Core Viewpoint - The ongoing public dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xibei Yomiancun highlights consumer concerns regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes in restaurants and the need for transparency in food sourcing and preparation methods [3][8][10] Group 1: Events and Reactions - Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei Yomiancun for allegedly serving expensive pre-prepared dishes during a recent visit, prompting a public outcry and a response from Xibei's founder, who announced plans to sue Luo for damaging the brand's reputation [3][6] - Xibei's management revealed Luo's dining bill, which totaled 785 yuan for 15 dishes, and asserted that all dishes are freshly prepared in-store, with only pre-processed ingredients provided by a central kitchen [3][6] - In response to the controversy, Xibei launched a "Luo Yonghao Menu" and offered a money-back guarantee if customers were dissatisfied, alongside an open kitchen policy [3][6] Group 2: Industry Context and Regulations - The incident has sparked broader public interest in the regulatory framework surrounding the pre-prepared food industry, with recent guidelines issued by multiple government departments defining pre-prepared dishes and clarifying what does not fall under this category [6][8] - The guidelines specify that dishes made in central kitchens do not qualify as pre-prepared food, which has implications for how restaurants like Xibei can market their offerings [6][8] - There is a disconnect between official definitions of pre-prepared food and consumer perceptions, leading to confusion and potential reputational risks for restaurants that may use pre-prepared ingredients [8][10]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Xibei and Luo Yonghao centers around accusations of Xibei using pre-prepared dishes, with Luo claiming that Xibei's assertion of serving 100% fresh dishes is misleading [1][2][3] Group 1: Company Response - Xibei issued a public letter on September 12, denying Luo's accusations and asserting that the dishes he consumed do not fall under the category of pre-prepared food [1][2][15] - Xibei's CEO, Jia Guolong, stated that the company experienced a significant drop in daily revenue, with losses of 1 million yuan on September 10 and 11, and an expected loss of 2 to 3 million yuan on September 12 [2][15] - Xibei plans to open its kitchen to the public and provide transparency regarding the sourcing of its ingredients [18] Group 2: Luo Yonghao's Claims - Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei's pricing and quality, claiming that many dishes are pre-prepared and that the restaurant's prices are excessively high compared to other establishments [14][18] - During a live broadcast, Luo showcased various dishes from Xibei, highlighting their long shelf lives and questioning the freshness of the food served [5][8][14] - Luo emphasized the need for clearer regulations regarding pre-prepared food in restaurants, arguing that consumers deserve to know the preparation methods used [8][9] Group 3: Industry Context - The controversy has sparked widespread discussion on social media, with Luo's comments leading to significant public engagement, including nearly 100,000 viewers during his live stream [5][9] - According to a report by the China Chain Store & Franchise Association, over 80% of dishes in certain chain restaurants, including Xibei, are pre-prepared [9][11] - The lack of a formal national standard for defining pre-prepared food has contributed to the confusion and debate surrounding the issue [8][11]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing controversy surrounding Luo Yonghao's criticism of XIBEI's use of pre-prepared dishes has led to public discussions about food transparency and consumer rights in the restaurant industry [1][4]. Group 1: Company Response - XIBEI issued a letter to customers clarifying that the dishes Luo Yonghao consumed do not fall under the definition of "pre-prepared dishes" as outlined by the six ministries in their recent notification [1][3]. - XIBEI expressed gratitude to Luo Yonghao for dining at their establishment but firmly opposed his claims, stating that they are unfounded and damaging to the brand's reputation [3][4]. - The company provided a detailed "operational guideline" for the preparation of the 13 dishes Luo ordered, emphasizing their commitment to food safety and quality [3]. Group 2: Luo Yonghao's Position - Luo Yonghao clarified in a live stream that he does not oppose pre-prepared dishes but advocates for transparency regarding their use in restaurants, emphasizing consumers' right to know whether dishes are freshly made or pre-prepared [4][5]. - He highlighted specific examples of pre-prepared items found in XIBEI's kitchen, questioning the integrity of the restaurant's claims about their food preparation practices [5][6]. - Luo referenced a report indicating that a significant percentage of major restaurant chains in China, including XIBEI, utilize pre-prepared dishes, suggesting that the industry lacks clear standards [5][8]. Group 3: Industry Insights - The China Chain Store and Franchise Association provided insights into the definition and scope of pre-prepared dishes, clarifying that items produced in central kitchens for specific restaurant chains do not qualify as pre-prepared dishes under current regulations [8][9]. - The association emphasized the importance of food safety and quality standards in the production of semi-finished and finished dishes, which are prepared on-site by restaurant chefs [9][10]. - There is an ongoing effort to establish national standards for pre-prepared dishes, with the health commission leading the initiative to solicit public opinions on these standards [10].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the recent controversies involving various companies, including Xibei and Neta Auto, highlighting their operational challenges and responses to public criticism [3][6]. - Xibei has launched a "Luo Yonghao Set Menu" consisting of 13 dishes, allowing customers to customize their orders and visit the kitchen, in response to accusations from Luo Yonghao regarding their food preparation methods [3]. - Neta Auto's financial situation is dire, with only approximately 15.5 million yuan in cash and confirmed debts of around 5.1 billion yuan, indicating significant financial distress [6]. Group 2 - Luo Yonghao expressed his support for fresh cooking methods in restaurants, promoting two Hunan cuisine chains that operate profitably in shopping malls, emphasizing transparency in the pre-prepared food market [6][8]. - The late designer Giorgio Armani's will indicates a shift towards selling shares of his fashion empire, with plans for an IPO or sale to luxury giants, marking a significant change in the company's future direction [8]. - Apple has updated its website to indicate that the iPhone Air will only support eSIM, with major Chinese telecom operators set to provide support, reflecting a shift in mobile technology [10]. Group 3 - Xiaomi's CEO highlighted the importance of their home appliance segment, which is crucial for the company's high-end strategy, suggesting a competitive landscape in the home electronics market [11]. - The automotive sector is seeing significant developments, with companies like Zhi Mi Auto completing their first round of financing and planning new factory locations near Tesla's Berlin plant [13]. - Rivian is recalling over 24,000 electric vehicles due to software issues, showcasing ongoing challenges in the electric vehicle industry related to technology reliability [16]. Group 4 - WeChat is optimizing its AI search capabilities, currently in a testing phase, which could enhance user experience and engagement on the platform [19]. - Honor has announced a new trademark "Night God," focusing on advanced imaging technology for night photography, indicating a strategic move in the smartphone market [21]. - The introduction of AI-driven products by companies like Meituan and Xiaomi reflects a growing trend towards integrating AI into everyday consumer services, enhancing user interaction and service efficiency [22][25].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Luo Yonghao and the well-known restaurant chain Xibei centers around accusations of using pre-prepared dishes, with Luo claiming that most of the dishes he consumed were pre-prepared and overpriced, while Xibei's CEO asserts that no pre-prepared dishes were served [1][3][4]. Group 1: Dispute Background - Luo Yonghao publicly criticized Xibei on September 10, stating that his meal consisted mostly of pre-prepared dishes and called for legislation requiring restaurants to disclose the use of such dishes [3][4]. - Xibei's CEO, Jia Guolong, responded by stating that a review of the meal showed no pre-prepared dishes were served and announced plans to sue Luo for damaging the brand's reputation [4][11]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Context - The definition of pre-prepared dishes is a key issue, with current standards indicating that only factory-made, packaged foods with labels and shelf lives qualify as pre-prepared, while semi-finished products made in central kitchens do not [1][7]. - Experts note that there is currently no national standard for pre-prepared dishes, but a forthcoming regulation in March 2024 will clarify definitions and safety standards for the industry [7][8]. Group 3: Consumer Rights and Responsibilities - Consumers, including influential public figures like Luo, have the right to express their dining experiences, but they also bear a higher duty of care in their statements [11][12]. - If Xibei pursues legal action, it must provide evidence that Luo's statements caused reputational harm, while Luo could counter with proof of his claims regarding pre-prepared dishes [12][11]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The dispute highlights a broader need for transparency in the pre-prepared food sector, with calls for clearer labeling and definitions to bridge the gap between consumer perceptions and industry practices [12][10]. - The attention surrounding this case may lead to increased regulatory scrutiny and potential legislative changes in the pre-prepared food industry, benefiting consumer rights and safety [12][11].

Group 1 - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, announced plans to sue Luo Yonghao over allegations of using pre-made dishes, while Luo offered a reward for evidence supporting his claims [2][3] - Xibei confirmed that some dishes may be prepared in advance, with the chef stating that lamb chops can be served up to three meals after cooking [2][3] Group 2 - A court ruled that the parents of two teenagers involved in a public urination incident at a Haidilao restaurant must pay a total of 2.2 million yuan in damages [3][4] - The compensation includes 130,000 yuan for cleaning and damages, and 2 million yuan for business losses and reputation damage [3][4] Group 3 - Apple delayed the launch of the iPhone Air in China due to regulatory issues related to its eSIM technology, with all models pending approval [4][5] - Major Chinese telecom operators will support the iPhone Air with eSIM services once regulatory approval is obtained [4][5] Group 4 - Nio's M9 interior design was leaked by a man who was later ordered to pay 250,000 yuan in damages for infringing on trade secrets [5][6] - The court found that the man's actions diminished consumer interest and disrupted marketing strategies for the new vehicle [5][6] Group 5 - Ant Group introduced a new "pay for performance" model for its enterprise AI services, allowing clients to pay based on the actual results achieved [6] - This model aims to reduce upfront costs for businesses, particularly benefiting small and medium enterprises [6] Group 6 - China Resources Land denied rumors of an intention to acquire Evergrande Property, stating that such information is untrue [7] - Evergrande Property had previously announced a trading suspension pending the release of insider information [7] Group 7 - Shanghai Disneyland responded to complaints about the high price of sanitary products, reducing the price of a pack of five sanitary pads from 150 yuan to 70 yuan [7][8] Group 8 - Wumart Supermarket announced plans to open 20 newly renovated stores by the end of September, as part of its strategy to enhance customer experience [8] Group 9 - Tencent refuted claims regarding a former OpenAI researcher's salary exceeding 100 million yuan upon joining the company [9] Group 10 - Gold prices reached a new record high of $3,674.27 per ounce, surpassing the inflation-adjusted peak from 1980 [10] - The price increase reflects a nearly 40% rise this year, highlighting gold's status as a safe-haven asset amid macroeconomic uncertainties [10] Group 11 - The China Securities Regulatory Commission announced penalties against Beijing Dongtong Technology for serious financial fraud, proposing fines totaling 229 million yuan [10] - The company faces potential delisting due to significant violations of securities laws [10] Group 12 - Dazhonghua's operations remain unaffected despite the investigation of a senior executive for alleged misconduct [11] - The company emphasized its commitment to legal compliance and maintaining operational efficiency [11] Group 13 - Xiamen Hengkang New Materials Technology received approval for its initial public offering on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [12] - Figure Technology became the first platform focused on real-world assets to list on NASDAQ [12] Group 14 - Albania appointed an AI named "Diera" as a government minister, marking a global first for AI in a governmental role [13] - The AI will oversee public procurement processes to ensure transparency and reduce corruption [13] Group 15 - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission initiated an investigation into AI chatbots from seven companies, including Meta and OpenAI, to assess their impact on children [14] Group 16 - Chasing Car completed its first round of financing and is planning to establish a factory near Tesla's German facility [15]

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the pre-prepared dishes of the restaurant chain "Xibei" has gained significant attention, particularly following a live broadcast by Luo Yonghao, who criticized Xibei's marketing and public relations efforts while advocating for transparency in the pre-prepared food industry [1][4][6]. Group 1: Luo Yonghao's Live Broadcast - Luo Yonghao's live broadcast attracted over 100,000 viewers within the first 10 minutes and nearly 5 million views on Weibo by the end of the session [1]. - He criticized Xibei's public relations team for their lack of professionalism and highlighted the importance of consumer awareness regarding pre-prepared dishes [4]. - Luo emphasized that while he supports the concept of pre-prepared dishes, he opposes selling them at prices equivalent to freshly made meals [4][6]. Group 2: Xibei's Response - In response to Luo's accusations, Xibei issued an open letter claiming that his statements were untrue and provided detailed production processes for 13 dishes to clarify their preparation methods [8]. - Xibei announced plans to allow customers to tour their kitchens and production facilities to enhance transparency and consumer trust [8]. Group 3: Definition and Regulation of Pre-prepared Dishes - The definition of pre-prepared dishes has been clarified by regulatory authorities, stating that they must not contain preservatives and should be pre-processed for safe consumption [11][12]. - The distinction between pre-prepared dishes and pre-processing was emphasized, with the latter referring to the preparation of raw ingredients rather than finished products [12].

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that Luo Yonghao will ultimately win against Xibei, despite Xibei potentially winning the lawsuit, as the brand may suffer irreparable damage due to public sentiment and perception of pre-made dishes [3][4]. Group 1: Public Sentiment and Brand Perception - The article highlights that in internet communication, personal stance and emotions often outweigh facts, leading to differing conclusions about whether Xibei's dishes are pre-made [3][4]. - Social media platforms are witnessing intense debates, with many consumers equating any dish not prepared on-site as pre-made, which could negatively impact large chain restaurants [4][6]. - Xibei's defense, citing a government document that distinguishes their dishes from pre-made ones, is deemed ineffective due to existing consumer distrust regarding food safety [6][12]. Group 2: Implications for the Restaurant Industry - The article emphasizes that the downfall of a reputable chain like Xibei would not improve the dining environment; rather, it could lead to worse conditions for consumers [11][12]. - A well-established brand provides job stability and better service quality, which smaller establishments may not guarantee [11][12]. Group 3: Xibei's Strategic Errors - Xibei's aggressive public relations strategies, including revealing Luo Yonghao's menu and pursuing legal action, are criticized as unwise moves that reinforce their position as the dominant party in the dispute [15][16]. - The article suggests that Xibei should have adopted a more conciliatory approach, acknowledging public sentiment rather than escalating the conflict [16][18]. Group 4: The Nature of Pre-made Dishes - The article argues that using pre-made dishes is not inherently wrong; rather, the issue lies in the perception and communication of their use by brands [20][22]. - It is noted that pre-made dishes can enhance efficiency and maintain quality, especially when produced by larger companies with stricter safety standards [20][22]. Group 5: Recommendations for Xibei - The article advises Xibei to embrace transparency and openness in their communications to counter negative public sentiment, rather than attempting to prove their innocence [22][24]. - Engaging with consumers through live demonstrations and addressing their concerns directly could help mitigate the backlash [22][24].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the restaurant chain Xibei and its use of overnight dishes has sparked significant public debate, particularly following comments made by public figure Luo Yonghao regarding the quality and preparation of the food served [2][5][8]. Group 1: Company Response - Xibei acknowledged that some dishes may be prepared in advance and served the next day, asserting that this practice does not compromise food quality [2][5]. - Following Luo Yonghao's criticisms, Xibei released a detailed letter to customers, defending its practices and providing a 42-page document outlining the preparation processes for the dishes in question [5][8]. - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, stated that none of the dishes served in their restaurants are classified as pre-prepared meals, and the company plans to open its kitchens to the public for transparency [10][27]. Group 2: Public and Legal Reactions - Luo Yonghao's comments led to a backlash, with legal experts suggesting that if he can substantiate his claims about Xibei's use of pre-prepared meals, it may not constitute defamation [9][10]. - The public has expressed confusion over the definition of pre-prepared meals, with some consumers concerned about the quality and pricing of such dishes [11][13]. - The controversy has highlighted a broader issue regarding consumer rights and the need for transparency in the food industry, particularly concerning the use of pre-prepared ingredients [28][29]. Group 3: Industry Context - The definition of pre-prepared meals was officially established in March 2024 by six government departments, clarifying what constitutes such meals and emphasizing the importance of food safety [16][17]. - The industry is facing challenges related to public perception of pre-prepared meals, with many consumers associating them with lower quality despite their potential benefits in terms of efficiency and safety [15][28]. - The ongoing debate reflects a growing demand for transparency in the food service industry, as consumers increasingly seek to understand the origins and preparation methods of their meals [29].

此前的9月10日，罗永浩发博公开吐槽连锁餐饮品牌西贝："好久没吃西贝了，今天下飞机跟 同事吃了一顿，发现几乎全都是预制菜，还那么贵。希望国家尽早推动立法，强制饭馆注明 是否用了预制菜。" 9月12日晚，罗永浩在社交媒体开直播谈西贝事件。背景大屏写着"不反对预制菜 推动预制菜 透明化 维护消费者知情权"。 西贝在最新发布的微博中，复盘了门店菜品出品和服务的过程，并对所涉及菜品的生产制作 流程进行一一拆解确认。最终表示，罗永浩在微博中对西贝的指责不实。针对所涉菜品在门 店端的实际制作方式，西贝还将13道菜品具体制作过程的"作业指导书"正式向全社会公布。 来源：中国新闻网综合自澎湃新闻、@中国蓝新闻、@ 西贝XIBEI官方微博等 9月12日下午，西贝官方微博发布消息称，"作为西贝的老客人，首先感谢罗永浩前来西贝就 餐，并为西贝提出意见、建议。但作为有影响力的公众人物，罗永浩对西贝的不实指责及不 当用语，我们坚决反对，绝不姑息。" 按西贝的说法，13道菜品制作过程的描述，均基于西贝门店真实的现场加工行为，同时对齐 国家标准。2024年3月18日市场监管总局、教育部、工业和信息化部、农业农村部、商务 部、国家卫生健康委 ...