8月22日下午两点半，债券市场持续下探，哀鸿遍野。十年期国债活跃券收益率上行超过2个基点，而30 年期国债更是岌岌可危，难掩颓势。 当日，财政部发行了高达830亿元的30年期特别国债，中标利率虽提高至2.15%，但全场认购倍数仅为 2.89倍，市场反应冷淡，机构投资者参与意愿低迷。与年初国债发行时机构争相抢购、认购倍数轻松突 破3倍甚至4倍的盛况相比，如今即便收益率有所提升，市场却反而望而却步，这其中究竟有何玄机？ 究其原因，是A股市场正经历一场前所未有的狂欢。 同一时间，上证指数一路高歌猛进，成功突破3800点，创下近十年来的新高，单日涨幅高达1.09%。中 证转债亦不甘示弱，紧随其后，上涨0.8%。在"逐利"法则下，资金如潮水般涌向股市。 在股市动辄百分之几的日涨幅面前，债市那点微薄的利息显得黯然失色，毫无吸引力。然而，债市向来 以"稳健"著称，为何会遭遇如此程度的连续下跌？ 事实上，从8月初开始，利率债便已进入下行通道，超长期债券基金更是首当其冲，损失惨重。部分基 金单日净值跌幅超过0.5%，投资者们的心态遭受巨大冲击。习惯了每日"收蛋"的债基投资者，如今却面 临"碎蛋"的困境，苦不堪言。 这背后，是经 ...

Core Viewpoint - The market is experiencing fluctuations, with value styles showing relative strength during these times, indicating potential investment opportunities in value-oriented stocks and funds [3][4][10]. Market Overview - The overall market slightly declined, with the CSI All Share Index down by 0.13% [1]. - Large-cap stocks saw slight gains, while small-cap stocks experienced more significant declines [2]. - The pharmaceutical sector showed overall gains, contrasting with the slight decline in consumer stocks that had previously risen [5][6]. Investment Strategies - In the current market environment, it is advised to maintain a steady position and avoid frequent trading to prevent losses [8][11]. - The recent market behavior resembles the trends observed between 2013 and 2017, suggesting that undervalued stocks across various categories will eventually have their performance phases [9][10]. Value Style Performance - Value styles, including dividend and free cash flow stocks, have seen an increase, although the overall rise has been modest this year [4][18][19]. - The A-share CSI Dividend Index showed a slight decline from the beginning of the year until August 21, while the Hong Kong dividend stocks have seen some gains, albeit limited [20][21]. Fund Performance and Strategies - The "Monthly Salary Treasure" strategy is currently undervalued, with 40% of its portfolio in value-oriented stocks [17]. - The bond portion of the "Monthly Salary Treasure" strategy is focused on medium to short-term bonds, which are currently more favorable compared to long-term bonds that have seen significant declines this year [28][30]. - The strategy includes an automatic rebalancing feature to optimize returns by adjusting the stock and bond allocations based on market movements [28][30]. Valuation Insights - A valuation table for dividend indices has been created for reference, highlighting various metrics such as earnings yield, price-to-earnings ratio, and return on equity [22][41]. - The current valuation of value styles has not improved significantly since the beginning of the year, indicating potential for future appreciation as market conditions evolve [27]. Upcoming Events - A live session is scheduled to discuss historical bull and bear market characteristics and current market stages, providing insights for investors [4].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In H1 2025, the scale of pure - bond funds increased by nearly 100 billion yuan. Credit medium - and long - term bond funds showed outstanding performance in a volatile market, but the overall performance of pure - bond funds was inferior to the same period in previous years. Meanwhile, the expansion of pure - bond funds was hindered, and "Fixed Income +" funds became popular in the market [1]. - The scale of index funds increased significantly beyond the seasonal trend. Credit - based index bond funds witnessed explosive growth, while interest - rate based ones had a recovery. For medium - and long - term bond funds, the equilibrium and interest - rate styles grew in scale, while the credit style declined. Short - term and medium - short - term bond funds ended three consecutive quarters of scale reduction [3][4]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 2025 H1, the scale of pure - bond funds increased by nearly 100 billion yuan 3.1.1 Credit medium - and long - term bond funds showed outstanding performance in a volatile market - In Q1 2025, affected by multiple negative factors, the bond market was under pressure, and the yield center of pure - bond funds dropped significantly. In Q2, due to factors such as increased risk - aversion sentiment and abundant liquidity, the bond market strengthened, and the single - quarter yield center of pure - bond funds turned positive [11]. - The median return of pure - bond funds in H1 2025 was 0.76%, recovering the losses in Q1 but underperforming the same period in 2024 and 2023. Credit - style products were more popular, with the return center of medium - and long - term credit bond funds reaching 1.00%, leading other styles [1][14]. 3.1.2 The expansion of pure - bond funds was hindered, and "Fixed Income +" became popular in the market - The total scale of pure - bond funds increased from 9.50 trillion yuan at the end of 2024 to 9.59 trillion yuan in mid - 2025, with an increase of only 93.8 billion yuan. In contrast, the total scale of "Fixed Income +" funds increased by 256.9 billion yuan to 1.48 trillion yuan. The "market share" of pure - bond funds decreased by nearly 2 percentage points [18]. 3.1.3 Most of the top - tier fund managers saw an increase in scale - In H1 2025, 67 fund managers had positive scale growth, with 16 managers having a scale increase of over 10 billion yuan and 28 managers over 5 billion yuan. Among the 21 top - tier managers, 14 had a net scale increase, mainly in Q2 [23]. - Index - type bond funds quickly replaced medium - and long - term bond funds as the focus of fund managers. Among the 15 fund managers with rapid scale growth in Q2, index - type bond funds contributed 250.4 billion yuan, accounting for over 50% [2][28]. 3.2 By type, the scale growth of index funds was significantly beyond the seasonal trend 3.2.1 Index bond funds: credit - based ones had explosive growth, and interest - rate based ones had a recovery - In Q1 2025, due to the seasonal effect, the scale of index - type bond funds decreased by 92.6 billion yuan. In Q2, the scale increased by 308.3 billion yuan, reaching the highest level since 2019 [33]. - Credit - bond index funds grew rapidly, with a net increase of about 220 billion yuan in Q2, and their proportion in index - type bond funds rose from 12% at the end of Q1 to 24%. Policy - financial bond index funds had a recovery, but their proportion decreased from 71% to 60% [35]. 3.2.2 Medium - and long - term bond funds: the equilibrium and interest - rate styles grew in scale, while the credit style declined - The medium - and long - term bond fund market was first depressed and then rebounded in H1 2025. The scale decreased by 394.6 billion yuan in Q1 and rebounded by 275.1 billion yuan in Q2 but did not fully recover the losses in Q1 [48]. - There was a significant style rotation in H1 2025. In Q1, funds flowed into credit - style products, while in Q2, the equilibrium and interest - rate styles grew, and the credit style shrank. The main reason was the active adjustment of the holding structure of existing funds [48][49]. 3.2.3 Short - term and medium - short - term bond funds: ended three consecutive quarters of scale reduction - In Q2 2025, the scale of short - term and medium - short - term bond funds rebounded, ending the downward trend since Q3 2024. The scale of short - term bond funds increased by 17.1% to 545.5 billion yuan, and that of medium - short - term bond funds increased by 18.5% to 600.5 billion yuan [59]. 3.3 Appendix: Fund classification method - For the selection of the fund list each quarter, start from the initial funds of bond - type funds in the Wind first - level classification and partial - debt hybrid funds in the second - level classification. Eliminate funds that do not meet the requirements to ensure that they are pure - bond funds [67]. - Classify short - term and medium - short - term bond funds based on the full - name matching of fund products, investment scope, performance comparison benchmark, and weighted duration of heavy - position bonds. Classify medium - and long - term bond funds according to the bond - holding situation in the quarterly report and assign style labels [68].

Group 1: Wealth Management Scale - The wealth management scale decreased by CNY 744 billion to CNY 30.92 trillion during the week of July 28 to August 1[1] - In July, the total growth was only CNY 2,469 billion, significantly lower than the historical average of over CNY 10 trillion for the same month[1] - The decline in scale is attributed to ongoing net value decreases and redemption pressures, with short-term and medium-term debt products experiencing maximum drawdowns of 8bp and 6bp respectively[1] Group 2: Leverage Rates - The average leverage level in the interbank market decreased from 107.41% to 107.34% during the week of July 28 to August 1[3] - Non-bank institutions saw a rebound in leverage rates, increasing from 112.10% to 112.34%[3] - Exchange leverage rates also declined slightly from 122.47% to 122.43% during the same period[3] Group 3: Bond Fund Duration - The duration of interest rate-based medium and long-term bond funds decreased from 5.49 years to 5.45 years[4] - Credit bond fund duration reached a historical high of 2.81 years, up from 2.78 years[4] - Short and medium-term bond fund durations decreased to 1.01 years and 1.65 years respectively[4] Group 4: Government Debt Issuance - The planned issuance of government bonds increased to CNY 5,785 billion for the week of August 4-8, up from CNY 5,174 billion[47] - Net issuance of government bonds rose from CNY 2,876 billion to CNY 3,390 billion, primarily due to a significant increase in national bond net issuance[47] - Local government bond issuance for the week of July 28 to August 1 was CNY 3,372 billion, with a net issuance of CNY 2,360 billion[50]

Core Viewpoint - The performance and scale of interbank certificate of deposit (CD) index funds are under pressure due to a low interest rate environment, with an average net value growth rate of only 0.63% this year, which is lower than that of short-term bond funds and floating net value money market funds [1][3][4]. Group 1: Performance and Scale Challenges - The average net value growth rate of interbank CD index funds is 0.63%, which is below the 0.91% and 0.71% of short-term bond funds and floating net value money market funds, respectively [3][4]. - As of the end of Q1, the total scale of interbank CD index funds was 1089.52 billion, a decrease of nearly 490 billion, or 31%, from the end of last year [3][4]. - Nearly 90% of the products experienced a scale shrinkage in Q1, with over 40 funds having a scale of less than 200 million, accounting for over 40% of the total [3][4]. Group 2: Factors Affecting Performance - The performance of interbank CD index funds is closely tied to short-term funding market rates, with low interest rates leading to reduced coupon income and limited investment scope [4][6]. - The liquidity constraints of a 7-day holding period further diminish the attractiveness of these funds [4][6]. - In contrast, money market funds and short-term bond funds have maintained better performance due to their active management advantages and flexible asset allocation strategies [5][6]. Group 3: Future Outlook and Strategies - Despite the scale shrinkage, there is potential for increased attractiveness of interbank CD index funds as cash management tools in a low interest rate environment [8][12]. - The future performance of these funds will depend on the central bank's liquidity stance and the dynamics of market supply and demand [9][10]. - Fund managers are expected to enhance product competitiveness through strategies such as optimizing portfolio structures and designing differentiated holding periods and fee structures [13][14].

Group 1: Wealth Management Trends - The wealth management scale decreased by CNY 286.4 billion to CNY 31.33 trillion during the week of June 23-27, 2025, marking a significant decline compared to previous years[1] - Historical data shows that the decline in the second quarter has consistently exceeded CNY 1.1 trillion in recent years, indicating a seasonal pattern[2] - In July, the wealth management scale typically experiences seasonal expansion, with historical increases ranging from CNY 1.4 trillion to CNY 2.2 trillion, while June declines are generally between CNY 0.8 trillion and CNY 1.5 trillion[3] Group 2: Market Dynamics - The average daily purchase of liquidity management assets, such as certificates of deposit, was CNY 12.9 billion from June 16-27, significantly higher than the average of CNY 1.4 billion during the same period in 2022-2024[4] - The average leverage ratio in the interbank market rose from 108.00% to 108.11% during the week of June 23-27, indicating increasing leverage despite a controlled liability pressure on banks[5] - The weighted issuance rate of certificates of deposit decreased to 1.64%, reflecting manageable pressure on banks' balance sheets[6] Group 3: Fund Duration and Risk Indicators - The duration of medium- and long-term bond funds decreased, with the duration of interest rate-based funds dropping from 5.29 years to 5.11 years, while credit-based funds saw a slight decrease from 2.44 years to 2.41 years[7] - The overall negative yield rate for wealth management products decreased to 1.46%, down 2.55 percentage points from the previous week, indicating improved performance[8] - The proportion of underperforming wealth management products fell to 16.3%, a decrease of 0.3 percentage points from the previous week, suggesting a stabilization in product performance[9]

Core Viewpoint - The bond market is expected to maintain a narrow fluctuation pattern in the short term, with potential for a trend upward over the year [1][5]. Group 1: Investment Strategy - The investment framework focuses on credit bonds as the base and enhances returns through interest rate bond trading, aligning with the evolving market ecology post-asset management regulations [2]. - The strategy of "buying on dips and selling on rises" is recommended for short-term operations, while maintaining a long-term perspective on credit bond investments [5]. - The introduction of government bond futures for risk hedging in new fund contracts reflects a systematic optimization of investment strategies in response to market changes [4]. Group 2: Risk Management - A rigorous risk management strategy is employed, emphasizing extreme diversification in credit bond investments to mitigate potential credit risks [3]. - The use of long-duration interest rate bonds allows for effective duration management, with a focus on quick trading to capitalize on market fluctuations [3]. - Traditional risk avoidance measures have been strengthened, including lowering product duration and incorporating credit risk mitigation clauses [4]. Group 3: Market Environment - The short bond market faced pressure in the first quarter, with a reported annualized yield of -2.89% for the two-year government bond futures [5]. - Despite recent monetary easing measures, the market's expectations for further rate cuts remain cautious, potentially creating short-term opportunities if cuts are realized [5]. - The bond market's inherent bullish nature allows for the accumulation of coupon income during holding periods, suggesting a strategy of maintaining positions while waiting for favorable conditions [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of balancing offensive and defensive assets in investment portfolios, particularly during uncertain market conditions. Defensive assets serve as a protective measure, helping to preserve capital and provide stability amidst market volatility [2][27]. Group 1: Understanding Defensive Assets - Defensive assets are categorized into risk assets, which are subject to significant price fluctuations, and safe-haven assets, which maintain their intrinsic value during market turmoil [4]. - The two primary functions of defensive assets are to reduce portfolio volatility and to provide high credit quality and liquidity, ensuring stable cash flow during market downturns [4]. Group 2: Types of Defensive Assets - **Cash and Cash Equivalents**: Highly liquid and safe, including money market funds that can be accessed at any time without fees [6][9]. - **Bond Assets**: Offer fixed income and typically have an inverse relationship with risk assets, with government bonds providing stronger defensive characteristics [10][11]. - **Dividend Assets**: Provide regular cash flow through dividends, performing well in bear markets and benefiting from valuation recovery in bull markets [12][13]. - **Gold**: Recognized as a safe-haven asset during crises, it retains value and is less affected by inflation compared to fiat currencies [14][15]. - **Commodities**: Serve as a hedge against inflation and supply disruptions, with stable demand across various sectors [16][17]. Group 3: Performance of Defensive Assets in Different Scenarios - **Economic Deflation**: Bond assets perform best due to liquidity and declining interest rates, while commodities lag [21][22]. - **Stagflation**: Commodities excel as inflation rises, while bonds struggle due to tightening monetary policy [23][24]. - **Geopolitical Conflicts**: Gold prices tend to rise significantly during prolonged conflicts, outperforming other asset classes [25][26]. Group 4: Conclusion - In the current complex investment landscape, incorporating defensive assets into portfolios is essential. A diversified approach across different types of defensive assets can enhance overall portfolio resilience [27].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of balancing offensive and defensive assets in investment portfolios, particularly during uncertain market conditions. Defensive assets serve as a "stabilizing force" to protect investors' wealth amidst market volatility [2][32]. Group 1: Understanding Defensive Assets - Defensive assets are categorized as those that maintain stable intrinsic value and exhibit lower price volatility during market fluctuations, contrasting with risk assets that are more sensitive to market changes [4]. - The two primary functions of defensive assets are to reduce portfolio volatility and provide high credit quality and liquidity, ensuring stable cash flow during market downturns [4]. Group 2: Types of Defensive Assets - **Cash and Cash Equivalents**: High safety and liquidity, including money market funds that can be accessed anytime without fees [6][8]. - **Bond Assets**: Fixed income with potential for interest and price appreciation, with government bonds offering more stability than corporate bonds [10][11]. - **Dividend Assets**: Provide regular cash flow through dividends, performing well in bear markets and benefiting from valuation recovery in bull markets [14][15]. - **Gold**: Recognized as a "safe haven" asset during crises, maintaining value better than fiat currencies [16][18]. - **Commodities**: Stable demand and serve as a hedge against inflation, with specific commodities like oil and metals being particularly relevant during supply disruptions [20][21]. Group 3: Performance of Defensive Assets in Different Scenarios - **Economic Deflation**: Bond assets perform best due to liquidity and declining interest rates, while commodities lag [24][26]. - **Stagflation**: Commodities excel as inflation rises, while bonds struggle due to tightening monetary policy [28]. - **Geopolitical Conflicts**: Gold prices tend to rise significantly during conflicts, reflecting its status as a hard currency [30][31]. Group 4: Conclusion - In the current complex investment landscape, incorporating defensive assets into portfolios is essential. Diversifying across different types of defensive assets can enhance overall portfolio resilience [32].

Core Viewpoint - The recent easing of US-China tariff negotiations has led to increased volatility in the bond market, particularly in long-term interest rates [1][2]. Bond Market Outlook - Following two consecutive years of declining bond markets in 2023 and 2024, current bond yields are relatively low, and the bond market is unlikely to replicate the previous two years' downward trend in 2025. Investors should lower their expected returns from bond funds [4]. - In the context of narrow yield spreads, the value of medium- to short-term bond investments is highlighted, with a recommendation to focus on high-quality short-term and medium-term bond funds [4][5]. Performance of Medium- to Short-Term Bonds - The bond market has shown significant differentiation, with bonds maturing in five years or less performing well, while long-term bonds exhibit volatility. This is attributed to the central bank's unexpected rate cuts, which have lowered the funding rate to around 1.5% [6]. - The performance of medium- to short-term products is expected to remain strong, with a focus on short-term bonds that offer a clear carry opportunity [7]. Investment Recommendations - Investors are advised to prioritize medium- to short-term credit bonds as a core strategy, while also considering opportunities in long-term bonds during market adjustments [7]. - Specific recommendations include focusing on short-term bonds with positive carry, such as 3-5 year municipal bonds, while waiting for favorable conditions to increase holdings in long-term bonds [7]. Fund Characteristics - The "Huitianfu Fengsui 60-Day Holding Period Bond Fund" is highlighted for its advantages, including being a pure bond fund with low drawdown risk, focusing on high-rated credit bonds, and maintaining a low fee structure [8][9][10]. - The fund manager, Li Wei, has extensive experience in managing bond portfolios and employs strategies to optimize returns while controlling risks [14][15]. Manager's Strategy - Li Wei emphasizes a combination of credit and interest rate strategies, utilizing futures for hedging and adjusting the portfolio based on macroeconomic analysis and market psychology [16][17]. - The fund's approach includes leveraging the yield spread and optimizing the bond selection process to enhance the portfolio's performance [17].