Quantitative Models and Construction - **Model Name**: Three-dimensional Timing Framework **Construction Idea**: The model integrates liquidity, divergence, and prosperity indicators to assess market timing and risk levels[7][14][16] **Construction Process**: 1. **Liquidity Index**: Tracks market liquidity trends[22] 2. **Divergence Index**: Measures market disagreement levels[20] 3. **Prosperity Index**: Evaluates industrial prosperity trends[26] 4. Combines these three dimensions to form a comprehensive timing framework[14] **Evaluation**: Demonstrates stable performance in identifying market timing opportunities[16] - **Model Name**: Financing-Active Large Order Flow Intersection Strategy **Construction Idea**: Combines financing and large order flows to identify industries with strong capital inflows[34][40] **Construction Process**: 1. **Financing Flow Factor**: Neutralizes market capitalization and calculates the net financing buy-sell difference over a 50-day average[40] 2. **Active Large Order Flow Factor**: Neutralizes transaction volume and ranks net inflows over the past year, using a 10-day average[40] 3. Filters extreme industries and integrates both factors to enhance stability[40] **Evaluation**: Achieves stable annualized excess returns with reduced drawdowns compared to other strategies[40] Quantitative Models Backtesting Results - **Three-dimensional Timing Framework**: Historical performance shows stable risk assessment and timing capabilities[16] - **Financing-Active Large Order Flow Intersection Strategy**: - Annualized excess return: 13.5% - IR: 1.7[40] - Weekly absolute return: -1.6% - Weekly excess return: -0.1%[40] Quantitative Factors and Construction - **Factor Name**: Valuation Factors **Construction Idea**: Focuses on valuation metrics such as earnings yield and book-to-market ratios[46][47] **Construction Process**: 1. **Earnings Yield (ep_fy3)**: $ ep\_fy3 = \frac{1}{PE\_FY3} $ 2. **Book-to-Market Ratio (bp)**: $ bp = \frac{Shareholder\_Equity}{Market\_Value} $ 3. Neutralizes industry and market capitalization effects[46][48] **Evaluation**: Demonstrates strong performance across multiple timeframes and indices[46][48] - **Factor Name**: Growth Factors **Construction Idea**: Captures growth metrics such as revenue and profit growth rates[46][49] **Construction Process**: 1. **Revenue Growth (yoy_or)**: $ yoy\_or = \frac{Current\_Revenue - Previous\_Revenue}{Previous\_Revenue} $ 2. **Profit Growth (yoy_np)**: $ yoy\_np = \frac{Current\_Net\_Profit - Previous\_Net\_Profit}{Previous\_Net\_Profit} $ 3. Neutralizes industry and market capitalization effects[46][50] **Evaluation**: Performs better in large-cap indices and shows consistent excess returns[49][50] Quantitative Factors Backtesting Results - **Valuation Factors**: - Weekly excess return: 1.5%-2.18% - Monthly excess return: 1.46%-3.85%[48] - **Growth Factors**: - Weekly excess return: 1.52%-3.89% - Monthly excess return: 0.79%-3.02%[50] Quantitative Portfolios and Construction - **Portfolio Name**: Index Enhancement Portfolios **Construction Idea**: Adjusts factor selection based on research coverage to enhance index performance[51] **Construction Process**: 1. Divides stocks into high and low research coverage domains[51] 2. Applies suitable factors for each domain to optimize portfolio construction[51] **Evaluation**: Outperforms original index selection methods in terms of excess returns[51] Quantitative Portfolios Backtesting Results - **Index Enhancement Portfolios**: - **HS300**: - Weekly absolute return: -0.89% - Weekly excess return: 0.03% - Annualized excess return: 7.77%[52] - **CSI500**: - Weekly absolute return: 0.16% - Weekly excess return: 0.40% - Annualized excess return: 9.82%[52] - **CSI1000**: - Weekly absolute return: -0.58% - Weekly excess return: -0.74% - Annualized excess return: 9.26%[52]

证券研究报告|宏观研究报告 [Table_Date] 2025 年 06 月 22 日 [Table_Title] 地缘冲突的涟漪 [Table_Title2] 类权益周报 [Table_Summary] ► 行情回顾：地缘冲突的涟漪 6 月 9-13 日，权益市场高位回落。截至 2025 年 6 月 20 日， 万得全 A 收盘价为 5087.26，较 6 月 13 日下跌 1.07%。 小微盘行情显著承压，是本周市场较为关键的边际变化，这 或是在主动调和积累已久的结构性矛盾。5 月底中证 2000 拥 挤度达到历史高位，这对小微盘行情的支撑逻辑提出了更高 的要求。而地缘冲突的加剧则给了市场主动释放风险的窗 口，中证 2000 加速下跌。 ► 海外线索：以伊冲突延续，美联储继续暂停降息 本周以伊冲突延续，未见缓和迹象。同时，美联储继续暂停 降息，表态略偏鹰，预测偏向"滞胀"，推动美元走强。此 外，美国核心零售韧性仍存，汽车零售大幅放缓。日本方 面，日本央行维持利率不变，明年起削减购债规模。 整体来看，海外"乱纪元"的叙事并未改变，继关税之后， 中东地缘冲突爆发，美国搅入其中，进一步推升不确定性。 此外，距离 ...

证券研究报告·北交所报告·北交所定期报告 北交所定期报告 20250622 北证指数震荡回调，开展专精特新指数测试 2025 年 06 月 22 日 [Table_Tag] [Table_Summary] [Table_Summary] 北交所市场表现 行业重要新闻： 观点 证券分析师 朱洁羽 执业证书：S0600520090004 zhujieyu@dwzq.com.cn 证券分析师 易申申 执业证书：S0600522100003 yishsh@dwzq.com.cn 证券分析师 余慧勇 执业证书：S0600123070027 xuelx@dwzq.com.cn 研究助理 武阿兰 执业证书：S0600124070018 wual@dwzq.com.cn 相关研究 《瑞士央行、挪威央行双双宣布：降 息 25 个基点》 2025-06-19 《金融监管总局与上海市合力支持上 海金融中心建设》 2025-06-18 东吴证券研究所 1 / 9 执业证书：S0600524080003 yuhy@dwzq.com.cn 研究助理 薛路熹 请务必阅读正文之后的免责声明部 分 ◼ 行情回顾：从指数涨跌表现来看，截至 20 ...

金融工程 | 金工定期报告 金融工程 证券研究报告 量化择时周报：如期调整，止跌信号看什么？ 如期调整，止跌信号看什么？ 上周周报(20250615)认为：短期市场宏观不确定性增加和指数在震荡格局 上沿位置的压制下，风险偏好较难快速提升，继续维持中性仓位。最终 wind 全 A 全周表现先扬后抑，下跌 1.07%。市值维度上，上周代表小市值股票 的中证 2000 下跌 2.22%，中盘股中证 500 下跌 1.75%，沪深 300 下跌 0.45%， 上证 50 下跌 0.1%;上周中信一级行业中，表现较强行业包括银行、综合金 融，银行上涨 3.13%，医药、纺织服装表现较弱，医药下跌 4.16%。上周成 交活跃度上，石油石化资金流入明显。 从择时体系来看，我们定义的用来区别市场整体环境的 wind 全 A 长期均 线（120 日）和短期均线（20 日）的距离继续扩大，最新数据显示 20 日 线收于 5130，120 日线收于 5075 点，短期均线继续位于长线均线之上， 两线差值由上周的 0.99%扩大至 1.09%，距离绝对值继续小于 3%，市场继续 处于震荡格局。 风险提示：市场环境变动风险，模型基于历 ...

Oil Price and Inventory - Brent and WTI crude oil futures averaged $76.4 and $74.2 per barrel this week, up $7.0 and $6.3 from last week respectively[2] - Total U.S. crude oil inventory stands at 82 million barrels, with commercial inventory at 42 million barrels, strategic inventory at 40 million barrels, and Cushing inventory at 2 million barrels, showing a week-on-week change of -1.124 million, -1.147 million, +0.23 million, and -0.1 million barrels respectively[2] Production and Demand - U.S. crude oil production remains steady at 13.43 million barrels per day, with active oil rigs at 438, down by 1 rig[2] - U.S. refinery crude processing averaged 16.86 million barrels per day, down by 360,000 barrels per day, with a refinery utilization rate of 93.2%, a decrease of 1.1 percentage points[2] Import and Export Dynamics - U.S. crude oil imports and exports were 5.5 million and 4.36 million barrels per day respectively, resulting in a net import of 1.14 million barrels per day, with changes of -670,000, +108,000, and -175,000 barrels per day respectively[2] Refined Product Insights - Average prices for gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel in the U.S. were $95, $104, and $89 per barrel, with week-on-week changes of +$5.8, +$11.6, and -$5.1 respectively[2] - U.S. gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel inventories increased by 210,000, 510,000, and 1.03 million barrels respectively[2] Company Recommendations and Risks - Recommended companies include China National Offshore Oil Corporation, China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, and Sinopec Limited, among others[3] - Risks include geopolitical factors affecting oil prices, significant macroeconomic downturns, and potential changes in OPEC+ supply plans[3]

Table_First|Table_Summary 华福证券 固收定期研究 2025 年 6 月 22 日 如何看近期转债信用面变动 ➢ 如何看近期转债信用面变动 近期进入转债评级调整的密集披露期，若转债评级被下调个券卖压或增强；但评级调整 期结束后，未被评级下调的弱资质转债，若25年信用出现一定的优化，那么债底的修复 或支撑转债价格上升；我们认为转债6月-7月信用挖掘策略具有较强的性价比，投资者 一方面需要跟踪转债评级下调的可能，另一方面跟踪近期个券财务情况边际变化，预测 个券25年信用的变动方向。我们认为转债评级主要评估24年的财务变动和信用情况，通 过定量和定性的分析得到最新的评级结果，但是转债信用挖掘的预期差在于个券25年及 未来信用情况的定价，这方面评级结果解释力度或相对有限。 我们构建了转债信用评分模型，跟踪转债25年Q1的信用情况变动，观察哪些转债在财务 指标和信用资质上有边际优化，通过个券的信用变动分析中观行业层面的信用变动。转 债信用评分模型与转债信用评级互为补充，为投资者分析转债近期信用变动情况和构建 信用挖掘策略提供参考。 信用评分共包含6个维度：规模水平、营运能力、盈利能力、景气度、杠 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating The provided content does not mention the report industry investment rating. Core Viewpoints of the Report - China remains in a marginal de - leveraging process, with the goal of stabilizing the macro - leverage ratio unchanged. The large - scale debt resolution reduces local government financing costs and the probability of large - scale defaults and liquidity risks [2]. - The current loose money - market conditions are difficult to sustain, and the peak of the current round of money - market conditions is expected to occur between June 23 and July 4 [2][7]. - The stock - bond ratio favors bonds, and the equity style trends towards value. Currently, long - term bonds have a slightly higher cost - performance ratio than value - type equity assets [6][22][23]. Summary by Directory 1. National Balance Sheet Analysis Liability Side - In May 2025, the liability growth rate of the real - sector was 8.9%, slightly lower than the previous value of 9.0%. It is expected to reach its peak in April, decline to around 8.8% in June, and then gradually decline to around 8% by the end of the year [2][17]. - The money - market conditions of the financial sector were marginally stable and slightly loose last week. Given the marginal de - leveraging of the real sector, the loose money - market conditions are unlikely to continue [2][17]. - The net reduction of government bonds last week was 316 billion yuan, lower than the planned net increase of 218.6 billion yuan. This week, the planned net increase is 575.4 billion yuan. The government liability growth rate was 14.8% at the end of May, expected to rise slightly above 15% in June and then decline to around 12.5% by the end of the year [3][18]. Monetary Policy - Last week, the average weekly trading volume and price of funds increased, and the term spread widened. After adjusting for seasonal effects, the money - market conditions were marginally stable and slightly loose [3][18]. - The yield of one - year Treasury bonds decreased to 1.36% at the end of the week. The lower limit of the one - year Treasury bond yield is estimated to be around 1.3%, the lower limit of the ten - year Treasury bond yield is around 1.7%, and the lower limit of the thirty - year Treasury bond yield is around 1.9% [3][18]. Asset Side - In May, the physical - quantity data weakened compared to April. The government's target for the annual real economic growth rate in 2025 is around 5%, and the nominal economic growth rate target is around 4.9%. It is necessary to further observe whether this will become the central target for China's nominal economic growth in the next 1 - 2 years [4][19]. 2. Stock - Bond Cost - Performance and Stock - Bond Style - Last week, the money - market conditions were marginally stable and slightly loose, but risk appetite continued to decline. Funds flowed more towards short - term bonds, resulting in a continued "bearish stocks, bullish bonds" situation with a value - dominant style [6][21]. - The yields of short - term and long - term bonds declined slightly. The ten - year Treasury bond yield remained stable at 1.64%, the one - year Treasury bond yield decreased by 5 basis points to 1.36%, and the thirty - year Treasury bond yield decreased by 1 basis point to 1.84% [6][21]. - The broad - based rotation strategy outperformed the CSI 300 index by 0.52 percentage points last week and has outperformed it by 6.45 percentage points since July, with a maximum drawdown of 0.0% [6]. - The report recommends a portfolio of 40% dividend index, 40% SSE 50 index, and 20% 30 - year Treasury bond ETF [7][23]. 3. Industry Recommendation 3.1 Industry Performance Review - The A - share market declined with lower trading volume this week. The Shanghai Composite Index fell 0.51%, the Shenzhen Component Index fell 1.16%, and the ChiNext Index fell 1.66% [27]. - Among the Shenwan primary industries, banks, communications, electronics, food and beverages, and household appliances had the largest increases, while beauty care, textile and apparel, pharmaceutical biology, non - ferrous metals, and social services had the largest declines [27]. 3.2 Industry Crowding and Trading Volume - As of June 20, the top five industries in terms of crowding were electronics, computers, power equipment, machinery and equipment, and pharmaceutical biology, while the bottom five were comprehensive, beauty care, steel, coal, and building materials [29]. - This week, the top five industries with increased crowding were electronics, power equipment, communications, machinery and equipment, and computers, while the top five with decreased crowding were pharmaceutical biology, non - ferrous metals, national defense and military industry, automobiles, and textile and apparel [29]. - The average daily trading volume of the entire A - share market decreased from 1.37 trillion yuan last week to 1.22 trillion yuan this week. The industries with the highest year - on - year growth in trading volume were petroleum and petrochemicals, national defense and military industry, electronics, computers, and public utilities [30]. 3.3 Industry Valuation and Earnings - This week, among the Shenwan primary industries, banks, communications, electronics, food and beverages, and household appliances had the largest increases in PE(TTM), while beauty care, textile and apparel, pharmaceutical biology, non - ferrous metals, and social services had the largest declines [34]. - As of June 20, 2025, industries with high full - year 2024 earnings forecasts and relatively low current valuations compared to history include coal, petroleum and petrochemicals, power equipment, pharmaceutical biology, and consumer electronics [35]. 3.4 Industry Prosperity - In terms of external demand, there were mixed trends. The global manufacturing PMI in May fell from 49.8 to 49.6, while most of the disclosed PMIs of major economies in May rebounded. The CCFI index rose 8% week - on - week [39]. - In terms of domestic demand, second - hand housing prices declined in the latest week, and quantitative indicators showed mixed trends. The traffic volume of trucks on expressways increased, and the capacity utilization rate of ten industries showed a slight rebound in May and continued to rise slightly in June [39]. 3.5 Public Fund Market Review - In the third week of June (June 16 - 20), most active public equity funds underperformed the CSI 300. The 10%, 20%, 30%, and 50% weekly returns were 0.4%, - 0.2%, - 0.6%, and - 1.2% respectively, while the CSI 300 fell 0.45% [53]. - As of June 20, the net asset value of active public equity funds was estimated to be 3.41 trillion yuan, slightly lower than 3.66 trillion yuan in Q4 2024 [53]. 3.6 Industry Recommendation - In the de - leveraging cycle, the stock - bond ratio favors equity to a limited extent, and the value style is more likely to dominate. Dividend - type stocks are generally expected to have the characteristics of non - expansion, good earnings, and survival [8][23][57]. - The recommended A + H dividend portfolio includes 20 A + H stocks, and the A - share portfolio includes 20 A - share stocks, mainly concentrated in industries such as banks, telecommunications, petroleum and petrochemicals, and transportation [8][9][57].

证券研究报告 | 2025年06月22日 港股市场速览 优于大市 医药消费回撤，石油机械逆势吸金 股价表现：医药与消费带动市场总体回撤 本周，恒生指数跌 1.5%，恒生科技跌 2.0%。风格方面，大盘（恒生大型股 -1.4%）＞小盘（恒生小型股-2.0%）＞中盘（恒生中型股-3.3%）。 概念指数多数下跌，跌幅较小的有：恒生金融（-0.3%）；跌幅较大的有： 恒生创新药（-8.8%）、恒生消费（-4.3%）。 港股通行业中，2 个行业上涨，28 个行业下跌。上涨的有：电子（+3.0%）、 银行（+0.9%）；下跌的主要有：医药（-7.5%）、国防军工（-5.7%）、基 础化工（-5.4%）、轻工制造（-5.2%）、消费者服务（-5.2%）。 资金强度：总体持续流出，石油机械逆势吸金 本周，资金持续流出港股通成分股，总体日均资金强度（日均涨跌 x 日均 成交量）为-5.8 亿港元/日，上周为-8.0 亿港元/日，近 4 周平均为-1.6 亿 港元/日；近 13 周为-0.4 亿港元/日。 分行业看，8 个行业资金流入，21 个行业资金流出，1 个基本持平。资金流 入的主要有：机械（+1.3 亿港元/日）、电子（ ...

A股融资余额连续9日超1.8万亿元 东方财富Choice数据显示，6月9日至6月19日期间，A股融资余额连续9日站上1.8万亿元大关，其中6月18日达 到峰值18166.59亿元。 拉长时间来看，2024年2月至9月，A股沪深京三市融资余额基本维持在1.3万亿元至1.5万亿元的水平，自2024 年10月起开始抬升至1.5万亿元以上，11月中下旬站上1.8万亿元关卡。 今年以来，A股融资余额有所波动，3月中下旬曾一度冲至1.9万亿元的高位，4月中旬至6月初又回落至1.8万亿 元以下，直至6月9日再次站上1.8万亿元。 从杠杆资金每日买入动能来看，6月9日至6月19日期间，连续9个交易日融资资金单日买入额超过1000亿元，其 中6月10日融资买入额高达1267.5亿元，成为近两周峰值。 从融资资金单日净买入额来看，本周前三天（6月16日至6月18日）为净买入，这三日的净买入额分别为55.92 亿元、52.71亿元、13.39亿元；而6月19日则偿还额大于买入额，净买入额为-74.79亿元。 近期，杠杆资金持续活跃。根据交易所披露的最新数据，截至6月19日，A股沪深京三市融资余额连续9日 站上1.8万亿元大关，相比 ...

石化周报 地缘冲突持续发酵，油价或高位宽幅震荡 2025 年 06 月 21 日 ➢ 地缘冲突持续发酵，油价或高位宽幅震荡。6 月 16 日，因伊朗请求卡塔尔、 沙特和阿曼要求特朗普施压以色列促使以色列停火，叠加 G7 集团领导人呼吁以 色列和伊朗缓和局势，市场对地缘持续性的预期有所减弱，布伦特油价最低回落 至 71 美元/桶以下。然而，由于多重因素的影响，以伊冲突目前看不到短期结束 的迹象，油价本周依然呈现上涨趋势。时间线上来看，美国方面多次呼吁伊朗签 署限制其核计划的协议，在 6 月 17 日特朗普在社交平台上发文称"伊朗本应签 署我让他们签署的'协议'"后，6 月 18 日美国扩大了其在中东地区的军事部 署；而伊朗态度相对坚决，同日其表示不接受压力下达成的和平；6 月 19 日， 美国表示将在未来两周内决定美国是否介入以色列和伊朗的冲突；6 月 21 日最 新消息，伊朗表明愿意在以色列"停止侵略"后考虑通过外交途径解决伊核问题， 而特朗普表示"可能支持以伊停火，但让以色列停下来很难，也许美国没必要打 击伊朗"。从美国的表态来看，以伊冲突短期或仍将持续，此外，伊拉克表示近 几天已有 50 架以色列战机侵犯 ...