三月债市能平稳吗：几个关键点 [Table_Authors] 唐元懋(分析师) 本报告导读： 3 月债市或维持震荡，但季末有变盘可能。 债券研究 /[Table_Date] 2026.03.01 市 场 策 投资要点： | | 0755-23976753 | | --- | --- | | | tangyuanmao@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880524040002 | | | 孙越(分析师) | | | 021-38031033 | | | sunyue6@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880525080004 | | | 杜润琛(分析师) | | | 021-38031034 | | | durunchen@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880525110004 | [Table_Report] 相关报告 高位震荡延续，低估值防守为先 2026.02.28 2025 银行经营指标拆解：分层扩张 vs 趋同修复 2026.02.25 票息行情未止：接续力量和可挖掘的标的 2026.02.24 节前蓄势，节后可期 2026.02.23 节前冲高回落，多头趋势还在 ...

Group 1 - The core distinction between government bonds and corporate bonds lies in credit risk, with government bonds backed by national credit and having a very low default risk due to strict issuance and repayment mechanisms established by financial market regulations revised in 2025 [1] - Corporate bonds, on the other hand, are subject to the financial health and operational stability of the issuing companies, which can lead to default risk if companies face declining profitability or excessive debt burdens [1] - Interest rate risk affects both types of bonds, but government bonds typically exhibit less price volatility compared to corporate bonds due to their higher credit ratings and more rigid market demand [1] Group 2 - Government bonds demonstrate superior liquidity, being actively traded in the open market with a diverse range of participants, allowing for quick transactions at reasonable prices [2] - In contrast, corporate bonds' liquidity is influenced by factors such as issuance scale and credit ratings, with smaller issuers potentially facing higher transaction costs or difficulties in executing trades [2] - The repayment risk at maturity is significantly lower for government bonds, as their repayment is secured by stable fiscal revenues, whereas corporate bonds depend on the issuing company's cash flow, which can lead to potential payment failures [2] Group 3 - Policy risk impacts government and corporate bonds differently, with government bonds being less affected by macroeconomic policy adjustments aimed at market stability, while corporate bonds may be influenced by specific industry or tax policies that could affect the issuer's performance [2]

债 券 研 春节期间不可错过的事情 [Table_Authors] 唐元懋(分析师) 国内篇 本报告导读： 经济复苏节奏延续温和，呵护债市偏多环境，但需关注海外风险偏好回升带来的扰 动。 投资要点： 风险提示：流动性超预期收紧；经济修复大幅加速；债券供给放量。 | | | | | 0755-23976753 | | --- | --- | | | tangyuanmao@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880524040002 | | | 孙越(分析师) | | | 021-38031033 | | | sunyue6@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880525080004 | | | 汤志宇(分析师) | | | 021-38031036 | | | tangzhiyu@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880525070031 | | | 杜润琛(分析师) | | | 021-38031034 | | | durunchen@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880525110004 | [Table_Report] 相关报告 央行视角下的货币财政协同与存款搬 ...

Group 1 - The core difference between government bonds and corporate bonds lies in credit risk, with government bonds backed by national credit and having a very low default risk, while corporate bonds depend on the issuer's financial health and can face higher default probabilities, especially for lower-rated bonds [1] - Government bonds have a strong repayment guarantee as their repayment is included in the annual fiscal budget, while corporate bonds are subject to market fluctuations and operational risks [1] Group 2 - Interest rate risk affects both types of bonds, but government bonds are more sensitive due to their longer durations, while corporate bonds also face credit spread changes that can amplify price declines during market downturns [2] - Both bond types are vulnerable to inflation, but corporate bonds may have an advantage if issuers can adjust prices or optimize costs, thus maintaining more stable real returns compared to long-term government bonds [2] Group 3 - Liquidity risk varies significantly, with government bonds being highly liquid and easily tradable, while corporate bonds' liquidity depends on the issuer's size and credit rating, with smaller or lower-rated issuers facing potential liquidity issues [3] - High-rated corporate bonds from large state-owned enterprises tend to have better liquidity compared to those from smaller or lower-rated companies [3] Group 4 - Policy risk impacts government and corporate bonds differently, with government bonds influenced by macroeconomic fiscal and monetary policies, while corporate bonds are more susceptible to industry-specific regulations and policies that can directly affect their credit status [4] - Changes in fiscal policy and central bank operations generally do not pose substantial risks to government bond principal, whereas corporate bonds can be significantly affected by industry regulations that may increase financing costs or disrupt cash flows [4]

Group 1 - Foreign investors are expected to accelerate their purchases of U.S. financial assets in 2025, with a net buying of $1.55 trillion, up from $1.18 trillion in 2024, countering the narrative of "selling America" [1] - The inflow includes $658.5 billion into stocks and $442.7 billion into U.S. government bonds [1] - Despite concerns over potential tariffs and geopolitical tensions, U.S. Treasury Secretary has defended the attractiveness of the U.S. as a capital destination [1] Group 2 - Geopolitical instability has led to increased popularity of shorting the dollar, but the significant share of U.S. debt in global sovereign holdings is unlikely to change [2] - Last year's dollar depreciation may have prompted some overseas asset management firms to increase their holdings in U.S. securities, with cross-border investors taking advantage of valuation adjustments [3] - In 2024, net purchases of corporate bonds reached $327.8 billion, and securities issued by agencies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac saw net purchases of $112.9 billion [3] Group 3 - China has become a significant net seller of U.S. long-term financial assets, with a net sale of $208.6 billion in 2025, and its holdings of U.S. government bonds fell to $683.5 billion, the lowest since 2008 [4] - In December alone, foreign holdings of U.S. government bonds decreased by $88.4 billion to $9.27 trillion, marking the lowest level since October [4] - Japan and the UK also reduced their holdings of U.S. government bonds, with Japan's holdings down by $17.2 billion to $1.19 trillion and the UK's down by $23 billion to $86.6 billion [4]

Core Insights - The article discusses the differences in risk levels between government bonds and corporate bonds, emphasizing the importance of understanding these differences for investment decisions [1][2] Group 1: Risk Characteristics - Government bonds are issued by national fiscal authorities and are backed by the country's financial capacity, resulting in high credit reliability and low risk levels [1][2] - Corporate bonds are issued by various enterprises, with risk levels directly related to the issuing company's operational status and financial health [1][2] - The probability of default varies significantly, with government bonds having extremely low default risk, while corporate bonds' default risk fluctuates based on the company's performance [2] Group 2: Yield and Investor Suitability - Corporate bonds typically offer higher yields than government bonds, reflecting investors' demand for compensation for additional risks [2] - Government bonds are suitable for investors with lower risk tolerance seeking stable returns, while corporate bonds are more appropriate for investors with risk recognition capabilities who can tolerate moderate risks [2]

Regulatory Actions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued warning letters to three securities firms: Pacific Securities, Zhongtian Guofu Securities, and Caitong Securities due to issues such as inadequate internal controls and improper due diligence in bond underwriting [1] - The Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges released a special notice to standardize investor education regarding general bond repurchase transactions, requiring member units to conduct self-inspections and complete rectifications by April 30, 2026 [3] Monetary Policy - The People's Bank of China (PBOC) conducted a 10 trillion yuan six-month reverse repurchase operation, with a net injection of 5 trillion yuan after 5 trillion yuan matured [6] - The PBOC's January financial statistics report indicated that the total social financing stock was 449.11 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 8.2%, with a net cash injection of 519.1 billion yuan in January [7] Foreign Investment in Bonds - As of the end of January 2026, foreign institutions held 3.35 trillion yuan in the interbank bond market, accounting for approximately 1.9% of the total custody amount, with government bonds making up 59.4% of this holding [9] Local Government Debt Management - The government of Anyang city emphasized the need to monitor local debt comprehensively and to prevent the emergence of new hidden debts, while also addressing overdue payments to enterprises [10] Bond Issuance Activities - Chengfa Group issued its first bond to support small and micro enterprises, raising 400 million yuan at an interest rate of 2.43%, with a subscription multiple of 5.45 times [11] - Beijing State-owned Assets Management Company submitted a registration for a corporate bond issuance of 10 billion yuan [12] - The Linyi City Investment Group and the Weishi County Ronggang Investment Development Company announced plans for their first bond issuances, with amounts of 15 million yuan and 6 million yuan, respectively [15][16] Debt Financing Adjustments - The China Interbank Market Dealers Association announced a reduction of 232.065 billion yuan in debt financing tool quotas for 10 companies, indicating tighter control over corporate debt issuance [16][17] Corporate Leadership Changes - The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) announced personnel changes involving 11 leaders across 14 central enterprises, including appointments and removals [18][19]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - During the period from February 2nd to February 8th, most of the issuance guidance rates announced by the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors increased, with an overall change range of -1 BP to 4 BP. The issuance scale of credit bonds increased month - on - month, corporate bonds remained at zero issuance, the issuance amounts of corporate bonds, medium - term notes, and private placement notes increased, while the issuance amount of commercial paper decreased. The net financing amount of credit bonds increased month - on - month, the net financing amount of commercial paper decreased, the net financing amounts of other varieties increased, and the net financing amount of corporate bonds was negative [1][60]. - In the secondary market, the trading volume of credit bonds continued to decline month - on - month. The trading volume of private placement notes increased, while the trading volumes of other varieties decreased. Most of the yields of credit bonds declined, and most of the credit spreads widened. In terms of quantiles, most of the spreads were at historical lows, and the quantiles of 7 - year varieties were relatively high [1][60]. - From an absolute return perspective, the relatively strong allocation demand will drive the credit bond market to continue its recovery. Although fluctuations and adjustments are inevitable under the influence of both positive and negative factors, the conditions for a comprehensive bear market in credit bonds are still insufficient. In the long run, the yields are still on a downward path, and the idea of increasing allocation during adjustments is still feasible. From a relative return perspective, the compression space of credit spreads at all tenors is insufficient at present, and the cost - effectiveness of most varieties for allocation is not high. The coupon strategy should be cautious in the current allocation thinking, and the trading thinking should be moderately optimistic. The key to bond selection is to keep an eye on the changing trend of interest - rate bonds and pay attention to the coupon value of individual bonds [1][60]. - The central and local governments continue to actively optimize real - estate policies, which have played a positive role in promoting the stabilization of the real - estate market. Although the real - estate market is still in the transition period between old and new models, it is moving towards stabilization. The subsequent policy rhythm and intensity are worth looking forward to. For real - estate bonds, investors with high risk appetite can consider early layout, focusing on enterprises with outstanding new financing and sales recovery, and balancing risks and returns. The focus of allocation is still on central and state - owned enterprises with stable historical valuations and excellent performance, as well as high - quality private enterprise bonds with strong guarantees. They can also appropriately bet on the trading opportunities brought by the valuation repair of bonds of over - sold real - estate enterprises [2][63]. - For urban investment bonds, under the principle of coordinating development and security, the probability of default is very low, and they can still be a key allocation variety for credit bonds. Under the strict supervision of the clearance of local financing platforms, the reform and transformation of financing platforms are accelerating. Opportunities for the reform and transformation of "entity - type" financing platforms can be concerned. With a coupon - oriented approach, appropriate positive actions can be taken. The allocation strategy can give priority to short - to medium - term credit sinking, and the trading strategy can still choose to extend the duration of medium - to high - grade bonds [3][63]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Primary Market Situation 3.1.1 Issuance and Maturity Scale - From February 2nd to February 8th, a total of 440 credit bonds were issued, with an issuance amount of 356.856 billion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 15.70%. The net financing amount of credit bonds was 255.063 billion yuan, an increase of 95.222 billion yuan month - on - month [12]. - By variety, corporate bonds had zero issuance with a net financing amount of - 1.818 billion yuan; corporate bonds issued 190 with an issuance amount of 144.4 billion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 57.73%, and a net financing amount of 122.621 billion yuan; medium - term notes issued 126 with an issuance amount of 110.337 billion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 32.30%, and a net financing amount of 87.862 billion yuan; commercial paper issued 90 with an issuance amount of 81.706 billion yuan, a month - on - month decrease of 31.91%, and a net financing amount of 35.325 billion yuan; private placement notes issued 34 with an issuance amount of 20.413 billion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 51.26%, and a net financing amount of 11.073 billion yuan [13]. 3.1.2 Issuance Interest Rates - Most of the issuance guidance rates announced by the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors increased, with an overall change range of -1 BP to 4 BP. By tenor, the interest rate change range of 1 - year varieties was 0 BP to 3 BP, 3 - year varieties was -1 BP to 3 BP, 5 - year varieties was -1 BP to 4 BP, and 7 - year varieties was -1 BP to 4 BP. By rating, the interest rate change range of key AAA - rated and AAA - rated varieties was -1 BP to 1 BP, AA + - rated varieties was -1 BP to 2 BP, AA - rated varieties was 3 BP to 4 BP, and AA - - rated varieties was 3 BP to 4 BP [14]. 3.2 Secondary Market Situation 3.2.1 Market Trading Volume - From February 2nd to February 8th, the total trading volume of credit bonds was 871.756 billion yuan, a month - on - month decrease of 6.58%. The trading volumes of corporate bonds, corporate bonds, medium - term notes, commercial paper, and private placement notes were 15.904 billion yuan, 354.344 billion yuan, 312.069 billion yuan, 131.161 billion yuan, and 58.278 billion yuan respectively. The trading volume of credit bonds continued to decline month - on - month, the trading volume of private placement notes increased, while the trading volumes of other varieties decreased [17]. 3.2.2 Credit Spreads - For medium - and short - term notes, all varieties' credit spreads widened. For enterprise bonds, most varieties' credit spreads widened, with the spreads of 1 - year AA - rated and AA - - rated, and 3 - year AA - - rated varieties narrowing. For urban investment bonds, most varieties' credit spreads widened, with the spreads of 3 - year AA - - rated, 5 - year AA - rated and AA - - rated varieties narrowing [20][29][37]. 3.2.3 Term Spreads and Rating Spreads - For AA + medium - and short - term notes, the 3Y - 1Y term spread narrowed by 2.69 BP, the 5Y - 3Y spread widened by 1.32 BP, and the 7Y - 3Y spread widened by 1.60 BP. In terms of rating spreads, the 3 - year (AA - )-(AAA) spread remained unchanged, the (AA)-(AAA) spread narrowed by 1.00 BP, and the (AA + )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 1.00 BP [45]. - For AA + enterprise bonds, the 3Y - 1Y term spread widened by 0.84 BP, the 5Y - 3Y spread narrowed by 1.00 BP, and the 7Y - 3Y spread narrowed by 0.73 BP. In terms of rating spreads, the 3 - year (AA - )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 4.00 BP, the (AA)-(AAA) spread narrowed by 1.00 BP, and the (AA + )-(AAA) spread remained unchanged [49]. - For AA + urban investment bonds, the 3Y - 1Y term spread narrowed by 0.83 BP, the 5Y - 3Y spread widened by 0.70 BP, and the 7Y - 3Y spread narrowed by 1.34 BP. In terms of rating spreads, the 3 - year (AA - )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 3.21 BP, the (AA)-(AAA) spread narrowed by 2.01 BP, and the (AA + )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 1.01 BP [52]. 3.3 Credit Rating Adjustment and Default Bond Statistics 3.3.1 Credit Rating Adjustment Statistics - According to iFinD statistics, there were no company rating (including outlook) adjustments during the period from February 2nd to February 8th [57]. 3.3.2 Default and Extended - Maturity Bond Statistics - According to iFinD statistics, there were no defaults or extended - maturity of credit bonds issued by any issuer during the period from February 2nd to February 8th [58]. 3.4 Investment Views - The same as the core views mentioned above, including the analysis of credit bonds, real - estate bonds, and urban investment bonds [1][2][3].

美国银行（Bank of America）指出，美股走弱可能会对债市产生重大风险。策略师表示，如果再平衡资 金流减弱，债市的一个重要需求来源将会萎缩。 本周的市场可能会因就业增长、CPI数据以及大量财报的发布而产生更多火花。 过去几年，美股涨势如虹。但随着道琼斯指数突破50000点大关，向上的动能可能会逐渐消失。对此， 由Eleanor Xiao领导的美国银行利率策略师团队发布了一份有趣的研究报告。他们发现，自2021年以来 的美股上涨为债市带来了大量资金流入，这是由于投资者需要将投资组合重新平衡至所谓的"60/40平衡 型配置"（即60%的股票和40%的债券）。 根据计算，资产每增加10万亿美元，投资组合每月就会卖出约370亿美元的股票，并买入同等金额的固 定收益资产，包括美国国债、企业债和抵押贷款支持证券。 来源：金十数据 美国银行最新报告揭露了一个连锁反应，当美股涨势熄火，竟然会直接引爆债市需求端的结构性"贫 血"！过去5年，那股支撑市场的神秘力量正在悄然撤退…… 本周的市场可能会因就业增长、CPI数据以及大量财报的发布而产生更多火花。 这听起来数额巨大，事实也确实如此。据他们测算，自2021年以来，这 ...

Group 1: Domestic News - The State Council, led by Premier Li Qiang, emphasized the importance of promoting effective investment to stabilize economic growth and enhance development momentum during the 10th plenary meeting on February 6 [2] - The meeting discussed innovative policy measures to optimize the use of central budget investments, ultra-long special bonds, and local government special bonds, focusing on key areas such as infrastructure and emerging industries [2] Group 2: Foreign Exchange and Monetary Policy - As of January 2026, China's foreign exchange reserves increased to $339.91 billion, up by $41.2 billion from December 2025, while gold reserves rose to 74.19 million ounces, an increase of 40,000 ounces [3] - The People's Bank of China conducted a 7-day reverse repo operation of 31.5 billion yuan at a rate of 1.40% and a 14-day reverse repo operation of 300 billion yuan, resulting in a net withdrawal of 146 billion yuan on February 6 [8][9] Group 3: Bond Market Dynamics - The bond market showed positive sentiment with a decline in yields; the 10-year government bond yield fell by 0.60 basis points to 1.8020% and the 10-year policy bank bond yield decreased by 1.55 basis points to 1.9625% [10][11] - The secondary market for credit bonds experienced significant price deviations, with one industrial bond, "23产融11," dropping over 17% [12] Group 4: Equity and Convertible Bond Market - The convertible bond market saw major indices rise, with the China Convertible Bond Index increasing by 0.75% and trading volume reaching 88.755 billion yuan, up by 14.689 billion yuan from the previous trading day [20][21] - Notable individual convertible bonds included 泰瑞转债, which rose over 10%, while 新致转债 fell over 9% [21] Group 5: International Trade Developments - The U.S. and India reached a temporary trade framework, reducing tariffs on Indian goods to 18% and committing to a $500 billion purchase of U.S. products over five years [6] - The U.S. consumer confidence index slightly increased to 57.3 in February 2026, while long-term inflation expectations rose marginally to 3.4% [5]