Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - Since 2024, the supply pattern of the credit bond market has been reshaped, with industrial bonds and secondary and perpetual (Er Yong) bonds replacing urban investment bonds as the main forces, showing significant structural characteristics. In 2025, affected by multiple factors such as market fluctuations and stricter regulations, the supply of credit bonds has slightly decreased year-on-year. The supply of industrial bonds remains high, but the supply of ultra-long-term bonds has declined. The supply of Er Yong bonds has increased to some extent, with state-owned large commercial banks as the main issuers. The supply of urban investment bonds is still restricted, and the real estate financing remains sluggish. The highlight of this year's supply is the science and technology innovation bonds, which have been extended to financial institutions and the issuance has accelerated. [1][11][12] - Looking forward to the second half of the year, the overall supply may be flat, and the net supply may still be dominated by central and local state-owned enterprise industrial bonds and national and joint-stock Er Yong bonds. Attention should be paid to the expansion of science and technology innovation bonds. In the long term, the core of credit supply growth lies in the recovery of real financing demand. [31] Summary by Directory Credit Hotspots: Credit Bond Supply Characteristics - From 2020 to 2023, urban investment bonds were the main contributor to the credit bond market. After the release of the "Document 35" in 2023, under the strict supervision of urban investment bonds, the net financing amount decreased significantly. In 2024, due to the continuous evolution of the asset shortage, the supply of industrial bonds increased, especially the issuance of long-term varieties over 10 years. [11] - As of May 31, 2025, the net financing amount of credit bonds was 10,824 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 19.4%. Industrial bonds are still the main force in credit bond supply, and the issuance entities continue to concentrate on high-quality ones. The real estate bond market is still in the process of repair and adjustment, and the net financing amount remains at a relatively low level. The supply of urban investment bonds is limited under continuous strict supervision and debt resolution. The supply of Er Yong bonds has increased, with state-owned large commercial banks as the main issuers. [12] - In 2025, the net financing amount of industrial bonds is lower than the same period last year, with a year-on-year decrease of 9.12%. The supply of industrial bonds is mainly within 3 years, and the net supply of industrial bonds over 10 years has decreased significantly. The supply of Er Yong bonds has decreased year-on-year, and joint-stock banks have become the main supply force. [14][19] - In May 2025, the issuance of science and technology innovation bonds accelerated, with a monthly issuance of over 350 billion yuan, a record high. Structurally, financial science and technology innovation bonds accounted for 62%, mainly commercial bank bonds, and non-financial enterprise science and technology innovation bonds accounted for 38%, mainly central and local state-owned enterprises. [31] Market Review: The Central Bank Announced Trillion-Level Reverse Repurchase Operations, and Er Yong Bonds Performed Relatively Stronger - From May 30 to June 6, 2025, the central bank announced a 1-trillion-yuan outright reverse repurchase operation at the beginning of the month, and the money market was loose. Interest rate bonds strengthened, while corporate credit bonds showed mixed performance. The short-term yields of corporate credit bonds increased slightly, the medium and long-term yields of medium and low-grade bonds performed relatively well, and most of the spreads were passively widened. The yields of Er Yong bonds decreased by about 3BP, and the short-term spreads decreased slightly. [2][36] - Last week, the buying volume continued to increase, with wealth management products net buying 10.4 billion yuan and funds net buying 15.5 billion yuan. The median spreads of public bonds in various industries increased by about 1BP, and the median spreads of urban investment bonds in various provinces showed mixed performance, with the spreads in Guizhou decreasing significantly. [2][36] Primary Issuance: Overall Issuance Declined Due to Holiday Factors, and Most Issuance Interest Rates Increased - From June 3 to June 6, 2025, the total issuance of corporate credit bonds was 196.5 billion yuan, a month-on-month decrease of 31%, and the total issuance of financial credit bonds was 19 billion yuan, a significant month-on-month decrease of 90%. The total net financing was 49 billion yuan, including a net repayment of 12 billion yuan for urban investment bonds and a net financing of 62.9 billion yuan for industrial bonds. The total net financing of financial credit bonds was 10.3 billion yuan. [3][57] - Affected by holiday factors, the issuance of both corporate and financial credit bonds decreased. In terms of issuance interest rates, the issuance interest rates of medium and short-term notes, except for AAA, showed an upward trend, and the average issuance interest rates of corporate bonds, except for AA+, also showed an upward trend. [3][57] Secondary Trading: Medium and Short-Term Maturities Were Actively Traded, and the Trading of Long-Term Maturities Decreased Slightly - The actively traded entities are mainly medium and high-grade, medium and short-term, and central and local state-owned enterprises. In terms of types, the actively traded entities of urban investment bonds are mainly divided into two categories: one is the mainstream high-grade platforms in economically strong provinces such as Jiangsu and Guangdong; the other is the core main platforms in relatively high-spread areas of large economic provinces (such as Shandong, Chongqing, and Sichuan). The actively traded entities of real estate bonds are still mainly AAA, and the trading maturities are mostly within 1 - 3 years. The actively traded entities of private enterprise bonds are also mainly AAA, and the trading maturities are mostly medium and short-term. [4][67] - Among the actively traded urban investment bonds, the trading volume of bonds with a maturity of over 5 years accounted for 3%, a slight decrease compared with the previous week (4%). [4][67]

Core Views - The report highlights that 2023 is an "atypical" macro year, with significant impacts from Trump's policies on global trade, finance, and geopolitics, leading to a restructuring of the global order [3] - As the market shifts away from US assets, Chinese assets are expected to undergo a revaluation, suggesting a strategic focus on "high odds + left-side emphasis + trading" to navigate uncertainties [3][6] - The report suggests that the weakening dollar may favor non-US assets, with European assets showing higher probabilities of performance, while emerging markets like Hong Kong may offer better odds [3][6] Market Environment - The report identifies three main themes driving asset price performance: global cycle misalignment, AI technology revolution, and global capital reallocation [4] - It notes that the restructuring of global order is altering asset pricing rules, leading to increased volatility and reduced trends across various asset classes [6][13] - The report emphasizes the need for diversified asset allocation strategies in response to changing correlations and the impact of fiscal policies [16] Investment Themes - The report outlines several investment themes for the second half of 2025, including the reconstruction of economic, financial, and geopolitical orders, with a focus on nearshoring and de-dollarization trends [5][17] - It highlights the potential for structural opportunities in regions and industries, particularly in defense, self-sufficiency, and scarce resources due to increased geopolitical uncertainties [5][17] - The report also discusses the implications of a potential stagflation scenario in the US and deflation risks in non-US markets, suggesting a cautious approach to asset allocation [5][24] Asset Pricing - The report indicates that the pricing anchor effect of US Treasuries is weakening due to policy uncertainties and debt issues, leading to a potential revaluation of non-US assets [6][49] - It suggests that the global capital market may see increased diversification as the correlation between US and non-US assets declines [6][49] - The report emphasizes the importance of maintaining flexibility in asset operations and focusing on high odds and low correlation strategies [6][40] Debt Dynamics - The report discusses the implications of the US debt situation, highlighting the challenges posed by high deficits and the potential for a long-term weakening of the dollar [49][53] - It notes that the US government's reliance on short-term debt may create new fiscal stability concerns, particularly as refinancing costs rise [57][58] - The report suggests that the government's approach to managing debt will be a critical factor influencing asset performance in the coming years [59]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No industry investment rating information for the U.S. Treasury bond market is provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Over the past decade, the U.S. Treasury bond market has experienced multiple liquidity events. The vulnerability of the U.S. Treasury bond market stems from changes in the market intermediary system and the investor structure, both of which are long - term influencing factors. This indicates that the current market ecosystem of U.S. Treasury bonds is more fragile than it was a decade ago. If the supply - demand pattern of U.S. Treasury bonds changes unfavorably, such as a short - term concentrated supply or increased market volatility due to policy uncertainties, liquidity risks may re - emerge [3][4]. 3. Summaries Based on Related Contents Market Intermediary System Changes - The market - making system in the secondary market of U.S. Treasury bonds has weakened. Since the 2008 financial crisis, overseas regulations have become stricter. The market - making ability of primary dealers, mostly affiliated with bank - holding companies, is restricted by capital requirements. The enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (eSLR) in 2014 limited the expansion ability of primary dealers' balance sheets and their intermediary business related to Treasury bonds. Compared with the rapid expansion of the U.S. Treasury bond stock, the growth of primary dealers' Treasury bond intermediary business has been slow, and the proportion of their total Treasury bond positions and financing scale in the balance of outstanding Treasury bonds has decreased [3][6]. - Principal Trading Firms (PTFs) that engage in high - frequency trading have emerged and assumed some market - making functions. However, PTFs have small amounts of their own funds, are less regulated, have high leverage, and rarely hold overnight positions. They can only provide intraday liquidity and cannot fully replace traditional dealers [3][6]. Investor Structure Changes - Since 2013, as countries diversify their reserve assets, the proportion of overseas official investors with low price sensitivity in U.S. Treasury bond holdings has declined, while the proportion of mutual funds with leverage and redemption pressure in U.S. Treasury bond holdings has increased. As of Q4 2024, the proportion of broad - based mutual funds (including money market funds and ETFs) in U.S. Treasury bond holdings has risen from about 9% in 2011 to about 19% [3][12]. - Asset management institutions' increasing use of derivatives has led to profitable arbitrage opportunities between U.S. Treasury bond cash and futures, attracting hedge funds to participate in basis trading (long cash bonds and short futures) with high leverage. As of May 2025, hedge funds hold 8 million net short contracts of U.S. Treasury bonds, with a notional risk exposure of over $1 trillion, accounting for about 3.6% of the outstanding U.S. Treasury bonds. In times of high market volatility, these high - leverage and homogeneous basis trades may be forced to close, triggering a liquidity tightening spiral [3][15].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided in the report. 2. Core Views of the Report - Multiple international investment banks have raised their economic growth forecasts for China in 2025, expecting trade competitiveness to support the long - term strength of the RMB. The Chinese market and assets are more attractive to global investors due to positive economic growth expectations, improved corporate profit prospects, and relatively low valuations [3][16]. - In the commodity market, some varieties have shown significant price movements. For example, domestic silver futures have reached a record high, and international oil prices have risen due to multiple factors. There are also changes in the supply and demand of various commodities and policies related to their trade [6][11]. - In the bond market, the central bank's actions have stabilized market expectations, with yields of major interest - rate bonds in the inter - bank market declining, and there are expectations for future market trends such as potential secondary buy - back operations and possible reserve requirement ratio and interest rate cuts in the third quarter [24]. - In the stock market, A - shares are recommended to focus on corporate fundamentals from June to August, and allocate in specific sectors. The Hong Kong stock market is expected to have repair momentum in the long - term. The IPO market in A - shares and the performance of new stocks have shown certain trends, and the market is paying attention to the value re - evaluation of central state - owned enterprises [33]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Macro Data - GDP in Q1 2025 grew at a constant - price quarterly year - on - year rate of 5.4%, the same as the previous quarter and slightly higher than the same period last year. The manufacturing PMI in May 2025 was 49.5%, up from the previous month but the same as the same period last year. Other economic indicators such as inflation, investment, and trade also showed various trends [1]. 3.2 Commodity Investment Reference 3.2.1 Comprehensive - Cast aluminum alloy futures and options will be listed on June 10, 2025. From January to April, the added value of small and medium - sized industrial enterprises above designated size increased by 8.2% year - on - year, with significant growth in equipment and raw material manufacturing. China's foreign exchange reserves reached $3285.3 billion at the end of May, rising for five consecutive months [2]. - Multiple well - known foreign institutions have raised their forecasts for China's economic growth rate and stock index target points. On June 6, 2025, global central banks initiated an interest - rate cut wave, including the European Central Bank, the Reserve Bank of India, and the Central Bank of Russia [3][4][5]. 3.2.2 Metals - Since June, domestic silver futures prices have continued to rise, with the main July contract hitting a record high. China increased its gold reserves in May, with the gold reserve reaching 73.83 million ounces at the end of May, rising for seven consecutive months [6]. 3.2.3 Coal, Coke, Steel, and Minerals - Coking enterprises plan to increase production cuts to 30% to stabilize coke prices. Fitch believes that producers with many facilities in Canada, Mexico, and Europe will be most affected by the tariff increase on steel and aluminum [9]. 3.2.4 Energy and Chemicals - The development project of the Kenli 10 - 2 oilfield group in the Bohai Sea is progressing. International oil prices have risen due to multiple factors. South Korea is considering participating in an LNG project in Alaska, USA [11]. 3.2.5 Agricultural Products - China has allowed the import of Uruguayan soybean meal, rapeseed meal, and Danish barley. Japan is considering releasing reserve rice to deal with high rice prices and shortages. Malaysia's palm oil production in May is estimated to increase by 3.07% [14]. 3.3 Financial News Compilation 3.3.1 Open Market - On June 6, the central bank conducted 135 billion yuan of 7 - day reverse repurchase operations, with a net withdrawal of 156.1 billion yuan on that day. A total of 930.9 billion yuan of reverse repurchases will mature this week [15]. 3.3.2 Key News - Multiple international investment banks have raised their forecasts for China's economic growth rate in 2025. China's foreign exchange reserves and gold reserves increased in May. Infrastructure investment has been positive this year, but the momentum for expanding effective investment needs to be fully released [16][17]. - Many policies and regulations are being promoted, such as the review of rare - earth export control applications, the legislative work plan of the Ministry of Finance, and the public consultation on the management of seriously untrustworthy subject lists [18][19]. 3.3.3 Bond Market Summary - Yields of major interest - rate bonds in the inter - bank market declined, and treasury bond futures rose. The bond ETF market has reached a new high, and the issuance of public funds last week was mainly bond - type funds [24][20]. 3.3.4 Foreign Exchange Market - The on - shore RMB against the US dollar closed at 7.1847 on June 9, down 9 points from the previous trading day. The US dollar index rose 0.47% [29]. 3.3.5 Research Report Highlights - Yangtze River Fixed Income suggests a defensive coupon strategy for credit bonds in mid - and early June. CICC Fixed Income expects the primary supply of asset - backed securities to continue to grow. Guosheng Fixed Income believes that the repurchase operation can stabilize market expectations [30]. 3.4 Stock Market Key News - In the first trading week of June, A - share indexes fluctuated upward. It is recommended to focus on corporate fundamentals from June to August and allocate in specific sectors. The Hong Kong stock market is expected to have repair momentum in the long - term [33]. - Many mainland enterprises have gone public in Hong Kong this year, and the number of new - share subscribers and the success rate in new - share subscriptions have increased. The A - share IPO market showed signs of warming in May [33][34].

Core Viewpoint - The central bank's unprecedented announcement of a large-scale reverse repurchase operation at the beginning of June aims to stabilize market confidence and address liquidity concerns in the interbank certificate of deposit (NCD) market, particularly in light of the significant maturity of NCDs this month [1][2][3]. Group 1: Central Bank Operations - On June 5, the central bank announced a 1 trillion yuan reverse repurchase operation starting June 6, with a term of 3 months, to maintain ample liquidity in the banking system [2]. - This operation is part of a series of reverse repurchase actions that have been ongoing for eight months, aimed at enhancing liquidity management within a year [2][5]. - Analysts believe that the early announcement of this operation is intended to alleviate market anxiety regarding the large NCD maturities, which amount to 4.2 trillion yuan in June, a significant increase from May [2][4]. Group 2: Market Reactions and Trends - Following the central bank's announcement, there are initial signs of a downward trend in NCD issuance rates, with the one-year NCD rate dropping from 1.82% to 1.80% [4]. - The weighted average issuance rate for NCDs was 1.71%, showing a slight increase of 1 basis point compared to the previous period, indicating a stabilization in the banking sector's funding pressures [4][6]. - The upcoming week is critical for observing NCD market performance, with over 1.2 trillion yuan in NCDs maturing, the largest single-week maturity volume on record [8]. Group 3: Future Expectations - Analysts expect that the central bank will continue to use reverse repos and medium-term lending facilities (MLF) as channels for maintaining reasonable liquidity levels [5][10]. - There is a consensus that the central bank's liquidity management will be proactive, especially with the seasonal pressures of government bond issuance and the need for banks to manage their balance sheets effectively [7][9]. - The potential for increased MLF operations in response to maturing reverse repos is anticipated, with a focus on maintaining stability in the liquidity environment [10].

Group 1: Recent Trends in Hong Kong Listings - A surge in mainland companies seeking to list in Hong Kong has been observed, with 8 A-share companies completing IPOs since September last year, raising a total of 981.1 billion HKD [1] - Nearly 50 A-share companies are planning to list in Hong Kong, with over 20 already having submitted materials or received approval [1] - Policy support has been identified as a key factor driving this trend, particularly for technology companies [1][2] Group 2: Regulatory Support and Market Conditions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is committed to promoting high-level capital market openness and supporting technology companies in utilizing both domestic and international markets [2] - The Hong Kong Stock Exchange has optimized its listing system, lowering barriers and introducing mechanisms like "dual-class shares" to facilitate listings for new economy enterprises [2] - The implementation of new regulations for overseas listings has seen 242 mainland companies complete their registration, with 83 being technology firms [3] Group 3: Benefits of Listing in Hong Kong - Listing in Hong Kong allows companies to access global investors, broaden financing channels, and enhance international visibility and brand value [4] - The presence of more mainland companies in Hong Kong is expected to strengthen Hong Kong's position as an international financial center [5] - Hong Kong serves as a gateway for global investors to enter mainland China, benefiting from a diverse product and client ecosystem [6] Group 4: Banking Sector Support - Financial institutions are playing a crucial role in supporting mainland companies in their Hong Kong listing endeavors, providing comprehensive financial consulting and information services [7] - The introduction of the "18C" listing rules has lowered the entry barriers for technology companies, creating dedicated financing channels [7] - Banks are also offering various financial products post-listing to support companies in their growth and strategic initiatives [8]

股票市场对贸易战预期反应趋于理性，而债券市场主要定价流动性而非 贸易战影响，央行政策是关键驱动因素。 未来需密切关注 6 月份出口数据，特别是抢出口效应减弱的迹象，这将 是判断债券市场机会的重要信号。 债券市场的大机会主要来自经济数据催化，尤其是地产数据，地产下行 会放大出口和生产的负面影响。 贸易战对中国债市的影响已部分定价，未来需关注实际影响；美债表现 疲软，反映了增长和流动性预期以及金融秩序重塑。 美元信用资产表现偏弱，与传统避险逻辑不符，反映了金融秩序重塑的 不确定性和对美国财政扩张的担忧。 全球市场中，股票定价贸易规则影响，避险资产如黄金、比特币因对金 融秩序重塑敏感而走强，大宗商品震荡。 预计 2025 年将是 10 年期国债牛市的尾部阶段，下半年基本面定价逻 辑将主导，出口带动地产走低，利率仍有下行空间。 Q&A 当前市场对中美贸易战的预期定价趋势如何？ 当前市场对中美贸易战的预期定价呈现出疲软趋势。最初在四五月份，市场风 险偏好极度收缩，但随着时间推移，市场选择不提前判断贸易规则的不确定性。 因此，从四月下旬到整个五月，相关板块并未获得非常乐观的定价，更加侧重 现实端。尽管上周中美两国首脑会谈 ...

Core Viewpoint - The current international monetary system is undergoing profound changes due to the long-term disorderly expansion of U.S. public debt, the "weaponization" of the dollar during the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and various policy proposals during the Trump 2.0 era, which erode the credibility of the dollar as the world's reserve currency [2]. Group 1: Triffin Dilemma Misinterpretations - The "Triffin Dilemma" has evolved into two versions post-Bretton Woods: one concerning the current account and the other regarding "safe assets," both of which contain significant misunderstandings [4][13]. - Misconceptions include confusing net capital with total capital inflows, mixing "earned" and "borrowed" foreign exchange reserves, and conflating bilateral with multilateral capital flows [17][19][20]. - The supply of dollar liquidity is not necessarily linked to the U.S. current account deficit, as the U.S. maintained a current account surplus for about 30 years after becoming the primary reserve currency [14][21]. Group 2: U.S. Stocks as Safe Assets - Overseas funds have shifted from U.S. Treasury bonds to U.S. stocks, leading to the disappearance of the equity risk premium in the S&P 500, indicating that investors now view U.S. stocks as safe assets [5][23]. - This shift is driven by declining safety perceptions of U.S. debt and the stable long-term growth of U.S. stocks, with significant capital inflows into the U.S. stock market [26][30]. Group 3: U.S. Reserve Currency Status - The U.S. is unlikely to relinquish its status as the world's reserve currency due to the substantial benefits it provides, including the international seigniorage revenue [6][32]. - The unique asset-liability structure of the U.S. allows it to benefit from dollar depreciation, effectively transferring payment burdens globally [36][39]. Group 4: Declining Economic Share vs. Rising Financial Dominance - While the U.S. share of the real economy is declining, its share in international finance is increasing, primarily due to the offshore dollar being the most important financing currency and onshore dollars being viewed as safe assets [7][40][44]. - The expansion of cross-border capital flows has outpaced trade growth, reinforcing the dollar's financial position [46]. Group 5: Dollar Cycles - The dollar exhibits cyclical characteristics influenced by fundamentals, policies, and capital flows, with positive feedback mechanisms amplifying these cycles [8][48][52]. - The dollar's appreciation impacts global economies asymmetrically, benefiting the U.S. while constraining other economies [53]. Group 6: The Dollar's Global Impact - The U.S. often emerges unscathed from global crises, with the adverse effects disproportionately affecting non-U.S. economies due to the asymmetrical impact of U.S. monetary policy [56][58]. - The dollar's status as a reserve currency provides the U.S. with unique advantages, including lower financing costs and the ability to conduct fiscal stimulus without immediate repayment pressures [57]. Group 7: Need for an International Monetary System - The current trend towards a multi-polar world raises questions about the necessity of an international monetary system, with the dollar still playing a central role in global trade and finance [62][63]. - A multi-currency system may be preferable to a non-system, as it allows for currency competition and provides space for emerging currencies like the renminbi [64]. Group 8: Transitioning to a Multi-Currency System - Transitioning from a dollar-centric system to a multi-currency system requires policy coordination among major currency issuers and flexible exchange rate arrangements [11][65].

央行新增信息披露态度呵护 隔夜利率逼近 1.4% —— 流动性与机构行为周度跟踪 250608 [[Table_R Table_Report eportTTime ime]] 2025 年 6 月 8 日 请阅读最后一页免责声明及信息披露 http://www.cindasc.com 1 歌声ue 证券研究报告 债券研究 [Table_ReportType] 专题报告 联系电话：+86 18817583889 邮 箱： liyishuang@cindasc.com [➢Table_Summary] 货币市场：本周央行 OMO 净回笼 6717 亿，周五买断式逆回购招标 10000 亿。 尽管本周初企业所得税汇算清缴走款带来了一定扰动，逆回购整体维持净回 笼，但资金面整体仍维持宽松，周五买断式逆回购落地，DR007 降至 1.53%。 ➢ 质押式回购成交量在周四升至 7.86 万亿的年内新高后小幅回落，全周日均 成交上升 1.0 万亿至 7.50 万亿；质押式回购整体规模同样在周四创下 1 月 以来的新高后回落，但仍明显高于上周。各类银行净融出上半周均有所抬升， 下半周股份行与城商行净融出回落，大行净融出升破 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - This week, the bond market had little overall fluctuation. After large - scale banks started buying short - term bonds and the central bank announced the outright reverse repurchase in June, the bond market sentiment heated up, and the yield curve steepened. The 1Y Treasury yield dropped about 5bp to 1.41%, and the 10Y Treasury yield dropped 2bp to 1.65% [2][11]. - There are three details worthy of attention in this week's institutional behavior and capital situation: large - scale banks' bond purchases are not concentrated on the short - end; there is a structural differentiation in banks' capital lending; short - term certificates of deposit may be more cost - effective [2][12]. - The short - term market may be more driven by sentiment. Three variables need to be concerned about in the future: the sustainability of large - scale banks' bond purchases, the capital market fluctuations in June under the lending stratification, and the benefits to certificates of deposit from increased institutional behavior [4][14]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 This Week's Institutional Behavior Review: Three Details of Large - Scale Banks Buying Short - Term Bonds 3.1.1 Yield Curve - Treasury and China Development Bank (CDB) bond yields generally declined. For Treasury bonds, the 1Y yield dropped 5bp, the 3Y yield dropped 4bp, the 5Y yield dropped 2bp, the 7Y yield dropped 3bp, the 10Y yield dropped 2bp, the 15Y yield dropped 2bp, and the 30Y yield dropped 2bp. For CDB bonds, the 1Y yield dropped 3bp, the 3Y yield dropped 3bp, the 5Y yield dropped 3bp, the 7Y yield dropped 2bp, the 10Y yield dropped 1bp, the 15Y yield dropped 1bp, and the 30Y yield dropped 2bp [14][15]. 3.1.2 Term Spread - For Treasury bonds, the spread trend was differentiated, with the short - term spread narrowing and the long - term spread widening. For CDB bonds, the spread inversion eased, and the medium - term spread widened. The long - and medium - term spreads between Treasury and CDB bonds widened [18][19]. 3.2 Bond Market Leverage and Capital Situation 3.2.1 Leverage Ratio - From June 3 to June 6, 2025, the leverage ratio fluctuated and rose. As of June 6, the leverage ratio was about 107.14%, up 0.36pct from last Friday and down 0.02pct from this Tuesday [22]. 3.2.2 Average Daily Turnover of Pledged Repurchase - The average daily turnover of pledged repurchase increased compared with last week. From June 3 to June 6, the average daily turnover of pledged repurchase was about 7.5 trillion yuan, up 1.0 trillion yuan from last week. The average overnight turnover accounted for 87.48%, up 3.61pct [29][30]. 3.2.3 Capital Situation - From June 3 to June 6, the capital lending of banks first rose and then fell. The net lending of large - scale and policy banks was 4.25 trillion yuan on June 6. The main capital borrowers were funds, and the lending of money market funds fluctuated and declined. DR007 fluctuated and declined, and R007 continued to decline [34]. 3.3 Duration of Medium - and Long - Term Bond Funds 3.3.1 Median Duration Dropped to 2.76 Years - This week (June 3 - June 6), the median duration of medium - and long - term bond funds was 2.76 years (de - leveraged) and 2.96 years (leveraged). On June 6, the median duration (de - leveraged) was 2.76 years, down 0.01 years from last Friday [45]. 3.3.2 Duration of Interest - Rate Bond Funds Dropped to 3.67 Years - The median duration (leveraged) of interest - rate bond funds dropped to 3.67 years, down 0.16 years from last Friday; the median duration (leveraged) of credit - bond funds rose to 2.71 years, down 0.02 years from last Friday [48]. 3.4 Comparison of Category Strategies 3.4.1 Sino - US Yield Spread - The overall inversion of the Sino - US Treasury yield spread deepened. The 1Y spread inversion deepened 8bp, the 2Y spread inversion deepened 17bp, the 3Y and 5Y spread inversions deepened 19bp, the 7Y spread inversion deepened 16bp, the 10Y spread inversion deepened 12bp, and the 30Y spread inversion deepened 7bp [54]. 3.4.2 Implied Tax Rate - As of June 6, the 1Y and 3Y spreads between CDB and Treasury bonds widened, the 5Y and 15Y spreads narrowed, and the 7Y spread widened, while the 10Y and 30Y spreads changed less than 1bp [55]. 3.5 Changes in Bond Lending Balance - On June 6, the lending concentration of the active 10Y Treasury and 10Y CDB bonds increased, while that of the less - active 10Y Treasury, less - active 10Y CDB, and active 30Y Treasury bonds decreased. Among institutions, only the lending balance of small - and medium - sized banks decreased, while the others increased [56].