Core Insights - Emerging markets are seen as key engines for global economic growth, with a focus on how they can maintain stability amid geopolitical tensions and changing trade relationships [1][3] - The shift from export-driven to consumption-driven economic models in China is a significant topic of discussion, emphasizing the need for domestic consumption and investment [3][4] Group 1: Economic Trends and Predictions - China's GDP growth is expected to exceed 5% in the second half of the year, driven by improving macroeconomic indicators, particularly in consumption [4] - The transition to a consumption-driven economy will require time and effort, with a growing emphasis on boosting consumer confidence [4][6] - Structural issues such as real estate, financial risks, and local fiscal pressures need to be addressed for sustainable economic recovery [5] Group 2: Consumption and Investment Focus - Domestic consumption is identified as a primary challenge for China's economy, with a significant gap of about 20 percentage points compared to the international average [6][7] - The focus should be on enhancing the consumption capacity of low-income groups and promoting service-oriented consumption, particularly in education, healthcare, and social security [7][8] - Recent data shows a notable increase in retail sales, with a 6.4% year-on-year growth in May, indicating positive effects from government stimulus measures [8]

"新"向未来——平安基金2025年中期投资策略会于6月25日-26日举行，多位行业专家对当前经济形势、 热门行业发展前景、资产配置等话题展开探讨。中泰金融国际有限公司首席经济学家李迅雷在本次会议 上作题为《外部环境不利影响加大下，中国经济走势与政策选择》的主旨演讲，深刻剖析了在特朗普 2.0时代"反秩序性"冲击下，中国经济面临的内外挑战与破局路径。李迅雷指出，随着全球步入高震 荡、低增长的新常态，中国亟需通过政策创新激活内循环潜力，并在资产配置中把握历史性机遇。 外部系统性冲击正在形成 在震荡中布局确定性 全球经济正步入高震荡、低增长时代，这一趋势对中国经济产生了深远影响。李迅雷指出，全球收入与 财富分化加剧，主要经济体前1%和10%的居民财富占比持续攀升，这种分化导致社会矛盾加剧，经济 政策的不确定性上升。 在外部环境变差的背景下，中国经济内循环面临诸多挑战。李迅雷指出，美国对华关税政策的不确定 性，可能导致中国出口下滑，进而影响经济增长、就业和企业盈利。此外，出口下降可能加剧产能过剩 问题，进一步抑制制造业投资，而消费市场的疲软也难以在短期内有效弥补外需的不足。 在当前局势下，资产如何配置成为市场关注的焦 ...

Economic Overview - In May, the overall economy maintained stable operation, with the macro policy effects such as the "old-for-new" consumption policy continuing to be released, and the export sector showing resilience [1][3] - The total retail sales of consumer goods in May increased by 6.4% year-on-year, accelerating by 1.3 percentage points from the previous month, marking the highest monthly growth rate this year [1][2] Consumption and Retail - The service retail sales from January to May grew by 5.2%, which is a slight acceleration compared to the previous four months, indicating a strong impact from holiday consumption [1][2] - The "618" e-commerce promotion and the "old-for-new" policy contributed to a further acceleration in consumer goods consumption in June [6] Investment and Export - Fixed asset investment (excluding rural households) from January to May grew by 3.7%, a decline of 0.3 percentage points from the previous period, with real estate investment dragging down the overall figure [2][4] - Real estate investment fell by 10.7% year-on-year from January to May, with the decline expanding by 0.4 percentage points compared to the previous period [2] - Manufacturing investment increased by 8.5% and infrastructure investment grew by 5.6% during the same period [2] Trade Performance - In May, exports grew by 4.8% year-on-year, while imports decreased by 3.4%, reflecting the resilience of exports despite a challenging external trade environment [2][3] - Cumulatively, from January to May, exports increased by 6%, while imports fell by 4.9%, indicating a strong export performance driven by "export rush" behaviors [2] Industrial Production - The industrial added value for large-scale enterprises in May increased by 5.8% year-on-year, maintaining a growth rate above 5.5% [4][5] - The service production index grew by 6.2% year-on-year in May, boosted by holiday consumption and a recovery in exports to the U.S. [4] Future Outlook - The chief economist at CITIC Securities highlighted that the "old-for-new" policy has supported the demand for major consumer goods, and further support for rural and lower-tier markets could enhance domestic consumption [6] - The government aims to implement more proactive macro policies to strengthen domestic circulation and promote high-quality economic development [5][6]

Group 1 - The A-share market is showing a clear upward trend, with a significant portion of stocks likely to provide profits for retail investors, despite their current pessimism [1][3] - The recovery of the real estate market is seen as a core element of domestic economic circulation, which will positively impact both the real estate and stock markets [3][5] - The expectation is that the Shanghai Composite Index will soon recover to 3400 points, but this does not guarantee that individual stocks will also rebound [5][7] Group 2 - The market sentiment is currently negative, particularly towards sectors like liquor and real estate, but historical patterns suggest that these sectors may lead the market recovery [3][5] - The upcoming policy measures are expected to focus on boosting consumption, particularly in real estate, which is viewed as a major commodity [5][7] - The overall market index is anticipated to rise, driven by a few key stocks, although individual stock performance may vary [7]

沉星月启：产业" 蜕变"vs政策 "革新"。 转型进入"新阶段"，面临的"新问题"。 2022年以来，转型进入"新阶段"，以地产为代表的传统链条对经济的贡献 出现趋势性下行，经济指标表现分化的同时，产业"冰火两重天"的情况常见。转型"新阶段"，压力更集中在终端 需求，导致PPI承压的同时CPI表现更弱，产能过剩领域转至中下游；更多供给转向海外的过程中，外贸板块内卷 更甚。 文 | 赵伟、屠强、贾东旭、侯倩楠 联系人 | 屠强 摘要 转型新阶段，传统政策框架有效性下降，政策"革新"全面启动。 居、企业和地方政府在经历报表冲击的同时，不 同主体间互相影响、修复过程慢于过往周期。传统宏观调控手段的传导机制异化，政策"革新"必要性上升。2024 年9月底以来，政策框架全面优化启动；总量政策空间打开、结构性政策的针对性增强，新阶段的"供给侧改革"呼 之欲出。 产业"蜕变"已成"星火燎原"之势，居民信心筑底现象已现。 历经十余年，新动能占比已"初具规模"，高技术产业 在工业中占比达16.3%，渐成星火燎原之势；近两年悦己消费、体验消费等新消费形式不断涌出。2025年以来，节 假日居民出行意愿等指标，则显示居民短周期信心的 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the report indicates that the profit growth rate for Q1 2025 turned positive primarily due to a low base effect rather than an inherent improvement in the profit cycle [2][13][21] - The report highlights that the A-share market is currently in the longest historical negative growth period, which has resulted in a very low base for comparison [2][15] - The analysis of Q1 2025 shows that overall demand has not yet shown signs of recovery, with revenue growth remaining weak [2][13] Group 2 - The report identifies that the profit growth rate in Q1 2025 exhibited structural differentiation, with significant contributions from the non-bank financial sector, non-ferrous metals, and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery sectors [3][33] - Non-bank financials contributed 51.4% to the profit growth, followed by non-ferrous metals at 33.4%, and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery at 30.4% [3][34] - Excluding these three sectors, the remaining industries continued to experience negative growth, with a decline of -0.61% [3][33] Group 3 - The report predicts that the inherent profit bottom for A-shares is not expected to occur before Q3 2025, considering the repair of corporate balance sheets and the impact of medium to long-term loans on industrial profits [4][36] - The analysis suggests that the difference in year-on-year growth rates between non-financial enterprises and household deposits serves as a leading indicator for A-share earnings performance [4][36][40] - The report also notes that the growth of new medium to long-term loans typically leads to an increase in corporate capital expenditures and profit expansion, although the current trend shows a decline [4][37][39] Group 4 - The report outlines that several industries are expected to maintain a growth rate of over 20% in Q1 2025, excluding base effects, including optical electronics, feed, aquaculture, marine equipment, and others [41][42] - The report emphasizes that the overall confidence of enterprises has not yet recovered, with both capacity and inventory cycles remaining at low levels [26][31] Group 5 - The investment strategy suggests focusing on domestic consumption sectors such as clothing, automobiles, and food, as well as technology and military sectors [5][47] - The report recommends attention to cost improvement-driven sectors like aquaculture and precious metals, and structural opportunities in overseas markets due to improved trade relations [5][47]

Group 1 - China's exports to the US have declined for three consecutive months, while US imports from China have not significantly increased, indicating a shift in trade dynamics [2] - The US is facing persistent inflation, with the Federal Reserve maintaining high interest rates, while the Biden administration struggles to balance trade policies and domestic pressures [2][6] - The agricultural sector in the US is feeling the impact of trade tensions, as evidenced by the cancellation of a significant pork order from China, highlighting the political ramifications of trade policies [2] Group 2 - The ongoing US-China competition has evolved from trade to technology and geopolitical strategies, with both countries attempting to leverage their respective strengths [4] - China's GDP growth in the first quarter was 5.2%, driven largely by domestic consumption, indicating resilience despite export challenges [4] - The export of new energy vehicles from China surged by 60%, reflecting strong global demand and market confidence [4] Group 3 - The solar panel and lithium battery sectors in China are facing overcapacity issues, leading to longer inventory turnover periods and operational challenges for manufacturers [6] - In the US, the imposition of reciprocal tariffs has backfired, contributing to rising inflation and increased costs for consumers [6][8] - Walmart is struggling to maintain its low-price model due to supply chain disruptions and rising costs, which could impact its sales performance [8] Group 4 - China's technology sector continues to face challenges from US restrictions, but there are signs of resilience, such as advancements in Huawei's chip capabilities and increased domestic production [9] - The geopolitical landscape is shifting, with US allies navigating their own interests, leading to a complex web of trade relationships [9][11] - The competition between the US and China is characterized by a struggle for strategic endurance and institutional resilience, rather than a clear winner [11][13]

Core Viewpoint - The report from CITIC Securities indicates a clear direction for Chinese policies aimed at boosting domestic demand, with expectations of improved consumer preferences for investment in the context of increased market volatility and uncertainty [1][4] Group 1: Consumer Trends - Current consumer trends are characterized by three main lines: rational consumption, quality upgrades alongside affordable alternatives; spending on emotional satisfaction and quality of life; and new consumption directions driven by technological advancements [1] - The traditional consumption sector is showing signs of recovery, particularly in essential goods, with Q2 2025 expected to be a bottoming window for many consumer industries [1][2] Group 2: Consumption Data and Performance - In the first half of 2025, consumer demand and price pressures are easing, with a notable rise in "quality-price ratio" consumption and strong demand for leisure and entertainment [2] - The recovery in consumer data, combined with strong performance in certain sectors, has led to increased marginal interest from investors in the consumer industry, although many sub-sectors remain at reasonable valuation levels [2] Group 3: Structural Changes and New Consumption - Four slow-moving variables are shaping the macroeconomic landscape in China: aging population, smaller households, AI-driven production changes, and complex external environments, leading to structural growth opportunities for new consumption companies [3] - New consumption characteristics are emerging from companies that meet consumer demands for emotion, health, and value, supported by innovations in AI and biotechnology [3] Group 4: Policy Impact and Short-term Outlook - The short-term recovery of consumer-related industry valuations is heavily reliant on overall expectations for the domestic macroeconomic environment, with 2025 potentially being a turning point [4] - Strengthening internal circulation and expanding domestic consumption markets are becoming necessary choices, with policy effects contributing to the ongoing recovery in both goods and service consumption [4]

Core Viewpoint - The forum highlighted the unique advantages and future development prospects of consumption REITs, emphasizing their role in expanding domestic demand and promoting consumption in the context of economic recovery [1][3]. Group 1: Advantages of REITs - REITs provide a mandatory annual distribution of at least 90% of the distributable amount to investors, ensuring long-term and stable cash flow [3]. - Listed REITs offer liquidity and can be traded in the secondary market like stocks, making them accessible for investors [3]. - The investment threshold for REITs is low, typically starting from a few hundred yuan, allowing ordinary individuals to participate [3]. Group 2: Consumption REITs Potential - Consumption REITs are seen as investment tools with stable returns and asset appreciation potential, particularly relevant in the context of domestic consumption and policy support [3]. - These REITs primarily invest in shopping centers, department stores, outlet malls, farmers' markets, and community commercial infrastructures, directly linked to consumer demand [3]. - The potential market size for consumption REITs is significant, with expectations that they will become the largest and most market-oriented segment among property REITs in the future [3]. Group 3: Investment Considerations - Consumption REITs offer ordinary investors the opportunity to engage in core commercial real estate with small amounts of capital, emphasizing the importance of underlying asset quality and management capabilities over short-term trading [4]. - Investors are encouraged to adopt a rational investment approach, thoroughly understanding product risks and characteristics through disclosure documents like fund contracts and prospectuses [4].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a neutral rating for the chemical industry [1] Core Insights - The current cycle is nearing its end, with expectations for demand recovery. Infrastructure and export remain robust, while the real estate cycle continues to decline. Recovery in consumption is anticipated after two years of stability [3] - Supply-side pressures are significant, with global chemical capital growth expected to turn negative in 2024. Domestic construction projects are declining, but fixed asset investment remains above 15% growth [3] - The chemical industry is entering a replenishment phase after a year of destocking, with price and profit levels expected to rebound in Q2 2024, although overall performance will remain under pressure for the year [3] Summary by Sections Industry Valuation and Economic Indicators - The report tracks various indicators including the comprehensive prosperity index of the chemical industry and industrial added value [2] Price Indicators - The report includes PPI, PPIRM, and CCPI, along with price differentials for chemical products [2] Supply-side Indicators - Key metrics include capacity utilization, energy consumption, fixed asset investment, inventory, and ongoing projects [2] Import and Export Indicators - The report analyzes the contribution of import and export values [2] Downstream Industry Performance Indicators - It covers PMI, real estate, home appliances, automotive, and textile sectors [2] Economic Efficiency Indicators - The report presents three major economic efficiency indicators for the industry [2] Global Macro and End Market Indicators - It includes procurement manager index, GDP year-on-year, civil construction starts, consumer confidence index, and automotive sales [2] Global Chemical Product Prices and Differentials - The report details prices and differentials for chemical raw materials, intermediate products, and sub-industries like resins and fibers [2] Global Industry Economic Efficiency Indicators - It discusses changes in sales, profitability, growth capacity, solvency, operational capacity, and per-share indicators [2] Chemical Product Prices and Production Indicators in Europe and the US - The report provides insights into the prosperity index, confidence index, capacity utilization, production index, PPI, and production index for the chemical industry in these regions [2]