Core Insights - JPMorgan warns that U.S. inflation is proving to be more stubborn than expected, with multiple alternative inflation indicators suggesting that the disinflation process has stalled and core inflation is accelerating again [1][9] - The market's optimistic interpretation of the July CPI report may be misplaced, as various underlying inflation metrics indicate that inflation has not continued to decline and core inflation's sticky components are re-accelerating [1][5] Inflation Indicators - According to the Atlanta Fed, the sticky components of the traditional core CPI are slightly above pre-pandemic averages and have recently accelerated [2] - The Cleveland Fed's trimmed mean and median inflation indicators provide a more reliable assessment of inflation trends, with the trimmed mean inflation rebounding from 3.0% in April to 3.2% in July, and median inflation rising from a pre-pandemic average of 2.6% to the current 3.6% [5][8] Monetary Policy Challenges - The current inflation landscape presents complex challenges for Federal Reserve monetary policy decisions, as multiple alternative core indicators show inflation remains significantly above the Fed's 2% target and may continue to rise [9] - Unless an economic recession occurs, inflation is likely to remain sticky at levels that do not support more aggressive easing policies from the Fed, casting doubt on market expectations for rapid rate cuts [1][9]

Core Insights - The latest non-farm payroll data significantly impacts the U.S. economy, influencing stock markets, gold, and silver prices [1][3][4] - Strong non-farm data may lead to accelerated interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve, increasing borrowing costs for companies and potentially pressuring the stock market [1][4] - Conversely, weak non-farm data could ease rate hike pressures, providing support for the stock market [1][4] Impact on Financial Markets - Non-farm data directly affects the U.S. dollar's exchange rate, which in turn influences gold and silver prices [3][4] - Strong non-farm data typically reduces demand for gold as a safe-haven asset, leading to price declines, while weak data increases demand and drives prices up [3][4] - Silver prices are influenced by both safe-haven demand and industrial usage, making them sensitive to economic conditions reflected in non-farm data [3][4] Investment Strategy Considerations - Investors should analyze non-farm data in conjunction with economic outlook, monetary policy, and market sentiment to formulate effective investment strategies [4] - In the current economic landscape, both gold and silver markets present opportunities and risks, necessitating cautious monitoring of market dynamics [4]

Group 1: Market Style Divergence - The current market style divergence is primarily driven by macroeconomic conditions and policy direction, with high dividend sectors like banks and utilities becoming attractive in a declining risk-free interest rate environment [1] - The Hang Seng Technology Index has seen a year-to-date increase of over 20%, driven by new AI regulations and the accelerated return of Chinese concept stocks [1] Group 2: Impact of Fiscal and Monetary Policies on A-shares - The combination of proactive fiscal policy and moderately loose monetary policy has positively influenced the overall valuation and capital flow in A-shares, enhancing investor confidence and increasing the activity of leveraged funds [2] - Industries such as photovoltaics and AI have notably benefited from improved corporate profit expectations due to lower financing costs [2] Group 3: Long-term Market Sentiment from Real Estate and Exports - The stabilization of the real estate market positively impacts stock market sentiment, particularly benefiting banks, home appliances, and building materials sectors [3] - Strong export growth to ASEAN and Africa provides robust support for overall export data, despite uncertainties from US-China trade tensions [3] Group 4: Key Macroeconomic Variables for Growth and Value Style Divergence - Key macroeconomic variables influencing the divergence between growth and value styles include economic growth trends, interest rate changes, policy direction, inflation pressures, and global macro factors like Federal Reserve monetary policy [4] - A stable economic growth phase tends to expand demand in technology innovation sectors, boosting growth stock performance [4] Group 5: Investment Logic of Indices - The CSI Dividend Low Volatility 100 Index is designed to provide continuous cash flow returns with lower volatility, making it suitable for investors seeking stable cash flow [5] - The SSE Sci-Tech Innovation 100 Index focuses on mid-cap hard tech companies, emphasizing sectors like semiconductors and biomedicine, appealing to investors optimistic about domestic technology replacement trends [5] Group 6: Industry Distribution of CSI Dividend Low Volatility 100 Index - The index exhibits a "financial dominance + cyclical support" structure, with approximately 25% in industrials, over 22% in financials, and around 13% in materials [6] - This diversified design retains the advantages of industry dispersion while focusing on high dividend core sectors [6] Group 7: Dividend Asset Yield Advantage - In the current market environment, allocating to dividend low volatility index funds remains a favorable choice, especially as market volatility increases [7] - The supportive policies for dividend assets, such as the new "National Nine Articles" encouraging cash dividends from listed companies, enhance the long-term allocation value of dividend assets [7] Group 8: Core Competitiveness and Growth Potential of SSE Sci-Tech Innovation 100 Index - The core competitiveness of the SSE Sci-Tech Innovation 100 Index lies in its high R&D intensity and balanced coverage of key technology sectors, supported by policy incentives [8] - The index's average R&D intensity exceeds the average of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, covering critical areas like semiconductors and renewable energy [8] Group 9: Participation Methods for Ordinary Investors - Ordinary investors can participate in the CSI Dividend Low Volatility 100 Index and SSE Sci-Tech Innovation 100 Index through ETFs or ETF-linked funds, with options tailored for different investment strategies [9] - Specific funds like Bosera CSI Dividend Low Volatility 100 ETF and Bosera SSE Sci-Tech Innovation 100 ETF are suitable for investors familiar with market trading rules [9]

Core Viewpoint - International gold prices faced a decline due to reduced risk appetite following comments from Putin about a potential new arms agreement with the U.S. and a significant increase in the U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) for July, which raised concerns about inflation and diminished expectations for a rate cut by the Federal Reserve in September [1][2]. Group 1: Economic Indicators - The U.S. PPI for July increased by 0.9%, marking the largest rise in three years, which has led to heightened market concerns regarding inflation pressures [2]. - Following the PPI data release, the probability of a 25 basis point rate cut by the Federal Reserve in September dropped to 89.1% from approximately 95% prior to the announcement, indicating a shift in market sentiment [2]. Group 2: Gold Market Dynamics - Gold prices opened the week at $3,398.34 per ounce, reached a weekly high of $3,404.51, but subsequently fell over 1.6%, closing at $3,336.11, reflecting a total weekly decline of $62.23 or 1.83% [3]. - The fluctuations in gold prices suggest that the market is sensitive to changes in Federal Reserve policy expectations, with geopolitical uncertainties typically driving demand for gold [2].

Inflation Trends - The effective tariff rate for U.S. imports rose to 9.1% as of June 2025, with a cumulative increase of 6.9 percentage points since the beginning of the year[5] - Tariffs are expected to lead to an approximate 2.8% increase in U.S. goods prices based on a thumb rule calculation[40] - Core goods inflation is primarily driven by high import dependency and low inventory levels, particularly in categories like furniture and apparel[20] Economic Implications - The direct impact of tariffs results in about 50% of the tariff increase being passed on to consumer prices[24] - The indirect impact on domestic goods prices has shown signs of slowing, indicating limited transmission of tariff effects to local products[27] - Despite a rebound in goods inflation, core service inflation remains the largest contributor to nominal inflation, with a contribution of 82% to the CPI growth in June 2025[47] Future Projections - Inflation is expected to continue rebounding in the second half of 2025, with a peak CPI growth rate of approximately 3.2% by December 2025, followed by a decline to around 2.3% by mid-2026[56] - The market's consensus on inflation risks appears to be overestimated, particularly for mid-term projections, suggesting potential for further easing in monetary policy[61] - Political pressures may further influence the Federal Reserve's monetary policy, potentially leading to increased easing in 2026[64]

Core Viewpoint - The upcoming speech by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell at the Jackson Hole conference is anticipated to provide critical insights into the future path of U.S. monetary policy, amidst significant political pressure and economic challenges [1][3]. Group 1: Market Expectations - Investors are widely expecting a rate cut from the Federal Reserve in the coming weeks, which has driven stock markets, particularly interest-sensitive sectors, to historical highs [1]. - The probability of a 25 basis point rate cut at the September meeting is over 92%, with expectations for at least one more cut within the year [2]. Group 2: Economic Challenges - Powell faces a complex economic situation, balancing rising inflation due to tariff policies against signs of a cooling labor market and risks of economic slowdown [1][3]. - Recent economic data shows persistent inflation pressures, with the core Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising 0.3% month-over-month in July, the largest increase since January, and the Producer Price Index (PPI) surging 0.9%, the highest monthly increase in over three years [5]. Group 3: Political Pressure - The Trump administration has intensified its criticism of Powell for not cutting rates quickly enough, creating a challenging environment for the Fed's decision-making [2][3]. - Historical precedents of political interference in monetary policy, such as during the Nixon administration, highlight the potential risks of maintaining low rates in the face of rising inflation [3]. Group 4: Fed's Independence - Powell's upcoming speech is expected to focus on the Fed's monetary policy framework review, which is crucial for maintaining the central bank's long-term independence [6][7]. - Adjustments to the policy framework may establish guiding principles that extend beyond Powell's tenure, addressing how to respond to supply shocks and balancing full employment with price stability [6].

1. Investment Rating No investment rating information is provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints - The platinum - group metals market was previously trading on US tariff risks, with CME platinum and palladium inventories increasing significantly. As tariff trading receded and US inflation data exceeded expectations, market expectations for the Fed's interest - rate cuts declined, putting pressure on platinum - group metal prices. - Before the Fed's monetary policy shows a clear dovish turn, platinum - group metal prices are expected to remain weak. It is recommended to wait and see for now and wait for Fed Chairman Powell's statement at the Jackson Hole Central Bank Symposium. If there is a clear dovish stance, one can consider buying on dips at support levels [9]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Weekly Assessment and Market Outlook - **Platinum Key Data**: The closing price of the active NYMEX platinum contract rose 0.28% to $1345.2 per ounce; the five - day average trading volume decreased 8.21%; the open interest of the main contract increased 3.23%; the NYMEX platinum inventory increased 6.87%; the net long position of CFTC managed funds increased by 503 lots; the net short position of CFTC commercial decreased by 60 lots; the platinum ETF holdings decreased 0.14% [9]. - **Palladium Key Data**: The closing price of the active NYMEX palladium contract fell 1.85% to $1116 per ounce; the five - day average trading volume decreased 18.36%; the open interest of the main contract decreased 14.53%; the NYMEX palladium inventory increased 13.28%; the net short position of CFTC managed funds increased by 2219 lots; the net short position of CFTC commercial decreased by 482 lots; the palladium ETF holdings decreased 0.23% [9]. - **Technical Analysis**: The NYMEX platinum price is approaching the upward trend line, and attention should be paid to its reaction around the trend line. The NYMEX palladium price is at the trend - line support, and whether it can stabilize and rebound around the trend line needs attention [13][16]. 3.2 Market Review - **Platinum Price**: The NYMEX platinum main contract rose 0.28% to $1345.2 per ounce, and the open interest increased 1179 lots to 81726 lots. The Shanghai Gold Exchange platinum spot price rose 2.52% to 323.8 yuan per gram, and the internal - external price difference rebounded. The one - month implied lease rate of platinum dropped to 14.65%, and the overseas spot shortage eased. As of August 12, the net long position of NYMEX platinum managed funds increased by 503 lots to 12689 lots [21][27][31][36]. - **Palladium Price**: The NYMEX palladium main contract fell 1.85% to $1116 per ounce, and the open interest increased 1148 lots to 20191 lots. As of August 12, the net short position of NYMEX palladium managed funds was 4896 lots [24][39]. 3.3 Inventory and ETF Holdings Changes - **Platinum**: As of August 15, the total platinum ETF holdings were 74.6 tons. The CME platinum inventory increased 1007 kg to 18.1 tons, with registered inventory decreasing and unregistered inventory increasing [50][57]. - **Palladium**: As of August 15, the total palladium ETF holdings were 13.21 tons. The CME palladium inventory increased 464.7 kg to 3963.9 kg, with both registered and unregistered inventories increasing [53][62]. 3.4 Supply and Demand - **Platinum Supply**: The 2025 annual output of the top 15 platinum mines is expected to be 127.47 tons, a 1.9% decrease compared to 2024, indicating a contraction in mine - end supply [68]. - **Palladium Supply**: The 2025 annual output of the top 15 palladium mines is expected to be 165.78 tons, a 0.86% decrease compared to 2024, showing a slight contraction [71]. - **Chinese Imports**: China's platinum imports in June were 11.79 tons, a decline from May; palladium imports in June were 2.34 tons, an increase from May [74][77]. - **Automobile Production**: Data on automobile production in China, Japan, Germany, and the US are provided, but no specific supply - demand conclusions are drawn from these data in the report. - **Supply - Demand Balance**: The global platinum supply - demand balance in 2025F shows a deficit of 14.29 tons, while the global palladium supply - demand balance in 2025 shows a surplus of 3.50 tons [88][89]. 3.5 Monthly and Cross - Market Spreads - **NYMEX Platinum Monthly Spreads**: Data on spreads such as 1 - 4, 4 - 7, 7 - 10, and 10 - 1 are presented, but no specific analysis is provided [93][94][96][98]. - **NYMEX Palladium Monthly Spreads**: Data on spreads such as 3 - 6, 6 - 9, 9 - 12, and 12 - 3 are presented, but no specific analysis is provided [100][102][104][105]. - **London Spot - NYMEX Spreads**: Data on the spreads between London spot platinum and NYMEX platinum, and London spot palladium and NYMEX palladium are presented, but no specific analysis is provided [107].

Core Points - The Federal Reserve has officially closed the "Novel Activities Supervision Program," which was designed to regulate banks' activities in the cryptocurrency and fintech sectors, and will now integrate this oversight into standard banking regulations [1][2] - The closure of the program follows a deeper understanding of the risks associated with cryptocurrency activities, particularly after the collapse of three banks closely tied to the crypto industry [2][3] - The recent actions by the Federal Reserve signal a trend of increasing acceptance of the cryptocurrency industry by U.S. regulators, moving away from previous stringent requirements [4] Regulatory Changes - The "Novel Activities Supervision Program" was established to enhance oversight of banks' involvement in digital assets and blockchain technology, focusing on areas such as crypto asset custody and stablecoin issuance [3] - The latest regulatory changes simplify compliance processes for banks engaging in cryptocurrency activities, while core regulatory principles like anti-money laundering and consumer protection remain unchanged [3] Market Sentiment - Financial markets are highly anticipating a potential interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve, with a 92% probability of a 25 basis point reduction in September [6][7] - Recent inflation data has created uncertainty among Federal Reserve officials regarding the timing and extent of future rate cuts, with some officials suggesting a cautious approach [6][7]

Group 1 - The Federal Reserve announced the closure of the "Novel Activities Supervision Program," which was established to enhance the regulation of banks' activities related to cryptocurrencies and fintech [1][2] - The decision to close the program is based on the Federal Reserve's increased understanding of the risks associated with cryptocurrency activities and the integration of this knowledge into standard regulatory processes [2][3] - The closure follows the collapse of three banks closely tied to the cryptocurrency industry, highlighting the need for closer scrutiny of innovative technologies that may pose risks to the banking system [2][3] Group 2 - The "Novel Activities Supervision Program" focused on areas such as crypto asset custody, loans collateralized by cryptocurrencies, digital asset trading assistance, and the issuance of stablecoins and dollar tokens [3] - The latest regulatory changes simplify compliance processes for banks engaging in cryptocurrency activities, while core regulatory principles such as anti-money laundering and consumer protection remain unchanged [3] - The Federal Reserve's actions align with a broader trend among U.S. regulatory agencies to embrace the cryptocurrency industry, moving towards a more favorable regulatory environment [4] Group 3 - Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee expressed uncertainty regarding interest rate cuts due to mixed inflation data and ongoing tariff uncertainties [6] - Recent inflation reports indicate a rise in the Producer Price Index (PPI) by 0.9% in July, driven primarily by service sector inflation, which has raised concerns about the inflation outlook [6][7] - Market expectations for a 25 basis point rate cut in September are high, with a 92% probability indicated by interest rate swap traders, although future rate cut probabilities show divergence [7]

Group 1 - The Jackson Hole annual central bank symposium has evolved into a key platform for showcasing the policy thoughts of the Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell, amidst increasing political pressure and uncertain economic data [1][2] - Powell faces three core and challenging questions that will shape the potential path of the global macroeconomy and markets in the coming months [1] - The traditional economic theory that tariffs directly drive inflation is being challenged by current U.S. economic conditions, where the core Consumer Price Index (CPI) growth does not seem to stem from tariffs [1][2] Group 2 - There is a complex picture regarding import prices and domestic pricing strategies, with U.S. small businesses absorbing costs without raising prices, which may threaten future investment and profitability [1][2] - Powell's upcoming speech is expected to downplay the direct impact of tariffs on inflation while emphasizing data dependency to retain flexibility for the September interest rate decision [2][4] - The health of the labor market is a critical pillar of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy, but recent conflicting narratives about employment data create a challenging environment for Powell [2][3] Group 3 - If there is a significant labor supply shortage, businesses would typically raise wages, yet wage growth remains moderate, undermining the credibility of the labor shortage narrative [3] - Powell's stance on the labor market is crucial; he must balance acknowledging potential risks without alarming the market excessively [3][4] - The independence of the Federal Reserve is under scrutiny due to ongoing calls for interest rate cuts from the White House, complicating Powell's decision-making process [3][4] Group 4 - The market is divided on the extent of potential interest rate cuts in September and throughout the year, reflecting high uncertainty in the economic outlook [4] - Powell is likely to use the Jackson Hole platform to reclaim the narrative on monetary policy, emphasizing the Fed's goal of maintaining economic expansion and the need for timely and flexible policy decisions [4] - The upcoming speech is seen as a balancing act for Powell, as he navigates market anxieties, economic data warnings, and the need to uphold the central bank's independence [4]