Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has issued the "Computing Power Interconnection Action Plan," aiming to enhance the efficiency and service level of public computing resources, promoting high-quality development in computing power through 16 key tasks across six areas [1][2]. Group 1: Key Tasks and Areas - The action plan outlines six main areas: strengthening the foundation of computing power interconnection, optimizing computing facilities interconnection, promoting resource sharing, innovating business interconnection, creating application scenarios, and ensuring network and data security [2]. - Specific tasks include tackling core technology challenges, establishing standards and norms, and developing interconnection rules [2]. Group 2: Application Scenarios - The plan promotes the application of computing power interconnection in enterprise-level scenarios such as artificial intelligence, scientific computing, intelligent manufacturing, remote medical care, and consumer-level scenarios like intelligent driving, cloud rendering, cloud computing, and cloud gaming [2]. - It encourages the integration of computing power interconnection with energy internet, industrial internet, and mobile internet for innovative applications [2]. Group 3: Implementation Support - To ensure the successful implementation of the action plan, the Ministry will enhance resource investment and create a supportive environment through policies, funding, talent, and resource allocation [2]. - The plan emphasizes the cultivation of enterprises and optimization of the industry ecosystem, supporting backbone computing power enterprises, high-tech companies, and specialized small and medium-sized enterprises [2].

Core Insights - The stock performance of major new energy vehicle manufacturers has shown significant divergence, with Li Auto being the only company to experience a decline in stock price year-to-date [1][2] Group 1: Stock Performance - Leap Motor leads the sector with a year-to-date stock increase of 68.36% [1] - Xpeng Motors follows closely with a cumulative stock rise of 64.97% [1] - Ideal Auto has seen a year-to-date stock increase of 23.05% [1] - Xiaomi Group's overall stock has risen by 53.91% due to its automotive business [1] - Seres has experienced a stock increase of 76.80% year-to-date and has initiated a secondary listing process [1] - NIO is the only company with a negative stock performance, showing a year-to-date decline of 16.74% [1] Group 2: Financial Performance - NIO reported a net profit loss of 6.891 billion yuan for Q1 of fiscal year 2025, with a year-on-year increase in losses of 31.06% [1] - NIO's liquidity ratio has decreased to 0.84, and its debt-to-asset ratio has reached 92.55% [1] - As of the end of Q1, NIO's cash and cash equivalents stood at 26 billion yuan, down from 41.9 billion yuan at the end of the previous year [1] Group 3: Market Trends - Analysts believe that the stock performance of new energy vehicle manufacturers is closely related to sales growth and technological advancements [2] - The upcoming launch of new vehicles by Xiaomi and Seres' IPO in Hong Kong are expected to create new market volatility in the sector [2]

汽车和汽车零部件行业周报 20250608 乘用车需求向好 智驾下沉与高端跃迁共振 2025 年 06 月 08 日 ➢ 本周数据：2025 年 5 月第 5 周（5.26-6.1）乘用车销量 46.6 万辆，同比 +18.3%，环比+16.7%；新能源乘用车销量 24.7 万辆，同比+30.1%，环比 +11.6%；新能源渗透率 53.1%，环比-2.4pct。 ➢ 本周行情：汽车板块本周表现弱于市场。本周（6 月 3 日-6 月 6 日）A 股汽 车板块下跌 0.01%，在申万子行业中排名第 25 位，表现弱于沪深 300（0.96%）。 细分板块中，摩托车及其他、汽车服务、汽车零部件分别上涨 2.66%、0.92%、 0.48%，乘用车、商用载客车、商用载货车分别下跌 0.12%、2.67%、5.93%。 ➢ 本周观点：本月建议关注核心组合【吉利汽车、比亚迪、小鹏汽车、小米集 团、伯特利、拓普集团、新泉股份、沪光股份、春风动力】。 ➢ 智驾下沉与高端跃迁共振，看好智驾加速落地。2025 年 5 月 28 日小鹏 M03 加推 Max 版（含 502km/600km 续航）及 Plus 版，上市 1 小时 ...

行 业 研 究 2025 年 06 月 08 日 投资评级：看好（维持） 行业走势图 数据来源：聚源 -24% -12% 0% 12% 24% 36% 48% 2024-06 2024-10 2025-02 汽车 沪深300 相关研究报告 《限定场景 L4 热潮起，自动驾驶逻辑 持续演绎—行业点评报告》-2025.5.29 《关注智驾商业落地及优质主机厂和 零部件公司 — 汽 车 行 业 周 报 》 -2025.5.25 《上海车展回顾——智能化普及，机 器人崛起—汽车行业周报》-2025.4.27 整车竞争加剧，智驾有望构筑差异化竞争力 ——行业周报 | 赵旭杨（分析师） | 徐剑峰（联系人） | 王镇涛（联系人） | | --- | --- | --- | | zhaoxuyang@kysec.cn | xujianfeng@kysec.cn | wangzhentao@kysec.cn | | 证书编号：S0790523090002 | 证书编号：S0790123070014 | 证书编号：S0790124070021 | 本周观点：关注智驾商业落地及优质主机厂和零部件公司 （1）车企开启新一轮价格调整 ...

Core Viewpoint - The newly drafted mandatory national standard for Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) systems will replace the existing recommended standard, expanding its applicability to M1 (passenger cars, SUVs, MPVs) and N1 (light commercial vehicles) categories, benefiting companies with AEB development capabilities and safety technology experience [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Impact - The new standard addresses the issue of "pseudo AEB" in the industry, raising the bar for suppliers regarding technical development, product reliability, cost control, and mass production capabilities [2]. - Performance standards require AEB systems in passenger vehicles to prevent collisions with stationary vehicles at speeds up to 60 km/h and with crossing pedestrians at speeds up to 40 km/h [2]. - The standard introduces new recognition requirements for vulnerable road users, mandating AEB systems to identify and respond to pedestrians, bicycles, and two-wheeled vehicles within a speed range of 20-60 km/h [2]. Group 2: Technological Advancement - AEB is evolving from a standalone safety feature to a core component of the intelligent driving ecosystem, with companies like Huawei and XPeng integrating AEB with other driving assistance technologies [3]. - The implementation of the AEB standard is expected to create significant opportunities for core component suppliers, with the global AEB market projected to reach 3.3 trillion yuan by 2024 [3]. - The introduction of the AEB standard will accelerate the internationalization of automotive safety technology in China, shifting the industry focus from "passive safety" to "active safety" and transforming vehicles from mere transportation tools to intelligent terminals [3].

Core Viewpoint - The rise of fake car insurance has become a significant concern, particularly for electric vehicle owners, who may confuse service products with legitimate insurance policies [1][3][4] Group 1: Identification of Fake Insurance - Fake car insurance often uses terms like "guarantee" or "service" instead of "insurance," and the premiums are significantly lower than standard car insurance [3][4] - Many consumers have mistakenly believed that service products, such as "motor vehicle loss guarantee," are legitimate insurance, leading to denied claims when seeking compensation [3][4] - The contracts associated with these fake products are not legally recognized as insurance contracts and lack the protections afforded by insurance law, increasing the risk of claim denial [3][4][5] Group 2: Consumer Awareness and Identification - Consumers should be vigilant and recognize that legitimate insurance policies are issued by licensed insurance companies, while fake policies often come from service or logistics companies [4][5] - Payment for legitimate insurance is made to the insurance company's official account, whereas fake insurance may involve payments to non-insurance entities or individuals [4][5] - Verification of insurance policies can be done through official channels or apps, which is not possible with fake policies [4][5] Group 3: Regulatory and Industry Response - Regulatory bodies need to enhance qualification reviews and legal frameworks to combat illegal operations in the insurance sector [6] - The insurance industry should promote self-regulation and improve consumer education to enhance risk identification capabilities [6] - The introduction of the "Car Insurance Easy to Insure" platform aims to facilitate the insurance process for electric vehicle owners, ensuring they can access legitimate insurance options [8] Group 4: Innovations in Insurance Products - Electric vehicle manufacturers are increasingly integrating insurance services into their business models, offering unique products that combine insurance with additional services [9][10] - Companies like BYD and NIO are developing innovative insurance products that leverage their technological advantages and provide comprehensive coverage [9][10] - Despite the advancements, challenges remain in defining responsibilities, data availability, and consumer understanding, necessitating collaboration and talent development within the industry [10]

Group 1: Revenue Growth and Performance - The company's revenue growth in 2024 and Q1 2025 is primarily driven by product structure optimization and increased value per vehicle [1] - Profit growth is attributed to effective cost control, leading to a decrease in expense ratio relative to revenue [2] - The company maintains a strong outlook for sustainable growth, focusing on smart and electric technology routes [2] Group 2: Production and Technology Development - The company has solid technical reserves in steer-by-wire technology and is progressing with several mainstream automakers, with some projects expected to be mass-produced by 2026 [2] - The steering industry is undergoing a competitive restructuring due to the acceleration of vehicle electrification and intelligence [2] - The company plans to enhance R&D investment to strengthen its position in the smart steering sector [2] Group 3: Market Expansion and Client Base - The company is actively expanding its international market presence and is in the process of qualification certification with several well-known international automakers [2] - Major clients in the passenger vehicle sector include traditional automakers like Chery and Geely, as well as new players like NIO and Li Auto [3] - The company is optimistic about revenue growth in 2025, driven by increasing penetration of new energy vehicles and demand for intelligent steering systems [3] Group 4: Future Product Launches and Collaborations - New production capacity in 2025 will focus on electric steering columns and R-EPS [3] - The company is engaged in technical exchanges for steering technology with various clients in the unmanned logistics vehicle sector [3] - The company has developed technology reserves in rear-wheel steering, with projects expected to be mass-produced by 2026 [3]

Group 1 - The electric G-Class from Mercedes-Benz has been acknowledged as a commercial failure, with high inventory levels at dealerships [1][4] - As of April this year, only 1,450 units of the electric G-Class have been sold, with China and South Korea each accounting for around 50 units [4] - In contrast, the sales of fuel and diesel versions reached 9,700 units, indicating a significant preference for traditional models over the electric variant [5][6] Group 2 - Despite the poor sales of the electric G-Class, the traditional G-Class continues to perform well, with a projected 18% increase in sales for Q1 2025 compared to the previous year [7] - The electric G-Class is technically capable off-road, featuring independent motors for precise torque control and improved water wading depth compared to fuel versions [24][26] - However, the emotional appeal and brand heritage associated with the traditional fuel-powered G-Class are critical factors influencing consumer preferences, as luxury car buyers value brand history and cultural significance [28][29] Group 3 - The luxury car market is increasingly competitive, with domestic brands in China offering advanced technologies that challenge traditional luxury automakers [32][36] - The shift towards electric vehicles raises questions about whether the historical prestige of brands like Mercedes-Benz can justify the high price points of their electric models [37][38] - Brands like Ferrari are opting for hybrid technologies instead of fully electric models, indicating a strategic approach to maintaining their luxury status while adapting to market trends [39]

Core Viewpoint - The introduction of a mandatory national standard for "Intelligent Connected Vehicle Combination Driving Assistance Systems" is expected to regulate the industry and promote healthy development in the smart driving sector [3][4][6]. Group 1: National Standard Announcement - The national standard project for "Intelligent Connected Vehicle Combination Driving Assistance Systems" has been proposed by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and is set to be executed by the National Automotive Standardization Technical Committee [3]. - The standard will apply to M and N category vehicles equipped with combination driving assistance systems, covering technical requirements such as motion control, driver state monitoring, system detection capabilities, and safety requirements [3][4]. Group 2: Industry Impact - The introduction of this standard is seen as a shift from "barbaric growth" to a dual-driven phase of "technology + compliance," fundamentally restructuring the competitive landscape of the automotive industry [4][6]. - As of 2023, the penetration rate of L2-level (combination driving assistance systems) in new energy passenger vehicles has reached 55.3%, with expectations to exceed 60% in 2024 [4]. Group 3: Addressing Misleading Promotions - The standard aims to mitigate the confusion caused by exaggerated marketing claims in the smart driving sector, which has led to consumer skepticism and safety concerns [4][5]. - Regulatory bodies have initiated measures to curb misleading advertising, emphasizing the need for automotive manufacturers to clarify system functionalities and adhere to safety protocols [6][7]. Group 4: Expert Opinions - Industry experts advocate for the standard to focus on core safety requirements while allowing flexibility for different technological paths [4]. - The consensus among experts is that clear standards will enhance consumer confidence and provide a framework for responsible marketing practices in the automotive sector [5][7].

螺旋实验室 . 公众情绪瞭望者 以下文章来源于螺旋实验室 ，作者螺旋君 来源丨 螺旋实验室（ID：spiral_lab） 作者丨 追命 编辑丨 坚果 图源丨Midjourney "中国 汽车产业的恒大已经存在 "。近日， 长城汽车董事长魏建军 的一番发言， 在汽车圈激起 了 千层浪 ，矛头直指近两年车圈的价格战。 魏建军在接受访问中指出， 纯电动车亏损严重，难以形成商业闭环 ，这是如今的 产业困境 。他直 言， "什么样的工业产品能降10万元还得到质量保证？" 事实上，魏建军近年已经不止一次呼吁 "反内卷"，他认为 过度的价格竞争只会导致恶性循环，对于 企业正常的发展而言，必须有合理的利润 。 在商业世界里，没有一家企业不是奔着 "盈利"的目标入场的。但过去两年，已有数十家车企倒下， 市场 竞争愈发激烈， " 价格战 "成为 了车企们无奈却又不得不选择的 "武器"，试图通过降价来抢占 有限的市场份额，缓解库存压力。 只不过，当人人都拾起 "低价武器"，与其喊话让市场"停一停，等一等"，当下如何跟上市场节奏， 反而才是车企当下最着急的命题。 立下盈利军令状 苦于车圈价格战的，并不只有魏建军一位。近日，小鹏汽车董 ...