戴康 CFA 广发证券发展研究中心 董事总经理（MD）、首席资产研究官 邮箱：daikang@gf.com.cn 报告摘要 ● 引言： 我们在25.2.28 《牛市二阶段，事缓则圆》 提示，港股周线6连阳后，短期行情有所透支，事缓则圆。 从历史经验看6连阳后不建议追涨，反而应关注落后的低波、股息、价值、质量因子。 ● 部分投资者仍然对"新投资范式"认识不足，对特朗普关税的底层逻辑存在误解。 疫情以来，全球从"大缓和"走 向"大波动"，G2在生产贸易（中国生产国VS美国消费国）、债务（中国私人高VS美国政府高）失衡突出，特朗 普政府企图通过非常规手段化解全球供给与需求失衡，世界秩序重塑不可逆。 ● 特朗普关税对全球资产的影响？ 关税一阶段定价征税国家的"通胀效应"+被征税国家的"需求收缩效应"、二阶 段定价被征税国家的应对措施（货币财政）。 ● 短期而言：在4.9（对等关税生效日期）前，以避险资产（美债&中债、瑞郎、黄金、红利等）为宜。 当前关键 问题除了关注各国之间的贸易谈判，在金融市场上还要关注基本面的问题是否会转换成流动性的问题。当前， （VIX、AAII熊牛价差、BNP全球风险溢价等指标显示）风险偏好下 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the impact of the U.S. tariff policy on both the U.S. and global capital markets, highlighting the uncertainty it brings [2][5][6] - The U.S. government, under President Trump, has implemented a series of tariffs on various trade partners, with rates ranging from 10% to 49% depending on the country [3][4] - The article emphasizes the historical context of globalization and its effects on economic structures, noting that globalization has significantly benefited countries like China while disadvantaging others like Japan and Europe [9][11] Group 2 - The article outlines the concept of disruptive innovation, explaining how it challenges existing market structures and creates new opportunities for growth [17][20] - It identifies the winners and losers of disruptive innovation, where disruptors gain market share and consumer benefits, while traditional companies face declining profitability and potential layoffs [20][22] - The article also discusses the macro-level changes brought about by disruptive innovation, particularly in sectors like healthcare, where traditional inefficiencies persist despite attempts at disruption [22] Group 3 - The article analyzes market drivers, particularly interest rates and stock risk premiums, and their influence on investment decisions in the context of the current economic climate [24][25] - It highlights the importance of revenue growth and operating profit margins for companies, particularly in relation to their exposure to international markets amid tariff uncertainties [26][27] - The article concludes that political and macroeconomic factors will increasingly influence company valuations, necessitating a shift in how investors assess potential returns [29]

以下文章来源于教你挖掘基 ，作者挖掘基 教你挖掘基 . 投资理财有方法，我们手把手教你挖掘牛基~ 在这个乍暖还寒的春日里，海外惊雷乍起。 手机推送接连震动——特朗普超预期的关税政策似灰犀牛般横冲直撞，全球风险资产在流动性冲击下犹如惊弓之鸟，一片风声鹤唳。 北京时间4月3日凌晨，特朗普公布对等关税措施：对全球征收10%的基准关税，4月5日生效；对美国贸易逆差最高的60个国家征收额外关税，其中中国商品面临 34%的关税税率加征，将于4月9日生效。 随后，中国商务部迅速11箭齐发，以同等力度反击：对所有美国进口商品加征34%关税，限制中重稀土出口，并 对16家美国实体列入出口管制管控。 （来源：Choice） 特朗普2.0时代关税政策不仅针对中国，更将欧盟、加拿大、墨西哥甚至印度洋的无人企鹅岛纳入打击范围，试图通过"极限施压"重塑全球贸 易规则。 书房台灯的光正好点亮案头那本泛黄的《论持久战》，封面上毛主席的笔迹苍劲如铁。 此刻的贸易硝烟，恰似1930年代延安窑洞里的灯火，穿透时空照亮今日的迷雾。 01 灰犀牛事件的"已知"与"未知" ——特朗普关税的本质 关税，这个看似简单的经济工具，是进口国对跨境商品设置的通行 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant implications of tariff increases proposed by the Trump administration, suggesting that it could lead to a major economic event comparable to the abandonment of the gold standard in 1971 [3]. Group 1: Historical Context - The article references the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods, resulting in an average tariff increase of about 20% [3]. - The consequences of the 1930 tariff included a 66% decline in global trade from 1929 to 1934, leading to the Great Depression in the United States and economic crises worldwide [3]. Group 2: Current Economic Situation - The current U.S. national debt exceeds $36 trillion, which is 120% of the projected GDP for 2024, with annual interest payments surpassing $1 trillion against a fiscal revenue of $4.9 trillion [4]. - The proposed tariff increases could generate an additional $300 billion to $600 billion in revenue for the U.S. government annually, which is seen as a critical factor driving the tariff strategy [4]. Group 3: Global Trade Dynamics - The article argues that the U.S. is moving towards a trend of de-globalization, as it attempts to protect its manufacturing sector in response to China's significant market share in global manufacturing [5]. - The imposition of high tariffs may lead to retaliatory measures from other countries, echoing historical patterns where such actions resulted in broader economic downturns [5]. Group 4: Investment Strategy - The article advises investors to remain calm and avoid emotional decision-making, suggesting that the current market environment is volatile and unpredictable [7]. - It highlights the importance of focusing on dividend-paying ETFs and being cautious with sectors that have high energy weightings, indicating a strategic shift in investment focus [7][8]. Group 5: Future Outlook - The author expresses optimism about 2025 being a significant trading year, encouraging investors to maintain patience and excitement for potential investment opportunities [9].

戴康 CFA 广发证券发展研究中心 董事总经理（MD）、首席资产研究官 邮箱：daikang@gf.com.cn 报告摘要 ● 引言： 开年以来，"Deepseek"触发中美科技此消彼长叙事，恒生科技为代表的中国科技资产领涨全球，而美股&美元表 现不佳。战略层面："Deepseek"带来中国科技资产的价值重估，但并未逆转（逆全球化加剧、债务周期错位、AI产业趋 势）三大底层逻辑，因此，全球资产配置仍然是反脆弱的"全球杠铃策略"。而战术层面："全球杠铃策略"应该如何调整，来 应对"东升西落"的新叙事？ ● 美股：低波动—>高波动，下调↓权重。 过去两年，标普500维持偏低的波动率，一定程度上源自内部成分股之间偏低的相 关性，偏低的相关性则源自AI产业叙事下（7姐妹为代表的）美股科技龙头与非科技龙头间的分化，增加美股的分散性。当 前，标普500内部成分股间的相关性仍处于历史低点。我们判断，2025年，均值回归的牵引力、美国经济衰退压力（美股或 面临系统风险）、美国AI产业趋势一枝独秀的格局被打破（科技股独立行情门槛变高）等因素都将带来美股个股间相关性提 升（美股科技龙头与非科技龙头之间的分化将收敛）—>美股波动率 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of the "Deepseek" narrative on global asset allocation, emphasizing the rise of Chinese technology assets while U.S. stocks and the dollar perform poorly. It suggests a "global barbell strategy" for asset allocation to navigate the changing dynamics of East rising and West declining [3][10]. Group 1: U.S. Stocks - U.S. stocks are expected to shift from low volatility to high volatility, leading to a reduction in their weight in asset allocation. The S&P 500 has maintained low volatility due to low correlation among its components, driven by the divergence between tech and non-tech stocks under the AI narrative [4][15]. - By 2025, factors such as mean reversion, recession pressures, and the breaking of the current AI trend will likely increase the correlation among S&P 500 stocks, resulting in higher volatility and necessitating a decrease in U.S. stock allocation [16][15]. Group 2: Chinese Stocks - Short-term, the Hong Kong stock market has shown signs of exhaustion after six consecutive weeks of gains, suggesting a wait for policy implementation and validation of the tech narrative. Historical data indicates that after such streaks, it is advisable to focus on lagging sectors like banks and utilities rather than chasing leading stocks [5][20]. - Long-term, the current rally in Chinese stocks is deemed healthier compared to previous policy-driven credit pulses. The weight of Chinese tech assets in portfolios should be increased, as the valuation gap between Chinese and U.S. tech stocks remains historically high, indicating potential for narrowing [5][24]. Group 3: Chinese Government Bonds - Chinese government bonds have not transitioned to a bearish phase but require more attention to timing due to increased volatility. The shift from passive to active deleveraging in the private sector suggests that the downward space for bond yields will narrow [6][43]. - The current yield on 10-year government bonds is approximately 1.8%, pricing in a 20 basis point rate cut. A trading range of 1.6% to 1.9% is recommended for core transactions [6][44].

Core Viewpoint - UBS reports that de-globalization is a significant trend driving stagflation, with tariffs and de-globalization leading to inefficiencies and potential reductions in actual economic growth rates, alongside increased inflationary pressures [1] Group 1: Economic Impact of Tariffs - UBS estimates that imposing a 60% tariff on 75% of Chinese goods exported to the U.S. and a 10% tariff on goods from other countries could result in a global GDP decline of 0.5% [1] - Inflationary pressures are expected to be volatile, primarily affecting the U.S. economy [1] Group 2: Market Reactions - The bond and stock markets are adjusting to the anticipated tariff increases, with U.S. 10-year real yields dropping by 30-50 basis points and 2-year inflation expectations rising by 70 basis points since January [5] - Tariff-sensitive stocks in the U.S. have underperformed the broader market by 17%, while in Europe, the underperformance is 9% [5] Group 3: Sector Analysis - Analysts in the U.S. are broadly downgrading revenue and earnings growth expectations for tariff-sensitive sectors such as durable goods, automotive, and retail [5] - In Europe, analysts maintain resilient expectations for sectors like automotive, luxury goods, and pharmaceuticals, which are also sensitive to tariffs [5] Group 4: Investment Strategies - UBS suggests that hard assets (gold and energy) are likely to outperform other asset classes due to rising credit and yield risk premiums, with a projected 3% decline in the S&P 500 index [8] - Investors are advised to consider selling put options on gold ETFs (GDX.US) and buying put options on financial sector ETFs (XLF.US) to "harden" risk exposure [8] Group 5: Future Economic Outlook - UBS believes that while the European market shows resilience, cyclical investors face risks, particularly as tariff-sensitive stocks may decline further by 10% due to lowered earnings expectations [9] - The impact of de-globalization is expected to lead to lower actual economic growth rates, increased inflation expectations, and heightened risk premiums associated with corporate profit growth [12]

Report Overview - The report is a weekly precious metals report dated March 31, 2025, focusing on gold price trends and influencing factors [2] Industry Investment Rating - No industry investment rating is provided in the report Core Viewpoints - In Q1, gold prices continued to rise, with New York gold rising from around $2,650 at the beginning of the year to around $3,100 at the end of the quarter, and Shanghai gold rising from around 620 to 720. The upward momentum mainly comes from three aspects: rising global inflation expectations due to US tariff hikes, increasing US economic recession expectations leading to weakening of the US dollar and US stocks and rising safe - haven demand, and declining US dollar credit, de - globalization, and de - dollarization [5] - In Q2, the US economy is expected to continue to weaken under the background of the tariff war, and the expectation of the Fed's interest rate cut may rise. The European economy is expected to improve, and the US dollar index and US Treasury yields are expected to be weak, with the US dollar possibly breaking below the 100 mark, which will provide upward momentum for gold prices. The continuous progress of the cease - fire in Russia - Ukraine may lead to a large - scale cease - fire agreement, and the easing of geopolitical tensions may put pressure on gold prices. Gold prices in Q2 may show a wide - range volatile and slightly upward trend [6] - In the long term, after Trump took office, he intensively introduced tariff - hiking policies, accelerating the processes of de - globalization and de - dollarization, reducing the US dollar credit, and continuously increasing the global demand for gold as a safe - haven and reserve. During the Fed's interest rate cut cycle, the opportunity cost of holding gold decreases, and the continuous increase in ETF demand will also drive gold prices up. Gold prices are expected to maintain an upward trend in the long term [6] Summary by Directory 1. Market Review 1.1 Weekly Trend - No specific content about the weekly trend is provided other than references to related charts 1.2 Indicator Gains and Losses - From March 21 to March 28, COMEX gold rose from $3,028.20 to $3,118.00, a 2.97% increase; COMEX silver rose from $33.53 to $34.82, a 3.85% increase; SHFE gold futures rose from 706.96 to 722.80, a 2.24% increase; SHFE silver futures rose from 8,207.00 to 8,512.00, a 3.72% increase. The US dollar index decreased by 0.12%, the US dollar against the offshore RMB increased by 0.16%, the 10 - year US Treasury real yield decreased by 0.02, the S&P 500 decreased by 1.53%, and the US crude oil continuous contract increased by 1.10%. The COMEX gold - silver ratio decreased by 0.85%, and the SHFE gold - silver ratio decreased by 1.42%. SPDR Gold ETF increased by 1.43, and iShare Gold ETF decreased by 0.41 [11] 2. New York Gold Breaks Through $3,100 - Last week, gold prices strengthened again after a strong high - level oscillation. New York gold reached the $3,100 mark, and Shanghai gold reached the 720 mark. The US dollar index and US stocks both showed a trend of rising, then falling, and a second bottom - testing [13] 3. Tracking of Other Indicators - As of March 25, compared with last week, long - position holdings decreased by 5,082 contracts, short - position holdings increased by 3,054 contracts, and net long - position holdings decreased by 8,136 contracts. This indicator is more sensitive to precious metal price trends than gold ETFs but has a lower update frequency and poor timeliness. In early March, gold prices rebounded after hitting the bottom, but the net non - commercial long - position holdings on COMEX continued to decline, indicating strong willingness of long - position holders to close their positions [17] - In Q1, the holdings of major global gold ETFs increased significantly, especially after Trump took office, which largely reflects the rising safe - haven demand in the context of de - globalization [18] 4. Conclusion - The conclusion is consistent with the core viewpoints, emphasizing the upward trend of gold prices in Q1, the influencing factors, the expected performance of gold prices in Q2, and the long - term upward trend [27][28]

Core Viewpoint - The economic indicators for March show a significant improvement, with EPMI rising 10.6 points to 59.6, marking a seasonal high, and BCI increasing 2 points to 54.8, the highest since June 2023, indicating a potential economic recovery starting from late 2024 [1][5][9]. Economic Indicators - The EPMI data for March indicates a strong upward trend, reaching 59.6, which is the second-highest level for March since 2019, suggesting improved economic conditions [4][5]. - The BCI also reflects a positive economic rhythm, with projections indicating initial recovery in late 2024, followed by a second dip in December and continued improvement in early 2025 [5][9]. Corporate Revenue and Profitability - The improvement in economic sentiment is expected to positively impact corporate revenues, as indicated by the rise in the sales expectation index for March. However, profitability is influenced by both volume and pricing, with a noted decline in the profit expectation index due to falling intermediate goods prices [3][6]. Price Trends - The consumer price forward index continues to rise, reaching a new high since the rebound began, indicating an improving trend in consumer prices. In contrast, the intermediate goods price index has not shown clear signs of recovery, with a decline observed in March after a brief rebound in February [6][7]. Inventory and Financing Environment - Inventory indicators have shown an upward trend, reflecting both proactive and reactive inventory adjustments by industrial enterprises. The BCI inventory forward index aligns with economic sentiment, primarily indicating proactive inventory replenishment [2][7]. - The financing environment index saw significant improvement in March, attributed to a more accommodative monetary policy and increased credit support for private and small enterprises [7][8]. Investment Sentiment - There are concerns regarding investment willingness, as the investment and hiring forward indices showed a decline in March, potentially linked to rising trade protectionism and external uncertainties, such as the recent tariff increases by the U.S. on Chinese products [8][9].

以下文章来源于出海潜望 ，作者周月明 出海潜望 . 放弃幻想，逆全球化已成既定事实 特朗普重返白宫，中国出海企业在北美市场正面临一场前所未有的"生存保卫战"。贸易保护主义明显抬头，中美关系复杂多变...这些都让曾经看似广 阔的北美市场充满了不确定性。 但挑战背后往往蕴含新的机遇。如何在特朗普2.0时代把握北美市场新机会？如何在变局中寻找破局之道？ 3月27日下午，虎嗅邀请了五位资深专家，分别从宏观政策、产品创新、线下渠道布局、TikTok布局以及数据合规环节，分享独到观察与实战经验， 为出海企业提供切实可行的应对之策。 凌晨3点，浙江一家主营袜子出口的企业车间内，负责人李天盯着电脑屏幕上的未读邮件，眉头紧锁。美国老客户发来邮件要求"共同承担新增关 税"，否则将取消季度订单。这已是本月第三个提出类似要求的客户。 "现在做跨境就像在雷区跳舞，政策、物流、平台规则随时可能引爆。"李天的苦笑背后，折射出中国出海企业2025开年就面临的集体困境：2025年2 月4日，特朗普宣布美国对中国输美商品加征10%关税，一个月后，关税再次从10%提升至20%。 "当前出海企业正遭遇"政策+物流+消费习惯"的复合型冲击。"深圳电子 ...