Core Viewpoint - The introduction of a professional institutional investor system in the Sci-Tech Innovation Board aims to enhance the identification of high-quality technology enterprises and improve pricing efficiency in the capital market [1][2][3]. Group 1: Introduction of Professional Institutional Investors - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has released opinions to pilot the introduction of professional institutional investors for companies meeting the fifth listing standard on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [1]. - This initiative is expected to leverage the advantages of market-oriented institutions to accurately identify quality technology companies and guide long-term capital investment [1][2]. - The involvement of professional institutional investors is seen as a key step in supporting technological innovation, with the effectiveness depending on the precise implementation of supporting details and mechanisms [1][5]. Group 2: Mechanism and Benefits - The new system will consider the investment duration, quantity, and proportion of professional institutional investors as references during the registration review for companies applying under the fifth listing standard [2]. - Professional institutional investors are believed to possess unique advantages in identifying high-quality technology enterprises, particularly in assessing the technological attributes and future growth potential of unprofitable companies [2][3]. - The introduction of this mechanism is expected to improve pricing efficiency by reducing information asymmetry and providing a more accurate market valuation of technology companies [3]. Group 3: Comparison with International Practices - Successful practices in mature overseas markets, such as the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, have already implemented similar systems, where professional investors are required for specific industry listings [4]. - Statistics show that companies listed under these rules have experienced significant revenue growth and reduced net losses over three years, indicating the potential benefits of such a system [4]. Group 4: Regulatory Measures and Standards - Regulatory authorities emphasize the need for strict supervision of professional institutional investors to prevent issues like profit transfer and other illegal activities [5]. - The Shanghai Stock Exchange is developing standards for recognizing professional institutional investors, focusing on investment experience, compliance, and independence [5]. - There is a caution against the "herding effect" among institutional investors, which could exacerbate market volatility, highlighting the need for dynamic adjustments in policies based on technological advancements [5]. Group 5: Future Prospects - If the pilot program proves successful, the professional institutional investor system could be expanded to the ChiNext and other markets, further enhancing the internal pricing mechanism and resource allocation effects in the capital market [6].

Group 1 - Hong Kong's international financial center is thriving, with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange leading global IPO activities, completing 35 IPOs and raising nearly 1000 billion HKD by June 23, 2025 [1] - The number of companies waiting for IPO approval in Hong Kong exceeds 160, with over 40 applications submitted in May alone [1] Group 2 - Chinese securities firms play a crucial role in enhancing Hong Kong's status as an international financial center, becoming significant players in the IPO market and driving fundraising to global prominence [2][3] - The IPO market in Hong Kong has shown a notable recovery, with fundraising exceeding the total for the entire year of 2024, aided by Chinese securities firms' deep local resources and understanding of regulatory frameworks [3] Group 3 - Chinese securities firms are increasingly dominating the IPO market, surpassing foreign institutions in the number of projects, as evidenced by the successful listing of Haitian Flavoring and Food Company, which became the second-largest IPO in Hong Kong this year [4] - The involvement of major international investment banks alongside Chinese firms highlights the growing maturity and competitiveness of Chinese securities firms in the local market [4] Group 4 - Chinese securities firms facilitate cross-border capital flow and deepen the connectivity between mainland and Hong Kong capital markets, with a significant increase in trading volume through the Hong Kong Stock Connect [5] - In 2024, the trading amount serviced by Chinese securities firms for the Hong Kong Stock Connect reached 11.2 trillion HKD, a year-on-year increase of 64.9% [5] Group 5 - Chinese securities firms are expanding their presence in Hong Kong, with 35 subsidiaries established by the end of 2024, reflecting their commitment to the market [6] - The establishment of a wholly-owned subsidiary by Western Securities with an investment of 1 billion RMB underscores the confidence of Chinese firms in maintaining financial stability in Hong Kong [6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the forum emphasizes the effective synergy between capital and technology, which is seen as a necessary outcome of deepening capital market reforms [1][6] - Chinese listed companies are recognized as the core engine of China's technological innovation, necessitating the formation of an innovative ecosystem involving enterprises, capital, government, research, supply chains, and media to support this [1][2] - The global technology competition landscape is undergoing reconstruction, with listed companies being the main force in technological innovation, contributing significantly to national R&D efforts [2][3] Group 2 - The importance of governance in achieving environmental and social responsibility goals is highlighted, with a focus on integrating ESG principles into corporate governance [4] - The shift from traditional globalization to a more integrated and clustered industrial model is noted, with China positioned to accelerate manufacturing upgrades and create global industrial clusters [5] - The need for systemic innovation in listed companies is emphasized, requiring a shift from single technological breakthroughs to diversified, multi-factor collaborative innovation [6]

申万宏源研究资深高级研究员 袁宇泽 优化投资者结构、推动各类投资者协调发展是资本市场投资端改革的重要内容。申万宏源研究提出A股投资者结构"五分 法"并对不同类别的投资者持股比例及变化进行年度跟踪分析。通过对投资者结构的分析，我们可以更直观的判断各类投资主 体的行为、对市场投资风格的影响以及未来资本市场投资端改革的重点。近年来，我国持续加大引入中长期资金，以中央汇金 公司为代表的主体在关键时期积极入市投资，在稳定市场预期，增强资本市场内生稳定机制上发挥了重要作用。2024年末以产 业资本、政府持股、专业投资机构、个人大股东和一般个人投资者为代表的五大类投资者A股持股市值占比分别为34.4%、 7.6%、19.2%、6.4%和32.3%，与年初相比，产业资本、政府持股占比有一定的提升，专业投资机构和个人大股东持股占比略 微下降，一般个人投资者持股占比下滑。具体来看，2024年投资者结构呈现以下特征和变化： 一、产业资本和政府持股发挥市场"压舱石"作用 产业资本和政府持股近年来逆周期特征突出。与境外发达市场不同，我国股票市场除个人和机构持股之外，还有大量的产 业资本和政府类主体持股。由于产业资本和政府持股主体的持股 ...

为什么呢？ 因为老美下场，属于最大的利空。 周末老美终于决定下场中东，袭击了伊L的核设施，整个中东的局势似乎越来越严重和危险。 很多人会认为懂王参战，会加剧整个局势的紧张导致冲突升级，甚至有可能导致更大规模的冲 突。 但我认为恰恰相反—— 老美下场，不但不会升级，反而还会让中东的乱局更快结束。 利空出尽之后，双方的牌都打完了，接下来所有的动作，就都是小打小闹。 之所以我会这么去分析，是因为 现在双方的态度，其实都非常克制。 老美象征性地派了飞机搞破坏，但也只是针对性地打击核设施，还是秘密进行之后才公布。 老美现在内部问题很多， 如果现在主动介入进行全面战Z，就意味着大规模的军费支出，这会直 接增加他们的债务。 本来内部的很多问题就是因为债务而起的，这边再来一场战Z，就相当于火上浇油。 以前他们愿意打仗，用外部冲突转移内部矛盾，那是因为债务问题可以控制，现在这个条件显然 不具备了。 而且懂王本身也不喜欢打仗，他选举的时候也一直标榜自己是不打仗的总统，他肯定不愿意主动 砸自己的招牌。 这次袭击行动迅速又克制，其实就已经表明 老美根本不想进行全面战Z，后续大概率也不会派出 地面部队。 以S列也是一样的，虽然叫唤得很 ...

不要浪费每一次的危机 为什么呢？ 最近两年，全球经J都不太平。 又是地缘冲突、又是经J数据低迷。 全球经济似乎已经到了危机的边缘。 但是，巴菲特在今年致股东的信中就告诫过我们： 因为每一次危机之后，都是一次财富转移。 而每一次财富转移，都是 我们每个普通人实现财富进阶的机会。 过去40年，我们经历了两轮的大规模财富转移。 第一次大规模财富转移，是在上世纪90年代。 90年代初期，苏东巨变、苏联解体，我们的经济也因为价格闯关受到了冲击，通胀率一度高达 20%以上。 但就在这一场经J危机之后，我们开启了第一轮的财富转移。 这一次财富转移的源头是 工业化+城市化的浪潮 。 工业化+城市化，带动的是财富、人口以及土地资源逐渐从农村流向城市。 所以在这个阶段，你能看到8亿农民进城、你能看到大量农田和G有土地被转化成了工业用地和城 市住宅用地，导致了土地产权的大调整。 而第一轮的财富转移，主要的方式是 以地生财 。 土地通过30年的房贷，用撬动杠杆的方式撬动了财富循坏。 钱都跑到土地和房子上面流转了，自然会把这一部分资产价格拉上去。 直到今天，国人70%的财富都集中在房子上。 很多人的第一桶金，就是通过房子赚来的。 第二 ...

股指期货日报 1. 市场概述与行情回顾 1.1 当日市场总体表现 今日（20250619），A 股三大指数今日集体回调,截止收盘,沪指 跌 0.79%，收报 3362.11 点；深证成指跌 1.21%，收报 10051.97 点；创业板指跌 1.36%，收报 2026.82 点。沪深两市成交额达到 12506 亿，较昨日放量 596 亿。股指期货方面，四大股指依旧在震 荡区间内运行，截至收盘也集体出现了回调。 成文日期: 20250619 研究品种:股指期1 研究分析师：武吟秋 期货咨询证号 (F03087154&Z0018989) 报告周期: 日度 图 1: IF 主力合约分时走势图 研究热线: 028 6130 3163 邮箱:institute@gjqh.com.cn 投诉热线: 4006821188 请务必阅读文末风险揭示及免责声明 图 2：IF 主力合约日 K 图 | 合约名 | 收盘价 | 涨跌 | 涨幅% | 成交 | 持仓 | 日増仓 | 资金流 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 称 | | | | 量 | 를 | | ...

编者按 在全球经济格局深度重构的时代背景下，科技创新与产业创新的协同融合已成为驱动经济增长的核心动力。中国证监会主席吴清近日在2025陆家嘴论坛上 提出"充分激活多层次资本市场的枢纽效能，推动科技创新和产业创新融合发展。"当前，我国资本市场虽已在服务创新驱动发展战略中显现成效，但与国 际成熟市场相比，在市场化程度、投资者结构、制度弹性等方面仍存提升空间。未来，只有持续深化资本市场改革，构建更具韧性与活力的生态体系，有 针对性地进行金融创新，才能推动科技、资本与产业的良性循环。 推动资本市场与"双创新"同频共振 图片来源：新华社 ■中国经济时报记者 孙兆 中国证监会主席吴清日前表示，推动科技创新和产业创新融合发展，需要更好地发挥资本市场枢纽功能。同时，科技创新、产业创新和资本市场发展相辅 相成、相互成就，促进三者良性循环是当前和今后资本市场改革创新的重要主线，也是资本市场高质量发展的必由之路。 接受中国经济时报记者采访的人士表示，有必要针对性地进行金融创新，发挥好资本市场支持科技创新的枢纽作用。 构建更高效的创新生态 ∨ 吴清表示，在新的形势下，构建以资本市场为枢纽的创新生态、提升创新资本形成效率，对于加快科技 ...

Core Viewpoint - The integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation is essential for driving economic growth in the context of a restructured global economic landscape. The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) emphasizes the need to activate the multi-tiered capital market to support this integration effectively [1][11]. Capital Market Development - China's capital market has shown activity in funding sectors like technology, media, communication, and consumption, but remains cautious in hard technology investments. The key to promoting the integration of technological and industrial innovation lies in ensuring efficient capital circulation across different stages and levels [3][4]. - The current capital market faces challenges such as uneven capital distribution, difficulties in early-stage project financing, long investment cycles, and insufficient exit channels [3][4][5]. Exit Channels and Liquidity - The reliance on IPOs as the primary exit strategy for venture capital institutions is problematic, as other exit methods like mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and S-fund transfers are underdeveloped [4][5]. - The development of S-funds is hindered by issues such as valuation difficulties and a lack of professional participants, which prevents the establishment of an efficient market for capital exits [4][5]. Policy Recommendations - To enhance the financing environment for technology enterprises, it is suggested to diversify exit channels beyond IPOs and M&A, and to encourage the development of equity M&A markets [4][9]. - Government initiatives, such as establishing technology guidance funds, can help direct social capital into key areas while reducing financing costs for enterprises [9][10]. - Tax incentives for long-term investments, such as tax breaks for investors holding shares for over five years, could encourage more stable capital allocation [9][10]. Market Structure and Coordination - Strengthening the coordination among various segments of the capital market is crucial. This includes improving the transfer mechanisms between different market segments to ensure that companies can access appropriate financing at various development stages [5][10]. - The capital market should function as a comprehensive, multi-tiered, and efficient "circulation network" to facilitate the flow of capital into and out of technological innovations [5][10]. Investment Trends and Data - As of June 20, 2025, the cumulative financing scale for high-tech enterprises in China's capital market reached 363.87 billion yuan, with 1,772 strategic emerging industry listed companies having a total market value of 20.80 trillion yuan, accounting for 20.47% of the total A-share market value [7]. - In 2024, A-share listed companies' R&D investment reached 1.88 trillion yuan, representing over 50% of the total social R&D investment, with a patent holding rate exceeding one-third of the national total [8].

Core Viewpoint - The deep integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation has become the core driving force for economic growth in the context of a profound restructuring of the global economic landscape [5][6]. Group 1: Capital Market Development - The chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, Wu Qing, emphasized the need to fully activate the hub function of a multi-level capital market to promote the integration of technological and industrial innovation [5][6]. - China's capital market has made significant progress in supporting the innovation-driven development strategy, but there is still room for improvement in marketization, investor structure, and institutional flexibility compared to mature international markets [6][7]. - The multi-level capital market system in China has been continuously improved, expanding its service coverage for technology innovation enterprises [5][6]. Group 2: Challenges and Opportunities - There are structural differences between China's capital market and mature international markets, including insufficient long-term capital supply and a tendency for short-term investments [8][12]. - The average transaction price of technology contracts in China is only one-fifth of that in the United States, indicating a need for a scientific intangible asset valuation system [8][12]. - As of 2024, A-share listed companies' R&D investment is expected to reach 1.88 trillion yuan, accounting for over 50% of the total social R&D investment, with technology companies' market capitalization share increasing from 12% to 27% over the past decade [7][12]. Group 3: Financial Ecosystem and Innovation - A differentiated capital market ecosystem that aligns with technological innovation and industrial transformation requires continuous institutional and product innovation [10][11]. - The need to enhance the diversity of financial products and improve the multi-level capital market structure is crucial for supporting the financing needs of technology enterprises throughout their lifecycle [10][11]. - The establishment of a scientific and reasonable delisting standard that includes innovation capability indicators, in addition to financial metrics, is essential for maintaining market order and protecting investor interests [11][12]. Group 4: Future Directions - Future efforts should focus on cultivating patient capital and providing comprehensive financial services that cater to the entire lifecycle of technology enterprises [12][13]. - Enhancing market inclusiveness and openness by relaxing market access restrictions will attract more domestic and international quality technology enterprises and investors [13][14]. - The capital market is positioned as a core hub linking technological innovation and industrial upgrading, with the potential to create a globally influential innovation capital aggregation hub [14].