Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for the company, anticipating a price increase of over 15% in the next 6-12 months [5]. Core Insights - The company reported a revenue of 340.37 billion RMB for the first three quarters of 2025, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 32.5%, with an adjusted net profit of 32.82 billion RMB, up 73.5% [2]. - The AIoT platform has connected over 1.035 billion IoT devices, marking a 20.2% increase year-on-year, surpassing major global competitors [2]. - The company is focusing on high-end smartphone positioning, with the Xiaomi 17 series seeing over 80% of its sales from Pro and Pro Max models, and a 24.1% share in the high-end smartphone market in mainland China [3]. - The IoT and consumer products segment achieved a revenue of 27.6 billion RMB in Q3 2025, with a gross margin of 23.9%, up 3.2 percentage points year-on-year [3]. - The internet services segment saw a revenue increase of 10.8% year-on-year, with overseas internet service revenue growing by 34.9% [4]. - The automotive business is showing positive trends, with the YU7 model delivering 108,796 units, a 32.6% increase quarter-on-quarter, contributing to profitability [4]. Summary by Sections Performance Review - For Q3 2025, the company achieved a revenue of 113.12 billion RMB, a 22.3% increase year-on-year, and an adjusted net profit of 11.31 billion RMB, up 80.9% [2]. Business Analysis - The smartphone segment generated 46 billion RMB in revenue in Q3 2025, with a global shipment of 43.4 million units, maintaining a market share of 16.7% globally and 13.6% in China [3]. - The IoT and consumer products segment's revenue reached 27.6 billion RMB, with a focus on smart home appliances and a new factory for smart appliances [3]. Internet Services - The internet services segment's revenue was 9.4 billion RMB in Q3 2025, with a notable increase in overseas revenue [4]. Automotive Business - The automotive segment is on track with the YU7 model's deliveries, indicating a positive trend towards profitability despite some margin pressures [4]. Profit Forecast and Valuation - The adjusted EPS forecasts for 2025, 2026, and 2027 are 1.7, 2.0, and 2.6 RMB respectively, with corresponding PE ratios of 23.89, 20.53, and 15.03 [5].

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided. 2. Core Viewpoints - On October 31, 2025, the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the Asset Management Association of China jointly released the "Guidelines for Performance Comparison Benchmarks of Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds (Exposure Draft)" and the "Operating Rules for Performance Comparison Benchmarks of Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds (Exposure Draft)", which stipulate fund performance rankings, style classifications, and style deviations [2]. - From a quantitative perspective, the report characterizes investable stock pools and fund styles under different styles, providing reference solutions for fund companies' risk control and product departments to implement regulatory documents [2]. - In the stock pool section, focusing on sector, industry, and thematic funds, the report expands the investable space and optimizes risk - return of traditional sector stock pools such as technology through the quantitative construction of the "technological innovation" investable pool while ensuring relatively controllable tracking errors [2][9]. - At the fund style characterization level, in addition to the traditional large - small cap and growth - value styles, strategy styles such as sentiment, GARP, and contrarian are introduced to further depict fund managers' capabilities and profiles [2]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1科技创新股票池定义 (Definition of Technological Innovation Stock Pool) - Traditional market - cap or growth - value style stock pools have clear benchmark index references from regulators, with relatively broad benchmark index thresholds, providing sufficient investment space for fund managers [9]. - For sector, industry, and thematic funds, the pain points of stock pools are: limited investable space when strictly following the benchmark index sample space, and lack of freedom for active fund managers with no guaranteed performance advantage over passive funds; when expanding the investable range, it is necessary to ensure the sector's characteristics while expanding the investable space [9]. - Taking the "technological innovation" investable pool as an example, the report expands the investable space and optimizes risk - return of traditional sector stock pools such as technology while ensuring relatively controllable tracking errors [9]. 3.2基金投资与策略风格 (Fund Investment and Strategy Styles) - **Fund Classification**: Funds are classified by investment type (position), style (including market - cap, growth - value, and strategy styles), sector, industry, theme, and individual stock characteristics such as position concentration and turnover rate. Strategy styles include sentiment, GARP, quality - growth, contrarian, trend, and dividend strategies [23]. - **Advanced Strategy Characterization Case: Contrarian Strategy**: To judge a fund's contrarian strategy, it is required that the average proportion of long - term dark - horse stocks reaches 50%, and a 50% win - rate is used as the judgment threshold for ability selection. The nature of long - term continuously held dark - horse stocks is also an important reference for the contrarian strategy. Market - concentrated stocks are defined, and the proportion of dark - horse stocks in a fund's heavy - position stocks and the win - rate of dark - horse stock selection are calculated [30][31]. 3.3产品特征与投资能力圈匹配:长期跑赢基准的基础 (Matching Product Characteristics with Investment Capability Circles: The Foundation for Long - Term Outperformance of Benchmarks) - Measuring a fund manager's capability circle is an important basis for product design or benchmark selection. Taking industry allocation ability as an example, it is necessary to measure the radius of the fund manager's capability circle and investment strength in each industry. The fund manager's time and energy input in an industry should be reflected in a higher allocation ratio in historical positions, but high allocation does not necessarily mean excellent investment strength. It is also necessary to calculate stock - selection and timing abilities and measure the breadth and depth of the fund manager's capability circle from multiple angles such as multi - period average industry allocation ratio, average excess return, excess return win - rate, timing return, and timing win - rate. The report also conducts a capability boundary study on popular tracks [35].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for the company, anticipating significant growth in the next 6-12 months [4]. Core Insights - The company reported a revenue of $57 billion for FY26Q3, representing a year-on-year increase of 62% and a quarter-on-quarter increase of 22%. Data center revenue was $51.2 billion, up 66% year-on-year and 25% quarter-on-quarter. The GAAP gross margin was 73.4%, with a net profit of $31.9 billion, a 65% increase year-on-year [2]. - The company is optimistic about the AI industry's demand, with strong performance in cloud services and full utilization of deployed GPUs. The company expects to maintain a gross margin of around 75% despite rising upstream costs [3]. Summary by Sections Performance Review - For FY26Q3, the company achieved a revenue of $57 billion, with a GAAP gross margin of 73.4% and a net profit of $31.9 billion, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 65% [2]. Operational Analysis - The GB300 product line has successfully ramped up, contributing significantly to the Blackwell series revenue. The Hopper series continues to see demand, generating approximately $2 billion in revenue for FY26Q3. The company anticipates the Rubin series to begin mass production in the second half of 2026 [3]. Profit Forecast and Valuation - The company is projected to achieve GAAP net profits of $116.1 billion, $205.2 billion, and $283.4 billion for FY26, FY27, and FY28, respectively, with year-on-year growth rates of 60%, 76%, and 38% [4].

Report Summary 1. Core View - Due to the narrowing of long - bond spreads to the lowest level since 2024, institutional investors have different views on the allocation of ultra - long credit bonds. With insufficient spread protection and uncertainty about the inflection point, if there are floating profits in ultra - long credit bonds, it is recommended to focus on the profit - taking strategy in the short term [5]. 2. Summary by Directory 2.1 Stock Market Characteristics - Ultra - long credit bond yields have marginally adjusted back. Due to the compression of long - bond spreads to the lowest level since 2024, institutional investors' attitudes towards the allocation of ultra - long credit bonds have diverged, and profit - taking behavior has led to a slight adjustment in yields. The number of outstanding ultra - long credit bonds with a yield of 2.4% - 2.5% has increased to 299 [2][12]. 2.2 Primary Issuance Situation - The supply of ultra - long credit bonds has reached the bottom. This week, the total issuance scale of new ultra - long credit bonds was 2.3 billion, and only two urban investment entities, Beijing Infrastructure Investment and Anhui Investment Group, issued long - term bonds with a term of 7 years or more (preferred exercise). Although the trading sentiment in the cash bond market has weakened, investors' enthusiasm for participating in the primary market allocation of ultra - long urban investment bonds remains high [3][21]. 2.3 Secondary Transaction Performance - The upward trend of the ultra - long credit bond index has significantly slowed down. This week, the general credit bond index above 7 years has slightly increased. The 7 - 10 - year AA+ credit bond index has increased by 0.03%, and the AA+ credit bond index above 10 years has only increased by 0.11%, performing weaker than long - term interest - rate bonds [29]. - The trading volume of ultra - long credit bonds has significantly decreased. After three consecutive weeks of increase, the spread of general credit bonds above 7 years has been compressed to a low level. The spread between 7 - 10 - year industrial bonds and 20 - 30 - year treasury bonds has narrowed to 21bp. Concerned about the insufficient protection space of long - term credit spreads, the number of trading transactions of ultra - long general credit bonds has dropped to 315 this week, a decrease of 35.7% compared with the previous week [32]. - The intensity of buying ultra - long credit bonds at a low valuation has weakened significantly compared with the previous two weeks, and some urban investment long - term bond varieties have even shifted to high - valuation transactions. The proportion of TKN transactions in credit bonds above 10 years has dropped to 54.2% [37]. 3. Industry Investment Rating The document does not mention the industry investment rating.

Group 1: Overall Situation of Credit Bonds - As of November 17, 2025, private enterprise real estate bonds and industrial bonds in the stock credit bonds have higher overall valuation yields and spreads than other varieties [2][8]. - Compared with last week, the yields of most non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds have declined. In particular, the yields of 1 - year - within public perpetual and 3 - 5 - year private non - perpetual bonds of private enterprise varieties have decreased by 11.2BP and 5.4BP respectively; more than half of the real estate bond varieties have seen a decline in yields, with the 2 - year - within state - owned private non - perpetual bonds declining by more than 2.5BP, while the public non - perpetual bonds of the same term have adjusted [2][3][8]. Group 2: Urban Investment Bonds Public Urban Investment Bonds - In public urban investment bonds, the weighted average valuation yields of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces are both below 2.5%; urban investment bonds with yields exceeding 4.5% are found in district - level areas of Guizhou; in other regions, the spreads in Yunnan, Gansu and other places are also relatively high [2][15]. - Compared with last week, the yields of more than half of the public urban investment bonds have declined, with the average decline of 3 - 5 - year varieties reaching 1.2BP. Specifically, the varieties with relatively large declines in yields include 3 - 5 - year non - perpetual bonds in district - level areas of Henan, 3 - 5 - year non - perpetual bonds in district - level areas of Guizhou, and 1 - year - within and 2 - 3 - year perpetual bonds in district - level areas of Guangxi [2][15]. Private Urban Investment Bonds - In private urban investment bonds, the weighted average valuation yields of coastal provinces such as Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Fujian are below 2.85%; varieties with yields higher than 3.5% are found in prefecture - level and district - level areas of Yunnan and Guizhou, as well as district - level areas of Gansu; the spreads in other regions such as Guangxi and Qinghai are also relatively high [2][23]. - Compared with last week, the yields of private urban investment bonds have generally declined, with the average decline of 3 - 5 - year varieties reaching 2.6BP. Specifically, the varieties with relatively large declines in yields include 1 - year - within perpetual bonds in prefecture - level areas of Fujian, 2 - 3 - year perpetual bonds in prefecture - level areas of Hebei, 2 - 3 - year non - perpetual bonds in district - level areas of Shanxi, and 1 - 2 - year non - perpetual bonds in prefecture - level areas of Ningxia, with corresponding declines of 8.6BP, 9.3BP, 12.6BP, and 22.7BP respectively [2][23]. Group 3: Financial Bonds - In financial bonds, the varieties with relatively high valuation yields and spreads include capital replenishment tools of urban and rural commercial banks and leasing company bonds [4][8]. - Compared with last week, the overall yields of financial bonds have declined, but there are differences among terms. Specifically, the yields of 2 - 3 - year and 3 - 5 - year private non - perpetual leasing bonds have decreased by more than 3.5BP, while the yields of 2 - year - within private and 1 - year - within public non - perpetual varieties have increased slightly; the trading sentiment of bank sub - bonds has improved, especially the yields of 1 - 2 - year rural commercial bank and 1 - year - within urban commercial bank perpetual bonds have decreased by 8.2BP and 6.6BP respectively; the yields of commercial financial bonds have also mainly declined, among which the 1 - 2 - year varieties of joint - stock banks and urban commercial banks have yield declines of 3.4BP and 2.9BP respectively; in addition, the performance of ordinary bonds of securities companies is stronger than that of sub - bonds, and the yields of private non - perpetual bonds over 1 year have all declined significantly [4][8].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for the company, indicating an expected price increase of over 15% in the next 6-12 months [4][11]. Core Insights - The company's Q3 2025 financial results show significant growth in vehicle sales and revenue, with a total of 174,000 new cars sold, representing a year-on-year increase of 101.8% and a quarter-on-quarter increase of 29.6%. Total revenue reached 19.45 billion yuan, up 97.3% year-on-year and 36.7% quarter-on-quarter [1]. - The gross margin for Q3 2025 was 14.5%, an increase of 6.4 percentage points year-on-year, while the net profit for the quarter was 150 million yuan, marking a turnaround from losses in the previous year [2][3]. - The company is expected to continue its strong operational performance, driven by a robust new car cycle and strong overseas market expansion. The report highlights the company's competitive advantages in product development and low manufacturing costs [2][4]. Summary by Sections Financial Performance - Q3 2025 saw the company sell 174,000 vehicles, with revenue of 19.45 billion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 101.8% and a quarter-on-quarter growth of 29.6%. The average selling price (ASP) per vehicle was 111,900 yuan, showing a slight decrease of 2.2% quarter-on-quarter but an increase of 5.4% year-on-year [1]. - The company reported a gross margin of 14.5% for Q3 2025, up 6.4 percentage points year-on-year, while the net profit was 150 million yuan, a significant improvement compared to the previous year [2][3]. Cost and Expenses - The report indicates that the sales, administrative, and R&D expense ratios for Q3 2025 were 4.9%, 3.2%, and 6.2%, respectively, with a mixed trend in expenses. Although the expense ratios showed some improvement, total expenses continued to rise, particularly in R&D [2]. Future Outlook - The company is projected to maintain strong sales momentum into Q4 2025, with expectations of continued growth in monthly sales. The report anticipates that 2026 will be a significant year for new car launches, with several models expected to perform well in the market [2][4]. - The long-term strategy of self-research and self-supply is expected to continue to yield cost advantages, enhancing the company's competitive position in the market [4].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for the company, indicating an expected price increase of over 15% in the next 6-12 months [10]. Core Insights - The company's Q3 performance is robust, with new car sales reaching 761,000 units, representing a year-on-year increase of 42.5% and a quarter-on-quarter increase of 8.1%. Total revenue for Q3 is 89.19 billion yuan, up 47.7% year-on-year and 14.7% quarter-on-quarter [1]. - The company has shown a strong ability to improve its product mix, driven by the growth in the new energy vehicle segment and a recovery in exports. However, the gross margin has slightly declined due to the increased proportion of new energy vehicles, which typically have lower margins compared to traditional fuel vehicles [2]. - The company is expected to maintain strong operational performance in Q4, with continued growth in the new energy segment and stable performance in traditional business lines [2][3]. Summary by Sections Financial Performance - In Q3, the company achieved a gross margin of 16.6%, with a year-on-year increase of 1.0 percentage points. The actual net profit attributable to the parent company for Q2 was 3.96 billion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 61.3% [1]. - For the first three quarters of 2025, the company sold 2.169 million new cars, a year-on-year increase of 45.6%, with total revenue of 239.48 billion yuan, up 26.4% year-on-year [1]. Cost and Expenses - The company’s sales, administrative, and R&D expense ratios for Q2 were 6.0%, 1.5%, and 4.9%, respectively, showing a slight decrease from the previous quarter [1]. - The report highlights that the company has maintained a stable expense structure, with expense ratios decreasing quarter-on-quarter [2]. Future Outlook - The company is expected to continue its upward trajectory, with new models like the Zeekr 9X and Galaxy M9 set to enhance the product lineup and improve profitability [2][4]. - The report projects net profits for 2025, 2026, and 2027 to be 16.6 billion, 19.68 billion, and 24 billion yuan, respectively, corresponding to PE ratios of 10.45, 8.81, and 7.24 [4].

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core View of the Report From November 10 - 14, bond - type ETFs had a net capital outflow of 550 million yuan. Credit - bond ETFs, interest - rate bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs had net outflows of 370 million yuan, net inflows of 1.21 billion yuan, and net outflows of 1.39 billion yuan respectively. In terms of performance, compared with the previous week, the weekly cumulative unit - net - value changes of credit - bond ETFs, interest - rate bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs were - 0.01%, + 0.06%, and + 0.43% respectively, with the net value of convertible - bond ETFs continuously recovering [2][13]. Summary by Directory 1. Issuance Progress Tracking - Last week, there were no newly issued bond ETFs [3][17]. - A list of bond ETFs issued this year was provided, including details such as fund names, issuance shares, issuance scales, issuance announcement dates, fund establishment dates, and performance comparison benchmarks [18]. 2. Existing Product Tracking - As of November 14, 2025, the circulating market values of interest - rate bond ETFs, credit - bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs were 146.9 billion yuan, 376.9 billion yuan, and 65.7 billion yuan respectively, with credit - bond ETFs accounting for 63.9% of the total scale. Haifutong CSI Short - term Financing ETF and Boshi Convertible - bond ETF had the top two circulating market values [19]. - Compared with the previous week, the circulating market values of interest - rate bond ETFs, credit - bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs increased by 1.35 billion yuan, decreased by 130 million yuan, and decreased by 980 million yuan respectively. Products with obvious scale growth last week included Pengyang ChinaBond - 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF and Haifutong CSI Short - term Financing ETF [21]. - Among credit - bond ETFs, the circulating market values of benchmark - market - making credit - bond ETFs and science - innovation bond ETFs were 120 billion yuan and 251.7 billion yuan respectively, decreasing by 1.58 billion yuan and 70 million yuan compared with the previous week [23]. 3. ETF Performance Tracking - Based on the average trends of the cumulative unit net values of 16 interest - rate bond ETFs and 35 credit - bond ETFs, the cumulative unit net values of interest - rate bond ETFs and credit - bond ETFs closed at 1.19 and 1.03 respectively [26]. - As of November 14, taking February 7 as the base date, the average cumulative return of benchmark - market - making credit - bond ETFs rose to 0.81%; taking July 17 as the base date, the cumulative return of science - innovation bond ETFs marginally recovered to 0.09% [5][30]. 4. Premium/Discount Rate Tracking - The average premium/discount rates of credit - bond ETFs, interest - rate bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs last week were - 0.18%, + 0.01%, and - 0.04% respectively. The average trading price of credit - bond ETFs was lower than the fund's unit net value, indicating low allocation sentiment. Specifically, the weekly average premium/discount rates of benchmark - market - making credit - bond ETFs and science - innovation bond ETFs were - 0.30% and - 0.16% respectively [6][36]. 5. Turnover Rate Tracking - Last week, the turnover rates of interest - rate bond ETFs > credit - bond ETFs > convertible - bond ETFs. The weekly turnover rates of all three types of products declined, falling to 125%, 121%, and 87% respectively. Specifically, products such as Haifutong Shanghai Stock Exchange 5 - year Local Government Bond ETF, Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark - Market - Making Treasury Bond ETF, and Guotai CSI AAA Science - Innovation Corporate Bond ETF had relatively high turnover rates [7][41]. - A detailed list of 53 bond ETFs' existing details and weekly performance was provided, including circulating market values, weekly changes, weekly net - value changes, cumulative returns this year, weekly average premium/discount rates, and weekly turnover rates [45].

- The report tracks the performance of enhanced index funds, highlighting the best-performing funds across different indices such as CSI 500, CSI 1000, and CSI 2000. For example, the Ping An CSI 500 Enhanced Index Fund achieved an excess return of 2.03% last week, while the Taiping CSI 1000 Enhanced Index Fund recorded an excess return of 1.84%[5][38][41] - Over the past year, the best-performing enhanced index funds include the E Fund CSI 300 Enhanced Fund with a 12.83% excess return, the Penghua CSI 500 Enhanced Fund with an 18.90% excess return, and the Huaxia CSI 1000 Enhanced Fund with a 28.67% excess return[39][42] - The report also provides detailed performance metrics for various enhanced strategy ETFs, such as the China Merchants CSI 2000 Enhanced Strategy ETF, which achieved a 31.60% excess return over the past year and 22.17% since 2025[27][28][39]

Core Viewpoints - The issuance of new convertible bonds has been relatively low this year, with less than 50 bonds issued and a total scale of less than 500 billion, leading to a scarcity that has attracted market attention [12][14] - New bonds listed since July have closed above 140, indicating strong market demand, and the pricing strategy for new bonds is crucial for obtaining returns [2][12] - Two main strategies for institutions to gain returns from new bonds include buying on the second day after listing and participating in rights offerings [2][27] Market Review - The stock market has been experiencing fluctuations, with the Shanghai Composite Index and ChiNext Index showing declines of 0.18% and 3.01% respectively, indicating a technical pressure around the 4000-point mark [34] - The consumer sector has shown strength, while technology stocks have faced significant pullbacks, influenced by CPI/PPI data and external market conditions [34][55] - The convertible bond market has seen a rise in the index, with the average transaction volume increasing, reflecting a high valuation environment [44][47] Convertible Bond Investment Strategy - The current valuation of convertible bonds is at a high level, with the average premium rate for bonds priced between 90-110 at approximately 30.06%, indicating limited upward momentum [47][55] - A neutral overall view is suggested, with a focus on trading opportunities as the premium rate approaches around 26% [55] - Specific sectors to watch include high-growth areas such as non-ferrous metals, electronics, battery storage, and military industries, as well as themes like AI computing and solid-state batteries [55] Primary Market Tracking - Recently, one new bond was issued, and several companies have received approvals for bond issuance, indicating ongoing activity in the convertible bond market [56][58]