Core Viewpoint - Tesla's Q4 2025 global deliveries fell short of expectations, primarily due to the cancellation of the IRA subsidy in the U.S. and other factors [2] Group 1: Tesla Performance - In Q4 2025, Tesla's global delivery volume decreased by 15.6% year-on-year and 15.9% quarter-on-quarter, totaling 418,000 vehicles, with Model 3 and Model Y deliveries down by 13.8% year-on-year and 15.5% quarter-on-quarter to 407,000 vehicles [2] Group 2: NIO and Other New Energy Vehicles - NIO regained the top position among new energy vehicle manufacturers in December, with a delivery volume of 48,135 vehicles, representing a year-on-year increase of 54.6% and a quarter-on-quarter increase of 32.7% [3] - Ideal's delivery volume decreased by 24.4% year-on-year but increased by 33.3% quarter-on-quarter to 44,246 vehicles [3] - Xiaopeng's delivery volume increased by 2.2% year-on-year and 2.1% quarter-on-quarter to 37,508 vehicles [3] Group 3: New Year Purchase Incentives - Tesla announced that the domestic Model 3 will be delivered in February 2026, with various financing policies extended [4] - Ideal's delivery cycles for several models have been adjusted, with cash subsidies available for January purchases [4] - NIO and Xiaopeng also introduced various delivery cycle adjustments and promotional offers for their vehicles [4][5] Group 4: Policy Updates - The Ministry of Commerce and other departments released the implementation details for the 2026 vehicle trade-in subsidy, extending the policy for another year and adjusting the subsidy method [6]

Core Viewpoint - The 2026 Guangdong electricity annual trading shows a "volume increase and price decrease" trend, with the overall on-grid electricity price remaining stable year-on-year [4]. Group 1: Trading Volume and Price - The total trading volume excluding green electricity increased by 5.38% year-on-year, reaching a recent high, while the average transaction price decreased by 5.03%, corresponding to 2 cents/kWh [4]. - The average wholesale electricity price for 2025 was 0.392 yuan/kWh, while for 2026 it is projected to be 0.372 yuan/kWh, a decrease of 2 cents/kWh year-on-year [4]. Group 2: Capacity Pricing - Capacity pricing is executed according to national and provincial regulations, with a subsidy level of 100 yuan/kW for 2025, leading to a capacity subsidy of 0.025 yuan/kWh based on the 2024 coal-fired utilization hours of 3950 hours [4]. - For 2026, the capacity subsidy is expected to rise to 0.042 yuan/kWh, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 1.6 cents/kWh [4]. Group 3: Profitability of Power Generation - The annual long-term contract for 1 million kW units in 2026 reflects the current operating costs of thermal power, with an estimated average profit of 2 cents/kWh for the year based on the average coal price in 2025 [5]. - More efficient 1 million kW ultra-supercritical units are expected to achieve profitability, while smaller units (300,000 kW and 600,000 kW) are likely to incur losses [5]. Group 4: Impact of Green Electricity - As of 2024, thermal power's installed capacity and generation account for 54.8% and 70.7% of Guangdong's total, respectively, with the influence of green electricity on overall supply and demand expected to increase [6]. - The mechanism electricity price in Guangdong is set at 0.36 yuan/kWh, while the 2026 long-term contract price for thermal power is 0.372 yuan/kWh, indicating that the long-term contract price is above the green electricity mechanism price [6][7]. Group 5: Market Dynamics - The impact of green electricity on thermal power pricing is significant, particularly during peak solar output periods, which is expected to further lower spot electricity prices [7]. - The signed 2026 annual long-term contract price provides a profitability floor for Guangdong thermal power units, and without the price floor limitation, the bidding results could exceed the lower limit [7].

Core Viewpoint - China, as the world's largest producer of steel, copper, and aluminum, has achieved significant indirect exports of these metals through the export of finished products [4] Direct Exports - In 2024, direct exports of steel, copper, and aluminum will account for 11%, 9%, and 15% of China's production, respectively, with crude steel production at 1 billion tons (53% of global production), electrolytic copper at 13.64 million tons (50%), and electrolytic aluminum at 4.401 million tons (60%) [5] - The export volumes for 2024 are projected to be 11.106 million tons of steel, 0.129 million tons of copper, and 0.663 million tons of aluminum, with corresponding percentages for Q1-Q3 2025 being 12%, 10%, and 13% [5] Indirect Exports of Steel - In 2024, indirect exports of steel will account for 13% of China's crude steel production, with a total of 12.848 million tons exported, including 4.98 million tons of steel products and 5.392 million tons of machinery [6] - For Q1-Q3 2025, the indirect export volume is expected to reach 110 million tons, representing 14% of crude steel production [6] Indirect Exports of Copper - In 2024, indirect exports of copper will account for 11% of China's copper production, totaling 2.65 million tons, with significant contributions from home appliances (0.86 million tons) and cables (1.17 million tons) [7] - For Q1-Q3 2025, indirect copper exports are projected to be 0.225 million tons, representing 12% of production [7] Indirect Exports of Aluminum - In 2024, indirect exports of aluminum will account for 11% of China's aluminum production, with 7.36 million tons exported, including 4.205 million tons of aluminum products [8] - For Q1-Q3 2025, the indirect export volume is expected to be 0.62 million tons, representing 12% of aluminum production [8] Incremental Exports - The combined incremental exports of steel, copper, and aluminum (both direct and indirect) will account for 6%, 5%, and 4% of their respective production in 2024 [9] - Direct export increments will represent 2%, 1%, and 1% of production, while indirect export increments will account for 4% for each metal [9]

点击注册小程序 查看完整报告 特别申明： 本订阅号中所涉及的证券研究信息由光大证券研究所编写，仅面向光大证券专业投资者客 户，用作新媒体形势下研究信息和研究观点的沟通交流。非光大证券专业投资者客户，请勿 订阅、接收或使用本订阅号中的任何信息。本订阅号难以设置访问权限，若给您造成不便， 敬请谅解。光大证券研究所不会因关注、收到或阅读本订阅号推送内容而视相关人员为光大 证券的客户。 报告摘要 投资：资本市场稳中向好有望持续推动险企盈利释放 一方面，随着上市险企投资资产规模持续稳健增长以及股票仓位维持在较高水平（25H1末五家上市险企合 计9.3%的股票资产占比已是近十年最高值），权益市场稳中向好将进一步提振险企投资收益表现，进而推 动盈利释放。另一方面，未来随着险企进一步提升OCI股票配置力度，高股息策略下分红收入提升有助于 险企进一步夯实净投资收益安全垫；同时，若26年长端利率企稳态势延续（25年四季度10年期国债收益率 稳定于1.79%-1.87%区间），将利好险企新增固收资产投资收益率。 风险提示： 保费收入不及预期；资本市场大幅波动；利率超预期下行。 2026年1月2日，香港保险指数上涨3.0%，跑赢恒生 ...

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the current state of credit bond issuance and maturity in China, indicating a decrease in issuance and a mixed performance in net financing across different types of bonds [4][5]. Group 1: Credit Bond Issuance and Maturity - As of December 31, 2025, the total outstanding credit bond balance in China is 31.29 trillion yuan. In December 2025, a total of 1,089.23 billion yuan in credit bonds was issued, representing a month-on-month decrease of 17.19%. The total repayment amount was 912.56 billion yuan, resulting in a net financing of 176.67 billion yuan [4]. - The outstanding balance of local government financing bonds (城投债) is 15.37 trillion yuan. In December 2025, the issuance of local government bonds reached 371.72 billion yuan, which is a month-on-month decrease of 9.19% and a year-on-year decrease of 22.55%. The net financing amount for local government entities was 44.42 billion yuan [4]. - The outstanding balance of industrial bonds (产业债) is 15.92 trillion yuan. In December 2025, the issuance of industrial bonds was 717.52 billion yuan, showing a month-on-month decrease of 20.8% but a year-on-year increase of 22.17%. The net financing for industrial entities was 132.25 billion yuan [4]. Group 2: Credit Bond Transactions and Spreads - In December 2025, the transaction volume of local government bonds was 1,101.40 billion yuan, showing a month-on-month increase but a year-on-year decrease. The turnover rate for local government bonds was 7.17% [5]. - The transaction volume of industrial bonds in December 2025 was 1,473.46 billion yuan, with both month-on-month and year-on-year increases. The turnover rate for industrial bonds was 9.23% [5]. - The credit spreads for local government bonds across various ratings widened compared to the previous month, indicating increased risk perception. Similarly, the credit spreads for industrial bonds also widened across all ratings [5].

Group 1 - The A-share market experienced a steady upward trend in December, with major indices showing increased trading volume and a gradual recovery in market sentiment, indicating a shift from trading factors to fundamental factors dominating the market [4] - The total outstanding credit bonds in China reached 31.29 trillion yuan by the end of December 2025, with a net financing of 176.67 billion yuan for the month, despite a 17.19% month-on-month decline in issuance [4] - The new public fund sales regulations released by the China Securities Regulatory Commission on December 31, 2025, are expected to impact bank wealth management asset allocation behaviors, with public funds held amounting to 1.34 trillion yuan as of Q3 2025 [5] Group 2 - The Hong Kong insurance sector is anticipated to benefit from a strong "opening red" performance, driven by favorable sales in January and a positive investment return outlook due to a stable equity market [6] - The direct and indirect exports of steel, copper, and aluminum are projected to account for 24%, 17%, and 21% of domestic production in 2024, with expectations of improved export conditions in 2026 due to easing US-China trade tensions [6] - The annual long-term electricity price in Guangdong for 2026 is expected to reflect current operating costs of thermal power, with average profitability estimated at 0.02 yuan per kilowatt-hour based on average coal prices from 2025 [7] Group 3 - Tesla's Q4 2025 deliveries fell short of expectations, while NIO regained the top position among new energy vehicle manufacturers in December, with the continuation of the trade-in subsidy policy likely to boost sales in 2026 [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implementation of the "Regulations on the Management of Sales Fees for Publicly Raised Securities Investment Funds," which aims to optimize the sales fee structure and enhance the flexibility of redemption fees, thereby impacting the asset allocation behavior of bank wealth management products [4][5]. Group 1: Key Changes in Sales Fee Regulations - The new regulations introduce more flexible redemption fee structures, significantly reducing liquidity constraints for wealth management products [5]. - The minimum holding period for certain funds has been reduced from 6 months to 30 days, allowing for easier access to funds for investors [5]. - The maximum subscription fees for passive index funds have been lowered from 0.8% to 0.3%, which helps in reducing the cost of wealth management allocations [4][5]. Group 2: Impact on Wealth Management Asset Allocation - As of Q3 2025, the total amount of wealth management products holding publicly raised funds reached 1.34 trillion [6]. - The allocation of wealth management products to public funds is primarily driven by the need to quickly deploy excess funds, especially during periods of asset scarcity [6]. - There is a notable increase in the demand for equity asset allocation within wealth management products, indicating a shift in investment strategy [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article analyzes the evolution of Japan's banking crisis in the 1990s, highlighting the stages of crisis development, causes, reforms, and the subsequent recovery of the real estate and banking sectors [4][5][6][7]. Group 1: Stages of the Banking Crisis - The banking crisis in Japan during the 1990s can be divided into three stages: 1. Following the "Plaza Accord," the Bank of Japan significantly lowered interest rates, leading to increased speculation in the stock and real estate markets as investment returns weakened in the real economy [4]. 2. In the early 1990s, policies shifted to burst the asset bubble, severely damaging the balance sheets of households and businesses, with risks accumulating [4]. 3. The increase in "special loans" and deteriorating asset quality, compounded by the Asian financial crisis, led to risks spreading from small to large institutions [4]. Group 2: Causes of the Crisis - The main causes of the banking crisis include: 1. The wave of financial liberalization intensified "disintermediation," with a lax regulatory environment and aggressive operational styles among institutions, leading to increased stock investments and a focus on real estate lending [5]. 2. The main bank system created a strong bond between banks and enterprises, hindering the timely disposal of problematic assets and increasing risk contagion [5]. 3. The "escort fleet" mechanism resulted in a lack of risk isolation among institutions, with strong administrative protection hindering the clearance of non-performing assets [5]. Group 3: Reforms Post-Crisis - The post-crisis period saw two major phases of concentrated reforms aimed at risk disposal: 1. The late 1990s financial "big bang" reforms abandoned government protection, established the Financial Supervisory Agency, and improved regulatory effectiveness, alongside legal processes for handling failing institutions [6]. 2. The "Financial Revitalization Plan" focused on the disposal of non-performing assets and initiated business rectification for poorly performing institutions, while the government used "preferred shares with conversion rights" to enhance market operations and expedite capital recovery [6]. Group 4: Structural Recovery in Real Estate - In the post-crisis era, Japan's real estate sector experienced structural recovery with regional differentiation: - Major urban areas like Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya saw net population inflows, supporting the real estate market, with a rapid recovery in apartment transaction volumes and prices [7]. - The development of REITs in the early 21st century improved financing channels for real estate companies, enhancing transaction liquidity [7]. - Leading real estate firms shifted from a heavy asset and capital model to a more refined approach, increasing the proportion of light asset and light cycle businesses while expanding into overseas markets [7]. Group 5: Changes in Banking Operations - The banking sector in Japan post-crisis exhibited five key characteristics: 1. The pace of scale expansion slowed, with a focus on defensive asset allocation, increasing the proportion of high liquidity and low-risk assets [8]. 2. Different types of banks showed varied asset allocation behaviors, with urban banks diversifying their business structures and increasing overseas asset allocations [8]. 3. The liability side showed a clear trend towards savings and demand deposits, with a widening duration gap in asset-liability management [8]. 4. Overseas investment styles remained conservative, primarily focusing on investment-grade corporate bonds, with a relatively weak stability in funding sources [8]. 5. The contribution of fee-based and intermediary business revenues increased, with urban banks showing a distinct advantage [8]. Group 6: Lessons from Risk Disposal and Development - Four key lessons can be drawn from Japan's experience in risk disposal and post-crisis development: 1. Risk evolution is characterized by time lags, non-linearity, and diffusion, with regulatory laxity exacerbating crises [10]. 2. Excessive reliance on fiscal injections and administrative restructuring for non-performing asset disposal has slowed the establishment of market competition mechanisms [10]. 3. Caution is needed in overseas expansion regarding geopolitical, exchange rate, and maturity mismatch risks, necessitating dynamic hedging mechanisms for global asset allocation [10]. 4. In an aging and low-interest environment, institutional innovation is required to reshape the financial intermediary function and break inefficient equilibria [10].

光大证券研究所 祝您2026元旦快乐 光大 证券 EVEBRIGHT SECURITIES 1 点击上方"光大证券研究"可以订阅哦 ...

天地风霜尽，乾坤气象和。 光大研究财经月历，一览重点经济数据发布时间表。两款尺寸手机 屏保，全球财经大事尽在掌握。 瘦身版适合苹果X等全面屏 n Th 光大证券 U 四 | G 六 日 1 元旦 2 3 UN 4 十四 十六 中国12月CPl/PPP 美国12月 制造业PMI 中国12月 外汇储备 10 11 6 8 9 5 / 十八 冬三九 小寒 十九 tt- 中国12月M2/社融 美国12月CPl 中国12月 12月零售 12 16 14 17 18 13 15 甘八 冬四九 tte 甘五 甘六 甘七 三十 中国12月 工业/投资/社浦 第四季度GDP 22 23 20 21 24 25 19 初四 腊月 大寒 初三 初六 初七 美联储议息会议 美国第四季度GDF 中国1月 官方制造业PMI 26 27 28 30 29 31 腊八节 初九 初十 +二 +- +三 丰满版适合多数非全面屏 ...