这是我 2018 年到 2022 年朋友圈的整理，也是我这几年对反思的零碎反思。 1、 "小成需要朋友，大成需要对手。"-解放军语录 2、早上看见《道德经》这段，大概意思就是，器物真正发生作用的不是本身"有"的部分，是中间"空"和"无"的那部分。 "三十幅共一毂，当其无，有车之用。埏埴以为器，当其无，有器之用。凿户牖以为室，当其无，有室之用。故有之以为利，无 之以为用。" 3、黄峥说，"要把对成就一个无限完美的自己的兴趣，转移为对外部客观事物的兴趣。" 4、错误的正反馈："人生最不幸处，是偶一失言而祸不及；偶一失谋而事幸成；偶一恣行而获小利；后乃视为故常，而恬不为意，则莫大之 患，由此生矣。" 5、穷人的快乐是花钱，富人的快乐是省钱。 6、看见一个人的朋友圈签名是"顺大势，逆小势"。 7、去朋友家玩，还没进门，看见大门上贴着一个便条 "Those doors we open and close each day decide the lives we live". 现在他们要合租找室友了，合租公告里最后一段写着 "And those who were seen dancing were thought to ...

Core Viewpoint - The film "The Stage" marks Chen Peisi's return to the big screen after 32 years, facing competition from other summer releases, leading to a delay in its premiere from July 17 to July 25 [1][2] Group 1: Film Background and Reception - The film is adapted from a highly acclaimed stage play that had 335 performances and a Douban rating of 9.0, creating a dual-edged sword of expectations among audiences [2] - The film's initial reception is influenced by nostalgia for Chen Peisi's past performances, but younger audiences may not be familiar with him, impacting box office performance [12][13] - The film has grossed over 3.5 billion, but its momentum is slowing as it competes with other films like "The Little Monster of Langlang Mountain" and "Nanjing Photo Studio" [1] Group 2: Story and Themes - Set during the warlord era in the Republic of China, the film juxtaposes the chaos of war with the everyday lives of citizens who continue to enjoy traditional performances [2][4] - The narrative explores the absurdity of power dynamics, where an unqualified warlord disrupts a theatrical performance, highlighting the intersection of art and authority [5][6][8] - The film reflects on the struggle between survival and artistic integrity, emphasizing the importance of continuing to perform despite external pressures [7][9] Group 3: Character Development and Artistic Intent - Chen Peisi's character, the troupe leader, embodies the tension between adhering to artistic traditions and the demands of a powerful figure [10][14] - The film's portrayal of characters navigating absurd circumstances serves as a commentary on the broader societal chaos of the time [8][9] - Chen Peisi's return to film is seen as a personal and artistic milestone, reflecting his long-standing commitment to the craft of comedy and theater [15][16]

Core Insights - The article reflects on the challenges faced by companies in traditional industries during economic downturns, highlighting the struggles of a friend who is facing bankruptcy after years of effort in a once-promising venture [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Challenges - Companies in traditional industries are experiencing significant difficulties, with many unable to survive without extreme cost control or non-compliance with regulations [1]. - The friend mentioned that in a declining market, attempting to innovate in traditional sectors feels like "swimming in a cesspool," leading to inevitable failures [1]. - The lack of investment in such companies is evident, as they struggle to attract funding without a strong technological or AI narrative [1]. Group 2: Entrepreneurial Reflections - The friend expressed regret over his entrepreneurial choices, noting that despite a promising start, the industry has not yielded successful outcomes for any of the companies in his cohort [2]. - He criticized the prevailing entrepreneurial wisdom that emphasizes long-term commitment and idealism, suggesting that a focus on immediate profitability would have been more beneficial [2]. - The article mentions several companies that were once successful but have now faced significant setbacks, illustrating a broader trend of failure in the industry [2]. Group 3: Future Opportunities - The conversation shifted towards exploring future opportunities in AI, indicating a potential pivot for entrepreneurs seeking new ventures [3]. - The friend is now focused on quickly generating capital to address personal debts, reflecting a shift in priorities from long-term vision to immediate financial needs [3].

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk's brief political career in the White House ended in disappointment, with no significant achievements and a decline in Tesla's market value by over 30% since his arrival [2]. Group 1: Musk's Idealism vs. Political Realism - Musk is characterized as a staunch idealist, which contrasts sharply with the complexities of political life, where interests must be negotiated and divided [4][7]. - Successful entrepreneurs often prioritize societal benefits over immediate profits, a trait Musk shares as seen in his ventures like space exploration and renewable energy [6]. - The political environment is inherently different from business, where idealism can lead to conflicts with established interests and bureaucratic resistance [8][9]. Group 2: Challenges Faced in the White House - Musk's attempt to implement efficiency reforms in the government led to backlash from various interest groups, resulting in chaos within the White House [7][9]. - His idealistic approach, which worked in his companies, proved ineffective in the political arena, where compromise and pragmatism are essential [8][9]. - Ultimately, Musk's decision to leave the White House was seen as a recognition of the mismatch between his idealistic vision and the realities of political governance [9][10].