Report Investment Rating - The operation rating of CITIC Five-Style - Stable is ★☆☆ [4] Core Viewpoints - In the week ending March 27, 2026, the weekly returns of Tonglian All A (Shanghai, Shenzhen, Beijing), ChinaBond Composite Bond, and Nanhua Commodity Index were -0.76%, 0.06%, and -0.25% respectively. The convertible bond strategy in the public fund market performed well with a weekly return rate of 0.60%, while the equity long strategy index continued to decline, and most neutral strategy products rose. The pure - bond strategy index closed up, and the medium - to - long - term return was stronger than that of short - term pure bonds. Among commodities, the energy and chemical ETF rose 3.35%, the precious metal ETF net value continued to decline, and the non - ferrous metal ETF's return rebounded slightly [3] - Among the CITIC Five - Style indices, the stable and cyclical styles closed up, while the other styles closed down. The style rotation chart shows that the relative strength of the cyclical style has increased significantly recently, and the relative strength momentum of the consumption style has declined marginally. In the public fund pool, the growth and financial style fund indices outperformed the benchmark, with weekly excess return rates of 0.89% and 0.64% respectively. The market's bias towards the growth and financial styles has increased. This week, the market congestion index rebounded, and the current financial style congestion is in the medium - to - high percentile range of the past year [3] - Among the Barra factors, the short - term momentum factor performed strongly in the past week, the return of the profitability factor adjusted, the winning rate of the liquidity factor continued to decline, and the valuation and scale factors rebounded marginally. This week, the cross - section rotation speed of factors increased month - on - month and is currently in the medium percentile range of the past year [3] - According to the latest scoring results of the style timing model, the financial style rebounded marginally this week, and the current signal continues to be the stable style. The return rate of the style timing strategy last week was 0.56%, and the excess return rate compared with the benchmark balanced allocation was 1.13% [3] Summary by Directory Fund Market Review - **Market Index Returns**: The weekly returns of Tonglian All A (Shanghai, Shenzhen, Beijing), ChinaBond Composite Bond, and Nanhua Commodity Index were -0.76%, 0.06%, and -0.25% respectively [3] - **Public Fund Strategy Performance**: The convertible bond strategy had a weekly return of 0.60%. The equity long strategy index continued to decline, most neutral strategy products rose. The pure - bond strategy index closed up, with medium - to - long - term returns stronger than short - term pure bonds. The energy and chemical ETF rose 3.35%, the precious metal ETF net value continued to decline, and the non - ferrous metal ETF's return rebounded slightly [3] CITIC Five - Style Analysis - **Style Index Performance**: The stable and cyclical styles closed up, while the other styles closed down. The relative strength of the cyclical style increased significantly, and the relative strength momentum of the consumption style declined marginally [3] - **Fund Pool Performance**: The growth and financial style fund indices outperformed the benchmark, with weekly excess return rates of 0.89% and 0.64% respectively. The market's preference for growth and financial styles increased [3] - **Style Congestion**: The market congestion index rebounded, and the current financial style congestion is in the medium - to - high percentile range of the past year [3] Barra Factor Analysis - **Factor Performance**: The short - term momentum factor performed strongly, the return of the profitability factor adjusted, the winning rate of the liquidity factor continued to decline, and the valuation and scale factors rebounded marginally [3] - **Factor Rotation Speed**: The cross - section rotation speed of factors increased month - on - month and is currently in the medium percentile range of the past year [3] Style Timing Model - The financial style rebounded marginally this week, and the current signal continues to be the stable style. The return rate of the style timing strategy last week was 0.56%, and the excess return rate compared with the benchmark balanced allocation was 1.13% [3]

Market Pricing Status - The market trading activity has slightly decreased, with the profitability effect diminishing. The average daily trading volume for the entire A-share market has dropped to 22.11 trillion yuan, and the proportion of stocks rising has decreased to 10.6% [8][9] - The trading concentration in primary industries has decreased, while it has increased in secondary industries. The turnover rate for the petroleum and petrochemical industry is above 99% [8][16] A-Share Liquidity Tracking - Financing funds, foreign capital, and ETF funds have all seen slight outflows. The new issuance scale of equity funds has decreased to 24.54 billion yuan [8][27] - Foreign capital has flowed out of the A-share market by 5.32 million USD, with the northbound capital transaction proportion rising to 39.5% [8][44] A-Share Industry Allocation Tracking - Financing funds and ETF funds have both flowed out of the non-ferrous metals sector. The electronic and power equipment sectors have seen significant outflows of foreign capital [8][19] - The banking and non-bank financial sectors have experienced net inflows, while non-ferrous metals and basic chemicals have seen net outflows in ETF funds [8][19] Hong Kong and Global Liquidity Tracking - There has been a significant outflow of southbound funds, with global foreign capital marginally flowing into the US and Japanese markets. The Nasdaq index has decreased by 2.1% [8][22] - The net outflow of southbound funds has risen to 6.329 billion yuan, marking a significant level since 2022 [8][22]

- The report discusses the use of a fund position estimation model to analyze the allocation of public equity funds in the non-ferrous metals sector. The model revealed that as of January 30, the allocation ratio reached a recent high of 10.5%, significantly exceeding the sector's market capitalization ratio of 5.7% in the overall A-share market. This indicates a substantial over-allocation by institutions[2][13] - The model also analyzed the holdings of the largest non-ferrous metals ETF (512400.SH), which has a scale of 28.6 billion yuan. It found that nearly 80% of its holders are institutions, and the ETF experienced a net outflow of 4.5 billion yuan from March 12 to March 20, suggesting concentrated institutional selling[3][14] - The BARRA style factor analysis in the report highlights the performance of various factors. For example, the "volatility" factor showed a positive return of 0.7% this week, while the "momentum" factor maintained a negative return of -0.6%. Additionally, the "dividend yield" and "market capitalization" factors both exhibited positive returns of 0.5%[23][25]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of including commodities, particularly gold, in investment portfolios to mitigate risks during geopolitical shocks, as evidenced by historical data showing commodities consistently perform well during such events [4][20][36]. Group 1: Geopolitical Events and Market Reactions - A study by J.P. Morgan analyzed 36 major geopolitical events from 1940 to 2022, revealing that stock market performance typically rebounds after initial declines following such shocks [8][12]. - The only significant exception was the 1973 oil embargo, which led to a 37% drop in the S&P 500 over 12 months due to the U.S.'s heavy reliance on imported oil [16][19]. - In contrast, the oil price shock from the 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict saw prices spike but return to lower levels relatively quickly, highlighting the U.S.'s improved energy independence due to the shale revolution [19][20]. Group 2: Asset Performance During Geopolitical Shocks - During geopolitical shocks, commodities like gold and oil tend to show positive returns, while stocks and bonds often decline [24][25]. - Historical data indicates that gold averages a 1.8% increase during such events, while stocks and bonds average a -1.6% decline [24][25]. - The article notes that central banks have significantly increased gold purchases as a hedge against geopolitical risks, with U.S. central bank purchases quadrupling post-2022 conflict [27]. Group 3: Portfolio Composition and Strategy - The article advocates for a three-legged investment strategy: stocks for growth, bonds for interest, and commodities for stability during crises [29][30]. - It suggests that many investors currently lack adequate commodity exposure, particularly gold, which is essential for a balanced portfolio [30][36]. - The timing of commodity purchases is crucial; the article advises against buying during high volatility and suggests establishing commodity positions during stable periods [32][33].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant shift in the A-share ETF market, driven by geopolitical conflicts, leading to a substantial inflow of funds into resource-related ETFs, particularly in oil and gas sectors, while core broad-based ETFs experienced notable outflows [3][4][11]. Fund Flows and Market Dynamics - As of March 6, nearly 400 billion yuan was withdrawn from core broad-based ETFs like the CSI 300 and CSI 500, while industry-themed ETFs saw a net inflow of 443.23 billion yuan, indicating a clear trend of funds moving from broad-based to thematic investments [4]. - Oil and gas ETFs emerged as the top performers, attracting over 206 billion yuan in a single week, with several products seeing their shares increase by over 300% [4][5]. - Specific oil and gas ETFs, such as the Guotai CSI Oil and Gas Industry ETF and the Penghua Oil ETF, attracted more than 40 billion yuan each within a few trading days, leading to significant increases in their share volumes [4][5]. Performance of Thematic ETFs - Other sectors, including electric grid, rare metals, and non-ferrous metals, also received substantial investment, with the Huaxia Electric Grid Equipment ETF seeing over 10 billion yuan in net inflows for six consecutive trading days [5]. - The trading activity for these thematic ETFs surged, with the Guotai CSI Oil and Gas Industry ETF recording a weekly trading volume exceeding 225 billion yuan, a 13-fold increase from the previous week [5]. Discrepancies in Fund Performance - There is a notable lag in the performance of some fund connection products compared to their corresponding ETFs, leading to investor confusion regarding the slower net value growth of these connection funds [7][8]. - The differences arise because ETF connection funds are designed to track the net value of the ETFs rather than their trading prices, which can lead to discrepancies during periods of high market volatility [8][9]. Future Market Outlook - The article highlights that geopolitical uncertainties are likely to continue affecting market risk preferences, with expectations of a volatile A-share index [11]. - Strategic resource products are anticipated to benefit from price increases, particularly in the oil and gas sector, which may see prices reach historical highs due to ongoing geopolitical tensions [12][13]. - The demand for rare metals is expected to grow due to their critical role in various industries, while traditional cyclical industries like coal and steel may also present investment opportunities [13].

Core Viewpoint - The ETF market is experiencing a significant shift due to the withdrawal of state-owned funds, leading to a structural adjustment in growth dynamics and product rankings within the industry [3][5][32]. Group 1: Market Overview - The ETF market saw rapid growth, with total scale reaching 6.02 trillion yuan by the end of 2025, a year-on-year increase of 61.4% [2]. - However, by February 25, 2026, the total market scale dropped to 5.43 trillion yuan, a decrease of 600 billion yuan, or 10% [3][9]. - The recent decline in ETF scale is attributed to the exit of "helping funds" and state-owned capital, which had previously supported the market [4][11]. Group 2: Product Structure Changes - The withdrawal of state funds has led to a re-ranking of ETF products, with the CSI 300 ETF experiencing the largest decline, losing nearly 590 billion yuan since the beginning of the year [11]. - The CSI A500 ETF has gained momentum, with its scale decreasing by only 376 billion yuan, significantly narrowing the gap with the CSI 300 ETF [12][13]. - As of February 25, 2026, the CSI 300 ETF's scale is 596.9 billion yuan, while the CSI A500 ETF stands at 263.2 billion yuan, reducing the difference to approximately 330 billion yuan [11]. Group 3: Fund Management Companies - Major fund management companies like Huaxia and E Fund continue to lead the market, but their scales have decreased significantly due to the withdrawal of state funds [21][22]. - As of February 25, 2026, Huaxia Fund's scale is 7439.32 billion yuan, while E Fund's is 6949.94 billion yuan, both showing substantial reductions from previous levels [23]. - Companies focusing on industry ETFs, such as Guotai Fund, are benefiting from the current market dynamics, with a potential to surpass others in the future [25]. Group 4: Future Growth Drivers - The growth of the ETF market is expected to shift from state-driven investments to demand from institutional and retail investors, with a focus on thematic and industry-specific ETFs [31][33]. - The anticipated influx of funds from household savings, insurance, and pension funds is expected to provide a stable source of capital for ETFs, potentially covering the 600 billion yuan gap left by state fund withdrawals [34][35]. - The trend towards thematic ETFs, particularly in sectors like AI, semiconductors, and renewable energy, is likely to drive future growth, as these areas attract significant investor interest [33][36].

Core Viewpoint - The trading activity of various ETFs, particularly in the technology and materials sectors, remains robust, with significant transaction volumes reported for both domestic and cross-border ETFs. Group 1: Domestic ETFs - The active trading of domestic ETFs includes the following: - Sci-Tech Chip ETF (588200) with a trading volume of 1.847 billion yuan and a price decrease of 1.25% [2] - Nonferrous Metals ETF (512400) showing a trading volume of 1.355 billion yuan and a price increase of 1.5% [2] - Power Grid Equipment ETF (159326) with a trading volume of 1.280 billion yuan and a price decrease of 1.67% [2] - Other notable ETFs include Semiconductor Equipment ETF (159516) with a trading volume of 1.006 billion yuan and a price decrease of 2.77% [2], and Sci-Tech Semiconductor ETF (588170) with a trading volume of 0.951 billion yuan and a price decrease of 2.73% [2]. Group 2: Cross-Border ETFs - The cross-border ETF market shows significant activity, particularly: - Hang Seng Technology ETF (513130) with a trading volume of 3.451 billion yuan and no price change [4] - Hang Seng Technology Index ETF (513180) with a trading volume of 2.749 billion yuan and a price increase of 0.15% [4] - Hong Kong Securities ETF (513090) with a trading volume of 2.158 billion yuan and a price decrease of 1.06% [4]. Group 3: Rare Earth ETFs - Rare Earth ETFs are experiencing notable performance: - Rare Earth ETF (159713) increased by 2.7% with a trading volume of 0.173 billion yuan [6] - The ETF tracks the China Securities Rare Earth Industry Index, which reflects a high concentration of companies involved in rare earth mining, processing, and trading [7]. - The index's major constituents include: - Northern Rare Earth (600111) with a weight of 14.90% [8] - Goldwind Technology (002202) with a weight of 7.08% [8] - Xiamen Tungsten (600549) with a weight of 6.81% [8].

Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index rose by 0.39%, while the ChiNext Index fell by 1.04% [1] - The total trading volume in the Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing markets was 25,055 billion yuan, a decrease of 512 billion yuan compared to the previous day [1] - Over 3,200 stocks across the three markets experienced gains [1] Sector Performance - Rare metal stocks saw a surge, with significant increases in magnesium and tungsten stocks [1] - The rare metal ETFs, including the Rare Metal ETF and Rare Earth ETF, reported gains of 4.68% and 4.11% respectively [1] - The power sector showed strength, with the Power ETF and Green Power ETF rising by 2.73% and 2.53% respectively [1] - The steel sector also performed well, with the Steel ETF increasing by 2.45% [1] Declining Sectors - The ChiNext Growth ETF and the Deep Growth ETF both fell by 2% [1] - The semiconductor sector experienced declines, with the Semiconductor Equipment ETF and the Sci-Tech Semiconductor ETF dropping by 2.16% and 2.15% respectively [1]

Group 1 - The total number of newly established funds in 2023 has reached 228, with a total issuance of over 210 billion units, marking a significant year-on-year increase [1] - The first batch of commercial real estate REITs has been accepted for review, with regulatory feedback focusing on asset quality, compliance, revenue stability, and governance mechanisms [2] - Huang Feng has been appointed as the new Chief Information Officer of Guolian An Fund as of February 25 [3] Group 2 - A fund managed by Li Xiaoxing has appointed a new fund manager, Sun Haotian, who has 7.5 years of experience in the securities industry [4] - The ETF market showed mixed performance, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 0.39% and the ChiNext Index falling by 1.04%, while sectors like rare metals and coal saw significant gains [5] - Rare earths are highlighted as a strategic resource with a notable supply-demand mismatch, driven by increased demand for neodymium-iron-boron, leading to rising prices for neodymium oxide [8] Group 3 - The Tianhong Zhongzheng Quality Leading 50 Index fund is set to launch, managed by Sha Chuan, with a performance benchmark linked to the index and a portion to bank deposits [9] - The Huashan Innovation Momentum Mixed Fund, managed by Sang Xiangyu, has a performance benchmark that combines multiple indices [10]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights a significant influx of funds into Hong Kong stock-themed ETFs, particularly the Hang Seng Technology ETF, indicating a new trend in asset allocation for 2026 [1][2][3] - As of February 24, 2023, the Hang Seng Technology ETF saw a net inflow of 342.50 billion yuan year-to-date, while the overall market for broad-based ETFs experienced net redemptions exceeding 1000 billion yuan [2][3] - The Hang Seng Technology Index has dropped over 21% since its peak in October 2022, yet this decline has not deterred investors, who are adopting a "buy the dip" strategy [2][3] Group 2 - The article notes that the Hang Seng Technology ETF has accumulated a total net subscription of 1047.30 billion yuan over the past six months, indicating strong investor interest despite market volatility [1][3] - Analysts suggest that the current low valuation of Hong Kong stocks, combined with a shift in global monetary policy, has made these ETFs an attractive option for investors seeking to capitalize on potential rebounds [2][4] - The Hang Seng Technology Index's current price-to-earnings ratio is approximately 22 times, which is considered low compared to historical averages, suggesting a favorable valuation compared to global tech indices [5][6] Group 3 - Investment strategies are being discussed, with recommendations for a balanced approach to ETF investments, including both A-shares and Hong Kong stocks, as well as sector-specific ETFs [6] - The potential for growth in the Hong Kong technology sector is linked to advancements in AI, although there are concerns about the sustainability of valuations in the face of changing market conditions [4][6] - Investors are advised to consider dollar-cost averaging as a strategy, while closely monitoring the Federal Reserve's monetary policy, which could impact the valuation recovery of Hong Kong stocks [6]