| E 1 3/4 1 . | | | --- | --- | | - | | | 3 D | | | D | | | 1 | œ | | 1 | | | 原油 | 女女女 | | --- | --- | | 燃料油 | ☆☆☆ | | 低硫燃料油 ☆☆☆ | | | 沥青 | ☆☆☆ | 能源日报 2025年12月24日 王盈敏 中级分析师 F3066912 Z0016785 李海群 中级分析师 F03107558 Z0021515 010-58747784 gtaxinstitute@essence.com.cn 【原油】 围绕委内瑞拉的地缘紧张局势,引发脉冲式的"风险溢价"交易,推动油价反弹。然而,鉴于其他地区充足的闲 置产能以及委内瑞拉出口已因多年制裁而大打折扣，若单一因委内瑞拉原油供应中断引发的全球实质性供应收 紧预计有限。乌克兰对俄罗斯船只的袭击更添供应犹动风险。美国页岩油行业钻井与压裂活动虽降至数年新 低,然而由于产量调整存在时滞,美国原油产量仍维持在年内高位。她缘政治引发的溢价更倾向于提供阶段性 反弹动力。 【燃料油&低硫燃料油】 她缘政治风险仍在持续，进一步推高原油成本,并带动燃料油价格上行 ...

Report Industry Investment Ratings - Crude oil: ★★★, indicating a clearer bullish trend with a relatively appropriate investment opportunity currently [2] - Fuel oil: ★★★, suggesting a clearer bullish trend with a relatively appropriate investment opportunity currently [2] - Low-sulfur fuel oil: ★★★, meaning a clearer bullish trend with a relatively appropriate investment opportunity currently [2] - Asphalt: ★★★, showing a clearer bullish trend with a relatively appropriate investment opportunity currently [2] Core Viewpoints - Geopolitical factors, such as the Venezuela situation and Ukraine's attacks on Russian ships, cause short - term price rebounds in the energy market, but the long - term trend is dominated by the supply - demand relationship, with prices generally under pressure due to supply - side factors [3][4][5] Summary by Related Catalogs Crude Oil - Geopolitical tensions around Venezuela lead to a pulse - style "risk premium" trade, pushing up oil prices. However, the potential global supply shortage caused by a single - country supply interruption is limited. The attacks on Russian ships by Ukraine add supply risk. Although US shale oil drilling and fracturing activities are at multi - year lows, production remains at a high level this year. Geopolitical premiums provide short - term rebound power, while the long - term trend is a downward shift in the oil price center due to future supply - demand looseness [3] Fuel oil & Low - sulfur Fuel Oil - Geopolitical risks drive up crude oil costs, causing fuel oil prices to rise. The demand side lacks a clear upward driver, and the supply side is the main trading focus. High - sulfur fuel oil is in a tug - of - war between geopolitical risks and structural oversupply. Geopolitical factors provide short - term support, but mid - term supply is loose. Low - sulfur fuel oil is mainly affected by the operating status of refinery units, with expected marginal increases from unit maintenance and return, and is likely to continue a weak performance [4] Asphalt - Since December, the weekly shipment volume has been below 400,000 tons, at a near - four - year low. Last week, both social and factory inventories increased, with the factory inventory ending a de - stocking trend. Although the supply - demand situation is marginally looser, positive news boosts the price. Geopolitical conflicts provide short - term rebound power, but the long - term trend is price pressure due to supply - demand looseness [5]

格隆汇12月23日｜由于俄乌之间局势再度紧张，增加了黑海地区供应中断的风险，小麦价格目前维持在 去年 12 月中旬以来的最高水平附近。据乌克兰官员称，俄罗斯加强了对乌克兰部分港口的袭击，导致 基础设施受损，并引燃了装有面粉和植物油的集装箱。与此同时，俄罗斯表示，其黑海塔曼港遭到无人 机袭击，导致油轮、码头、管道及储罐受损。这些袭击正在放缓这一全球重要出口地区的粮食和油脂出 货量。CRM Agri Commodities在报告中指出，此前市场曾希望由美国支持的和平努力能结束冲突并解除 对两大谷物出口国贸易的威胁，风险溢价一度消退，但近期袭击促使风险溢价再度回归。 ...

Report Summary 1. Hot News - Li Qiang chaired a meeting of the leading group for the compilation of the Outline Draft of the 15th Five - Year Plan, emphasizing the planning of major projects to boost future development and current economic stability [2] - The People's Bank of China kept the one - year and five - year Loan Prime Rates (LPR) unchanged at 3% and 3.5% respectively for seven consecutive months [2] - Four futures exchanges will temporarily exempt certain handling fees for most futures varieties from January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026, and the China Financial Futures Exchange will halve some handling fees [2] - Federal Reserve Governor Milan said the need for a 50 - basis - point interest rate cut has weakened [2] - US President Trump will meet with senior national security officials, and Russia's Foreign Ministry is evacuating the families of diplomats in Venezuela [2] 2. Sector Performance - Key sectors to watch: silver, rapeseed oil, ethylene glycol, Shanghai nickel, and PVC [3] - Night trading performance: different commodity futures sectors showed varying degrees of increase, with the precious metals sector leading at 33.87%, followed by the non - ferrous metals sector at 24.53%, and the coal, coke, steel, and ore sector at 10.46% [3] 3. Sector Positions - The chart shows the changes in commodity futures sector positions in the past five days, but specific data is not described in text [4] 4. Performance of Major Asset Classes | Asset Class | Name | Daily Return (%) | Monthly Return (%) | Annual Return (%) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Equity | Shanghai Composite Index | 0.69 | 0.74 | 16.87 | | | SSE 50 | 0.53 | 1.70 | 12.49 | | | CSI 300 | 0.95 | 1.88 | 17.20 | | | CSI 500 | 1.20 | 3.19 | 26.72 | | | S&P 500 | 0.64 | 0.43 | 16.95 | | | Hang Seng Index | 0.43 | - 0.22 | 28.62 | | | German DAX | - 0.05 | 1.85 | 21.94 | | | Nikkei 225 | 1.81 | 0.30 | 26.34 | | | UK FTSE 100 | - 0.32 | 1.50 | 20.71 | | Fixed - income | 10 - year Treasury Bond Futures | - 0.09 | 0.04 | - 0.87 | | | 5 - year Treasury Bond Futures | - 0.06 | 0.11 | - 0.64 | | | 2 - year Treasury Bond Futures | - 0.02 | 0.08 | - 0.50 | | Commodity | WTI Crude Oil | 2.49 | - 0.80 | - 19.45 | | | London Spot Gold | 2.37 | 5.34 | 69.35 | | | LME Copper | 0.25 | 6.58 | 35.64 | | | Wind Commodity Index | 4.40 | 12.78 | 50.89 | | Other | US Dollar Index | - 0.46 | - 1.19 | - 9.42 | | | CBOE Volatility Index | 0.00 | - 8.81 | - 14.06 | [5] 5. Stock Market Risk Preference and Commodity Trends - The report presents charts of stock market risk preference and major commodity trends, including the Baltic Dry Index, CRB Spot Index, WTI crude oil, London spot gold and silver, LME copper, and agricultural futures, but specific data is not described in text [6]

资产概览：中债牛陡，白银领涨 [Table_Authors] 方奕(分析师) ——资产配置全球跟踪 2025 年 12 月第 3 期 本报告导读： 12/15-12/19，全球资产走势分化显著，发达/欧洲权益涨，新兴/亚洲权益跌。COMEX 银单周涨幅达 9.4%，年内涨幅破 120%。美联储 2026 年降息预期时间提前。 投资要点： 策略研究 /[Table_Date] 2025.12.22 | | 021-38031658 | | --- | --- | | | fangyi2@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880520120005 | | | 郭佼佼(分析师) | | | 021-38031042 | | | guojiaojiao2@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880523070002 | [Table_Report] 相关报告 成交活跃度下降，沪深 300 估值领涨 2025.12.21 消费景气线索增多，电子产业增长延续 2025.12.17 资产概览：全球风偏降温，贵金属领涨 2025.12.15 融资资金流入加速，外资重回流入 2025.12.15 海外联储降息 ...

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including their daily investment dynamics, moving averages, turnover rates, risk premiums, PE-TTM, dividend yields, and net asset break rates[1][2][4] - The turnover rate of the indices is calculated as the sum of the free-float market capitalization of constituent stocks multiplied by their turnover rates, divided by the total free-float market capitalization of the constituent stocks[17] - The risk premium is measured relative to the yield of 10-year government bonds, serving as a reference for risk-free rates, to evaluate the relative investment value and deviation of the indices[27][29] - The PE-TTM (Price-to-Earnings Trailing Twelve Months) is used as a valuation reference to assess the investment value of the indices at the current point in time[37][41] - Dividend yield is tracked to reflect the cash dividend return rate, which is particularly significant during market downturns as high dividend yields often act as a safe haven[46][51] - The net asset break rate is defined as the proportion of stocks with a price-to-book ratio below 1, indicating undervaluation in the market[52][55]

Content: --------- <doc id='1'>证券研究报告·金融工程报告 2025 年 12 月 18 日 江海证券研究发展部 金融工程定期报告 金融工程研究组 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动态 2025.12.18 ◆市场表现：2025 年 12 月 17 日, 各宽基指数（表 1）全部上涨，其中创业板指（3.39%） 投资要点：</doc> <doc id='2'>分析师：梁俊炜 执业证书编号：S1410524090001 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 和中证 500（1.95%）涨幅最大。当年涨跌情况，创业板指（48.3%）涨幅最大，其 次是中证 2000（30.48%）和中证 500（24.66%），中证 1000（22.34%）和中证全指 （21.17%）涨幅扩大，而上证 50（11.43%）涨幅最小。 ◆均线比较：除了中证 1000 和中证 2000，其余跟踪指数已突破 5 日及 20 日均线。 创业板指率先突破 60 日均线。各跟踪指数单日修复程度较大。 ◆资金占比与换手：2025 年 12 月 17 日, 沪深 300（25.34%）交易金额占比最高， 相关研究报告</doc> <doc id='3'>态 2025.12.17 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 态 2025.12.16 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 态 2025.12.15 其次是中证 2000（23.94%）和中证 1000（20.51%）。各宽基指数当前换手率分别 为中证 2000（3.88），创业板指（2.41），中证 1000（2.24），中证全指（1.63）， 中证 500（1.56），沪深 300（0.54）和上证 50（0.23）。 ◆日收益率分布：创业板指的峰度负偏离最大，中证 1000 的峰度负偏离最小。上 证 50 和创业板指的负偏态最大，中证 1000 和中证 2000 的负偏态最小。 ◆风险溢价：2025 年 12 月 17 日, 创业板指（97.14%）和中证 500（96.59%）风险 溢价近 5 年分位值较高，中证 1000（88.41%）和中证 2000（69.05%）较低。</doc> <doc id='4'>◆PE-TTM：中证 500（95.04%）和中证 1000（93.47%）分位值较高，而中证 2000 （79.17%）和创业板指（57.69%）分位值较低。 ◆股债性价比：没有指数高于其 80%分位，中证 500 低于其 20%分位。 ◆股息率：创业板指（63.22%）和中证 1000（51.65%）所处近 5 年历史分位值较 高，而中证 2000（31.32%）和中证 500（24.55%）较低。 ◆破净率：当前，各指数破净率为上证 50（22.0%），沪深 300（16.33%），中证 500（11.2%），中证 1000（8.3%），中证 2000（3.8%），创业板指（nan%）和中 证全指（6.51%）。 ◆风险提示：本报告可能存在数据缺失、数据错误、数据不及时、模型处理错误 等风险。本报告仅从金融工程角度，对重要指数的市场数据进行跟踪、统计、分 析，不构成对市场指数、行业或个股进行预测或推荐。</doc> <doc id='6'>| 市场衣乳… | | --- | | 1.1 指数表现 … | | 1.2 指数与均线的比较 | | 1.3 资全占比与换手率 … | | 2 日收益分布 | | 2.1 收益区间分布对比 | | 22 分布形态变化对比 | | 3 风险溢价 … | | 3.1 各宽基指数的风险溢价 | | 32 风险溢价历史分布 | | 4 PE-TTM. | | 4.1 各宽某指数 PE-TTM 和分位值 | | 4.2 PE-TTM 历史对比… | | 4.3 股债性价比历史对比… | | 5 吸血率… | | 5.1 近一年各宽某指数股息率变化情况, | | 5.2 股息率历史对比… | | 6 玻璃率 | | 7 风险提示 . |</doc> <doc id='8'>| 表 1、各宽基指数表现情况 | | --- | | 表 2、各宽基指数与均线、近250交易日高位和低位的比较 … | | 表 3 、各宽基指数分布形态变化 … | | 表 4、各宽基指数和十年期国债即期收益率的风险溢价 | | 表 5、各宽基指数 PE-TTM 分位值和历史值 | | 表 6、各宽基指数当前股息率和历史情况 | | 图 1、各宽基指数交易全额占比和换手率 | | 图 2、各宽基指数每日收益率分布情况 | | 图 3、各宽基指数相对十年国债即期收益率的风险溢价 | | 图 4、各宽基指数相对沪深 300 的风险溢价的近 5年分布 . | | 图 5 、各宽基指数 PE-TTM 及其分位值 | | 图 6、各宽基指数的股债性价比… | | 图 7、各宽基指数股息率 | | 图 8、各宽基指数破净个股数和占比………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 |</doc> <doc id='10'>1 市场表现 本报告将从指数涨跌幅、连阴连阳、上涨下跌分布等维度对各宽基指数进 行评价和跟踪。 1.1 指数表现 </doc> <doc id='11'>2025 年 12 月 17 日, 各宽基指数（表 1）全部上涨，其中创业板指（3.39%） 和中证 500（1.95%）涨幅最大。当周涨跌情况，各跟踪指数全部下跌，其中 中证 2000（-1.22%）和中证 1000（-1.12%）跌幅最大。当月涨跌情况，各跟踪 指数涨跌各现，其中创业板指（4.04%）和中证 500（1.51%）涨幅最大，而中 证 2000（-0.89%）和中证 1000（-0.62%）下跌。当季涨跌情况，各跟踪指数除 了上证 50（0.09%）外全部下跌，其中中证 1000（-3.78%）和中证 500（-3.7%） 跌幅最大。当年涨跌情况，创业板指（48.3%）涨幅最大，其次是中证 2000（30.48%） 和中证 500（24.66%），中证 1000（22.34%）和中证全指（21.17%）涨幅扩大， 而上证 50（11.43%）涨幅最小。 表 1、各宽基指数表现情况 指数名称 指数代码 当日涨幅% 当周涨幅% 当月涨幅% 当季涨幅% 当年涨幅% 日K </doc> <doc id='12'>| 指数名称 | 指数代码 | 当日涨幅% | 当周涨幅% | 当月涨幅% | 当季涨幅% | 当年涨幅% | 日K 连阴连阳 | 周K 连阴连阳 | 月K 连阴连阳 | 季K 连阴连阳 | 年K 连阴连阳 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 上证50 | 000016.SH | 1.25 | -0.10 | 0.74 | 0.09 | 11.43 | | | |

本文作者为创金合信基金首席经济学家魏凤春 自11月19日首席视点提出积极地等待后，市场处于相对僵持的状态。此后，我们陆续讨论了2026年流动 性、康波周期等五大周期，以及策略实施的问题。上期提出了锚定盈利、聚焦中游、工具适配的2026年 资产配置策略，其有效性根植于"风险溢价下行、盈利上行、结构分化"的三重共振。契合我们一直坚持 的"周期共振为锚、战略聚焦新动能、战术攻守兼备"的核心框架，在不确定性中锚定盈利确定性，在结 构分化中把握中游产业的稀缺价值。 在上述策略的实施中，还有一些基本的技术细节没有处理。这些细节对单一资产收益和风险边界的确 定，对股票、债券、黄金等不同资产性价比的认定具有决定性的作用，主要指资产配置的基准线。从宏 观策略的视角看，这些基准线由收益的基准线和风险的基准线组成。收益的基准线主要指基础因子中的 经济增长，GDP增长率和企业盈利率是最基本的分析因素。 风险的基准线主要指通货膨胀因子，CPI和PPI是主要观察对象。除此之外，无风险收益率是资产配置的 基准，这可以纳入流动性因子之中。投资者关注的流动性还包括资金的价格和资金的数量，资金的价格 包括贷款市场报价利率（LPR）以及人民币汇率 ...

Group 1 - The continuous narrowing of the STRD credit spread is a noteworthy market signal amidst increased volatility in digital assets [1] - Despite short-term pressure on Bitcoin prices, funds are flowing towards high-yield instruments with structural safeguards, indicating a subtle shift in investor risk appetite [1] - The STRD spread relative to the US 10-year Treasury reached a temporary low, suggesting increased demand for the preferred stock and improved perception of the issuer's credit quality [1] Group 2 - STRD maintains a premium of approximately 320 basis points over STRF, attributed more to capital structure hierarchy than short-term solvency differences [2] - Recent ATM issuance data shows STRD dominating, with weekly fundraising reaching a new high, reflecting a concentration of market funds towards higher-yielding subordinated preferred stocks [2] - The changes in STRD spreads and issuance rhythm may serve as important indicators for observing market sentiment and capital flows [2]

Core Viewpoint - Concerns regarding the U.S. Treasury market for 2026 are increasing, with the bond market reintroducing risk premium pricing ahead of the new year, despite potential further interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve [2][3]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The yield curve for U.S. Treasuries has steepened to its widest level in four years, with the 2-10 year spread surpassing the peak from April [2]. - The 10-year term premium, which reflects the extra compensation investors require for holding long-term U.S. Treasuries, has begun to rise again, reaching a three-month high [2]. Group 2: Upcoming Events - Key events in the U.S. Treasury market this week include the release of the latest employment report, October inflation data, and a 20-year Treasury auction, with potential impacts from the Bank of Japan's anticipated interest rate hike [4]. Group 3: Federal Reserve Concerns - Investor anxiety is driven by ongoing worries about potential changes in the Federal Reserve's response mechanism, particularly regarding political pressures affecting its independence [4]. - The uncertainty surrounding long-term inflation and the Fed's policy framework is a key factor pushing up risk premiums, contrasting with the post-2008 quantitative easing era [4]. Group 4: Leadership Speculation - President Trump has narrowed down the candidates for the next Federal Reserve Chair to Kevin Warsh and Kevin Hassett, with market perceptions shifting regarding their likelihood of appointment [6][8]. - Market sentiment suggests that Warsh's potential appointment may provide reassurance, while Hassett is viewed as more politically influenced [8]. Group 5: Policy Implications - Despite recent interest rate cuts, the Fed faces pressure from hawkish regional Fed presidents, which could lead to a more contractionary policy stance [9]. - The Fed's recent decision to actively purchase Treasury securities has raised questions about political interference and its implications for market liquidity and inflation risk premiums [10]. Group 6: Inflation Expectations - Current inflation expectations in the bond market are stabilizing around 2.5% [12].