Core Viewpoint - The article introduces the "Xueqiu Three-Point Method," which enhances traditional asset allocation by incorporating global asset allocation and dynamic rebalancing strategies [2][42]. Group 1: Asset Allocation - The "Three-Point" method consists of asset diversification across stocks, bonds, and commodities [3][42]. - It emphasizes market diversification by investing in different regions such as A-shares, Hong Kong stocks, and US stocks [3][42]. - The method also includes timing diversification through regular investment (dollar-cost averaging) [3][42]. Group 2: User Experience - The tool is designed to be user-friendly, allowing investors with limited knowledge to create a portfolio that outperforms benchmarks [4][5]. - Users can manually adjust asset allocation based on their preferences after an initial questionnaire [9][11]. - The platform offers a curated selection of high-quality funds, simplifying the selection process for users [12][25]. Group 3: Fund Selection Process - Users can choose from a pool of recommended funds or opt for a pre-assembled portfolio [12][13]. - The platform provides detailed information and tags for each fund, making it easier for users to understand their investment options [24][25]. - The tool allows for the selection of various fund types, including index funds and overseas investments [16][18]. Group 4: Rebalancing and Performance Tracking - The "Three-Point Dashboard" provides weekly updates on asset valuations and market sentiment, aiding in rebalancing decisions [30][39]. - The dashboard tracks multiple key indicators to inform users about market conditions and potential adjustments [41][42]. - The article highlights a successful reallocation based on the dashboard's recommendations, demonstrating its effectiveness [32][37].

今日A股三大指数小幅下跌，截至收盘，沪指跌0.04%报3387点，深证成指跌0.12%，创业板指跌0.36%。 全天成交1.24万亿元，较前一交易日缩量 64亿元。 板块方面，脑机接口、油气、电池、核污染防治等板块涨幅居前，游戏、创新药、美容护理、IP经济等板块跌幅居前。 | < | 倍盗康 ··· Q | | --- | --- | | 870199 已收盘 06-17 15:34:55 北京 | | | 3125人加自选(一) > | | | 41.86 +9.66 +30.00% | CN 融 L1 | | 高 41.86 开 39.00 量 91575.00手 总市值 28.51亿 。 | | | . 低 38.50 换 24.62% 额 3.73亿 | 市盈TTM -- | 五日 分时 日K 月K 李K 年K 分钟 · 周K 均价:40.76 最新:41.86 +9.66 +30.00% | 86 | | 30.00% 卖5 | | | 0 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | 英4 | | | 0 | | | | 卖3 | -- | | 0 | ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of small-cap stocks in the context of the broader market, highlighting that despite recent concerns about potential pullbacks, there are indicators suggesting that small-cap stocks may still have upward potential, particularly when considering PMI and liquidity metrics [1][10]. Group 1: Market Performance - The Wind Micro-Cap Index has surged by 30.96% this year, while the traditional broad-based indices like the CSI 300 remain in negative territory [1]. - Historically, from 2009 to 2025, the annualized return of the Wind Micro-Cap Index is 28.85%, significantly outperforming the Wind All A Index at 3.71% [3]. - The strong performance of micro-cap stocks is not a recent phenomenon but has been consistent over time [4]. Group 2: Valuation Analysis - Micro-cap stocks have been driven primarily by valuation rather than earnings, with a negative EPS, and their current valuation is only slightly above the Wind All A Index, indicating no significant overvaluation at present [5][6]. - Since 2016, the valuation level of the Wind Micro-Cap Index has consistently been higher than that of the Wind All A Index, except for 2020 and 2021 [5]. Group 3: Market Sentiment and Liquidity - High market crowding in small-cap stocks is noted, but actual pullbacks require substantial negative events to trigger them [9]. - The article introduces PMI and liquidity as novel indicators for assessing the sustainability of the small-cap style, suggesting that micro-cap stocks tend to perform better when PMI is declining and liquidity is improving [10]. - Currently, the manufacturing PMI in China is fluctuating around the threshold, and the remaining liquidity has been on an upward trend since August of the previous year, which may favor micro-cap stocks [10][11].

Group 1 - The article introduces the "Xiaoxue Three-Part Method" investment strategy, which aims to provide a more scientific and sustainable investment approach to avoid losses from chasing market trends [3][4]. - The investment allocation is based on a growth-oriented plan with a ratio of 30% bonds, 60% stocks, and 10% commodities, reflecting the author's risk tolerance and investment goals [3][4]. - The bond allocation focuses on domestic bonds and U.S. dollar bonds to benefit from high yields and potential interest rate cuts, serving as a stabilizing component in the portfolio [3][4]. Group 2 - The performance of the Xiaoxue Three-Part Method portfolio showed an overall increase of 0.76% last week, with contributions from both equity and bond segments despite a turbulent domestic equity market [7]. - The article highlights the resilience of the portfolio amid geopolitical tensions, with gold prices rising by 1.56% and oil prices surging by 13.32% due to market dynamics [7][18]. - The article notes that the portfolio's year-to-date weighted return is 4.88%, with a maximum drawdown of less than 8%, indicating a balanced growth strategy [7]. Group 3 - The A-share market experienced a pullback, with major indices declining, while sectors like energy and materials showed positive performance [9][10]. - The Hong Kong market displayed mixed results, with healthcare and materials sectors performing well, while consumer sectors faced declines [12]. - U.S. stock indices faced pressure, with the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones all recording losses due to rising inflation expectations and geopolitical tensions [14]. Group 4 - The bond market showed a slight upward trend, supported by central bank signals and increased buying activity in short-term bonds [15][17]. - The article emphasizes the importance of commodity investments as a risk-hedging tool, with a recommended allocation of 10-15% to enhance portfolio performance [4][21]. - Geopolitical events have significantly impacted commodity prices, with oil prices rebounding sharply due to Middle Eastern tensions and gold prices benefiting from increased safe-haven demand [18][20].

今天三大指数低开高走，沪指缩量反弹收涨0.35%， 全市场成交额12435亿元，较上日缩量2604亿元。全市场超3500只个股上涨。 从板块来看，IP经济概念全天强势，光线传媒等多股涨停，稳定币概念领涨两市，油气股延续强势，准油股份涨停。 贵金属、汽车整车、机场、航 运等板块跌幅居前。 01 IP经济持续火热，光线传媒20%涨停 A股方面，IP经济概念也高热不退， 元隆雅图12日8板，高乐股份、美邦服饰、珠江钢琴等涨停，华谊兄弟、明月镜片等跟涨，此外，光线传媒也 在利好刺激下时隔四个月再度20CM涨停。 线下，泡泡玛特"一娃难求"的局面没有缓解。6月15日，多位网友发视频称，浙江杭州西溪天街泡泡玛特新店当天开业，但仅两小时商品就被买 完，提前关门，消息冲上热搜榜首。 分析人士认为， 与传统强调实用性的消费品不同， Labubu 所代表的潮玩核心在于提供"情绪满足"和"精神投射"。消费者购买Labubu，并非仅仅 为了一个摆件，更是为了表达自我、寻求与同频人群的连接与归属感。 泡泡玛特股价飙升，还带动近期A股IP经济概念股跟涨。开源证券分析师薛凯强表示，在盲盒市场中，热门IP与品牌是吸引消费者的关键因素。 LA ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the long-term bullish outlook for gold, driven by continuous money printing by central banks and the inherent value of gold as a hedge against inflation and currency devaluation [3][21][57]. Group 1: Historical Performance of Gold - From December 1990 to June 2025, gold prices increased from $388 to $3452.60 per ounce, representing a total increase of 789.85% over 34.51 years, with an annualized return of 6.54% [4]. - Gold experienced two significant drawdowns: a maximum drawdown of -39.12% from February 1996 to July 1999 and -44.36% from September 2011 to December 2015 [7][10]. - After each major drawdown, gold prices eventually reached new highs, indicating resilience in the long-term trend [8]. Group 2: Recent Trends in Gold Prices - From July 2015 to June 2025, gold prices rose by 228.76%, continuing an upward trend for 9.5 years [14]. - Since January 2024, gold prices have increased by 66.65%, from $2071.8 to $3452.60 [18]. - In 2024, gold prices rose by 27.39%, and in 2025, they have already increased by 30.81% [21]. Group 3: Factors Influencing Gold Prices - The relationship between the US dollar index and gold prices is often negative, with periods of both strong and weak correlation observed [22]. - Key factors affecting gold prices include Federal Reserve interest rate decisions, US debt creditworthiness, economic recession risks, trade wars, geopolitical tensions, and demand for gold in jewelry and industrial applications [24][26][29][30]. - Central banks globally are increasing their gold reserves, with notable purchases from countries like Poland and China [41][44]. Group 4: Market Dynamics and Future Outlook - The article discusses the potential impact of US debt ceiling negotiations on market stability and gold prices, highlighting the risks associated with political gridlock [38][40]. - The ongoing trend of central banks accumulating gold is expected to support long-term price increases, as seen in recent data showing significant purchases [41][46]. - The overall sentiment remains bullish for gold, with the expectation that even if short-term fluctuations occur, the long-term upward trajectory will prevail [57].

以下文章来源于思想钢印 ，作者思想钢印 思想钢印 . 雪球2020年度十大影响力用户，私募基金经理 风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者：思想钢印9999 来源：雪球 涨时无限溺爱，下跌时吹毛求疵 01 市场从来都是势利的 2020~21年，由于泡泡玛特的火爆，市场上出现了大量盲盒类公司，传统的巨头也向这一领域 拓展，当时市场最担心的是竞争格局恶化，这也是中国大部分行业的通病。 实际上我并不担心这个问题，盲盒的公司虽多，但形成"IP全产业链闭环"的，只此一家，而且 这一全产业链模式的壁垒很高，形成有一定的偶然性，很难复制，"塑料茅台"并不夸张，事实 证明，竞争格局反而不是问题。 真正的危险是这种模式本身的周期性危机，以及发展战略与经营管理上容易出现的一些失误。 02 库存与竞争加剧 2022年，公司进入经营低谷，全年营收增长2.8%，净利润下降44%，毛利下降4个百分点至 57.5%。而被认为是受益于疫情的线上零售，营收已经变成同比下降-1.7%，天猫旗舰店更是 下降-23%，所以不能把泡泡玛特2022年业绩下降简单归因于疫情与封控的影响。 了解一个有钱人 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article introduces the "China Securities Stock-Bond Constant Series Index," which combines stocks and bonds to provide investors with asset allocation tools with varying stock-bond ratios, emphasizing the importance of dividend, cash flow, and core broad-based categories in A-share asset allocation [3][4]. Group 1: Index Overview - The China Securities Index has released six series of stock-bond constant indices, totaling 24 individual indices, including the Shanghai Dividend Stock-Bond and the Dividend Low-Volatility Stock-Bond series [7][8]. - These indices adopt a higher bond ratio, leading to a more stable long-term performance, with expected returns close to "fixed income+" [8]. Group 2: Stock-Bond Allocation Strategy - The stock-bond allocation strategy is a common asset allocation approach, enhancing portfolio stability by balancing the high volatility of stocks with the stability of bonds [4]. - Common stock-bond ratios include Graham's recommended 50/50 strategy, a more aggressive 70/30, and a conservative 30/70 [4]. Group 3: Index Composition - The Shanghai Dividend Stock-Bond series consists of the Shanghai Dividend Index and the Shanghai 0-5 Year High-Grade Credit Bond Yield Strategy Index, with ratios of 10:90, 20:80, and 30:70 [9]. - The Dividend Stock-Bond series combines the China Securities Dividend Index with the China Securities 0-5 Year High-Grade Credit Bond Yield Strategy Index, also using the same ratios [10]. - The Dividend Low-Volatility Stock-Bond series includes the China Securities 800 Dividend Low-Volatility Index and the China Government Bond Index, maintaining the same ratios [11]. - The A500 Exchange Stock-Bond series uses the China Securities A500 Index and a combination of exchange government bonds and policy financial bonds, with five allocation levels [12]. - The Cash Flow Exchange Stock-Bond series employs the China Securities 800 Free Cash Flow Index and the same bond combination, also with five allocation levels [13]. - The Dividend Low-Volatility Exchange Stock-Bond series utilizes the China Securities 800 Dividend Low-Volatility Index and the bond combination, maintaining five allocation levels [14]. Group 4: Performance Analysis - All indices have achieved positive returns due to their higher bond ratios, indicating a favorable long-term holding experience [19]. - As the stock allocation increases, the returns of most indices tend to rise, although the increase in annualized volatility often outpaces the rise in returns [20]. - Recent performance of dividend, low-volatility, and cash flow indices has been strong, but past performance does not guarantee future results [21]. Group 5: Investment Considerations - The article suggests that for lower risk tolerance, the bond ratio can be adjusted to 70% or more, akin to a fixed income+ strategy, while those who can tolerate some volatility may increase stock allocations [23]. - It emphasizes the importance of diversifying stock selections across dividend, low-volatility, cash flow, and core broad-based indices [23]. - The construction of a government bond and policy financial bond combination is proposed as a strategy for bond asset selection, considering the level of risk-free interest rates [23].

风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者： 倔强的挖挖机 来源：雪球 银行股开始吸引市场眼球了 ， 所以大家看银行股多了起来 ， 回望看 ， 发现A股银行指数两年 已经上涨50% ， h沪银行指数两年上涨70% ， 自然冒出了"涨多了"的念头 。 银行股真的涨多了吗 ？ 我们来认真分析一下本轮银行股的起始发展 ， 来搞清楚目前银行行情所处位置 （ 从这里开始 ， 本文非常重要 ， 大家要认真看完 ） : 本轮银行股起源于2022年10月 ， 那一时期 ， 恒大倒了 ， 中特估的言论被首次提及 ！ 六大行 ， 率先起涨 ， 顶着恒大破产的压力 ， 验证了那句老话:靴子落地 ， 股价起涨 。 当讲 了五年"狼来了"的故事兑现后 ， 股价制约因素消除 ， 开始上涨 。 其中最便宜的交通银行 ， 当时股息率已经达到10% ， 市净率0.35倍 ， 更是在2021年4就已经压不住 ， 第一个上涨 ！ 行情进入到2023年 ， 六大行率先完成第一轮上涨 ， 进入修整 ， 恰逢消费向下 ， 经济背景弱 ， 招行 ， 宁波 ， 兴业 ， 平银等高质量银行大幅补跌 ， 整体银行 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of identifying companies with deep economic moats for long-term investment success, highlighting that many investors confuse short-term advantages with long-term barriers [2][3]. Group 1: Economic Moats - The article categorizes economic moats into six types: brand premium, network effects, scale cost advantages, high user switching costs, core technology barriers, and resource exclusivity [3]. - Brand value is not just about recognition but also about consumers' willingness to pay a premium [3]. - Network effects create a positive feedback loop where the value of a platform increases with more users [3]. Group 2: Misconceptions about Moats - Common misconceptions that can lead to investment risks include: technology leadership that is easily iterated, reliance on a single blockbuster product, short-term traffic benefits, channel advantages under pressure, and over-dependence on management capabilities [3]. - These factors may provide temporary growth but lack structural barriers, making them less reliable for long-term investment [3]. Group 3: Investment Analysis - In dynamic competitive markets, the strength of an economic moat determines investment certainty [3]. - Instead of chasing superficial high-growth data, it is crucial to analyze whether a company possesses pricing power or user lock-in capabilities [3].