7 月份，投资者们纷纷涌入美国股市，使得标普500指数在一个月内创下了10次历史新高，但有一个重 要的群体却与他们背道而驰：企业高管们。据Washington Service收集的数据，上个月仅在151家标普500 指数成分公司中，有内部人员自行购入了公司股票，这一数字是至少自2018年以来的最低水平。尽管企 业内部人员在7月份的抛售行为较6月份有所放缓，但购入量的下降幅度更大，使得购销比达到了一年来 的最低水平。 与市场情绪分化 高管们的偏好下降是在股市上涨势头似乎逐渐减弱之时发生的，甚至在周五的抛售之前就已经如此。在 经历了6月份5%的涨幅和5月份6.2%的涨幅之后，标准普尔500指数在7月份上涨了2.2%。不过，这三个 月的上涨行情突然使得标普500指数估值过高，其市盈率已接近23倍(远高于10年平均值约18倍)。 因此，企业领导层采取谨慎态度(因为他们最了解自己的企业状况)这一现象，可能表明他们对自身市场 估值存在担忧，同时也担心特朗普总统实施的全面全球关税政策会对公司业绩造成负面影响。 Roundhill Investments首席执行官Dave Mazza表示："目前，企业高管们的行事方式与机构投 ...

Group 1 - The market sentiment index has risen to 3.2, up from 1.8 the previous week, indicating a bullish outlook, but caution is advised as high sentiment levels can lead to sensitive directional changes [10][4][8] - The price-volume consistency indicator has increased, suggesting higher capital activity and reduced divergence in market sentiment, while the financing ratio continues to decline [13][4] - The total trading volume for the week remained high, with the peak on Thursday at 1961.849 billion RMB and a significant drop on Friday to 1619.884 billion RMB [17][4] Group 2 - The industry performance shows a clear upward trend in anti-involution related sectors, with basic chemicals and electronics leading the gains, while automotive, environmental, and oil sectors lag behind [26][29] - The short-term scores for most industries have generally decreased, with computer, media, communication, and food and beverage sectors showing slight increases [33][34] - The model indicates a preference for small-cap growth styles, with the RSI model also suggesting a growth style advantage, although the 5-day RSI has decreased compared to the 20-day RSI [36][37]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no relevant content provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - This week, the inventory of the five major steel products increased by 153,900 tons to 1.35189 million tons, ending a four - week decline and reaching a seven - week high. The social inventory increased by 153,900 tons, and the steel mill inventory increased slightly by 1,000 tons. Specifically, the social inventory of rebar increased by 111,700 tons, while the steel mill inventory decreased by 35,200 tons. The weekly output decreased slightly, and the apparent demand decreased by 6.08% or 131,700 tons to 2.0341 million tons, the lowest in five months. The output increase of hot - rolled coils was greater than the inventory increase, and the apparent demand rebounded by 47,600 tons to 3.2 million tons. The apparent demand for cold - rolled and medium - thick plates fluctuated relatively little [2]. - Currently, the proportion of industrial logic is gradually increasing, and policy expectations are decreasing. After important events such as Sino - US tariff negotiations, the Politburo meeting, and the US interest - rate meeting have concluded, market sentiment has significantly cooled. In the short term, prices have entered a period of volatile consolidation, but the upward trend is expected to remain unchanged, although the momentum has slowed. In the later stage, attention should be paid to whether terminal demand can show better - than - expected performance [2]. - In the short term, the market will experience volatile consolidation, while in the long term, the upward trend remains unchanged [2]. 3. Summary According to the Catalog 3.1 Market Review and Price Performance 3.1.1 Futures and Spot Trend Review - Futures market: This week, the main RB2510 rebar contract retraced, closing at 3,205 yuan/ton, a week - on - week decrease of 89 yuan/ton, with a position of 1.816 million lots, a decrease of 90,000 lots. The main HC2510 hot - rolled coil contract slightly retraced, closing at 33,902 yuan/ton, a week - on - week decrease of 66 yuan/ton, with a position of 1.4339 million lots, a decrease of 73,800 lots [5]. - Spot market: This week, the spot price of rebar moved lower. As of July 31, the price of HRB400E 20MM in Beijing decreased by 60 yuan/ton to 3,270 yuan/ton compared with last week. The spot price of hot - rolled coils also moved lower. As of July 31, the price of Benxi Steel 5.75*1500*C:Q235B in Tianjin decreased by 30 yuan/ton to 3,370 yuan/ton compared with last week [6]. 3.1.2 Spread Changes - Futures - spot spread: This week, the basis of the main RB2510 rebar contract compared with the HRB400E 20MM spot in Shanghai was 165 yuan/ton, a change of +91 yuan/ton compared with the previous week. The basis of the main HC2510 hot - rolled coil contract compared with the 5.5*1500*C:Q235B:Ansteel spot in Shanghai was 40 yuan/ton, a change of +57 yuan/ton compared with the previous week [11]. - Inter - monthly spread: This week, the RB2601 - RB2510 spread was 56 yuan/ton, a change of +13 yuan/ton compared with the previous week. The HC2601 - HC2510 spread was 7 yuan/ton, a change of - 4 yuan/ton compared with the previous week [12]. - Rebar - hot - rolled coil spread: This week, the HC2510 - RB2510 spread was 185 yuan/ton, a change of +34 yuan/ton compared with the previous week. The HC2601 - RB2601 spread was 136 yuan/ton, a change of +17 yuan/ton compared with the previous week [13]. 3.2 Supply - Demand Situation Analysis 3.2.1 Supply - This week, the blast furnace operating rate of 247 steel mills surveyed by Mysteel was 83.46%, unchanged from last week and 2.18 percentage points higher than last year. The steel mill profitability rate was 65.37%, an increase of 1.73 percentage points from last week and 58.88 percentage points higher than last year. The daily average pig iron output was 2.4071 million tons, a decrease of 15,200 tons from last week but an increase of 40,900 tons compared with last year [20]. - The total weekly output of the five major steel products was 867,420 tons, a week - on - week increase of 450 tons. The increase was mainly in cold - and hot - rolled coils, while the output of other varieties decreased to varying degrees [20]. - The profitability rate of 247 steel mills continued to increase to 65.37%, reaching a high in more than nine months. The blast furnace operating rate remained unchanged at 83.46% for the third consecutive week. The blast furnace iron - making capacity utilization rate decreased to 90.24%, and the daily average pig iron output continued to decline by 15,200 tons to 2.4071 million tons, but the year - on - year increase still reached 1.73% [20]. 3.2.2 Demand - Recently, the State Council approved the construction of a hydropower project in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River with a total investment of 1.2 trillion yuan, indicating good prospects for future infrastructure steel demand. - On the 31st, the third round of Sino - US economic and trade negotiations ended, and both sides agreed to extend the tariff truce period originally due to expire on August 12 by 90 days. The tariffs on China remained the same as before. There are signs of easing in Sino - US trade frictions and expectations of future Fed rate cuts. It is expected that the path for the implementation of the off - season logic will be less smooth, and demand will maintain a certain level of resilience. Currently, the demand for hot - rolled coils is still stronger than that for rebar, and this pattern is expected to continue for some time due to the arrival of the seasonal off - season for building materials [30]. 3.2.3 Inventory - This week, the social inventory of steel products in major cities across the country was 942,370 tons, a week - on - week increase of 152,900 tons. The inventory of steel mills by variety was 409,520 tons, a week - on - week increase of 1,000 tons. The total inventory of social and steel mills was 1.35189 million tons, a week - on - week increase of 153,900 tons. The overall inventory is at a low level compared with the same period, and steel mills have significantly reduced their inventory, transferring it downstream, continuing a certain de - stocking trend [36]. 3.2.4 Profit - The profitability rate of 247 steel mills continued to increase to 65.37%, reaching a high in more than nine months. The blast furnace operating rate remained unchanged at 83.46% for the third consecutive week. The blast furnace iron - making capacity utilization rate decreased to 90.24%, and the daily average pig iron output continued to decline by 15,200 tons to 2.4071 million tons, but the year - on - year increase still reached 1.73% [47]. - With the recovery of profits, electric - arc furnace steel mills continued to increase production and resume production, resulting in a significant increase in the operating rate and capacity utilization rate. However, due to poor steel sales, the overall recovery amplitude narrowed. As of July 30, the average operating rate of 87 independent electric - arc furnace steel mills in the country increased by 2.19% to 74.21%, and the capacity utilization rate increased by 1.56% to 57.05%, both reaching an eight - week high [47]. 3.2.5 Raw Material Prices - Affected by domestic policies this week, the prices of major raw materials fluctuated significantly. The price of Tangshan steel billets decreased by 100 yuan/ton to 3,097 yuan/ton, and the price of 61.5% PB powder decreased by 17 yuan/ton to 765 yuan/ton [56]. 3.3 Summary and Investment Suggestions - This week, the inventory of the five major steel products increased by 153,900 tons to 1.35189 million tons, ending a four - week decline and reaching a seven - week high. The social inventory increased by 153,900 tons, and the steel mill inventory increased slightly by 1,000 tons. Specifically, the social inventory of rebar increased by 111,700 tons, while the steel mill inventory decreased by 35,200 tons. The weekly output decreased slightly, and the apparent demand decreased by 6.08% or 131,700 tons to 2.0341 million tons, the lowest in five months. The output increase of hot - rolled coils was greater than the inventory increase, and the apparent demand rebounded by 47,600 tons to 3.2 million tons. The apparent demand for cold - rolled and medium - thick plates fluctuated relatively little [60]. - Currently, the proportion of industrial logic is gradually increasing, and policy expectations are decreasing. After important events such as Sino - US tariff negotiations, the Politburo meeting, and the US interest - rate meeting have concluded, market sentiment has significantly cooled. In the short term, prices have entered a period of volatile consolidation, but the upward trend is expected to remain unchanged, although the momentum has slowed. In the later stage, attention should be paid to whether terminal demand can show better - than - expected performance [60].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: PB-ROE-50 Strategy - **Model Construction Idea**: The core idea is to identify expectation gaps in the market and enhance portfolio returns by incorporating surprise expectation factors (e.g., SUE, ROE YoY growth) [31] - **Model Construction Process**: - Based on the PB-ROE pricing model derived by Wilcox (1984), stocks with significant expectation gaps are selected to form a pool - From this pool, 50 stocks are selected using factors such as standardized unexpected earnings (SUE) and ROE YoY growth to construct the PB-ROE-50 portfolio [31] - **Model Evaluation**: The strategy achieved positive excess returns across different stock pools, demonstrating its effectiveness in capturing market expectation gaps [31] 2. Model Name: Institutional Research Strategy - **Model Construction Idea**: This strategy leverages public and private institutional research data to extract alpha by analyzing the frequency of company visits and stock performance relative to benchmarks before the visits [39] - **Model Construction Process**: - Public Research Selection: Stocks are selected based on the number of visits by public institutions and their relative performance to the CSI 800 index - Private Research Tracking: Stocks are selected based on the number of visits by well-known private institutions and their relative performance to the CSI 800 index [39] - **Model Evaluation**: Both public and private research strategies generated significant positive excess returns, indicating the value of institutional research data in stock selection [39] --- Model Backtesting Results 1. PB-ROE-50 Strategy - **Excess Return (YTD)**: - CSI 500: 3.62% - CSI 800: 9.73% - All Market: 10.36% [35] - **Excess Return (Last Month)**: - CSI 500: 0.59% - CSI 800: 2.91% - All Market: 2.34% [35] - **Absolute Return (YTD)**: - CSI 500: 12.68% - CSI 800: 15.10% - All Market: 20.07% [35] - **Absolute Return (Last Month)**: - CSI 500: 5.88% - CSI 800: 7.02% - All Market: 6.77% [35] 2. Institutional Research Strategy - **Excess Return (YTD)**: - Public Research: 7.03% - Private Research: 18.00% [42] - **Excess Return (Last Month)**: - Public Research: 3.66% - Private Research: 5.58% [42] - **Absolute Return (YTD)**: - Public Research: 12.26% - Private Research: 23.77% [42] - **Absolute Return (Last Month)**: - Public Research: 7.80% - Private Research: 9.80% [42] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods 1. Factor Name: Percentage of Advancing Stocks (Market Sentiment Indicator) - **Factor Construction Idea**: Strong-performing stocks often exhibit a demonstration effect, and the percentage of advancing stocks can reflect market sentiment. A higher percentage indicates optimism, while an overly high percentage may signal overheating [12] - **Factor Construction Process**: - Formula: $ \text{Percentage of Advancing Stocks (N days)} = \frac{\text{Number of CSI 300 stocks with positive returns over N days}}{\text{Total number of CSI 300 stocks}} $ - The indicator is smoothed using two moving averages (N1 = 50, N2 = 35). When the short-term average (fast line) exceeds the long-term average (slow line), it signals a bullish market sentiment [12][13][15] - **Factor Evaluation**: The indicator effectively captures upward opportunities but struggles to avoid risks in declining markets. It may also miss gains during prolonged market exuberance [12] 2. Factor Name: Moving Average Sentiment Indicator - **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor uses an eight-moving-average system to assess the trend state of the CSI 300 index. By assigning values to different ranges of the moving average, the relationship between indicator states and index trends becomes clearer [20] - **Factor Construction Process**: - Calculate the eight moving averages of the CSI 300 closing price (parameters: 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233) - Assign values based on the range of the moving averages: - Range 1/2/3: -1 - Range 4/5/6: 0 - Range 7/8/9: 1 - A bullish signal is generated when the number of moving averages below the current price exceeds 5 [20][26] - **Factor Evaluation**: The indicator provides a clear relationship between sentiment states and index trends, aiding in market timing [20] 3. Factor Name: Leverage Ratios (Debt Indicators) - **Factor Construction Idea**: High leverage ratios indicate greater debt pressure and liquidity risks. Three calculation methods (traditional, strict, and relaxed) are used to assess leverage comprehensively [44] - **Factor Construction Process**: - Traditional Leverage Ratio: $ \text{Traditional Leverage Ratio} = \frac{\text{Short-term Debt + Long-term Debt + Bonds Payable}}{\text{Total Assets}} $ - Strict Leverage Ratio: $ \text{Strict Leverage Ratio} = \frac{\text{Short-term Debt + Interest Payable + Financial Liabilities + Short-term Bonds + Lease Liabilities + Long-term Debt + Bonds Payable + Long-term Payables}}{\text{Total Assets}} $ - Relaxed Leverage Ratio: $ \text{Relaxed Leverage Ratio} = \frac{\text{Strict Leverage Components + Other Current Liabilities + Liabilities Held for Sale + Non-current Liabilities Due Within One Year}}{\text{Total Assets}} $ [44] - **Factor Evaluation**: The relaxed leverage ratio provides more opportunities for short positions compared to traditional metrics [44] 4. Factor Name: Financial Cost Burden Ratio - **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor measures the pressure of interest payments on companies by isolating interest expenses from financial costs, providing a clearer view of financial burdens [48] - **Factor Construction Process**: - Formula: $ \text{Financial Cost Burden Ratio} = \frac{\text{Interest Expenses}}{\text{EBIT}} $ [48] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor effectively highlights companies with high financial stress, aiding in risk identification [48] --- Factor Backtesting Results 1. Percentage of Advancing Stocks - **Latest Value**: Above 70% as of July 31, 2025, indicating high market sentiment [12] 2. Moving Average Sentiment Indicator - **Latest State**: CSI 300 index is in a sentiment boom zone as of July 31, 2025 [20] 3. Leverage Ratios - **Top Stocks by Relaxed Leverage Ratio**: - Example: Dizhiyiyao-U (64.10%), Shenzhouxibao (64.06%), Zhongyida (59.68%) [45] 4. Financial Cost Burden Ratio - **Top Stocks by Financial Cost Burden**: - Example: Liaoning Chengda (241084.42), Yinbaoshanxin (2314.41), Ashichuang (69.43) [49]

Core Viewpoint - The company's stock price is influenced by multiple factors including macroeconomic conditions and market sentiment, and it has established a comprehensive performance evaluation system for management that links assessment results to compensation and promotions [1] Group 1 - The company has developed a multidimensional management assessment system covering financial indicators, business expansion, and team management [1] - The assessment results are directly tied to compensation and promotion, ensuring alignment with performance [1] - The company is committed to continuously optimizing its management practices to enhance operational efficiency [1]

金信期货日刊 本刊由金信期货研究院撰写 2025/08/01 GOLDTRUST FUTURES CO.，LTD 氧化铝期货大涨转下跌，后续走势解析 ibaotu.com 热点聚焦 近期，氧化铝期货市场走势跌宕起伏，先是大幅上涨，后又迅速下跌，引发了市场参与者的广泛关注。那 么，这背后的原因是什么？后续又该如何看待呢？ 感谢您下载包图网平台上提供的PPT作品，为了您和包图网以及原创作者的利益，请勿复制、传播、销售，否则将承担法律责任！包图网将对作品进行维权，按照传播下载次数进行十倍的索取赔偿！ 从上涨原因来看，主要是政策预期和市场情绪的推动。7月19日工信部提到即将推出有色行业稳增长方案， 鉴于之前"反内卷"政策对多晶硅、焦煤等品种的影响，多头资金大量涌入氧化铝市场 ，推动价格持续攀 升，直至突破3500元/吨整数关口才遇阻。 GOLDTRUST FUTURES CO.，LTD | 主力动向 | | | | --- | --- | --- | | GOLDTRUST | FUTURES | CO.，LTD | | 感谢您下载包图网平台上提供的PPT作品，为了您和包图网以及原创作者的利益，请勿复制、传播、销售， ...

Group 1 - Market sentiment continues to decline, with glass futures experiencing a drop in the night session [1] - Institutional analysis indicates that the policy measures have not exceeded expectations, leading to fluctuations in market sentiment [1] - Continuous inventory decline is seen as a sign of improvement in the fundamentals, but the current industry mindset remains cautious, with the market in a high volatility phase [1]

市场情绪复杂，黄金还会继续下跌吗？入场策略如何优化？Richard正在直播解读中，点击马上观看！ 相关链接 黄金走势实时分析中 ...

黄金美盘分析直播中 美联储决议后，市场情绪更为谨慎，短期能看多吗？Richard正在直播解析关键位，点击马上观看！ 相关链接 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided 2. Core Viewpoints - On July 31, the coking coal 2509 contract closed at 1045.5, down 7.97% and hitting the daily limit. After several macro - events settled, market sentiment weakened. Fundamentally, mine - end inventory generally decreased, clean coal inventory shifted from upstream mines and coal - washing plants to downstream coal - using enterprises, import cumulative growth rate declined for 3 consecutive months, and total inventory increased for 4 consecutive weeks with a moderately high inventory level. Technically, the 4 - hour cycle K - line is between the 20 and 60 moving averages, and it should be treated as a volatile operation [2]. - On July 31, the coke 2509 contract closed at 1601.0, down 4.93%. The spot market started the fifth round of price increase. After the Politburo meeting on July 30, there was no obvious incremental policy expectation, and with the impact of position limits, the market became cautious about high prices. Fundamentally, raw - material inventory rebounded, this period's hot - metal output was 242.23 tons, a decrease of 0.21 tons, with high hot - metal production and no pressure on coal - mine inventory, and the total coking coal inventory increased for 4 consecutive weeks. In terms of profit, the average loss per ton of coke for 30 independent coking plants nationwide was 54 yuan/ton this period. Technically, the 4 - hour cycle K - line is between the 20 and 60 moving averages, and it should be treated as a volatile operation [2]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Futures Market - JM main contract closing price was 1045.50 yuan/ton, down 71.50 yuan; J main contract closing price was 1601.00 yuan/ton, down 75.50 yuan [2]. - JM futures contract holding volume was 783278.00 lots, down 10291.00 lots; J futures contract holding volume was 50815.00 lots, down 241.00 lots [2]. - Net position of the top 20 coking coal contracts was - 108407.00 lots, down 14621.00 lots; net position of the top 20 coke contracts was - 6493.00 lots, up 874.00 lots [2]. - JM 1 - 9 month contract spread was 89.50 yuan/ton, down 26.00 yuan; J 1 - 9 month contract spread was 53.50 yuan/ton, down 10.00 yuan [2]. - Coking coal warehouse receipts were 0.00; coke warehouse receipts were 760.00 [2]. 3.2 Spot Market - Ganqimao Meng 5 raw coal was 1000.00 yuan/ton, down 13.00 yuan; Tangshan quasi - first - grade metallurgical coke was 1610.00 yuan/ton, unchanged [2]. - Russian main coking coal forward spot (CFR) was 143.50 US dollars/wet ton, unchanged; Rizhao Port quasi - first - grade metallurgical coke was 1420.00 yuan/ton, unchanged [2]. - Jingtang Port Australian imported main coking coal was 1550.00 yuan/ton, up 130.00 yuan; Tianjin Port first - grade metallurgical coke was 1520.00 yuan/ton, unchanged [2]. - Jingtang Port Shanxi - produced main coking coal was 1680.00 yuan/ton, unchanged; Tianjin Port quasi - first - grade metallurgical coke was 1420.00 yuan/ton, unchanged [2]. - Shanxi Jinzhong Lingshi medium - sulfur main coking coal was 1400.00 yuan/ton, unchanged; J main contract basis was 9.00 yuan/ton, up 75.50 yuan [2]. - Inner Mongolia Wuhai - produced coking coal ex - factory price was 1080.00 yuan/ton, unchanged; JM main contract basis was 354.50 yuan/ton, up 71.50 yuan [2]. 3.3 Upstream Situation - Raw coal inventory of 110 coal - washing plants was 277.10 million tons, down 15.43 million tons; clean coal inventory of 110 coal - washing plants was 166.39 million tons, down 9.23 million tons [2]. - Operating rate of 110 coal - washing plants was 61.51%, down 0.80%; raw coal output was 42107.40 million tons, up 1779.00 million tons [2]. - Coal and lignite import volume was 3304.00 million tons, down 300.00 million tons; daily average output of raw coal from 523 coking coal mines was 193.60 million tons, down 1.20 million tons [2]. - Imported coking coal inventory at 16 ports was 512.04 million tons, down 41.46 million tons; coke inventory at 18 ports was 250.33 million tons, down 2.38 million tons [2]. 3.4 Industry Situation - Total coking coal inventory of independent coking enterprises (full sample) was 985.38 million tons, up 56.27 million tons; total coke inventory of independent coking enterprises (full sample) was 80.12 million tons, down 7.43 million tons [2]. - Coking coal inventory of 247 steel mills nationwide was 799.51 million tons, up 8.41 million tons; coke inventory of 247 sample steel mills nationwide was 639.98 million tons, up 0.99 million tons [2]. - Available days of coking coal for independent coking enterprises (full sample) was 12.75 days, up 0.12 days; available days of coke for 247 sample steel mills was 11.45 days, down 0.01 days [2]. - Coking coal import volume was 910.84 million tons, up 172.10 million tons; coke and semi - coke export volume was 51.00 million tons, down 17.00 million tons [2]. - Coking coal output was 4070.27 million tons, up 144.11 million tons; capacity utilization rate of independent coking enterprises was 73.45%, up 0.44% [2]. - Ton - coke profit of independent coking plants was - 54.00 yuan/ton, down 11.00 yuan; coke output was 4170.30 million tons, down 67.30 million tons [2]. 3.5 Downstream Situation - Blast furnace operating rate of 247 steel mills was 83.48%, unchanged; blast furnace iron - making capacity utilization rate of 247 steel mills was 90.78%, down 0.14% [2]. - Crude steel output was 8318.40 million tons, down 336.10 million tons [2]. 3.6 Industry News - The Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee will hold the Fourth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee in October to study suggestions on formulating the 15th Five - Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development [2]. - The US will impose a 15% tariff on South Korea, a 40% additional tariff on Brazil (total tariff reaching 50%), and a 25% tariff on goods from India [2]. - The International Energy Agency predicts that global electricity demand will grow strongly, with an expected growth of 3.3% in 2025 and 3.7% in 2026 [2]. - The Bank of Canada maintained the key policy rate at 2.75% for the third consecutive time and said the risk of a serious escalation of the global trade war has weakened [2].