Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided. 2. Core Viewpoints - This week, the high - sulfur crack spread fluctuated and declined, the near - month spread decreased, and the EW weakened rapidly. The 380 8 - 9 month spread dropped to $4.25, the basis oscillated at a low level, the FU07 internal - external spread oscillated at - $5, and the 09 spread oscillated at + $10. There was a large amount of delivery goods in the near - month, maintaining a loose pattern [4]. - The low - sulfur crack spread rebounded, the month spread dropped to around $5, the basis weakened slightly and oscillated at $6. The LU internal - external spread remained strong, with the 09 spread oscillating at around $17 [7]. - This week, Singapore's on - shore inventory increased, floating storage oscillated at a high level, low - sulfur floating storage decreased slightly. ARA's on - shore inventory increased slightly, but the inventory was still at the lowest level in the same period of history, and floating storage inventory oscillated with low - sulfur floating storage increasing. Fujairah's on - shore inventory increased significantly, and floating storage decreased slightly [7]. - This week, geopolitical risks were lifted. Recently, fuel oil exports from Iran and Iraq remained at a high level, and Egypt's net imports reached a new high. The high - sulfur fundamentals were in an oscillating pattern. Currently, high - sulfur is in the peak power - generation season, the near - month internal - external spread of FU is under pressure, the valuation is low, and the game continues. In the future, pay attention to the shipping situation in the Middle East. The LU internal - external spread is running at a high level, and pay attention to the domestic production situation [7]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs Rotterdam Fuel Oil Data - From June 23 to June 27, 2025, the price of Rotterdam 3.5% HSF O swap M1 decreased from $460.60 to $411.99, a change of - $1.97; the price of Rotterdam 0.5% VLS FO swap M1 increased from $509.41 to $474.54, a change of $0.38; and other related spreads also had corresponding changes [2]. Singapore Fuel Oil Data - Swap data: From June 23 to June 27, 2025, the price of Singapore 380cst M1 decreased from $471.10 to $415.91, a change of - $7.34; the price of Singapore VLSFO M1 increased from $540.67 to $498.49, a change of $3.37 [2][6]. - Spot data: From June 23 to June 27, 2025, the FOB 380cst price decreased from $475.90 to $416.77, a change of - $10.95; the FOB VLSFO price increased from $549.45 to $504.02, a change of $2.08 [3]. Domestic FU Data - From June 23 to June 27, 2025, the price of FU 01 changed from 3180 to 2864, a change of 1; the price of FU 05 changed from 3100 to 2811, a change of - 1; the price of FU 09 changed from 3385 to 3002, a change of - 17 [3]. Domestic LU Data - From June 23 to June 27, 2025, the price of LU 01 changed from 3815 to 3528, a change of 29; the price of LU 05 changed from 3701 to 3434, a change of 14; the price of LU 09 changed from 3968 to 3600, a change of - 23 [4].

Report Summary 1) Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided. 2) Core View of the Report - The LPG market shows complex trends, with civil gas prices rising first and then falling. The PG futures price fluctuates widely, the basis strengthens, and the spread between months changes little. The external market price weakens significantly, and the oil - gas ratio first suppresses and then rises. The import price drops significantly, and the profit of PDH production improves slightly. It is expected that the operating rates of PDH and alkylation will rise slightly next week, the combustion demand remains weak, and the subsequent price will generally stabilize [1]. 3) Summary by Related Catalogs Daily Data - From June 22 - 27, 2025, prices of various LPG - related products such as South China LPG, East China LPG, Shandong LPG, etc., show different trends. For example, South China LPG price changes from 4695 on June 22 to 4710 on June 27, with a daily change of - 45 on the 27th. The cheapest deliverable is Shandong civil gas at 4590. The 08 - 09 spread of PG is 94, and the US - to - Far - East arbitrage window is closed [1]. Weekly View - Civil gas prices rise first and then fall. The market is bullish at the beginning of the week due to geopolitical tensions, but then is under pressure as overall supply is high, high prices are resisted by downstream, and the easing of the Middle East situation leads to a sharp drop in oil prices. The basis of PG strengthens to 345. The external market price weakens significantly, and the oil - gas ratio first suppresses and then rises. The import price drops significantly, the profit of PDH spot production improves, and the profit calculated by paper goods rises. The profit of alkylation oil increases significantly, the profit of MTBE gas - fraction etherification remains basically flat, and the profit of isomerization etherification rises. In terms of fundamentals, port inventories increase due to more arrivals, factory inventories increase slightly with regional differentiation (East China destocks, South China and Shandong build up inventories), and external sales increase. The operating rate of PDH rises to 70.54% (+4.33 pct), and the operating rate of alkylation is 46.02% (-1.84 pct), with MTBE production basically flat. The number of registered warrants is 8358 (+0) [1].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - PTA: After the cease - fire between Iran and Israel this week, oil prices quickly gave back the geopolitical premium and returned to a volatile state. The upstream cost support collapsed, and the PTA futures market followed suit. However, in terms of supply - demand structure, PTA itself did not accumulate inventory. It is expected that the PTA spot price will continue to fluctuate and adjust following the cost side in the short term, with the spot basis fluctuating within a certain range. Attention should be paid to the polyester load reduction in July [5]. - MEG: At the beginning of this week, the ethylene glycol port inventory will still show a certain decline. However, there will be a concentrated arrival of foreign - owned vessels at the beginning of July, and the subsequent visible inventory will gradually increase. The domestic and foreign supply will gradually recover, and the supply - demand of ethylene glycol will shift to inventory accumulation in the third quarter, with an overall increase of around 200,000 tons. The on - site spot liquidity will continue to be released. In addition, the polyester sales have been weak recently, and the terminal load has declined. The subsequent industrial chain contradictions will gradually be transmitted upwards. It is expected that the price of ethylene glycol will be mainly adjusted weakly in the short term, and attention should be paid to the changes in polyester load [7]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 Previous Day's Review No relevant content provided. 3.2 Daily Tips - **PTA** - **Fundamentals**: On Friday, there were transactions for mid - to - late July at 09 + 250 - 257, with the price negotiation range around 5,000 - 5,045. The mainstream spot basis today is 09 + 255. The 3.6 - million - ton unit of Yisheng New Materials reduced its load last week, and by Friday, the PTA load dropped to 77.7% [6]. - **Basis**: The spot price is 5,025, and the basis of the 09 contract is 247, with the futures price at a discount, which is bullish [6]. - **Inventory**: The PTA factory inventory is 4.09 days, a decrease of 0.06 days compared to the previous period, which is bullish [6]. - **Market**: The 20 - day moving average is upward, and the closing price is above the 20 - day moving average, which is bullish [6]. - **Main Position**: The net long position increased, which is bullish [6]. - **MEG** - **Fundamentals**: On Friday, the price center of ethylene glycol declined weakly, and the market trading was weak. The domestic and foreign price centers of ethylene glycol declined weakly. The recent mainstream negotiation price for foreign vessels was around 506 - 511 US dollars/ton, and the domestic trading negotiation range was 4,323 - 4,370 yuan/ton [7]. - **Basis**: The spot price is 4,340, and the basis of the 09 contract is 69, with the futures price at a discount, which is bullish [7]. - **Inventory**: The total inventory in the East China region is 504,700 tons, a decrease of 26,300 tons compared to the previous period, which is bullish [7]. - **Market**: The 20 - day moving average is downward, and the closing price is below the 20 - day moving average, which is bearish [7]. - **Main Position**: The main net short position increased, which is bearish [7]. 3.3 Today's Focus No relevant content provided. 3.4 Fundamental Data - **PTA Supply - Demand Balance Sheet**: It shows the PTA production capacity, load, output, supply, demand, inventory, and other data from January 2024 to December 2025, reflecting the supply - demand situation and inventory changes of PTA over the years [11]. - **Ethylene Glycol Supply - Demand Balance Sheet**: It presents the ethylene glycol total operating rate, production, supply, demand, port inventory, and other data from January 2024 to December 2025, showing the supply - demand relationship and inventory changes of ethylene glycol [12]. - **Price Data**: It includes the price changes of various products such as naphtha, PX, PTA, MEG, polyester filaments, and polyester staple fibers on June 26 and 27, 2025, as well as the basis and profit data of futures contracts [13]. - **Inventory Analysis**: It shows the inventory data of PTA, MEG, PET chips, and polyester products from 2021 to 2025 through charts, including factory inventory days and port inventory [41][43]. - **Polyester Upstream and Downstream Operating Rates**: It presents the operating rate data of PTA, PX, ethylene glycol, polyester factories, and Jiangsu - Zhejiang looms from 2020 to 2025 through charts, reflecting the production status of the polyester industry chain [52][54][56][58]. - **Profit Data**: It includes the profit data of PTA processing, MEG production in different ways, and polyester fiber production from 2022 to 2025, helping to analyze the profitability of the industry [60][63][65]

Report Summary Core View - The Treasury bond futures first declined and then rebounded last week, with an overall decline. The risk appetite in the equity market was restored due to the easing of the Israel-Iran conflict. The net long positions of speculators and allocators both showed negative growth on a weekly basis. The view that the market will be volatile in the long term is maintained. Appropriate choices should be made to go long on the inter - delivery spread, allocate at low prices, and hedge at high prices [3] Key Points by Section 1. Weekly Focus and Market Tracking - Treasury bond futures contracts fluctuated downward on a weekly basis. The TL contract was greatly affected by the volatility of the market's risk appetite, with a relatively large decline, and the yield curve steepened [5] - In terms of basis characteristics, the basis trend was stable, and the IRR of the main contract was basically between 1.8 - 1.9. Regarding the inter - delivery spread, the 09 - 12 combination was flat this week, and it is recommended to hold a long inter - delivery spread portfolio. The yield curve showed a steepening trend, and opportunities for curve steepening should be monitored [7] 2. Liquidity Monitoring and Curve Tracking - No specific content provided other than the section title [10] 3. Seat Analysis - In terms of the daily change in net long positions by institutional type, private funds decreased by 0.45%, foreign capital decreased by 0.74%, and wealth management subsidiaries decreased by 0.55%. On a weekly basis, private funds decreased by 3.78%, foreign capital decreased by 8.77%, and wealth management subsidiaries decreased by 7.86% [12]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance and mechanics of quantitative neutral strategies, emphasizing their ability to generate returns independent of market fluctuations while also highlighting the associated risks and costs involved in their execution [2][3][9]. Group 1: Mechanics of Neutral Strategies - Neutral strategies aim to achieve returns that are not correlated with market movements by going long on stocks and shorting index futures, effectively hedging market risk and capturing stock selection alpha [3]. - The concept of "basis" is crucial, as it represents the difference between futures and spot prices. A negative basis (contango) increases the cost of hedging for new positions, while a positive basis (backwardation) reduces costs [5][8]. - The performance of neutral strategies is significantly influenced by the basis level at the time of position establishment, impacting overall profitability [8]. Group 2: Historical Performance - Neutral strategies have shown positive returns from 2019 to 2024, with notable annual variations. For instance, they achieved double-digit returns in 2019 and 2020, but faced challenges in 2024, with a year-to-date return of -2.60% as of October [9][10]. - The article provides a detailed performance table for various strategies from 2019 to 2024, indicating that while some strategies performed well, others struggled, particularly in 2024 due to market volatility and extreme conditions [10]. Group 3: Market Conditions and Timing - The article suggests that the success of neutral strategies is contingent upon market conditions, particularly the availability of excess returns and the level of basis costs. Favorable conditions include high trading volumes and volatility, which enhance the potential for excess returns [15]. - The recent market conditions in 2024, characterized by extreme price movements and liquidity crises, have adversely affected neutral strategies, leading to significant drawdowns [13][14]. - The article concludes that timing is essential when investing in neutral products, as entering during periods of high basis costs can lead to unfavorable outcomes [15].

Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant information provided Core View of the Report - During the consumption off - season, domestic cotton prices are expected to fluctuate with limited rebound height, and the basis may decline with the rebound of the futures price. Attention should be paid to the latest progress of Sino - US negotiations, domestic domestic demand policies and their implementation effects, waiting for new drivers [4] Summary by Related Catalogs Domestic Cotton Futures - CF01 on June 26 was 13665, up 40 (0.29%) from June 25 [3] - CF09 on June 26 was 13720, up 75 (0.55%) from June 25 [3] - CF09 - 01 spread on June 26 changed to 35 from 20 on June 25 [3] Domestic Cotton Spot - In Xinjiang on June 26, the price was 14957, up 125 (0.84%) from June 25 [3] - In Henan on June 26, the price was 15050, up 78 (0.52%) from June 25 [3] - In Shandong on June 26, the price was 15023, up 70 (0.47%) from June 25 [3] - Xinjiang - main contract basis on June 26 was 1237, up 50 from June 25 [3] Domestic Cotton Yarn Futures - CY on June 26 was 20060, up (0.33%) from June 25 [3] Domestic Cotton Yarn Spot - C32S price index on June 26 was 20380, up 80 (0.39%) from June 25 [3] - CT (USD/磅) on June 26 was unchanged at 68.32 (0.00%) from June 25 [3] - The arrival price on June 26 was 77.40, up 0.7 (0.91%) from June 25 [3] US Cotton Spot - 1% quota pick - up price on June 26 was 13714, up 122 (0.90%) from June 25 [4] - Sliding - scale duty pick - up price on June 26 was 14423, up 76 (0.53%) from June 25 [4] Spread Data - Yarn - cotton spread (futures) on June 26 was 6395, up 25 from June 25 [4] - Yarn - cotton spread (spot) on June 26 was 709, down 46 from June 25 [4] - Domestic - foreign spread (spot) on June 26 was 1309, down 52 from June 25 [4]

1. Index Trends - On June 26, the Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.22% to close at 3448.45 points, with a trading volume of 603.095 billion yuan; the Shenzhen Component Index fell by 0.48% to close at 10343.48 points, with a trading volume of 980.056 billion yuan [1]. - The CSI 1000 Index fell by 0.45%, with a trading volume of 343.746 billion yuan. The opening price was 6272.44, the closing price was 6247.79, the highest price was 6310.54, and the lowest price was 6244.78 [1]. - The CSI 500 Index fell by 0.41%, with a trading volume of 235.224 billion yuan. The opening price was 5868.29, the closing price was 5838.25, the highest price was 5885.25, and the lowest price was 5835.34 [1]. - The SSE 50 Index fell by 0.34%, with a trading volume of 87.101 billion yuan. The opening price was 2740.23, the closing price was 2738.47, the highest price was 2747.61, and the lowest price was 2734.95 [1]. 2. Impact of Sector Movements on Indexes - The CSI 1000 Index dropped 28.37 points from the previous closing price. Sectors such as automobiles, electronics, and pharmaceuticals significantly dragged down the index [2]. - The CSI 500 Index dropped 24.3 points from the previous closing price. The banking sector significantly boosted the index, while sectors such as power equipment, pharmaceuticals, and electronics significantly dragged it down [2]. - The SSE 300 Index dropped 14.05 points from the previous closing price. Sectors such as banking, communications, and food and beverages significantly boosted the index, while sectors such as power equipment, automobiles, and non - bank finance significantly dragged it down [2]. - The SSE 50 Index dropped 9.26 points from the previous closing price. Sectors such as banking, food and beverages, and public utilities significantly boosted the index, while sectors such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, and non - bank finance significantly dragged it down [2]. 3. Stock Index Futures Basis and Annualized Opening Costs - For IM contracts, IM00 had an average daily basis of - 45.13, IM01 had - 100.83, IM02 had - 162.62, and IM03 had - 331.27 [12]. - For IC contracts, IC00 had an average daily basis of - 35.8, IC01 had - 76.94, IC02 had - 119.69, and IC03 had - 235.25 [12]. - For IF contracts, IF00 had an average daily basis of - 26.42, IF01 had - 38.77, IF02 had - 43.57, and IF03 had - 74.93 [12]. - For IH contracts, IH00 had an average daily basis of - 24.19, IH01 had - 28.38, IH02 had - 27.35, and IH03 had - 26.96 [12]. 4. Stock Index Futures Roll - over Point Differences and Annualized Costs - For IM contracts, data on roll - over point differences and their annualized costs at different time points are provided, such as at 09:45, IM00 - 01 was - 53.1193, IM00 - 02 was - 158.791, etc. [22]. - For IC contracts, data on roll - over point differences and their annualized costs at different time points are provided, such as at 09:45, IC00 - 01 was - 26.1467, IC00 - 02 was - 90.0318, etc. [24]. - For IF contracts, data on roll - over point differences and their annualized costs at different time points are provided, such as at 09:45, IF00 - 01 was - 5.99267, IF00 - 02 was - 13.4098, etc. [29]. - For IH contracts, data on roll - over point differences and their annualized costs at different time points are provided, such as at 09:45, IH00 - 01 was - 1.29644, IH00 - 02 was 1.559889, etc. [28]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Last week, the yield of treasury bonds showed a volatile and slightly stronger trend. Although the social financing data increased year - on - year, it was mainly driven by government bonds, and the credit demand remained weak. Coupled with the manufacturing PMI still below the boom - bust line, it strengthened the market's judgment of a weak economy, supporting the bond market. Geopolitical tensions and the escalation of the Middle East situation increased risk - aversion sentiment, which was also beneficial to the bond market. Although the Lujiazui Forum signaled financial opening, there were no more - than - expected loose measures, cooling the market's expectation of the central bank's treasury bond trading, causing interest - rate bonds to rise and then fall. In June, the LPR remained unchanged, the stock market weakened, and the capital side was relatively stable. The bond market generally rose, and the market's expectation of loose policies in the second half of the year increased. Ultra - long - term treasury bond trading was active, but the overall situation was still affected by the policy vacuum period [3]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Interest Rate Pricing Tracking Indicators - Price indicators: China's CPI (monthly) had a month - on - month change of - 0.20% and a year - on - year change of - 0.10%; China's PPI (monthly) had a month - on - month change of - 0.40% and a year - on - year change of - 3.30% [8]. - Monthly economic indicators: The social financing scale was 426.16 trillion yuan, with a month - on - month increase of 2.16 trillion yuan and a growth rate of 0.51%; M2 year - on - year was 7.90%, with a decrease of 0.10% and a decline rate of 1.25%; the manufacturing PMI was 49.50%, with an increase of 0.50% and a growth rate of 1.02% [8]. - Daily economic indicators: The US dollar index was 97.31, with a decrease of 0.40 and a decline rate of 0.41%; the US dollar against the offshore RMB was 7.1603, with a decrease of 0.008 and a decline rate of 0.11%; SHIBOR 7 - day was 1.67, with no change and a decline rate of 0.06%; DR007 was 1.69, with a decrease of 0.01 and a decline rate of 0.51%; R007 was 1.64, with a decrease of 0.12 and a decline rate of 6.66%; the 3 - month inter - bank certificate of deposit (AAA) was 1.63, with an increase of 0.01 and a growth rate of 0.78%; the AA - AAA credit spread (1Y) was 0.07, with a decrease of 0.01 and a growth rate of 0.78% [8]. 3.2 Treasury Bonds and Treasury Bond Futures Market Overview No specific content provided for summary other than figure references such as the closing price trend of the main continuous contracts of treasury bond futures and the price change situation of various treasury bond futures varieties [9][15][17][19]. 3.3 Money Market Fundamentals - On June 26, 2025, the central bank carried out a 7 - day reverse repurchase operation of 509.3 billion yuan at a fixed interest rate of 1.5%. The main term repurchase interest rates of 1D, 7D, 14D, and 1M were 1.370%, 1.670%, 1.736%, and 1.622% respectively, and the repurchase interest rates had recently declined [2]. 3.4 Spread Overview No specific content provided for summary other than figure references such as the inter - period spread trend of various treasury bond futures varieties and the spread between spot - bond term spreads and futures cross - variety spreads [41][44][45]. 3.5 Two - Year Treasury Bond Futures No specific content provided for summary other than figure references such as the implied interest rate of the TS main contract and the maturity yield of treasury bonds, and the IRR of the TS main contract and the capital interest rate [47][49]. 3.6 Five - Year Treasury Bond Futures No specific content provided for summary other than figure references such as the implied interest rate of the TF main contract and the maturity yield of treasury bonds, the basis trend of the TF main contract in the past three years, and the net basis trend of the TF main contract in the past three years [56][59][62]. 3.7 Ten - Year Treasury Bond Futures No specific content provided for summary other than figure references such as the implied interest rate of the T main contract and the maturity yield of treasury bonds, the basis trend of the T main contract in the past three years, and the net basis trend of the T main contract in the past three years [67][70]. 3.8 Thirty - Year Treasury Bond Futures No specific content provided for summary other than figure references such as the implied interest rate of the TL main contract and the maturity yield of treasury bonds, the basis trend of the TL main contract in the past three years, and the net basis trend of the TL main contract in the past three years [75][78][81]. 3.9 Strategies - Unilateral: The repurchase interest rate declined, the price of treasury bond futures fluctuated, and the 2509 contract was neutral [4]. - Arbitrage: Pay attention to the widening of the basis [4]. - Hedging: There is an adjustment pressure in the medium term, and short - sellers can use far - month contracts for appropriate hedging [4].

Report Summary 1. Core Viewpoint - This week, the high - sulfur cracking was volatile, with crude oil rising significantly. High - sulfur fuel oil, with a large proportion of Iranian supply, performed well in oil product profits. The 380 - cst monthly spread was volatile, at $7.5 for the 8 - 9 month spread, and the basis was also volatile. The domestic and foreign spreads of FU showed differentiation between near and far months. The 07 contract dropped to around -$7 (with expected large delivery volume), and the 09 contract fluctuated around $8. The 0.5 - cst cracking in Singapore declined, and the monthly spread was volatile. This week, Singapore's land inventory decreased, high - sulfur floating storage increased, low - sulfur floating storage increased, ARA's inventory decreased, floating storage inventory was volatile, and the US inventory decreased. Saudi Arabia's shipments decreased month - on - month, being moderately high compared to the same period, while Russia's shipments were neutral. Iran and Iraq accounted for about 15% - 20% of Singapore's high - sulfur imports, mainly affecting some bunkering and refinery feedstock in the Asia - Pacific region and not eligible for physical delivery on the futures market. It is expected that Iran's shipments will decline in the future due to US sanctions, and if the risk events in the Strait of Hormuz escalate, the impact will be greater. Recently, high - sulfur fuel oil is still in the peak power - generation season, with the overseas market operating strongly. The domestic and foreign near - month contracts of FU are under pressure, with low valuation and continued gaming. For far - month contracts, attention should be paid to the impact of supply disruptions. The domestic and foreign valuations of LU are high [6][7]. 2. Data Summary Rotterdam Fuel Oil Swap Data | Product | Change from 2025/06/20 - 2025/06/26 | | --- | --- | | Rotterdam 3.5% HSF Swap M1 | -0.89 | | Rotterdam 0.5% VLSFO Swap M1 | 5.33 | | Rotterdam HSFO - Brent M1 | -0.75 | | Rotterdam 10ppm Gasoil Swap M1 | 7.43 | | Rotterdam VLSFO - Gasoil M1 | -2.10 | | LGO - Brent M1 | 0.92 | | Rotterdam VLSFO - HSFO M1 | 6.22 | [3] Singapore Fuel Oil Swap Data | Product | Change from 2025/06/20 - 2025/06/26 | | --- | --- | | Singapore 380cst M1 | 2.38 | | Singapore 180cst M1 | 2.16 | | Singapore VLSFO M1 | -3.21 | | Singapore Gasoil M1 | -0.81 | | Singapore 380cst - Brent M1 | 0.89 | | Singapore VLSFO - Gasoil M1 | 2.78 | [3] Singapore Fuel Oil Spot Data | Product | Change from 2025/06/20 - 2025/06/26 | | --- | --- | | FOB 380cst | 3.56 | | FOB VLSFO | -4.12 | | 380 - cst Basis | 2.60 | | High - sulfur Domestic - Foreign Spread | -1.3 | | Low - sulfur Domestic - Foreign Spread | -6.1 | [5] Domestic FU and LU Contract Data | Contract | Change from 2025/06/20 - 2025/06/26 | | --- | --- | | FU 01 | -11 | | FU 05 | -2 | | FU 09 | 4 | | FU 01 - 05 | -9 | | FU 05 - 09 | -6 | | FU 09 - 01 | 15 | | LU 01 | -9 | | LU 05 | 0 | | LU 09 | -16 | | LU 01 - 05 | -9 | | LU 05 - 09 | 16 | | LU 09 - 01 | -7 | [5][6]

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided Core Viewpoints - For PTA, after the near - end TA maintenance, the start - up rate decreased, polyester start - up increased, inventory slightly decreased, basis strengthened again, and spot processing fees improved. In the future, TA inventory start - up will gradually return, and it will enter the inventory accumulation stage. The monthly spread driver may fluctuate greatly between PX inventory depletion and polyester benefit compression [1]. - For MEG, the near - end domestic maintenance continued to resume, the start - up rate continued to rise, Iranian devices stopped intensively, port inventory decreased slightly, and the basis weakened. In the future, the domestic supply will return, and the inventory accumulation amplitude is expected to be limited. It is expected to be in a volatile pattern [7]. - For polyester staple fiber, the start - up rate increased, production and sales remained stable, inventory slightly accumulated. The demand side was weak, but exports maintained a high growth rate. There are also production reduction plans in the future, and the processing fee is expected to remain weak [7]. - For natural rubber and 20 - number rubber, the national explicit inventory remained stable, the price of Thai cup rubber rebounded, and rainfall affected rubber tapping. The recommended strategy is to wait and see [7]. - For styrene, the prices of related products changed, and the domestic profits of some products also changed. A comprehensive analysis of these data is needed for investment decisions [7]. Summary by Product PTA - **Price and Spread Changes**: From June 20 to June 26, 2025, crude oil remained at 67.7, PTA inner - disk spot price decreased from 5275 to 5020, PTA processing difference decreased from 369 to 375, and polyester gross profit increased from - 34 to 256. The basis of daily average transaction was 2509(+254) [1]. - **Device Changes**: Yisheng New Materials with a capacity of 3.6 million tons reduced its load [1]. - **Market Situation**: After the near - end TA maintenance, the start - up rate decreased, polyester start - up increased, inventory slightly decreased, basis strengthened again, and spot processing fees improved. PX domestic start - up remained stable, overseas Middle - East devices had unexpected shutdowns, PXN and its structure strengthened again [1]. - **Future Outlook**: TA inventory start - up will gradually return, and it will enter the inventory accumulation stage. The monthly spread driver may fluctuate greatly between PX inventory depletion and polyester benefit compression [1]. MEG - **Price and Profit Changes**: From June 20 to June 26, 2025, Northeast Asia ethylene remained at 850, MEG inner - disk price decreased from 4594 to 4379, and MEG coal - made profit decreased from 681 to 459. The basis of spot transaction was around 09(+72) [7]. - **Device Changes**: Zhejiang Petrochemical's 800,000 - ton device was under maintenance [7]. - **Market Situation**: The near - end domestic maintenance continued to resume, the start - up rate continued to rise, Iranian devices stopped intensively, port inventory decreased slightly, downstream stocking levels increased slightly, the basis weakened, and coal - made benefits continued to expand [7]. - **Future Outlook**: The domestic supply will return, and the inventory accumulation amplitude is expected to be limited. It is expected to be in a volatile pattern, and attention should be paid to the change of warehouse receipts [7]. Polyester Staple Fiber - **Price and Profit Changes**: From June 20 to June 26, 2025, the price of 1.4D cotton - type staple fiber decreased from 6995 to 6855, and the short - fiber profit increased from - 70 to 79 [7]. - **Device Changes**: Not provided - **Market Situation**: Fujian Jinlun restarted, the start - up rate increased to 95.1%, production and sales remained stable, inventory slightly accumulated. The demand side was weak, but exports maintained a high growth rate [7]. - **Future Outlook**: There are also production reduction plans in the future, and the processing fee is expected to remain weak. Attention should be paid to the implementation of industry production reduction [7]. Natural Rubber and 20 - Number Rubber - **Price Changes**: From June 20 to June 26, 2025, the price of US - dollar Thai standard rubber increased from 1690 to 1700, and the price of Shanghai full - latex increased from 13500 to 13640 [7]. - **Market Situation**: The national explicit inventory remained stable, the price of Thai cup rubber rebounded, and rainfall affected rubber tapping [7]. - **Strategy**: Wait and see [7]. Styrene - **Price and Profit Changes**: From June 20 to June 26, 2025, the price of ethylene (CFR Northeast Asia) remained at 850, the price of pure benzene (CFR China) remained at 748, and the domestic profit of styrene decreased from 140 to 165 [7]. - **Market Situation**: The prices of related products changed, and the domestic profits of some products also changed [7].