Market Overview - The A-share market showed mixed performance on July 24, with the Shanghai Composite Index breaking the 3600-point mark during the session [1] - By the close, the Shanghai Composite Index rose by 0.65% to 3605.73 points, the Sci-Tech Innovation 50 Index increased by 1.17% to 1032.84 points, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 1.21% to 11193.06 points, and the ChiNext Index climbed 1.5% to 2345.37 points [3] Trading Activity - A total of 4391 stocks rose while 911 stocks fell, with 113 stocks remaining flat across the two exchanges and the Beijing Stock Exchange [4] - The total trading volume for the two exchanges was 184.47 billion yuan, a decrease of 19.9 billion yuan from the previous trading day [4] Sector Performance - The steel sector showed strong performance, with stocks like Baogang Co. and Hainan Mining hitting the daily limit, while other steel stocks rose over 3% [5] - The retail sector also performed well, with companies like China Duty Free and Bubugao reaching the daily limit, and several others increasing by over 3% [5] - The non-ferrous metals sector was notable, with stocks such as Longmag Technology and Tibet Mining hitting the daily limit or rising over 10% [5] - Conversely, banking stocks underperformed, with several banks declining over 2% [5] Market Sentiment and Future Outlook - Financial analysts suggest that the market is currently experiencing structural rotation opportunities, with a focus on old infrastructure and technology sectors [8] - The market is showing resilience to negative news and responding positively to favorable news, indicating a potential for a sustained upward trend [8] - There is a bullish sentiment in the market, although some analysts caution about the possibility of short-term adjustments following recent gains [8]

Core Viewpoint - The recent surge in insurance capital's stock acquisitions, marking a new wave of investment activity, reflects a strategic shift in asset allocation and operational adjustments in response to the evolving economic landscape [2][18][19]. Group 1: Insurance Capital Activity - Insurance companies have initiated a record 21 stock acquisitions as of July 22, surpassing the total for 2021-2023 and setting a five-year high [2][10]. - The latest acquisitions include significant purchases by Zhongyin Life and Taikang Life, with Zhongyin acquiring 726,000 shares of Green Power Environmental, reaching a 5.0722% stake [7][6]. - The trend of stock acquisitions has been consistent, with four instances occurring in July alone, indicating a robust interest from various insurance firms [5][6]. Group 2: Investment Strategy and Market Conditions - The current investment strategy emphasizes high-dividend stocks and long-term equity investments, driven by a low-interest-rate environment and new financial regulations [11][18]. - The insurance sector is increasingly focusing on stable, high-yield investments to enhance returns, with a notable shift towards equities as a means to navigate low returns from traditional fixed-income assets [18][19]. - The ongoing policy support for long-term investments is expected to further expand the space for equity asset allocation among insurance companies [19][22]. Group 3: Historical Context and Future Outlook - This marks the third wave of stock acquisitions in the past decade, with previous surges occurring in 2015 and 2020, indicating a cyclical pattern in investment behavior [8][9]. - Although the current annual acquisition count has not yet surpassed the previous waves, the duration and total volume of acquisitions since 2024 have already exceeded the second wave [9]. - The focus on banking stocks remains prominent, with significant investments in major banks, reflecting their stable operations and attractive dividend yields [12][10].

Report Industry Investment Ratings No investment ratings for the industry are provided in the report. Core Views The report presents the price trends and outlooks for various commodities on July 23, 2025. Different commodities are expected to have different trends, including upward, downward, and sideways movements, influenced by factors such as macro - economic conditions, supply - demand relationships, and policy expectations [2][4]. Summary by Commodity Precious Metals - **Gold**: Expected to move upward in a sideways manner, with a trend strength of 1 [2][7][8]. - **Silver**: Expected to break through and move upward, with a trend strength of 1 [2][7][8]. Base Metals - **Copper**: Domestic spot prices are firm, providing support for the price, with a trend strength of 1 [2][10][12]. - **Zinc**: Expected to have small - scale sideways movements, with a trend strength of 0 [2][13][14]. - **Lead**: There are still expected supply - demand contradictions, and the price has support, with a trend strength of 0 [2][16][17]. - **Tin**: The price is weakening, with a trend strength of - 1 [2][19][22]. - **Aluminum**: Expected to move sideways within a range, with a trend strength of 0; Alumina is expected to move upward in a sideways manner, with a trend strength of 1; Cast aluminum alloy follows the trend of electrolytic aluminum, with a trend strength of 0 [2][23][25]. - **Nickel**: Macro - economic sentiment boosts expectations, but reality limits the upside potential, with a trend strength of 0; Stainless steel is mainly influenced by macro - economic sentiment at the margin, and fundamentals determine the upside potential, with a trend strength of 0 [2][26][30]. Energy and Chemicals - **Carbonate Lithium**: The commodity sentiment is positive, and it is expected to move strongly in a sideways manner, with a trend strength of 1 [2][31][33]. - **Industrial Silicon**: Market sentiment is high, and attention should be paid to the risk of reaching the daily limit; the trend strength is 2. - **Polysilicon**: Policy expectations are getting stronger, and the price is unlikely to fall, with a trend strength of 1 [2][34][36]. - **Iron Ore**: Supported by macro - economic expectations, it is expected to move strongly in a sideways manner, with a trend strength of 0 [2][37]. - **Rebar and Hot - Rolled Coil**: Driven by macro - economic sentiment, they are expected to move strongly in a sideways manner, with a trend strength of 1 for both [2][41][44]. - **Silicon Ferrosilicon and Manganese Silico - Manganese**: Driven by the macro - economic market, they are expected to move strongly in a sideways manner, with a trend strength of 1 for both [2][46][48]. - **Coke**: The second - round price increase has been implemented, and it is expected to move strongly in a sideways manner, with a trend strength of 1; Coking coal is restricted by supply - policy expectations, and it is expected to move strongly in a sideways manner, with a trend strength of 1 [2][50][52]. - **Steam Coal**: Daily consumption is recovering, and the price is expected to stabilize in a sideways manner, with a trend strength of 0 [2][54][57]. Agricultural and Livestock Products - **Palm Oil**: Boosted by macro - economic factors, but caution should be exercised regarding sentiment reversal. - **Soybean Oil**: Follows the trend of the oilseed sector but is relatively weak among varieties. - **Soybean Meal**: Market sentiment is strong, and the price is expected to move strongly in a sideways manner. - **Soybean No. 1**: Technically, it is expected to move strongly in a sideways manner. - **Corn**: Expected to move sideways. - **Sugar**: Expected to have narrow - range consolidation. - **Cotton**: Attention should be paid to changes in market sentiment. - **Egg**: The peak season arrives first, and the sentiment for culling hens decreases. - **Live Pig**: Macro - economic sentiment is strong, waiting for verification at the end of the month. - **Peanut**: Expected to move sideways [4]. Others - **Log**: Expected to have repeated sideways movements [2][58].

Group 1 - Canada has imposed a 25% tariff on Chinese steel, which has led to a loss of market share, while Australia is set to secure a new canola trade agreement with China, marking the end of years of trade freeze [1][11][15] - China's canola seed inventory has reached a low point, and Australia's nearshore supply capability allows for quick delivery to China, filling the gap left by Canada [3][23] - Canada's agricultural sector is facing severe drought, and the loss of canola exports to China exacerbates its economic challenges [11][29] Group 2 - Canada's actions appear to be a strategic move to appease the U.S., but this has resulted in economic isolation and a loss of significant agricultural contracts with China [7][15] - In contrast, Australia has shifted its approach under the Albanese government, focusing on national interests and re-establishing trade relations with China, leading to the removal of over 20 billion AUD in trade barriers [19][21] - The geographical advantage of Australia allows for faster shipping times to China compared to Canada, making Australian canola more competitive [23][31] Group 3 - China's market power and diversified supply sources, including increased imports from Russia and Kazakhstan, provide it with strong bargaining leverage in international trade [27][29] - China's domestic agricultural production is improving, ensuring stability in its supply chain despite external pressures [29][32] - The evolving agricultural trade landscape indicates a shift towards greater autonomy and diversification for China, allowing it to maintain control over its economic strategies [32]

Group 1 - Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a 25% tariff on Chinese steel, aiming to protect the domestic steel industry amid rising U.S. tariffs [1][3] - Carney's decision is seen as a move to appease the domestic steel industry while risking the agricultural sector, which heavily relies on China for exports [3][4] - The Canadian steel industry is significantly dependent on the U.S. market, with 90% of its exports going there, while the agricultural sector relies on China for 70% of canola seed exports [3][5] Group 2 - The tariff policy exhibits a double standard, as Canada grants exemptions to U.S. and Mexican imports while imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods [5][6] - Canadian steel companies express concerns that the tariffs will not significantly impact Chinese imports, as they only account for 8% of total imports, potentially leading to higher prices for consumers [6][8] - The Canadian government’s $1 billion fund for the steel industry is viewed as insufficient compared to the estimated $4.5 billion loss in the agricultural sector due to retaliatory tariffs from China [8][9] Group 3 - Chinese companies are adapting by utilizing transshipment routes to circumvent tariffs, significantly reducing their costs [6][7] - The Canadian construction industry is already feeling the impact of rising steel prices, with costs increasing by 15% following the tariff announcement [6][9] - The overall economic strategy of Canada under Carney is criticized for being overly reliant on a single market, leading to vulnerabilities in both the steel and agricultural sectors [8][10] Group 4 - The global trade environment is increasingly characterized by protectionism, which is detrimental to consumers and businesses alike, as evidenced by rising prices and lost market share [10][11] - The Canadian government's approach is seen as short-sighted, potentially leading to long-term economic harm while failing to diversify trade relationships [10][11] - The situation highlights the risks of aligning too closely with U.S. policies, as Canada may find itself marginalized in the global market [11]

Group 1 - Canada has announced an expansion of steel import tariffs, effective from August 1, to address U.S. steel tariffs and global overcapacity, while excluding the U.S. from these tariffs [1][3] - The new tariffs include a 25% additional tax on steel products containing Chinese melted and cast steel, indicating Canada's alignment with U.S. trade policies against China [3][5] - Canada's actions are seen as an attempt to appease the U.S. and support the return of American manufacturing, despite the negative impact on its own steel industry [3][5] Group 2 - The recent tariff measures raise questions about Canada's commitment to constructive dialogue with China, as expressed by Canadian Foreign Minister Anand at the ASEAN meeting [6] - China has significant trade relations with Canada, particularly in canola, with annual trade worth approximately $2 billion, and Canada has been a major supplier of canola to China [8] - The potential shift of canola trade to Australia, following recent agreements, could negatively impact Canada's agricultural exports to China [8][11]

Group 1 - As of July 22, 2025, the dividend progress of constituent stocks in major indices shows that 40 companies in the SSE 50 Index have distributed dividends, while 3 companies have not [1] - In the CSI 300 Index, 221 companies have distributed dividends, and 26 companies have not [1] - The CSI 500 Index has 370 companies that have distributed dividends, with 77 companies not distributing [1] - The CSI 1000 Index has 735 companies that have distributed dividends, while 210 companies have not [1] Group 2 - The current dividend yield statistics indicate that the coal, banking, and steel industries rank the highest in terms of dividend yield [4] - The realized dividend yields as of July 22, 2025, are 2.04% for the SSE 50 Index, 1.56% for the CSI 300 Index, 1.09% for the CSI 500 Index, and 0.86% for the CSI 1000 Index [6][49] - The remaining dividend yields are 0.17% for the SSE 50 Index, 0.27% for the CSI 300 Index, 0.15% for the CSI 500 Index, and 0.07% for the CSI 1000 Index [6] Group 3 - The annualized premium for the IH main contract is 3.30%, while the IF main contract has a premium of 2.68%. The IC main contract shows a discount of 5.68%, and the IM main contract has a discount of 9.94% as of July 22, 2025 [1] - The tracking of index futures premium and discount levels is essential for understanding market sentiment and risk preferences among institutional investors [2] Group 4 - The methodology for estimating dividend points in index futures is crucial for accurately assessing the premium and discount levels of futures contracts [28] - The report emphasizes the importance of considering the impact of constituent stock dividends on index point levels when calculating futures premiums [2][28]

Domestic Policy News - The State Council held a meeting on July 16 to discuss strengthening the domestic circulation, emphasizing the need for optimized policy design and collaboration among departments to promote economic stability and growth [9][10][11] - The National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference convened a meeting on July 18 to analyze the macroeconomic situation for the first half of 2025, highlighting the importance of maintaining employment, enterprises, and market stability amid a complex international environment [11][12] Overseas Policy News - On July 17, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the "Genius Act," establishing a regulatory framework for digital stablecoins, marking a significant legislative reform in cryptocurrency regulation [2][14] - Data from the U.S. Treasury revealed that in May 2025, Japan and the UK increased their holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds, while China continued to reduce its holdings for the third consecutive month [16][20] Equity Market Analysis - A-shares experienced a slight increase in mid-July, driven by better-than-expected economic growth in the first half and policies encouraging long-term capital inflow [22][23] - The MSCI China A-share index rose by 1.2% in the third week of July, while the Southbound capital maintained a net inflow of nearly 20 billion yuan [22][23] Fixed Income Market Analysis - The People's Bank of China indicated a commitment to increasing monetary easing, with a net injection of 9.749 billion yuan into the market through open market operations [3][21] - The central bank's policies have shown a positive impact on supporting the real economy, with a notable increase in the effectiveness of monetary policy [3][21] Commodity Market Analysis - The prices of non-ferrous metals showed a slight rebound, while crude oil prices experienced a minor decline [3][21] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced the implementation of a work plan to stabilize growth in ten key industries, including steel and non-ferrous metals [3][21] Foreign Exchange Market Analysis - The U.S. dollar index strengthened slightly, closing at 98.46 on July 18, while the renminbi faced depreciation pressure, trading at 7.18 [4][20] - A joint announcement from seven departments encouraged foreign investment in domestic reinvestment, aiming to enhance the investment environment [4][20] Major Asset Rotation Outlook - The report anticipates further fiscal expansion and moderate monetary easing in the second half of the year, with a focus on structural adjustments to address uncertainties from U.S. trade policies and geopolitical risks [4][20]

Group 1 - Canada announced a 25% tariff on steel and related products from China to protect its domestic industry from an influx of foreign steel following U.S. tariffs [1][3] - The Canadian government is responding to U.S. trade policies, particularly those imposed by the Trump administration, which have included tariffs ranging from 35% to 50% on various Canadian products [3][5] - The decision to target China is seen as a strategic move to demonstrate a tough stance externally while attempting to appease domestic dissatisfaction and signal cooperation to the U.S. [5][7] Group 2 - China is the largest steel producer globally and a significant source of steel imports for Canada, accounting for over 10% of Canada's steel imports last year, which could lead to increased costs for Canadian industries [5][7] - China's potential retaliatory measures include imposing punitive tariffs on Canadian agricultural products, which could severely impact Canada's agricultural sector that relies heavily on the Chinese market [7][9] - The evolving trade dynamics indicate a broader trend of countries aligning against China, with Canada’s actions reflecting this shift in international trade relations [7][9]

Group 1 - Canada imposes a 25% tariff on all steel products containing "Chinese smelting and casting," while exempting U.S. steel imports, claiming to protect domestic steel manufacturers [1][3] - The Canadian government faces backlash from farmers as China retaliates by canceling a CAD 4.9 billion (approximately RMB 26 billion) canola order, leading to a significant drop in canola futures prices [1][5] - Canadian steel imports are projected to be CAD 16 billion in 2024, with only 10% coming from China, contradicting claims of "Chinese dumping" [3][5] Group 2 - The new regulations are perceived as a "protection fee" to the U.S., as Canada responds to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum by targeting China [5][9] - Canadian farmers are struggling with unsold canola, with reports of warehouses overflowing and significant financial losses due to the sudden policy shift [7][12] - Australia quickly capitalizes on the situation by signing agreements to supply canola to China, benefiting from the void left by Canada [7][12] Group 3 - Canadian provincial leaders and farmers express frustration over the government's handling of trade relations, with calls for action to support the agricultural sector [9][11] - The Canadian government faces criticism for prioritizing political relations with the U.S. over the economic well-being of its farmers [9][12] - The International Monetary Fund warns that the trade tensions could lead to a 0.8% contraction in Canada's GDP [12]