Group 1: Market Performance - In January, the Wind All A index rose significantly with a monthly increase of 5.83% and an average daily trading volume of 3.05 trillion yuan, although it fell by 1.59% in the last week [3] - The CSI 1000 index increased by 8.68%, the CSI 500 by 12.12%, the CSI 300 by 1.65%, and the SSE 50 by 1.17%, driven mainly by the electronics and non-ferrous metals sectors, while the banking sector dragged down the overall index [3] - Domestic investor sentiment was high, with a monthly increase in financing balance of 197.1 billion yuan, while the issuance of stock funds decreased to 20 billion yuan, but mixed funds surged to 46.9 billion yuan, significantly above the monthly average of 13.4 billion yuan in 2025 [3][4] Group 2: Policy Expectations - The current valuation levels of A-share hot topics are high, with the dynamic PE of the CSI 500 index exceeding two standard deviations above the past five years [4] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission emphasized the need for a stable market, discouraging excessive speculation and market manipulation, indicating a preference for a "slow bull" market rather than a "crazy bull" [4][5] - The Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges have introduced measures to increase the minimum margin ratio for financing purchases of stocks [4] Group 3: Bond Market Dynamics - In January, the bond market experienced a decline followed by a recovery, with the People's Bank of China (PBOC) significantly increasing the net injection of Medium-term Lending Facility (MLF) [6][7] - As of January 30, the yields for 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 30-year government bonds were 1.38%, 1.58%, 1.81%, and 2.29% respectively, with varying changes from the previous month [6] - The issuance of government bonds in January was 2.08 trillion yuan, with a net issuance of 1.181 trillion yuan, including 426.7 billion yuan of central government bonds and 754.3 billion yuan of local government bonds [8] Group 4: Manufacturing and Economic Indicators - The official manufacturing PMI for January was 49.3, below the expected 50.1, indicating a contraction in the manufacturing sector [9][10] - The decline in PMI is attributed to seasonal factors and insufficient market demand, with labor-intensive industries experiencing a drop in exports and early returns of workers for the Spring Festival [10] - The price indices for raw materials and factory output both increased, with the purchasing price index at 56.1 and the factory price index at 50.6, indicating potential pressure on corporate profits [11][12] Group 5: Precious Metals Market - In January, gold prices rose by 13.01% to 4,880.034 USD/oz, while silver surged by 19.12% to 85.259 USD/oz, with both metals experiencing extreme volatility [25][26] - The market dynamics were influenced by geopolitical tensions, concerns over the US dollar's credibility, and expectations of continued loose monetary policy from the Federal Reserve [25][26] - The sharp adjustment on January 30 was seen as a forced liquidation of overbought positions, but the long-term drivers for precious metals remain intact [26][27]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided 2. Core Views of the Report - The bond market has long - term allocation value, and there is still room for reserve requirement ratio cuts in 2026. The 10 - year Treasury bond yield of 1.83% has long - term investment value, though it may fluctuate in the short term due to high investor risk preference [12] - For A - shares, investors can follow the trend and focus on opportunities in four directions: satellite, commercial aerospace, and military industries; technology sectors like artificial intelligence, chips, etc.; bulk resource products such as non - ferrous metals, gold, and rare earths; and oil, gas, chemical, and petrochemical industries [13] - The US dollar may face continued depreciation pressure during the Fed's interest - rate cut cycle. The euro, pound, and yen will appreciate against the US dollar, while the RMB's appreciation against the US dollar may be relatively lower. Bulk commodities like gold, silver, copper, and oil may continue to rise in price [14] 3. Summary by Related Contents Stock Market Performance - US stock market: The three major US stock indexes declined. From 20260119 - 20260125, the Nasdaq, S&P 500, and Dow Jones Industrial Average changed by - 0.06%, - 0.35%, and - 0.53% respectively. The Hang Seng Index also declined by 0.36% during the same period [4] - A - share market: The large - cap stocks in A - shares declined while small - cap stocks rose, and most growth sectors increased. From 20260119 - 20260125, the Wind All - A Index changed by 1.81%. The CSI A100, CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, CSI 2000, and Wind Micro - cap stocks changed by - 0.69%, - 0.62%, 4.34%, 2.89%, 4.04%, and 5.16% respectively. In terms of sector styles, blue - chip stocks in the Shanghai Stock Exchange declined while growth stocks rose; in the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, both blue - chip and growth stocks declined; the Beixin 50 Index increased by 2.60%. Among the 30 CITIC industries, 24 industries rose and 6 declined. Leading industries with a weekly increase of more than 5.0% included building materials, petroleum and petrochemicals, steel, non - ferrous metals, basic chemicals, and real estate. Gold, photovoltaic, building materials, satellite, petrochemical, and aerospace ETFs led with a weekly increase of over 5% [5][6] Bond Market Performance - Chinese bonds: The yields of medium - and long - term Treasury bonds in China declined in the past week. From 20260119 - 20260125, the 10 - year Treasury bond futures main contract rose by 0.12% compared to January 16, 2026. The yield of the 10 - year active Treasury bond declined by 1.26 BP to 1.8298% compared to January 16, 2026. Yields of bonds with a maturity of 3 years and above declined [7] - US bonds: US bond yields showed mixed performance. As of January 23, 2026, the 10 - year US bond yield remained unchanged at 4.24% compared to January 16, 2026. Yields of various maturities showed mixed performance from 20260119 - 20260125 [8] Exchange Rate and Commodity Performance - Exchange rates: The US dollar depreciated. From 20260119 - 20260125, the US dollar index declined by 1.88%. The US dollar against the euro, pound, and yen changed by - 1.87%, - 1.89%, and - 1.43% respectively. The US dollar against the offshore RMB exchange rate declined by 0.27% to 6.9487 as of January 23, 2026, and the US dollar against the on - shore RMB exchange rate declined by 0.07% to 6.9642 [9][10] - Commodities: Gold prices rose. From 20260119 - 20260125, the London gold spot price rose by 7.27% to $4946.25 per ounce; the COMEX gold futures price rose by 7.00% to $4936.00 per ounce. The domestic Shanghai gold spot price rose by 7.52% to 1110.3 yuan per gram, and the futures price rose by 7.71% to 1111.88 yuan per gram [11]

行业 国债日报 日期 2026 年 1 月 30 日 研究员：何卓乔(宏观贵金属) 18665641296 hezhuoqiao@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3008762 研究员：黄雯昕(国债集运) 021-60635739 huangwenxin@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3051589 研究员：聂嘉怡(股指) 021-60635735 niejiayi@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F03124070 宏观金融团队 请阅读正文后的声明 ＃summary＃ 每日报告 | | 表1：国债期货1月29日交易数据汇总 | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 合约 | 前结算价 | 开盘价 | 收盘价 | 结算价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 （%） | 成交量 | 持仓量 | 仓差 | | TL2603 | 112.090 | 112.230 | 112.170 | 112.180 | 0.080 | 0.07 | ...

研究员：黄雯昕(国债集运) 021-60635739 huangwenxin@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3051589 研究员：聂嘉怡(股指) 行业 国债日报 日期 2026 年 1 月 27 日 研究员：何卓乔(宏观贵金属) 18665641296 hezhuoqiao@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3008762 021-60635735 niejiayi@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F03124070 宏观金融团队 请阅读正文后的声明 ＃summary＃ 每日报告 | | 表1：国债期货1月26日交易数据汇总 | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 合约 | 前结算价 | 开盘价 | 收盘价 | 结算价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 （%） | 成交量 | 持仓量 | 仓差 | | TL2603 | 112.290 | 112.330 | 112.510 | 112.460 | 0.220 | 0.20 | ...

Report Core View - The structural interest rate cut has been implemented, increasing the demand for medium - and long - term bonds. The abundant capital, stable liquidity, and moderate inflation support bond prices. However, the slight decline in Treasury bond yields implies weakening demand, and the rising US Treasury yields increase the pressure of capital outflows. It is recommended to pay attention to the MA60 support level and maintain a wait - and - see position [2] Data Presented 1. Yield and Interest Rate - The report shows the trends of 2Y, 5Y, 10Y, 30Y, and 7Y Treasury bond yields from 2024/04 to 2025/12, the trends of deposit - type institutional pledged repurchase weighted interest rates for 1 - day and 7 - day and 7 - day reverse repurchase rate from 2023/12 to 2025/12, and the trends of 7Y - 2Y and 30Y - 7Y Treasury bond term spreads from 2024/04 to 2025/12 [3] 2. Futures Position and Transaction Volume - The trends of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year Treasury bond futures positions from 2015/12 to 2025/12 and the trends of their trading volumes from 2024/04 to 2025/12 are presented [5][6] 3. Futures Basis and Spread - The trends of the basis of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year Treasury bond futures' current - quarter contracts are shown. Also, the trends of the current - quarter minus next - quarter spreads of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year Treasury bond futures are presented. Additionally, the trends of TS*4 - T and T*3 - TL cross - variety spreads are provided [7][14][16]

（来源：经济参考报） 随着年初结构性降息"落地"，债市后续如何演绎成为各界关注的焦点。业内人士认为，尽管来自资金面 的支撑尚存，但考虑到股市"春季躁动"、地方债供给压力、基本面边际改善等因素带来的扰动依旧，短 期债市大概率仍将呈现震荡格局。 政策加码添动能 宽松窗口启新篇 1月19日，央行下调再贷款、再贴现利率0.25个百分点，打响了年内货币政策宽松"第一枪"。 本次结构性降息与全面降息存在本质差异，并非通过下调政策利率带动LPR下行，而是聚焦重点领域精 准发力，下调后3个月、6个月和1年期支农支小再贷款利率分别降至0.95%、1.15%和1.25%，再贴现利 率降至1.5%，核心是降低银行从央行获取资金的成本，引导金融资源向小微企业、科技创新、绿色转 型等领域倾斜。 招联首席研究员、上海金融与发展实验室副主任董希淼指出，此次结构性"降息"不仅强化了对商业银行 的政策激励，更传递出明确信号，能吸引更多社会资本进入重点行业和产业。这是精准"滴灌"支持实体 经济、降低融资成本的关键一步。 对于债市而言，本次政策属于本轮降息周期中的补降环节，奠定了债市短期博弈的基础环境。 "结构性工具降息面临的掣肘更少，既能保护银 ...

Group 1 - The bond market sentiment has improved, with the long-end yields reaching a temporary low, as the 30Y active bond yield broke through 2.25%, down approximately 9 basis points from the monthly high [7][9] - Economic data for December was largely in line with expectations, having a limited impact on the bond market, while the equity market showed a slight slowdown [7][9] - The People's Bank of China announced an excess rollover of MLF, injecting liquidity into the market, which contributed to the overall downward trend in bond yields [7][9] Group 2 - The issuance of government bonds in Q1 2026 is expected to continue to be front-loaded, with a higher proportion of long-term bonds [13][14] - In January 2026, local government bond issuance significantly exceeded the same period last year, with 773.4 billion yuan issued, an increase of 215.9 billion yuan year-on-year, and a high proportion of long-term bonds [28][29] - The demand for long-term bonds remains weak, with institutional enthusiasm for new bonds not particularly high, although there is still some demand for new issues [33][38] Group 3 - The financial institutions' asset allocation pressure has eased, indicating a gradual weakening of the "asset shortage" in the bond market, which corresponds to fluctuations in the 10Y government bond yield [46] - The attractiveness of equity assets remains high, and the new margin policy is not expected to have a significant disruptive effect on the market [47][49] - The overall performance of long-term pure bond funds has been significantly lower compared to equity-related funds, indicating a lack of profitability in the bond market [49][51]

行业 国债日报 日期 2026 年 1 月 23 日 研究员：何卓乔(宏观贵金属) 18665641296 hezhuoqiao@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3008762 研究员：黄雯昕(国债集运) 021-60635739 huangwenxin@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F3051589 研究员：聂嘉怡(股指) 021-60635735 niejiayi@ccb.ccbfutures.com 期货从业资格号：F03124070 宏观金融团队 请阅读正文后的声明 ＃summary＃ 每日报告 | | 表1：国债期货1月22日交易数据汇总 | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 合约 | 前结算价 | 开盘价 | 收盘价 | 结算价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 （%） | 成交量 | 持仓量 | 仓差 | | TL2603 | 112.250 | 112.090 | 112.170 | 112.220 | -0.080 | -0.07 ...

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China has implemented a series of structural monetary policy measures, including a rate cut and increased loan quotas, to support enterprises in seizing opportunities and advancing their operations [1]. Group 1: Structural Monetary Policy Measures - Starting January 19, the People's Bank of China reduced the re-lending and re-discount rates by 0.25 percentage points, leading to significant cost savings for companies [2]. - The new rates for re-lending to support agriculture and small enterprises are set at 0.95%, 1.15%, and 1.25% for 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year terms, respectively, with a re-discount rate of 1.5% [2]. - The structural rate cut is expected to lower the financing costs for key sectors, enhancing the incentive for commercial banks to lend at lower rates [3]. Group 2: Impact on Enterprises - Companies like Changfei Advanced Semiconductor have benefited from lower loan rates, saving approximately 4.45 million yuan annually, which allows for accelerated project development [2]. - The total quota for re-lending aimed at technological innovation and transformation has been increased to 1.2 trillion yuan, expanding support to consumption, elderly care, and carbon reduction initiatives [4]. - Financial institutions are actively engaging with enterprises to ensure that the benefits of these policies reach them effectively, with significant loan support already provided to tech companies [4]. Group 3: Support for Private Enterprises - A dedicated quota of 1 trillion yuan for private enterprise re-lending has been established, which is expected to further reduce loan rates for these businesses [6]. - The average loan rate for a private enterprise is projected to decrease to 3.2%, resulting in interest savings of approximately 25,000 yuan [6]. - Recent measures aim to enhance the financing environment for private enterprises, encouraging innovation and investment, thereby stimulating economic recovery [6].

Group 1 - The 2026 first loan market quotation rate (LPR) remains unchanged for eight consecutive months, with the 1-year LPR at 3.0% and the 5-year LPR at 3.5% [1] - The stability in LPR is attributed to the consistent performance of major market interest rates and the lack of motivation for banks to lower LPR due to pressure on net interest margins [1][2] - Since June 2022, the LPR has remained stable, supported by strong exports and rapid development in high-tech manufacturing, allowing the macro economy to withstand external pressures [2] Group 2 - The People's Bank of China (PBOC) has implemented 10 policy rate cuts since the second half of 2018, leading to a decrease in the weighted average interest rates for new corporate and personal housing loans to around 3.1% [2] - A structural "rate cut" was announced, reducing the re-lending and re-discount rates by 0.25 percentage points, with new rates set for various loan terms [2] - Experts suggest that the timing for a comprehensive rate cut may be delayed due to the recent structural rate cut and the high initial credit growth at the beginning of the year [3] Group 3 - The PBOC's deputy governor indicated that there is still room for further reserve requirement ratio cuts, with the average ratio currently at 6.3% [3] - The stability of the RMB exchange rate and the ongoing easing of the USD provide a favorable environment for potential rate cuts [3] - The effectiveness of monetary policy transmission from the central bank to the financial system and then to the real economy is expected to improve, emphasizing the need for coordinated macro policies [4]