证 券 研 究 报 告 【债券周报】 逢高配置高票息——信用周报 20250712 信用策略：继续挖掘利差，长端品种等待右侧机会 1、对于负债端稳定性偏弱机构，继续关注 2-3y 中低等级品种，同时重点配置 部分 4-5y 高票息、中等资质个券。对于长久期信用债，配置盘仍可从票息角 度出发积极配置，交易盘参与博弈需等待时机，观察股债翘板扰动过后的机构 配置力量变化，若配置力量有所恢复，可参与右侧机会。 2、对于负债端稳定性较强机构，可发挥负债稳定优势拉久期，积极配置长久 期品种，票息策略优先。当前 7y 隐含评级 AA+品种、10-15y 隐含评级 AA+及 以上品种收益率处于 2.04-2.39%区间内，有票息挖掘空间，可重点关注。 重点政策及热点事件： 1、深圳市龙光控股有限公司公告将对 21 笔债券的本息偿付安排进行调整， 并提供包括全额转换特定资产、资产抵债、现金回购、股票等重组方案选项。 今年以来房企债务重组持续释放积极信号，多家房企债务重组节奏明显加快， 风险出清提速。 2、中国财经报发表文章提及甘肃全力以赴"防爆雷"，设立规模 100 亿元的省 级应急周转资金池，省级财政筹措资金 20 亿元，按 ...

债券研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 【债券月报】 长久期信用债后续如何参与，何时止盈？ ——7 月信用债策略月报 5 月下旬以来信用债挖票息行情向长端演绎，长久期信用债净买入规模明显放 量，市场参与热情较高。去年资产荒行情极致演绎下长久期信用债在同期时点 也走出了独立行情，但去年 8 月后债市波动较大，长久期信用债流动性不足的 风险暴露，估值出现明显调整。今年机构参与长端品种相对谨慎、关注止盈时 点，近期股债翘板效应扰动债市，后续长久期信用债如何参与？ 长久期信用债行情演绎期间机构参与情况如何？ 机构净买入力量是影响长久期信用债行情演绎的重要因素。1）5-7y 中票：去 年长久期信用债行情演绎阶段机构净买入量较前期涨幅较小，但部分时点规模 相对较高，进一步推动了其利差收窄。今年 5 月下旬以来净买入量明显增长， 机构行为对该期限区间的行情驱动较去年或有增强。2）7-10y 中票：基金净买 入力量的波动是影响利差变化的重要因素，两轮长久期信用债行情中基金连续 大规模净买入的同时信用利差也出现快速收窄，而在去年 8 月中下旬基金转 为大规模净卖出，利差开始出现快速大幅走阔。3）10y 以上中票：今年基金参 与力量有 ...

Group 1: Impact of Deposit Rate Cuts on Credit Bonds - The impact of deposit rate cuts on credit bond performance varies; if the cuts lead to a decline in policy rates, credit spreads typically widen, while if they precede rate cuts, spreads may narrow [1][9][10] - Historical analysis shows that after deposit rate cuts, the net buying power for credit bonds from funds and insurance is usually limited, indicating a weak immediate impact [1][15][9] - The short-term influence of deposit rate cuts on credit spreads is primarily driven by market sentiment and conditions rather than direct attribution to the event [1][15][9] Group 2: June Credit Bond Strategy - In June, the demand for credit bonds may weaken marginally, and the momentum for spread narrowing is expected to slow down due to seasonal trends [1][25][28] - The market is anticipated to remain volatile, with institutions focusing on high-yield bonds to potentially drive structural narrowing in credit spreads, although a trend compression is unlikely [1][25][28] - The liquidity environment is expected to be stable, with the central bank showing a strong willingness to support liquidity, which may help mitigate risks of significant capital outflows [1][28][26] Group 3: Sector-Specific Strategies - For urban investment bonds, focus on low-grade bonds within 3 years and medium to high-grade bonds in the 4-5 year range, particularly in regions with strong financial capabilities [2][3] - In the real estate sector, attention should be on AA-rated bonds from central and state-owned enterprises with maturities of 1-2 years, as lower-grade real estate bonds have shown significant spread compression [2][3] - For cyclical bonds, particularly coal and steel, a cautious approach is recommended, with a focus on high-grade issuers to avoid tail risks associated with declining market conditions [2][3]

煤炭 2025 年一季度煤炭债复盘 同步大市-A(维持) 平均期限创新高，市场尚未交易煤炭利差 2025 年 5 月 22 日 行业研究/行业分析 投资要点： 资料来源：最闻 首选股票 评级 【山证煤炭】关税博弈落地，煤炭重回 供 需 逻 辑 - 【 山 证 煤 炭 】 行 业 周 报 （20250512-20250518）： 2025.5.19 【山证煤炭】外需预期主导波动，关注 迎峰度夏需求改善-【山证煤炭】行业周 报（20250505-20250511）： 2025.5.12 分析师： 胡博 执业登记编码：S0760522090003 邮箱：hubo1@sxzq.com 刘贵军 执业登记编码：S0760519110001 邮箱：liuguijun@sxzq.com 请务必阅读最后股票评级说明和免责声明 1 相关报告： 一季度煤价偏弱运行，关注煤炭债交易流动性变化。一季度供 需偏弱，除进口煤偏多之外，需求端表现也相对疲软。随着煤 炭价格连续破位以及行业协会倡议书、平煤集团集体大幅降薪 和晋控集团去库存文件等信号，市场对于煤炭行业的预期已经 发生实质性转变。考虑过去几年煤炭企业的盈利累积，短期风 险可控，因 ...

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the current bond market, short - term credit bond yield decline and spread narrowing space are limited. Traders can wait for a better position after market adjustment to participate in the game, and currently focus on certain coupon opportunities and consider allocation from the perspective of absolute yield [3][27] - Different investment strategies should be adopted according to the stability of the liability side. For those with weak liability - side stability, focus on 2 - 3y medium - and low - grade varieties and some 4 - 5y high - coupon, medium - quality individual bonds; for those with strong liability - side stability, allocate 4 - 5y varieties [3][4][27] Group 3: Summary by Relevant Catalogs I. How to Allocate Credit Bonds after a Significant Narrowing of Spreads (1) Credit Bond Market Review - This week, the capital price was low at first and then high. The Sino - US economic and trade joint statement significantly reduced bilateral tax rates, boosting risk appetite. Under the stock - bond seesaw effect, the bond market was under pressure. Interest - rate bond yields rose across the board, while credit bond yields showed a differentiated trend and performed better than interest - rate bonds. Bank secondary and perpetual bonds with significantly narrowed spreads performed weakly, with yields rising slightly and spreads narrowing passively. The yields of other credit varieties generally declined for 1 - 4y and rose for 5 - 15y, with spreads narrowing significantly for 1 - 4y and passively narrowing for 5 - 15y, with a smaller narrowing amplitude at the long end [1][11] (2) Credit Strategy: Focus on Certain Coupon Opportunities - **Current Credit Spread Level**: 1 - 2y variety spreads have been compressed to an extreme level, while the medium - and long - term spreads still have some room compared to last year's lowest point. In a volatile bond market environment, the further compression space of credit spreads may be relatively limited [14][24] - **Current Credit Bond Yield Level**: Currently, the yields of various credit varieties can generally achieve positive carry. Different varieties have different yield levels compared to R007 [25] II. Key Policies and Hot Events - On May 15th, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee issued the "Opinions on Continuously Promoting Urban Renewal Actions", which mentioned improving diversified investment and financing methods and encouraging financial institutions to participate in urban renewal [33] - On May 15th, Vanke announced that its major shareholder, Shenzhen Metro Group, would provide a loan of up to 1.552 billion yuan to the company to repay the principal and interest of bonds issued in the public market [33] - On May 13th, seven departments jointly issued policies to include high - quality enterprise science and technology innovation bonds in the benchmark market - making varieties to improve their liquidity [34] III. Secondary Market - This week, credit bond yields showed a differentiated trend, and credit spreads generally narrowed. Different types of bonds, such as urban investment bonds, real - estate bonds, cyclical bonds, and financial bonds, had different yield and spread changes [36][37] IV. Primary Market - This week, the issuance scale of credit bonds was 122.3 billion yuan, a decrease of 47.5 billion yuan compared to the previous week, and the net financing amount was - 15.7 billion yuan, a decrease of 19.7 billion yuan compared to the previous week. The issuance scale of urban investment bonds was 30.2 billion yuan, a decrease of 50.9 billion yuan compared to the previous week, and the net financing amount was - 24.6 billion yuan, a decrease of 5.4 billion yuan compared to the previous week [6] V. Trading Liquidity - This week, the trading activity in the inter - bank market and the exchange market of credit bonds increased. The trading volume in the inter - bank market increased from 432 billion yuan last week to 550.1 billion yuan, and the trading volume in the exchange market increased from 234.1 billion yuan last week to 336.2 billion yuan [6] VI. Rating Adjustment - This week, there were 2 entities with downgraded ratings and 3 entities with upgraded ratings [6]

债券研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 【债券月报】 回归基本面，信用债如何配置？ ——5 月信用债策略月报 1、城投债方面，关注 3y 以内低等级与 4-5y 中高等级投资机会。对江苏、浙 江等区域，综合实力较强、存量债券余额较多，叠加化债利好保护，可在 3y 以内下沉至 AA-品种；四川、山东、河南、湖南、湖北等地可在 2y 以内下沉 至 AA-品种，天津、重庆等区域可在 2y 以内下沉至 AA(2)品种。 2、地产债方面，关注 1-2y 央国企地产 AA 及以上品种。从板块比价来看，当 前地产债收益率具有一定吸引力，1-2yAA 品种利差在 88-98BP。4 月国务院常 务会议指出要持续稳定股市，政治局会议指出持续巩固房地产市场稳定态势， 后续仍可关注 1-2y 央国企地产 AA 及以上品种机会。但行业信用风险尚未出 清，景气度预计仍偏低，低等级主体谨慎下沉。 3、周期债方面，煤炭债短端下沉、中高等级拉久期至 3y，钢铁债规避尾部风 险。对短期风险可控的隐含评级 AA 煤企 1-2y 品种适当下沉，中高等级可拉 长久期至 3y。今年以来动力煤供需两弱，煤炭价格持续下跌，关注煤价止跌 回稳情况，若景气度持续下 ...