——2026 年 1 月信用利差月报 作者 分析师 姚宇彤 2026 年 2 月 9 日 关注东方金诚公众号 获取更多研究报告 配置盘支撑下，1 月信用利差全线收窄 2026 年 1 月，债市整体偏强震荡：年初至中旬股市和商品市场表现强劲， 对债市形成压制；下旬，受获利盘出逃、融资保证金升高等因素影响，权益 市场情绪降温，加之公募基金费率新规正式稿温和落地，缓解债基赎回担忧， 以及央行结构性货币政策工具降息、配置型机构大力买入等因素支撑，债市 呈现修复行情。由于信用债相对利率债更具票息优势，银行、保险"开门红" 增加信用债配置需求，以及摊余债基集中开放期投资偏好转向信用债，1 月 信用债表现好于利率债，信用利差全线收窄。 核心观点 ·· 时间 东方金诚 研究发展部 部门执行总监 于丽峰 部门执行总监 冯琳 1 月，债券市场整体偏强震荡，在信用债相对利率债更具票息 优势，银行、保险"开门红"增加信用债配置需求，以及摊 余债基集中开放期投资偏好转向信用债等因素带动下，信用 债表现好于利率债，信用利差全线收窄。目前，短久期信用 债利差普遍已压缩至历史低位，中长久期部分品种仍有一定 的利差空间，且考虑到摊余债基开放对 ...

固定收益周报 成交规模微增，信用利差多数收窄 ――信用债周报 分析师：李济安 SAC NO：S1150522060001 2026 年 2 月 24 日 核心观点： 城投债方面，坚持统筹发展和安全的原则下，城投违约的可能性很低， 城投债仍可作为信用债重点配置品种。有力有序有效推进地方融资平台出清 的严监管下，融资平台改革转型加快推进，关注"实体类"融资平台改革转 型的机会。 本期（2 月 9 日至 2 月 15 日）交易商协会公布的发行指导利率多数下行， 整体变化幅度为-4 BP 至 0 BP。本期信用债发行规模环比下降，企业债保持 零发行，其余品种发行金额减少；信用债净融资额环比减少，企业债净融资 额增加，其余品种净融资额减少，企业债、短期融资券净融资额为负，其余 品种净融资额为正。二级市场方面，本期信用债成交金额环比微增，企业债、 中期票据成交金额增加，公司债、短期融资券、定向工具成交金额减少。收 益率方面，本期信用债收益率多数下行。信用利差方面，本期多数品种信用 利差收窄。分位数来看，多数品种利差均处于历史低位，7 年期品种分位数 相对较高。绝对收益角度来看，相对旺盛的配置需求将推动信用债延续修复 行情 ...

1. Report's Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In 2025, the central bank implemented a moderately loose monetary policy, keeping liquidity abundant. The yields of interest - rate bonds showed an overall fluctuating upward trend, while the issuance rates of credit bonds decreased. The total issuance of interest - rate and credit bonds increased steadily year - on - year. Credit risks were converging. Looking forward to 2026, bond market yields are expected to remain volatile at low levels, credit spreads may show structural differentiation, the bond market issuance scale is expected to grow steadily, and bond market credit risks will continue to converge with the default rate possibly at a historical low [2]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Bond Market Overall Situation - In 2025, China's bond market issued a total of 88.52 trillion yuan of various bonds, a year - on - year increase of 12.35%. Excluding inter - bank certificates of deposit, the total issuance of various bonds was 54.70 trillion yuan, a year - on - year increase of 15.40%. By the end of 2025, the stock of various bonds in China reached 196.17 trillion yuan, a growth of 11.45% compared with the end of 2024 [4]. 3.1.1 Interest - rate Bonds - **Yield Trend**: The yield of China's treasury bonds showed an overall fluctuating upward trend in 2025. The 10 - year treasury bond yield fluctuated in five different stages throughout the year, affected by factors such as economic data, policy expectations, and market sentiment [5]. - **Issuance Scale**: The bond market issued 32.39 trillion yuan of interest - rate bonds in 2025, a year - on - year increase of 20.63%. The issuance scale of each type of bond increased. By the end of 2025, the stock of interest - rate bond varieties in China's bond market was 123.51 trillion yuan, a growth of 14.75% compared with the previous year - end [8][9]. 3.1.2 Credit Bonds - **Issuance Interest Rate**: In 2025, the issuance rates of major credit bonds showed a downward trend. Taking the credit bonds issued by AAA - rated entities as an example, the average issuance rates of major bond types with various maturities decreased [10]. - **Issuance Volume**: The issuance scale of credit bonds reached 22.06 trillion yuan in 2025, a year - on - year increase of 8.14%. By the end of 2025, the stock of credit bonds was 51.35 trillion yuan, a year - on - year increase of 8.61%. Different sub - categories of credit bonds had different issuance trends [13]. - **Non - financial Enterprise Bonds**: In 2025, non - financial enterprises issued 15,790 issues of bonds with a total issuance scale of 13.94 trillion yuan. The issuance period and scale increased by 2.87% and 1.70% year - on - year respectively. By the end of 2025, the stock of non - financial enterprise bonds was 31.29 trillion yuan, a growth of 10.00% compared with the previous year - end [14]. - **Non - policy Financial Bonds**: Financial institutions issued 1,488 issues of non - policy financial bonds in 2025, with a total issuance scale of 5.66 trillion yuan. The issuance period and scale increased by 34.54% and 24.74% year - on - year respectively. By the end of 2025, the stock of non - policy financial bonds was 15.66 trillion yuan, a growth of 11.35% compared with the previous year - end [18]. - **Asset - backed Securities**: In 2025, the issuance period, number, and scale of asset - backed securities all increased by about 15%. By the end of 2025, the stock of asset - backed securities was 3.61 trillion yuan, an increase of 9.16% compared with the previous year - end [22]. - **Other Credit Bonds**: In 2025, the issuance period and scale of other credit bonds increased year - on - year. By the end of 2025, the stock of other credit bonds was 1.07 trillion yuan, a decrease of 14.81% compared with the previous year - end [24]. 3.2 Bond Market Operation Characteristics - **Issuance of Urban Investment Bonds and Industrial Bonds**: In 2025, the issuance of urban investment bonds decreased, while the issuance of industrial bonds increased. The net financing of urban investment bonds decreased, and that of industrial bonds increased [27]. - **Rating and Credit - grade Distribution**: The proportion of bonds without debt ratings continued to increase, and the proportion of bonds issued by AAA - rated entities continued to rise. The credit grades of non - financial enterprise credit bond issuers were mainly distributed between AAA and AA [29][34]. - **Enterprise Nature of Issuers**: In 2025, state - owned enterprises were still the main issuers of non - financial enterprise bonds. The proportion of bonds issued by central state - owned enterprises and private enterprises increased, while that of local state - owned enterprises decreased [36]. - **Regional and Industry Differentiation**: The regions and industries involved in non - financial enterprise bond issuers remained differentiated. In terms of regions, the issuance scale of non - financial enterprise bonds in some regions increased, while in some others it decreased. In terms of industries, the issuance scale of some industries increased, while in some others it decreased [41]. - **Innovative Bond Issuance**: In 2025, the issuance of innovative bonds maintained a good momentum. The issuance period and scale of science and technology innovation bonds increased by about 80%, and the issuance of other innovative bonds also increased significantly [43]. - **Credit Risk Convergence**: In 2025, the number of new default issuers, the number of defaulted bonds, and the default amount in China's bond market all decreased year - on - year. The number of new extended - maturity issuers decreased, but the number of extended - maturity bonds and the extended - maturity scale increased. Overall, the bond market credit risk showed a converging trend [47]. 3.3 Bond Market Outlook - **Yield and Credit Spread**: Interest - rate bond yields are expected to remain volatile at low levels, with limited upside and downside space. Credit bond yields are expected to follow interest - rate bonds and maintain a low - level volatile trend. Credit spreads are expected to remain low, but market disturbances may increase [48][49]. - **Issuance Scale**: In 2026, the issuance scale of interest - rate bonds is expected to increase due to a more active fiscal policy. The issuance scale of financial institution bonds in the credit bond market is expected to grow steadily, while the issuance of urban investment bonds may shrink slightly, and the issuance of industrial bonds is expected to grow continuously [50]. - **Credit Risk**: In 2026, the bond market credit risk is expected to continue to converge, and the default rate may be at a historical low. Different types of bonds, such as urban investment bonds, real estate enterprise bonds, financial bonds, and convertible bonds, have different credit risk characteristics and need to be monitored [51][52].

Key Points - The report indicates that there is still potential for credit spread compression, particularly in the context of different bond types and their excess spreads compared to similar maturity and rating bonds [1][3][35] - As of January 30, 2026, the excess spreads for 3Y AAA-rated bank subordinated bonds, perpetual bonds, and industrial bonds are 6.1BP, 6.6BP, and 11.0BP, respectively, which are at the 92%, 79%, and 44% percentiles since early 2025 [1][3][35] - The report suggests that the selection of bonds based on value for money ranks as follows: bank subordinated bonds > perpetual bonds > urban investment bonds > industrial bonds [1][35] Credit Strategy Review for January 2026 - The yield of bank subordinated bonds has significantly decreased, and the excess spreads remain high, indicating potential for further compression [3][6] - The report notes that the 3Y AA+ urban investment bond yield decreased by 9BP, with the yield at the end of January 2026 being 1.91% [11] - Factors contributing to the decline in credit bond yields include limited corporate financing demand, stable credit issuance, and a loose funding environment [11][14] Performance of Different Credit Strategies - In January 2026, the performance of various credit strategies ranked as follows: duration extension > barbell strategy > 3Y bullet strategy > short-end sinking [15] - The returns for the duration extension strategy for urban investment bonds, industrial bonds, bank subordinated bonds, and perpetual bonds were 0.65%, 0.85%, 0.76%, and 0.82%, respectively [15][18] - The report highlights that the short-end sinking strategy yielded returns of 0.16%-0.19% across different bond types, although its performance was generally average [17][18] Outlook for February 2026 - The report anticipates that the overall funding environment will remain tight, with a weak recovery in the fundamentals [35] - It is expected that the central bank's operations will lead to a decrease in funding rates, potentially resulting in a further decline in long-term bond yields by 5-10BP in Q1 2026 [35] - The report emphasizes that the credit spread compression trend is likely to continue, with a focus on the performance of various bond types [35]

Core Insights - Bloomberg is the first global index provider to include Chinese bonds in mainstream global indices, offering a unique perspective on the Chinese bond market through its flagship Bloomberg China Fixed Income Index [3] - The January report indicates a positive return of 0.37% for the Bloomberg China Aggregate Index, with a decrease in 30-day volatility [5] - The Bloomberg China High Liquidity Credit (LCC) Index recorded a return of 0.23%, while the Kungfu Bond Index (USD-denominated Chinese credit bonds) achieved a return of 0.41% in January [5] Index Performance Summary - The Bloomberg China Aggregate Index (I08271CN) had a year-to-date return of 0.37% with an index level of 245.33 [7] - The 10+ Year Treasury Index (I08283CN) recorded a return of 0.41% with an index level of 325.69, while the 1-3 Year Index (I08279CN) had a return of 0.19% with an index level of 213.95 [7] - The China USD Credit (Kungfu) Index (I29380US) achieved a return of 0.41% with an index level of 204.21 [7] Market Outlook - The 10-year government bond yield in China is expected to test the 2% mark in 2026, driven by factors such as the issuance of long-term special government bonds and optimistic expectations regarding re-inflation under the government's "anti-involution" policy [9] - The credit spread of the Asian emerging market high-yield dollar bond index narrowed by approximately 40 basis points to 318 basis points in the first two weeks of 2026, reflecting typical early-year optimism [9]

Core Viewpoint - The bond market has shown signs of recovery over the past month, with various fixed-income products achieving positive returns, particularly those with embedded options, while the stock market remains volatile and weak [2][3][9]. Group 1: Fixed Income Product Performance - In the past month, all types of fixed-income products have generated positive returns, with option-embedded bond funds leading at 0.74%, followed by medium to long-term bond funds at 0.37%, short bond funds at 0.20%, high-grade interbank certificates of deposit at 0.15%, and cash management products at 0.10% [3][9]. - The recovery in the bond market is attributed to increased demand for safe-haven assets due to stock and commodity market volatility, as well as a more favorable liquidity environment [9][19]. Group 2: Market Review - The bond market has experienced a recovery, with interest rates declining, supported by factors such as increased investor demand for bonds during the holiday season and a more abundant liquidity environment [9][19]. - The 10-year government bond yield has dropped below the critical level of 1.8%, but further downward movement is expected to be limited in the short term [9][22]. Group 3: Future Outlook - In the short term, the bond market's recovery may be nearing its end, with potential upward pressure on interest rates due to various factors, including stock market performance and inflation expectations [22][28]. - The strategy for investors includes maintaining positions in short to medium-term pure bond products while waiting for better entry points for long-duration bonds as yields rise [34][35]. Group 4: Credit Bond Market - The credit bond market is expected to remain stable, with limited risks of widening credit spreads, and short to medium-duration products are favored [23][34]. - Investors are advised to continue holding medium to short-duration products to capture coupon payments, while being cautious with long-duration credit bonds due to increased volatility [23][34]. Group 5: Regulatory Updates - On January 23, the China Securities Regulatory Commission released guidelines for the performance comparison benchmarks of publicly offered securities investment funds, which aim to simplify compliance requirements and enhance transparency in the fixed-income market [29][30].

Group 1 - The bond market is experiencing a bullish trend supported by ample liquidity and institutional demand, with yields dropping below the critical 1.8% level as investors prefer bonds over other assets ahead of the holiday [1][3] - Major banks have become the primary buyers in the bond market, driven by a "deposit-loan mismatch" phenomenon, which has led to increased bond allocations since December [2][6] - The central bank's recent actions, including a net injection of 448 billion yuan into the market, have contributed to a favorable environment for bonds, with interbank liquidity remaining abundant [3][6] Group 2 - As of February 12, 2026, the yield on the 10-year government bond has decreased to around 1.77%, reflecting a broader trend of declining yields across various maturities [3][4] - A significant majority of bond funds have delivered positive returns since the beginning of 2026, with 3523 out of 3574 medium to long-term pure bond funds achieving positive returns [4][5] - The current market sentiment is optimistic, with expectations for a relatively mild bond market environment in 2026, as banks are likely to continue favoring long-term bonds due to improved cost structures and ample liquidity [7][8]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - During the period from February 2nd to February 8th, most of the issuance guidance rates announced by the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors increased, with an overall change range of -1 BP to 4 BP. The issuance scale of credit bonds increased month - on - month, corporate bonds remained at zero issuance, the issuance amounts of corporate bonds, medium - term notes, and private placement notes increased, while the issuance amount of commercial paper decreased. The net financing amount of credit bonds increased month - on - month, the net financing amount of commercial paper decreased, the net financing amounts of other varieties increased, and the net financing amount of corporate bonds was negative [1][60]. - In the secondary market, the trading volume of credit bonds continued to decline month - on - month. The trading volume of private placement notes increased, while the trading volumes of other varieties decreased. Most of the yields of credit bonds declined, and most of the credit spreads widened. In terms of quantiles, most of the spreads were at historical lows, and the quantiles of 7 - year varieties were relatively high [1][60]. - From an absolute return perspective, the relatively strong allocation demand will drive the credit bond market to continue its recovery. Although fluctuations and adjustments are inevitable under the influence of both positive and negative factors, the conditions for a comprehensive bear market in credit bonds are still insufficient. In the long run, the yields are still on a downward path, and the idea of increasing allocation during adjustments is still feasible. From a relative return perspective, the compression space of credit spreads at all tenors is insufficient at present, and the cost - effectiveness of most varieties for allocation is not high. The coupon strategy should be cautious in the current allocation thinking, and the trading thinking should be moderately optimistic. The key to bond selection is to keep an eye on the changing trend of interest - rate bonds and pay attention to the coupon value of individual bonds [1][60]. - The central and local governments continue to actively optimize real - estate policies, which have played a positive role in promoting the stabilization of the real - estate market. Although the real - estate market is still in the transition period between old and new models, it is moving towards stabilization. The subsequent policy rhythm and intensity are worth looking forward to. For real - estate bonds, investors with high risk appetite can consider early layout, focusing on enterprises with outstanding new financing and sales recovery, and balancing risks and returns. The focus of allocation is still on central and state - owned enterprises with stable historical valuations and excellent performance, as well as high - quality private enterprise bonds with strong guarantees. They can also appropriately bet on the trading opportunities brought by the valuation repair of bonds of over - sold real - estate enterprises [2][63]. - For urban investment bonds, under the principle of coordinating development and security, the probability of default is very low, and they can still be a key allocation variety for credit bonds. Under the strict supervision of the clearance of local financing platforms, the reform and transformation of financing platforms are accelerating. Opportunities for the reform and transformation of "entity - type" financing platforms can be concerned. With a coupon - oriented approach, appropriate positive actions can be taken. The allocation strategy can give priority to short - to medium - term credit sinking, and the trading strategy can still choose to extend the duration of medium - to high - grade bonds [3][63]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Primary Market Situation 3.1.1 Issuance and Maturity Scale - From February 2nd to February 8th, a total of 440 credit bonds were issued, with an issuance amount of 356.856 billion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 15.70%. The net financing amount of credit bonds was 255.063 billion yuan, an increase of 95.222 billion yuan month - on - month [12]. - By variety, corporate bonds had zero issuance with a net financing amount of - 1.818 billion yuan; corporate bonds issued 190 with an issuance amount of 144.4 billion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 57.73%, and a net financing amount of 122.621 billion yuan; medium - term notes issued 126 with an issuance amount of 110.337 billion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 32.30%, and a net financing amount of 87.862 billion yuan; commercial paper issued 90 with an issuance amount of 81.706 billion yuan, a month - on - month decrease of 31.91%, and a net financing amount of 35.325 billion yuan; private placement notes issued 34 with an issuance amount of 20.413 billion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 51.26%, and a net financing amount of 11.073 billion yuan [13]. 3.1.2 Issuance Interest Rates - Most of the issuance guidance rates announced by the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors increased, with an overall change range of -1 BP to 4 BP. By tenor, the interest rate change range of 1 - year varieties was 0 BP to 3 BP, 3 - year varieties was -1 BP to 3 BP, 5 - year varieties was -1 BP to 4 BP, and 7 - year varieties was -1 BP to 4 BP. By rating, the interest rate change range of key AAA - rated and AAA - rated varieties was -1 BP to 1 BP, AA + - rated varieties was -1 BP to 2 BP, AA - rated varieties was 3 BP to 4 BP, and AA - - rated varieties was 3 BP to 4 BP [14]. 3.2 Secondary Market Situation 3.2.1 Market Trading Volume - From February 2nd to February 8th, the total trading volume of credit bonds was 871.756 billion yuan, a month - on - month decrease of 6.58%. The trading volumes of corporate bonds, corporate bonds, medium - term notes, commercial paper, and private placement notes were 15.904 billion yuan, 354.344 billion yuan, 312.069 billion yuan, 131.161 billion yuan, and 58.278 billion yuan respectively. The trading volume of credit bonds continued to decline month - on - month, the trading volume of private placement notes increased, while the trading volumes of other varieties decreased [17]. 3.2.2 Credit Spreads - For medium - and short - term notes, all varieties' credit spreads widened. For enterprise bonds, most varieties' credit spreads widened, with the spreads of 1 - year AA - rated and AA - - rated, and 3 - year AA - - rated varieties narrowing. For urban investment bonds, most varieties' credit spreads widened, with the spreads of 3 - year AA - - rated, 5 - year AA - rated and AA - - rated varieties narrowing [20][29][37]. 3.2.3 Term Spreads and Rating Spreads - For AA + medium - and short - term notes, the 3Y - 1Y term spread narrowed by 2.69 BP, the 5Y - 3Y spread widened by 1.32 BP, and the 7Y - 3Y spread widened by 1.60 BP. In terms of rating spreads, the 3 - year (AA - )-(AAA) spread remained unchanged, the (AA)-(AAA) spread narrowed by 1.00 BP, and the (AA + )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 1.00 BP [45]. - For AA + enterprise bonds, the 3Y - 1Y term spread widened by 0.84 BP, the 5Y - 3Y spread narrowed by 1.00 BP, and the 7Y - 3Y spread narrowed by 0.73 BP. In terms of rating spreads, the 3 - year (AA - )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 4.00 BP, the (AA)-(AAA) spread narrowed by 1.00 BP, and the (AA + )-(AAA) spread remained unchanged [49]. - For AA + urban investment bonds, the 3Y - 1Y term spread narrowed by 0.83 BP, the 5Y - 3Y spread widened by 0.70 BP, and the 7Y - 3Y spread narrowed by 1.34 BP. In terms of rating spreads, the 3 - year (AA - )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 3.21 BP, the (AA)-(AAA) spread narrowed by 2.01 BP, and the (AA + )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 1.01 BP [52]. 3.3 Credit Rating Adjustment and Default Bond Statistics 3.3.1 Credit Rating Adjustment Statistics - According to iFinD statistics, there were no company rating (including outlook) adjustments during the period from February 2nd to February 8th [57]. 3.3.2 Default and Extended - Maturity Bond Statistics - According to iFinD statistics, there were no defaults or extended - maturity of credit bonds issued by any issuer during the period from February 2nd to February 8th [58]. 3.4 Investment Views - The same as the core views mentioned above, including the analysis of credit bonds, real - estate bonds, and urban investment bonds [1][2][3].

Economic Data and Events - The US manufacturing and services PMI, as well as consumer confidence, exceeded expectations, while employment data was significantly weaker than anticipated [2][14] - In the Eurozone, January manufacturing PMI showed a greater rebound than the initial value, but services PMI and retail sales fell short of expectations; inflation met expectations and remained stable compared to the previous value [2][14] - Japan's manufacturing and services PMI both improved in January [2][14] Upcoming Economic Data and Events - Key focus on the US non-farm payroll report for January to be released on February 11 and the US CPI data for January to be released on February 13 [3][16] Weekly Economic Activity Index - The US economic activity index remained stable, with the WEI index at 2.13% for the week ending January 31, down from 2.49% the previous week [4][18] - Germany's economic activity index returned to positive territory, with the WAI index at 0.1% for the week ending February 1, compared to -0.01% the previous week [5][18] Demand - US Redbook commercial retail year-on-year growth rate showed fluctuations, with a reading of 6.7% for the week ending January 30, down from 7.1% the previous week [6][21] - The US mortgage rate stabilized, with the 30-year mortgage rate at 6.11% on February 5, slightly up from 6.10% the previous week; mortgage applications fell, with the MBA market composite index at 330.8, down 8.9% week-on-week [6][24] Employment - Initial jobless claims rose to 231,000 for the week ending January 31, up from 209,000 the previous week; continuing claims increased from 1.819 million to 1.844 million for the week ending January 24 [7][27] - The number of job vacancies remained stable, with the Indeed job vacancy index at 103.9 as of January 30, slightly lower than the December average of 104.2 [8][29] Prices - Commodity prices experienced a significant pullback, with the RJ/CRB commodity price index down 3.3% week-on-week as of February 6 [9][34] - US gasoline prices stabilized at $2.75 per gallon for the week ending February 2, showing no change from the previous week [9][36] Financial Conditions - Financial conditions in the US and Europe showed signs of recovery, with the Bloomberg financial conditions index for the US at 0.755 on February 6, up from 0.539 the previous day [10][39] - Offshore dollar liquidity remained stable, with narrow fluctuations in swap basis [11][41] - High-yield dollar bond spreads widened but showed signs of recent recovery, with the spread-to-worst for JPMorgan's global BB-B rated dollar bonds at 256.3 basis points [11][43] - The yield spread between US and Japanese bonds narrowed, while the spread between Italian and German bonds widened [11][46] Fiscal Data - As of February 5, cumulative federal funding expenditures in the US increased by 3.8% year-on-year, totaling approximately $784.5 billion [12][49][52]

Group 1: Fund Overview - As of the end of 2025, there are 255 amortized cost bond funds with a total net asset value of approximately CNY 2.04 trillion, an increase of about CNY 612 billion from Q3 2025[4] - The total asset value of these funds is around CNY 2.78 trillion[4] - The average duration of bonds held by these funds is typically less than their closed period, which ranges from 3 to over 5 years[4] Group 2: Credit Bond Allocation - By the end of 2025, the allocation to credit bonds in amortized cost bond funds significantly increased, with non-financial credit bonds rising from 1% to 24%[17] - The market value of policy financial bonds decreased from 74% to 54% of the total allocation[17] - The core allocation among non-financial credit bonds is mid-term notes, which account for 14% of the total bond investment, with a market value of CNY 3,755.77 billion, an increase of CNY 3,675.85 billion from 2024[17] Group 3: Future Expectations - In Q1 2026, the cumulative opening scale of amortized cost bond funds is expected to reach approximately CNY 3,739.7 billion, with a peak in openings anticipated[10] - The ongoing opening of these funds is expected to provide continuous incremental demand for the credit bond market, potentially leading to differentiated performance among various credit bond types[4] - The strategy should focus on 3-5 year high-grade credit bonds, particularly those rated AA+ and above, to capitalize on the upcoming market opportunities[27]