中信建投公告称，间接全资附属公司CSCIF Hong Kong Limited于2026年2月25日完成中票计划项下8亿 元票据发行。全资子公司中信建投国际同日签署担保协议，为该票据提供8亿元无条件及不可撤销的连 带责任保证担保，无反担保。截至公告披露日，公司及控股子公司实际担保金额471.22亿元，占最近一 期经审计净资产的44.26%，无逾期担保情况。此次票据发行资金用于补充境外业务营运资金。 ...

债 券 研 春节期间不可错过的事情 [Table_Authors] 唐元懋(分析师) 国内篇 本报告导读： 经济复苏节奏延续温和，呵护债市偏多环境，但需关注海外风险偏好回升带来的扰 动。 投资要点： 风险提示：流动性超预期收紧；经济修复大幅加速；债券供给放量。 | | | | | 0755-23976753 | | --- | --- | | | tangyuanmao@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880524040002 | | | 孙越(分析师) | | | 021-38031033 | | | sunyue6@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880525080004 | | | 汤志宇(分析师) | | | 021-38031036 | | | tangzhiyu@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880525070031 | | | 杜润琛(分析师) | | | 021-38031034 | | | durunchen@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880525110004 | [Table_Report] 相关报告 央行视角下的货币财政协同与存款搬 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report - The short - end of the bond market depends on the central bank. The central bank's influence on the short - end funding has increased, bringing stability to the funding and alleviating the funding stratification. In the absence of interest rate cuts, the overnight funding rate corridor is expected to be between 1.2% - 1.4%. The short - end prices will be more stable, and the non - bank funding price stratification will also be fully alleviated. The performance of short - term bonds within 10 years is more related to the central bank's interest rate cuts and funding control [1][9][16]. - The long - end of the bond market depends on fiscal policy. The supply of ultra - long government bonds is an important factor affecting the long - end term spread. It is expected that the supply of ultra - long government bonds this year may still put upward pressure on the ultra - long - end bond yields. The 30 - year treasury bond yield is expected to break through the 2.2% key point, but after the breakthrough, attention should be paid to the post - festival fiscal supply. The 30 - year bond is more suitable as a flexible variety for right - side trading [1][9][34]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs Short - end Depends on the Central Bank - **Increased Influence and Stability**: The central bank's influence on the short - end funding has significantly increased, bringing stability to the funding and basically solving the funding stratification problem, providing a stable space for carry strategies. Without interest rate cuts, the subsequent overnight funding rate corridor is expected to be between 1.2% - 1.4%. As the domestic interest rate transmission mechanism improves, short - end funding prices will be more stable, and the interest rate corridor, especially the upper limit, will narrow [1][9][16]. - **Alleviation of Non - bank Funding Stratification**: In Q1 2025, the spread between DR001 and R001 widened rapidly, but since then, the funding stratification has been significantly alleviated. Currently, the monthly spread between DR and R is stable within 10BP, providing a stable coupon strategy for non - banks. The performance of short - term bonds within 10 years is more related to the central bank's interest rate cuts and funding control [9][17]. - **Overseas Experience**: The Federal Reserve effectively controls the short - end bond market interest rates. The one - year US Treasury bond yield moves almost in line with the federal benchmark interest rate [9][30]. Long - end Depends on Fiscal Policy - **Influence of Ultra - long Government Bond Supply**: Ultra - long government bond supply is an important factor affecting the long - end term spread of the bond market, and the 30Y - 1Y spread is more sensitive to this factor than the 10Y - 1Y spread. Empirical results show that the net financing of ultra - long bonds and CPI year - on - year have a positive driving effect on the term spread, and the 30 - year treasury bond is more sensitive to the supply shock of ultra - long bonds [34]. - **Overseas Experience**: In the long run, the long - end US Treasury bond yields are affected by fiscal factors. However, during special periods such as QE or QT, they are disturbed by the Federal Reserve's policies. The scale of government debt on the fiscal side, especially the outstanding balance of long - term Treasury bonds, has a significant impact on the long - bond term spread [36]. - **Domestic Situation in 2026**: Since 2026, the issuance duration of local bonds has continued to lengthen. As of February 10, 2026, the weighted issuance duration of local bonds was 13 years, an increase of 0.6 years compared to last year. The new local bond issuance scale in January 2026 was 4285 billion yuan, slightly higher than 3053 billion yuan in the same period last year. It is expected that the overall fiscal rhythm this year will be the same as last year, with the supply peak mainly in the second and third quarters. The supply of ultra - long government bonds this year may still be a risk factor for the bond market. The 30 - year treasury bond yield is expected to break through 2.2%, but after the breakthrough, attention should be paid to the post - festival fiscal supply, and it is more suitable for right - side trading [9][39][43].

国开利差滞后修复。 1 月中下旬以来，债券市场整体迎来一轮修复，但品种间表现分化：国债反弹相对顺畅，而国开债走势偏弱，二者之 间的利差不仅未见收敛，反而有所走阔，反映本轮反弹过程中，国开修复滞后。 修复滞后的几个原因。 首先，交易盘追涨意愿克制，大行对长端国债需求旺盛，对国开利差修复形成约束。以"交易盘与配置盘力量对比" 来刻画两类机构的边际影响力，该指标与国开-国债利差走势具有较清晰的同步性：在交易盘相对走弱、配置盘占主 导的时期，利差往往趋于走阔。回顾历史，这一结构变化大致自去年 8–9 月开始显现，并在今年 1 月的反弹行情中 未见明显逆转，这一特征不利于国开利差的修复。进一步看，配置盘方面，大行在本轮反弹过程中对国债老债集中买 入，提供了长端国债的稳定承接力量，而国开则缺乏同等力度的配置需求，从而对长端国开利差的修复形成压制。 反弹中资金选择二永利差作为主要进攻方向。第二个原因在于，在交易情绪回暖阶段，本轮行情更多围绕二永等信用 利差展开。以 3 年 AAA-二级资本债为例，这一轮反弹中，其信用利差由阶段性高点约 33bp 压缩至最低约 19bp，下行 幅度接近 12bp。 央行买债的边际影响。央行购 ...

Group 1 - The report highlights two key questions for the bond market in February: identifying investment opportunities and whether to hold bonds over the holiday period [12][43] - The 10-year government bond yield is currently at 1.8%, and the 1-year deposit rate is at 1.6%, indicating a low level that requires strong positive stimuli for any significant breakthroughs [12][43] - The report suggests that the bond market may remain volatile until strong positive factors emerge, with a focus on the trading value of 30-year government bonds and TL [12][43] Group 2 - From a credit bond perspective, the report recommends reducing focus on 3-year subordinated capital bonds due to limited arbitrage space of around 30 basis points [12][44] - It suggests paying attention to 1-2 year low-grade credit bonds and 3-5 year high-grade credit bonds based on demand preferences [12][44] - The report notes that since the beginning of January, the performance of the certificate bonds has been weaker than expected, primarily due to low demand for bond funds [12][44] Group 3 - The report discusses the strategy of holding bonds over the holiday, indicating that the current yield on 10-year government bonds is low, limiting further downside potential [12][45] - It suggests that if the yield rises above 1.85%, it may be worth considering holding bonds over the holiday [12][45] - The report emphasizes the need to monitor economic data and market conditions post-holiday, as these could influence the likelihood of interest rate cuts [12][45] Group 4 - The report outlines four bond selection strategies: focusing on TL and slightly higher yield next-active bonds for high-frequency trading, considering ultra-long bonds for odds, and monitoring specific long-end and mid-term bonds [12][17] - It highlights the potential for the 30-year government bond's trading value and the relative value of certificate bonds as key areas of interest [12][17] - The report also notes that the current pricing of floating rate bonds appears expensive, suggesting a focus on 2-3 year floating rate certificate bonds [12][17] Group 5 - The report indicates that the current pricing of government bond futures is reasonable relative to cash bonds, with limited relative value for futures arbitrage [12][18] - It suggests that if there are concerns about low bond yields leading to adjustment risks, short-term hedging strategies in futures could be considered [12][18] - The report recommends continuing to select T contracts for participation in strong relative government bond markets, despite potential short-term price adjustments [12][18] Group 6 - The report provides a weekly review of the bond market, noting that the overall performance has been volatile, with long-end certificate bonds and ultra-long government bonds showing weaker performance [21] - It highlights that the strong willingness of banks to allocate funds and the slight decline in overnight funding rates have positively impacted the performance of government bonds and deposits [21] - The report includes specific yield changes for various government bonds, indicating fluctuations in the market [22][24]

短期内，可直接观察同一主体发行的、剩余期限极为接近（通常相差在 0.5 年以内）的新券和老券，计算并追踪其收 益率差值的动态变化。该利差能更及时地反映市场对增值税补偿的定价，从而避免了对整条曲线进行估值调整的诸多 强假设。 对于普通非金信用债，剔除增值税影响后的信用利差等于基于中债收益率曲线计算的信用利差+同期限国债/国开债新 老券利差；而对于二永债等金融债券，剔除增值税影响后的信用利差等于基于中债收益率曲线计算的信用利差+同期 限国债/国开债新老券利差-同期限金融债新老券利差。 同样需要注意的是，新老券利差还原法亦存在局限。首先，新券通常流动性优于老券，其收益率本就包含流动性折价， 这与增值税补偿要求的收益率上行力量相反。因此，观测到的利差是两者净效应的结果，可能低估了真实的税收补偿 要求。其次，对二永债等信用债新发券，可比的配对券样本相对稀缺，部分期限、等级信用债利差难以靠该方法还原。 总的来看，新老券利差还原法更适用于捕捉短期交易机会、监控市场情绪。如若评估债券资产长期配置价值，或进行 历史回溯，则税负补偿倒推法亦有使用空间。 由于信用利差通常以"信用债收益率减同期限国开债/国债收益率"计算，当基准利率 ...

Group 1 - The report highlights a "non-typical" tight balance in the supply and demand for ultra-long bonds, indicating that banks are not lacking in liabilities but are missing interest rate risk indicators [5][11][14] - It is noted that the issuance of ultra-long local government bonds is expected to increase significantly in February, potentially exceeding 9,900 billion, which is higher than the issuance in January and March [21][25] - The report suggests that the market should be cautious about the potential disturbances in the bond market due to increased supply of local government bonds after the Spring Festival [29][28] Group 2 - The analysis indicates that the widening of the 30-10Y yield spread is attributed to the persistent tight balance in the supply and demand for ultra-long bonds, which has not fundamentally eased [10][8] - The report emphasizes the importance of timing in the bond market, particularly regarding when to avoid exposure to ultra-long bonds due to expected fluctuations in supply and demand dynamics [19][28] - It is recommended that investors maintain a cautious approach, focusing on medium to short-term bonds with high coupon rates and low volatility, especially as the market approaches the end of February [29][28]

Market Overview - The credit bond market has transitioned from a "continuous recovery" phase to a "consolidation" phase, with marginal momentum weakening[7] - The overall yield of credit bonds has shown fluctuations, supported by configuration demand, leading to a flattening of the credit bond curve[7] - The net financing for major credit bond varieties was 1,497.8 billion CNY, remaining stable compared to the previous week[11] Investment Strategy - The investment strategy suggests a return to a focus on coupon income, emphasizing 2-3 year maturity products while ensuring manageable credit quality[8] - For long-term funds with excess allocation needs, attention should be given to 5-year and longer maturities during market fluctuations[8] Market Dynamics - In the secondary market, total transactions decreased to 8,813.3 billion CNY, down 498.47 billion CNY from the previous week[14] - The 3-year AAA medium-term note yield decreased by 0.05 basis points to 1.85%, while the 3-year AA+ and AA medium-term note yields fell by 2.05 and 4.05 basis points, respectively[14] Credit Rating Adjustments - Seven issuers had their ratings upgraded, including Shaoxing City Shangyu Water Group and Wuxi Huaguang Environmental Energy Group[21] - No new defaults were reported, but one bond, H20 Yuzhou 1, was extended, with a balance of 846 million CNY[23] Risk Factors - Potential risks include unexpected changes in fundamentals, monetary policy not meeting expectations, and possible data inaccuracies[23]

Group 1 - The current credit bond market is transitioning from a phase of continuous recovery to a phase of oscillation and convergence, with marginal momentum weakening [7][8] - The overall yield of credit bonds is stabilizing, supported by configuration demand, and the credit spread is expected to return to a narrow oscillation range [8] - The investment strategy should focus on coupon income, particularly targeting 2-3 year maturity bonds while maintaining controllable credit quality to seek excess returns [8] Group 2 - In the primary market, net financing for credit bonds remained stable, with a total issuance of 2,945 billion yuan and a net financing of 1,497.8 billion yuan, which is similar to the previous week [11] - In the secondary market, trading volume decreased to 8,813.3 billion yuan, down by 498.47 billion yuan from the previous week, indicating a contraction in trading activity [14] - The yield on 3-year AAA medium-term notes decreased by 0.05 basis points to 1.85%, while AA+ and AA medium-term notes saw declines of 2.05 and 4.05 basis points, respectively [14][15] Group 3 - The credit rating adjustments included seven issuers with upgrades, indicating a positive trend in credit quality among certain entities [11] - The market is witnessing a notable increase in trading activity for mid-to-high grade real estate bonds following the approval of Vanke's domestic bond extension plan [8][11] - The valuation recovery opportunities for central state-owned and local state-owned enterprise bonds within a two-year maturity are worth monitoring due to previous sentiment impacts [8]

Group 1 - The issuance of industrial perpetual bonds is primarily by high-rated entities, with an increase in issuance duration over the past two years. The main purpose of issuing these bonds is to reduce liabilities, predominantly by medium to high-rated central and state-owned enterprises in high-leverage industries. Since 2024, the issuance duration of industrial perpetual bonds has lengthened, with "3+N" still being the main issuance type, but the scale and proportion of "5+N" industrial perpetual bonds have significantly increased, possibly related to expectations of debt reduction and the overall lengthening of credit bond issuance duration [6][7]. - The spread of industrial perpetual bond varieties has widened to a high percentile, indicating opportunities for spread extraction. Since the second half of 2025, the spread of industrial perpetual bond varieties has continued to widen, influenced by two main factors: first, the marginal weakening of demand for perpetual bonds under the insurance I9 accounting standards, as the static coupon of perpetual bonds is weaker than that of dividend stocks; second, perpetual bonds are less likely to benefit from the expansion of credit bond ETFs due to stricter definitions of equity instruments. Currently, the spread of industrial perpetual bonds has widened to a high percentile since 2024, with the spread of varieties accounting for about 50% of the overall spread, reaching a high level since 2020. It is believed that institutional behavior will have limited further disturbance to industrial perpetual bonds, and attention should be paid to opportunities for spread extraction [7][8]. Group 2 - In the primary issuance market, net financing has increased. From January 19 to January 23, 2026, short-term financing bonds issued amounted to 128.06 billion yuan, with 86.04 billion yuan maturing; medium-term notes issued were 91.51 billion yuan, with 28.01 billion yuan maturing; corporate bonds issued were 1 billion yuan, with 4.1 billion yuan maturing; and company bonds issued were 102.05 billion yuan, with 52.55 billion yuan maturing. The total issuance of major credit bond varieties was 322.61 billion yuan, with 170.7 billion yuan maturing, resulting in a net financing of 151.91 billion yuan, an increase from the previous week's net financing of 49.27 billion yuan [8]. - In the secondary trading market, transaction volume has increased, and most spreads have narrowed. From January 19 to January 23, 2026, the total transaction volume of major credit bond varieties (corporate bonds, company bonds, medium-term notes, and short-term financing bonds) reached 931.2 billion yuan, an increase of 69.4 billion yuan compared to the previous week. The overall yield of medium-term notes has decreased, with the 3-year AAA medium-term note yield down by 3.43 basis points to 1.85%, the 3-year AA+ medium-term note yield down by 4.43 basis points to 1.93%, and the 3-year AA medium-term note yield down by 4.43 basis points to 2.08% [13][14].