1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Since 2025, the announcements of "zeroing out" implicit debts in various regions have become more frequent, and the pace of urban investment platforms exiting the list has significantly accelerated. As of October 30, 2025, 70 regions across the country have officially announced the achievement of implicit debt zeroing out, with district - and county - level units being the main battlefield for debt resolution [1][7]. - The number of financing platforms has decreased by over 70%. Jiangsu Province has the highest number of exits, mainly district - and county - level non - bond - issuing platforms. The next stage of the "exit list" work may focus on higher - level bond - issuing entities [1][12]. - After exiting the list, the credit evaluation of urban investment platforms has entered a new stage of significant differentiation. In the short term, liquidity is crucial; in the medium term, the focus is on hematopoietic ability; in the long term, the key lies in functional positioning [3]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 "One - Package Debt Resolution" Anniversary with Remarkable Achievements and Many Regions Announcing Zero Implicit Debts - Since the introduction of the "one - package debt resolution plan" in November 2024, the local debt resolution work has advanced for nearly a year. By October 30, 2025, 70 regions announced zero implicit debts, including 11 prefecture - level and 59 district - and county - level units [1][7]. - Other regions have also disclosed clear goals for zeroing out implicit debts, such as Shandong aiming for zero implicit debts by the end of 2028 and Shaoxing, Zhejiang achieving zero implicit debts by the end of 2025 [7]. 3.2 Over 70% Reduction in the Number of Financing Platforms and Their Characteristics 3.2.1 Jiangsu Province Has the Most Announced Exit - List Entities, Mainly District - and County - Level Non - Bond - Issuing Entities - As of September 2025, the number of national financing platforms and the scale of outstanding operating financial debts decreased by 71% and 62% respectively compared to March 2023. Among the 447 "exit - list" urban investment entities officially disclosed since 2022, Jiangsu accounted for nearly 70%, followed by Henan with 36, Chongqing with 29, and Qinghai with 13 [12]. - District - and county - level urban investment entities were the main body, and non - bond - issuing entities accounted for 94% [12]. 3.2.2 The Next Stage of the "Exit - List" Work May Focus on Higher - Level Bond - Issuing Entities - The current debt resolution path is to prioritize cleaning up platforms with simple debt relationships and small market impacts. Based on the fact that over 70% of financing platforms have exited, it is estimated that the implicit debts of district - and county - level urban investment in some provinces may have been mostly resolved, and the next stage may focus on higher - level bond - issuing entities [19]. 3.3 Insights into the Transformation Direction of Urban Investment from Asset - Liability Changes 3.3.1 Limited New Bond Issuance after Exiting the List, with Marginal Improvement in Bank Liquidity Support - Among the 447 entities that announced exiting the financing platform list, 420 were non - bond - issuing entities. Focusing on the 27 bond - issuing entities, as of June 30, 2025, only 4 of the 18 entities with outstanding bonds increased their bond scale compared to June 30, 2024 [23]. - According to the semi - annual report data in 2025, the short - term borrowing balance of these exit - list bond - issuing entities increased by 40.61% year - on - year, the bond balance increased slightly by 6%, and the long - term borrowing decreased slightly by 0.72%. The liquidity support from commercial banks for "exit - list" entities has improved [23]. 3.3.2 Changes in Assets and Liabilities of Urban Investment after Exiting the List - **Asset Side**: The pace of project construction has slowed down, and the asset management function has been enhanced. Urban investment enterprises have become more cautious in new project investments. The significant increase in fixed assets may be due to the injection of operating assets by local governments, aiming to enhance the platform's hematopoietic ability [2][29]. - **Liability Side**: Short - term liquidity support is prominent, and the long - term financing function needs to be restored. The growth of long - term borrowing is low. Local governments prioritize liquidity safety, and new project investments are more cautious. Special bonds have replaced some bank medium - and long - term loans to some extent [2][32]. 3.4 How to Evaluate the Credit of Urban Investment after Exiting the List 3.4.1 Market Perception Has Matured, and Valuation and Credit Qualifications Are Becoming More Differentiated - The market reaction has gone through stages from significant initial divergence and limited pricing differentiation to subsequent convergence of expectations and finally entered a new stage of significant differentiation based on individual qualifications. The future market will conduct more refined credit evaluations of exit - list entities [33]. 3.4.2 Reconstruction of the Credit Framework - Short - Term Focus on Liquidity, Medium - Term on Hematopoietic Ability, and Long - Term on Functional Positioning - **Short - term**: The key is to evaluate the thickness of the liquidity safety cushion, including the coverage of short - term debts by monetary funds, available bank credit lines, and the scale of high - quality realizable assets [37]. - **Medium - term**: The core is to examine the transformation effectiveness and independent survival ability of the platform, mainly looking at the proportion of operating business income, profit quality, and net inflow of operating cash flow [38]. - **Long - term**: The key is to determine the platform's irreplaceability in the local economic ecosystem and the sustainability of its business model. Its credit foundation will shift from "implicit government guarantee" to "endogenous value" [38].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing transformation of local government financing platforms in China, highlighting the shift away from reliance on government credit and the implications for the future of these platforms and their operations [1][2][4]. Group 1: Background and Current Developments - Since 2025, many local government financing platforms have announced their exit from government financing, with over 15 platforms making such announcements in October alone [1][2]. - The People's Bank of China and other departments issued a notice in August 2025, mandating the complete exit of local government financing platforms by June 2027, aiming to eliminate hidden local government debt [1][2][4]. - As of September 26, 2025, 114 local financing platforms have officially announced their exit, with Shandong leading with 28 exits [2][3]. Group 2: Reasons for the Transition - The transition is driven by two main factors: the need for compliance with new policies aimed at preventing local debt risks and the internal necessity for financing platforms to evolve into market-oriented entities [4][5]. - Historical data shows that previous rounds of platform exits have led to significant numbers of financing platforms leaving official lists, indicating a pattern of increasing regulatory pressure [5][6]. Group 3: Implications for Financing Platforms - The exit from government financing is seen as a critical step for local financing platforms to become independent market entities, allowing them to engage in public-private partnerships and diversify their business operations [4][8]. - Analysts suggest that the relationship between financing platforms and local governments should not be viewed as entirely severed; rather, a clear delineation of responsibilities is necessary for effective collaboration [7][8]. Group 4: Future Directions and Strategies - Financing platforms are encouraged to enhance their self-sustaining capabilities by shifting focus from large-scale infrastructure projects to sustainable cash-generating market-oriented businesses [11][12]. - Strategies for transformation include optimizing traditional operations, expanding into promising market sectors like renewable energy, and effectively managing existing assets to generate revenue [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant challenges faced by local government financing platforms (城投公司) in China, particularly in the context of the real estate market downturn and the central government's directive for these platforms to exit the real estate sector. Group 1: Challenges Faced by Local Financing Platforms - Many local financing platforms are experiencing severe financial difficulties, with reports of salary cuts and reduced benefits for employees [1][2] - The central government has emphasized the need for a structured exit from the real estate market, indicating that the era of local financing platforms relying on government backing to acquire land and borrow funds is over [3][4][6] - The upcoming debt obligations for real estate companies are substantial, with 534.2 billion yuan due by 2025, and only 220.9 billion yuan raised in new debt, leading to a liquidity crisis [8][9] Group 2: Market Conditions and Impacts - The real estate market is facing a significant downturn, with a 42% drop in sales for the top 100 real estate companies and a 67% decrease in land transfer fees in some cities [9][12] - Local governments are under pressure due to declining land sales, which are critical for funding public services, leading to a tightening of fiscal resources [12][14] - Consumer sentiment is also low, with only 35% of potential buyers planning to purchase a home in the near future, exacerbating the inventory issues faced by local financing platforms [12][14] Group 3: Transition and Future Opportunities - Some local financing platforms have begun to pivot towards new business models, such as asset management through REITs and urban renewal projects, indicating a potential path for survival [14][15] - Successful transitions are being observed in companies like China Resources Land and Yuexiu Property, which are adapting to the changing market dynamics by focusing on renovation and community development rather than new construction [14][15] - The article concludes that while the exit from the real estate market may seem dire, it presents an opportunity for transformation and rebirth for capable local financing platforms [15]

Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information about the report industry investment rating in the provided content. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Since the implementation of the "Comprehensive Debt Resolution Package," against the backdrop of clearing hidden debts, exiting financing platforms, and restricted financing, "Urban Investment Company (UIC) transformation" has become a hot topic again. In 2024, the number of UICs' mergers and acquisitions (M&As) of listed companies increased. However, affected by tightened financing channels and increased financial pressure, the single - transaction amount and premium space for UICs' M&As of listed companies' equity have further shrunk since July 2023. Meanwhile, the total assets and profitability of the acquired listed companies have shown a downward trend. The enthusiasm of district - and - county - level UICs for M&As has declined significantly [2]. - From July 1, 2023, to July 31, 2025, there were 28 M&A events of listed companies by UICs. The acquirer UICs were mainly distributed in regions such as Guangdong, Hubei, and Shandong, with provincial and prefecture - level UICs as the main players. District - and - county - level UICs, although with a small proportion, were also mainly located in economically developed regions like Guangdong and Shandong. Most of the acquired listed companies were small - market - capitalization, low - asset, and poorly - performing enterprises. Half of the UICs' M&As of listed companies were indirect and cross - regional, nearly half of the single - transaction amounts were less than 500 million yuan, over 60% were acquisitions at a discount, and nearly 60% of the UICs' shareholding ratios in the acquired listed companies were less than 20% [2]. - UICs' M&As of listed companies present both opportunities and challenges. UICs can achieve resource integration, diversify business layouts, enhance profitability, and preserve and increase the value of state - owned assets through M&As. For the government, M&As can introduce new industries, promote local industrial chains, and attract more enterprises, bringing GDP, tax revenue, and employment benefits. However, M&As also face risks such as high acquisition prices, goodwill impairment, poor performance of listed companies, and integration risks. Therefore, UICs should focus on business synergy, conduct strategic planning and due diligence, improve transaction structure settings, and effectively integrate the acquired listed companies after the M&A [2]. Summary According to the Directory 1. Main Concerns - UICs mainly engage in government - related businesses, with few market - oriented operations, and have problems such as poor asset quality and insufficient self - generating capabilities. Against the backdrop of the "Comprehensive Debt Resolution Package," M&A of listed companies is one of the effective ways for UICs to carry out market - oriented operations [3]. 2. Observation of the Characteristics of UICs' M&As of Listed Companies - **Trend of M&A Events**: In 2019, the number of UICs' M&As of listed companies began to increase, reaching 21 transactions. After that, it decreased but remained relatively stable. In 2024, the number of completed M&As slightly increased to 15. From July 1, 2023, to July 31, 2025, there were 16 ongoing M&A events, but the completion rate of M&A events initiated by UICs in 2025 was low, and the M&A progress slowed down [5]. - **Regional Distribution of Acquirer UICs**: Compared with the historical sample, the number of M&A events by Hubei's UICs increased significantly during the observation period. UICs from economically developed regions such as Guangdong, Shandong, and Zhejiang were still the main players. In terms of the number of M&A events, Hubei and Guangdong ranked first and second, with 6 and 5 events respectively, accounting for 21.43% and 17.86% of all M&A events. In terms of transaction amount, Guangdong, Hubei, and Zhejiang ranked in the top three, with Guangdong's transaction amount reaching 7.363 billion yuan, accounting for 23.00% of the total [6][7]. - **Administrative Hierarchy of Acquirer UICs**: Due to the implementation of the "Comprehensive Debt Resolution Package," the enthusiasm of district - and - county - level UICs for M&As decreased significantly, while the proportion of provincial - level UICs' M&As increased. During the observation period, there were 10 provincial - level M&A events, accounting for 35.71% of the total, with a corresponding transaction amount of 15.921 billion yuan, accounting for about half of the total. There were 13 prefecture - level M&A events, accounting for nearly half of the total, with a transaction amount of 11.739 billion yuan, accounting for 36.66% of the total. There were only 5 district - and - county - level M&A events, accounting for 17.86% of the total, with a transaction amount of 4.358 billion yuan, accounting for 13.61% of the total. Compared with the historical sample, the proportion of provincial - level UICs' M&A events increased by 15.42 percentage points, and that of district - and - county - level UICs decreased by 11.13 percentage points [9]. - **Credit Rating of Acquirer UICs**: Since 2019, the credit ratings of acquirer UICs have been concentrated at AA+ and above. Among the observation - period samples, 26 UICs had public credit ratings, all of which were AA+ and above, and AAA - rated UICs led in terms of transaction volume and transaction amount [10]. - **Characteristics of Acquired Listed Companies**: The acquired listed companies were mainly distributed in economically developed regions such as Jiangsu and Guangdong. They were mostly small - market - capitalization, low - asset, and poorly - performing enterprises. Nearly half of their market capitalizations were below 5 billion yuan, more than half of their asset sizes were below 3 billion yuan, and more than 40% were in a loss - making state. Compared with the historical sample, the total assets and profitability of the acquired listed companies showed a downward trend during the observation period [13]. - **Transaction Characteristics**: Half of the UICs' M&As of listed companies were indirect and cross - regional. Nearly half of the single - transaction amounts were less than 500 million yuan, and over 60% were acquisitions at a discount. Nearly 60% of the UICs' shareholding ratios in the acquired listed companies were less than 20%, and they mainly obtained actual control through methods such as waiver of voting rights, voting rights delegation, and joint concerted action. Compared with the historical sample, since the implementation of the "Comprehensive Debt Resolution Package," UICs' M&As of listed companies' equity have become more inclined to indirect acquisitions, and the single - transaction amount and premium space have further shrunk [19]. 3. Case Studies and Insights - **Case 1: Tangshan Industrial Holding Group Co., Ltd. (formerly Tangshan Financial Holding Industry Development Group Co., Ltd.)'s M&A of Fengfan Co., Ltd.**: After the M&A, Tangshan Industrial Holding Group's business structure was optimized and diversified. Fengfan Co., Ltd.'s business helped Tangshan Industrial Holding Group improve its layout in the new energy sector. The M&A also promoted the growth of Tangshan Industrial Holding Group's operating income, but its profitability needs to be enhanced. However, there were also risks such as potential instability of control rights and high - premium M&A, and the fulfillment of performance commitments needs continuous attention [27][29][32]. - **Case 2: Maoming Port Group Co., Ltd.'s M&A of Maohua Shihua Co., Ltd.**: The M&A had high business synergy in petrochemical storage and port logistics. After the M&A, Maohua Shihua achieved phased improvement, but its non - profitable operation still needs attention. UICs' M&As for the purpose of rescuing listed companies may face the risk of increased financial pressure if the improvement effect is limited [33][34]. 4. Extended Thinking - UICs should focus on business synergy when M&A listed companies, conduct in - depth due diligence to avoid valuation risks, improve transaction structure settings to ensure the stability of control rights, and effectively integrate the acquired listed companies after the M&A to avoid integration and management risks [38][39][40].

Core Insights - The implementation of the "comprehensive debt reduction plan" has led to an increase in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involving urban investment companies and listed companies, particularly from July 2023 to July 2025, despite tightening financing channels and increasing financial pressure [2][3][6] Group 1: M&A Characteristics - From July 1, 2023, to July 31, 2025, there were 28 M&A transactions involving urban investment companies, with a total transaction amount of 32.018 billion yuan [9] - The majority of acquiring urban investment companies are located in economically developed regions such as Guangdong, Hubei, and Shandong, with a focus on provincial and municipal levels [3][10] - The acquired listed companies are predominantly small-cap, low-asset firms with poor profitability, with nearly half having a market value below 5 billion yuan and over 40% reporting losses [3][13][16] Group 2: Transaction Features - Approximately half of the M&A transactions were indirect and cross-regional, with nearly 60% of the acquisitions being at a shareholding ratio of less than 20% [16][18] - The average transaction amount has decreased, with nearly half of the transactions being below 500 million yuan, and over 60% being conducted at a discount [16][20] - The pricing of M&A transactions has shifted towards lower premiums, with 64.28% of transactions falling within a price range of -20% to +20% [20][22] Group 3: Strategic Implications - Urban investment companies can leverage M&A to diversify their business, enhance profitability, and preserve the value of state-owned assets, while also contributing to local economic development [4][30] - The government benefits from these M&A activities as they can attract new industries and enhance local investment appeal, leading to increased GDP, tax revenue, and employment [4][30] - However, M&A activities also face challenges such as high acquisition prices, potential goodwill impairment, and operational risks post-acquisition [4][31] Group 4: Case Studies - Case 1: Tangshan Industrial Holding Group's acquisition of Fengfan Holdings demonstrates how urban investment companies can diversify their operations and enhance market competitiveness through strategic M&A [23][24] - Case 2: Maoming Port Group's acquisition of Maohua Shihua highlights the potential for urban investment companies to support struggling firms and improve their operational performance through financial assistance [28][29]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the transformation of the government financing system in China, evidenced by the contrasting trends in local government bond (城投债) financing and government bond financing, indicating a tightening of local government debt issuance while increasing government bond financing to support economic growth [1][2]. Group 1: Local Government Bonds - In the first half of 2025, the net financing of local government bonds was -76.36 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of approximately 149% [1]. - The supply of local government bonds continues to tighten, reflecting the government's efforts to control new hidden debts and mitigate local debt risks [1][2]. - The transformation of local government financing platforms is progressing slowly, with over 7,000 local government financing companies announcing their exit from the government financing platform list last year [1]. Group 2: Government Bonds - In contrast, the net financing of government bonds reached 766 billion yuan in the first half of 2025, an increase of 432 billion yuan year-on-year, representing a growth of approximately 129% [1][2]. - The significant increase in government bond financing is a response to the need for increased debt funding for major projects amidst complex domestic and international conditions [2]. - The net financing of national bonds was 337 billion yuan, and local government bonds was 429 billion yuan in the first half of 2025, with both figures showing substantial year-on-year increases [2]. Group 3: Policy and Economic Impact - The article notes that the decline in local government bond issuance and the increase in government bond financing are indicative of proactive fiscal policies aimed at ensuring economic stability [2]. - Infrastructure investment grew by 4.6% year-on-year in the first half of 2025, outpacing overall investment growth by 1.8 percentage points, supported by the accelerated issuance of special local government bonds and long-term special treasury bonds [2]. - The ongoing efforts to resolve local government debt and the transformation of local financing platforms are expected to continue, although challenges remain regarding the quality of these transformations and the potential for increased debt burdens [3].

Group 1: Report Investment Rating - No information provided regarding the industry investment rating Group 2: Core Viewpoints - In H1 2025, the urban investment bond market continued the 2024 policy line, with short - term debt resolution showing results, "exiting the platform" and urban investment transformation accelerating. However, in the long run, urban investment financing channels are restricted, and liquidity pressure in some regions is not fully alleviated. It is expected that implicit debt resolution, "exiting key provinces" and "exiting the platform" will accelerate, and the industrial transformation of urban investment enterprises will further speed up, but attention should be paid to the risks during the transformation process [4] - The overall supply of urban investment bonds tightened in H1 2025, with a year - on - year decline in issuance and net financing. Yields fluctuated downward, and the difference in yields among different credit - rated bonds widened. The net financing of low - level and low - rated issuers remained weak, and the financing pressure on weak - quality urban investment enterprises persisted [3][4] Group 3: Summary of Each Section I. National Urban Investment Bond Overall Issuance Overview and Characteristics in H1 and Q2 2025 - **Issuance and Net Financing**: Under the "controlling increment and resolving stock" policy, the issuance policy remained strictly regulated. In H1 2025, 4,339 urban investment bonds were issued, with a total issuance of 2.808708 trillion yuan and a net financing of - 76.36 billion yuan. The total issuance decreased by 11.55% year - on - year, and net financing decreased by 149.16% year - on - year. The net financing turned negative, and the supply tightened. Monthly issuance showed a decline in April and May and a recovery in June [3][6] - **Yield and Cost**: Yields fluctuated downward, and the difference in yields among different credit - rated bonds widened. The issuance cost decreased significantly, and the number of cancelled issuances decreased since April. High - interest urban investment bonds were mainly in regions with negative public opinions and weak economic and fiscal strength. The issuance of ultra - long - term (10 - year and above) urban investment bonds increased year - on - year, mainly in developed provincial capitals, with AAA ratings and mainly medium - term notes and private placement bonds [3][8] - **Issuer Characteristics**: The issuance and net financing of all types of issuers decreased year - on - year. Low - level and low - rated issuers had weak net financing, especially district - level urban investment enterprises whose net financing gap continued to expand. In H1 2025, the net financing of AA - rated enterprises was the weakest, and the net financing of AA+ enterprises turned negative in Q2 [3][15] - **Regional Distribution**: Jiangsu, Shandong, and Zhejiang were the top three provinces in terms of issuance amount, but the net financing of Jiangsu and Zhejiang was negative. Key provinces' debt resolution advanced steadily, with a decline in issuance and a narrowing net financing gap, showing internal differentiation. Non - key provinces' net financing turned negative [4][18][19] - **New Issuance**: New issuances were mainly in regions with economic, fiscal, or industrial advantages. Key provinces had fewer new issuances. In H1 2025, 252 new bonds were issued, with a total amount of 203.225 billion yuan, mainly by AAA and AA+ enterprises [4][23] II. Concerns in the Current Urban Investment Bond Market - **Short - term Debt Resolution and Transformation**: In H1 2025, the market continued the 2024 policy line. Short - term debt resolution was effective, and urban investment transformation accelerated. However, fiscal pressure remained, and the effects of policies needed further observation [27][28] - **Differentiated Debt Resolution Progress**: The progress of debt resolution varied across regions. The "exiting the platform" process accelerated, and the non - standard risk and bill overdue events of urban investment enterprises decreased marginally. Key provinces advanced faster in debt resolution, and non - key provinces also made progress but faced challenges in reducing high - interest debts [32][33] - **Marketization Transformation Risks**: The transformation of urban investment enterprises was accelerating, but there was a risk of "false transformation", which could lead to capital recovery risks and drag on regional development. Attention should be paid to the reconstruction of government - enterprise relations and the debt burden caused by "heavy investment, light output" [34][37]

Core Insights - Local investment companies are increasingly entering the county catering market, leveraging their government-backed credibility and financial resources to disrupt the traditional market dominated by small local enterprises [1][3][10] - The county catering market, which accounts for nearly 60% of the national population, presents significant growth potential for external dining consumption, attracting various stakeholders [3][10] - The entry of local investment companies is a strategic choice driven by their need for stable revenue and cash flow, aligning with the unique characteristics of the county market [9][10] Group 1: Market Dynamics - Local investment companies have successfully won multiple projects in the county catering market due to their advantages such as "zero deposit" and strong financial backing [1][6] - The traditional county catering market is characterized by a fragmented structure, with local enterprises struggling to maintain operations due to limited resources [1][6] - The influx of local investment companies is reshaping the competitive landscape, posing challenges to small local catering businesses that rely on government contracts [12][14] Group 2: Opportunities and Challenges - The presence of local investment companies can lead to improved food safety and standardized operations through centralized kitchens and unified procurement [11][12] - However, this also creates significant pressure on local small catering enterprises, which may be pushed to the margins of the market due to resource disparities [14][15] - The competition may become unfair if bidding rules do not adequately consider the advantages held by local investment companies, leading to a sense of helplessness among smaller firms [15][18] Group 3: Strategic Recommendations - Local governments should ensure fair competition by preventing the misuse of non-market resources and maintaining transparency in the bidding process [19][21] - Local investment companies should focus on creating social value and supporting the entire supply chain rather than solely seeking profit through operational rights [22] - Small catering enterprises need to adapt their strategies by targeting niche markets that are less covered by larger players, such as community catering and personalized meal services [23][24] Group 4: Regulatory Considerations - Continuous market monitoring and evaluation mechanisms should be established to ensure fair competition and prevent monopolistic behaviors [26] - A clear and transparent market environment is essential for the sustainable development of the county catering industry, benefiting all stakeholders involved [27]

Core Insights - The cash flow of urban investment companies has improved in 2024, indicating progress in market-oriented transformation and debt reduction [1][2][3] - The net cash flow from operating activities reached 0.81 trillion yuan, marking the first positive net cash flow in five years [1][2] - Urban investment companies are focusing on cash flow management and diversifying income sources to enhance asset utilization and profitability [2][3] Group 1: Cash Flow Improvement - By the end of 2024, urban investment companies' cash inflow reached 23.59 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 1.06% [1][2] - Nearly 80% of key provincial urban investment companies reported positive cash flow, with a year-on-year increase of 2.33% [3] - The shift in focus from being service providers to comprehensive urban operators is evident, with companies exploring community services to enhance cash flow [3] Group 2: Long-term Equity Investment - Urban investment companies are increasingly engaging in long-term equity investments, with a total scale of 6.5 trillion yuan by the end of 2024, a 12.3% increase from 2023 [6] - Despite the growth in investment scale, net investment income decreased by 6.77% year-on-year to 0.31 trillion yuan [6] - The rationale behind long-term equity investments includes business expansion, profit enhancement, and alignment with regional industrial policies [7] Group 3: Market-oriented Transformation - The transformation of urban investment companies into local state-owned capital operation platforms is gaining traction, focusing on equity and fund investments [7] - Companies are leveraging strong relationships with local governments to participate in industry guidance and enterprise cultivation [7] - The ongoing reforms aim to push local financing platforms to exit by over 50% by mid-2025, indicating a significant shift in operational strategy [5]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The "15th Five - Year Plan" period will be a new turning point for the urban investment industry. Urban investment enterprises need to seize development opportunities, use relevant policies, and address long - standing issues such as low profitability, poor asset quality, high debt pressure, and heavy reliance on local government resources [3][4]. - In 2024, under the "package debt resolution" policy, urban investment enterprises showed some positive changes, but the substantial improvement of the overall fundamentals still needs further observation. Key provinces achieved certain debt - resolution results, but their profitability, investment, and financing capabilities were weaker than other regions, and the debt - repayment pressure was prominent [2][15]. - Urban investment enterprises in the process of transformation need to pay attention to issues such as insufficient profitability in the initial stage, low asset quality, and high debt pressure, and promote the smooth transition between old and new businesses [5][6]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs Asset Side - The expansion speed of urban investment enterprises was lower than the growth rate of social financing, and assets were concentrated towards the top. The asset growth rate of urban investment enterprises in key provinces slowed down significantly. By the end of 2024, the total asset scale of urban investment enterprises reached 162.70 trillion yuan, with a year - on - year growth of 5.31%, lower than the social financing growth rate of 8% in 2024 [8][17]. - The liquidity of urban investment assets weakened. The scale of monetary funds decreased significantly, and the scale and proportion of accounts receivable increased. By the end of 2024, the total scale of monetary funds of urban investment enterprises was 7.59 trillion yuan, a year - on - year decrease of 8.65% [24]. - Due to investment constraints, infrastructure business was restricted, and the growth rate of inventory slowed down. The scale of construction - in - progress projects of urban investment enterprises in key provinces decreased. In 2024, the inventory growth rate of urban investment enterprises was only 3.24%, a significant decrease of 5.46 percentage points [30][33]. Liability Side - The growth rate of debt scale slowed down. The asset - liability ratio and the scale of interest - bearing debt of urban investment enterprises in key provinces decreased for the first time. By the end of 2024, the total liability scale of urban investment enterprises reached 101.13 trillion yuan, with a year - on - year growth of 6.33%, and the growth rate decreased by 5.19 percentage points compared with 2023 [38][40]. - The financing cost of urban investment enterprises increased slightly but was still in a downward channel. The cost in key provinces decreased more significantly but was still relatively high. In 2024, the median financing cost of urban investment enterprises was 5.16%, a slight increase of 9BP compared with 2023 [46]. - The scale and proportion of non - standard financing of urban investment enterprises "double - dropped", and the debt structure of urban investment enterprises in key provinces improved significantly. In 2024, the proportion of non - standard financing of urban investment enterprises dropped to 8.57%, a decrease of 1.19 percentage points [49]. Cash Flow - The net cash flow from operating activities turned positive for the first time in five years, and nearly 80% of urban investment enterprises in key provinces had positive cash flow net. In 2024, the net cash flow from operating activities of urban investment enterprises was 0.81 trillion yuan, turning positive for the first time in five years [12][53]. - The cash outflow from investment activities slowed down. Urban investment in key provinces was more restricted, but long - term equity investment improved. In 2024, the cash outflow from investment activities of urban investment enterprises was 8.72 trillion yuan, a year - on - year decrease of 4.49% [12][56]. - The cash inflow from financing activities was under pressure, and the net amount decreased. Urban investment financing in key provinces was more restricted. In 2024, the cash inflow from financing activities of urban investment enterprises was 29.98 trillion yuan, with a year - on - year growth of 5.27%, and the growth rate decreased significantly by 6.53 percentage points [13][61]. Debt - Repayment Ability - The debt - repayment ability of urban investment enterprises continued to decline, and urban investment enterprises in key provinces faced greater debt - repayment pressure. In 2024, the current ratio, the coverage ratio of monetary funds to short - term debt, and the EBITDA interest coverage ratio of all urban investment enterprises were 2.41, 0.30, and 2.72 respectively [65]. - The debt - repayment ability of entities facing the maturity or put - back of urban investment bonds in 2025 tended to weaken. From May to December 2025, the entities facing the maturity or put - back of urban investment bonds were mainly AAA - rated and municipal - level. The maturity pressure in key provinces such as Heilongjiang and Gansu was relatively large [69].