从深股通前十大成交个股来看，东方财富位居首位；宁德时代和中际旭创分居二、三位。 二、板块个股主力大单资金 从板块表现来看，稀土永磁、白酒、CPO、通信设备等板块涨幅居前，美容护理等少数板块下跌。 | 排名 | 板块名称 | 主力资金净流入(亿元) | 主力资金净流入率 (%) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 有色金属 | 39.22 | 2.16 | | 2 | 食品饮料行业 | 28.39 | 4.31 | | 3 | 钢铁 | 18.52 | 8.48 | | 4 | 房地产 | 15.54 | 3.42 | | 5 | 工业金属 | 10.40 | 1.91 | 沪深股通今日合计成交4045.44亿，其中药明康德和东方财富分居沪股通和深股通个股成交额首位。板块主力 资金方面，有色金属板块主力资金净流入居首。ETF成交方面，能源化工ETF(159981)成交额环比增长 225%。期指持仓方面，IC合约多头加仓数量大于空头。龙虎榜方面，金力永磁获机构买入1.42亿，获三家一 线游资席位合计买入超3.2亿；恒宝股份获机构买入1.2亿，遭两家量化席位做T；川润股份遭机构卖出1 ...

一、沪深股通前十大成交 沪深股通今日合计成交4045.44亿，其中药明康德和东方财富分居沪股通和深股通个股成交额首位。板块主力资金方 面，有色金属板块主力资金净流入居首。ETF成交方面，能源化工ETF(159981)成交额环比增长225%。期指持仓方面， IC合约多头加仓数量大于空头。龙虎榜方面，金力永磁获机构买入1.42亿，获三家一线游资席位合计买入超3.2亿；恒 宝股份获机构买入1.2亿，遭两家量化席位做T；川润股份遭机构卖出1.23亿；金风科技遭机构卖出3.78亿；南方精工遭 机构卖出1.17亿；东方精工获国泰海通上海新闸路营业部净买入1.88亿。 今日沪股通总成交金额为1906.07亿，深股通总成交金额为2139.37亿。 | | | | 沪股通( 8月25日 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 排名 | 股票代码 | 股票名称 | 成父金額 | ष्ठ | -交易日争买入额 | 涨幅(%) | | | | | (亿元) | | (亿元) | | | 1 | 603259 | 药明康德 | 37.46 | | | | | 2 | ...

Report Investment Rating - The operation rating for the CITIC five-style - Cycle is ★☆☆ [4] Core Viewpoints - As of the week ending August 8, 2025, the weekly returns of Tonglian All A (Shanghai, Shenzhen, Beijing), ChinaBond Composite Bond, and Nanhua Commodity Index were 1.94%, 0.03%, and -0.36% respectively. In the public fund market, index enhancement strategies led in returns with a weekly increase of 1.65%. In the equity product segment, market neutral strategies generally had more gains than losses. For bonds, convertible bond returns rebounded, but the growth of short - and medium - to long - term pure bond funds slowed compared to the previous week. Among commodity funds, energy and chemical ETFs remained weak, while precious metals saw a rebound in returns, with the net value of silver ETFs rising significantly by 3.84% [4] - In the CITIC five - style, the style index closed up last Friday, with the cycle style leading in returns, rising 3.49%. The style rotation chart showed a slight recovery in the relative strength of the financial and cycle styles, and all five styles strengthened in terms of indicator momentum. Among the public fund pools, the excess returns of consumer - style funds recovered in the past week, with a weekly excess return of 1.06%, while the average return of cycle - style funds did not outperform the benchmark. From the trend of fund style coefficients, some consumer - style funds shifted towards the growth style. Currently, the market congestion is in the historically high - congestion range [4] - In terms of Barra factors, the ALPHA factor had a better return performance in the past week, with a weekly excess return of 0.34%. The returns of the valuation and residual volatility factors weakened. In terms of win - rate, the reversal - type factors strengthened marginally, while the profitability and liquidity factors declined slightly. This week, the cross - sectional rotation speed of factors increased compared to the previous week and is currently in the historically low - quantile range [4] - According to the latest scoring results of the style timing model, the cycle and financial styles recovered this week, while the consumer style declined. The current signal favors the cycle style. The return of the style timing strategy last week was 0.77%, with an excess return of - 1.02% compared to the benchmark balanced allocation [4] Summary by Relevant Catalogs Fund Market Review - In the public fund market, index enhancement strategies led in returns with a weekly increase of 1.65%. Market neutral strategies in equity products generally had more gains than losses. Convertible bond returns rebounded, but the growth of short - and medium - to long - term pure bond funds slowed compared to the previous week. Energy and chemical ETFs remained weak, while precious metals saw a rebound in returns, with the net value of silver ETFs rising significantly by 3.84% [4] Equity Market Style - The CITIC five - style index closed up last Friday, with the cycle style leading in returns, rising 3.49%. The relative strength of the financial and cycle styles slightly recovered, and all five styles strengthened in terms of indicator momentum. The excess returns of consumer - style funds recovered in the past week, with a weekly excess return of 1.06%, while the average return of cycle - style funds did not outperform the benchmark. Some consumer - style funds shifted towards the growth style, and the market congestion is in the historically high - congestion range [4] Barra Factors - The ALPHA factor had a better return performance in the past week, with a weekly excess return of 0.34%. The returns of the valuation and residual volatility factors weakened. The reversal - type factors strengthened marginally, while the profitability and liquidity factors declined slightly. The cross - sectional rotation speed of factors increased compared to the previous week and is currently in the historically low - quantile range [4] Style Timing Model - The cycle and financial styles recovered this week, while the consumer style declined. The current signal favors the cycle style. The return of the style timing strategy last week was 0.77%, with an excess return of - 1.02% compared to the benchmark balanced allocation [4]

Market Overview - On July 28, 2025, A-shares saw collective gains across the three major indices, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 0.12%, the Shenzhen Component Index by 0.44%, and the ChiNext Index by 0.96%. The total trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets exceeded 1.7 trillion yuan [1]. Innovation Drug Sector - Innovation drug-related ETFs led the market with significant gains, including the Innovation Drug ETF Hong Kong-Shenzhen (159622) rising by 4.10%, and the Hong Kong Innovation Drug 50 ETF (513780) increasing by 4.04% [1]. - A notable announcement from Heng Rui Medicine involved a potential license-out collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) worth up to $12.5 billion, covering a clinical-stage respiratory innovation drug and up to 11 non-clinical candidates. This news led to a surge in Heng Rui's stock, reaching a four-year high in A-shares and over 16% increase in H-shares [2]. ETF Performance - The top-performing ETFs included several innovation drug-related funds, with multiple ETFs achieving gains above 3.70% [1]. - Conversely, the energy sector faced declines, with the top ETF, the Sci-Tech Comprehensive Aluminum ETF (589300), dropping by 14.01% [3]. Trading Activity - The trading volume for the Short-term Bond ETF (211360) was the highest at 33.9 billion yuan, followed by the Silver Hua Daily ETF (511880) at 21.0 billion yuan [4]. - The turnover rate for the Benchmark National Bond ETF (511100) was the highest at 552.67%, indicating strong trading activity in this segment [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The ETF market showed mixed performance at midday, with certain ETFs experiencing significant gains while others faced notable declines [1] Group 1: ETF Performance - The Hong Kong Stock Connect Non-Bank ETF (513750) led the gains with an increase of 2.57% [1] - The Innovative Drug ETF Tianhong (517380) rose by 2.11% [1] - The Pharmaceutical ETF (562050) saw an increase of 2.10% [1] - Conversely, the Sci-Tech Innovation Index ETF Jiashi (589300) experienced a significant drop of 14.61% [1] - The Energy and Chemical ETF (159981) declined by 3.98% [1] - The Coal ETF (515220) fell by 2.96% [1]

Group 1 - The ETF market opened with mixed performance, with the Huabao Sci-Tech AI ETF (589520) leading the gains at 1.92% [1] - The Sci-Tech Board AI ETF (588930) increased by 1.72%, while the Guotai Sci-Tech Chip ETF (589100) rose by 1.54% [1] - The Energy and Chemical ETF (159981) experienced the largest decline at 3.63%, followed by the Coal ETF (515220) down 2.24%, and the Commodity ETF (510170) falling by 1.57% [1]

Group 1 - The Hong Kong medical ETF (159366) led the gains with an increase of 2.08% [1] - The energy and chemical ETF (159981) rose by 1.64% [1] - The Hong Kong innovative drug ETF (520880) increased by 1.47% [1] Group 2 - The construction materials ETF (159787) was the biggest loser, declining by 2.49% [1] - The infrastructure ETF (516950) fell by 2.46% [1] - The Hang Seng Internet Technology ETF (159202) decreased by 2.15% [1]

Group 1 - The report indicates that in the last month, equities, commodities, and bonds all experienced increases, with equities and commodities rising by 2.50% and 4.03% respectively, while gold decreased by 0.57% [2][10] - The performance of ETFs used in the allocation strategy showed that the CSI 300 ETF, non-ferrous ETF, and energy chemical ETF increased by 2.85%, 3.08%, and 4.37% respectively, while the gold ETF saw a significant decline of 0.75% [2][13] Group 2 - The backtested strategy from January 1, 2014, to the end of last month achieved an annualized return of 7.71%, with an annualized volatility of 3.53% and a maximum drawdown of 3.17%. The Sharpe ratio and Calmar ratio were 2.19 and 2.44 respectively, outperforming risk parity and equal-weighted strategies [3][25] - The strategy without currency assets yielded a return of 0.48% last month, which was lower than both the risk parity strategy and the equal-weighted strategy [3][28] Group 3 - The latest allocation recommendations suggest increasing exposure to equities and commodities, while maintaining a neutral position on bonds and gold. The final weights for equities, government bonds, commodities, and gold are set at 7.01%, 75.01%, 10.90%, and 7.08% respectively [4][32]

Market Overview - The A-share market continues to experience a volume contraction, with the Shanghai Composite Index closing at 3359.9 points, reflecting a cumulative decline of 0.51% for the week [1] - Market sentiment is generally cautious as the end of the first half of the year approaches [1] ETF Performance - Bank-related ETFs have emerged as a "safe haven" during the weak market, with several bank ETFs reaching historical highs [1][4] - The overall performance of ETF products has been lackluster, with the median weekly return for over 1100 products at approximately -0.86% [1] - The bank ETF index fund recorded a weekly increase of 3.22%, with other related products also exceeding 3% in weekly gains [4] Top Performers - The top performers for the week include multiple bank ETFs, which have all achieved historical highs [4] - The wine ETF showed a weak rebound of 2.39%, entering the gainers' list, although its long-term trend remains uncertain [4] Underperformers - The decline in the market was predominantly driven by Hong Kong innovative drug-related ETFs, all of which experienced significant downturns [5][7] - The top 20 ETFs with the largest declines were all related to Hong Kong innovative drugs, with the leading product, the Hong Kong Medical ETF, dropping by 8.617% [5][7] - Additionally, gold-related ETFs also saw substantial declines, with several products falling over 6% due to a more than 2.5% drop in international gold prices [7]

Group 1: ETF Dividend Records - Huatai-PB CSI 300 ETF announced a record dividend amount of 8.4 billion yuan, setting a new record for single fund dividends in the domestic ETF market [1] - Other ETFs such as Huaxia CSI 300 ETF and Jiashi CSI 300 ETF also reported single dividends exceeding 1 billion yuan this year, indicating a trend of increasing dividend distributions among ETFs [1] Group 2: Hong Kong Themed ETFs - In June, Hong Kong themed ETFs saw a net inflow of over 2.5 billion yuan, with several ETFs reaching historical highs in terms of shares [2] - The Huatai-PB Hong Kong Stock Connect Innovative Drug ETF reached a record share count of 4.328 billion, with a total scale of 6.538 billion yuan, marking a more than fivefold increase in share count this year [2] Group 3: Public REITs Approval - The first two public REITs focused on data centers, managed by Southern Fund, were approved for listing on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges [3] - This approval marks a significant expansion of the public REITs market in China, diversifying underlying assets to include data centers, thus meeting various investor preferences [3] Group 4: Inclusion of Sci-Tech Board ETFs - The China Securities Regulatory Commission announced the inclusion of Sci-Tech Board ETFs in the investment scope for fund advisors, aiming to attract more long-term capital [4] - As of June 17, 2025, there are 92 ETFs related to the Sci-Tech Board, with a total scale nearing 280 billion yuan, including four ETFs exceeding 10 billion yuan [4] Group 5: Launch of Sci-Tech Bond ETFs - Ten fund management companies, including E Fund and Bosera, have submitted applications for the first batch of Sci-Tech Bond ETFs [5][6] - These ETFs will track various indices related to AAA-rated technology innovation company bonds, with some set to be listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and others on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [6] Group 6: Market Performance Overview - On June 19, the market experienced a decline, with the Shanghai Composite Index falling by 0.79% and the Shenzhen Component Index by 1.21% [8] - Despite the overall market downturn, certain sectors such as oil and gas stocks showed resilience, with significant gains in related ETFs [8]