截至 7 月 4 日，二级资本债重仓策略显著修复，二级债子弹型、产业超长型策略周度收益趋近于近三个月最高。信用 风格二级资本债重仓组合收益均值回升 28bp 至 0.27%附近，其中，久期及混合哑铃型策略修复力度较大。超长债重仓 策略平均收益则出现 38bp 左右的大幅回升，二季度产业、二级超长型策略累计收益不及城投超长型，而本周收益几 乎位于近三个月最高点。超长端策略超额收益回升至 6 月初水平，近期久期策略从城投轮动至产业、二级债品种，特 别是上周二级超长型策略组合超额升至 17bp 以上，与此前连续三周的负项读数形成对比。 一般商金债久期从上周 2.1 年快速拉长至本周 3.3 年，逼近历史最高水平。截至 7 月 4 日，城投债、产业债成交期限 分别加权于 2.27 年、3.27 年，均处于 2021 年 3 月以来 90%以上分位数水平，商业银行债中，二级资本债、银行永续 债以及一般商金债加权平均成交期限分别为 4.28 年、3.73 年、3.27 年，其中银行永续债处于较低历史水平；从其余 金融债来看，证券公司债、证券次级债、保险公司债、租赁公司债久期分别为 1.52 年、1.69 年、3.33 年 ...

市场的加速器——信用债 ETF 的影响 今日概览 ◼ 重磅研报 【固定收益】市场的加速器——信用债 ETF 的影响——20250710 【海外】禾赛（HSAI.O）-赋能机器，感知世界——20250710 ◼ 研究视点 【电力设备】大金重工（002487.SZ）-业绩超预期，海风盈利提升—— 20250710 证券研究报告 | 朝闻国盛 gszqdatemark 2025 07 11 年 月 日 朝闻国盛 作者 | 分析师 张斌梅 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 执业证书编号：S0680523070007 | | | | | 邮箱：zhangbinmei@gszq.com | | | | | 行业表现前五名 | | | | | 行业 | 1 月 | 3 月 | 1 年 | | 综合 | 9.8% | 19.7% | 72.9% | | 通信 | 9.0% | 22.7% | 33.3% | | 电力设备 | 8.7% | 15.5% | 31.8% | | 银行 | 8.4% | 20.4% | 36.5% | | 非银金融 | 7.9% | 14.0% | 47.2% ...

Group 1: Northbound Capital Analysis - In Q2 2025, Northbound capital actively increased positions in both traditional economy sectors and new tracks, with significant additions in non-ferrous metals, transportation, public utilities, non-bank financials, and construction decoration [2][22] - Major reductions were observed in food and beverage, home appliances, and machinery sectors, indicating a shift from core assets to traditional economy and from old tracks to new tracks [2][22] - The absolute holding amounts showed significant decreases for companies like BOE A (-38.39%), Luxshare Precision (-38.29%), and Wuliangye (-30.22%) [23][24] Group 2: Dollar Outlook - The report suggests that the downtrend of the dollar is expected to continue at least until mid-2025, with recent upticks being merely a "rebound" rather than a "reversal" [3][29] - Factors contributing to the dollar's decline include deteriorating U.S. fiscal conditions and a loss of attractiveness as a global reserve currency [3][27] - The report anticipates a potential rebound in Q3 2025, but maintains that the overall downtrend remains dominant [29] Group 3: Credit Bond ETF Strategy - Since May, the credit bond market has exhibited independent trends, driven by rapid growth in credit bond ETF scales and expectations for future space [4][30] - The trading activity of component bonds has significantly increased, with higher turnover rates compared to non-component bonds [30][31] - The report indicates that the valuation of component bonds may further compress, with potential trading opportunities in non-component bonds due to liquidity premiums [32] Group 4: Company-Specific Insights - Daikin Heavy Industries is positioned as the only supplier in the Asia-Pacific region capable of delivering offshore products to the European market, with a strong order backlog [11][35] - The company has transitioned to a DAP (Delivered at Place) product model, enhancing its service offerings and increasing order value [11][35] - Revenue projections for Daikin Heavy Industries are set at 6.51 billion, 8.40 billion, and 9.74 billion yuan for 2025-2027, with net profit estimates adjusted to 1.05 billion, 1.37 billion, and 1.76 billion yuan respectively [11][36] Group 5: Chemical Industry Analysis - Xin'an Chemical is recognized as a leading player in the glyphosate and silicone markets, with expectations for improved market conditions in the silicone sector [12][20] - The company has a glyphosate production capacity of 80,000 tons and is expanding its product range under a "1+2+N" strategy [12][20] - Revenue forecasts for Xin'an Chemical are projected at 15.5 billion, 17.3 billion, and 18.8 billion yuan for 2025-2027, with net profits expected to reach 299 million, 651 million, and 802 million yuan [12][20]

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content found Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - As of July 7, 2025, the valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise real estate bonds and industrial bonds in the outstanding credit bonds are generally higher than those of other varieties. Compared with last week, the yields of non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds and real estate bonds have generally declined, and the short - end varieties of non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds have a larger decline. Among them, the 1 - 2 - year public and 1 - year private non - perpetual bonds of private enterprises have declined by 19.6BP and 14.2BP respectively. The 2 - year private enterprise real estate bonds are more popular [3][8]. - In financial bonds, the varieties with high valuation yields and spreads include urban and rural commercial bank capital supplementary tools and leasing company bonds. Compared with last week, the yields of financial bonds have generally declined. For example, the yields of 3 - 5 - year non - perpetual leasing bonds have declined by more than 8.5BP, and the yields of 1 - year joint - stock bank secondary perpetual bonds have declined by nearly 13BP [4][8]. - In public offering urban investment bonds, the weighted average valuation yields of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces are both below 2.3%. The urban investment bonds with yields exceeding 4.5% are in prefecture - level cities and districts and counties of Guizhou. The spreads in Yunnan, Gansu and other regions are also relatively high. Compared with last week, the yields of public offering urban investment bonds have basically declined, and the average yield of varieties within 1 year has declined by 11.5BP [2][16]. - In private placement urban investment bonds, the weighted average valuation yields of coastal provinces such as Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Fujian are below 2.7%. The varieties with yields higher than 4% appear in prefecture - level cities of Guizhou and Shaanxi. The spreads in Yunnan, Gansu, Heilongjiang and other regions are also relatively high. Compared with last week, the yields of private placement urban investment bonds have mainly declined [2]. Group 3: Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 1. Overall Outstanding Credit Bonds - The weighted average valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise real estate bonds and industrial bonds are generally higher than those of other varieties. The yields of non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds and real estate bonds have generally declined, and the short - end varieties of non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds have a larger decline. The yields of financial bonds have also generally declined [3][4][8]. - The data in the table shows the weighted average valuation yields, spreads, and their changes compared with last week of different types of bonds (including urban investment bonds, non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds, real estate bonds, financial bonds, etc.) under different issuance methods (public offering and private placement) and different maturities [9][12][13]. 2. Public Offering Urban Investment Bonds - The weighted average valuation yields of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces are below 2.3%, while those in Guizhou's prefecture - level cities and districts and counties exceed 4.5%. The spreads in Yunnan, Gansu and other regions are relatively high. The yields have basically declined compared with last week, and the 1 - year varieties have an average decline of 11.5BP. The varieties with a large decline in yields include 1 - year non - perpetual bonds of Jiangsu provincial level, 1 - year perpetual bonds of Hebei provincial level, etc. [2][16]. - The table shows the weighted average valuation yields, spreads, and their changes compared with last week of public offering urban investment bonds at different administrative levels in various regions [17][19][21]. 3. Private Placement Urban Investment Bonds - The weighted average valuation yields of coastal provinces such as Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Fujian are below 2.7%. The varieties with yields higher than 4% appear in prefecture - level cities of Guizhou and Shaanxi. The spreads in Yunnan, Gansu, Heilongjiang and other regions are relatively high. The yields have mainly declined compared with last week, and the varieties with a large decline in yields include 1 - year perpetual bonds of Shandong district and county level, etc. [2]. - The table shows the weighted average valuation yields, spreads of private placement urban investment bonds at different administrative levels in various regions [25][28].

截至2025年7月8日 14:49，信用债ETF博时(159396)多空胶着，最新报价101.32元。拉长时间看，截至2025年7月7日，信用债ETF博时近1周累计上涨0.26%， 涨幅排名可比基金1/4。 数据显示，杠杆资金持续布局中。信用债ETF博时连续3天获杠杆资金净买入，最高单日获得147.63万元净买入，最新融资余额达15.23万元。 从收益能力看，截至2025年7月7日，信用债ETF博时自成立以来，最长连涨月数为4个月，涨跌月数比为4/1，月盈利百分比为80.00%，月盈利概率为 73.96%，历史持有3个月盈利概率为100.00%。 截至2025年7月4日，信用债ETF博时近1个月夏普比率为1.63，排名可比基金前2/4，同等风险下收益更高。 回撤方面，截至2025年7月7日，信用债ETF博时成立以来最大回撤0.89%，相对基准回撤0.10%。回撤后修复天数为26天。 费率方面，信用债ETF博时管理费率为0.15%，托管费率为0.05%，费率在可比基金中最低。 流动性方面，信用债ETF博时盘中换手74.67%，成交95.62亿元，市场交投活跃。拉长时间看，截至7月7日，信用债ETF博时近1周日均 ...

新华财经上海7月7日电（记者杨溢仁）首批科创债ETF如约而至，首批10只科创债ETF于7日正式发 售。作为资本市场服务科技创新的又一重要里程碑，该创新产品填补了科技金融债券基金领域的空白。 分析人士认为，首批科创债ETF为保守投资者提供了低波动参与科技赛道的新工具，鉴于其兼具高流动 性与低信用风险的突出优势，有望成为投资者在利率震荡期的稳健选择。 科创债ETF如约而至 6月18日，10家公募基金集中申报首批科创债ETF，10只科创债ETF于7月2日获批，7月7日正式发售。 其中，6只跟踪中证AAA科技创新公司债指数，3只跟踪上证AAA科技创新公司债指数，1只跟踪深证 AAA科技创新公司债指数。 科创债ETF缘何能够斩获业界高度关注？分析人士认为，除了政策红利的"加持"外，答案藏在两个关键 词内——即"稳健"和"聪明钱"，市场热度居高不下的背后，是机构和个人投资者资产配置需求的提升。 "一方面，在全球经济增速放缓、利率中枢持续下行的环境中，传统理财产品收益率也在持续下滑；另 一方面，关税和贸易的摩擦升级，让不确定因素增加，全球风险资产的波动显著加大。"一位券商固收 部门负责人告诉记者，"在此背景下，越来越多的投 ...

"中证科创债ETF易方达等科创债ETF可以为投资者一键布局交易所高等级科创债提供便捷工具。"据李 一硕介绍，科创债ETF采取组合投资方式，可以降低投资单一债券的信用风险；同时科创债ETF在交易 所上市交易，有做市商提供流动性服务，可以降低交易成本和难度；较低的交易门槛，让资金量较少的 投资者也能参与科创债投资；此外，科创债ETF在场内实时交易可以为市场提供价格参考，增强透明 度。 今年以来，随着公司债ETF易方达（511110）等首批基准做市公司债ETF推出、信用债ETF试点开展通 用质押式回购业务等配套措施不断完善，信用债ETF扩容并迎显著增量资金。数据显示，截至7月3日， 信用债ETF年内净流入超1400亿元，最新规模已超2200亿元，在债券ETF中占比超一半。业内人士认 为，此次科创债ETF推出，将进一步丰富信用债ETF产品类型，为投资者提供更加多元的场内债券投资 工具，同时其高度聚焦的投资主题设计，将助力投资者分享科创企业发展红利。 信用债ETF再添新品。7月7日，中证科创债ETF易方达（基金全称：易方达中证AAA科技创新公司债 ETF，认购代码：551503）等首批科创债ETF启动发行。这是继公司债 ...

固定收益 | 动态跟踪 7 月挖掘机会在"小众" 信用债市场周观察 研究结论 风险提示 政策变化超预期；货币政策变化超预期；经济基本面变化超预期；信用风险暴露超预 期；数据统计可能存在遗误 | 信用债市场周观察 | | --- | | 齐晟 | qisheng@orientsec.com.cn | | --- | --- | | | 执业证书编号：S0860521120001 | | 杜林 | dulin@orientsec.com.cn | | | 执业证书编号：S0860522080004 | | 王静颖 | wangjingying@orientsec.com.cn | | | 执业证书编号：S0860523080003 | | 徐沛翔 | xupeixiang@orientsec.com.cn | ⚫ 信用债周观点：7 月挖掘机会隐藏在小众的品种、小众的期限、小众的主体当中。 回顾 6 月信用债行情，短端下沉依然是稳定的策略，高等级难有超额但低等级被持 续挖掘，保持中等久期还可获得可观资本利得。目前低等级 1Y 已经逼近乃至刷新近 一年低点，但 5Y 相比于去年 7~8 月还有 10bp 左右空间。7 ...

拾级而上 持续迭代固收投资框架 广发基金陈韫慧： 拾级而上 持续迭代固收投资框架 ◎记者 聂林浩 深耕固定收益投资的基金经理不少，但横跨券商资管、银行理财与公募基金三大领域的资深固收投资人 仍是少数，广发基金债券投资部基金经理陈韫慧正是其中一位。 在券商资管工作的近十年里，陈韫慧建立了自下而上选券、主动寻找资产的敏锐触角，磨砺出对信用债 的甄别能力。"券商具有投行基因，从中观和微观中捕捉阿尔法的驱动力更强。"她表示，"投行文化赋 予的是主动出击的精神内核——不是被动等待机会出现，而是积极寻找被低估的价值洼地。" 加入平安理财后，面对千亿元规模的资金运作管理，陈韫慧开始自上而下深入研究不同风险等级资金与 投资品种的适配性，紧盯一二级市场动态，积极参与交易，极大完善了投资交易框架。由于理财子客户 对风险控制和绝对收益要求极高，她将风险控制作为投资核心，不断思考如何在可控的波动下实现更有 性价比的收益。 她将在这一阶段的成长总结为两个方面：一是强化头寸管理能力。发挥研究出身的优势，左侧捕捉交易 机会，实现从"发现机会"到"管理头寸"的闭环，在体系化、精细化操作中拓展规模管理边界。二是深化 风险收益比认知。跳出单纯关 ...

证券研究报告 固收点评报告 hyzqdatemark 2025 年 07 月 06 日 信用债 ETF 性价比几何？ ——信用债热点事件系列 投资要点： 目前，首批 10 只科创债 ETF 集中获批待上市，科创债 ETF 自身的稀缺性以及市场 对科创债自今年 5 月份主体扩容以来的高度关注，年初以来的信用债 ETF 快速扩容 的行情或有可能在科创债 ETF 上再度演绎，相关成分券的利差压缩空间或可期待。 结构性的机会上，我们建议投资者结合负债端属性以及交易风格，通过适度下沉和 拉长久期等方式提前布局成分券中的科创债，并抢配同为 8 只信用债 ETF 成分券的 非可续期科创债。 风险提示：1）数据来源和数据处理偏误风险：本文数据主要来自于同花顺 ifind 等， 证券分析师 廖志明 SAC：S1350524100002 liaozhiming@huayuanstock.com 1.基准做市信用债 ETF 快速扩容 今年年初以来持续的低利率环境下，信用债相比之下具有较高的板块贝塔，中等期限信 用债具有明显的静态票息优势，市场对信用债 ETF 的关注度明显提升。2025 年初以前，市 场上仅有 3 只信用债 ETF ...