投资咨询业务资格：证监许可【2011】1778 号 晨会纪要 宝城期货橡胶早报-2025-05-19 品种晨会纪要 2.跌幅大于 1%为下跌，跌幅 0~1%为震荡偏弱，涨幅 0~1%为震荡偏强，涨幅大于 1%为上涨。 3.震荡偏强/偏弱只针对日内观点，短期和中期不做区分。 主要品种价格行情驱动逻辑—商品期货能源化工板块 沪胶（RU） 时间周期说明：短期为一周以内、中期为两周至一月 | 品种 | | 短期 | 中期 | 日内 | 观点参考 | 核心逻辑概要 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 沪胶 | 2509 | 震荡 | 震荡 | 震荡 偏弱 | 偏弱运行 | 偏空因素主导，沪胶震荡偏弱 | | 合成胶 | 2507 | 震荡 | 震荡 | 震荡 偏弱 | 偏弱运行 | 偏空因素主导，合成胶震荡偏弱 | 备注： 1.有夜盘的品种以夜盘收盘价为起始价格，无夜盘的品种以昨日收盘价为起始价格，当日日盘收盘 价为终点价格，计算涨跌幅度。 日内观点：震荡偏弱 中期观点：震荡 参考观点：偏弱运行 核心逻辑：随着宏观因子出现改善，胶市做多信心得到提振。不过面对国 ...

第二件事，某方在阿联酋宣布不会与各国逐一谈判关税，只会与有必要的贸易伙伴主动寻求进一步关税 协议的落定。这表明其更重视有实力的对手。在90天豁免期内，该方与其他地区会达成何种协定尚不可 知，但双方目前相当于各退一步，预计6月份美债到期前应无大碍，不过6月份之后情况难以预料。此 外，截至目前，樱花国是美债第一持有大国，英国排第二，我国排第三，3月份我国又减持了187亿美 债，已连续18个月减持。 指数层面，上证指数突破3400点、走出下降通道后正常回踩，目前压力位仍在3400点上方，约3416 - 3417点附近，支撑位在3350点。下周可重点关注。操作上，可借鉴主力"开超市"的做法，在涨幅榜前露 过脸的板块中选2 - 3个逢低布局，进行批次轮动。 （原标题：和讯投顾徐梦婧：A股迎来重磅利好，压力位仍在3400点上方） 5月18日，和讯投顾徐梦婧提到，周末有几件重磅大事。第一件是A股迎来重磅利好，上市公司重大资 产重组新规落地。此次修订松绑力度较大，创下多个首次，如首次建立简易审核程序、首次调整发行股 份购买资产监管要求、首次建立分期支付机制，最大亮点是允许私募参与并购重组，且为鼓励其积极性 缩短了锁定期。若后 ...

我写《美债又崩了》，有粉丝质疑，美联储不是美国的吗？为什么要拆自己的台？ 问这种问题的人，真的是天真的可爱。 你不妨往自己身边看看，好多人一家子两夫妻，处得跟仇人一样，为了财产或者别的，勉强凑一块，心 底里各种算计，恨不得把对方弄死的多了去了。你别问，一问户口本上一家人，真要是谁死了，剩下的 那个，就占大便宜了。 所以懂王跟美联储之间彼此不对付有那么难理解吗？ 这世界上什么都可以让，唯有利益是不能让的。 懂王独享欲非常强，当了两届总统，你啥时候见他有过什么亲密的政治盟友？谁跟他关系好，都只能是 用得上的那一阵子，但凡用不上了，即便像马老板这样，出钱出力把他送上总统宝座，那也是随时能欢 送出白宫的。 从懂王的第一任期开始，建制派们就已经想好了要联手限制总统的权力。 当然了，这也不是建制派们跟懂王有什么深仇大恨，纯粹是美国的政治传统。 我们以前经常听公知们说，要把权力关进笼子里。 后来我们慢慢发现，权力世袭真的很难，但财富世袭却是容易的。把权力关进笼子里限制起来，然后让 财富自由，这不就相当于让财富控制了权力，然后世袭罔替仙福永享了吗？ 以前总有人说，谁当美国总统都是一样的，就是让个动物当总统，美国照样运转。 这 ...

固定收益 | 证券研究报告 — 周报 2025 年 5 月 18 日 相关研究报告 《美债与美国自然利率》20230402 《加息尾声的美元反弹》20230521 《关注货币活性下降》20230813 《美债利率上行遇阻》20231029 《如何看待美债利率回落》20231105 《中债收益率曲线已较为平坦》20231112 《如何看待美债长期利率触顶》20231122 《联储表态温和、降息预期高涨》20231214 《"平坦化"存款降息》20231217 《长期利率或将度过快速下行阶段》20231231 《房贷利率仍是长期利率焦点》20240225 《利率债与房地产的均衡分析》20240331 《新旧动能与利率定价》20240407 《美联储能否实现"软着陆"?》20240602 《当前影响利率的财政因素》20240630 《中性利率成为关键》20240922 《如何看中美长债对降息的反应》20240929 《美国经济看点：AI 浪潮与家庭债务》20241103 《特朗普交易：预期与预期之外》20241124 《提前开始关税叫价？》20241207 《低通胀惯性仍是主要矛盾》20250105 《如何看待美国 ...

Group 1 - The recent significant fluctuations in U.S. Treasury yields were primarily triggered by unexpected tariff policies announced by President Trump, leading to a sharp decline and subsequent rise in yields over three distinct phases from March 28 to April 24 [1][20][15] - The first phase saw a decline in yields due to concerns over a potential global economic recession, with 2Y and 10Y Treasury yields dropping by 29 basis points (bps) and 37 bps respectively [20] - The second phase experienced a rapid increase in yields, with 2Y yields rising by 28 bps and 10Y and 30Y yields increasing by 47 bps and 44 bps respectively, marking the largest weekly increases since the tech bubble burst in 2001 and the economic crisis in 1982 [20][15] Group 2 - The recent auction of new U.S. Treasuries faced weak demand, with the 3-year Treasury auction showing the highest tailing spread since the pandemic and the lowest bid-to-cover ratio in nearly three years, raising concerns about demand and liquidity [2][26] - Hedge funds faced significant pressure to close basis trades, leading to substantial selling pressure in the U.S., Europe, and Japan, as the volatility in Treasury futures prices forced traders to liquidate positions [3][29] - Confidence in U.S. dollar assets as a safe haven was undermined, resulting in a simultaneous decline in U.S. equities, bonds, and the dollar, while non-U.S. assets like Japanese and European bonds, as well as gold, benefited from this shift [4][33] Group 3 - Historical analysis shows that since 2007, there have been six significant fluctuations in U.S. Treasury yields, with the first two linked to crises that drove investors to seek safety in Treasuries, resulting in substantial declines in yields [5][40] - The most recent fluctuations in 2020 and 2023 exhibited a similar pattern of initial declines followed by increases, influenced by liquidity crises and strong economic data [5][40] Group 4 - Short-term outlook for U.S. Treasury yields indicates narrow fluctuations with high market vulnerability due to multiple factors, including uncertainties surrounding tariff negotiations and the potential for further volatility in financial markets [6][46] - The medium to long-term outlook suggests a return to a downward trend in yields, contingent on easing tariff uncertainties and a potential resumption of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, although concerns over debt sustainability and geopolitical tensions may elevate yield volatility [10][11]

Group 1: U.S. Treasury Holdings Overview - As of March, foreign countries and regions held $90,495 billion in U.S. Treasury securities, with a month-over-month increase of $2,331 billion [1] - Japan remains the largest foreign holder of U.S. debt, increasing its holdings by $49 billion to $1,130.8 billion, marking the third consecutive month of increases [1][7] - China reduced its holdings by $189 billion, bringing its total to $765.4 billion, the lowest level since 2009 [2][5] Group 2: Changes in Major Holders - The United Kingdom increased its U.S. Treasury holdings by $289 billion to $779.3 billion, surpassing China to become the second-largest holder [2][6] - In March, total net inflows into U.S. securities and bank cash from overseas reached $2,543 billion, with private funds contributing $2,592 billion and official funds experiencing a net outflow of $49 billion [3][4] Group 3: Investment Trends and Motivations - In March, overseas net purchases of U.S. long-term securities amounted to $1,832 billion, with private investors net buying $1,460 billion and official institutions net buying $373 billion [4] - Japan's motivations for increasing its U.S. Treasury holdings include currency intervention, leveraging its holdings in trade negotiations, and adjustments in monetary policy [8][9][10] Group 4: U.S. Fiscal Challenges - Moody's downgraded the U.S. sovereign credit rating from Aaa to Aa1, citing increasing budget deficits and rising costs of debt refinancing under high interest rates [13][14] - The U.S. federal debt has surpassed $36 trillion, with a fiscal deficit exceeding $1.3 trillion in the first half of the fiscal year, marking the second-highest deficit on record [17]

近期，国际金融市场关于美国国债安全性的讨论持续升温。中国内地连续减持美债的动向与穆迪下调美国主权信用评级的举动，引发市场对美债违约风险的 广泛关注。然而，透过现象观察本质，当前美债市场虽面临结构性挑战，但爆发系统性违约的可能性仍极低，其作为全球核心安全资产的地位短期内难以撼 动。 中国持有的美债规模演变折射出全球资本流动的新特征。自2013年达到1.3万亿美元峰值后，中国持有的美债余额持续震荡下行，2025年3月再减持189亿美 元，持仓额已降至7654亿美元，十年间累计减持规模超四成。 当前市场流传的"6.6万亿美元美债集中到期"传言，经查证存在明显数据失真。 通过美国财政部官方债务管理平台可清晰看到，2025年6月到期美债共计22笔，总额1.45万亿美元，其中短期国债占比超八成。这种债务结构特征，恰恰凸 显美债市场的流动性优势。 所谓的6.6万亿美元美债在6月到期纯属无稽之谈，是国内自媒体为了营造美债要还不出的虚假景象而胡编乱造的、毫无事实依据的数字。 | Loan Description | | | Issue Date | | Interest | | Amount in Millions of Do ...

风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者： Thomas说港股 来源：雪球 继2011年8月，2023年8月之后，今天美国的信用评级再次被下调，这是美国第三次被下调信用评级。 信用评级被下调会发生什么？且听我一一道来。 02 信用评级是什么 信用评级（Credit rating）是由专业机构（如标准普尔、穆迪、惠誉）对债务人履行债务能力的评价。 01 引子 家人们，一觉醒来，美国又变天了啊！美国的主权信用评级被下调了。 首先，我给大家科普一下信用评级是什么？有什么用？ 信用评级也就是给你的信用状况打分。说白了，你可以理解为花呗的芝麻信用分。如果你信用好，经常按时 还花呗，那么你的芝麻信用分会比较高；如果你信用不好，不按时还款或者不还花呗，那么你的信用分就会 比较低。 美国三大信用评级机构标准普尔、穆迪、惠誉，有各自的评分系统。把不同信用的主体划分成ABC(D)类。 其中AAA/Aaa是最高分，如图： | 惠普 | 標普 | 穆迪 | 評級描述(穆迪) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | AAA | AAA | Aaa | 信貸風險微不足 ...

Group 1 - The recent performance of gold has been disappointing due to rising optimism in trade, leading investors to withdraw from the gold market, with prices hitting a near one-month low on May 15 [1] - Some investors are taking advantage of the lower prices to gradually increase their positions, while those who entered at higher prices are experiencing negative returns [2][3] - Despite the decline in gold prices, many jewelry stores are still seeing a lack of customer activity, indicating a mixed sentiment in the market [3] Group 2 - The underlying logic supporting gold's rise remains intact, with several institutions maintaining a positive long-term outlook for gold despite short-term fluctuations [5] - The decrease in risk aversion has weakened support for gold prices, but the ongoing purchases of gold by central banks in emerging markets and unresolved issues with U.S. debt continue to provide a foundation for gold's value [5] - Analysts suggest that the current adjustment in gold prices could be viewed as a necessary correction following a significant rise from December 2019 to April 2020, and this adjustment may take several weeks to conclude [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent downgrade of the United States' credit rating by Moody's, marking the first time all three major credit rating agencies have downgraded the U.S. from its previous AAA status due to rising government debt and fiscal challenges [1][2]. Group 1: Credit Rating Downgrade - Moody's has downgraded the U.S. sovereign credit rating from Aaa to Aa1, with a stable outlook, following similar actions by S&P and Fitch [1][2]. - The downgrade is primarily attributed to increasing government debt and the rising proportion of interest payments relative to revenue [2][5]. Group 2: Fiscal Deficits and Debt Levels - The U.S. fiscal deficit has approached $2 trillion annually, with total nominal debt exceeding $36 trillion, representing over 6% of GDP, which is the highest in peacetime history [2][5]. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary acknowledged that the country is on an unsustainable fiscal path, with projections indicating that the federal deficit could reach nearly 9% of GDP by 2035 [5][7]. Group 3: Rising Interest Costs - High interest rates have led to increased debt servicing costs, with net interest expenditures expected to rise by approximately 130% by 2024 compared to 2019 levels [5][8]. - The average interest rate on outstanding U.S. debt is projected to be 3.324% in 2024, with total debt burden reaching 98% of GDP [5][8]. Group 4: Economic Implications - The trade war initiated by Trump has resulted in weakened economic conditions, leading to decreased consumer spending and increased corporate costs, which in turn affects government revenue and debt repayment capacity [8][11]. - The Yale Budget Lab estimates that proposed tax legislation could increase government debt by $3.4 trillion over the next decade, potentially reaching $5 trillion if certain temporary provisions are extended [8][12]. Group 5: Market Reactions - Following the downgrade announcement, the S&P 500 index ETF experienced a decline of over 1%, while the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond rose from 4.44% to above 4.48% [13][15]. - The article suggests that rising bond yields could lead to increased pressure on the U.S. government to address fiscal challenges, potentially impacting future economic policies [15].