恒生指数

Search documents
市场主流观点汇总-20250827
Guo Tou Qi Huo· 2025-08-27 00:41
市场主流观点汇总 2025/8/26 此报告,意在客观反映行业内期货公司、证券公司对大宗商品各品种的 研究观点,追踪热点品种,分析市场投资情绪,总结投资驱动逻辑等。 本报告不构成个人投资建议,仅供公司内部使用,仅作参考之用。 报告说明 期货从业资格证号:F3036000 投资咨询从业资格证号:Z0016090 黄 恬 期货从业资格证号:F03100883 投资咨询从业资格证号:Z0021089 | 报告中策略观点和投资逻辑是基于所采纳的机构当周公开发布的研究报 | | --- | | 告,对于各期货品种的多空观点、交易逻辑进行整理加工汇总而成,收 | | 盘价数据选择上周五,周度涨跌为上周五较前一周五收盘价变动幅度。 | | 【行情数据】 | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 资产类别 | 细分品种 | 收盘价 | | 周度涨跌情况 | | | | | 数据时点 | | 2025/8/22 | | 2025/8/18 | 至 | 2025/8/22 | | | | PTA | 4868.00 | PTA | | ...
大类资产运行周报:鲍威尔表态偏鸽,美元指数偏弱运行-20250825
Guo Tou Qi Huo· 2025-08-25 11:41
Tabl e_Title 2025 年 8 月 25 日 大类资产运行周报(202500818-20250822) 风险提示:美国通胀数据改善不及预期 大类资产运行报告 全球主要资产表现 | | 近一周变动 | | --- | --- | | 新兴市场股市指数 | -0.46% | | Table_Fi rstSto ck 发达市场股市指数 主要资产涨跌幅表现 | 0.44% | | 全球债券指数 | 0.16% | | 全球国债指数 | 0.08% | | 全球信用债指数 姓名 | 0.26% | | 美元指数 | 分析师 -0.12% SAC 执业证书编号:S1111111111111 | | | Xxxxxx @essence.com.cn | | RJ/CRB 商品价格指数 | 1.51% | | | 021-68767839 | | 标普高盛商品全收益指数 | 2.12% | 丁沛舟 高级分析师 期货从业资格号:F3002969 投资咨询从业证书号:Z0012005 dingpz@essence.com.cn 010-58747724 相关报告 大类资产运行周报(20250602 -20250606 ...
凌云社区为成员量身打造三大基金投资选择
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-23 19:24
凌云社区为成员量身打造三大基金投资选择 随着全球经济快速变革和市场波动加剧,投资者的需求也越来越多样化。凌云社区深知社区成员在投资过程中面对的挑战与机遇,特 别是在不同风险偏好和财务目标下的多元化需求。为此,凌云社区正式推出三大基金产品——极速基金、增值基金和稳定基金,为社 区成员提供灵活、安全且高效的投资选择,帮助他们在复杂市场中找到适合自己的理财方式。 二.服务社区成员,构建信任与专业支持 一.精准布局三大基金,满足不同需求 1.极速基金:短期高效交易选择 对于风险承受能力较强、喜欢捕捉市场短期机会的社区成员,极速基金是理想选择。该基金主要投资比特币、以太坊、黄金等高波动 性资产,通过日内交易策略和先进交易系统实现高效增值。极速基金为社区成员提供了资金高周转和即时市场机会的投资平台,让热 衷短期投资的朋友能够紧跟市场节奏。 2.增值基金:中长期稳健增值 对于追求资产长期稳健增长的社区成员,增值基金提供了平衡风险与收益的投资方案。基金主要投资于成熟市场和新兴市场的优质交 易所交易基金(ETF),如标普500、纳斯达克100和沪深300等。通过长期持有和科学配置,增值基金致力于帮助社区成员实现资产增 值,同时 ...
港股,重大调整!
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-08-22 11:41
炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报,权威,专业,及时,全面,助您挖掘潜力主题机会! 8月22日,恒生指数有限公司(简称"恒生指数公司")宣布截至2025年6月30日的恒生指数系列季度检讨结 果,其中在港股市场最受关注的指数之一——恒生指数,成份股数目将进一步增加,由85只增加至88只, 加入中国电信、京东物流、泡泡玛特3只股票。 恒生指数成份股又扩容了! 8月22日,根据恒生指数公司发布的新闻稿,港股市场将调整多个指数成份股,其中恒生指数成份股将由85 只进一步增加至88只。 恒生综合指数成份股数目也有所扩容,由502只增加至504只。 上述变动将于2025年9月5日(星期五)收市后实施,并于2025年9月8日(星期一)起生效。 值得注意的是,这是恒生指数成份股的进一步扩容。此前,在恒生指数公司宣布的截至2025年3月31日的恒 生指数系列季度检讨结果中,恒生指数成份股由83只增加至85只。 恒生指数成份股再"扩容" | | | | 代號 | 公司 | 恒指分類指數 | | --- | --- | --- | | 728 | 中國電信股份有限公司 - H 股 | 恒生工商業分類指數 | | 2618 | 京東物流股份有 ...
港股,重大调整
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-08-22 11:41
8月22日,根据恒生指数公司发布的新闻稿,港股市场将调整多个指数成份股,其中恒生指数成份股将由85 只进一步增加至88只。 恒生综合指数成份股数目也有所扩容,由502只增加至504只。 上述变动将于2025年9月5日(星期五)收市后实施,并于2025年9月8日(星期一)起生效。 值得注意的是,这是恒生指数成份股的进一步扩容。此前,在恒生指数公司宣布的截至2025年3月31日的恒 生指数系列季度检讨结果中,恒生指数成份股由83只增加至85只。 恒生指数成份股再"扩容" 8月22日,恒生指数有限公司(简称"恒生指数公司")宣布截至2025年6月30日的恒生指数系列季度检讨结 果,其中在港股市场最受关注的指数之一——恒生指数,成份股数目将进一步增加,由85只增加至88只, 加入中国电信、京东物流、泡泡玛特3只股票。 | 代號 | 公司 | 恒指分類指數 | | --- | --- | --- | | 728 | 中國電信股份有限公司 - H 股 | 恒生工商業分類指數 | | 2618 | 京東物流股份有限公司 | 恒生工商業分類指數 | | 9992 | 泡泡瑪特國際集團有限公司 | 恒生工商業分類指數 | 另一 ...
市场主流观点汇总-20250820
Guo Tou Qi Huo· 2025-08-20 11:22
Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the given content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report The report objectively reflects the research views of futures and securities companies on various commodity varieties, tracks hot - spot varieties, analyzes market investment sentiment, and summarizes investment driving logics. It presents the market mainstream views on different asset classes, including their price changes and the corresponding multi - and short - term logics[2]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1 Market Price Data - **Commodities**: From August 11 to August 15, 2025, palm oil had the highest weekly increase of 5.11% at a closing price of 9460.00; while gold had the largest weekly decline of 1.52% at a closing price of 775.80. Other commodities like polysilicon, bean meal also showed varying degrees of increase or decrease[3]. - **Stocks**: A - shares (CSI 500, SSE 50, etc.), overseas stocks (Nikkei 225, S&P 500, etc.) generally showed an upward trend. For example, CSI 500 increased by 3.88%[3]. - **Bonds**: Chinese 10 - year government bonds increased by 2.36%, while 2 - year government bonds decreased by 0.26%[3]. - **Foreign Exchange**: The euro against the US dollar increased by 0.54%, while the US dollar index decreased by 0.43%[3]. 3.2 Commodity Views 3.2.1 Macro - Financial Sector - **Stock Index Futures**: Among 8 institutions, 4 were bullish, 1 was bearish, and 3 expected a sideways trend. Bullish factors included increased trading volume in the stock market, favorable policies, and improved liquidity. Bearish factors were potential over - heating in some indices and high A - share valuations[5]. - **Treasury Bond Futures**: Among 7 institutions, 1 was bullish, 3 were bearish, and 3 expected a sideways trend. Bullish factors were loose funds, central bank's net injection, and weak economic data. Bearish factors were volatile long - term bonds and strong stock market performance[5]. 3.2.2 Energy Sector - **Crude Oil**: Among 9 institutions, 2 were bullish, 4 were bearish, and 3 expected a sideways trend. Bullish factors included high - load operation of US refineries and expected end of OPEC+ production increase. Bearish factors were the progress of US - Russia summit and the slowdown of Asian oil demand[6]. 3.2.3 Agricultural Products Sector - **Palm Oil**: Among 8 institutions, 4 were bullish and 4 expected a sideways trend. Bullish factors were strong export data and low inventory in some regions. Bearish factors were the call for policy re - evaluation in Indonesia and increased domestic inventory[6]. 3.2.4 Non - Ferrous Metals Sector - **Aluminum**: Among 7 institutions, 1 was bullish, 1 was bearish, and 5 expected a sideways trend. Bullish factors were improved macro - policies and low domestic inventory. Bearish factors were US tariff expansion and unstable trade situation[7]. 3.2.5 Chemical Sector - **Methanol**: Among 8 institutions, 5 were bearish and 3 expected a sideways trend. Bullish factors were policy support and cost increase. Bearish factors were high import volume and low demand in the off - season[7]. 3.2.6 Precious Metals Sector - **Gold**: Among 8 institutions, 1 was bearish and 7 expected a sideways trend. Bullish factors were expected Fed rate cuts and economic data deterioration. Bearish factors were high PPI data and improved risk appetite[8]. 3.2.7 Black Metals Sector - **Iron Ore**: Among 8 institutions, 1 was bullish, 3 were bearish, and 4 expected a sideways trend. Bullish factors were increased iron - water production and decreased global shipments. Bearish factors were increased port inventory and weak demand for steel products[8].
宏观和大类资产配置周报:下一个重要时点或在三季度中下旬-20250819
Bank of China Securities· 2025-08-19 09:20
Macro Economic Overview - The report indicates that the next important time point may be in the late third quarter of 2025, with a suggested asset allocation order of stocks > commodities > bonds > currency [2][4] - In the first half of 2025, China's actual GDP grew by 5.3% year-on-year, laying a good foundation for achieving the annual target of 5.0% [2][4] - Economic data from July shows signs of growth pressure, including weakened external demand due to increased tariffs from the US and sluggish domestic consumption [2][4] Asset Performance - The A-share market saw an increase, with the CSI 300 index rising by 2.37% and the CSI 300 stock index futures up by 2.83% [11][12] - Commodity futures showed mixed results, with coking coal futures up by 0.33% and iron ore down by 1.65% [11][12] - The yield on ten-year government bonds rose by 6 basis points to 1.75%, while active ten-year government bond futures fell by 0.26% [11][12] Policy Insights - The report emphasizes the importance of expanding domestic demand in the second half of the year, suggesting that policies should be implemented to enhance efficiency and release domestic demand [2][4] - It is noted that the fiscal policy may have room for further adjustments within the year, particularly in light of external pressures easing due to potential interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve [2][4] Sector Performance - The report highlights that the TMT sector has shown significant growth, with the ChiNext index leading with an 8.58% increase, followed by the Shenzhen Component Index at 4.55% [35][36] - The report also notes that the banking sector has faced declines, with a drop of 3.22% [35][36] Financial Data - In July, new social financing amounted to 1.13 trillion yuan, while new RMB loans decreased by 500 million yuan, indicating weak financing demand in the real economy [4][17] - The M2 money supply grew by 8.8% year-on-year, reflecting a relatively strong liquidity environment despite weak economic indicators [4][17]
策略定期报告:港股科技会跟上
Guotou Securities· 2025-08-17 10:05
Group 1 - The report emphasizes that the current market is experiencing a liquidity-driven bull market, with the potential for a transition to a fundamental bull market by the end of the year, contingent on external factors such as global tariff resolutions and fiscal expansions in major economies [3][4][87] - The report identifies a significant performance gap between growth stocks, particularly in the ChiNext index, and value stocks, suggesting that the ChiNext index is currently undervalued and poised for further gains [2][31][50] - The report highlights the increasing inflow of southbound funds into Hong Kong stocks, particularly in the technology sector, indicating a shift in investor sentiment towards growth-oriented assets [12][32][44] Group 2 - The report outlines a "three-headed bull" market scenario, which includes a short-term liquidity bull market, a mid-term fundamental bull market, and a long-term transition from old to new economic drivers, suggesting a comprehensive market recovery [3][4][5] - The report notes that the current market environment is conducive to a structural shift towards "middle assets," which are expected to outperform as the economy stabilizes and earnings begin to recover [46][47][56] - The report indicates that the current valuation of the ChiNext index is at a historical low, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 33.89, suggesting a relative valuation advantage compared to other major indices [50][51][52]
为何牛市来了多数人还是赚不到钱?
雪球· 2025-08-06 09:21
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of the Chinese stock market in July, highlighting that A-shares outperformed Hong Kong stocks due to various factors, including government policies and market dynamics [4][5]. Group 1: Market Performance - In July, major Chinese stock indices such as the Wind All A, CSI 300, and Hang Seng Index saw increases of +4.75%, +3.54%, and +2.91% respectively, indicating a stronger performance of A-shares compared to Hong Kong stocks [4]. - The article notes that small-cap stocks in A-shares showed stronger performance than large-cap stocks during this period [4]. Group 2: Factors Influencing A-share Performance - The central government's "anti-involution" supply-side reform measures announced on July 1 are believed to have positively impacted investor sentiment, particularly in cyclical industries that are expected to recover [5]. - The high market activity and significant gains in individual stocks have improved risk appetite among investors, leading to increased market participation [5]. Group 3: Bull Market Dynamics - The article explores how bull markets form, emphasizing that economic improvement is not a prerequisite for a bull market; rather, market valuations and investor sentiment play crucial roles [8][14]. - Historical data shows that the Producer Price Index (PPI) can reflect macroeconomic conditions, and past bull markets have occurred even during periods of negative PPI growth [9]. Group 4: Investor Behavior in Bull Markets - The article identifies common reasons why many investors fail to profit during bull markets, including selling stocks during market lows out of fear and missing out on subsequent gains [15][16]. - It highlights the psychological barriers and decision-making challenges investors face, such as fear of missing out and the difficulty in identifying the right stocks to buy [17][18]. Group 5: Current Market Strategy - The article suggests that the current market may be characterized as a structural bull market, with potential for cyclical recovery in certain sectors due to government policies [21]. - It advises investors to avoid perfectionism in their investment strategies and to focus on achieving reasonable returns rather than waiting for the perfect entry point [22].
市场主流观点汇总-20250805
Guo Tou Qi Huo· 2025-08-05 10:04
Market Data Summary - The report presents the closing prices and weekly price changes of various assets as of August 1, 2025, compared to July 28, 2025. Commodities like crude oil had a 2.92% increase, while most others, such as palm oil, soybean meal, and copper, experienced declines. A - shares, overseas stocks, and bonds also mostly saw negative changes, with exceptions like the US dollar index and US dollar mid - price showing increases [2]. Commodity Views Summary Macro - Financial Sector Stock Index Futures - The report collected views from 8 institutions, with 3 bullish, 2 bearish, and 3 expecting a sideways trend. Bullish factors include the upcoming full - scale opening of childcare subsidy applications, the World Artificial Intelligence Conference boosting the tech sector, central bank liquidity injection, and the extension of the tariff buffer period. Bearish factors involve the lack of new policy surprises in the Politburo meeting, reduced A - share trading volume, the Fed's unchanged interest rate, a decrease in ETF shares tracking the CSI 300, and a decline in the July manufacturing PMI [4]. Treasury Bond Futures - Seven institutions' views were collected, with 0 bullish, 1 bearish, and 6 expecting a sideways trend. Bullish factors are the increasing expectation of Fed rate cuts, the unchanged expectation of loose monetary policy, stable - growth policies not exceeding expectations, and the tax - free advantage of existing bonds. Bearish factors include the taxation of new bonds reducing their attractiveness, positive market risk appetite diverting funds to stocks, and low short - term chasing value [4]. Energy Sector - For crude oil, 8 institutions' views were gathered, with 2 bullish, 3 bearish, and 3 expecting a sideways trend. Bullish factors are high US refinery operating rates, increased US sanctions on Russian oil, OPEC +'s lower - than - expected production increase, and improved macro sentiment due to a tariff agreement. Bearish factors include lower - than - expected US gasoline consumption, OPEC +'s decision to accelerate production in September, a shift in global oil demand from strong to weak, and a significant downward revision of US non - farm payroll data [5]. Agricultural Products Sector - Regarding live hogs, 8 institutions' views were collected, with 1 bullish, 3 bearish, and 4 expecting a sideways trend. Bullish factors are strong expectations of policy - driven capacity reduction, farmers' resistance to price cuts, a slower slaughter pace, and a potential decrease in August supply after an increase in July. Bearish factors are the large supply of heavy hogs, an expected increase in piglet supply from September to the end of the year, high hog inventories, and suppressed demand due to summer and high temperatures [5]. Non - Ferrous Metals Sector Aluminum - Eight institutions' views were gathered, with 0 bullish, 5 bearish, and 3 expecting a sideways trend. Bullish factors are low domestic aluminum ingot inventories, increased weekly production of aluminum strips and foils, improved downstream profits, and moderate inventory accumulation. Bearish factors are weakening macro sentiment, tariff - affected exports to the US, weakening production and orders of aluminum profiles, and supply pressure during the inventory accumulation phase [6]. Chemicals - Soda Ash - Eight institutions' views were collected, with 0 bullish, 5 bearish, and 3 expecting a sideways trend. Bullish factors are stable downstream demand, downstream inventory reduction and subsequent replenishment needs, and potential short - covering rallies. Bearish factors are long - term over - capacity issues, a return to fundamental trading due to weakening macro sentiment, reduced demand expectations for photovoltaic glass, and low motivation for producers to cut production [6]. Precious Metals - Gold - Seven institutions' views were collected, with 4 bullish, 0 bearish, and 3 expecting a sideways trend. Bullish factors are concerns about economic recession due to revised US non - farm payroll data, concerns about monetary policy independence from White House personnel changes, increased safe - haven demand due to a falling US dollar index and a slumping stock market, a technical breakthrough, and the potential for further upward movement after a long consolidation. Bearish factors are reduced uncertainty from US - Japan and US - EU tariff agreements, a hawkish stance from Powell, and potential further rebounds in the US dollar index [7]. Black Metals - Iron Ore - Eight institutions' views were gathered, with 0 bullish, 3 bearish, and 5 expecting a sideways trend. Bullish factors are high steel mill profit margins, a decline in overseas ore shipments, a decrease in port iron ore inventories, and high hot metal production. Bearish factors are an increase in domestic port arrivals, the fading of anti - cut - throat competition trading, lower - than - expected policy strength from the Politburo meeting, an increase in non - Australian and non - Brazilian ore shipments, and a decrease in daily hot metal production due to adverse weather [7].