Group 1: Tariff Adjustments Overview - Trump's recent reciprocal tariff adjustments categorize countries into three groups based on economic size and negotiation progress[1] - Major economies like China, the UK, India, and the EU saw no new tariff changes, indicating a potential return to rationality in Trump's tariff policy[1] - Japan and South Korea are under pressure for tariff adjustments due to slow negotiation progress and high geopolitical reliance on the US[1] Group 2: Specific Tariff Changes - 14 countries received updated tariff rates, with Japan and South Korea facing potential increases while countries like Cambodia saw reductions of up to 13%[2][3] - The new tariff rates for 11 of the 14 countries are whole numbers, suggesting a degree of subjectivity in the adjustments[3] - The deadline for tariff exemptions for countries other than China has been extended to August 1, 2025, while China's exemption remains valid until August 12, 2025[2][4] Group 3: Negotiation Dynamics - The adjustments appear to be more about leveraging negotiations rather than substantial tariff increases, as indicated by Trump's willingness to reconsider if countries express a desire to negotiate differently[10] - The focus on East Asian and Southeast Asian countries suggests ongoing strategic considerations in US-China relations, with Japan and South Korea as key negotiation points[11]

情增加，不过现货升水维持400元/吨，国内库存小幅增加。而海外延续去库，LME注销仓单增加。技术面 研究员: 王福辉 期货从业资格号F03123381 期货投资咨询从业证书号Z0019878 ，持仓增量空头增强，关注MA60支撑，重回前期震荡区间。操作上，建议暂时观望，参考26.0-26.8。 免责声明 本报告中的信息均来源于公开可获得资料，瑞达期货股份有限公司力求准确可靠，但对这些信息的准确性及完整性不做任 何保证，据此投资，责任自负。本报告不构成个人投资建议，客户应考虑本报告中的任何意见或建议是否符合其特定状况。本 | | | 沪锡产业日报 2025-07-09 | 项目类别 | 数据指标 | 最新 | 环比 数据指标 | 最新 | 环比 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 期货市场 | 期货主力合约收盘价:沪锡(日,元/吨) | 262890 | -2590 LME3个月锡(日,美元/吨) | 33320 | 60 | | | 8月-9月合约收盘价:沪锡(日,元/吨) | -30 | 70 主力合约持仓量:沪锡(日,手) | 26633 | 388 | | ...

Tariff Overview - As of May, the average tariff rate in the U.S. is 7.4%, with specific rates of 38.6% on China, 9.3% on Japan, and 6.2% on the UK[2] - The new tariffs on 14 countries will take effect on August 1, with an expected average tariff rate of 29%, only 4 percentage points lower than the initial rate of 33% set on April 2[5][10] Trade Negotiations - U.S.-Japan trade talks are at an impasse, particularly over auto tariffs, with Japan seeking to eliminate a 25% tariff[3] - The U.S. and Mexico are nearing an agreement to eliminate steel and aluminum tariffs, while negotiations with Canada are ongoing with a deadline set for July 21[3] Tariff Strategy - Trump is shifting to a "discriminatory tariff" framework, potentially grouping countries for tariff adjustments based on trade deficits and negotiation outcomes[2][4] - Approximately 100 countries with small trade surpluses with the U.S. may face a 10% tariff, while 18 countries could see tariffs ranging from 20% to 70% depending on negotiations[4] Economic Impact - The tariffs are expected to have significant effects on the U.S. economy, with concerns about rising unemployment rates projected to reach 4.4-4.6%[5] - The structural slowdown in the U.S. economy remains a concern despite recent positive non-farm payroll data[5] Risk Factors - Potential escalation of geopolitical conflicts could disrupt global economic stability and inflation control efforts[12] - A sharper-than-expected slowdown in the U.S. economy and a more hawkish stance from the Federal Reserve could impact future monetary policy[12]

Core Viewpoint - India, traditionally cautious in its diplomatic strategies, has unexpectedly chosen to confront the United States amidst the backdrop of Trump's impending "reciprocal tariffs" policy, signaling a significant shift in its approach to U.S. relations [1][3][5]. Group 1: India-U.S. Trade Relations - India has been under pressure from the Trump administration to lower tariffs on U.S. goods, especially as the U.S. has become one of India's largest trading partners [5][7]. - Despite a history of friendly relations, the U.S. demands, particularly regarding agricultural products, have led to a stalemate, with India unwilling to compromise on its agricultural market [8][10]. - On July 4, India announced retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods worth approximately $725 million, marking a public counteraction against U.S. trade strategies [11]. Group 2: Diplomatic Maneuvers - India's stance at the BRICS summit has shifted, moving from a supportive role of U.S. interests to a more confrontational position, indicating a strategic pivot in its international relations [12][15]. - India is also seeking to undermine U.S. influence on the global stage by collaborating with other international organizations and advocating for reforms in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) [13][15]. Group 3: Domestic Considerations - The Indian government's response to U.S. demands is influenced by domestic political factors, particularly the religious and cultural implications of agricultural policies, which are critical to Prime Minister Modi's political standing [17][19]. - Modi's firm stance on agricultural market control reflects the need to maintain support from significant voter demographics, particularly those influenced by Hindu religious beliefs [17][19]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The ongoing trade tensions between India and the U.S. could have wider repercussions, potentially affecting U.S. trade strategies and its broader geopolitical objectives, including its approach to China [19][20]. - India's awareness of China's trade negotiations with the U.S. has prompted it to adopt a more assertive position, as it seeks to enhance its own standing on the global economic stage [20].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. has announced an increase in tariffs on imports from 14 countries, with Japan being the first affected, leading to a stalemate in U.S.-Japan tariff negotiations [1][2]. Group 1: Tariff Negotiations - Japan has been actively negotiating with the U.S. since April, but despite seven rounds of talks, no substantial progress has been made [2][3]. - The main reason for the deadlock is the significant gap in demands between Japan and the U.S., with Japan seeking the removal of "reciprocal tariffs" and linking them to discussions on auto tariffs and steel/aluminum tariffs [2][3]. - The U.S. has rejected Japan's requests and pressured Japan to increase imports of U.S. cars and rice while reducing the trade deficit [2][3]. Group 2: Negotiation Dynamics - The complexity of the U.S. negotiation team, which includes multiple representatives from different departments, has contributed to the slow progress of talks, making it difficult for Japan to identify a clear point of contact [3][4]. - Japan has maintained a firm stance on auto tariffs, which are crucial to its economy, and has not used them as bargaining chips in negotiations [4][5]. Group 3: Political Context - The upcoming Japanese Senate elections on July 20 are influencing the government's approach, as Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's administration faces low approval ratings and potential loss of seats [5][6]. - Public sentiment in Japan has shifted against the U.S., with a majority of citizens supporting a firm stance rather than rushing to reach an agreement [6][7]. Group 4: Future Implications - The outcome of the Senate elections will directly impact the future of U.S.-Japan tariff negotiations, with a potential acceleration of talks if the ruling coalition retains a majority [6][7]. - The final agreement is expected to reflect the unequal nature of the U.S.-Japan alliance, suggesting that the terms will not be equitable [7].

Group 1 - The EU is preparing to sign a temporary "framework" agreement with the US, setting the tariff rate at 10%, which is equal to the baseline tariff imposed on the UK [1] - The US has proposed a draft agreement that offers limited tariff exemptions only for specific sectors like aircraft and spirits, while key industries such as automotive and pharmaceuticals receive no exemptions [2] - The EU is expected to face challenges in negotiations, as it is unlikely to achieve the same tariff reductions as the UK, particularly in steel and automotive sectors [2][3] Group 2 - The EU's negotiation strategy has faced criticism from businesses and some European countries, with calls for a quicker agreement [3] - In contrast, the UK has successfully negotiated a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on automotive imports and securing zero tariffs on steel and aluminum products [4] - The UK’s approach has been characterized as a straightforward business transaction, allowing for flexibility and understanding of US objectives [4]

Report Summary 1. Investment Rating - No investment rating for the industry is provided in the report [1][2][3] 2. Core View - The short - term outlook for EUA is bullish, while the medium - term is expected to be volatile, with a price range of €63 - 76 [2] 3. Summary by Related Catalogs Market Conditions - EUA auction price is 70.34 euros/ton, down 0.72%, and the bid - cover ratio is 1.46; EUA futures settlement price is 71.2 euros/ton, down 0.66%, with 1.76 ten - thousand lots traded, up 0.47 [2] - On July 7, 2025, EUA auction volume was 22,829 tons, auction price was 70.34 euros/ton, auction revenue was 324.55 million euros, and CBAM certificate price was 71.25 euros/ton [3] - From July 4 to July 7, 2025, EUA futures settlement price decreased from 71.67 to 71.20 euros/ton, down 0.66%; futures trading volume increased from 1.29 to 1.76 ten - thousand lots, up 0.47; futures open interest remained unchanged [4] - From July 4 to July 7, 2025, EUA spot settlement price decreased from 70.89 to 70.44 euros/ton, down 0.63%; spot trading volume increased from 2283 to 3352 lots; container shipping carbon cost increased from 11.97 to 12.04 dollars/TEU, and the proportion of freight increased from 0.57% to 0.57% [4] Strategy - The short - term strategy for EUA is bullish, and the medium - term is volatile, with a price range of €63 - 76 [2] Core Logic - Bullish factor: Trump signed an executive order to extend the suspension period of the "reciprocal tariff" from July 9 to August 1 [2] - Bearish factors: At the beginning of the week, the temperature in Central and Western Europe turned cooler, and the supply of wind and solar energy was sufficient, reducing the residual load; Sino - European trade frictions intensified [2]

据英国金融时报：与特朗普达成的协议将使欧盟面临比英国更高的关税，欧盟预计不能像英国钢铁、汽 车等受行业关税限制的产品那样，获得对美国市场的同等准入待遇。布鲁塞尔方面准备签署一项临 时"框架"协议，协议规定在谈判继续期间，美国的"对等"关税为10%。 ...

AI播客：换个方式听新闻 下载mp3 音频由扣子空间生成 美国总统特朗普决定将对等关税的实施时间推迟到8月1日，这一决定背后，又是财长贝森特发挥了关键 作用。 贝森特认为，与印度和欧盟等贸易伙伴的谈判正在取得进展，因此建议特朗普给予更多时间。 这已经是贝森特在此轮"关税战"中第二次"拯救"全球金融市场。 周三，特朗普还预告了一项根据另一法律授权实施的新一轮关税计划，计划对铜产品征收50%关税，对 药品征收最高达200%的关税，理由是"国家安全"。企业将有最多18个月的过渡期，以迁移相关药品供 应链。卢特尼克补充说，铜的相关公告将在周二发布，关于半导体和药品的新税率将在8月1日前公布。 仍有谈判空间，但并非每个国家都能达成协议 特朗普原希望"乘胜追击"，贝森特力挽狂澜 知情人士称，在发布延后谈判期限这一决定的前一个周末，特朗普在其位于新泽西州贝德明斯特的私人 高尔夫俱乐部内，通过电话和私下交谈与盟友进行磋商。他一度在"设定新的8月最后期限"与"直接寄出 不含日期、仅标示新关税税率的信件"之间权衡。 特朗普曾在公开场合表示，未来可能不再通过谈判达成协议以避免征税。但在听取了贝森特的意见后， 他改变了初衷——贝森特 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating The report does not explicitly provide an overall industry investment rating. However, it gives mid - term outlooks for each energy and chemical product, including "oscillating", "oscillating weakly", and "oscillating strongly" [278]. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The overseas macro - sentiment is warm, and crude oil is stronger than chemicals. The extension of the "reciprocal tariff" suspension period by the US boosts the risk appetite of the commodity market, and the imbalance in crude oil inventory accumulation and the strength of diesel cracking spreads lead to the limited impact of OPEC+ production increase on oil prices [1]. - The domestic chemical industry continues to oscillate and is looking for a new direction. Most energy and chemical products are currently showing weak supply - demand trends, with relatively small inventory pressure, and the fluctuation of the cost - end crude oil becomes the dominant factor [2]. - It is advisable to adopt an oscillating mindset towards the energy and chemical industry and wait for new supply - demand drivers [2]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Market News - Houthi rebels attacked a Liberian - flagged cargo ship in the Red Sea, causing at least two crew members to die. - Russia's daily crude oil shipments dropped to 312 million barrels as of July 6, the lowest since February, a 3% decrease from the previous period. - Ecuador's state - owned oil company declared force majeure due to potential damage to two parallel oil pipelines caused by heavy rainfall, and oil production decreased from 46 million barrels on July 1 to 33 million barrels on July 2. - EIA predicts that US oil production in 2025 will be 13.37 million barrels per day, lower than the previous forecast, and raises the expected average price of Brent crude oil futures in 2025 to $68.89 per barrel [5]. 3.2 Variety Analysis Crude Oil - **Viewpoint**: EIA's downward adjustment of production forecasts and Red Sea geopolitical events briefly boosted oil prices. - **Logic**: Macro and refined oil performances are good, but the upside space is limited. The reduction in Russia's seaborne exports, the increase in US crude oil inventories, and the decrease in refined oil inventories affect the market [4][6]. Asphalt - **Viewpoint**: The downward pressure on asphalt futures prices is relatively large. - **Logic**: OPEC+ over - production, sufficient domestic asphalt raw material supply, and weak demand lead to an over - estimated absolute price of asphalt [8][10]. High - Sulfur Fuel Oil - **Viewpoint**: The downward pressure on high - sulfur fuel oil futures prices is relatively large. - **Logic**: OPEC+ over - production, the weakening of power generation demand, and the increase in import tariffs lead to an increase in supply and a decrease in demand [11]. Low - Sulfur Fuel Oil - **Viewpoint**: Low - sulfur fuel oil futures prices follow the oscillation of crude oil. - **Logic**: It follows crude oil, but faces shipping demand decline, green energy substitution, and high - sulfur substitution, with low valuation [12]. LPG - **Viewpoint**: The cost - end support weakens, the fundamental pattern of supply - demand remains loose, and the PG futures market may oscillate weakly. - **Logic**: The reduction of CP prices, the accumulation of US propane inventories, and weak domestic demand lead to a supply - strong and demand - weak pattern [12][14]. PX - **Viewpoint**: The terminal start - up declines, and PX oscillates weakly. - **Logic**: OPEC+ is expected to maintain production increase, and the terminal market support is poor, with a downward trend in absolute prices [15]. PTA - **Viewpoint**: Terminal negative feedback causes PTA to oscillate weakly. - **Logic**: The expected weakening of the crude oil market, the increase in PTA spot circulation, and the possible reduction of downstream polyester factory production lead to a decline in the market [15]. Styrene - **Viewpoint**: Two sets of devices are planned to be put into production, and styrene oscillates weakly. - **Logic**: The supply - demand of styrene itself is expected to weaken, and port inventories accumulate, leading to a decline in spot prices [16]. Ethylene Glycol - **Viewpoint**: Overseas device restarts accelerate, and ethylene glycol continues to oscillate. - **Logic**: The supply pressure is increasing, and the 09 contract may continue to oscillate, while the 01 contract may face more pressure [18][19]. Short - Fiber - **Viewpoint**: The basis is stable, sales are sluggish, and short - fiber continues to oscillate. - **Logic**: Short - fiber sales have been weak for two weeks, and the downstream demand may reach an inflection point [19][20]. Bottle Chip - **Viewpoint**: It follows the fluctuation of raw materials, and the processing fee remains low. - **Logic**: Bottle chips are in the maintenance cycle, and the processing fee has limited downward space [20][22]. Methanol - **Viewpoint**: The port price continues to decline, and methanol oscillates downward. - **Logic**: Supply contraction during the maintenance period, weak terminal demand in the off - season, and the return of Iranian device operation lead to price oscillation [24]. Urea - **Viewpoint**: Supply and demand are both weak, and exports support the market. Urea may oscillate in the short term. - **Logic**: Indian urea import tenders boost the market, but supply and demand are both weak, and exports support the price [25]. LLDPE - **Viewpoint**: The US delays the tariff time - point, and LLDPE oscillates. - **Logic**: Oil price oscillation, weak raw material support, high supply, and low downstream demand lead to oscillation [27]. PP - **Viewpoint**: Maintenance slightly increases, and PP oscillates in the short term. - **Logic**: Oil price oscillation, weak cost - end support, high supply, and low downstream demand lead to oscillation [28]. PVC - **Viewpoint**: Low valuation and weak supply - demand lead to PVC oscillating. - **Logic**: New capacity is expected to be put into production, demand is in the off - season, and exports are difficult to increase, but market sentiment warms up [31]. Caustic Soda - **Viewpoint**: The spot rebound slows down, and caustic soda oscillates. - **Logic**: The increase in comprehensive cost provides support, while the procurement of large enterprises and the weakening of downstream demand limit the increase [32]. 3.3 Variety Data Monitoring Energy and Chemical Daily Indicator Monitoring - **Cross - Period Spread**: Different varieties have different cross - period spread values and changes, such as Brent's M1 - M2 spread being 1.14 with a change of - 0.01 [36]. - **Basis and Warehouse Receipts**: Each variety has corresponding basis and warehouse receipt data, like asphalt's basis being 236 with a change of - 18 and 91740 warehouse receipts [37]. - **Cross - Variety Spread**: There are cross - variety spread data and changes, such as the 1 - month PP - 3MA spread being - 254 with a change of 30 [39]. Chemical Basis and Spread Monitoring The report lists the basis and spread monitoring of various chemicals such as methanol, urea, styrene, etc., but specific data summaries are not provided in the text [40][52][63].