. Group 1: Performance Comparison - As of August 1, the mixed equity fund index has a year-to-date return of 13.94%, which is substantially higher than the passive index fund index at 8.28% and the CSI 300 index at 3.05% [3]. - The performance of various indices shows that the CSI 500 index has a year-to-date return of 8.51%, while the ChiNext index has 8.45% [4]. Group 2: Factors Driving Active Fund Performance - The resurgence of active funds is attributed to multiple factors, including the dominance of growth styles, contributions from Hong Kong stock allocations, and the performance of small-cap strategies [5]. - Growth style has become the leading force in the market, supported by government policies favoring emerging industries, particularly in technology [7][8]. - Active equity funds have increased their allocation to Hong Kong stocks, reaching a historical peak with a market value of 437.9 billion yuan, up 6.5% from the previous quarter [11][12]. Group 3: Small-Cap Strategies - The micro-cap stock index has seen a year-to-date increase of 51%, with the North Stock 50 and CSI 2000 indices also showing significant gains of 36.79% and 20.99%, respectively [15]. Group 4: Historical Performance of Active Funds - Historical data indicates that active funds tend to outperform passive index funds in years of market uptrends, with notable years being 2015, 2017, 2019, 2020, and 2021 [17]. - In contrast, during market downturns, such as in 2016, 2018, 2022, and 2023, active funds have consistently underperformed [18]. - Despite recent underperformance in bear markets, active funds are expected to leverage their advantages in bull markets, potentially leading to long-term outperformance against index funds [20].

在加仓成长类资产的同时，多个投顾组合借道港股基金捕捉港股市场投资机会。7月29日，工银瑞信指数PLUS策 略组合将天弘恒生科技指数C新增到投资组合中。工银瑞信基金投顾指出，"我们本次调仓增加了恒生科技的配 置，作为看好港股和成长风格的进攻品种。" 而嘉实财富权益甄选组合也于近期增加了对成长风格产品的配置。7月21日，该组合增持广发中小盘精选混合C、 招商中证800指数增强A等产品。嘉实投顾团队称，组合在风格均衡基础上，小幅增加相对低位的成长方向，同时 对同风格基金内部做优化，调出管理人有变动的基金。此外，7月底，工银瑞信指数PLUS策略组合加仓工银创新 动力股票、嘉实互融精选股票C等成长风格产品。 【环球网财经综合报道】随着股市回暖，多个基金投顾组合于近期密集调仓，其中成长风格基金受到青睐。 进一步来讲，8月4日，富国满天星追求收益组合展开调整，加仓华夏价值精选混合、富国稳健增长混合A、金鹰 科技创新股票C等基金，同时减持前海开源金银珠宝混合C、宝盈消费主题混合等基金。此次调仓旨在加仓成长风 格产品以增加组合锐度。 再者，7月28日，银华天玑 - 奔跑狮子座组合大幅增持摩根标普港股通低波红利指数A，持仓比例从 ...

Group 1 - The current "anti-involution" theme has a broader industry coverage compared to the supply-side reform from 2015-2018, including sectors like photovoltaic, new energy vehicles, steel, coal, building materials, basic chemicals, and pig farming [22][23][28] - The steel and coal industries are transitioning from passive destocking to active restocking, with steel profitability already improving, while photovoltaic and medical devices show stronger demand for "anti-involution" [27][28] - The report highlights that the photovoltaic and medical device sectors are in an active destocking phase, with high potential for price rebound if successful [27][28] Group 2 - The equity market is experiencing a slight decline in sentiment, with expectations for a high-level fluctuation in August, as the overall financial and industrial sentiment has decreased [31][32] - The 10Y government bond yield is expected to slightly decline to 1.70% in August, influenced by factors such as economic growth and inflation [50][53] - The real estate sector is under increasing demand-side pressure, with the industry pressure index rising slightly to 0.597, indicating a potential worsening of the market situation [69][71] Group 3 - The report recommends focusing on high win-rate and high payout industries, including computer, electric equipment and new energy, non-ferrous metals, agriculture, transportation, and light manufacturing [4] - The "clearing reversal" strategy suggests investing in industries that are at the end of the clearing phase, with rising demand and improved competitive landscape, such as oil and petrochemicals, non-ferrous metals, and utilities [4][88] - The report emphasizes the importance of monitoring the performance of small-cap stocks, which have shown a slight increase in attention compared to large-cap stocks [87][88]

Market Performance - Major A-share indices rose on August 6, with the ChiNext Index and the Sci-Tech Innovation Index showing strong performance, leading to a 0.64% increase in the Double Innovation Leader ETF (588330) [1] - Since June, the growth style has remained active, with the ChiNext Index rising over 20% and reaching a new high for the year by July 29, while the Sci-Tech 50 Index increased nearly 10% during the same period [3] Key Stocks - Semiconductor leader Lanke Technology rose over 6%, while defense industry leader AVIC Chengfei increased nearly 6%. Other notable stocks include Gekewei, Baili Tianheng, and Zhongkong Technology, all rising over 2% [3] - The top ten stocks in the ChiNext and Sci-Tech Innovation indices showed significant gains, with Lanke Technology leading at 6.58% and AVIC Chengfei at 5.99% [3] Market Analysis - Analysts believe that growth stocks are supported by both policy and capital. A significant meeting on July 30 emphasized enhancing the attractiveness and inclusiveness of the domestic capital market [4] - Long-term forecasts suggest that the market in Q4 2025 may outperform Q3, with a clearer trend of fundamental improvement and capital inflow expected by mid-2026 [4] - The focus remains on technology as the main investment theme, with high-growth sectors like innovative drugs and AI gaining attention [4] Investment Opportunities - The Double Innovation Leader ETF (588330) offers a diversified investment in strategic emerging industries, selecting 50 large-cap companies from the ChiNext and Sci-Tech boards [4] - The ETF is positioned as a low-threshold investment tool, allowing investors to participate in the technology sector with a lower entry cost compared to direct investments in individual stocks [4]

Market Overview - The overall market has seen an increase, closing at a rating of 4.7 stars [1] - Large, medium, and small-cap stocks have all risen, with large-cap stocks showing slightly higher gains [2] - Value style indices, including dividend and value-focused indices, have experienced significant increases [3] Bond Market Impact - A recent announcement stated that from August 8, new bond interest will be subject to value-added tax, which reduces future returns on pure bonds [4] - This change has led to increased capital inflow into fixed income plus (固收+) assets, particularly those with a value style in their equity components [5] - The value style has shown a strong performance over the last three trading days [6] Investment Trends - The recent market dynamics indicate a rotation in styles, with value styles performing strongly while growth styles have lagged [8][9] - The performance of fixed income plus products, such as monthly salary treasure and 365 products, has also increased due to these trends [7] Currency and Global Context - The RMB-denominated assets are generally strong, supported by recent weak economic data from the US, which has raised expectations for continued interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve [11][12] - The decline in US dollar interest rates has been beneficial for RMB-denominated assets [13] - Since early July, both A-shares and Hong Kong stocks have outperformed global markets [14] Pension Fund Investment - The article discusses the strategy of regular investment in pension index funds, highlighting a combination of 中证 A500 and 中证 红利 as a balanced approach between growth and value styles [36][37] - Recent performance shows that both index funds have returned to normal low valuations, prompting a pause in further investments until they show signs of recovery [39][40] - The article emphasizes the importance of long-term investment strategies and the potential for future opportunities in undervalued assets [41]