电子周观点： 关注 2025 台北国际电脑展 AI 新动向。以"AI Next"为主题的 COMPUTEX 2025 将于 5 月 20-23 日在台北南 港展览中心举行。此次活动将吸引近 1400 家参展商，展示人工智能与机器人、新一代技术、未来移动三大主题。 英伟达 CEO 黄仁勋将发表主题演讲，包括 GeForce、AI 加速器及 Omniverse 平台的最新进展。英伟达与联发 科合作开发的 Arm 架构 PC 处理器有望正式亮相，标志着英伟达加速布局 Windows-on-Arm 生态体系，英伟达 首席执行官黄仁勋与联发科执行长蔡力行将发表演讲，预计将正式宣布 N1X 与 N1 系列处理器，这些新品将结 合联发科的 Arm 架构 CPU 与 Nvidia 的 Blackwell 架构 GPU，面向高性能 AI 桌面与笔电设备，构建代号为 GB10 的新平台。AMD CEO 苏姿丰博士也将发表演讲，展示公司在 GPU、AI 和数据中心领域的整体布局。高通公司 总裁兼 CEO 安蒙也将在 COMPUTEX 2025 上发表演讲，分享骁龙 X 系列平台在 AI 时代取得的显著进展与未 来规划，并展示终端侧 ...

【一周一议】 吉林化纤宣布上调湿法 3k 碳纤维价格。5 月 13 日，吉林化纤发布调价通知，受低空经济拉动，无人机需求，出口爆 增，湿法碳纤维良好的易加工性影响，公司旗下的湿法 3k 碳纤维供不应求，即日起各牌号产品每吨分别上涨 10000 元。碳纤维复合材料由于其①质轻且强度高，②耐腐蚀性，③耐高温性，④抗电磁干扰等优异性能，已成为低空经济 飞行器的核心轻量化材料。整体而言，目前碳纤维复合材料约占无人机结构总质量的 60-80%。根据中国低空经济联盟 发布的《低空经济发展趋势报告》预测，到 2030 年我国 eVTOL 市场保有量有望突破 10 万架，根据我们测算，2030 年 我国 eVTOL 行业拉动碳纤维增量约 2.04 万吨（非单年拉动量，10 万架为 2030 年市场保有量）。2024 年我国碳纤维需 求为 6.03 万吨，有望成为碳纤维下一个关键增长极。同时，低空经济增量政策持续出台，如 5 月 13 日，四川公布《支 持低空经济发展的若干政策措施》，省发改委主任代永波表示，四川将每年统筹安排 3 亿元省级资金，专项支持低空 经济发展。 关注"一带一路"进展。本周"一带一路"热点事件不断，1） ...

行情回顾 本周板块表现：上周（2025/05/12-2025/05/16）5 个交易日，SW 机械设备指数上涨 0.35%，在申万 31 个一级行 业分类中排名第 18；同期沪深 300 指数上涨 1.12%。2025 年至今表现：SW 机械设备指数上涨 9.47%，在申万 31 个一级行业分类中排名第 3；同期沪深 300 指数下跌 1.16%。 核心观点 投资建议 见"股票组合"。 风险提示 宏观经济变化风险；原材料价格波动风险；政策变化的风险。 敬请参阅最后一页特别声明 1 两机景气上行+国产化提速，看好应流股份订单高增。全球 AI 数据中心扩张带动燃机需求上行，2024-2026 年 全球燃机年均销量均值预计为 60GW，较 23 年的 44.1GW 提升 36%，增长加速。此外，近期"两机"国产化加速 推进，燃机方面，近期应流股份承担的某型重型燃气轮机透平第二级动叶铸件通过首件鉴定，标志着国家燃气 轮机重大专项取得又一阶段性成果。航空发动机方面，4 月，我国完全自研的 AG600 飞机获颁中国民航局型号 合格证，标志着全球起飞重量最大的民用水陆两栖飞机通过了严格测试和验证。公司是国内"两机"叶片龙 ...

本周化工市场综述 本周市场由于关税缓和超预期而上涨，但关税方案公布开始向下，其中申万化工指数上涨 1.82%，跑赢沪深 300 指数 0.7%，申万石化指数上涨 0.65%，跑输沪深 300 指数 0.47%。标的方面，本周军工概念表现强势，比如：渝三峡 A、集泰股份、苏州龙杰、尤夫股份、吉林化纤，其次是机器人主题，比如：新瀚新材、七彩化学、斯迪克，最后是 关税缓和受益股，比如：聚合顺、安利股份、利安隆。关税方面，我们在上周周报强调关税有缓和的趋势，因为短 期关税冲突升级到了一个极端，逻辑上钟摆往回摆的概率提升，本周我们观察到中美各取消了共计 91%的加征关税， 无论是谈判的进展和关税的下降幅度均超预期，短期内前期超跌的出口链有修复的可能，比如：纺服链、电子材料 产业链；另外，在这 90 天的关税休战期，美国产业链加速补库的概率较高，库存低位+格局较佳+美国出口占比较大 的产品有可能会迎来量价齐升，但由于持续性看不清楚，未必会成为短期主线。油价方面，地缘风险边际向好，比 如：乌克兰准备无条件停火至少 30 天、伊朗称愿与美国达成协议，油价在接下来可能会逐步回归基本面，在需求没 有明显下行的前提下，我们认为油价 ...

板块市场回顾 本周（5/10-5/16）交运指数上涨 2.1%，沪深 300 指数上涨 1.1%,跑赢大盘 1.0%，排名 4/29。交运子板块中航运板块 涨幅最大(+7.4%)，快递板块跌幅最大(-1.3%)。 行业观点 快递：4 月快递业务量同比增长 19.1%，单票收入同比下降 7%。上周（5 月 5 日-5 月 11 日）邮政快递累计揽收量约 38.71 亿件，环比+9.2%，同比+15.8%；累计投递量约 37.93 亿件，环比+2.8%，同比+19.4%。2025 年 4 月，快递企业 深耕明前茶、蔬果、鲜花、医药、珠宝、汽车配件等领域，积极服务现代农业与先进制造业，畅通逆向寄递服务渠道， 有力支撑消费品"以旧换新"，满足消费者多元化寄递需求，推动业务规模稳步扩增，较 2024 年提前 18 天突破 500 亿件。2025 年 4 月，快递业务收入完成 1212.8 亿元，同比增长 10.8%；快递业务量完成 163.2 亿件，同比增长 19.1%； 快递单票收入为 7.43 元，同比下降 7%。1-4 月，快递与包裹服务品牌集中度指数 CR8 为 86.7，较 1-3 月下降 0.2。 考虑估值 ...

城投债：城投债加权平均成交期限徘徊在 2.21 年附近。其中四川省级、陕西省级城投债久期已逾 6 年，河北省级城 投债久期缩短明显。同时，江苏地市级、江苏区县级、浙江地级市、北京区县级、广东区县级、四川省级、河南省级、 江西地级市、安徽省级、安徽地级市、陕西省级、广西省级、云南省级城投债久期历史分位数已逾 90%，江苏区县级 城投债久期逼近 2021 年以来最高。 产业债：产业债加权平均成交期限较上周有所拉长，总体处于 2.72 年附近，食品饮料行业成交久期缩短幅度较大， 缩短至 1.30 年，公用事业行业成交久期拉长至 3.17 年。此外，食品饮料等行业成交久期处于较低历史分位，公用事 业、交通运输、钢铁、有色金属等行业均位于 90%以上的历史分位。 商业银行债：银行永续债久期较上周小幅缩短至 3.52 年，处于 63.8%的历史分位，高于去年同期水平。二级资本债久 期拉长至 4.09 年，处于 91.2%的历史分位，高于去年同期水平；一般商金债久期拉长至 2.21 年，处于的 78.2%历史 分位数，高于去年同期水平。 其余金融债：从加权平均成交期限来看，保险公司债＞证券次级债＞证券公司债＞租赁公司债，分 ...

Investment Rating - The report assigns a "Buy" rating to the company, expecting a price increase of over 15% in the next 6-12 months [4]. Core Insights - The company reported a revenue of HKD 16.9 billion for FY25, a decrease of 8.2% year-on-year, and a net profit of HKD 2.06 billion, down 10.4% year-on-year. The second half of FY25 saw revenue and net profit decline by 9.2% and 20.8%, respectively [1]. - The domestic market faced significant pressure, while the North American and European markets showed relative strength, with revenue growth of 3.2% and 19.2%, respectively [1][3]. - The company maintained a favorable dividend payout ratio of 50.8% for FY25, with a total dividend of HKD 0.27 per share [1]. Performance Analysis - Domestic sales were notably pressured, with a year-on-year decline of 16.5% in China, while North America and Europe experienced growth [1]. - The company’s gross margin improved by 1.1 percentage points to 40.5% due to a decrease in raw material costs, despite a decline in net margin by 0.3 percentage points to 12.8% [2]. - The company’s sofa sales volume decreased by 0.9% globally and 10.6% in China, indicating pricing pressure [1]. Financial Projections - The projected earnings per share (EPS) for FY26, FY27, and FY28 are HKD 0.52, HKD 0.57, and HKD 0.61, respectively, with corresponding price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios of 8X, 8X, and 7X [4][10].

量化信用策略 截至 5 月 9 日数据，银行永续债及券商债策略近期胜率不低。从策略期限来看，上周短端策略超额收益有限，城投下 沉组合落后于中长端基准；中长端策略方面，除城投久期、哑铃型策略外，其余策略组合超额收益均为正，其中，金 融债与非金信用重仓策略近四周累计超额收益进一步拉开差距，尤其是金融债久期策略近期收益弹性有所增加。 品种久期跟踪 二级资本债成交久期创年内最高。截至 5 月 9 日，城投债、产业债成交期限分别加权于 2.09 年、2.51 年，城投债与 产业债均处于 2021 年 3 月以来 90%以上分位数水平，商业银行债中，二级资本债、银行永续债以及一般商金债加权平 均成交期限分别为 4.19 年、3.59 年、2.30 年；从其余金融债来看，证券公司债、证券次级债、保险公司债、租赁公 司债久期分别为 1.58 年、1.98 年、3.75 年、1.27 年，其中证券公司债、证券次级债位于较低历史分位，保险公司 债、租赁公司债位于较高历史分位。 票息资产热度图谱 截至 2025 年 5 月 12 日，存量信用债中，民企地产债估值收益率及利差整体高于其他品种。与节前一周相比，非金融 非地产类产业债收 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - In Q1 2025, the number of newly issued bond funds continued to decline, and the fundraising scale shrank to less than 100 billion yuan. This is related to the pressure on the bond market and the prominent stock - bond seesaw effect. The outstanding share of bond funds decreased to 9.03 trillion shares at the end of Q1 [2][5][11]. - Public funds switched their preferences and returned to increasing the allocation of coupon - bearing assets. In Q1, funds concentrated on increasing the allocation of bank sub - debt, slightly increased the allocation of general credit bonds, and reduced the allocation of general commercial financial bonds for three consecutive quarters [3][5][20]. - For urban investment bonds, funds focused on the certainty of short - end sinking, with the proportion of bonds within 2 years reaching two - thirds. In terms of regional distribution, funds increased their holdings of urban investment bonds in Zhejiang, Shandong, and Tianjin, and significantly extended the holding duration of Chongqing urban investment bonds [3][5][28]. - For industrial bonds, funds preferred to increase their holdings in the building decoration industry. Public utilities, comprehensive, and transportation were still the top three industries with the largest heavy - holding scale. The proportion of industrial bonds within 1 year reached a new high [4][5][43]. - For financial bonds, funds rediscovered niche varieties. They repurchased small and medium - sized bank sub - debt and shifted their allocation strategy from long - term secondary capital bonds to short - term bonds. The holding scale of insurance bonds reached a record high [4][5][49]. Summary by Directory 1. Overview of Incremental Funds: Bond Market Volatility and Decline in Bond Fund Scale - In Q1 2025, 57 new bond - type funds were issued, with a fundraising scale of 87.8 billion yuan, the lowest in the past three years. Compared with Q4 2024 and the same period last year, there was a significant gap [2][11]. - Affected by factors such as increased capital - side fluctuations and overseas disturbances, the bond market sentiment was poor, while the stock market attracted incremental funds due to the "tech bull" market. The index of ordinary stock - type and partial - stock hybrid funds rose by 4.7% compared with the previous quarter, while the overall bond - type fund index only rose by 0.02% quarter - on - quarter. Short - term bond funds and money market funds had better defensiveness, and long - term bond funds declined. The outstanding share of bond - type funds decreased by 0.44 trillion shares quarter - on - quarter to 9.03 trillion shares at the end of Q1 [2][15]. 2. Preference from Heavy - Holding Bonds: Consistency in Short - Bond Allocation - Public funds increased their heavy - holding scale of credit bonds by 3.2% quarter - on - quarter to 80.65 billion yuan in Q1 2025, a relatively obvious signal of increasing holdings since Q1 last year. At the same time, the holding scale of interest - rate bonds decreased by 103.1 billion yuan quarter - on - quarter, with a reduction of over 3% [20]. - **Urban Investment Bonds**: - Funds maintained a stable allocation of urban investment bonds, mainly concentrating on AA +, AA, and AA(2) grades. The holding proportion of AA and below grades remained stable at around 56%. As of the end of April, the net financing of urban investment bonds was weaker than in previous years [28]. - The holding duration of urban investment bonds was mainly within 2 years, accounting for two - thirds. The proportion of bonds over 3 years was controlled within 15% [3][28][32]. - In terms of regional distribution, funds increased their holdings of urban investment bonds in Zhejiang, Shandong, and Tianjin, with the holding scale increasing by more than 1 billion yuan quarter - on - quarter. Zhejiang, Shandong, and Jiangsu were still the top three regions in terms of absolute holding scale [35]. - The holding duration of Chongqing urban investment bonds was significantly extended by 1.04 years quarter - on - quarter to 2.19 years. The holding durations of urban investment bonds in North China regions such as Hebei, Henan, and Beijing also slightly increased [39]. - **Industrial Bonds**: - Funds preferred to increase their holdings in the building decoration industry, with an increase of 2.5 billion yuan quarter - on - quarter. Public utilities, comprehensive, and transportation were still the top three industries with the largest heavy - holding scale, with heavy - holding scales of 24.9 billion yuan, 19.6 billion yuan, and 10.4 billion yuan respectively [43]. - The proportion of industrial bonds within 1 year reached a new high, while the proportion of bonds over 2 years decreased. Overall, the proportion of industrial bonds within 3 years was about 74%. The holding duration of transportation industry bonds was extended to over 2 years, and the duration of coal bonds was also extended by about 0.4 years [4][46]. - **Financial Bonds**: - Funds repurchased small and medium - sized bank sub - debt. The holding scale of small and medium - sized bank sub - debt increased by 5.4 billion yuan in Q1, accounting for 15% of the total secondary - tier and perpetual bonds. The allocation of secondary capital bonds slowed down compared with Q4 last year, while funds turned to net buying of bank perpetual bonds [49]. - The allocation strategy shifted from long - term secondary capital bonds to short - term bonds. Funds increased their holdings of secondary capital bonds within 1 year the most, with the proportion rising to 28%. For bank perpetual bonds, shorter - term bonds within 1 year and 1 - 2 years were more preferred [53]. - The holding scale of insurance bonds reached a record high. Funds had increased their holdings of this variety for three consecutive quarters. As of the end of Q1, the heavy - holding scale of insurance bonds reached 1.66 billion yuan [57].

公司是全球最大风电运营商，技改+自建+集团注入多元驱动装机 增长。公司背靠国能集团，是以新能源业务为主的大型综合性发 电集团。集团面临清洁化转型压力，公司承担约 30GW 新能源装机 增量指标。21~24 年已累计新增新能源装机约 17GW，25 年力争投 产 5GW。背靠身为头部发电央企的集团，在融资成本、资金规模等 方面具有优势；并且拥有多能互补的装机结构，在煤炭、化工、 运输等板块布局，业务协同效果好、项目资源获取能力强。公司 24 年取得开发指标 14.7GW，待开发项目资源充足。6M23 能源局发 布文件鼓励并网运行超过 15 年或单机容量小于 1.5MW 的风电场开 展改造升级。早期风电场资源优渥，但受限于设备未能充分利用。 公司是中国最早开发风电的专业化公司，符合技改要求的存量项 目储备充足；过去 3 年资产减值已为"以大代小"腾出 168 万千 瓦空间，25 年计划投产技改项目约 37 万千瓦。 新能源进入全面市场化新阶段，风电资产脱颖而出。"136 号文" 标志着新能源进入全面入市的新阶段，风电出力的非同时性特征 使其现货市场交易电价、利用率情况好于光伏。在市场化交易电 价折价 20%的假设 ...