Group 1: Silver Futures Market - The total amount of silver futures in Shanghai Futures Exchange is 1,211,076 kilograms, with a decrease of 6,009 kilograms compared to the previous day [1][3] - The main silver futures opened at 9,110 CNY per kilogram, reached a high of 9,282 CNY per kilogram, and a low of 9,095 CNY per kilogram, closing at 9,273 CNY per kilogram, reflecting a daily increase of 1.36% [1] Group 2: Federal Reserve Policy Debate - A rare policy dispute is occurring within the Federal Reserve, with Governor Cook expressing a hawkish stance, warning that tariffs are pushing up consumer prices and necessitating restrictive policies to curb inflation expectations [2] - In contrast, San Francisco Fed President Daly advocates for two rate cuts by the end of the year, arguing that the actual impact of tariffs is milder than expected and cautioning against over-tightening that could harm the job market [2] - Governor Waller proposed a surprising view that a 25 basis point rate cut should occur in July, citing three compelling reasons: the temporary nature of tariff inflation, economic growth below potential, and hidden risks in the job market [2]

Group 1 - The recent U.S. economic data indicates that tariff policies are beginning to show signs of inflation in prices, marking the first time such signals have been captured in official data [1] - The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for June showed an annual increase from 2.4% in May to 2.7% in June, leading to a brief sell-off in the bond market [1][2] - The Producer Price Index (PPI) for June reported zero growth, stabilizing the market after the CPI report [1][2] Group 2 - Core consumer prices, excluding automobiles, rose by 0.6% month-over-month in June, the largest monthly increase since 2022, with notable increases in home goods and appliances [2] - PIMCO suggests that the CPI data may support the Federal Reserve's cautious stance, indicating room for potential rate cuts in September and beyond [2] - The PCE price index is expected to reach 2.8% in June and potentially 3% in July, which could diminish the likelihood of a rate cut in September [3] Group 3 - Current bond market sentiment views the inflation caused by tariffs as a "temporary adjustment" that will be absorbed in a few months, with prices expected to stabilize near the Fed's target [3] - The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield is currently around 4.45%, which is considered attractive for investors [3][4] - Despite recent tariff-related news, the U.S. Treasury market has remained stable, with the 10-year yield fluctuating within a narrow range of 15 basis points [3]

Inflation Data - In June, the US CPI increased from 2.4% to 2.7%, matching expectations, while core CPI rose from 2.8% to 2.9%, slightly below the 3% forecast[1] - Month-on-month, CPI rose by 0.3%, consistent with expectations, while core CPI increased by 0.2%, below the expected 0.3%[1] Tariff Impact on CPI - The inflation effect of tariffs was evident in June, with furniture prices rising by 1% (previously 0.3%), clothing by 0.4% (previously -0.4%), and entertainment goods by 0.8% (previously 0.4%)[3] - It is estimated that tariffs have contributed 14% to CPI if core prices remained at February levels, and 40% if they followed last year's declining trend[4] Future Tariff Effects - Assuming the overall tariff rate increases to 17.3%, the remaining unaccounted tariff impact on core prices could add approximately 2.7-2.9 percentage points, translating to a 0.5-0.54 percentage point increase in overall CPI[5] - If the remaining tariff effects manifest over the next three months, the CPI year-on-year could reach 3.2% and 3.3% in Q3 and Q4, respectively[10] Market Reactions - Following the CPI report, market expectations for interest rate cuts slightly decreased, with the anticipated number of cuts dropping from 1.93 to 1.76 for the year[1] - The probability of a rate cut in September fell from 60.1% to 55%, while year-end policy rate expectations rose from 3.846% to 3.89%[1]

Group 1: Inflation and CPI Data - In June, the US CPI increased year-on-year from 2.4% to 2.7%, matching expectations, while core CPI rose from 2.8% to 2.9%, slightly below the 3% forecast[2] - Month-on-month, CPI rose by 0.3%, consistent with expectations, while core CPI increased by 0.2%, below the expected 0.3%[2] - The proportion of CPI items with year-on-year increases exceeding 2% rose from 40.8% to 44.1%, indicating a broadening inflationary trend[24] Group 2: Tariff Impact on CPI - The estimated impact of tariffs on CPI shows that if core goods prices remained at February levels, the tariff effect could account for 14% of CPI; if prices followed last year's downward trend, the effect could be 40%[4] - The remaining unaccounted tariff impact on core goods prices is estimated to be around 2.7-2.9 percentage points, translating to an overall CPI impact of 0.5-0.54 percentage points[23] - For specific high-import-dependency goods, tariffs have been reflected in CPI as follows: toys and games (52%), furniture (70%), clothing (10%) if prices remained at February levels[18] Group 3: Market Expectations and Economic Outlook - Market expectations for interest rate cuts have slightly cooled, with the anticipated number of cuts for the year decreasing from 1.93 to 1.76, and the probability of a September cut dropping from 60.1% to 55%[2] - Bloomberg's consensus forecast for year-on-year CPI in Q3 and Q4 is 3.1% and 3.2%, respectively, reflecting the anticipated impact of remaining tariffs[23]

Core Viewpoint - The June PPI in the U.S. showed no month-on-month growth, with service prices unexpectedly declining and moderate increases in goods prices, indicating that the current "inflation pipeline" is not heating up. However, revisions to previous data and a rebound in intermediate demand goods may signal potential risks in the future [1][10]. Group 1: PPI Data Overview - The June PPI year-on-year increased by 2.3%, significantly lower than the expected 2.5%, marking the lowest year-on-year growth since September 2024. The previous value was revised from 2.6% to 2.7% [1]. - The core PPI year-on-year growth was 2.6%, the lowest since March 2024, also below the expected 2.7%, with the previous value revised from 3% to 3.2% [2]. Group 2: Price Movements in Goods and Services - Despite the overall zero growth in PPI, there was a moderate rebound in goods prices, with final demand goods prices rising by 0.3%, the largest increase since February [3]. - Excluding food and energy, goods prices also rose by 0.3%, indicating a broad but moderate inflationary trend [4]. - Energy prices increased by 0.6% month-on-month, while food prices rose by 0.2%. However, energy prices remain in a "deflationary" state year-on-year, providing a buffer for overall PPI growth [5]. Group 3: Service Prices and Inflation Dynamics - Service prices declined by 0.1% month-on-month, down from a previous increase of 0.4%, which was a major driver of the weaker PPI [7]. - The "deflationary" effect in services has successfully offset the price pressures from the goods sector, as companies have not fully passed on tariff pressures, leading to moderate changes in profit margins [8][10]. - The transmission of "tariff inflation" has not fully materialized in June, appearing more like a delayed process [9]. Group 4: Future Outlook and Economic Implications - The path of inflation remains uncertain, with "lagged transmission" being a core concern for the market. Economists believe the coming months will be critical for observing whether "tariff inflation" will be fully released [10]. - The upcoming PCE data is expected to reflect a "moderate inflation" trend, providing the Federal Reserve with room to maintain its interest rate policy in the short term [12].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for the Federal Reserve to adopt a "patient" approach in adjusting the benchmark interest rate amid economic uncertainties [1][5] - Collins expresses confidence in the resilience of the current U.S. economy, suggesting that the overall impact of tariffs may not be as severe as previously feared, due to the flexibility of businesses in adjusting profit margins and resilient consumer spending [3][8] - The analysis of the tariff transmission mechanism indicates that while rising import prices may push inflation up, the adverse effects on economic growth and employment may be limited due to the buffering capabilities of businesses and consumers [3][5] Group 2 - The current policy deadlock at the Federal Reserve is highlighted, with a consensus that the likelihood of a rate cut in July is low, as decision-makers await data to assess the actual impact of trade policies on the economy [5][8] - Internal divisions within the Federal Reserve are noted, with differing opinions on the implications of new tariff policies for inflation and the potential for rate cuts [5] - Collins' stance on "active patience" provides the Federal Reserve with a valuable observation window, especially as the tariff suspension period is extended, allowing for a more thorough evaluation of the economic impact [8]

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content found Group 2: Core Views of the Report - In June, both the total CPI and core CPI increased, with the core CPI performing better than expected. The CPI increased by 2.7% year-on-year (expected 2.64%, previous 2.4%), and 0.3% month-on-month (0.2 pct higher than the previous month). The core CPI increased by 2.9% year-on-year (expected 2.95%, previous 2.8%), and 0.2% month-on-month (0.1 pct higher than the previous month). Neither the CPI nor the core CPI year-on-year has exceeded the inflation level in February this year [2]. - In June, both energy and food in the CPI rebounded. The energy sub - item increased by 0.9% month-on-month (previous - 0.1%), with gasoline prices rising by 1% month-on-month, the largest increase since January. The food sub - item increased by 3.0% year-on-year, higher than the overall CPI increase, and 0.3% month-on-month, with significant increases in fruits, vegetables, and beverages [3]. - From the perspective of demand - sensitive indicators, the prices of used and new cars continued to decline, indicating that tariff shocks are weakening consumer demand and confidence. The US consumer confidence index dropped to 93% in June (previous 98.4%). However, the used - car wholesale market has seen strong growth, and the Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index shows that the wholesale price increased by 6.3% year-on-year and 1.59% month-on-month, which may pose an inflation risk in the future and restrict the Fed's interest - rate cut rhythm. From the perspective of demand - lagging indicators, the furniture price growth rate increased to 1.0% month-on-month (previous 0.3%), reflecting the real impact of tariffs on prices. The price divergence between essential and non - essential goods is intensifying [4]. - The increase in the service - type CPI was far lower than the overall CPI increase, only returning to the level in April. Housing inflation may be at an inflection point, and the rent levels of various housing - related items have declined. Many service - type CPI sub - items, such as accommodation and motor vehicle insurance, decreased month-on-month, while only medical care services and other essential services increased [5][7]. - Tariff - related commodity prices started to rise, and consumers began to favor low - price commodities. The supply chain has recovered after the tariff suspension, but the accumulated costs of enterprises are being transferred to the retail end. From the demand perspective, consumers are reshaping their consumption structure, giving up service - type consumption and turning to essential and low - price goods [7]. - The inflation pattern has entered a tug - of - war between the one - time push of tariff costs and the trend of weakening endogenous demand. The "tariff cost pushing up inflation" and "salary slowdown and weakening demand" are in a two - way game for prices. In the future, the prices of commodities relying on imports in the supply chain are likely to rise, but it may be a one - time adjustment. Currently, demand has shown a marginal weakening. If there is no special intervention, consumers will reshape the demand pattern. The Fed's attitude towards tariffs is still uncertain, and there are different expectations for future interest - rate cuts [6][7][8]. Group 3: Summaries According to Relevant Catalogs 1. Important Charts - **CPI and Core CPI Year - on - Year**: The chart shows the year - on - year trends of the US CPI and core CPI, along with their predicted values [15][16]. - **CPI and Core CPI Month - on - Month Trends**: These charts display the month - on - month trends of the CPI and core CPI in 2020 - 2025, allowing for comparisons across different years [17]. - **CPI Sub - item Seasonally - Adjusted Month - on - Month and Year - on - Year Situations**: This table presents detailed data on the seasonally - adjusted month - on - month and year - on - year changes of various CPI sub - items from July 2024 to June 2025 [19][22]. - **International Oil Prices and Used - Car Wholesale Prices**: The international oil prices increased in June due to geopolitical risks but started to decline in July. The used - car wholesale prices showed strong growth [20][21]. - **Rent Level Leading Indicators and Supply Chain Pressure**: The rent level leading indicators are on a downward trend, and the supply chain pressure has returned to equilibrium, but sales have declined [24]. - **Average Hourly Wage Growth and Core CPI Growth Difference**: The difference between the average hourly wage growth and the core CPI growth is narrowing. If the wage growth continues to be higher than the inflation rate, it may lead to a "wage - price" spiral [25][26][28]. - **Average Hourly Wage Growth and Productivity Growth Difference**: The difference between the average hourly wage growth and the productivity growth is widening. If the wage growth continues to be higher than the productivity growth, it may lead to a vicious cycle [25][27][28]. 2. Risk Warning - No relevant content will be included as per the requirements

AI播客：换个方式听新闻 下载mp3 音频由扣子空间生成 自美国总统特朗普第二任期开始不久后，威胁对国际贸易体系进行数十年来最大规模的全面重塑以来， 主流经济学家就一直警告物价将大幅上涨。 但现在，2025年已经过半，这场半个世纪以来最深刻的贸易重组也已进行多月，所谓"关税推动的通 胀"却迟迟没有出现。 从美国的财政数据来看，关税确实已经实施。财政部目前已征收创纪录的1000亿美元关税，今年预计将 达到3000亿美元。这些关税由美国进口商，如沃尔玛及其他零售商在商品入境时支付。 关税需要一段时间才会逐步传导到终端价格，并最终影响官方通胀指标中的整体价格水平。 然而，真正让人困惑的是：目前关税带来的价格上涨在通胀数据中完全没有体现。 在过去的连续四个月里，美国劳工统计局公布的官方通胀数据都低于预期，5月的CPI通胀仅为2.4%。 总统经济顾问委员会（CEA）上周甚至发表简报称，进口价格实际上在下降。 通胀数据中为何看不到关税冲击？《财富》杂志采访的顶级经济学家们给出了一些解释。几乎所有受访 经济学家都提到：关税并不意味着卖家可以"直接涨价"，而是引发进口商、出口商与美国消费者之间一 场复杂的博弈。不同商品和行业 ...

智通财经APP获悉，经济学家长期以来一直警告称，关税将推高美国通胀。即将公布的消费者物价报告 将检验他们的判断是否准确。在连续四个月高估消费者价格指数(CPI)之后，预测人士预计美国劳工统 计局在周二发布的6月CPI数据将显示通胀加快;家具、玩具和娱乐商品以及汽车等受关税影响的品类价 格上涨预计将结束此前一系列温和的物价数据。 这对美联储来说是一个棘手的局面。美联储今年一直坚守维持利率不变的立场，理由是预计关税将推动 通胀上行，尽管这种情况尚未出现。如果此次CPI数据依旧温和，几乎可以肯定将再次激怒美国总统特 朗普——他已多次呼吁美联储降息，并公开批评美联储主席鲍威尔。 美联储官员和私营部门预测人士普遍认为，随着企业开始将特朗普征收的关税转嫁给消费者，今年夏天 通胀将会上升。虽然许多公司最初选择通过提前增加库存或牺牲利润来吸收部分更高的成本、从而保护 消费者，但现在他们的一些应对措施已经捉襟见肘。 EY-Parthenon首席经济学家Gregory Daco表示："企业依然在利用各种策略来缓解关税的影响。"他预 计，关税将推动6月整体CPI月度增幅的三分之一，夏季晚些时候还会有更大的冲击，"但随着时间的推 移 ...

Group 1: Macro Overview - The report highlights the potential for increased tariffs by the US, with effective tariff rates possibly returning to around 20%, raising global trade friction risks [2][8] - The anticipated GDP growth for China in Q2 is projected at 5.4%, with a focus on the upcoming economic data releases [2][8] - The report notes that the real estate and anti-involution topics are expected to be discussed in the upcoming high-level meetings in July, aligning with high-quality development frameworks [2][8] Group 2: Anta Sports (2020.HK) - Anta Sports is positioned as a leading multi-brand sports company with a global layout, focusing on professional sports and lifestyle markets, expecting a revenue of 70.826 billion RMB in 2024, a 13.58% increase year-on-year [23][24] - The company’s main brand is diversifying, optimizing channel quality through a "thousand stores, thousand faces" strategy, enhancing its market coverage with various store types [24][25] - The outdoor segment is expected to contribute significantly, with FILA projected to achieve revenue of 26.626 billion RMB in 2024, a 6.1% increase, while the professional sports segment is anticipated to grow by 53.7% to 10.68 billion RMB [25][26]