Fiscal Revenue Growth - In 2024, national general public budget revenue grew by 1.3% year-on-year, while local general public budget revenue increased by 1.7%[1] - The growth rates for fiscal revenue in different regions were: Northeast (6.2%), West (3.2%), Central (1.8%), and East (0.8%)[9] Regional Disparities - Western provinces showed faster fiscal revenue growth compared to Eastern and Central regions, driven by the importance of energy security and the Belt and Road Initiative[2] - In 2024, the top five provinces by fiscal revenue were Guangdong (13,533 billion), Jiangsu (10,038 billion), Zhejiang (8,706 billion), Shanghai (8,374 billion), and Shandong (7,711 billion)[10] Economic Challenges - The slowdown in fiscal revenue growth is attributed to insufficient effective demand, price declines, and tax incentives in the real estate sector[1] - Multiple provinces experienced negative growth in VAT and corporate income tax revenues due to various economic pressures, including declining industrial profits and resource tax revenues[1] Historical Context - Since 1949, China's fiscal revenue has evolved significantly, with major changes occurring post-1978 and 1994 due to reforms in the fiscal system[2] - The fiscal revenue ranking has shifted, with Guangdong maintaining the top position for 34 consecutive years, reaching 1.35 trillion in 2024 despite challenges[7] Future Outlook - A more proactive fiscal policy is anticipated for 2025 to address ongoing economic uncertainties and structural tax reductions[1] - The long-term effects of incremental policy changes are expected to gradually enhance fiscal revenue potential and stabilize local finances[1]

最近一年行业相对走势 资料来源：聚源 -31% -22% -14% -5% 4% 13% 24/01 24/03 24/05 24/07 24/08 医药生物 沪深300 证券研究报告 | 行业月报 2024 年 2 月 11 日 投资要点 分析师：李兴 执业编号：S0300518100001 电话：010-83755576 邮箱：lixing@ykzq.com 研究助理：刘莎 电话：15625156877 邮箱：liusha@ykzq.com 近期报告 《【粤开医药】看好创新升级、并购重组 与产业出海——医药行业 2025 年展望》 2025-01-13 《【粤开医药】整体承压，局部分化—— 医药行业 2024 年回顾》2025-01-12 《【粤开医药】优化商业健康保险对创新 药的支付——医保数据共享是关键》 2024-12-08 医药生物 【粤开医药】从摩根大通医疗健康大 会看生物创新药管线：关注 ADC、 双特异性抗体、细胞与基因治疗 2025 年第四十三届摩根大通医疗健康年会（JPM 大会）盛大召开。国内百济 神州、恒瑞医药、信达生物、康方生物等约 30 家企业参会，分享了多个重 磅品种最新成果，中 ...

证券研究报告 | 宏观深度 2025 年 02 月 09 日 投资要点 分析师：罗志恒 执业编号：S0300520110001 电话：010-83755580 邮箱：luozhiheng@ykzq.com 分析师：马家进 执业编号：S0300522110002 电话：13645711472 邮箱：majiajin@ykzq.com 分析师：邓洪波 执业编号：S0300524070001 电话：18612595900 邮箱：denghongbo@ykzq.com 近期报告 《【粤开宏观】2025 年地方政府怎么干？ 目标与抓手》2025-02-04 《【粤开宏观】特朗普打响"加征关税 2.0" 第一枪：原因、影响、推演及应对》 2025-02-02 《【粤开证券】"特朗普 2.0"对华加征关税 在不同情景下的影响测算》2025-01-23 《【粤开宏观】《关于推动中长期资金入市 工作的实施方案》有哪些看点？哪些期 待？》2025-01-23 《【粤开宏观】复盘 2024 年中国经济，力 争 2025 年一季度"开门红"》2025-01-19 宏观研究 【粤开宏观】美国制造业回流：效果 和展望 摘要 2008 年 ...

Group 1: Tariff Actions and Rationale - Trump signed an executive order on February 1, 2025, imposing a 10% tariff on Chinese imports and a 25% tariff on products from Canada and Mexico, effective February 4, 2025[1] - The tariffs are justified under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), citing threats from illegal immigration and drugs[5] - The U.S. imports from China, Canada, and Mexico accounted for over 40% of total U.S. imports in 2023, with trade deficits from these countries being significant[6] Group 2: Economic Impact on China - The 10% tariff on Chinese goods is expected to reduce China's export growth to the U.S. by 12 percentage points in 2025, impacting overall export growth by 1.8 percentage points[16] - Labor-intensive goods such as furniture and toys are particularly vulnerable, with a 1% increase in tariffs leading to a 1.5 percentage point drop in export growth for these categories[17] - The indirect impact from tariffs on Canada and Mexico could further decrease China's exports by 0.06 percentage points due to reduced imports from these countries[19] Group 3: Future Tariff Developments - The current 10% tariff is likely just the beginning, with potential increases to 20%-30% in future tariffs, raising the average tariff rate on Chinese goods to 40%-50%[24][26] - Future tariff actions may involve phased increases based on ongoing negotiations, similar to the previous "301 investigations" approach[27] - Targeted measures may be implemented against Chinese goods, including stricter import scrutiny and tariffs on low-value cross-border e-commerce packages[28]

Economic Growth Targets - The average GDP growth target for 31 provinces in 2025 is set at 5.3%, slightly lower than the 2024 target of 5.4%[2][3][14]. - 29 provinces have set their GDP growth targets between 5% and 6%, with Tibet having the highest target of "over 7%, striving for 8%" and Qinghai the lowest at "around 4.5%"[2][15]. Fiscal Revenue Goals - The average growth target for local general public budget revenue in 2025 is 2.9%, which is 2.5 percentage points lower than the GDP growth target[5][7][22]. - 24 out of 30 provinces have lowered their fiscal revenue growth targets compared to 2024, with the highest target being 10% for both Xinjiang and Tibet, and the lowest at 1.1% for Jiangxi[5][6][28]. Sector-Specific Targets - Industrial production targets have been generally raised, with Guangdong increasing its target from 5% to around 6% and Tibet setting a high target of 16%[8][30]. - Social retail sales growth targets have been significantly lowered, indicating a need to boost consumer demand, with Hubei adjusting from over 9% to around 7%[8][35]. Employment and Price Stability - The urban unemployment rate target is generally maintained at around 5.5% across most provinces, with a total of 16.51 million new urban jobs expected to be created in 2025[9][39]. - The Consumer Price Index (CPI) growth target has been adjusted down to around 2% for most provinces, reflecting current low inflation pressures[9][38]. Key Economic Strategies - Provinces are focusing on boosting consumption and expanding domestic demand as a priority for 2025, with initiatives to support major consumption and service sectors[10][43]. - Investment strategies emphasize improving investment efficiency rather than merely increasing investment scale, with a focus on new infrastructure and green transformation projects[10][33].

Group 1: Impact of Tariffs on China’s Exports - The "Trump 1.0" tariffs affected approximately $370 billion worth of goods, accounting for 68.7% of U.S. imports from China in 2018[3] - Average tariff rates on Chinese imports rose from 3.1% in early 2018 to 21% by the end of 2019, before slightly decreasing to 19.3% in early 2020[3][4] - Before tariff implementation, Chinese exports to the U.S. saw significant increases, with average growth rates of 21.5%, 31.8%, and 14.6% for different tariff lists, compared to an overall export growth of 11.2%[6] Group 2: Export Trends Post-Tariff Implementation - After tariffs were enacted, exports of goods on the "301 tariff" list dropped by 15.1%, while non-tariff list exports grew by 7.9%[7] - The share of Chinese exports to the U.S. fell from 19.1% in 2017 to 15.0% in 2023, while the U.S. share of imports from China decreased from 17.4% to 11.1%[8][47] - Despite a decline in direct exports to the U.S., China's global export share increased from 12.8% in 2017 to 14.2% in 2023[10][47] Group 3: Future Tariff Scenarios and Economic Impact - A 10% tariff increase could lead to a 12% drop in Chinese exports to the U.S. and a 0.3% decrease in China's GDP growth[11] - A potential 20%-30% tariff increase could result in a 24-36% decline in exports to the U.S. and a 0.7%-1.0% reduction in GDP growth[12] - In an extreme scenario with a 60% tariff, exports to the U.S. could plummet by 49%, leading to a 1.4% decrease in GDP growth[12] Group 4: Strategic Responses and Recommendations - China should implement strong countermeasures against U.S. tariffs and enhance negotiation leverage[15] - Increasing domestic demand and fiscal measures are crucial to offset potential declines in external demand[15] - Expanding trade partnerships, particularly with "Belt and Road" countries, is essential for maintaining export growth[15]

Group 1: Implementation Plan Highlights - The implementation plan aims to increase the actual investment ratio of long-term funds towards policy limits, with insurance funds currently at 12% and a potential upper limit of 25%[5] - Large state-owned insurance companies are expected to allocate 30% of new premiums to A-shares starting in 2025, potentially adding several hundred billion yuan annually to the market[6] - The plan introduces long-cycle assessments for public funds and insurance companies, with a focus on three to five-year performance metrics, increasing the weight of long-term indicators to at least 60%[7] Group 2: Market Comparison and Challenges - As of the end of 2023, long-term funds in China totaled 44.73 trillion yuan, with only 5.14 trillion yuan (6.6%) invested in the stock market, compared to 14.84 trillion USD (17.3%) in the US[5] - A-share companies have shown an average EPS growth of 2.68% from 2014 to 2023, significantly lower than the GDP growth of 5.75% during the same period, indicating weaker profitability[9] - The average annualized return of the CSI 300 index was 5.42%, lower than the S&P 500's 7.55%, highlighting the need for improved company quality and investment value[9] Group 3: Future Policy Optimization - Future policies may include relaxing investment restrictions for long-term funds and adopting a "prudent person" regulatory approach, moving away from strict quantitative limits[15] - There is potential to increase the overseas investment limits for pension funds and insurance companies, which are currently capped at 20% and 15% respectively[18] - The establishment of automatic enrollment mechanisms in pension plans could enhance participation rates, similar to successful models in the US[21]

Economic Performance - In 2024, China's GDP reached 134.9 trillion yuan, marking a 5% year-on-year growth and surpassing the 130 trillion yuan threshold for the first time[1] - The quarterly GDP growth rates were 5.3%, 4.7%, 4.6%, and 5.4%, indicating a "U-shaped" recovery throughout the year[2] - The nominal GDP growth rate was 4.2%, which was lower than the actual growth rate of 5%, leading to a divergence between macro data and micro perceptions[3] Support and Challenges - Key supports for the economy included a surprising rebound in exports, with a year-on-year growth of 5.9%, and significant increases in manufacturing investment, which rose by 9.2%[10] - Central government infrastructure investments saw a notable increase, with railway and water management investments growing by 13.5% and 41.7%, respectively[10] - Challenges included sluggish consumer spending, with retail sales growing only 3.5%, and a continued decline in the real estate market, where sales area and investment fell by 12.9% and 10.6% respectively[11] Outlook for 2025 - The report suggests setting a growth target of "double 5" for 2025, aiming for both nominal and actual GDP growth around 5%[3] - Three favorable conditions for Q1 2025 include enhanced policies to boost consumption and investment, accelerated project construction, and signs of stabilization in the real estate market[6] - Risks include unresolved debt and liquidity issues in the real estate sector and potential external shocks from increased tariffs under the new U.S. administration[25]

Group 1: Debt Relief Measures - The central government proposed a "6+4+2" debt relief initiative to resolve 12 trillion yuan of hidden debt with 10 trillion yuan over five years, significantly alleviating local government liquidity risks[6] - The initiative aims to transition local governments from emergency states to normal development, enhancing their economic growth capabilities[6] - The debt relief approach emphasizes accountability, ensuring local governments remain responsible for their hidden debts, thus reinforcing fiscal discipline[8] Group 2: Economic Implications - The debt relief measures reflect a shift from "developing through debt relief" to "debt relief through development," indicating a strategic change in fiscal policy[10] - The initiative is expected to save approximately 600 billion yuan in interest payments over five years by replacing high-cost, short-term hidden debts with lower-cost, long-term bonds[15] - The focus on sustainable economic growth is crucial for fiscal sustainability, as economic viability underpins the effectiveness of fiscal policies[13] Group 3: Long-term Considerations - Three key issues post-debt relief include managing short-term liquidity risks, establishing a long-term debt management mechanism, and ensuring debt supports economic development effectively[16] - The need for deeper fiscal and tax reforms is highlighted, particularly in constructing debt and capital budgets and reallocating responsibilities from local to central governments[19] - The alignment of debt expenditure structures with economic growth objectives is essential, ensuring that debt contributes positively to asset creation and economic benefits[25]

Group 1: Fiscal Role in Economic Growth - Fiscal policy is the core of China's economic issues, influencing growth, fluctuations, and risk management[5] - Fiscal measures like tax reductions and increased spending can stimulate consumption and investment[7] - Fiscal policy serves as a bridge between government and market, enhancing market participant engagement[7] Group 2: Understanding Consumption - Consumption and investment should not be viewed as opposing forces; both are essential for economic health[12] - Investment is crucial for long-term supply optimization, while consumption drives immediate demand[13] - The relationship between consumption and investment is interdependent, requiring a balanced approach[12] Group 3: Recommendations for Boosting Consumption - Increase targeted subsidies for specific groups, such as unemployed youth and low-income families, to enhance consumption capacity[23] - Propose a real estate stability fund of approximately 2 trillion yuan to support housing market stability, which can indirectly boost consumer confidence[25] - Implement policies like "trade-in" for consumer goods to stimulate demand, with a focus on durable goods[26] Group 4: Long-term Structural Reforms - Improve national income distribution through tax reforms and increased transfer payments to elevate the share of low-income groups[29] - Optimize fiscal expenditure structure to balance investment and consumption, with a focus on social welfare[31] - Enhance public services for migrant workers to stabilize their expectations and boost consumption demand[35]