2026年开局，股债市场上演"冰与火之歌"。 一边是上证指数连阳突破4000点，剑指4100点大关；另一边则是债市迎头撞上"逆风"。在此背景下，超 四成债基开年即出现回撤，中长期纯债型产品成为调整"重灾区"，多只产品年内跌幅超1%；与之相 对，可转债基金表现亮眼，部分产品同期回报已超6%。 市场波动引发资金敏感流动，短短数日，至少有20家基金公司旗下债基因大额赎回被迫提升净值精度， 债券ETF也一改去年巨额流入的态势，出现显著资金外流，超567亿元资金从中撤离。 金鹰基金固定收益研究部人士对第一财经表示，年初债市或有调整压力，但资金面预期长期向好，机构 年度配置逐步展开，中等久期债券性价比或仍存，后续需重点关注银行、保险、理财配置情况。 摩根士丹利基金固定收益投资部联席总监吴慧文告诉第一财经，2026年债市核心运行逻辑将围绕对基本 面和通胀强预期和弱现实之前的差距放大和收敛展开，预计市场呈现宽幅震荡、利率中枢温和抬升的特 征。 债市开年再吹逆风 开年以来，A股市场延续此前强势，上证指数连阳多日突破4000点，并一度逼近4100点。截至1月8日收 盘，上证指数报收4082.98点，年内累计上涨2.88%。与之形 ...

01 市场洞察 宏观经济企稳修复， 股债表现分化 12月，反映国内经济先行指标的制造业PMI录得50.1%，在11月份49.2%的基础上回升了0.9个 百分点。生产指数、新订单指数和原材料库存指数等多个分项环比上升，带动制造业PMI时隔8 个月再次回到扩张区间。11月CPI同比上涨0.7%，PPI同比下降2.2%。相比于10月份CPI和PPI 同比分别上升0.2%和下降2.1%而言，食品价格由降转涨带动CPI涨幅上升，而PPI同比降幅扩 大主要是受到生活资料降幅走阔的影响 。 12月，政治局会议和中央经济工作会议继续延续稳中求进定调，明确稳市场、强创新的核心导 向，内需提振、科技创新和绿色转型等相关领域的红利政策加速释放，有效提振市场风险偏 好，为股市上行注入强劲动力。中下旬，险资在权益投资风险因子下调政策推动下加速通过 ETF基金布局权益投资，银行理财子等机构同步跟进；这类中长期资金的持续净流入，叠加北 向资金加仓、"国家队" 护盘等因素，共同支撑大盘整体韧性。资金面改善叠加产业政策红利释 放，也让AI和商业航天相关板块在政策利好催化业绩预期的带动下表现活跃，年底上证指数以 11天连阳收官。从投资侧来看，主 ...

作者：烟雨 导语：在当下复杂多变的市场环境中，可转债因其"股债双性"的独特优势，成为投资者平衡风险与收益的重 要工具。招商安本增利债券（217008）以其独特的策略优势脱颖而出。 一、优质可转债基金的筛选标准 可转债基金通过专业化管理，为投资者提供了参与这一市场的便捷途径。优秀的可转债基金首先需要策略 清晰透明。可转债基金有明确的可转债投资策略，包括仓位管理、评级偏好、转股溢价率控制等；其次是 风控体系需要完善，有设置严格的下行保护机制，需要控制回撤幅度。由于纯粹的可转债基金合同约束需 要转债配置不低于80%，再遇到转债对应的正股大幅波动时高仓位的可转债基金相对难以控制回撤，所以采 取"固收+"增强策略，将可转债作为重要增强工具的基金再组合管理和风险控制层面相对更优。例如招商安 本增利债券（217008）的可转债配置区间主要在20%-4%区间，回撤相对可控。管理团队方面，基金经理需 要具备丰富的可转债研究和投资经验。同时基金规模需要适度，避免规模过大影响策略灵活性。 二、重点可转债基金分析与比较 | 基金名称 | 基金代码 | 可转债投资特点 | 风险收益特征 | 适合投资者 类型 | | --- | --- ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report - The bond market continued to recover last week, with yields on various tenors generally declining. The bullish sentiment in the bond market has rebounded, but the space for further capital gains may be limited. A neutral and oscillatory mindset is advisable [3]. - The yields of money market funds have been continuously declining, and multiple money market funds have imposed purchase restrictions [4][13]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalog 3.1. Pan-fixed-income Market Review and Observation 3.1.1. Bond Market Performance - Last week (December 15 - December 19, 2025), the 1-year, 10-year, and 30-year Treasury yields decreased by 3.32BP, 0.88BP, and 2.35BP to 1.35%, 1.83%, and 2.23% respectively. The bullish sentiment in the bond market has recovered [3]. - US Treasury yields declined across the board last week. The 1-year, 2-year, and 10-year US Treasury yields decreased by 3BP, 4BP, and 3BP to 3.51%, 3.48%, and 4.16% respectively [12]. 3.1.2. REITs Market Performance - Last week, the CSI REITs Total Return Index fell 2.85% to 999.19 points. The highway and rental housing sectors led the decline. In the primary market, 4 new public REITs made progress last week [12]. 3.2. Public Fund Market Dynamics - The yields of money market funds have been continuously declining. As of December 16, the median seven-day annualized yield of money market funds was 1.24%, and over a hundred funds had a yield of less than 1%. Multiple funds have announced short-term purchase restrictions [4][13]. 3.3. Pan-fixed-income Fund Index Performance Tracking 3.3.1. Overall Performance | Index Classification | Weekly Return | Cumulative Return Since Inception | | --- | --- | --- | | Money Enhancement Index | 0.03% | 4.43% | | Short-term Bond Fund Selection | 0.04% | 4.57% | | Medium- and Long-term Bond Fund Selection | 0.08% | 6.77% | | Low-volatility Fixed-income + Fund Selection | 0.22% | 4.49% | | Medium-volatility Fixed-income + Fund Selection | 0.12% | 6.25% | | High-volatility Fixed-income + Fund Selection | 0.13% | 8.00% | | Convertible Bond Fund Selection | 0.01% | 22.42% | | QDII Bond Fund Selection | 0.05% | 10.05% | | REITs Fund Selection | -2.22% | 29.35% | [6] 3.3.2. Index Positioning - **Money Enhancement Strategy Index**: Aims for liquidity management, targeting a curve that outperforms money market funds. It mainly invests in money market funds and interbank certificate of deposit index funds. The performance benchmark is the CSI Money Market Fund Index [15]. - **Short-term Bond Fund Selection Index**: Focuses on liquidity management, aiming for a smooth curve with controlled drawdowns. It selects 5 funds with stable long-term returns, strict drawdown control, and significant absolute return capabilities. The performance benchmark is 50% * Short-term Pure Bond Fund Index + 50% * General Money Market Fund Index [18]. - **Medium- and Long-term Bond Fund Selection Index**: Seeks stable returns by investing in medium- and long-term pure bond funds. It aims for excess returns relative to the medium- and long-term bond fund index and a steady upward net value curve. It adjusts the duration and the ratio of credit bond funds to interest rate bond funds according to market conditions [20]. - **Low-volatility Fixed-income + Selection Index**: The equity center is set at 10%. It selects 10 fixed-income + funds with an equity position of less than 15% in the past three years and recently. The performance benchmark is 10% * CSI 800 Index + 90% * ChinaBond New Composite Full Price Index [22]. - **Medium-volatility Fixed-income + Selection Index**: The equity center is set at 20%. It selects 5 fixed-income + funds with an equity position between 15% - 25% in the past three years and recently. The performance benchmark is 20% * CSI 800 Index + 80% * ChinaBond New Composite Full Price Index [26]. - **High-volatility Fixed-income + Selection Index**: The equity center is set at 30%. It selects 5 fixed-income + funds with an equity position between 25% - 35% in the past three years and recently. The performance benchmark is 30% * CSI 800 Index + 70% * ChinaBond New Composite Full Price Index [27]. - **Convertible Bond Fund Selection Index**: Selects 5 bond funds with a high proportion of convertible bond investments. It constructs an evaluation system from multiple dimensions to select the best funds [31]. - **QDII Bond Fund Selection Index**: The underlying assets are overseas bonds. It selects 6 funds with stable returns and good risk control [34]. - **REITs Fund Selection Index**: The underlying assets are high-quality infrastructure projects. It selects 10 funds with stable operations, reasonable valuations, and certain elasticity [35].

哈喽，大家好，我是小睿就来拆解稳健理财的关键：纯债与"固收+"基金怎么选？ 2025年以来，资本市场呈现"债弱股强"的分化格局：开年超半数纯债基金收益告负，部分产品回撤超 1%，打破了"稳稳的幸福"的固有认知。 而"固收+"基金却逆势崛起，三季度单季度份额净增超3500亿份，成为居民理财升级的热门选择。 面对复杂的市场环境，投资者既渴望规避波动，又想追求超越纯债的收益弹性，纯债基金与"固收+"基 金的选择难题愈发突出。 稳健型投资的"三驾马车"纯债基金、"固收+"基金、可转债基金，在2025年的市场环境下呈现差异化表 现。 纯债基金因债市调整承压，截至2025年2月18日，全市场超1200只纯债基金今年以来收益为负，平均收 益率仅-0.03%，资金面偏紧、政策预期修正成为主要拖累因素。 "固收+"基金凭借"债券底仓+权益增强"的策略优势，在股市回暖背景下实现收益突围，三季度合计盈利 389.28亿元，易方达、景顺长城等头部机构产品规模突破千亿。 三大核心维度，解锁稳健基金挑选密码 卡玛比率（年化收益率/最大回撤）是关键指标，业内普遍认为该比率超过2即属高性价比水平，如工银 双玺6个月持有期债券A近一年卡玛比率 ...

Group 1: Report Overview - The report analyzes the holder structure of bond funds and estimates the potential scale of customized bond funds [2][8] Group 2: Investment Rating - No industry investment rating is provided in the report Group 3: Core View - Bond funds are dominated by institutional investors, and institutions generally hold a dominant position in various sub - categories, except for short - term bond funds where institutional and individual forces are relatively balanced. The specific definition and recognition criteria of customized funds need further regulatory clarification [15] Group 4: Overall Holder Structure - As of the end of June 2025, the institutional holding ratio of bond funds reached 82.8%. Assuming the ratio remained unchanged, as of the end of September, institutional investors held bond funds worth 8.9 trillion yuan, and individual investors held 1.9 trillion yuan [4][8] - Regarding the types of holding institutions, the estimated scale of bond funds held by bank self - operation is between 4.6 - 6.5 trillion yuan, by wealth management is between 1.0 - 1.3 trillion yuan, and by insurance funds is between 0.7 - 1.7 trillion yuan. However, the estimation method has limitations [9][10][11] - In terms of different sub - fund varieties, as of the end of June 2025, the institutional holding ratios of medium - long - term bond funds and passive index bond funds were 92% and 86% respectively; the institutional holding ratios of convertible bond funds, first - class bond funds, and second - class bond funds were 82%, 61%, and 68% respectively; the institutional holding ratio of short - term bond funds was 55%. The actual institutional holding ratio may be higher in non - quarter - end periods [12][13] Group 5: Potential Scale of Customized Bond Funds - As of the end of September 2025, from the perspective of a single investor, bond funds worth 2.5 trillion yuan had a single - institutional holding ratio exceeding 50%, and if only initiator funds were considered, the scale was 1.3 trillion yuan. Considering only institutional nature, bond funds worth 8.7 trillion yuan had the total institutional investor holding ratio exceeding 50% [14]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of diversifying investments across different asset classes, including both RMB and foreign currency assets, as well as stocks and bonds [2] - It introduces a free course that systematically covers investment knowledge related to US dollar bond funds, indicating a growing interest in this area among investors [2] - The article highlights the rapid growth of "fixed income +" products in recent years, driven by declining deposit rates and increasing investor attention [7] Group 2 - "Fixed income +" funds typically add a small amount of stocks or convertible bonds to a pure bond base, leveraging the negative correlation between stocks and bonds to achieve stable returns while reducing volatility risk [5] - Traditional "fixed income +" products include primary bond funds, secondary bond funds, and mixed bond funds, with secondary bond funds and mixed bond funds being the most classic types [5] - The broader category of "fixed income +" also encompasses hedge funds and all-weather strategy funds, which may not hold a high proportion of bonds but use strategies to control volatility risk [5][7]

Core Insights - The performance of convertible bond funds has significantly outperformed other investment products in the capital market, with the "Southern Changyuan Convertible Bond A" fund leading with a return of 38.09% this year [2] - Convertible bond funds have become the dominant players in the bond fund market, occupying 6 out of the top 30 positions in terms of returns, and accounting for 19 out of the top 30 funds overall [2] - Private equity convertible bond funds have also shown impressive performance, with some achieving annualized returns exceeding 70% without any negative returns reported [2] Group 1: Performance Analysis - The average net value growth rate of convertible bond funds has surpassed 20% this year, significantly higher than the overall bond fund average of 2.13% [6] - Among the top 50 bond funds, 29 positions are held by convertible bond funds, showcasing their dual investment advantages in both equity and debt [6] - The convertible bond market has seen a 41% increase in fund size in the third quarter, reaching 133.4 billion yuan [4] Group 2: Market Dynamics - The "strong stock, stable bond" market environment has provided an ideal backdrop for convertible bonds, with the stock market's upward momentum driving the rebound of convertible bonds [5] - The characteristics of convertible bonds, which offer downside protection and unlimited upside potential, make them particularly attractive during market volatility [5] - The acceleration of forced redemptions in the convertible bond market has created opportunities for active strategies, allowing investors to capitalize on predictable outcomes [9] Group 3: Investment Strategies - Public funds tend to have more restrictions on individual bond selection due to risk control and liquidity requirements, while private funds have greater flexibility, potentially leading to higher returns [7] - The performance of private equity convertible bond products can vary significantly, with top performers achieving remarkable returns, but also carrying higher risks and lower transparency [6][7] - Investors are advised to focus on selecting high-quality management products rather than engaging in direct trading, especially in a volatile market environment [10]

Group 1 - The core concept of "Fixed Income +" is to combine fixed income assets with a small portion of higher-risk assets like stocks and convertible bonds to enhance returns while maintaining stability [2][10][15] - "Fixed Income +" typically consists of two parts: the fixed income portion, which includes low-risk bond assets for defensive purposes, and the "+" portion, which includes stocks and convertible bonds for offensive growth [2][15] - The performance of "Fixed Income +" products is influenced by the negative correlation between stocks and bonds, which helps to reduce volatility risk [3][15] Group 2 - Different stock-bond ratios significantly impact the returns and risks of "Fixed Income +" products, with higher stock allocations leading to greater long-term returns but also increased volatility risk [5][6] - Classic "Fixed Income +" products include primary bond funds, secondary bond funds, and mixed bond funds, with secondary bond funds and mixed bond funds being the most representative [10][15] - Broader definitions of "Fixed Income +" also encompass hedge funds and all-weather strategy funds, which may not have a high proportion of bonds but use strategies to control volatility risk [12][15] Group 3 - The increasing attention on "Fixed Income +" products is attributed to the decline in deposit interest rates, leading to rapid growth in this investment category [15] - For investors seeking a more convenient way to invest in "Fixed Income +", products like "Monthly Salary Treasure" are recommended, with a low initial investment threshold of 200 yuan [15]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In Q3 2025, the scale of public offering fixed - income + funds increased significantly compared to the previous quarter, reaching a record high, with the increment mainly coming from secondary bond funds, possibly due to institutional funds such as insurance funds and wealth management [2][7]. - The concentration of leading institutions has increased. The proportion of the top ten fund companies in the fixed - income + fund scale has risen from 43.0% in Q2 2025 to 46.0% in Q3 2025 [2]. - The equity position of fixed - income + funds has risen to the highest level since Q1 24, with obvious increased allocation to equities. The funds mainly increased their holdings in the manufacturing sector while also considering finance, technology, and basic industries [2]. - Fixed - income + funds' top ten heavy - position stocks are relatively stable overall, and the ten stocks with the most increased holdings are mainly concentrated in the technology field [2]. - In Q3 2025, convertible bond funds and secondary bond funds became the main forces for increasing convertible bonds. Fixed - income + funds continued to prefer convertible bonds in the banking sector, but the proportion of bank - sector convertible bonds decreased, while the proportions of convertible bonds in the power equipment, non - bank finance, and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery industries increased significantly [2][3]. - There is no significant correlation between the scale of fixed - income + funds and their yield distribution characteristics. The income of small - and medium - scale products is more elastic, and in Q3 2025, the proportion of products with positive income is 83.49%, with an average yield of about 3.16% [3][66]. 3. Summaries According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Overall Scale: Secondary Bond Funds Become the Main Force for Expansion - Fixed - income + funds are a hybrid investment strategy that uses fixed - income assets as the core allocation and enhances returns through a small amount of equity - asset allocation. Their scale increased rapidly in Q2 and Q3 25, reaching over 2.5 trillion yuan again in Q3 25 [7]. - In Q3 2025, the scale of public offering fixed - income + funds increased significantly compared to the previous quarter, reaching a record high. The total net asset value of fixed - income + funds was about 2.75 trillion yuan, a significant increase of 0.5 trillion yuan from Q2 25, with a month - on - month increase of 23.2%. The increment mainly came from secondary bond funds, whose scale exceeded that of primary bond funds and became the largest type of fixed - income + funds [2][7]. - The number of fixed - income + funds increased slightly in Q3 2025, also reaching a record high. The proportion of secondary bond funds in the total market's net asset value increased significantly, while the proportions of primary bond funds and partial - debt hybrid funds decreased slightly [10][13]. - The significant increase in the scale of secondary bond funds in Q3 may be mainly due to institutional funds such as insurance funds and wealth management. For example, the proportion of secondary bond funds in bank wealth - management bond - fund investments increased by 6.3 pct month - on - month to 8.9%, and the investment scale increased by 0.06 trillion yuan to 0.09 trillion yuan [2][14]. 3.2 Institutional Scale: Concentration of Leading Institutions Increases 3.2.1 Stock Scale Ranking - In Q3 2025, the proportion of the top ten public - offering fund companies in the fixed - income + fund scale increased month - on - month, and the industry concentration increased. The proportion of the top five fund companies increased from 26.2% in Q2 2025 to 28.9% in Q3 2025, and the proportion of the top ten increased from 43.0% to 46.0% [20]. - As of the end of September 2025, the top ten fund companies in the fixed - income + fund scale were E Fund, Invesco Great Wall Fund, Fullgoal Fund, Huatai - PineBridge Fund, Bosera Fund, China Merchants Fund, GF Fund, China Europe Fund, China Asset Management, and Penghua Fund [20]. 3.2.2 Stock Scale Changes - In Q3 2025, the scale changes of different - scale fund companies in the fixed - income + fund field showed significant differentiation. Large - scale public - offering fund companies had a scale increase far exceeding the industry average, while small - and medium - sized fund companies had little scale change, and some even shrank [26]. - Different types of fund companies also showed significant differentiation in the scale growth of fixed - income + funds in Q3 2025. Private - equity - affiliated fund companies led with an increase of 85.89 billion yuan, followed by securities - affiliated and bank - affiliated fund companies, while insurance - affiliated fund companies had a contraction of 3.6 billion yuan [29]. - In Q3 2025, leading institutions became the main force for growth. The top ten public - offering fund companies in the scale growth of fixed - income + funds were Invesco Great Wall Fund, Fullgoal Fund, Bosera Fund, Huatai - PineBridge Fund, China Europe Fund, E Fund, Yongying Fund, Penghua Fund, GF Fund, and Huashang Fund [30]. 3.3 Asset Allocation Changes: Increase in Equity Position 3.3.1 Changes in the Allocation of Major Asset Classes of Fixed - Income + Funds - According to Q3 2025 data, the asset - allocation structure of fixed - income + funds was adjusted, and the stock position rose to the highest level since Q1 24. The market - wide market - value proportions of stocks, bonds, and cash in fixed - income + funds in Q3 25 were 8.9%, 87.1%, and 1.4% respectively, with corresponding scale increases of 1020.9 billion yuan, 3759.6 billion yuan, and 35.8 billion yuan compared to Q2 25 [35]. - Except for convertible bond funds, the stock - holding proportions of other types of bond funds increased to varying degrees compared to the previous quarter, while the bond - holding proportions decreased to varying degrees [39]. 3.3.2 Changes in Stock - Asset Investment - Fixed - income + funds' equity assets are mainly invested in the manufacturing sector. In Q3 2025, the manufacturing sector accounted for about 63% of the investment scale, followed by the mining, finance, and information transmission, software, and information technology services industries, with a total proportion of about 24% [47]. - In Q3 2025, the manufacturing industry was the most significantly increased industry, with a scale increase of 634 billion yuan and a proportion increase of 6.03 percentage points. The mining and information transmission, software, and information technology services industries also had increased investment, while the power, construction, real estate, and education industries had reduced investment [49]. - In Q3 2025, the top ten heavy - position stocks of fixed - income + funds were relatively stable overall. Zijin Mining, CATL, and Tencent Holdings remained in the top three, and technology stocks such as Alibaba - W, Zhongji Innolight, Luxshare Precision, and SMIC entered the top ten. The overall allocation direction of the top ten heavy - position stocks continued to hold the growth sector [50]. - The ten stocks with the most increased holdings by fixed - income + funds in Q3 2025 were mainly concentrated in the technology field, and 8 of them also entered the top ten heavy - position stocks of public - offering funds in the same quarter [52]. 3.3.3 Changes in Convertible - Bond Asset Investment - Among fixed - income + funds, convertible bond funds and secondary bond funds are the main holders of convertible bonds. In Q3 2025, convertible bond funds and secondary bond funds became the main forces for increasing convertible bonds, while primary bond funds and partial - debt hybrid funds reduced their holdings [53][55]. - Overall, about 11.19% of fixed - income + funds' assets were allocated to convertible bonds in Q3 2025. Only the convertible - bond position of convertible bond funds increased month - on - month, while the positions of other fixed - income + funds decreased [55]. - Among the top five heavy - position bonds of fixed - income + funds, financial bonds and treasury bonds dominated in Q3 2025, with a total proportion of about 80%, and convertible bonds accounted for 7.5% [56]. - Among the top five heavy - position bonds of fixed - income + funds in Q3 2025, bank - sector convertible bonds still dominated, but the proportion decreased, while the proportions of convertible bonds in the power equipment, non - bank finance, and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery industries increased significantly [61]. - The top ten convertible bonds with the most increased holdings by fixed - income + funds in Q3 2025 were mainly concentrated in the banking, non - bank finance, and power equipment sectors, and 8 of them also entered the top ten in the convertible - bond holding scale of fixed - income + funds in the same quarter [65]. 3.4 Performance - According to Q3 2025 data, there is no significant correlation between the scale of fixed - income + funds and their yield distribution characteristics. The income of small - and medium - scale products is more elastic. In Q3 2025, the proportion of products with positive income was 83.49%, and the average yield was about 3.16% [66]. - The top ten fixed - income + funds with outstanding performance in Q3 2025 included Huaan Zhilian Hybrid (LOF), Southern Changyuan Convertible Bond, etc. These funds achieved excess returns through flexible allocation of equity positions such as technology and convertible - bond assets [67]. - Among the top ten heavy - position stocks of fixed - income + funds with a quarterly yield of over 18% in Q3 2025, the technology - growth sector dominated, and the holdings were relatively decentralized, reflecting the differentiated positioning of different fixed - income + products' investment strategies [68].